RESUMEN
Schistosomiasis treatment entirely relies on a single drug, praziquantel, prompting research into alternative therapeutics. Here we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the antimalarial combination artesunate-mefloquine for the treatment of schistosomiasis in a proof-of-concept, pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled trial in primary schools of six villages endemic for schistosomiasis in northern Senegal. Children (6-14 years) were eligible if Schistosoma eggs were detected by microscopy in urine and/or stool. In total, 726 children were randomized 1:1 to praziquantel (standard care: 40 mg kg-1 single dose; n = 364) or to artesunate-mefloquine (antimalarial dosage: artesunate 4 mg kg-1 and mefloquine 8 mg kg-1 daily for three consecutive days; n = 362). Eight children not meeting the inclusion criteria were excluded from efficacy analysis. Median age of the remaining 718 participants was 9 years; 399 (55.6%) were male, and 319 (44.4%) female; 99.3% were infected with Schistosoma haematobium and 15.2% with S. mansoni. Primary outcomes were cure rate, assessed by microscopy, and frequency of drug-related adverse effects of artesunate-mefloquine versus praziquantel at 4 weeks after treatment. Cure rate was 59.6% (208/349) in the artesunate-mefloquine arm versus 62.1% (211/340) in the praziquantel arm. The difference of -2.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) -9.8 to 4.8) met the predefined criteria of noninferiority (margin set at 10%). All drug-related adverse events were mild or moderate, and reported in 28/361 children receiving artesunate-mefloquine (7.8%; 95% CI 5.4 to 11.0) versus 8/363 (2.2%; 95% CI 1.1 to 4.3) receiving praziquantel (P < 0.001). Artesunate-mefloquine at antimalarial dosage was moderately safe and noninferior to standard-care praziquantel for the treatment of schistosomiasis, predominantly due to S. haematobium. Multicentric trials in different populations and epidemiological settings are needed to confirm these findings. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03893097 .
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , Esquistosomiasis , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Artesunato/efectos adversos , Mefloquina/efectos adversos , Praziquantel/efectos adversos , Esquistosomiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , AdolescenteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis control relies on praziquantel for preventive chemotherapy. Alternative drugs are needed for the treatment and control of schistosomiasis. Praziquantel is effective against adult schistosome worms but ineffective against larval stages of the parasite and cannot prevent re-infection or interrupt the transmission of infection. Continued reliance on praziquantel for wide-scale schistosomiasis control will likely accelerate the emergence of drug resistance. Artemisinin derivatives are effective against the juvenile stages but ineffective against adult worms. The SCHISTOACT study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of praziquantel plus one of four artemisinin-based combinations in treating Schistosoma mansoni infection in Kenya. METHODS: The SCHISTOACT study is an open-label, head-to-head, five-arm, proof-of-concept, non-inferiority, individually randomized controlled trial with a follow-up of 12 weeks. A total of 540 primary school-aged children from the Mwea area, Kirinyaga County in central Kenya, diagnosed with S. mansoni infection (by Kato-Katz method) are randomly allocated (1:1:1:1:1) to a single dose of praziquantel plus a 3-day course of artesunate-sulfalene/pyrimethamine, or artesunate-amodiaquine, or artesunate plus mefloquine, or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, or praziquantel control arm. The primary endpoints are efficacy (cure rate, assessed by microscopy) and safety (adverse events) of each study arm 6 weeks after treatment. Secondary endpoints include cumulative cure rate, egg reduction rate, and re-infection 12 weeks after treatment. The non-inferiority margin is set at - 10 for the risk difference in cure rates between praziquantel and the combined treatment. DISCUSSION: This study assesses a strategy for repurposing artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) for treating schistosomiasis. It adopts a head-to-head comparison of four different ACTs to test a non-inferiority hypothesis and to strengthen local capacity to conduct clinical trials for interventions against neglected tropical diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202001919442161 . Retrospectively registered on 6 January 2020.
Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos , Artemisininas , Esquistosomiasis mansoni , Esquistosomiasis , Adulto , Animales , Niño , Humanos , Artemisininas/efectos adversos , Artesunato/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Praziquantel/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Reinfección/inducido químicamente , Reinfección/tratamiento farmacológico , Schistosoma mansoni , Esquistosomiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquistosomiasis mansoni/diagnóstico , Esquistosomiasis mansoni/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquistosomiasis mansoni/inducido químicamente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de Equivalencia como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of topical artesunate ointment for treatment of biopsy-confirmed Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) 2/3. METHODS: Participants were enrolled on a prospective, IRB-approved, dose-escalation phase I trial testing either 1, 2 or 3 treatment cycles (5 days), every other week, as applicable. Clinical assessments were completed prior to each dose cycle and included exam and review of adverse event (AE) diary cards. HPV testing and colposcopy was completed at 15 and 28 weeks. AEs were assessed according to CTCAE 4.0 criteria. Complete responders (CR) underwent biopsy of the treated site at the 28-weeks while partial (PR) and non (NR)-responders underwent surgical resection or biopsy and ablation. RESULTS: Fifteen patients consented to and began treatment. Per-protocol assessments were completed in 100% at 15- and 80% at 28-weeks. All patients completed prescribed cycles with no grade 3 or 4 AEs. Vulvovaginal burning/ was the most common AE occurring in 93.3%. AEs were grade 2 in 23.7% and included vulvovaginal pruritus (n = 3), swelling (n = 3) and candidiasis (n = 2). The highest ORR was in the 3-cycle group (88.9% with 55.6% CR). HPV-16 was detected either alone (46.7%) or with other subtypes (33.3%) in 80% of lesions and 5 of 8 (62.5%) with CR had complete viral clearance. CONCLUSIONS: Topical artesunate for treatment of high-grade VIN shows high tolerability, low toxicity and evidence for clinical response in this initial small series. The safety and observed responses support further study in a Phase II trial.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma in Situ , Neoplasias , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Neoplasias de la Vulva , Femenino , Humanos , Artesunato/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Biopsia , Neoplasias de la Vulva/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vulva/patología , Carcinoma in Situ/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed at determining whether intravenous artesunate is safe and effective in reducing multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in trauma patients with major hemorrhage. METHODS: TOP-ART, a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, phase IIa trial, was conducted at a London major trauma center in adult trauma patients who activated the major hemorrhage protocol. Participants received artesunate or placebo (2:1 randomization ratio) as an intravenous bolus dose (2.4 mg/kg or 4.8 mg/kg) within 4 h of injury. The safety outcome was the 28-day serious adverse event (SAE) rate. The primary efficacy outcome was the 48 h sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. The per-protocol recruitment target was 105 patients. RESULTS: The trial was terminated after enrolment of 90 patients because of safety concerns. Eighty-three participants received artesunate (n = 54) or placebo (n = 29) and formed the safety population and 75 met per-protocol criteria (48 artesunate, 27 placebo). Admission characteristics were similar between groups (overall 88% male, median age 29 years, median injury severity score 22), except participants who received artesunate were more shocked (median base deficit 9 vs. 4.7, p = 0.042). SAEs occurred in 17 artesunate participants (31%) vs. 5 who received placebo (17%). Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) occurred in 9 artesunate participants (17%) vs. 1 who received placebo (3%). Superiority of artesunate was not supported by the 48 h SOFA score (median 5.5 artesunate vs. 4 placebo, p = 0.303) or any of the trial's secondary endpoints. CONCLUSION: Among critically ill trauma patients, artesunate is unlikely to improve organ dysfunction and might be associated with a higher VTE rate.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Tromboembolia Venosa , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Artesunato/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of intravenous artesunate (IVAS) for treatment of severe malaria in endemic and nonendemic countries. However, post-artesunate delayed hemolysis (PADH) is an increasingly recognized phenomenon after its administration. This study describes the prevalence and outcomes of PADH events among severe malaria cases treated with IVAS in the United States. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with severe malaria and treated with IVAS from April 2019 to July 2021 were included. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, therapeutic, and outcome measures were described using proportions, medians, and interquartile range. Patients reported to experience PADH were compared with those not reported to have PADH, and tests of significance were performed. RESULTS: Of 332 patients included in our analysis, 9 (2.7%) experienced PADH. The majority of infections in both groups were in non-Hispanic Black individuals. Parasite density (11.0% vs 8.0%), admission hemoglobin (11.0 g/dL vs 11.8 g/dL) were similar in the 2 groups. Total bilirubin levels at admission (4.7 mg/dL vs 2.2 mg/dL) and within 8 hours after completion of IVAS (2.6 mg/dL vs 1.2 mg/dL) were notably higher in PADH patients. Cumulative IVAS dose of >9.5 mg/kg and >3 doses of IVAS were risk factors for PADH. The majority (7 of 9) of PADH cases were diagnosed within 2 weeks after initiation of IVAS. Five patients (56%) required blood transfusions, and all recovered without sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: PADH is an uncommon and self-limiting adverse event in many cases; weekly monitoring of hemoglobin and hemolytic markers may identify cases requiring intervention in a timely manner.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , Artemisininas , Malaria Falciparum , Malaria , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Artesunato/efectos adversos , Hemólisis , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Artemisininas/efectos adversos , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria/epidemiología , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Importance: Malaria is caused by protozoa parasites of the genus Plasmodium and is diagnosed in approximately 2000 people in the US each year who have returned from visiting regions with endemic malaria. The mortality rate from malaria is approximately 0.3% in the US and 0.26% worldwide. Observations: In the US, most malaria is diagnosed in people who traveled to an endemic region. More than 80% of people diagnosed with malaria in the US acquired the infection in Africa. Of the approximately 2000 people diagnosed with malaria in the US in 2017, an estimated 82.4% were adults and about 78.6% were Black or African American. Among US residents diagnosed with malaria, 71.7% had not taken malaria chemoprophylaxis during travel. In 2017 in the US, P falciparum was the species diagnosed in approximately 79% of patients, whereas P vivax was diagnosed in an estimated 11.2% of patients. In 2017 in the US, severe malaria, defined as vital organ involvement including shock, pulmonary edema, significant bleeding, seizures, impaired consciousness, and laboratory abnormalities such as kidney impairment, acidosis, anemia, or high parasitemia, occurred in approximately 14% of patients, and an estimated 0.3% of those receiving a diagnosis of malaria in the US died. P falciparum has developed resistance to chloroquine in most regions of the world, including Africa. First-line therapy for P falciparum malaria in the US is combination therapy that includes artemisinin. If P falciparum was acquired in a known chloroquine-sensitive region such as Haiti, chloroquine remains an alternative option. When artemisinin-based combination therapies are not available, atovaquone-proguanil or quinine plus clindamycin is used for chloroquine-resistant malaria. P vivax, P ovale, P malariae, and P knowlesi are typically chloroquine sensitive, and treatment with either artemisinin-based combination therapy or chloroquine for regions with chloroquine-susceptible infections for uncomplicated malaria is recommended. For severe malaria, intravenous artesunate is first-line therapy. Treatment of mild malaria due to a chloroquine-resistant parasite consists of a combination therapy that includes artemisinin or chloroquine for chloroquine-sensitive malaria. P vivax and P ovale require additional therapy with an 8-aminoquinoline to eradicate the liver stage. Several options exist for chemoprophylaxis and selection should be based on patient characteristics and preferences. Conclusions and Relevance: Approximately 2000 cases of malaria are diagnosed each year in the US, most commonly in travelers returning from visiting endemic areas. Prevention and treatment of malaria depend on the species and the drug sensitivity of parasites from the region of acquisition. Intravenous artesunate is first-line therapy for severe malaria.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Malaria , Enfermedad Relacionada con los Viajes , Adulto , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/efectos adversos , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Artesunato/efectos adversos , Artesunato/uso terapéutico , Cloroquina/efectos adversos , Cloroquina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Malaria/diagnóstico , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria/epidemiología , Malaria/prevención & control , Malaria Falciparum/diagnóstico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Malaria Falciparum/prevención & control , Viaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The artemisinin derivatives are the preferred antimalaria drugs for treating severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria. However, their clinical effectiveness compared to each other is unknown. Our objective, therefore, was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the artemisinin derivatives and quinine for treating severe P. falciparum malaria in children and adults using a network meta-analysis. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Review protocol was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020218190. We updated the search strategies of three Cochrane systematic reviews which included published and unpublished randomised control trials (RCTs) that have compared specific artemisinin derivatives to quinine in treating severe malaria. Search included CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, ISI Web of Science and trial registries up to February 2021. We screened studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and quality of evidence in duplicate. Separate network meta-analyses in the frequentist framework, using a random effects model, with quinine as reference, were conducted for adults and children, and rankings were produced using p-scores to assess mortality, parasite clearance, coma recovery, fever clearance, neurological sequela and adverse events. Searches identified 818 citations, 33 RCTs were eligible. We pooled 7795 children and 3182 adults. The networks involved artesunate, artemether, rectal artemisinin, arteether and quinine. Compared to quinine, artesunate reduced mortality in children (risk ratio (RR), 0.76; 95%CI [0.65 to 0.89], moderate quality), adults (RR, 0.55; 95%CI [0.40 to 0.75], moderate quality) and in cerebral malaria (RR, 0.72; 95%CI [0.55 to 0.94], moderate quality). Compared to rectal artemisinin and intramuscular arteether, the efficacy and safety of parenteral artesunate, and intramuscular artemether in treating severe malaria are not clear. Rankings showed that none of the artemisinin drugs were consistently superior in all the outcomes assessed. Indirect evidence produced were of very low ratings due to suspected publication bias and imprecision. CONCLUSIONS: Artesunate reduces mortality compared to quinine for both adults and children in Asia and Africa including cerebral malaria. The artemisinin derivatives remain the best treatment for severe malaria but their comparative clinical effectiveness is yet to be fully explored.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , Artemisininas , Malaria Falciparum , Adulto , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Arteméter/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/efectos adversos , Artesunato/efectos adversos , Niño , Humanos , Malaria Cerebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Metaanálisis en Red , Quinina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Reports in recent years have shown that pancreatic ß-cell pyroptosis represents a critical mechanism involved with the progressive failure of pancreatic function. Previous research from our laboratory has indicated that artemether can increase the number of cells in pancreatic islets of db/db mice. In this study, we further examined whether artesunate (ART) protects pancreatic ß-cells from the damage of streptozotocin (STZ) by inhibiting pyroptosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro, MIN6 cells exposed to 1 mM STZ were treated with ART (0.8 or 1.6 µM). The effects of ART on STZ-treated cells were evaluated through CCK-8 assay, flow cytometry and western blot, and further compared the effects of ART with the NLRP3 inhibitor, Mcc950 upon pyroptosis pathway proteins using western blot. In vivo, Male C57 mice were administered with a single intraperitoneal injection of STZ, and those with confirmed diabetes mellitus were given ART (0.5 or 1.0 mg/ml in drinking water) for 18 days. The effects of ART on STZ-induced diabetes were assessed by the observation of the general situation, glucose tolerance test, hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In MIN6 cells treated with STZ, we found that ART increased cell viability, decreased the number of late apoptotic cells (including pyroptosis cells) and inhibited the expression of proteins associated with the pyroptosis pathway. In STZ-induced animal model, the administration of ART reduced blood glucose levels, improved the consumption status within this diabetic mouse model and inhibited the expression of proteins include in the pyroptosis pathway in mice pancreats. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of pyroptosis may be a critical mechanism through which artesunate exerts protective effects upon pancreatic ß cells.
Asunto(s)
Artesunato , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental , Células Secretoras de Insulina , Animales , Artesunato/efectos adversos , Artesunato/farmacología , Caspasa 1/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/metabolismo , Células Secretoras de Insulina/efectos de los fármacos , Células Secretoras de Insulina/metabolismo , Masculino , Ratones , Proteína con Dominio Pirina 3 de la Familia NLR/metabolismo , Proteínas de Unión a Fosfato/metabolismo , Proteínas Citotóxicas Formadoras de Poros/metabolismo , EstreptozocinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: IgA nephropathy is the most common glomerular disease and is a common cause of progression to end-stage renal disease in patients with kidney diseases. Proteinuria levels are critical for the prognosis of patients with IgA nephropathy, but many patients are still unable to effectively control their proteinuria levels after receiving RAAS blockers. Antimalarial drugs have shown good efficacy in the treatment of kidney disease in previous studies; however, there have been no strictly designed randomized controlled trials to confirm the clinical efficacy of artesunate for treating IgA nephropathy patients. Therefore, we designed this clinical trial to compare the effect of artesunate versus placebo in patients with IgA nephropathy. METHODS: This study is a randomized, double-blind, three-group-parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial. One hundred and twenty eligible IgA nephropathy patients at risk of progression will be randomly divided into the artesunate 100-mg group, artesunate 50-mg group, and placebo group. Changes in proteinuria and renal function will be measured 6 months after the intervention. The levels of Gd-IgA1 and anti-Gd-IgA1 in the patient's blood will also be tested to explore the possible immune mechanisms. DISCUSSION: Clinical evidence supporting artesunate treatment of IgA nephropathy is currently lacking, and we expect that the results of this trial will provide high-quality clinical evidence for artesunate as a treatment option for IgA nephropathy in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000038104 . Registered on 10 September 2020.
