A systematic review of randomised controlled trials on topical nasal steroids.

Introduction: Intranasal corticosteroids (INCs) are the first line of therapy for chronic sinonasal conditions such as rhinitis and rhinosinusitis. Among these, one of the most frequently used is beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP). Over the years many studies have evaluated the efficacy of BDP as part of therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and allergic rhinitis (AR) along with nasal washes, which seems to be very well tolerated. Objective: To analyse the data in the literature regarding the various therapeutic regimens of BDP in different sinonasal disease and their efficacy and tolerability. Materials and methods: Using different search engines, the posology, efficacy, and tolerability of BDP were reviewed and a total of 64 full-length articles were examined for eligibility. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 4 articles were reviewed. Results: BDP is among the group of INCs with significant improvement of nasal symptoms and has good efficacy and safety. Conclusions: BDP nasal spray is one of the most frequently prescribed INC for rhinitis and rhinosinusitis. Treatment with BDP resulted in significant and clinically meaningful improvements in nasal symptoms associated with AR and CRS. BDP is well tolerated, and the safety profile is similar to that of placebo in most patients. These results, in conjunction with the significant benefit reported in subjects with CRS and AR, provide convincing evidence of the overall effectiveness of BDP for the treatment of the full spectrum of sinonasal disease.

Assessing Inhaled Corticosteroid Adherence and Responsiveness in Severe Asthma Using Beclometasone Dipropionate/Formoterol NEXThaler Dose-Counting and Nitric Oxide Monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Sixty-five percent of people with severe asthma and a fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) greater than or equal to 45 parts per billion (ppb) are nonadherent to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). Digital devices recording both time of use and inhaler technique identify nonadherence and ICS responsiveness but are not widely available. As the NEXThaler dose counter activates only at an inspiratory flow rate of 35 L/min, this may provide an alternative to identifying ICS responsiveness. OBJECTIVE: To assess ICS adherence and responsiveness in severe asthma using beclometasone/formoterol (200/6 µg) NEXThaler (BFN) dose-counting. METHODS: Patients with severe asthma with a Feno greater than or equal to 45 ppb were invited to use BFN in place of their usual ICS/long-acting ß2-agonist. Feno, 6-item Asthma Control Questionnaire score, lung function, and blood eosinophil count were monitored for 3 months. A log10ΔFeno of greater than or equal to 0.24 was used to define Feno suppression as the primary marker of ICS responsiveness at day 28. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 48 (56%) patients demonstrated significant Feno suppression at month 1 (median pre-114, post-48 ppb, P < .001). A small but significant reduction occurred in Feno nonsuppressors. The 6-item Asthma Control Questionnaire score fell a median 1.2 units in Feno suppressors (P < .001) and 0.5 units in nonsuppressors (P = .025). These effects were sustained until month 3 in Feno suppressors, with a significant improvement in FEV1 and blood eosinophils. Sixty-seven percent (18 of 27) of those with baseline ICS/long-acting ß2-agonist prescription refills of 80% or more were Feno suppressors, suggesting prior nonadherence despite adequate prescription collection. Seventy-nine percent of Feno suppressors did not require biologics within mean 11.4 months from initial dose counting. CONCLUSIONS: BFN dose-counting identifies ICS responsiveness in severe asthma with the implication that these patients may not need to progress to biological therapies.

Which intranasal corticosteroids can be used in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy or pre-exposure prophylactic?

KEY POINTS: All intranasal corticosteroid spray formulations are safe to use in patients on pre-exposure prophylaxis. Beclomethasone nasal spray can be used safely with all HAART and PrEP regimens.

Comparison of extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate dry powder inhaler and pressurized metered-dose inhaler in Chinese patients with asthma: the FORTUNE study.

