RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block (UGSCB) is an emerging technique gaining interest amongst emergency physicians that provides regional anaesthesia to the upper limb to tolerate painful procedures. It offers an alternative to the more traditional technique of a Bier block (BB). However, the effectiveness or safety of UGSCB when performed in the emergency department (ED) is unclear. METHODS: SUPERB (SUPraclavicular block for Emergency Reduction versus Bier block) is a prospective open-label non-inferiority randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of UGSCB versus BB for closed reduction of upper limb fractures and/or dislocations. Adult patients presenting with upper limb fracture and/or dislocation requiring closed reduction in ED were randomised to either UGSCB or BB. Once regional anaesthesia is obtained, closed reduction of the injured part was performed and immobilised. The primary outcome is maximal pain experienced during closed reduction measured via a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include post-reduction pain, patient satisfaction, total opioid requirement in ED, ED length of stay, adverse events and regional anaesthesia failure. RESULTS: Primary outcome analysis will be performed using both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The between-group difference in maximum pain intensity will be assessed using linear regression modelling with trial group allocation (UGSCB vs BB) included as a main affect. A pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 20 mm on the VAS scale will be used to establish non-inferiority of UGSCB compared to BB. CONCLUSION: SUPERB is the first randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness and safety of UGSCB in the ED. The trial has the potential to demonstrate that UGSCB is an alternative safe and effective option for the management of upper extremity emergencies in the ED.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Extremidad Superior , Humanos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Extremidad Superior/inervación , Dimensión del Dolor , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Bloqueo Nervioso/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fracturas Óseas , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/métodos , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/efectos adversos , Estudios de Equivalencia como Asunto , Reducción Cerrada/métodos , Reducción Cerrada/efectos adversos , Luxaciones Articulares/terapia , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Satisfacción del PacienteRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The administration of interscalene block (ISB) may lead to several hemodynamic effects, likely due to the diffusion of local anesthetic to nearby structures such as carotid sinus baroreceptors. This study aimed to compare hemodynamic and respiratory changes resulting from right and left-sided ISB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on adults who had ultrasound-guided ISB for upper limb surgery between January 2020 and December 2021. All patients had ISB with bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 2% mixture following premedication. Demographic data, arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) were measured before and after the block at regular intervals. Block characteristics, surgical and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) durations, intraoperative analgesic requirements, and side effects were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients had ISB for upper limb surgery, 54 for the right and 40 for the left-sided surgeries. Patients' data were analyzed in two groups according to the block side. Increased arterial blood pressure was observed in both groups after the block compared to the control values. Systolic arterial pressure from 10 to 30 minutes, diastolic arterial pressure at the 25th minute, and mean arterial pressure at the 15th, 20th, and 25th minutes were significantly higher on the right-sided blocks. Heart rate, SpO2, analgesic requirements, block characteristics, and PACU durations did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided ISB-applied patients demonstrated increased blood pressure compared to control values. This increase, without concurrent changes in heart rate, was more pronounced in right-sided ISB. These findings indicate that careful hemodynamic monitoring is necessary whenever hypertension should be avoided for the patients.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial , Hipertensión , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/efectos adversos , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/métodos , Anestésicos Locales , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Hemodinámica , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Extremidad Superior/cirugía , Artroscopía/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia (IPH), defined as core body temperature below 36°C, is associated with various complications. Shoulder arthroscopy is a risk factor of IPH. This study aimed to compare the incidence of IPH between general anesthesia (GA) and interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) for shoulder arthroscopy. METHOD: Patients scheduled for shoulder arthroscopy were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to GA or ISBPB groups. The body temperature of the patients was measured from baseline to the end of anesthesia and in the post-anesthetic care unit to compare the incidence of IPH. RESULTS: Of the 114 patients initially identified, 80 were included in the study (GAâ =â 40, ISBPBâ =â 40). The incidence of IPH differed significantly between the groups, with GA at 52.5% and ISBPB at 30.0% (Pâ =â .04). Profound IPH (defined asâ <â 35.0°C) occurred in 2 patients with GA. Upon arrival at the post-anesthesia care unit, the GA group exhibited a significantly lower mean body temperature (35.9â ±â 0.6°C) than the ISBPB group (36.1â ±â 0.2°C, Pâ =â .04). CONCLUSION: The incidence of IPH in the GA group was higher than that in the ISBPB group during shoulder arthroscopy, suggesting that ISBPB may be a preferable anesthetic technique for reducing risk of IPH in such procedures.
