RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postdischarge primary care follow-up is associated with lower readmission rates after medical hospitalizations. However, the effect of primary care utilization on readmission has not been studied in surgical patients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older undergoing major inpatient diagnostic or therapeutic procedures (n = 3,552,906) from 2017 through 2018, examining the association between postdischarge primary care visits within 14 days of discharge (primary exposure), and Annual Wellness Visits in the year prior (secondary exposure), with 30-day unplanned readmission (primary outcome), emergency department visits, and mortality (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: Overall, 9.5% (n = 336,837) had postdischarge visits within 14 days, 2.9% (n = 104,571) had Annual Wellness Visits in the year preceding the procedure, 9.5% (n = 336,401) were readmitted, 9% (n = 319,054) had emergency department visits, and 0.6% (n = 22,103) of the cohort died within 30 days. Our fully adjusted propensity-matched proportional hazards Cox regression analysis showed that postdischarge visits were associated with a 5% lower risk of readmission (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.97), 43% higher risk of emergency department use (HR, 1.43, 95% CI, 1.40-1.46) and no difference in mortality risk (HR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.90-1.06), compared with not having a visit within 14 days of discharge. In a separate set of regression models, Annual Wellness Visits were associated with a 9% lower risk of readmission (HR, 0.91, 95% CI, 0.88-0.95), 45% higher risk of emergency department utilization (HR, 1.45, 95% CI, 1.40-1.49) and an 18% lower mortality risk (HR, 0.82, 95% CI, 0.75-0.89) compared with no Annual Wellness Visit in the year before the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Both postdischarge visits and the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit appear to be extremely underutilized among the older surgical population. In those patients who do utilize primary care, compared with propensity-matched patients who do not, our study suggests primary care use is associated with modestly lower readmission rates. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether targeted primary care involvement can reduce readmission.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Medicare , Readmisión del Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Atención Perioperativa/tendencias , Alta del Paciente/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Patients who present with lower extremity ischemia are frequently anemic and the optimal transfusion threshold for this cohort remains controversial. We sought to evaluate the impact of blood transfusion on postoperative major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including myocardial infarction, dysrhythmia, stroke, congestive heart failure, and 30-day mortality for these patients. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent infra-inguinal bypass at our institution from 2011 to 2020 were included. Perioperative red blood cell transfusion was the primary exposure, and the primary outcome was MACE. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to assess the impact of patient and procedural variables, including red blood cell transfusion, stratified by hemoglobin (Hgb) nadir: <7, 7-8, and >8 g/dL. RESULTS: Of the 287 patients reviewed for analysis, 146 (50.9%) had a perioperative transfusion (mean: 1.6 ± 3 units). Patients who received a transfusion had a mean nadir Hgb of 8.3 ± 1.0 g/dL, compared to 10.1 ± 1.7 g/dL without a transfusion. The overall incidence of MACE was 15.7% (45 of 287 patients). Univariate analysis demonstrated that MACE was associated with blood transfusion (P = 0.009), lower Hgb nadir (P = 0.02), and higher blood loss (P = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, transfusion was independently associated with MACE for patients with a Hgb nadir >8 g/dL (OR: 3.09; P = 0.006), but not for patients with Hgb nadir 7-8 g/dL (OR: 0.818; P = 0.77). Additionally, patients with MACE had significantly longer length of hospital stay than for patients without (13 vs. 7.7 days, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing infra-inguinal bypass, receiving a red blood cell transfusion with a Hgb nadir >8 g/dL was associated with a 3-fold increase in MACE, with nearly twice the length of stay. For patients with a Hgb 7-8 g/dL, transfusion did not increase or reduce the incidence of MACE. These findings suggest no benefit of blood transfusion for patients with Hgb nadir >7 g/dL and harm for Hgb >8 g/dL, however causation cannot be proven due to the retrospective nature of the study and randomized studies are needed to confirm or refute these findings.