Asunto(s)
Glomerulonefritis por IGA , Artesunato/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Glomerulonefritis por IGA/diagnóstico , Glomerulonefritis por IGA/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina A , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Proteinuria/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Periodontitis is an inflammatory disease of the gums. Periodontitis in diabetic patients can aggravate insulin resistance; however, its molecular and biological mechanism remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the effects of diabetic periodontitis on liver function and determine the mechanism by which artesunate improves liver function. Rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes were divided into five groups: normal control (NC), diabetic periodontitis (DM + PD), artesunate intervention (ART), insulin intervention (INS), and combined medication intervention (ART + INS) groups. Drug interventions were then administered to the rats in each group as follows: 50 mg/kg artesunate to the ART group, 6 U/kg insulin to the INS group, and 50 mg/kg artesunate + 6 U/kg insulin to the ART + INS group. Blood samples, liver tissues, and the maxillary alveolar bone were collected postsacrifice. ART was found to significantly ameliorate hyperglycemia, blood lipid concentrations, and liver function. The levels of inflammatory factors reduced; the effect was more pronounced in the ART + INS group. Artesunate presumably inhibits the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway and expression of downstream inflammatory factors, thereby exerting a protective effect on diabetes-related liver function. This offers a fresh approach to treat diabetes mellitus.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Experimental , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Periodontitis , Animales , Artesunato/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/metabolismo , Insulina , Hígado , FN-kappa B/metabolismo , Periodontitis/complicaciones , Periodontitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Periodontitis/metabolismo , RatasRESUMEN
We report the case of a 51-year-old man with severe malaria, who developed delayed autoimmune haemolytic anaemia following artesunate therapy. Delayed autoimmune haemolytic anaemia following artesunate therapy has been previously described. Its diagnosis can be challenging in the setting of possible dengue coinfection. Clinicians should be vigilant of this potential side effect of artesunate therapy, especially in patients who later develop signs and symptoms of haemolytic anaemia.
Asunto(s)
Anemia Hemolítica Autoinmune , Antimaláricos , Malaria Falciparum , Malaria , Anemia Hemolítica Autoinmune/inducido químicamente , Anemia Hemolítica Autoinmune/tratamiento farmacológico , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Artesunato/efectos adversos , Humanos , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evidence exists as to the criticality of the first 24 h in the management of cerebral malaria. The morbidity and the mortality rate (35%) with the current intravenous monotherapy for the initial treatment of cerebral malaria are unacceptably high. Combination therapy and a shorter course of effective medication have been shown to improve outcomes in human participants in the treatment of other diseases. This study outlines a protocol to conduct a triple blinded parallel randomized controlled trial on cerebral malaria using dual intravenous medications compared to the current standard of monotherapy. METHODS: This is a parallel multi-site randomized controlled superiority triple blinded trial consisting of intravenous artesunate plus quinine and a control arm of intravenous artesunate only. Eligible and assenting children aged 6 months to 17 years will be recruited from 4 tertiary hospitals by random selection from the list of tertiary hospitals in Nigeria. Participants will be randomized and assigned in parallel into two arms using random numbers generated from GraphPad Prism (version 9) by a clinical pharmacologist who has no link with the investigators, the patients, or the statistician. The primary measurable outcome is survival at 12, 24, and 48 h post-randomization. A composite secondary outcome consists of the number of children that regained consciousness, parasitaemia and defervescence at 12 and 24 h post-randomization and haematological and inflammatory markers at 24 and 48 h post-randomization. Adverse events both solicited and unsolicited are recorded all through the study post-randomization. The study is approved by the State Research Ethics Review Committee. Data analysis will be performed in GraphPad Prism version 9. DISCUSSION: The outcome of this analysis will give insight into the efficacy and safety of dual intravenous antimalaria in the treatment of cerebral malaria among Nigerian children compared with the standard of care. The safety profile of this intervention will also be highlighted. This may help inform physicians on the optimal treatment for cerebral malaria to improve outcomes and reduce recrudescence and treatment failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan Africa Clinical Trial Registry PACTR202102893629864 . 23/02/2021.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , Artemisininas , Malaria Cerebral , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Artemisininas/efectos adversos , Artesunato/efectos adversos , Niño , Humanos , Malaria Cerebral/diagnóstico , Malaria Cerebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Nigeria , Quinina/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoAsunto(s)