Asunto(s)
Anestésicos , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial , Hipotermia , Humanos , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/efectos adversos , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/métodos , Hombro/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Hipotermia/epidemiología , Hipotermia/etiología , Hipotermia/prevención & control , Artroscopía/efectos adversos , Artroscopía/métodos , Incidencia , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Anestesia General/métodos , Dolor PostoperatorioRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Optimal pain management after insertion of a central venous catheter in children remains unclear. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a selective supraclavicular nerve block on postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing hickman catheter or chemoport insertion. METHODS: Fifty patients aged 3-18 years scheduled for elective Hickman or chemoport insertion were randomized into two groups of 25 each: one group received an ultrasound-guided selective supraclavicular nerve block with 0.1 mL/kg of 0.5% ropivacaine (SSCNB group), and the other group did not receive a nerve block (control group). The primary outcome was the postoperative Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale score measured between 10 and 30 min after surgery. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at 1, 3, and 24 h after the surgery, block-related complications, length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit, postoperative analgesic consumption, and time to first analgesic use 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: The worst pain score within 30 min in the recovery room was significantly lower in the SSCNB group compared to the control group (6 [5-7] vs. 3 [2-4]; median difference, -3; 95% CI, -4 to -1; p < .001). Pain scores at 1, 3, and 24 h after surgery were also significantly lower in the SSCNB group. The need for both opioid and non-opioid analgesics in the postoperative period was significantly lower in the SSCNB group (36.0% vs. 0%; p = .002 and 44.0% vs. 16.0%; mean difference, -28%; 95% CI, -56 to 0.19; p = .033, respectively), while other secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided SSCNB is an effective method for managing postoperative pain in children undergoing Hickman catheter or chemoport insertion, reducing the need for analgesics within 24 h after surgery.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Humanos , Niño , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/efectos adversos , Analgésicos , Analgésicos OpioidesRESUMEN
Abstract The subscapularis plane block is an effective approach to anesthetize axillary and upper subscapular nerves. There have been no reports regarding brachial plexus paralysis as a potential complication to date. Described here is a case of median nerve palsy following ultrasound-guided subscapularis plane block for awake frozen shoulder manipulation that was performed on a 52-year-old female diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis. The patient could not flex digits two and three, and ipsilateral inner palm numbness occurred shortly after the block commenced, with complete resolution in the next two hours. The local anesthetics spillage towards brachial plexus with possible partial paralysis should always be expected after subscapularis plane block.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/efectos adversos , Bloqueo Nervioso/efectos adversos , Parálisis , Manguito de los Rotadores , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Anestésicos Locales/efectos adversos , Nervio MedianoRESUMEN
Abstract Background and objectives: The frequent onset of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis during interscalene block restricts its use in patients with respiratory insufficiency. Supraclavicular block could be a safe and effective alternative. Our primary objective was to assess the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block and compare it to that of interscalene block. Methods: Adults warranting elective shoulder surgery under regional anesthesia (Toulouse University Hospital) were prospectively enrolled from May 2016 to May 2017 in this observational study. Twenty millilitres of 0.375% Ropivacaine were injected preferentially targeted to the "corner pocket". Diaphragmatic excursion was measured by ultrasonography before and 30 minutes after regional anesthesia. A reduction ≥25% in diaphragmatic excursion during a sniff test defined the hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. Dyspnoea and hypoxaemia were recorded in the recovery room. Predictive factors of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (gender, age, weight, smoking, functional capacity) were explored. Postoperative pain was also analysed. Results: Forty-two and 43 patients from respectively the supraclavicular block and interscalene block groups were analysed. The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis was 59.5% in the supraclavicular block group compared to 95.3% in the interscalene block group (p < 0.0001). Paradoxical movement of the diaphragm was more common in the interscalene block group (RR = 2, 95% CI 1.4-3; p = 0.0001). A similar variation in oxygen saturation was recorded between patients with and without hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (p = 0.08). No predictive factor of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis could be identified. Morphine consumption and the highest numerical rating scale numerical rating scale (NRS) at 24 hours did not differ between groups. Conclusions: Given the frequent incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following supraclavicular block, this technique cannot be recommended for patients with an altered respiratory function.
Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: O aparecimento frequente de paralisia hemidiafragmática durante o bloqueio interescalênico restringe seu uso em pacientes com insuficiência respiratória. O bloqueio supraclavicular pode ser uma opção segura e eficaz. Nosso objetivo primário foi avaliar a incidência de paralisia hemidiafragmática após bloqueio supraclavicular guiado por ultrassom e compará-lo com o bloqueio interescalênico. Métodos: Os adultos agendados para cirurgia eletiva do ombro sob anestesia regional (Hospital Universitário de Toulouse) foram prospectivamente incluídos neste estudo observacional, de maio de 2016 a maio de 2017. Vinte mililitros de ropivacaína a 0,375% foram injetados, preferencialmente objetivando a interseção da primeira costela e da artéria subclávia. A excursão diafragmática foi medida por ultrassonografia antes e 30 minutos após a anestesia regional. Uma redução ≥ 25% na excursão diafragmática durante um sniff test definiu a paralisia hemidiafragmática. Dispneia e hipoxemia foram registradas na sala de recuperação. Fatores preditivos de paralisia hemidiafragmática (sexo, idade, peso, tabagismo, capacidade funcional) foram explorados. A dor pós-operatória também foi avaliada. Resultados: Quarenta e dois e 43 pacientes dos grupos bloqueio supraclavicular e bloqueio interescalênico, respectivamente, foram avaliados. A incidência de paralisia hemidiafragmática foi de 59,5% no grupo bloqueio supraclavicular em comparação com 95,3% no grupo bloqueio interescalênico (p < 0,0001). O movimento paradoxal do diafragma foi mais comum no grupo bloqueio interescalênico (RR = 2, 95% IC 1,4-3; p = 0,0001). Uma variação semelhante na saturação de oxigênio foi registrada entre os pacientes com e sem paralisia hemidiafragmática (p = 0,08). Nenhum fator preditivo de paralisia hemidiafragmática pôde ser identificado. O consumo de morfina e o maior escore na escala numérica (NRS) em 24 horas não diferiram entre os grupos. Conclusão: Devido à frequente incidência de paralisia hemidiafragmática após bloqueio supraclavicular, essa técnica não pode ser recomendada para pacientes com função respiratória alterada.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto Joven , Parálisis Respiratoria/etiología , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/métodos , Ropivacaína/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Parálisis Respiratoria/epidemiología , Incidencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morfina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Introducción: la anestesia regional ha experimentado importantes cambios en los últimos años, debido, principalmente, al uso de la electroestimulación y la ecografía. La parálisis unilateral del diafragma es una complicación secundaria al bloqueo del plexo braquial por vía supraclavicular con una incidencia del 50 al 67 por ciento. La introducción de la ecolocalización no está exenta de esta. Dar a conocer todos los pormenores a su alrededor para que sirvan de guía a generaciones futuras es un deber de cada investigador. Objetivo: incrementar el conocimiento del manejo de pacientes con bloqueos periféricos bajo el uso de la ultrasonografía y la importancia de su seguimiento. Caso clínico: paciente de 60 años con 82 kg de peso, el que se planificó operación electiva para retirar tumor del antebrazo. Antecedentes de cardiopatía isquémica hipertensiva tratada con la colocación de dos stent. Se decidió realizar bloqueo del plexo braquial por vía supraclavicular y se obtuvo un correcto bloqueo, pero se produjo una parálisis del diafragma unilateral con repercusión para el bienestar del paciente. Conclusiones: a pesar de usar la ultrasonografía para los bloqueos periféricos, se debe seguir una vigilancia estricta de cada paciente durante todo el acto quirúrgico(AU)
Introduction: Regional anesthesia has experienced major changes in recent years, particularly due to the use of electrostimulation and ecogram. The unilateral paralysis of the diaphragm is a secondary complication after blocking the supraclavicular brachial plexus, with an incidence of 50 to 67 percent. The introduction of echolocation is not exempt from this. Every scholar should provide all the details related to it, so that they can serve as a guide to the coming generations. Objective: To increase knowledge on the management of patients with peripheral nerve blocks under the use of ultrasound and the importance of following them. Clinical case: 60-year-old patient with 82 kg of weight, which was planned elective surgery to remove tumor from the forearm. The patient had antecedents of hypertensive ischemic heart disease treated with the placement of two stents. It was decided to lock the supraclavicular brachial plexus, obtaining a correct locking, but there was a unilateral paralysis of the diaphragm with implications for the patient's welfare. Conclusions: despite using ultrasound for peripheral nerve blocks, you must follow a strict monitoring of each patient throughout the surgical act(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Parálisis Respiratoria/complicaciones , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Cuidados PosterioresRESUMEN
ABSTRACT In this case report we highlight the uniqueness of aphonia as, to the best of our knowledge, cases of aphonia related to interscalene brachial plexus block (IBPB) are not described in the literature. Although hoarseness is a common complication of IBPB, aphonia is not. Therefore, we think it is important to publicize the first case of aphonia after IBPB, which may have arisen only because of a recurrent laryngeal nerve chronic injury contralateral to the IBPB site.