Asunto(s)
Anemia/complicaciones , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/efectos adversos , Isquemia/cirugía , Atención Perioperativa , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Injerto Vascular , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia/sangre , Anemia/diagnóstico , Anemia/mortalidad , Biomarcadores/sangre , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/mortalidad , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Isquemia/complicaciones , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/mortalidad , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Perioperativa/efectos adversos , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Injerto Vascular/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on older adults (age ≥65 years) undergoing surgery who had an inpatient do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order, and the association between timing of DNR order and outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 1976 older adults in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program geriatric-specific database (2014-2018). Patients were stratified by institution of a DNR order during their surgical admission ("new-DNR" vs. "no-DNR"), and matched by age (±3 years), frailty score (range: 0-1), and procedure. The main outcome of interest was occurrence of death or hospice transition (DoH) ≤30 postoperative days; this was analyzed using bivariate and multivariable methods. RESULTS: One in 36 older adults had a new-DNR order. After matching, there were 988 new-DNR and 988 no-DNR patients. Median age and frailty score were 82 years and 0.2, respectively. Most underwent orthopedic (47.6%), general (37.6%), and vascular procedures (8.4%). Overall DoH rate ≤30 days was 44.4% for new-DNR versus 4.0% for no-DNR patients (p < 0.001). DoH rate for patients who had DNR orders placed in the preoperative, day of surgery, and postoperative setting was 16.7%, 23.3%, and 64.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, compared to no-DNR patients, those with a new-DNR order had a 28-fold higher adjusted odds of DoH (odds ratio [OR] 28.1, 95% confidence interval: 13.0-60.1, p < 0.001); however, odds were 10-fold lower if the DNR order was placed preoperatively (OR: 5.8, p = 0.003) versus postoperatively (OR: 52.9, p < 0.001). Traditional markers of poor postoperative outcomes such as American Society of Anesthesiologists class and emergency surgery were not independently associated with DoH. CONCLUSIONS: An inpatient DNR order was associated with risk of DoH independent of traditional markers of poor surgical outcomes. Further research is needed to understand factors leading to a DNR order that may aid early recognition of high-risk older adults undergoing surgery.
Asunto(s)
Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Órdenes de Resucitación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion can induce immunosuppression, which can then increase the susceptibility to postoperative infection. However, studies in different types of surgery show conflicting results regarding this effect. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary referral centre, we included adult patients undergoing clean-contaminated surgery from 2014 to 2018. Patients who received allogeneic RBC transfusion from preoperative Day 30 to postoperative Day 30 were included into the transfusion group. The control group was matched for the type of surgery in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was infection within 30 days after surgery, which was defined by healthcare-associated infection, and identified mainly based on antibiotic regimens, microbiology tests, and medical notes. RESULTS: Among the 8098 included patients, 1525 (18.8%) developed 1904 episodes of postoperative infection. Perioperative RBC transfusion was associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection after controlling for 27 confounders by multivariable regression analysis (odds ratio [OR]: 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39-1.84; P<0.001) and propensity score weighing (OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.45-1.85; P<0.001) and matching (OR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.43-2.01; P<0.001), and a dose-response relationship was observed. The transfusion group also showed higher risks of surgical site infection, pneumonia, bloodstream infection, multiple infections, intensive care admission, unplanned reoperation, prolonged postoperative length of hospital stay, and all-cause death. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative allogeneic RBC transfusion is associated with an increased risk of infection after clean-contaminated surgery in a dose-response manner. Close monitoring of infections and enhanced prophylactic strategies should be considered after transfusion.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/efectos adversos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Atención Perioperativa/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/inmunología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas/inmunología , Infecciones Bacterianas/mortalidad , Cuidados Críticos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/mortalidad , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Readmisión del Paciente , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Neumonía Bacteriana/inmunología , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/inmunología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Factores de Tiempo , Trasplante Homólogo/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Atención Perioperativa , Animales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidad , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico , Cardiopatías Congénitas/mortalidad , Cardiopatías Congénitas/fisiopatología , Humanos , Atención Perioperativa/efectos adversos , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate survival outcomes associated with perioperative allogeneic red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing surgery. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science Core Collection were queried for English-language articles until May 28, 2020. Studies evaluating long-term outcomes of RBCT compared with no transfusion in adults with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing pancreatectomy were included. E-value sensitivity analysis assessed the potential for unmeasured confounders to overcome these findings. RESULTS: Of 4379 citations, 5 retrospective cohort studies were included. Three studies reported shorter recurrence-free survival by 1 to 5 months with RBCT. Two studies found shorter disease-specific survival by 5 to 13 months with RBCT. Overall survival was reduced by 5 to 7 months with RBCT in 3 studies. All multivariable findings associated with RBCT could be readily overcome unmeasured confounding on sensitivity analysis. Confounding in baseline characteristics resulted in high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Imprecision, unmeasured confounding, small effect sizes, and overall low quality of the available literature result in uncertainty regarding the effect of transfusion on recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival in patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancer. Randomized trials are needed to determine if there is a causal relationship between transfusion and survival after pancreatic resection.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirugía , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Atención Perioperativa , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidad , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/efectos adversos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/mortalidad , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreatectomía/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Atención Perioperativa/efectos adversos , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
No patient arrives at the hospital to undergo general anesthesia for its own sake. Anesthesiology is a symbiont specialty, with the primary mission of preventing physical and psychological pain, easing anxiety, and shepherding physiologic homeostasis so that other care may safely progress. For most elective surgeries, the patient-anesthesiologist relationship begins shortly before and ends after the immediate perioperative period. While this may tempt anesthesiologists to defer goals of care discussions to our surgical or primary care colleagues, we have both an ethical and a practical imperative to share this responsibility. Since the early 1990s, the American College of Surgeons (ACS), the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and the Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses (AORN) have mandated a "required reconsideration" of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders. Key ethical considerations and guiding principles informing this "required reconsideration" have been extensively discussed in the literature and include respect for patient autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. In this article, we address how well these principles and guidelines are translated into daily clinical practice and how often anesthesiologists actually discuss goals of care or potential limitations to life-sustaining medical treatments (LSMTs) before administering anesthesia or sedation. Having done so, we review how often providers implement goal-concordant care, that is, care that reflects and adheres to the stated patient wishes. We conclude with describing several key gaps in the literature on goal-concordance of perioperative care for patients with limitations on LSMT and summarize novel strategies and promising efforts described in recent literature to improve goal-concordance of perioperative care.
Asunto(s)
Directivas Anticipadas , Anestesia General , Anestesiólogos , Atención Perioperativa , Rol Profesional , Órdenes de Resucitación , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Anestesia General/mortalidad , Anestesia General/normas , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Adhesión a Directriz , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Atención Perioperativa/efectos adversos , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Atención Perioperativa/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Red blood cell transfusions are common in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Yet, to adequately balance their risks and benefits, clinicians must understand how transfusions may affect long-term outcomes. We aimed to determine if perioperative red blood cell transfusions are associated with a higher risk of all-cause and cancer-specific death among patients who underwent gastrointestinal cancer resection. METHOD: We identified a population-based cohort of patients who underwent gastrointestinal cancer resection in Ontario, Canada (2007-2019). All-cause death was compared between transfused and nontransfused patients using Cox proportional hazards regression, while cancer-specific death was compared with competing risk regression. RESULT: A total of 74,962 patients (mean age, 67.7 years; 55.4% male; 79.7% colorectal cancer) had gastrointestinal cancer surgery during the study period; 20.8% received perioperative red blood cell transfusions. Patients who received red blood cell transfusions had increased hazards of all-cause and cancer-specific death relative to patients who did not (hazard ratio: 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.34-1.44; cause-specific hazard ratio: 1.36, 1.30-1.43). The adjusted risk of all-cause death was higher in early follow-up intervals (3-6 months postoperatively) but remained elevated in each interval over 5 years. The association persisted after restricting to patients without postoperative complications or bleeding and was robust to unmeasured confounding. CONCLUSION: Red blood cell transfusion among patients with gastrointestinal cancer is associated with increased all-cause death. This was observed long beyond the immediate postoperative period and independent of short-term postoperative morbidity and mortality. These findings should help clinicians balance the risks and benefits of transfusion before well-designed trials are conducted in this patient population.
Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Eritrocitos/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/mortalidad , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Anciano , Causas de Muerte , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/efectos adversos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Ontario/epidemiología , Atención Perioperativa/efectos adversos , Atención Perioperativa/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo Perioperatorio , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Pediatric anesthesia is large part of anesthesia clinical practice. Children, parents and anesthesiologists fear anesthesia because of the risk of acute morbidity and mortality. Modern anesthesia in otherwise healthy children above 1 year of age in developed countries has become very safe due to recent advance in pharmacology, intensive education, and training as well as centralization of care. In contrast, anesthesia in these children in low-income countries is associated with a high risk of mortality due to lack of basic resources and adequate training of health care providers. Anesthesia for neonates and toddlers is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Anesthesia-related (near) critical incidents occur in 5% of anesthetic procedures and are largely dependent on the skills and up-to-date knowledge of the whole perioperative team in the specific needs for children. An investment in continuous medical education of the perioperative staff is required and international standard operating protocols for common procedures and critical situations should be defined.
Asunto(s)
Anestesiología/normas , Investigación Biomédica/normas , Pediatría/normas , Atención Perioperativa/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Anestesia/mortalidad , Anestesia/normas , Investigación Biomédica/métodos , Humanos , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Perioperative chemotherapy improves overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared with surgery alone in patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJA). The addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (GC), and we aimed to explore its role in the perioperative setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This Spanish, multicentre, open-label phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of perioperative capecitabine, oxaliplatin and trastuzumab (XELOX-T) in patients with HER2-positive resectable GA or GEJA. The primary end-point was 18-months DFS; and secondary end-points included pathological complete response (pCR) rate, R0 resection rate, OS and toxicity (NCT01130337). RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were included. After three cycles of preoperative treatment, 14 patients (38% of the intention-to-treat population) had partial response and 18 (50%) had stable disease. Surgery was performed in 31 patients: 28 (90%) had R0 resection, three (9.6%) had a pCR and three (9.6%) died due to surgical complications. A total of 24 patients received post-operative XELOX-T, 22 of whom completed trastuzumab maintenance. Main grade III/IV toxicities included diarrhoea (33%), nausea and vomiting (8%). After a median follow-up of 24.1 months, 18-month DFS was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53-83%); and an update after 102 months of follow-up showed a median OS of 79.9 months and a 60-month OS of 58% (95% CI, 40-73%). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that perioperative XELOX-T in patients with HER2-positive GA and GEJA is feasible and active. Further investigation in randomised studies is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Capecitabina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Unión Esofagogástrica/efectos de los fármacos , Unión Esofagogástrica/cirugía , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Atención Perioperativa , Receptor ErbB-2/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Trastuzumab/uso terapéutico , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Capecitabina/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Unión Esofagogástrica/metabolismo , Unión Esofagogástrica/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxaliplatino/efectos adversos , Atención Perioperativa/efectos adversos , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , España , Neoplasias Gástricas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Factores de Tiempo , Trastuzumab/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The survival benefits of perioperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) and perioperative chemotherapy (PCT) for resectable gastric cancer (GC) patients remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the effects of PCRT and PCT in patients with resectable GC and develop a nomogram to evaluate the prognosis and disease risk of patients. METHODS: A total of 6890 patients with stage IB-IIIC GC from 2010 to 2015 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic value of involved variables. A new nomogram was constructed based on development cohort and validated by an external validation cohort. The clinical practicability and accuracy were assessed by concordance index (C-index), calibration plot, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: A better prognosis was obtained for patients with stage III GC treated with PCRT compared with those treated with PCT. Additionally, patients with grade III/IV, diffuse type GC, distal gastric cancer (DGC), tumor size >34 millimeters, or positive lymph nodes were more likely to benefit from PCRT. Multivariate analyses indicated that age, grade, tumor size, T stage, N stage, and comprehensive treatment were independent covariates. Excellent agreement of calibration plots and good discrimination power were obtained using the nomogram. The nomogram achieved a better net benefit than the 8th edition AJCC TNM staging. An online version was built based on the nomogram for convenient clinical use. CONCLUSION: The application of perioperative chemoradiotherapy should be determined according to the clinicopathological features of patients. Our nomogram provided a reliable tool for screening patients who were right for PCRT and evaluating individual survival benefits.