Continuity of care and hospitalization frequency for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions after hearing-disability onset: a retrospective cohort study.

We assessed the effect of continuity of care (COC) on the frequency of hospitalization for Ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs) to estimate the impact of COC and hearing disability relative to the controls. This retrospective cohort study used claim data of Korean National Health Insurance Service - National Sample Cohort 2.0 DB. We used propensity score matching to determine a control group for the hearing disability group by age, sex, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. The hearing-impaired group included 720 participants, and the non-disabled control group, consisting of individuals without any form of disability, had 1,423 individuals. We used the frequency of hospitalization for ACSCs during one-year follow-up as the dependent variable for Poisson regression. We measured COC with the Bice-Boxerman Continuity of Care Index (COCI); higher COCI values represent better continuity of care, with COCI values ranging from 0 to 1. Poisson regression showed that disability status modifies the effect of COCI on the incidence of hospitalization. COCI = 1 reduced hospitalizations in people with hearing disabilities (adjusted Incidence Rate Ratio [aIRR]: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.20-0.44) but was not statistically significant for controls. In the COCI = 1 group, the effect of disability was not significant(aIRR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.83-1.44). Compared to people without disabilities, enhanced COC for people with hearing disabilities was more effective in preventing hospitalizations for ACSCs.

A descriptive study of first time outpatient public psychiatric care after 65 years.

BACKGROUND: Mental health in the older adults represents a public health issue, especially depression and suicide, and even more in the Brittany French region. Community Mental Health Centers (CMHC) are the front-line French psychiatric healthcare organizations, but the number, characteristics and trajectories of the older adults consulting there for the first time are unknown. METHOD: An exhaustive cross-sectional study from medical records about first-time consultants in any CMHC of the Guillaume Régnier Hospital Center in 2019, and quantifying and describing the 65 and over ones according to socio-demographic, clinical, geographic and trajectory criteria. RESULTS: This population represents 9.7% of all first consulting in CMHCs. We can note that 70.5% are female, 46.8% are living alone and 31.2% are widowed. These 3 rates are higher than in the general population. The main diagnosis we found is mood disorder (35.1%). Organic mental disorders are scarce (8.2%). Most people are referred by a general practitioner (53.4%) or a specialist/hospital center (23.7%). The main referral at the end is to CMHC care (73.6%). Only 20.0% had a referral to non-psychiatric health professionals (GP, coordination support teams, geriatrics, other professionals). Significant differences in the referral at the end exist between 65 and 74, who are more referred to CMHC professionals, and 75 and over, who are more frequently referred to non-psychiatric health professionals. Significant discrepancies about who referred are found according to community area-type. CONCLUSION: These results align with the literature about known health-related characteristics and the importance of depression in the older people. They question the link with non-psychiatric professionals, and the need to structure a homogeneous care organization in psychiatric care for the older adults with trained professionals, especially for the 75 and over.

Differences in COVID-19 Outpatient Antiviral Treatment Among Adults Aged ≥65 Years by Age Group - National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, United States, April 2022-September 2023.

Adults aged ≥65 years experience the highest risk for COVID-19-related hospitalization and death, with risk increasing with increasing age; outpatient antiviral treatment reduces the risk for these severe outcomes. Despite the proven benefit of COVID-19 antiviral treatment, information on differences in use among older adults with COVID-19 by age group is limited. Nonhospitalized patients aged ≥65 years with COVID-19 during April 2022-September 2023 were identified from the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. Differences in use of antiviral treatment among patients aged 65-74, 75-89, and ≥90 years were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between age and nonreceipt of antiviral treatment. Among 393,390 persons aged ≥65 years, 45.9% received outpatient COVID-19 antivirals, including 48.4%, 43.5%, and 35.2% among those aged 65-75, 76-89, and ≥90 years, respectively. Patients aged 75-89 and ≥90 years had 1.17 (95% CI = 1.15-1.19) and 1.54 (95% CI = 1.49-1.61) times the adjusted odds of being untreated, respectively, compared with those aged 65-74 years. Among 12,543 patients with severe outcomes, 2,648 (21.1%) had received an outpatient COVID-19 antiviral medication, compared with 177,874 (46.7%) of 380,847 patients without severe outcomes. Antiviral use is underutilized among adults ≥65 years; the oldest adults are least likely to receive treatment. To prevent COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality, increased use of COVID-19 antiviral medications among older adults is needed.