OBJECTIVE: When selecting inhaled therapies, it is important to consider both the active molecules and the device. Extrafine formulation beclomethasone dipropionate plus formoterol fumarate (BDP/FF) has been available for some years delivered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). More recently, a breath-activated, multi-dose dry-powder inhaler (DPI), the NEXThaler, has been approved. The current study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of BDP/FF delivered via the DPI vs. via the pMDI, in Chinese adults with asthma. METHODS: After a four-week run-in period, when all patients received BDP/FF pMDI 100/6 µg, two inhalations twice daily (BID), patients were randomized equally to BDP/FF pMDI or DPI, both 100/6 µg, two inhalations BID for 12 weeks. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of BDP/FF DPI vs. BDP/FF pMDI in terms of average pre-dose morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the entire treatment period. RESULTS: Of 252 and 242 patients in the DPI and pMDI groups, respectively, 88.5% and 88.8% completed the study. The primary objective was met, with no statistically significant difference between the treatments in average pre-dose morning PEF, and with the lower limit of the 95% CI above the -15 L/min non-inferiority margin (adjusted mean difference: 5.25 L/min [95% CI: -0.56, 11.06]). Adverse events were reported by 48.4% and 49.6% patients in the DPI and pMDI groups, respectively, most mild or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: The NEXThaler DPI is a similarly effective device to the pMDI for the administration of BDP/FF in adults, so extending the options available for the management of asthma.

Inhaled beclomethasone in the treatment of early COVID-19: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, hospital-based trial in Sri Lanka.

OBJECTIVES: To study if early initiation of inhaled beclomethasone 1200 mcg in patients with asymptomatic, mild or moderate COVID-19 reduces disease progression to severe COVID-19. DESIGN: Double-blinded, parallel-groups, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: A hospital-based study in Sri Lanka. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with asymptomatic, mild or moderate COVID-19, presenting within the first 7 days of symptom onset or laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19, admitted to a COVID-19 intermediate treatment centre in Sri Lanka between July and November 2021. INTERVENTIONS: All participants received inhaled beclomethasone 600 mcg or placebo two times per day, for 10 days from onset of symptoms/COVID-19 test becoming positive if asymptomatic or until reaching primary endpoint, whichever is earlier. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Progression of asymptomatic, mild or moderate COVID-19 to severe COVID-19. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of days with a temperature of 38°C or more and the time to self-reported clinical recovery. RESULTS: A total of 385 participants were randomised to receive beclomethasone(n=193) or placebo(n=192) stratified by age (≤60 or >60 years) and sex. One participant from each arm withdrew from the study. All participants were included in final analysis. Primary outcome occurred in 24 participants in the beclomethasone group and 26 participants in the placebo group (RR 0.90 ; p=0.763). The median time for self-reported clinical recovery in all participants was 5 days (95% CI 3 to 7) in the beclomethasone group and 5 days (95% CI 3 to 8) in the placebo group (p=0.5). The median time for self-reported clinical recovery in patients with moderate COVID-19 was 5 days (95% CI 3 to 7) in the beclomethasone group and 6 days (95% CI 4 to 9) in the placebo group (p=0.05). There were no adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Early initiation of inhaled beclomethasone in patients with asymptomatic, mild or moderate COVID-19 did not reduce disease progression to severe COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Sri Lanka Clinical Trials Registry; SLCTR/2021/017.

Can single-inhaler Beclometasone Dipropionate/Formoterol Fumarate/Glycopyrronium therapy postpone or save biologics for severe asthma?

Inhaled corticosteroids, along with beta2-agonists and anti-muscarinics, represent the cornerstone of asthma treatment. Although the advent of monoclonal antibodies has dramatically changed severe asthma management, there are still patients ineligible or with poor response to biologics. Moreover, high costs associated with monoclonal antibodies prescription are still an open issue, leading clinicians to carefully assess cost-benefit ratio before their administration. From this perspective, the use of single-inhaler Beclometasone Dipropionate/Formoterol Fumarate/Glycopyrronium in patients with severe asthma could not only improve their clinical and functional performance, but also postpone biologic prescription, with positive repercussions on healthcare costs.

The rising cost of rhinologic medications.

