[Personalized character of toxic effects through mass nonlethal poisoning by phenazepam and other psychoactive substances]. / Personifitsirovannyi kharakter toksicheskikh effektov na primere massovykh nesmertel'nykh otravlenii fenazepamom i drugimi psikhoaktivnymi veshchestvami.

Over several months, 14 people were admitted in 6 hospitals with severe symptoms of intoxication with psychoactive substances as a result of mass poisoning. All symptoms occurred after taking a drink that contained crushed phenazepam tablets. Samples of blood (n=10) and urine (n=6) taken from 14 sufferers for forensic, chemical and toxicological examination were analyzed using the HPLC-MS/MS method. Phenazepam was detected in the biomaterial of all 14 patients. Other psychoactive substances (baclofen, pregabalin, chlorprothixene, chlorpromazine, phenibut, tramadol, diazepam), narcotic substances and ethanol were also found in the sufferers. The phenazepam concentration in the blood was in the range of 109.75-786.50 ng/ml, in the urine - 8.97-101.28 ng/ml. The pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic characteristics of toxicants as well as additional factors characterizing the phenotype of the sufferer in addition to drug's content in the biological material must be taken into account to determine the toxicity level of phenazepam against the background of combined action with other psychoactive substances.

Benzodiazepine analysis by an improved LC-MS/MS method illustrates usage patterns in Washington State.

BACKGROUND: The standard approach for benzodiazepine detection often includes immunoassay followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The illicit use of non-prescribed benzodiazepines has been trending up nationally. METHODS: We developed and validated an improved LC-MS/MS assay for benzodiazepine detection in urine. We expanded the testing panel by adding five drugs to the previous panel of ten. We determined the prevalence of individual benzodiazepines in our patient population. Immunoassay results were compared with LC-MS/MS to evaluate assay performance. RESULTS: Clonazepam and alprazolam were the most common benzodiazepines present. Etizolam and flualprazolam were also prevalent in Washington State. Compared with the LC-MS/MS assay, the immunoassay had variable cross-reactivity, which explained false negative and false positive immunoassay results. The inclusion of new drugs in the LC-MS/MS panel significantly reduced the incidence of immunoassay results interpreted as falsely positive. CONCLUSION: New illicit benzodiazepines have emerged regionally and nationally. The inclusion of novel drugs in LC-MS/MS assay was helpful in properly characterizing the epidemiology of benzodiazepine use in our patient population. This information will lead to better assay result interpretations and patient care, and our experiences provide a roadmap for other clinical laboratories looking to expand their testing menu or transition to new instrumentation.

Biochip array technology for new psychoactive substances detection in biological samples: Evaluation of the specificity of the Randox Evidence Investigator®.

BACKGROUND: The need to detect new psychoactive substances in biological samples is of crucial interest. In this paper, the specificity of a benchtop immunoanalyzer commercialized by Randox was evaluated on real patient samples. METHOD: The Evidence Investigator was assessed to screen for NPS on 80 serum and urine samples coming from patients admitted to the emergency department. Targeted NPS were included in various categories such as synthetic cannabinoids, opioids and benzodiazepines. Results were compared with a chromatographic technique coupled with mass spectrometry. RESULTS: No NPS was detected by the reference technique. Concerning immunoanalysis, some piperazines were positive, caused by the presence of medicine containing this chemical structure. Clonazepam and fentanyl derivatives were confirmed in some cases, but sometimes the positivity was explained by other opiates or benzodiazepines, which also explained two samples falsely positive for etizolam. CONCLUSIONS: The Randox Evidence Investigator was rapid and easy to use. It can be used as a first intention but always followed by a more specific technique in order to detect false positive result.

Facile Fabrication of Diatomite-Supported ZIF-8 Composite for Solid-Phase Extraction of Benzodiazepines in Urine Samples Prior to High-Performance Liquid Chromatography.