Generic dispensing rates for substitutable drugs prescribed by general practitioners compared with other private ambulatory specialists: A study based on a French national reimbursement database.

BACKGROUND: The use of generic drugs is a way for healthcare systems to reduce costs, particularly in ambulatory care. Several studies suggest that the prescriber's speciality is associated with the use of generic drugs, and that substitutable drugs prescribed by General Practitioners (GPs) are more often generic, but this association has never been studied in France. In the French legislative context, except in rare situations, all substitutable drugs prescribed should be dispensed in generic form. OBJECTIVES: Compare the generic drugs dispensing rate among substitutable drugs dispensed in community pharmacies prescribed by French private GPs with that of other private specialists, all other specialities combined (first objective) or each other speciality taken individually (second objective). METHODS: We used a sample of an open available semi-aggregated database from the 2019 French health insurance system database. We compared with logistic regression models GPs to all other specialities combined, then GPs to the 19 other specialties taken individually, only on the substitutable drugs they prescribe in common. RESULTS: In 2019, 53.4% of the drugs prescribed by French private ambulatory physicians were substitutable drugs, and 81.5% of them were dispensed in generic form. After adjustment, the generic dispensing rate for substitutable drugs was significantly higher for GPs than for other specialties (ORa 0.74 [IC95% 0.72-0.76]). Thirteen of the nineteen other specialities taken individually, such as endocrinologists (ORa 0.64 [IC95% 0.57-0.72]) and cardiologists (ORa 0.60 [0.56-0.63]) had significantly lower generic dispensing rates than GPs. No other speciality had a rate significantly higher than GPs. CONCLUSIONS: Substitutable drugs prescribed by French private GPs are more often dispensed in generic form than those from other private ambulatory specialties. To understand this result and optimise the use of generic drugs in outpatient settings, we need to study the different stages of drug use, from prescription by the physician to dispensing by the pharmacist and acceptance by the patient.

82% of substitutable drugs prescribed by French private general practitioners in 2019 were dispensed in generic form.No other ambulatory specialty rated significantly higher than general practitioners.Research is needed to study reasons for non-generic drug prescription in the context of legislative changes.

Predictors of medication regimen complexity and its impact on hemoglobin a1c in type 2 diabetes patients: a retrospective analysis in ambulatory care in Makkah City.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a widespread chronic disease that poses a significant management challenge due to the complexity of the associated medication regimens, which can have a considerable impact on patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES: Explore the complexity level of diabetes medications among patients with T2DM and to identify the predictors of medication regimen complexity (MRC) and its correlation with hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) levels. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. SETTING: An ambulatory care setting of a tertiary hospital in Makkah City, Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with T2DM referred to the diabetic clinic were identified and assessed for eligibility. The data were collected from patient electronic medical records between October 2022 and September 2023. The MRC Index was used to evaluate the complexity of the patients' medication regimens. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: MRC index scores and HbA1c levels. SAMPLE SIZE: 353 records of patients with T2DM. RESULTS: The analysis revealed that 61.8% (n=218) of patients had high MRC, with the dosing frequency contributing significantly to their MRC (mean=3.9, SD=1.9). Having polypharmacy and longstanding T2DM were predictors of high MRC (odds ratios=4.9 and 2.6, respectively; P≤.01). Additionally, there was an inverse association between the patients' diabetes-specific MRC index scores and their glycemic control (odds ratios=0.2, P<.001). CONCLUSION: The study findings highlight the importance of considering MRC in managing T2DM. Simplifying medication regimens and optimizing medication management strategies can improve patient outcomes. Further research is needed to explore interventions to reduce MRC and enhance diabetes management in this population. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study design measuring the MRC at a diabetes-specific level.

Optimal Pediatric Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing.