BACKGROUND: The high prescription drug cost in the United States may negatively affect patient prognosis and treatment compliance. OBJECTIVE: To fill the knowledge gap and inform clinicians regarding rhinology medications price changes by evaluating trends in price changes of highly used nasal sprays and allergy medications. METHODS: The 2014-2020 Medicaid National Average Drug Acquisition Cost database was queried for drug pricing information for the following classes of medications: intranasal corticosteroids, oral antihistamines, antileukotrienes, intranasal antihistamines, and intranasal anticholinergics. Individual medications were identified by Food and Drug Administration-assigned National Drug Codes. Per unit, drug prices were analyzed for average annual prices, average annual percentage price changes, and inflation-adjusted annual and composite percentage price changes. RESULTS: Beclometasone (Beconase AQ, 56.7%, QNASL, 77.5%), flunisolide (Nasalide, -14.6%), budesonide (Rhinocort Aqua, -1.2%), fluticasone (Flonase, -6.8%, Xhance, 11.7%), mometasone (Nasonex, 38.2%), ciclesonide (Omnaris, 73.8%), combination azelastine and fluticasone (Dymista, 27.3%), loratadine (Claritin, -20.5%), montelukast (Singulair, 14.5%), azelastine (Astepro, 21.9%), olopatadine (Patanase, 27.3%), and ipratropium bromide (Atrovent, 56.6%) had an overall change in inflation-adjusted per unit cost between 2014 and 2020 (% change). Of 14 drugs evaluated, 10 had an increase in inflation-adjusted prices, for an average increase of 42.06% ± 22.27%; 4 of 14 drugs had a decrease in inflation-adjusted prices, for an average decrease of 10.78% ± 7.36%. CONCLUSION: The rising cost of highly used medications contributes to increased patient acquisition costs and may pose barriers of drug adherence to particularly vulnerable populations.

Beclometasone inhaler-induced recovery of refractory peri-ileostomy skin complications.

Peristomal skin complications (PSCs) are relatively common in ostomy patients, particularly in those with ileostomies. Non-healing irritation presents a clinical challenge and leads to pain and impaired quality of life for patients. METHODS: The cases of four ileostomy patients experiencing severe, challenging PSCs refractory to appliance changes, conventional dressings and barrier creams are discussed. FINDINGS: The cases of one male and one female patient with an end ileostomy post-subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis, one female with a defunctioning ileostomy post-anterior resection for sigmoid carcinoma and one male with an end ileostomy with a complex Crohn's surgical history are described. Two puffs of a 250 mcg metered dose beclometasone inhaler were applied to the affected skin once or twice daily. Treatment ranged from 6 to 21 days. Complete resolution was seen in all cases. CONCLUSION: Topical use of a beclometasone inhaler was effective for severe peri-ileostomy PSC secondary to four different aetiologies. Further studies are warranted to determine the effectiveness of this treatment in a larger patient cohort.

Assessment of extrafine beclomethasone/formoterol for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A non-interventional study in a Bulgarian population.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of application of a fixed dose beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and formoterol fumarate (F) for the treatment of severe chronic obstructive disease (COPD) has been amply proven in well controlled clinical trials. Whether this also holds for real-world conditions and in such a heterogeneous patient population as is encountered in Bulgaria remained to be investigated. METHODS: In an observational, non-interventional study, 441 Bulgarian patients with severe COPD who were enrolled at 36 sites across the country received extrafine BDP/FF-combination therapy using the NEXThaler® DPI or the Foster® pMDI over a period of 16 weeks. At visits at the beginning, after 4 weeks and at the end of the study, alterations in lung function parameters FEV1 and FVC, disease symptoms, changes in CAT score, and patient distribution in GOLD 2017 categories A through D were assessed. RESULTS: A large share of the Bulgarian patients with severe COPD suffered from serious comorbidities, received additional medication, and about 2/3 were former or current smokers. Extrafine BDP/FF caused an increase in mean FEV1, FVC, a decrease of health impact as assessed by the CAT score, and a considerable shift of the share of category C and D patients towards A and B. In addition, the percentage of patients that were free of symptoms impacting everyday life such as fatigue and shortness of breath at rest increased throughout the study. A comparison of both application devices indicated that the NEXThaler® was superior in terms of lung functional aspects, as these parameters displayed a constant improvement over the observation period, whereas they plateaued at week 4 when using the pMDI. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic benefits of extrafine BDP/FF known from clinical trials could also be observed in a real-world setting, even in such a heterogenous patient population as the Bulgarian. The NEXThaler® appeared to be highly efficient in this setting, opening a new choice for the lung specialist and the patient to select the one device considered most suitable and practical.