A novel diatomite-supported zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 sorbent (ZIF-8@Dt-COOH) was in situ fabricated and developed for solid-phase extraction of three benzodiazepines (triazolam, midazolam and diazepam) in urine followed by high-performance liquid chromatography. ZIF-8@Dt-COOH was easily prepared by coating ZIF-8 on the surface of Dt-COOH and characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectra, X-ray powder diffractometry and scanning electron microscopy. Compared with bare Dt-COOH, the extraction efficiency of ZIF-8@Dt-COOH for the target was significantly increased from 20.1-39.0% to 100%. Main extraction parameters, including ionic strength and pH of solution, loading volume, washing solution, elution solvent and elution volume, were optimized in detail. Under optimum conditions, the developed method gave linearity of three BZDs in 2-500 ng/mL (r ≥ 0.9995). Limits of detection (S/N = 3), and limits of quantification (S/N = 10) were 0.3-0.4 ng/mL and 1.0-1.3 ng/mL, respectively. In addition, the average recoveries at three spiked levels (5, 10 and 20 ng/mL) varied from 80.0% to 98.7%, with the intra-day and inter-day precisions of 1.4-5.2% and 1.5-8.2%, respectively. The proposed method provided an effective purification performance and gave the enrichment factors of 24.0-29.6. The proposed method was successfully employed for the accurate and sensitive determination of benzodiazepines in urine.

Benzodiazepines increase the likelihood of both infectious and thrombotic complications.

INTRODUCTION: Benzodiazepines (BZDs) modulate peripheral γ-amino-butyric acid type A on macrophages causing immunomodulation. They inhibit proinflammatory cytokines increasing infections. Prior studies have also shown that infections can increase thrombotic complications. We sought to examine this relationship in trauma patients. We hypothesized that the presence of BZDs on admission urine drug screen (UDS) would increase rates of both complications. METHODS: All patients submitted to the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study database from 2003 to 2018 were queried. Those with a positive UDS for BZDs were analyzed. Infectious complications were defined as pneumonia, urinary tract infection, sepsis, wound, and soft tissue infection, and thrombotic complications were defined as presence of pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis. Logistic regressions controlling for demographic and injury covariates assessed the adjusted impact of BZDs on infectious and thrombotic complications. RESULTS: A total of 3,393 patients (2.08%) had infectious complications, and 3,048 (1.87%) had thrombotic complications. Furthermore, 33,260 patients (20.4%) had a positive UDS for BZDs on admission. Univariate analysis showed that those positive for BZDs had higher rates of infectious (3.33% vs. 1.76%, p < 0.001) and thrombotic (2.84% vs. 1.62%, p < 0.001) complications. Multivariate analysis revealed that BZDs significantly increased the odds of infectious and thrombotic complications. Patients who tested positive for BZDs and subsequently developed infection had increased odds (adjusted odds ratio, 1.65; p < 0.001) of developing thrombotic complications. CONCLUSION: Trauma patients with a positive UDS for BZDs had higher odds of both infectious and thrombotic complications. Moreover, odds of thrombotic complications were higher in those with infections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, level III.

Are point-of-care urine drug testing devices suitable for antenatal drug screening? A study verifying the Alere® Drug Screen Test Cup for the detection of six classes of drug in a pregnant population.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no national guidelines for antenatal drug testing. At Colchester Hospital, we use a strategy of screen-only using point-of-care testing to detect illicit drug use in pregnancy. To determine the suitability of this approach, we have compared the results of urine analysis by point-of-care testing with another NHS specialist clinical toxicology service that uses confirmation mass spectrometry. METHODS: A total of 482 anonymized random urine specimens from antenatal clinics were tested for six drug classes: amphetamine, benzodiazepines, buprenorphine, cocaine, methadone and opiates using the Alere™ Drug Screen Urine Test Cup. The manufacturer's claims for positive cut-off and result stability were verified using spiked blank urine. Confirmatory testing was performed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) for detection of 26 individual drugs. RESULTS: Of 473 urine samples with adequate volume for point-of-care screening, 4.4% tested positive: 19 opiate and 2 cocaine. Concordance between point-of-care screening and UPLC-MS/MS confirmation was 97.9% for all drugs and 78.9% for opiates. Using spiked urine, only positive results for opiates were stable when read up to the manufacturer's recommended time of 60 min. CONCLUSIONS: The key advantages of using point-of-care devices to detect drug use in pregnancy are that is convenient and cheap. However, the clinical utility of point-of-care testing is limited by its poor sensitivity. Best practice is to confirm results using a more specific and sensitive method. As a result of this study, we are now reviewing our own procedures to consider introducing routine confirmation by mass spectrometry.