Importance: In the US, 50% of all pediatric outpatient antibiotics prescribed are unnecessary or inappropriate. Less is known about the appropriateness of pediatric outpatient antibiotic prescribing. Objective: To identify the overall percentage of outpatient antibiotic prescriptions that are optimal according to guideline recommendations for first-line antibiotic choice and duration. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study obtained data on any clinical encounter for a patient younger than 20 years with at least 1 outpatient oral antibiotic, intramuscular ceftriaxone, or penicillin prescription filled in the state of Tennessee from January 1 to December 31, 2022, from IQVIA's Longitudinal Prescription Claims and Medical Claims databases. Each clinical encounter was assigned a single diagnosis corresponding to the lowest applicable tier in a 3-tier antibiotic tier system. Antibiotics prescribed for tier 1 (nearly always required) or tier 2 (sometimes required) diagnoses were compared with published national guidelines. Antibiotics prescribed for tier 3 (rarely ever required) diagnoses were considered to be suboptimal for both choice and duration. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was the percentage of optimal antibiotic prescriptions consistent with guideline recommendations for first-line antibiotic choice and duration. Secondary outcomes were the associations of optimal prescribing by diagnosis, suboptimal antibiotic choice, and patient- and clinician-level factors (ie, age and Social Vulnerability Index) with optimal antibiotic choice, which were measured by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs calculated using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results: A total of 506 633 antibiotics were prescribed in 488 818 clinical encounters (for 247 843 females [50.7%]; mean [SD] age, 8.36 [5.5] years). Of these antibiotics, 21 055 (4.2%) were for tier 1 diagnoses, 288 044 (56.9%) for tier 2 diagnoses, and 197 660 (39.0%) for tier 3 diagnoses. Additionally, 194 906 antibiotics (38.5%) were optimal for antibiotic choice, 259 786 (51.3%) for duration, and 159 050 (31.4%) for both choice and duration. Acute otitis media (AOM) and pharyngitis were the most common indications, with 85 635 of 127 312 (67.3%) clinical encounters for AOM and 42 969 of 76 865 (55.9%) clinical encounters for pharyngitis being optimal for antibiotic choice. Only 257 of 4472 (5.7%) antibiotics prescribed for community-acquired pneumonia had a 5-day duration. Optimal antibiotic choice was more likely in patients who were younger (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98-0.98) and were less socially vulnerable (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.86). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that less than one-third of antibiotics prescribed to pediatric outpatients in Tennessee were optimal for choice and duration. Four stewardship interventions may be targeted: (1) reduce the number of prescriptions for tier 3 diagnoses, (2) increase optimal prescribing for AOM and pharyngitis, (3) provide clinician education on shorter antibiotic treatment courses for community-acquired pneumonia, and (4) promote optimal antibiotic prescribing in resource-limited settings.

From evidence to practice: real-world insights into outpatient management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: Diverticulitis is experiencing a significant increase in prevalence and its widespread in-hospital management results in a high burden on healthcare systems worldwide. This study compared inpatient and outpatient approach of acute non-complicated diverticulitis using a non-selected population in a real-world setting. METHODS: This observational retrospective study included all consecutive patients from two Portuguese institutions diagnosed between January 2017 and December 2021 with non-complicated diverticulitis according to the modified Hinchey Classification. The primary endpoints were to identify criteria for inpatient treatment and compare the outcomes on the basis of the treatment regimen. The secondary endpoints were to determine the predictive factors for clinical outcomes, focusing on treatment failure, pain recurrence, and the need for elective surgery following the initial episode. RESULTS: A total of 688 patients were included in this study, 437 treated as outpatients and 251 hospitalized. Inpatient management was significantly associated with higher preadmission American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p = 0.004), fever (p = 0.030), leukocytosis (p < 0.001), and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.001). No significant association was found between failure of conservative treatment and patient's age, ASA score, baseline CRP, presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and inpatient or outpatient treatment regimen. Pain recurrence was significantly associated with higher CRP levels (p = 0.049), inpatient treatment regime (p = 0.009) and post index episode mesalazine prescription (p = 0.006). Moreover, the need for elective surgery was significantly associated with the presence of previous episodes (p = 0.004) and pain recurrence (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis of the left colon experience successful conservative approach and can be safely managed in an ambulatory setting. Neither treatment failure, recurrence of pain, or need for posterior elective surgery are associated with outpatient treatment regimen.

Healthcare outcomes and dispositions in persons with obesity within emergency departments in Ontario, Canada: A cross-sectional analysis of the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS), 2018-2022.