RESUMO Relativamente a este relato de caso destacamos a sua singularidade, uma vez que não se encontram descritos na literatura, tanto ou quanto os autores puderam investigar, casos de afonia após uma anestesia combinada com bloqueio do plexo braquial via interescalénica (BPBI). Embora a rouquidão seja uma complicação frequente do BPBI, a afonia não o é. Desse modo, pensamos ser importante dar a conhecer o primeiro caso de afonia após o BPBI, que na opinião dos autores surgiu apenas por causa de uma lesão crônica do nervo laríngeo recorrente contralateral ao local do BPBI.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Afonía/etnología , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/efectos adversos , Artroscopía , Anestesia General , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJETIVO: evaluar el período posoperatorio inmediato en pacientes con lesiones traumáticas quirúrgicas del miembro superior que han recibido dos métodos de anestesia-analgesia. MÉTODOS: se estudiaron 240 pacientes, todos ASA I-II-III según la clasificación del estado físico de la Sociedad Americana de Anestesiología. Se dividieron en dos grupos iguales, grupo G: anestesia general endotraqueal más fentanil y analgesia con dipirona 1,2 g IM cada 6 h, y grupo B: anestesia regional por técnicas continuas de bloqueo del plexo braquial con 100 mg de bupivacaína y analgesia regional con igual anestésico local cada 6 h. RESULTADOS: las complicaciones respiratorias se presentaron solamente en el grupo G (p= 0,01), mientras que las cardiovasculares se observaron 5,3 veces más en el grupo G (p= 0,000). Las náuseas y vómitos se manifestaron en más de la mitad de los pacientes (55 %) del grupo G y solo en seis (5 %) del grupo B (p= 0,000). La retención de orina y la oliguria se observó en tres y cuatro pacientes respectivamente, todos masculinos y del grupo G (p= 0,000). La tendencia a la hiperglucemia apareció en el grupo G en 27 pacientes (22,5 %) y solo en cinco (4,2 %) del grupo B (p= 0,000). Las molestias por la manipulación de la vía aérea superior, se presentaron en 79 pacientes (65,8 %) del grupo G; mientras que las molestias por el catéter solo se refirió en 16 pacientes (13,3 %) del grupo B. El grupo G a las 24 h llegó a tener 69 pacientes (57,5 %) en el nivel de analgesia no satisfactoria (p= 0,01). CONCLUSIONES: el método de anestesia-analgesia regional por bloqueo continuo del plexo braquial tuvo menor incidencia de complicaciones en el posoperatorio inmediato y mejor calidad de analgesia.
OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the immediate postoperative period in surgical patients with traumatic injuries of the upper limb who have undertaken two methods of anesthesia-analgesia. METHODS: 240 patients were studied, all ASA I-II-III according to the classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists for physical state. They were divided into two equal groups. Group G had general endotracheal anesthesia and analgesia with fentanyl plus dipyrone 1.2 g IM every 6 h, and group B who had regional anesthesia techniques for continuous brachial plexus block with 100 mg of bupivacaine and regional analgesia with equal local anesthetic every 6 h. RESULTS: respiratory complications occurred only in group G (p= 0.01), cardiovascular complications were observed 5.3 times more in G group (p= 0.000). Nausea and vomiting were expressed in more than half of patients (55 %) in group G and only in six (5 %) from group B (p= 0.000). Urine retention and oliguria were observed in three and four patients respectively, all male from group G (p= 0.000). Hyperglycemia tendency appeared in group G in 27 patients (22.5 %) and in only five (4.2 %) from group B (p= 0.000). Discomfort by manipulating the upper airway occurred in 79 patients (65.8 %) from group G; nuisance due to the catheter was only referred in 16 patients (13.3 %) from group B. 24 hours after surgery, Group G had 69 patients (57.5 %) in unsatisfactory analgesia level (p= 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: the method of regional anesthesia-analgesia by continuous brachial plexus block had lower incidence of complications in the immediate postoperative period and better quality of analgesia.