Comparison of Two Immunoassay Screening Methods and a LC-MS/MS in Detecting Traditional and Designer Benzodiazepines in Urine.

Sensitive and specific immunoassay screening methods for the detection of benzodiazepines in urine represent an important prerequisite for routine analysis in clinical and forensic toxicology. Moreover, emerging designer benzodiazepines force labs to keep their methodologies updated, in order to evaluate the reliability of the immunochemical techniques. This study aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of two different immunoassay methods for the detection of benzodiazepines in urine, through a comparison with the results obtained by a newly developed liquid chromatographic tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) procedure. A cohort of authentic urine samples (N = 501) were processed, before and after a hydrolysis procedure, through two immunoassays and an LC-MS/MS method. The LC-MS/MS target procedure was optimized for monitoring 25 different molecules, among traditional and designer benzodiazepines, including some metabolites. At least one of the monitored substances was detected in 100 out of the 501 samples. A good specificity was observed for the two immunoassays (>0.99), independently of the cut-offs and the sample hydrolysis. The new kit demonstrated a fairly higher sensitivity, always higher than 0.90; in particular, a high cross-reactivity of the new immunoassay was observed for samples that tested positive for lorazepam and 7-aminoclonazepam. The two immunoassays appeared adequate to monitor not only traditional benzodiazepines but also new designer ones.

Supramolecular solvent (SUPRASs) extraction method for detecting benzodiazepines and zolpidem in human urine and blood using gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

OBJECTIVE: A high-throughput and sensitive method using supramolecular solvent (SUPRASs) for detecting 9 benzodiazepines and zolpidem in human urine and blood by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) was newly established and applied to authentic human urine and blood samples in this study. METHODS: Urine and blood samples were subjected to liquid-liquid extractions with supramolecular solvent mixture which consists of tetrahydrofuran and 1-hexanol. The solvent layer was evaporated to dryness by stream of nitrogen. The residue was reconstituted with methanol, and subjected to analysis by GC-MS/MS in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode; internal standard method was employed for quantifying of each targeted compound. RESULTS: The regression equation has a good linear relationship with correlation coefficients for all tested compounds were not lower than 0.9991. The lower limits of the quantification ranged from 0.20 to 5 ng/mL for tested compounds in urine; Meanwhile, the lower limits of the quantification in this method ranged from 1 to 50 ng/mL for tested compounds in blood. These results showed that excellent reproducibility and satisfactory extraction recovery rates could be obtained for the established analytical method for 10 drugs in both blood and urine samples. CONCLUSION: The established method in this study was high-throughput, simple and sufficiently sensitive for determining of benzodiazepinesand zolpidem in human urine and blood. Therefore, this newly established method could be of use for qualitative and quantitative determination of such drugs in urine and blood samples either for clinical poisoning monitoring or for forensic identification.

Efficacy of DRIVEN-FLOW® M7-II, a new on-site drug screening kit in postmortem urine compared with Triage DOA®.

The efficacy of DRIVEN-FLOW® M7-II(DFM7II) for seven drug groups was compared with Triage DOA® (Triage) using 340 autopsy urine samples taken from bodies within 1 month of death based on mass screening analysis of GC/MS and LC-MS/MS. The sensitivity to benzodiazepines was 0.56 in Triage and 0.53 in DFM7II with few false positives, and their accuracy was 0.88. Triage detected triazolo diazepine derivatives more easily than DFM7II. DFM7II detected diazepam and nitro benzodiazepines more easily than Triage. There were nine amphetamine false-positive cases of more than 10 days after death in Triage, but these were absent in DFM7II during this period. The accuracy of amphetamines for Triage was 0.96 and for DFM7II was 1. Tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) was detected in five cases by mass analysis, while there were four false-positive cases using Triage and eight cases using DFM7II. In the TCA false-positive cases of both kits, tricyclic psychotics such as chlorpromazine, carbamazepine, and quetiapine were included as well as the drug poisoning cases. There were no samples containing cocaine or THC. The accuracy of DFM7II for opiate and barbiturates was 1, but those of Triage was less than 1. Based on the above, DFM7II is a more accurate kit with fewer false-positives for target drug groups, other than TCA, than Triage.