INTRODUCTION: The experience of persons with obesity (PwO) in the Canadian healthcare setting has not been widely studied. The objective of this study was to assess care in PwO in emergency departments in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: This secondary analysis made use of 2018-2022 Canadian Institute for Health Information's National Ambulatory Care Reporting System. The sample consisted of 4547 individuals with an obesity diagnosis, and 4547 controls who were matched for sex, age, and main diagnosis. Ordinal logistic and multiple linear regression analyses were used to assess triage scores, wait times, and length of stay. RESULTS: PwO had 4.8 minutes longer wait time for a physician initial assessment (p<0.01), 3.56 hours longer length of stay in the emergency department (p<0.0001), and 55% greater odds (OR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.43-1.68) of having a less urgent triage score compared to controls matched for main diagnosis. When further matched for triage score, PwO experienced over three hours longer length of stay for triage level 2 (emergent, p<0.01), five hours longer for triage level 3 (urgent, p<0.01), and nearly two hours longer for triage level 4 (less urgent, p<0.05) cases. CONCLUSION: PwO were rated as less urgent and experienced longer wait times and length of stay, compared to controls matched by sex, age, and main diagnosis. Additional research is needed to confirm the consistency of these findings in other provinces/territories, and to examine clinical outcomes, and the underlying reasons for differences.

The gender gap in outpatient care for non-communicable diseases in Mexico between 2006 and 2022.

BACKGROUND: Equitable health service utilization is key to health systems' optimal performance and universal health coverage. The evidence shows that men and women use health services differently. However, current analyses have failed to explore these differences in depth and investigate how such gender disparities vary by service type. This study examined the gender gap in the use of outpatient health services by Mexican adults with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) from 2006 to 2022. METHODS: A cross-sectional population-based analysis of data drawn from National Health and Nutrition Surveys of 2006, 2011-12, 2020, 2021, and 2022 was performed. Information was gathered from 300,878 Mexican adults aged 20 years and older who either had some form of public health insurance or were uninsured. We assessed the use of outpatient health services provided by qualified personnel for adults who reported having experienced an NCD and seeking outpatient care in the 2 weeks before the survey. Outpatient service utilization was disaggregated into four categories: non-use, use of public health services from providers not corresponding to the user's health insurance, use of public health services from providers not corresponding to the user's health insurance, and use of private services. This study reported the mean percentages (with 95% confidence intervals [95% CIs]) for each sociodemographic covariate associated with service utilization, disaggregated by gender. The percentages were reported for each survey year, the entire study period, the types of service use, and the reasons for non-use, according to the type of health problem. The gender gap in health service utilization was calculated using predictive margins by gender, type of disease, and survey year, and adjusted through a multinomial logistic regression model. RESULTS: Overall, we found that women were less likely to fall within the "non-use" category than men during the entire study period (21.8% vs. 27.8%, P < 0.001). However, when taking into account the estimated gender gap measured by incremental probability and comparing health needs caused by NCDs against other conditions, compared with women, men had a 7.4% lower incremental likelihood of falling within the non-use category (P < 0.001), were 10.8% more likely to use services from providers corresponding to their health insurance (P < 0.001), and showed a 12% lower incremental probability of using private services (P < 0.001). Except for the gap in private service utilization, which tended to shrink, the others remained stable throughout the period analyzed. CONCLUSION: Over 16 years of outpatient service utilization by Mexican adults requiring care for NCDs has been characterized by the existence of gender inequalities. Women are more likely either not to receive care or resort to using private outpatient services, often resulting in catastrophic out-of-pocket expenses for them and their families. Such inequalities are exacerbated by the segmented structure of the Mexican health system, which provides health insurance conditional on formal employment participation. These findings should be considered as a key factor in reorienting NCD health policies and programs from a gender perspective.

Outpatient use of antibiotics in uncomplicated diverticulitis decreases hospital admissions.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, antibiotics use in uncomplicated acute diverticulitis (AD) has been controversial in Europe. The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) in their 2015 guidelines recommend their selective use. Our study highlights their role in outpatient management. METHODS: We queried the Diamond Network through TriNetX-Research Network including 92 healthcare organizations. We included large intestine diverticulitis without perforation, abscess or bleeding. Exclusion criteria included any of sepsis criteria, CRP > 15 mg/L, immunodeficiency or HIV, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, history of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes or any of the following in the 3 months before study date; clostridium difficile (C. diff) infection, diverticulitis or antibiotics. Patients with AD were divided into two cohorts; patients on antibiotics, and patients not on antibiotics. Cohorts were compared after propensity-score matching (PSM). RESULTS: 214,277 patients met inclusion criteria. 58.9% received antibiotics, and 41% did not. After PSM, both cohorts had 84,320. Rate of hospital admission was lower in the antibiotic group (3.3% vs 4.2%, p < .001). There was a statistical difference between ICU admission (0.1% vs 0.15%, p < .01) and the rate of bowel perforation, peritonitis, abscess formation or bleeding (1.3% vs 1.4%, p = .044). There was no difference in mortality (0.1% vs 0.1%, p = .11), C. diff (0.1% vs 0.1%, p = .9), colectomies (0.2% vs 0.2%, p = .33), or Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) (0.1% vs 0.1%, p = .28). CONCLUSION: Outpatient use of antibiotics in patients with uncomplicated AD is associated with lower rates of hospital admissions and complications without changing mortality rate or surgical intervention.