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Gastrectomía , Nomogramas , Atención Perioperativa , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Anciano , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Atención Perioperativa/efectos adversos , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Programa de VERF , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postoperative hypoxemia (POH) is common and primarily treated with temporary oxygen supplementation. Because the clinical impact of POH is sometimes presumed as minor, efforts to better understand and minimize it have been limited. Here, we hypothesized that, after adjusting for opioids received perioperatively and other confounders, the frequency of POH events (POH%) reported within the first 3 postoperative days (PODs) is associated with increased postoperative 1-year mortality. METHODS: With prior institutional review board (IRB) approval, the Epic Clarity database was queried for all adult inpatient anesthesia encounters performed at our health system (1 academic and 2 community hospitals) from January 1, 2012 to March 31, 2016. Patients with multiple hospitalizations or subsequent surgeries within the same hospitalization were excluded. We classified patients based on the presence (POH) or not (No-POH) of ≥1 documented peripheral saturation of oxyhemoglobin (SpO2) ≤85% event of any duration occurring between the discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) until POD 3. Demographics, comorbidities, surgery duration, morphine milligram equivalents (OMME) administered perioperatively, respiratory therapies, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and hospital length of stay (LOS) were also collected. Logistic regression was used to characterize the association between POH and 1-year postoperative mortality after adjusting for perioperatively administered opioids and other confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 43,011 patients met study criteria. At least 1 POH event was reported in 10,727 (24.9%) patients. Of these, 7179 (66.9%) had ≥1 hypoxemic event on POD 1, 5340 (49.8%) on POD 2, and 3455 (32.3%) on POD 3. Patients with ≥1 POH event, compared to No-POH patients, were older, had more respiratory and other comorbidities, underwent longer surgeries, received greater opioid doses on the day of surgery and POD 1, and received more continuous pulse oximetry monitoring. POH patients required more frequent postoperative oxygen therapy, noninvasive ventilation (NIV), intubation, and ICU admission. One-year postoperative mortality occurred in 4.4% of patients with ≥1 POH and 3.0% of No-POH patients (P < .001). After adjusting for confounding factors, for every 10% increase in the frequency of SpO2 ≤85% readings, the odds of postoperative 1-year mortality were 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.29; P < .001). Perioperative opioids were not independently associated with increased 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for perioperative opioids and other confounders, moderate/severe POH within the first 3 PODs was independently associated with increased 1-year postoperative mortality. Increased efforts should be directed to understand if efforts to detect and reduce POH lead to improved patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Hipoxia/mortalidad , Atención Perioperativa/efectos adversos , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Bases de Datos Factuales/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoxia/diagnóstico , Hipoxia/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad/tendencias , Atención Perioperativa/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgery for catecholamine-producing tumours can be complicated by intraoperative and postoperative haemodynamic instability. Several perioperative management strategies have emerged but none has been evaluated in randomized trials. To assess this issue, contemporary perioperative management and outcome data from 21 centres were collected. METHODS: Twenty-one centres contributed outcome data from patients who had surgery for phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma between 2000 and 2017. The data included the number of patients with and without α-receptor blockade, surgical and anaesthetic techniques, complications and perioperative mortality. RESULTS: Across all centres, data were reported on 1860 patients with phaeochromocytoma or paraganglioma, of whom 343 underwent surgery without α-receptor blockade. The majority of operations (78·9 per cent) were performed using minimally invasive techniques, including 16·1 per cent adrenal cortex-sparing procedures. The cardiovascular complication rate was 5·0 per cent overall: 5·9 per cent (90 of 1517) in patients with preoperative α-receptor blockade and 0·9 per cent (3 of 343) among patients without α-receptor blockade. The mortality rate was 0·5 per cent overall (9 of 1860): 0·5 per cent (8 of 517) in pretreated and 0·3 per cent (1 of 343) in non-pretreated patients. CONCLUSION: There is substantial variability in the perioperative management of catecholamine-producing tumours, yet the overall complication rate is low. Further studies are needed to better define the optimal management approach, and reappraisal of international perioperative guidelines appears desirable.