Buprenorphine Medication for Opioid Use Disorder: A Study of Factors Associated With Postpartum Treatment Retention.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The factors associated with medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment retention among pregnant women with opioid use disorder (OUD) are largely unknown. This study sought to characterize factors associated with postpartum treatment retention. METHODS: A retrospective chart review from 2014 to 2017 was conducted among women with OUD in pregnancy treated with buprenorphine. Women were assigned to the treatment retention group if they attended an appointment within 10 to 14 weeks postpartum. Others were assigned to the dropout group. The groups were compared using bivariate analysis for sociodemographic variables, obstetrical and neonatal outcomes, clinical and subjective opioid withdrawal symptoms, buprenorphine dosage, urine drug toxicology (UDT) results, and other factors. RESULTS: A total of 64 pregnancies received treatment until delivery, and 47 (73.1%) were retained in treatment by 12 weeks postpartum. The treatment dropout group had lower buprenorphine doses at delivery, a higher percentage of benzodiazepine positive UDT, and number of UDT positive for benzodiazepine in the third trimester. Breastfeeding rates were higher in the treatment retention group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Future research of variables related to postpartum treatment retention is needed to provide guidelines regarding MOUD during the perinatal period and to optimize maternal and fetal well-being. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This study supports previous recommendations that aggressive treatment of withdrawal symptoms in pregnant women with OUD is needed to maximize treatment retention. This is the first study to find that breastfeeding was associated with postpartum treatment retention; while, increased use of benzodiazepines during pregnancy was associated with postpartum treatment dropout. (Am J Addict 2021;30:43-48).

Using Urine Drug Testing to Estimate the Prevalence of Drug Use : Lessons Learned From the New York City Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013-2014.

OBJECTIVES: Estimating the prevalence of drug use in the general population is important given its potential health consequences but is challenging. Self-reported surveys on drug use have inherent limitations that underestimate drug use. We evaluated the performance of linking urine drug testing with a local, representative health examination survey in estimating the prevalence of drug use in New York City (NYC). METHODS: We used urine drug testing from the NYC Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NYC HANES) to estimate the prevalence of drug use (benzodiazepines, cocaine, heroin, and opioid analgesics) among the study sample and compare the findings with self-reported responses to questions about past-12-month drug use from the same survey. RESULTS: Of 1527 respondents to NYC HANES, urine drug testing was performed on 1297 (84.9%) participants who provided urine and consented to future studies. Self-reported responses gave past-12-month weighted estimates for heroin, cocaine, or any prescription drug misuse of 13.8% (95% CI, 11.6%-16.3%), for prescription drug misuse of 9.9% (95% CI, 8.1%-12.1%), and for heroin or cocaine use of 6.1% (95% CI, 4.7%-7.9%). Urine drug testing gave past-12-month weighted estimates for any drug use of 4.3% (95% CI, 3.0%-6.0%), for use of any prescription drug of 2.8% (95% CI, 1.9%-4.1%), and for heroin or cocaine use of 2.0% (95% CI, 1.2%-3.6%). CONCLUSION: Urine drug testing provided underestimates for the prevalence of drug use at a population level compared with self-report. Researchers should use other methods to estimate the prevalence of drug use on a population level.

Development and Validation of an LC-MS-MS Method for the Detection of 40 Benzodiazepines and Three Z-Drugs in Blood and Urine by Solid-Phase Extraction.