Acute effects of ambient nitrogen dioxide pollution on outpatient visits for neurological diseases in Xinxiang, China.

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence suggests that exposure to air pollution acts as a potential trigger for neurological diseases (NDs), yet the current knowledge regarding the impact of ambient nitrogen dioxide (NO2) on the patients with NDs remains limited. In this study, we conducted a time-series study to evaluate the association between short-term exposure to NO2 and hospital visits for NDs in Xinxiang, China. METHODS: An over-dispersed Poisson generalized additive model was used to analyze the association between ambient NO2 concentrations and daily outpatient visits for NDs from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. The model adjusted for meteorological factors, temporal trends, day of the week, and public holidays. The concentrations of air pollutants were collected from four air quality stations in Xinxiang. RESULTS: A total of 38, 865 outpatient visits for NDs were retrieved during the study period. 86.5% of the patients were below the age of 65 years. It was revealed that a 10 µg/m3 increase in NO2 at lag 0 was associated with a significant rise of 1.50% (95% CI: 0.45-2.56%) in outpatient visits for NDs, which was stronger during the cold season. However, the overall results from stratified analyses did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term exposure to NO2 is associated with increased outpatient visits for NDs. These findings underscore the need for implementing mitigating measures to reduce the neurological health effects of air pollutants.

Prescriber-level surveillance of outpatient antimicrobial consumption to enable targeted antimicrobial stewardship: a nationwide observational study, Switzerland, 2015 to 2022.

BackgroundIn Europe and other high-income countries, antibiotics are mainly prescribed in the outpatient setting, which consists of primary, specialist and hospital-affiliated outpatient care. Established surveillance platforms report antimicrobial consumption (AMC) on aggregated levels and the contribution of the different prescriber groups is unknown.AimTo determine the contribution of different prescribers to the overall outpatient AMC in Switzerland.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study using claims data from one large Swiss health insurance company, covering the period from 2015 to 2022. We analysed antibiotic prescriptions (ATC code J01) prescribed in the Swiss outpatient setting. Results were reported as defined daily doses per 1,000 inhabitants per day (DID) and weighted according to the total population of Switzerland based on census data.ResultsWe analysed 3,663,590 antibiotic prescriptions from 49 prescriber groups. Overall, AMC ranged from 9.12 DID (2015) to 7.99 DID (2022). General internal medicine (40.1% of all prescribed DID in 2022), hospital-affiliated outpatient care (20.6%), group practices (17.3%), paediatrics (5.4%) and gynaecology (3.7%) were the largest prescriber groups. Primary care accounted for two-thirds of the prescribed DID. Quantity and type of antibiotics prescribed varied between the prescriber groups. Broad-spectrum penicillins, tetracyclines and macrolides were the most prescribed antibiotic classes.ConclusionPrimary care contributed considerably less to AMC than anticipated, and hospital-affiliated outpatient care emerged as an important prescriber. Surveillance at the prescriber level enables the identification of prescribing patterns within all prescriber groups, offering unprecedented visibility and allowing a more targeted antibiotic stewardship according to prescriber groups.