Involvement of esterases in the pulmonary metabolism of beclomethasone dipropionate and the potential influence of cannabis use.

Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) is an inhaled glucocorticoid used for maintenance treatment of asthma in adults and children. BDP is a prodrug activated in lung when hydrolyzed to its major active metabolite beclomethasone-17-monopropionate (17-BMP), which can be further deactivated to beclomethasone (BOH). The specific hydrolases contributing to these processes have not been identified which warrants an investigation to enable a better assessment of the drug-drug interaction (DDI) liability and a better management of drug efficacy and systemic toxicity. In the present study, the pulmonary metabolism of BDP was investigated using both human lung S9 (HLuS9) and recombinant carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) S9. By employing the relative activity approach, we tested the hypothesis of CES1 being the major enzyme involved. Assessment of other hydrolases were conducted in an assay with selective esterase inhibitors. In addition, the DDI potentials between BDP and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) were evaluated due to the increasing use of inhaled cannabis both recreationally and medically. The mechanism of DDI was conducted in an in vitro time-dependent inhibition assay, and further interpreted utilizing a proposed model. In HLuS9, BDP was efficiently metabolized almost completely to 17-BMP, which was then converted to BOH at a much lower rate. CES1 was found as a minor contributor accounting for only 1.4% of BDP metabolism in HLuS9, while arylacetamide deacetylase might be the main enzyme involved. Both THC and CBD inhibited the HLuS9 mediated BDP hydrolysis in a reversible manner, with reported IC50 values estimated as 8.98 and 36.8 µM, respectively. Our proposed model suggested a moderately decreased 17-BMP exposure in lung by concomitant THC from a cannabis cigarette, while the effects from orally administered CBD was expected to be of no clinical relevance.

Characterisation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease initiating single-device inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting ß2-agonist dual therapy in a primary care setting in England.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment pathways of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving single-device dual therapies in England remain unclear. This study describes the characteristics of patients with COPD before initiating treatment with a single-device inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ß2-agonist (ICS/LABA) in primary care in England. METHODS: This is a retrospective, descriptive study of linked primary and secondary healthcare data (Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, Hospital Episode Statistics). Patients with COPD were indexed on first prescription of fixed-dose, single-device ICS/LABA (June 2015-December 2018). Demographics, clinical characteristics, prescribed treatments, healthcare resource use (HCRU) and direct healthcare costs were assessed over 12 months pre-index. Incident users (indexed on first ever prescription) could be non-triple users (no concomitant long-acting muscarinic antagonist at index); a subset were initial maintenance therapy (IMT) users (no history of pre-index maintenance therapy). RESULTS: Overall, 13 451 incident users (non-triple users: 7448, 55.4%; IMT users: 5162, 38.4%) were indexed on beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol (6122, 45.5%), budesonide/formoterol (2703, 20.1%) or Other ICS/LABA combinations (4626, 34.4%). Overall, 20.8% of incident users had comorbid asthma and 42.6% had ≥1 moderate-to-severe acute exacerbation of COPD pre-index. Baseline characteristics were similar across indexed therapies. At 3 months pre-index, 45.3% and 35.4% of non-triple and IMT users were receiving maintenance treatment. HCRU and direct healthcare costs were similar across indexed treatments. Prescribing patterns varied regionally. CONCLUSION: Patient characteristics, prior treatments, prior COPD-related HCRU and direct healthcare costs were similar across single-device ICS/LABAs in primary care in England. A high proportion of patients were not receiving any respiratory medication pre-index, indicating that prescribing in primary care in England is more closely aligned with national guidelines than global treatment strategies. Comorbid asthma may have influenced prescribing decisions. Less than half of users had preindex exacerbations, suggesting that ICS/LABA is not being prescribed principally based on exacerbation history.