Anemia , Antimaláricos , Artemisininas , Malaria Falciparum , Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Artemisininas/efectos adversos , Artesunato/efectos adversos , Hemólisis , Humanos , Malaria Falciparum/complicaciones , Malaria Falciparum/diagnóstico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Severe malaria can be deadly and requires treatment with intravenous artesunate (IVAS). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provided IVAS starting 1 April 2019 for all patients with severe malaria in the United States. This study describes the safety and effectiveness of IVAS in these patients. METHODS: Patients meeting criteria for severe malaria April 2019-December 2020 who received IVAS were included. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, adverse event, and outcome information were collected. Clinical presentation, time to reach 1% and 0% parasitemia, adverse events, and death were described using proportions, medians, interquartile range (IQR), and tests of significance for differences in proportions. RESULTS: Of 280 patients included, the majority were male (61.4%), Black (75.0%), with a median age of 35 years (IQR: 15.8-53.9). Most had Plasmodium falciparum (83.6%) with median parasitemia of 8.0% (IQR: 4.6-13.2). Of 170 patients with information, 159 (93.5%) reachedâ ≤1% parasitemia by the third IVAS dose with a median time of 17.6 hours (IQR: 10.8-28.8), and 0% parasitemia in a median of 37.2 hours (IQR 27.2-55.2). Patients with parasite densitiesâ >10% and those requiring adjunct therapy had significantly higher parasite clearance times. Adverse events associated with IVAS were reported in 4.8% (nâ =â 13 of 271). Eight patients had post-artesunate delayed hemolysis that resolved. There were 5 (1.8%) deaths, all attributable to severe malaria. CONCLUSIONS: IVAS is a safe and effective drug for the treatment of severe malaria in the United States; timely administration can be lifesaving.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , Artemisininas , Malaria Falciparum , Malaria , Adolescente , Adulto , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Artemisininas/efectos adversos , Artesunato/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In Phase II/III randomized controlled clinical trials for the treatment of acute uncomplicated malaria, pyronaridine-artesunate demonstrated high efficacy and a safety profile consistent with that of comparators, except that asymptomatic, mainly mild-to-moderate transient increases in liver aminotransferases were reported for some patients. Hepatic safety, tolerability, and effectiveness have not been previously assessed under real-world conditions in Africa. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This single-arm, open-label, cohort event monitoring study was conducted at 6 health centers in Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Ivory Coast, and Republic of Congo between June 2017 and April 2019. The trial protocol as closely as possible resembled real-world clinical practice for the treatment of malaria at the centers. Eligible patients were adults or children of either sex, weighing at least 5 kg, with acute uncomplicated malaria who did not have contraindications for pyronaridine-artesunate treatment as per the summary of product characteristics. Patients received fixed-dose pyronaridine-artesunate once daily for 3 days, dosed by body weight, without regard to food intake. A tablet formulation was used in adults and adolescents and a pediatric granule formulation in children and infants under 20 kg body weight. The primary outcome was the hepatic event incidence, defined as the appearance of the clinical signs and symptoms of hepatotoxicity confirmed by a >2× rise in alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST) versus baseline in patients with baseline ALT/AST >2× the upper limit of normal (ULN). As a secondary outcome, this was assessed in patients with ALT/AST >2× ULN prior to treatment versus a matched cohort of patients with normal baseline ALT/AST. The safety population comprised 7,154 patients, of mean age 13.9 years (standard deviation (SD) 14.6), around half of whom were male (3,569 [49.9%]). Patients experienced 8,560 malaria episodes; 158 occurred in patients with baseline ALT/AST elevations >2×ULN. No protocol-defined hepatic events occurred following pyronaridine-artesunate treatment of malaria patients with or without baseline hepatic dysfunction. Thus, no cohort comparison could be undertaken. Also, as postbaseline clinical chemistry was only performed where clinically indicated, postbaseline ALT/AST levels were not systematically assessed