A Hybrid Markov-SPC Approach to Assess Cost Differences in Urgent Care Utilization Using Patient-Reported Data in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Cost is a key outcome in quality and value, but it is often difficult to estimate reliably and efficiently for use in real-time improvement efforts. We describe a method using patient-reported outcomes (PROs), Markov modeling, and statistical process control (SPC) analytics in a real-time cost-estimation prototype designed to assess cost differences between usual care and improvement conditions in a national multicenter improvement collaborative-the IBD Qorus Learning Health System (LHS). METHODS: The IBD Qorus Learning Health System (LHS) collects PRO data, including emergency department utilization and hospitalizations from patients prior to their clinical visits. This data is aggregated monthly at center and collaborative levels, visualized using Statistical Process Control (SPC) analytics, and used to inform improvement efforts. A Markov model was developed by Almario et al to estimate annualized per patient cost differences between usual care (baseline) and improvement (intervention) time periods and then replicated at monthly intervals. We then applied moving average SPC analyses to visualize monthly iterative cost estimations and assess the variation and statistical reliability of these estimates over time. RESULTS: We have developed a real-time Markov-informed SPC visualization prototype which uses PRO data to analyze and monitor monthly annualized per patient cost savings estimations over time for the IBD Qorus LHS. Validation of this prototype using claims data is currently underway. CONCLUSION: This new approach using PRO data and hybrid Markov-SPC analysis can analyze and visualize near real-time estimates of cost differences over time. Pending successful validation against a claims data standard, this approach could more comprehensively inform improvement, advocacy, and strategic planning efforts.

Assessment of short-term effects of ambient air pollution exposure on osteoarthritis outpatient visits.

The association of short-term ambient air pollution exposure with osteoarthritis (OA) outpatient visits has been unclear and no study has assessed the modifying roles of district-level characteristics in the association between ambient air pollution exposure and OA outpatient visits. We investigated the cumulative associations of ambient air pollution exposure with daily OA outpatient visits and vulnerable factors influencing the associations using data from 16 districts of Beijing, China during 2013-2019. A total of 18,351,795 OA outpatient visits were included in the analyses. An increase of 10 µg/m3 in fine particulate matter (PM2.5), inhalable particulate matter (PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), maximum 8-hour moving-average ozone (8 h-O3), and 0.1 mg/m3 in carbon monoxide (CO) at representative lag days were associated with significant increases of 0.31 %, 0.06 %, 0.77 %, 0.87 %, 0.30 %, and 0.48 % in daily OA outpatient visits, respectively. Considerable OA outpatient visits were attributable to short-term ambient air pollution exposure. In addition, low temperature and high humidity aggravated ambient air pollution associated OA outpatient visits. District-level characteristics, such as population density, green coverage rate, and urbanization rate modified the risk of OA outpatient visits associated with air pollution exposure. These findings highlight the significance of controlling ambient air pollution during the urbanization process, which is useful in policy formation and implementation.

Pre- and Post-admission Care for Children Hospitalized With Skin and Soft Tissue Infections.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are among the most common indications for pediatric hospitalization, little is known about outpatient care received for SSTI before and after hospitalization. We assessed peri-hospitalization care for SSTI, including antibiotic exposures and their impact on hospital length of stay (LOS). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 1229 SSTI hospitalizations in 2019 from children aged 1-to-18 years enrolled in Medicaid from 10 US states included in the Merative Marketscan Medicaid database. We characterized health service utilization (outpatient visits, laboratory and diagnostic tests, antibiotic exposures) 14 days before and 30 days after hospitalization and evaluated the effects of pre-hospitalization care on hospital LOS with linear regression. RESULTS: Only 43.1% of children hospitalized with SSTI had a preceding outpatient visit with a SSTI diagnosis, 69.8% of which also filled prescription for an antibiotic. Median LOS for SSTI admission was 2 days (interquartile range 1-3). Pre-hospitalization visits with a diagnosis of SSTI were associated with a 0.7 day reduction (95% confidence interval: 0.6-0.81) in LOS (P < .001), but pre-hospital antibiotic exposure alone had no effect on LOS. Most children (81.7%) filled antibiotic prescriptions after hospital discharge and 74.5% had post-discharge ambulatory visits. CONCLUSIONS: Although most children did not receive pre-admission care for SSTI, those that did had a shorter hospitalization. Further investigation is necessary on how to optimize access and use of outpatient care for SSTI.

Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Outpatient Visits for Diabetic Retinopathy in Japan: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: Long-term ramifications of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on various care-seeking characteristics of patients with diabetic retinopathy remain unclear. This study aimed to identify risk factors for dropout from regular fundus examinations (RFEs) in patients with diabetic retinopathy in Japan. Methods: We extracted demographic and health checkup data (April 2018 to March 2021) from the JMDC database. Patients with diabetes identified using diagnosis-related and medication codes were included. The dropout and continuation groups included patients who discontinued and continued to undergo RFEs during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, respectively. Results: The number of RFEs was significantly lower during the mild lockdown period (April and May 2020) than during the prepandemic period. Of the 14,845 patients with diabetes, 2333 (15.7%) dropped out of RFEs during the pandemic, whereas before the pandemic, of the 11,536 patients with diabetes, 1666 (14.4%) dropped out of RFEs (P = 0.004). Factors associated with dropout in the multivariate logistic regression analysis included younger age, male sex, high triglyceride levels, high γ-glutamyl transpeptidase levels, smoking habit, alcohol consumption, weight gain of more than 10 kg since the age of 20 years, and certain stages of lifestyle improvement. Factors associated with continuation included low body mass index and high glycosylated hemoglobin levels. Conclusions: Our findings can assist in identifying patients with diabetes at risk of dropout. Translational Relevance: These results have implications for public health and identifying patients with diabetes at risk of dropout. Education and tailored monitoring regimens could be pivotal role in fostering adherence.

Segregation by Payer in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Ambulatory Care Sites.

Importance: Many teaching hospitals in the US segregate patients by insurance status, with resident clinics primarily composed of publicly insured or uninsured patients and faculty practices seeing privately insured patients. The prevalence of this model in obstetrics and gynecology residencies is unknown. Objectives: To examine the prevalence of payer-based segregation in obstetrics and gynecology residency ambulatory care sites nationally and to compare residents' and program directors' perceptions of differences in quality of care between payer-segregated and integrated sites. Design, Setting, and Participants: This national survey study included all 6060 obstetrics and gynecology residents and 293 obstetrics and gynecology residency program directors in the US as of January 2023. The proportion of program directors reporting payer segregation was calculated to characterize the national prevalence of this model in obstetrics and gynecology. Perceived differences in care quality were compared between residents and program directors at payer-segregated sites. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary measure was prevalence of payer-based segregation in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs in the US as reported by residency program directors. The secondary measure was resident and program director perceptions of care quality in these ambulatory care settings. Before study initiation, the study hypothesis was that residents and program directors at ambulatory sites with payer-based segregation would report more disparity in perceived health care quality between resident and faculty practices compared with those from integrated sites. Results: A total of 251 residency program directors (response rate, 85.7%) and 3471 residents (response rate, 57.3%) were included in the study. Resident respondent demographics reflected demographics of obstetrics and gynecology residents nationally in terms of racial and ethnic distribution (6 [0.2%] American Indian or Alaska Native; 425 [13.0%] Asian; 239 [7.3%] Black or African American; 290 [8.9%] Hispanic, Latinx, or Spanish; 7 [0.2%] Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander; 2052 [62.7%] non-Hispanic White; 49 [1.5%] multiracial; 56 [1.7%] other [any race not listed]; and 137 [4.2%] preferred not to say) and geographic distribution (regional prevalence of payer-based segregation: 36 of 53 [67.9%] in the Northeast, 35 of 44 [79.5%] in the Midwest, 43 of 67 [64.2%] in the South, and 13 of 22 [59.1%] in the West), with 2837 respondents (86.9%) identifying as female. Among program directors, 127 (68.3%) reported payer-based segregation in ambulatory care. University programs were more likely to report payer-based segregation compared with community, hybrid, and military programs (63 of 85 [74.1%] vs 31 of 46 [67.4%], 32 of 51 [62.7%], and 0, respectively; P = .04). Residents at payer-segregated programs were less likely than their counterparts at integrated programs to report equal or higher care quality from residents compared with faculty (1662 [68.7%] vs 692 [81.6%] at segregated and integrated programs, respectively; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of residents and residency program directors, payer-based segregation was prevalent in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs, particularly at university programs. These findings reveal an opportunity for structural reform to promote more equitable care in residency training programs.

[Appropriateness of requests for urgent outpatient cardiological services and impact on waiting lists: the experience of the Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale of the Province of Lodi]. / Appropriatezza delle richieste di prestazioni cardiologiche ambulatoriali urgenti e impatto sulle liste di attesa: l'esperienza dell'Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale della Provincia di Lodi.