An analytical method for the detection of 40 benzodiazepines, (±)-zopiclone, zaleplon and zolpidem in blood and urine by solid-phase extraction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was developed and validated. Twenty-nine of 43 analytes were quantified in 0.5 mL whole blood for investigating postmortem, drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) and driving under the influence of drugs cases (DUID). The four different dynamic ranges of the seven-point, linear, 1/x weighted calibration curves with lower limits of quantification of 2, 5, 10 and 20 µg/L across the analytes encompassed the majority of our casework encountered in postmortem, DFSA and DUID samples. Reference materials were available for all analytes except α-hydroxyflualprazolam, a hydroxylated metabolite of flualprazolam. The fragmentation of α-hydroxyflualprazolam was predicted from the fragmentation pattern of α-hydroxyalprazolam, and the appropriate transitions were added to the method to enable monitoring for this analyte. Urine samples were hydrolyzed at 55°C for 30 min with a genetically modified ß-glucuronidase enzyme, which resulted in >95% efficiency measured by oxazepam glucuronide. Extensive sample preparation included combining osmotic lysing and protein precipitation with methanol/acetonitrile mixture followed by freezing and centrifugation resulted in exceptionally high signal-to-noise ratios. Bias and between-and within-day imprecision for quality controls (QCs) were all within ±15%, except for clonazolam and etizolam that were within ±20%. All 29 of the 43 analytes tested for QC performance met quantitative reporting criteria within the dynamic ranges of the calibration curves, and 14 analytes, present only in the calibrator solution, were qualitatively reported. Twenty-five analytes met all quantitative reporting criteria including dilution integrity. The ability to analyze quantitative blood and qualitative urine samples in the same batch is one of the most useful elements of this procedure. This sensitive, specific and robust analytical method was routinely employed in the analysis of >300 samples in our laboratory over the last 6 months.

Flubromazolam: Detection in five post-mortem cases.

Flubromazolam is a potent triazole benzodiazepine with moderately long-lasting central nervous system-depressant effects relative to other benzodiazepines such as commonly prescribed diazepam. Flubromazolam has been studied in the living. However, there are no published reports including measured drug concentrations in post-mortem cases. We report five cases in which flubromazolam was detected in a systematic screen using high-resolution mass spectrometry and then quantified in femoral blood. In none of the five cases was the cause of death directly attributed to flubromazolam toxicity, as there was a variety of both sedative and stimulant drugs also present. However, it is important that the drug concentrations that were measured are made available for future post-mortem forensic interpretation.

Toxicokinetics and Analytical Toxicology of Flualprazolam: Metabolic Fate, Isozyme Mapping, Human Plasma Concentration and Main Urinary Excretion Products.

An increasing number of benzodiazepine-type compounds are appearing on the new psychoactive substances market. 8-Chloro-6-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-methyl-4H-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a][1,4]benzodiazepine (well known as flualprazolam) represents a potent 'designer benzodiazepine' that has been associated with sedation, loss of consciousness, memory loss and disinhibition. The aims of the present study were to tentatively identify flualprazolam metabolites using in vitro incubations with pooled human liver S9 fraction or HepaRG cells by means of liquid-chromatography-high resolution tandem mass spectrometry. Isozymes involved in phase I and II biotransformation were identified in vitro. Results were then confirmed using human biosamples of an 18-year old male who was admitted to the emergency department after suspected flualprazolam ingestion. Furthermore, the plasma concentration was determined using the standard addition method. Seven flualprazolam metabolites were tentatively identified. Several cytochrome P450 and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isozymes, amongst them CYP3A4 and UGT1A4, were shown to be involved in flualprazolam biotransformation reactions, and an influence of polymorphisms as well as drug-drug or drug-food interactions cannot be excluded. Alpha-hydroxy flualprazolam glucuronide, 4-hydroxy flualprazolam glucuronide and the parent glucuronide were identified as most abundant signals in urine, far more abundant than the parent compound flualprazolam. These metabolites are thus recommended as urine-screening targets. If conjugate cleavage was performed during sample preparation, the corresponding phase I metabolites should be added as targets. Both hydroxy metabolites can also be recommended for blood screening. The flualprazolam plasma concentration determined in the intoxication case was as low as 8 µg/L underlining the need of analytical methods with sufficient sensitivity for blood-screening purposes.

Benzodiazepine Use Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Neurocognitive Impairment in People Living With HIV.