ANTECEDENTES: La cirugía de los tumores productores de catecolaminas puede complicarse por la inestabilidad hemodinámica intraoperatoria y postoperatoria. Se han propuesto distintas estrategias de manejo perioperatorio, pero ninguna ha sido evaluada en ensayos aleatorizados. Para evaluar este tema, se han recogido los datos de los resultados y del manejo perioperatorio contemporáneo de 21 centros. MÉTODOS: Veintiún centros aportaron datos de los resultados de los pacientes operados por feocromocitoma y paraganglioma entre 2000-2017. Los datos incluyeron el número de pacientes con y sin bloqueo del receptor α, las técnicas quirúrgicas y anestésicas, las complicaciones y la mortalidad perioperatoria. RESULTADOS: Los centros en su conjunto aportaron datos de 1.860 pacientes con feocromocitoma y paraganglioma, de los cuales 343 pacientes fueron intervenidos sin bloqueo del receptor α. La gran mayoría (79%) de las cirugías se realizaron utilizando técnicas mínimamente invasivas, incluido un 17% de procedimientos con preservación de la corteza suprarrenal. La tasa de complicaciones cardiovasculares fue de 5,0% en total; 5,9% (90/1517) en pacientes con bloqueo preoperatorio de los receptores α y 0,9% (3/343) en pacientes no pretratados. La mortalidad global fue del 0,5% (9/1860); 0,5% (8/1517) en pacientes pretratados y 0,3% (1/343) en pacientes no tratados previamente. CONCLUSIÓN: Existe una variabilidad sustancial en el manejo perioperatorio de los tumores productores de catecolaminas, aunque la tasa global de complicaciones es baja. Este estudio brinda la oportunidad para efectuar comparaciones sistemáticas entre estrategias de prácticas terapéuticas variables. Se necesitan más estudios para definir mejor el enfoque de manejo óptimo y parece conveniente volver a evaluar las guías internacionales perioperatorias.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/cirugía , Paraganglioma/cirugía , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Feocromocitoma/cirugía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adrenalectomía/métodos , Adrenalectomía/mortalidad , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In a variety of animal models, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (Ω3-FAs) conferred strong protective effects, alleviating hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury and steatosis, as well as enhancing regeneration after major tissue loss. Given these benefits along with its safety profile, we hypothesized that perioperative administration of Ω3-FAs in patients undergoing liver surgery may ameliorate the postoperative course. The aim of this study was to investigate the perioperative use of Ω3-FAs to reduce postoperative complications after liver surgery. METHODS: Between July 2013 and July 2018, we carried out a multicentric, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial designed to test whether 2 single intravenous infusions of Omegaven® (Ω3-FAs) vs. placebo may decrease morbidity. The primary endpoints were postoperative complications by severity (Clavien-Dindo classification) integrated within the comprehensive complication index (CCI). RESULTS: A total of 261 patients (132 in the Omegaven and 129 in the placebo groups) from 3 centers were included in the trial. Most cases (87%, n = 227) underwent open liver surgery and 56% (n = 105) were major resections (≥3 segments). In an intention-to-treat analysis including the dropout cases, the mortality rate was 4% and 2% in the Omegaven and placebo groups (odds ratio0.40;95% CI 0.04-2.51; p = 0.447), respectively. Any complications and major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3b) occurred in 46% vs. 43% (p = 0.709) and 12% vs. 10% (p = 0.69) in the Omegaven and placebo groups, respectively. The mean CCI was 17 (±23) vs.14 (±20) (p = 0.417). An analysis excluding the dropouts provided similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The routine perioperative use of 2 single doses of intravenous Ω3-FAs (100 ml Omegaven) cannot be recommended in patients undergoing liver surgery (Grade A recommendation). LAY SUMMARY: Despite strong evidence of omega-3 fatty acids having liver-directed, anti-inflammatory and pro-regenerative action in various rodent models, 2 single omega-3 fatty acid infusions given to patients before and during liver surgery failed to reduce complications. Because single omega-3 fatty acid infusions failed to confer liver protection in this trial, they cannot currently be recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov: ID: NCT01884948; Institution Ethical Board Approval: KEK-ZH-Nr. 2010-0038; Swissmedic Notification: 2012DR3215.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos Omega-3/administración & dosificación , Aceites de Pescado/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Sustancias Protectoras/administración & dosificación , Triglicéridos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
More than 1.53 million adults undergo inpatient surgery in the UK NHS. Patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery have a much greater risk of death than patients admitted for elective surgery. Widespread variations in key standards of care between hospitals exist and are associated with differences in mortality rates.Recently there have been three large-scale initiatives to improve quality of care for emergency laparotomy patients: the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit, the enhanced perioperative care for high-risk patients trial and the Emergency Laparotomy Collaborative. Here we provide a critical review of what we currently know about the use of structured methods for improving the quality of healthcare services, with reference to the three initiatives. We find that using structured methods to improve care is the hallmark of quality improvement but attention must too be paid to the context in which these methods are used.