BACKGROUND: The Cardiology Complex Structure of the Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) of Lodi, Italy, assists patients with clinical conditions ranging from emergency to chronicity. The model of Homogeneous Waiting Groups should guide the appropriateness of prescriptions categorized as U (urgent), B (brief), D (deferrable), and P (programmable). This study aims to describe and analyze the characteristics of prescription and delivery of clinical and instrumental cardiology outpatient services with U and B priority during the November 2023-January 2024 quarter, paying particular attention to the clinical appropriateness of prescribing. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted. Computerized data were anonymously extracted from the company's Management Control and provided with the authorization of the Data Protection Officer. RESULTS: During the observed quarter, the Cardiology Complex Structure provided 7379 services for outpatients. Out of 123 U services, 94 (76.4%) were managed through SBC (Single Booking Center) and 29 (23.6%) were managed outside the SBC. From 529 services with B priority, 504 (95%) were managed through SBC and 25 (5%) outside the SBC. Requests with U priority mainly referred to ECG (n = 50; 40.6%) and first cardiological visit (n = 46; 37.4%). Fifty percent of U and B requests were prescribed by 4% and 8% of general practitioners, respectively. The prescribed priority was correct for 13% of requests (n = 64). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a vastly inappropriate use of resources allocated to urgent outpatient cardiological services. Actions aimed at promoting the adherence to the Homogeneous Waiting Groups Manual and enhancing telemedicine services, currently limited to heart failure, are necessary for resource optimization in cardiology within the ASST of Lodi.

Longer-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA)-related healthcare: a province-based study.

RATIONALE: Following marked reductions in sleep medicine care early in the COVID-19 pandemic, there is limited information about the recovery of these services. We explored long-term trends in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) health services and service backlogs during the pandemic compared with pre-pandemic levels in Ontario (the most populous province of Canada). METHODS: In this retrospective population-based study using Ontario (Canada) health administrative data on adults, we compared rates of polysomnograms (PSGs), outpatient visits and positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy purchase claims during the pandemic (March 2020 to December 2022) to pre-pandemic rates (2015-2019). We calculated projected rates using monthly seasonal time series auto-regressive integrated moving-average models based on similar periods in previous years. Service backlogs were estimated from the difference between projected and observed rates. RESULTS: Compared with historical data, all service rates decreased at first during March to May 2020 and subsequently increased. By December 2022, observed service rates per 100 000 persons remained lower than projected for PSGs (September to December 2022: 113 vs 141, 95% CI: 121 to 163) and PAP claims (September to December 2022: 50 vs 60, 95% CI: 51 to 70), and returned to projected for outpatient OSA visits. By December 2022, the service backlog was 193 078 PSGs (95% CI: 139 294 to 253 075) and 57 321 PAP claims (95% CI: 27 703 to 86 938). CONCLUSION: As of December 2022, there was a sustained reduction in OSA-related health services in Ontario, Canada. The resulting service backlog has likely worsened existing problems with underdiagnosis and undertreatment of OSA and supports the adoption of flexible care delivery models for OSA that include portable technologies.

Ambulatory Care Utilization Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Depression.

The association between depression and ambulatory care utilization is unclear. The authors sought to determine the association between untreated depression and ambulatory care utilization, including the extent to which care is fragmented, or spread across providers. The authors conducted a longitudinal study using data from the nationwide REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study linked to Medicare fee-for-service claims (N = 1412). They categorized participants into three study groups, based on self-reported depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale score ≥ 4) and a medication inventory for antidepressants: Symptomatic Untreated (SU), Symptomatic Treated (ST), and Asymptomatic Treated (AT). The authors used descriptive statistics to characterize ambulatory care patterns by study group. They determined the association between the study group and fragmentation score (with high fragmentation defined as a reversed Bice-Boxerman Index ≥ 0.85) using multivariable logistic regression. All groups had similar numbers of primary care visits, but the SU group had the fewest specialist visits. The SU group had the lowest proportion of participants who received care from a psychiatrist (3.4% vs. 10.7% for ST and 11.9% for AT, pairwise P-values < 0.001). The SU group was the least likely to have highly fragmented care (adjusted odds ratio 0.68; 95% confidence interval 0.48, 0.95, compared with the ST group). These results suggest that older adults with untreated depression are not engaged in excess care-seeking behaviors. Rather, the results suggest undertreatment of depression in primary care and underutilization of psychiatric care.