for all patients. Adverse events of any cause occurred in 20.8% (1,490/7,154) of patients, most frequently pyrexia (5.1% [366/7,154]) and vomiting (4.2% [303/7,154]). Adjusting for Plasmodium falciparum reinfection, clinical effectiveness at day 28 was 98.6% ([7,369/7,746] 95% confidence interval (CI) 98.3 to 98.9) in the per-protocol population. There was no indication that comorbidities or malnutrition adversely affected outcomes. The key study limitation was that postbaseline clinical biochemistry was only evaluated when clinically indicated. CONCLUSIONS: Pyronaridine-artesunate had good tolerability and effectiveness in a representative African population under conditions similar to everyday clinical practice. These findings support pyronaridine-artesunate as an operationally useful addition to the management of acute uncomplicated malaria. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03201770.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Artesunato/uso terapéutico , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Naftiridinas/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , África , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Artesunato/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/etiología , Niño , Preescolar , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Malaria/diagnóstico , Malaria/parasitología , Masculino , Naftiridinas/efectos adversos , Seguridad del Paciente , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The use of artemisinin derivatives has been recommended by the WHO guidelines in malaria treatment largely due to its rapid parasite clearance and safety profile. This case report details the development of delayed haemolysis and subsequent severe acute kidney injury (AKI) 13 days after commencing intravenous artesunate treatment for malaria in an Australian returned traveller. Delayed haemolysis may be an under-recognised complication following artesunate use and if severe, can be complicated by AKI. Therefore, close patient follow-up following treatment is required to ensure prompt recognition of this phenomenon.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Anemia Hemolítica/inducido químicamente , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Artesunato/efectos adversos , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Lesión Renal Aguda/metabolismo , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Administración Intravenosa , Anemia Hemolítica/complicaciones , Anemia Hemolítica/terapia , Australia , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Fluidoterapia , Hemólisis , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Enfermedad Relacionada con los ViajesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of pyronaridine-artesunate (PA) has been associated with scarce transaminitis in patients. This analysis aimed to evaluate the hepatic safety profile of repeated treatment with PA versus artemether-lumefantrine (AL) in patients with consecutive uncomplicated malaria episodes in Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. METHODS: This study analysed data from a clinical trial conducted from 2012 to 2015, in which participants with uncomplicated malaria were assigned to either PA or AL arms and followed up to 42 days. Subsequent malaria episodes within a 2-years follow up period were also treated with the same ACT initially allocated. Transaminases (AST/ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total and direct bilirubin were measured at days 0 (baseline), 3, 7, 28 and on some unscheduled days if required. The proportions of non-clinical hepatic adverse events (AEs) following first and repeated treatments with PA and AL were compared within study arms. The association of these AEs with retreatment in each arm was also determined using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 1379 malaria episodes were included in the intention to treat analysis with 60% of all cases occurring in the AL arm. Overall, 179 non-clinical hepatic AEs were recorded in the AL arm versus 145 in the PA arm. Elevated ALT was noted in 3.05% of treated malaria episodes, elevated AST 3.34%, elevated ALP 1.81%, and elevated total and direct bilirubin in 7.90% and 7.40% respectively. Retreated participants were less likely to experience elevated ALT and AST than first episode treated participants in both arms. One case of Hy's law condition was recorded in a first treated participant of the PA arm. Participants from the retreatment group were 76% and 84% less likely to have elevated ALT and AST, respectively, in the AL arm and 68% less likely to present elevated ALT in the PA arm. In contrast, they were almost 2 times more likely to experience elevated total bilirubin in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: Pyronaridine-artesunate and artemether-lumefantrine showed similar hepatic safety when used repeatedly in participants with uncomplicated malaria. Pyronaridine-artesunate represents therefore a suitable alternative to the current first line anti-malarial drugs in use in endemic areas. Trial registration Pan African Clinical Trials Registry. PACTR201105000286876.