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Laparotomía , Atención Perioperativa , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Humanos , Laparotomía/mortalidad , Laparotomía/normas , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Atención Perioperativa/normas , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (AEG type I) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy. METHODS: Eligible patients from four Austrian centers were selected to conduct a retrospective analysis. All patients treated between January 2007 and October 2017 with chemotherapy according to EOX-protocol (Epirubicin, Oxaliplatin, Xeloda) or chemoradiation according to CROSS-protocol (carboplatin/paclitaxel + RTX 41.4 Gy), before esophagectomy were included. Primary outcomes disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as well as secondary outcomes downstaging of T- or N-stage and achievement of pathological complete response pCR (ypT0N0M0) were analyzed. Data of 119 patients were included. RESULTS: Complete data was available in 104 patients, 53 patients in the chemoradiation group and 51 patients in the chemotherapy group. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was significantly higher in the EOX group (EOX 29 ± 15.5 vs. CROSS 22 ± 8.8; p < 0.05). Median follow-up in the CROSS group was 17 months (CI 95% 8.8-25.2) and in the EOX group 37 months (CI 95% 26.5-47.5). In the chemotherapy group, the OS rate after half a year, - 1, and 3 years was 92%, 75%, and 51%. After chemoradiation, overall survival after half a year was 85 %, after 1 year 66%, and after 3 years 17%. In the EOX group DFS after ½, - 1, and 3 years was 90%, 73%, and 45%, in the chemoradiation group after half a year 81%, after 1 year 55% and after 3 years 15%. Pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 23% of patients after CROSS and in 10% after EOX (p < 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: There seem to be clear advantages for chemoradiation, concerning the major response of the primary tumor, whereas a tendency in favor for chemotherapy is seen in regards to systemic tumor control. Furthermore, the type of neoadjuvant treatment has a significant influence on the number of lymph nodes resected.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Esofagectomía/mortalidad , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Austria , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Perioperative chemotherapy and surgery is the standard of care in advanced gastroesophageal cancer patients, but its impact among those treated with radical surgery still needs further assessment. We present the results of this multimodality treatment approach in a gastric cancer patients cohort treated with D2 lymphadenectomy. We aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with improved survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients treated with perioperative chemotherapy and resection in a single cancer center in Brazil between 2006 and 2016. Subjects presenting tumors of the gastric stump, esophageal tumors, or treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy were excluded. Intention-to-treat survival analysis was performed for all subjects who started neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and prognostic factors were determined among those who had R0 resection. RESULTS: This study included 239 patients, of whom 198 had R0 resection. The mean age was 59.9 years, and most had clinical stage IIB or III disease (88%). Among the 239 patients who started neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 207 (86.6%) completed all neoadjuvant treatment cycles, and surgical resection was performed in 225 subjects (94.1%). Overall 60-day morbidity and mortality rates were 35.6% and 4.4%, respectively. For the entire cohort, median survival was 78 months and the 5-year survival rate was 55.3%. Factors associated with worse survival were ypT3-4 stage, ypN + stage, extended resection, and no adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative chemotherapy resulted in very good outcomes for patients treated with radical surgery, and downstaging after chemotherapy was shown to be a major determinant of prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/mortalidad , Gastrectomía/mortalidad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/mortalidad , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Because of new surgical techniques, advanced monitoring modalities and improvements in perioperative care, perioperative mortality and morbidity have been significantly reduced in the last decades; however, patients still suffer from high perioperative mortality and morbidity, especially those with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases. Not only perioperative myocardial infarction but also myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery, which presents without clinical symptoms, is associated with an adverse outcome. Patients at risk require particular interdisciplinary attention throughout the perioperative phase. The premedication visit is of particular importance. In addition to a thorough patient medical history and physical assessment, the perioperative handling of the patient's pre-existing medication and possible necessity for further preoperative tests should be verified. If necessary and where possible, optimization of the patient's state of health can be planned together with other disciplines. It is the anesthesiologist's responsibility to optimally guide and support patients with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases through the entire surgical procedure. This review summarizes perioperative interventions that have an influence on patient mortality and morbidity and evaluates the underlying evidence. This covers the perioperative handling of cardioprotective medication, choice of the anesthetic regimen, blood pressure management and transfusion regimens. Furthermore, this review highlights recent findings, e.g. perioperative reloading with statins and short-term preoperative initiation of beta blockers. The pros and cons of thoracic epidural anesthesia in patients with an elevated cardiovascular risk are discussed. Not only intraoperative hypotension should be of concern to anesthesiologists but also postoperative hypotension can have a deleterious impact on the outcome. This is relevant in the time period when a significant proportion of patients have already left the monitoring ward. The recently published recommendations by the World Health Organization concerning perioperative hyperoxia might not be beneficial for patients with an elevated cardiovascular risk. Finally, the treatment options for perioperative cardiovascular events are explained and an algorithm for handling of patients with perioperative myocardial injury without clinical ischemic symptoms is suggested (myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery).