Oral beclomethasone dipropionate is an effective treatment for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced colitis.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced (CPI) colitis but are associated with complications including life-threatening infection. The topically acting oral corticosteroid beclomethasone dipropionate (BD) is an effective treatment for mild to moderate flares of ulcerative colitis, and has fewer side effects than systemic corticosteroids. We hypothesized that BD would be an effective treatment for CPI-induced colitis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who started BD for CPI-induced colitis at three UK cancer centers between November 2017 and October 2020. All patients underwent endoscopic assessment and biopsy. The initial regimen of BD was 5 mg once daily for 28 days. Data were collected from electronic patient records. Clinical outcomes were assessed at 28 days after initiation of treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (14 male) with a median age of 64 (range 45-84) with CPI-induced colitis were treated with BD. At baseline, the median number of loose stools in a 24-hour period was six (common terminology criteria for adverse events, CTCAE grade diarrhea=2). Thirteen patients (59%) were dependent on systemic corticosteroids prior to starting BD. Baseline sigmoidoscopy showed moderate inflammation (Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES) = 2) in two patients (9%), mild inflammation (MES=1) in nine patients (41%) and normal findings (MES=0) in eleven patients (50%). Twenty patients (91%) had histopathological features of inflammation. All 22 patients (100%) had a clinical response to BD and 21 (95%) achieved clinical remission with a return to baseline stool frequency (CTCAE diarrhea=0). Ten patients (45%) had symptomatic relapse on cessation of BD, half within 7 days of stopping. All patients recaptured response on restarting BD. No adverse events were reported in patients treated with BD. CONCLUSIONS: Topical BD represents an appealing alternative option to systemic immunosuppressive treatments to treat colonic inflammation. In this study, BD was effective and safe at inducing remission in CPI-induced colitis, which was refractory to systemic corticosteroids. Further randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine the optimum dosing regimen.

Can the response to a single dose of beclomethasone dipropionate predict the outcome of long-term treatment in childhood exercise-induced bronchoconstriction?

BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a frequent and highly specific symptom of childhood asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the mainstay of controller therapy for EIB and asthma; however, a proportion of asthmatic children and adolescents is less responsive to ICS. We hypothesized that a single dose response to ICS could function as a predictor for individual long-term efficacy of ICS. OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive value of the bronchoprotective effect of a single-dose beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) against EIB for the bronchoprotective effect of 4 weeks of treatment, using an exercise challenge test (ECT). METHODS: Thirty-two steroid-naïve children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years with EIB were included in this prospective cohort study. They performed an ECT at baseline, after a single-dose BDP (200µg) and after 4 weeks of BDP treatment (100 µg twice daily) to assess EIB severity. RESULTS: The response to a single-dose BDP on exercise-induced fall in FEV1 showed a significant correlation with the response on exercise-induced fall in FEV1 after 4 weeks of BDP treatment (r = .38, p = .004). A reduction in post-exercise fall in FEV1 of more than 8% after a single-dose BDP could predict BDP efficacy against EIB after 4 weeks of treatment with a positive predictive value of 100% (CI: 86.1-100%) and a negative predictive value of 29.4% (CI: 11.7%-53.7%). CONCLUSION: We found that the individual response to a single-dose BDP against EIB has a predictive value for the efficacy of long-term treatment with BDP. This could support clinicians in providing personalized management of EIB in childhood asthma.