OBJECTIVE: Despite potential for dependence and adverse neurological effects, long-term benzodiazepine (BZD) use is common among people living with HIV (PLWH). As PLWH are at risk for central nervous system dysfunction, we retrospectively examined the association between BZD use and HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment (NCI). METHODS: Three hundred six PLWH underwent comprehensive neurobehavioral evaluations. Current BZD use (BZD+) was determined through self-report. Using propensity scores, 153 BZD- individuals were matched to 153 BZD+ participants on demographics and medical comorbidities. Multiple regression models examined NCI and demographically adjusted neurocognitive T-scores as a function of BZD status, adjusting for estimated premorbid ability, current affective symptoms, and nadir CD4 count. Secondary analyses explored neurocognitive correlates of positive BZD urine toxicology screens (TOX+) and specific BZD agents. RESULTS: Median duration of BZD use was 24 months. Current BZD use related to higher likelihood of NCI (odds ratio = 2.13, P = 0.003) and poorer global (d = -0.28, P = 0.020), processing speed (d = -0.23, P = 0.047), and motor T-scores (d = -0.32, P = 0.008). Compared with BZD-/TOX-, BZD+/TOX+ exhibited additional decrements in executive function (d = -0.48, P = 0.013), working memory (d = -0.49, P = 0.011), and delayed recall (d = -0.41, P = 0.032). For individual agents, diazepam, lorazepam, and alprazolam were most strongly associated with NCI (odds ratios >2.31). DISCUSSION: BZD use may elevate risk for NCI in PLWH, potentially through diffuse neurocognitive slowing and acute compromise of recall and higher-order capacities. These effects are robust to psychosocial and HIV-specific factors and occur in comparison with a tightly matched BZD- group. Prospective and interventional studies should evaluate causal associations between NCI and BZD use and explore treatment alternatives to BZDs in PLWH.

The Emergence of New Psychoactive Substance (NPS) Benzodiazepines. A Survey of their Prevalence in Opioid Substitution Patients using LC-MS

Benzodiazepines have a wide range of clinical uses being among the most commonly prescribed medicines globally. The EU Early Warning System on new psychoactive substances (NPS) has over recent years detected new illicit benzodiazepines in Europe's drug market1. Additional reference standards were obtained and a multi-residue LCMS method was developed to test for 31 benzodiazepines or metabolites in urine including some new benzodiazepines which have been classified as New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) which comprise a range of substances, including synthetic cannabinoids, opioids, cathinones and benzodiazepines not covered by international drug controls. 200 urine samples from patients attending the HSE National Drug Treatment Centre (NDTC) who are monitored on a regular basis for drug and alcohol use and which tested positive for benzodiazepine class drugs by immunoassay screening were subjected to confirmatory analysis to determine what Benzodiazepine drugs were present and to see if etizolam or other new benzodiazepines are being used in the addiction population currently. Benzodiazepine prescription and use is common in the addiction population. Of significance we found evidence of consumption of an illicit new psychoactive benzodiazepine, Etizolam.

Physician Renewal of Chronically Prescribed Controlled Substances Based on Urine Drug Test Results.

Objective: The effect of specific urine drug testing (UDT) results on physician prescribing habits has not been well described. The primary objective was to report renewal rates of chronically prescribed controlled substances based on types of inconsistent UDT results. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review over a 5-month period comparing prescription renewals rates for patients with consistent versus inconsistent UDTs. Inconsistent UDTs were defined by prescribed drug not detected or the presence of heroin, cocaine, nonprescribed opioids, nonprescribed benzodiazepines, or marijuana. Results: Of the 474 UDTs reviewed, 214 (45.1%) were inconsistent. The most common findings among inconsistent UDTs, including overlapping results, were prescribed drug not detected (26.8%) and the presence of marijuana (20.7%), nonprescribed opioids (9.9%), and nonprescribed benzodiazepines (6.1%). In contrast, cocaine (5.5%) and heroin (0.4%) were less likely to be found on UDTs for this population. The relative risk (RR) of prescription renewal was 0.64 (95% CI 0.57-0.71) for inconsistent UDTs versus consistent UDTs. Within the inconsistent UDTs, the renewal rates when marijuana (79.6%) or nonprescribed opioids or benzodiazepines (63.6%) were present were much higher than when heroin or cocaine were present (0.0%; P < .001). Patients whose prescribed controlled substance was not detected had a 55.8% renewal rate. Conclusions: Prescription renewal rates were high when patient UDTs contained nonprescribed marijuana, opioids, and benzodiazepines, or when the prescribed drug was not detected. Prescription renewal rates were low when illicit drugs, such as heroin and cocaine, were detected.