Asunto(s)
Anestesiología/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Isquemia Miocárdica/mortalidad , Atención Perioperativa/efectos adversos , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Anestesia Epidural/efectos adversos , Anestésicos/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos/efectos adversos , Arritmias Cardíacas , Presión Sanguínea , Femenino , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Hipotensión , MorbilidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A proposition for the Wellington hospital thrombosis service to manage periprocedure anticoagulation bridging was made after a number of cancellations and key incidents were caused by lack of a consistent management approach. We provided individual bridging assessments, with implementation, communication, and education. The only funded anticoagulants in New Zealand at that time were dabigatran, warfarin, and enoxaparin. METHODS: On initiation of the bridging service, we prospectively collected data on 600 consecutive patients referred to the periprocedure bridging service between May 2015 and February 2017. We recorded the 30-day major bleeding events, thrombotic events, and related mortality. We followed the patients up for 30 days postprocedure. As part of this process, we ensured optimal transition back to their initial anticoagulant. CONCLUSION: We found low rates of major bleeding 1.9% and thrombosis 0.8% at day 30 comparable to randomized controlled trials. Of the 222 patients taking dabigatran experienced no major bleeding events. We believe using a specialist coagulation service is optimal to ensure surgery can proceed safely.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Atención Perioperativa , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Trombosis/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda , Atención Perioperativa/efectos adversos , Atención Perioperativa/mortalidad , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Derivación y Consulta , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidad , Tromboembolia/sangre , Tromboembolia/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia/mortalidad , Trombosis/sangre , Trombosis/diagnóstico , Trombosis/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma represents an understudied, rare, and aggressive histologic subtype of non-small cell lung cancer. Better understanding of rare disease subtypes allows for improved individualization of patient care. This study aimed to evaluate current trends in treatment and survival of pleomorphic carcinoma. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with staged, pleomorphic carcinoma and adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2015. Patient characteristics and treatments were compared using χ2 tests. Cox proportional hazard models examined survival by stage after controlling for confounders. Propensity score matched Kaplan-Meier curves estimated survivor functions stratified by stage. Differences in survival following treatment for stage I pleomorphic carcinoma with surgery alone versus surgery plus chemotherapy were compared with Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred eight patients with pleomorphic carcinoma and 607,561 patients with adenocarcinoma were identified. Pleomorphic carcinoma accounted for 0.1% of all non-small cell lung cancers. Pleomorphic disease had poorer overall 5-year survival compared with adenocarcinoma for stages I through IV (49.4% vs 59.1%, 34.5% vs 43.8%, 16.9% vs 28.4%, and 5.7% vs 7.8%, respectively; P < .0047 for all). Perioperative chemotherapy was used more frequently for pleomorphic disease (17.5% vs 6.1%; P < .001). For stage I pleomorphic cancer, treatment with surgery alone (n = 253) and surgery with chemotherapy (n = 57) had overall 5-year survival rates of 55.2% and 53.7%, respectively, and were not significantly different (P = .2868). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma is rare and aggressive, with worse survival when compared with adenocarcinoma. Perioperative chemotherapy has not demonstrated significant survival benefits in stage I pleomorphic cancer.