Successful treatment of intractable gastrointestinal tract graft-vs-host disease with oral beclomethasone dipropionate in pediatric and young adult patients: Case reports.

RATIONALE: The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a common target organ of graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients, and GI tract GVHD is often resistant to standard treatments such as corticosteroids. Moreover, longterm use of systemic corticosteroids sometimes induces adverse events such as infection. Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) is a potent, topically active corticosteroid, which is metabolized to an active derivative in the intestinal mucosa. Oral BDP therapy is reportedly effective against GI tract GVHD in adult HSCT patients, but its efficacy and safety in pediatric patients remain undefined. Here, we report three pediatric and young adult cases who were treated with oral BDP. PATIENT CONCERNS: Three (6-, 7-, and 18-year-old) patients developed stage 2 to 4 lower GI tract GVHD, which was resistant to standard immunosuppressive therapies. DIAGNOSIS: Lower GI tract GVHD in these patients was histopathologically proven by endoscopic biopsy. INTERVENTIONS: Oral administration of enteric-coated capsules of BDP (3-8 mg/day) was started for the treatment of lower GI tract GVHD. OUTCOMES: With the introduction of oral BDP therapy, their GI tract symptoms promptly resolved (abdominal pain, within 3-7 days; diarrhea, within 2-3 weeks). Subsequently, systemic immunosuppressive agents such as corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil were successfully tapered off. During oral BDP therapy, although cytomegalovirus antigenemia and Acinetobacter Iwoffii sepsis developed in 2 cases, both were curable with conventional treatments. In a young adult case, concomitant BK virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis resolved after oral BDP was introduced and systemic immunosuppressive agents were reduced. Transient growth restriction was observed in a pediatric case who was treated with oral BDP for approximately 300days. LESSONS: Our experiences suggest that oral BDP therapy is an effective approach for GI tract GVHD that is resistant to standard immunosuppressive therapies. Of clinical importance, our case suggests the possibility that oral BDP therapy may improve the immunosuppressive condition in GI tract GVHD patients by contributing to the reduction of systemic immunosuppressive medications as a result of prompt improvement of GI tract GVHD symptoms.

Reliever-Triggered Inhaled Glucocorticoid in Black and Latinx Adults with Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Black and Latinx patients bear a disproportionate burden of asthma. Efforts to reduce the disproportionate morbidity have been mostly unsuccessful, and guideline recommendations have not been based on studies in these populations. METHODS: In this pragmatic, open-label trial, we randomly assigned Black and Latinx adults with moderate-to-severe asthma to use a patient-activated, reliever-triggered inhaled glucocorticoid strategy (beclomethasone dipropionate, 80 µg) plus usual care (intervention) or to continue usual care. Participants had one instructional visit followed by 15 monthly questionnaires. The primary end point was the annualized rate of severe asthma exacerbations. Secondary end points included monthly asthma control as measured with the Asthma Control Test (ACT; range, 5 [poor] to 25 [complete control]), quality of life as measured with the Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI; range, 0 to 1, with lower scores indicating greater impairment), and participant-reported missed days of work, school, or usual activities. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 1201 adults (603 Black and 598 Latinx), 600 were assigned to the intervention group and 601 to the usual-care group. The annualized rate of severe asthma exacerbations was 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.78) in the intervention group and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.92) in the usual-care group (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.999; P = 0.048). ACT scores increased by 3.4 points (95% CI, 3.1 to 3.6) in the intervention group and by 2.5 points (95% CI, 2.3 to 2.8) in the usual-care group (difference, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.2); ASUI scores increased by 0.12 points (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.13) and 0.08 points (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.09), respectively (difference, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.05). The annualized rate of missed days was 13.4 in the intervention group and 16.8 in the usual-care group (rate ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95). Serious adverse events occurred in 12.2% of the participants, with an even distribution between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among Black and Latinx adults with moderate-to-severe asthma, provision of an inhaled glucocorticoid and one-time instruction on its use, added to usual care, led to a lower rate of severe asthma exacerbations. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and others; PREPARE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02995733.).

Impact of body mass index on omalizumab response in adults with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Effectiveness of asthma treatment, including biologics, may be different in patients with higher body mass index (BMI). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate response to omalizumab (dosed by serum immunoglobulin E level and weight) by BMI category. METHODS: Pooled data from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of adults with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma were analyzed by BMI category (<25 kg/m2 [normal or underweight], n = 397; 25 to <30 kg/m2 [overweight], n = 330; ≥ 30 kg/m2 [obese], n = 268). Placebo-adjusted exacerbation rate reductions were evaluated by Poisson regression modeling. Changes from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) dose, Total Asthma Symptom Score, and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire were evaluated by analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Greater placebo-adjusted exacerbation rate reductions (95% confidence interval) were observed with increasing BMI (normal or underweight, -37.4% [-69.0% to 26.8%]; overweight, -52.7% [-78.4% to 3.7%]; obese, -71.9% [-86.9% to -39.5%]). There were no differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 second improvement between BMI categories at week 16 (normal or underweight, 76.2 [5.3-147.1] mL; overweight, 98.1 [13.9-182.4] mL; obese, 69.1 [-18.9 to 157.2] mL). No differences in BDP dose reduction (µg) were noted between BMI categories (normal or underweight, 23.0 [15.7-30.3]; overweight, 22.5 [13.5-31.5]; obese, 16.6 [5.8-27.3]). Fewer patients in the higher BMI categories eliminated BDP use. There were trends for smaller improvements with higher BMI in Total Asthma Symptom Score (normal/underweight, -0.52 [-0.82 to -0.22]; overweight, -0.50 [-0.80 to -0.20]; obese, -0.39 [-0.77 to 0.00]) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (normal or underweight, 0.34 [0.16-0.52]; overweight, 0.34 [0.13-0.55]; obese, 0.15 [-0.08 to 0.39]). CONCLUSION: Omalizumab provides benefit to patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma, regardless of BMI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Studies 008/009 were conducted before clinical trial registration was required, and therefore clinical trial registration numbers are not available.

Systemic corticosteroids could be used as bridge treatment in children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome waiting for surgery.

PURPOSE: Local and systemic inflammatory markers and pro-inflammatory cytokines are increased in children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Therefore, systemic or topical anti-inflammatory agents are used to treat this syndrome. We evaluated the treatment with systemic corticosteroids in children with severe OSAS and adenotonsillar hypertrophy before surgery. METHODS: This was an unblinded open label study. Children with severe OSAS (diagnosed through polysomnography, obstructive apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] > 10 eV/h) were recruited. Exclusion criteria included age < 3 years, history of acute or chronic cardiorespiratory or neuromuscular or metabolic disease; major craniofacial abnormalities; and chromosomal syndromes and epilepsy. Computer-generated random numbers were used for simple randomization of subjects. All children were treated with intranasal beclomethasone spray, and 15 children additionally received oral betamethasone and 0.1 mg/kg per day for 7 days. Sleep clinical record (SCR) and pulsoximetry were performed before and after 7 days in all children. RESULTS: Among 28 children with severe OSAS mean age was 4.5 ± 1.8 years, AHI 20.4 ± 1.8 eV/h). In children treated with intranasal and oral corticosteroids, mean (95.3 ± 1.1 vs 97.0 ± 0.8%, p = 0.0001) and minimum oxygen saturation (78.8 ± 6.3 vs 89.2 ± 4.2, p = 0.001) improved, and the SCR score (12.6 ± 1.2 vs 8.3 ± 1.1, p = 0.0001) was reduced. Children treated only with intranasal beclomethasone spray showed no differences in outcome measures before and after treatments. When we considered the oximetry measures, after corticosteroid treatment, we obtained statistical differences between the 2 groups (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These results seem to suggest that a short course of oral betamethasone could be useful to treat children with severe OSAS and adenotonsillar hypertrophy waiting for surgery.