RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to validate the use of a model-based dose calculation algorithm (MBDCA), Acuros BV, for high dose rate brachytherapy treatment planning for a community-based hospital with a Bravos afterloader. Based on published AAPM recommendations, this work details a practical approach for community-based clinics to complete initial validation of Acuros BV, in order to add a MBDCA to a TG-43 based brachytherapy treatment planning program. METHODS: Source dimensions and materials used in Acuros BV and TG-43 source models were compared to the physical source. TG-186 testing was completed with standardized test cases externally calculated with Monte Carlo compared to locally calculated with Acuros BV. Point doses calculated using TG-43 were compared to those calculated with Acuros BV in water at various dose grid settings. Secondary dose check software was used to evaluate dose distributions resembling clinical patient plans, both in water and on CT datasets representative of patient anatomy. RESULTS: The major source of discrepancy of source models was the length of modeled steel cable. TG-186 testing showed that the largest differences between Monte Carlo and Acuros BV dose distributions were located along the source axis for cases calculated in water, as well as located in regions of high dose gradients and within the applicator for the case calculated with a generic shielded applicator. An audit of point doses calculated with both TG-43 and Acuros BV in water found that dose grid settings significantly affected agreement. Secondary dose check software indicated that Acuros BV functioned satisfactorily, and a 5% threshold was adopted for secondary dose checks on gynecologic plans. CONCLUSION: This validation process indicated that Acuros BV met expected standards and affirmed its suitability for integration into this clinical practice's brachytherapy treatment planning.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Braquiterapia , Método de Montecarlo , Fantasmas de Imagen , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Braquiterapia/métodos , Braquiterapia/instrumentación , Braquiterapia/normas , Humanos , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/normas , Programas Informáticos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to address the lack of published data on the use of brachytherapy in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma by describing current practice as starting point to develop consensus guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international expert panel on the treatment of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma comprising 24 (pediatric) radiation oncologists, brachytherapists and pediatric surgeons met for a Brachytherapy Workshop hosted by the European paediatric Soft tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG). The panel's clinical experience, the results of a previously distributed questionnaire, and a review of the literature were presented. RESULTS: The survey indicated the most common use of brachytherapy to be in combination with tumor resection, followed by brachytherapy as sole local therapy modality. HDR was increasingly deployed in pediatric practice, especially for genitourinary sites. Brachytherapy planning was mostly by 3D imaging based on CT. Recommendations for patient selection, treatment requirements, implant technique, delineation, dose prescription, dose reporting and clinical management were defined. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus guidelines for the use of brachytherapy in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma have been developed through multicenter collaboration establishing the basis for future work. These have been adopted for the open EpSSG overarching study for children and adults with Frontline and Relapsed RhabdoMyoSarcoma (FaR-RMS).
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Rabdomiosarcoma , Rabdomiosarcoma/radioterapia , Humanos , Braquiterapia/métodos , Braquiterapia/normas , Niño , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Dosificación RadioterapéuticaRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to use computer simulation to analyze the impact of the aluminum fixing support on the Reference Air Kerma (RAK), a physical quantity obtained in a calibration system that was experimentally developed in the Laboratory of Radiological Sciences of the University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (LCR-UERJ). Correction factors due to scattered radiation and the geometry of the192Ir sources were also sought to be determined. The computational simulation was validated by comparing some parameters of the experimental results with the computational results. These parameters were: verification of the inverse square law of distance, determination of (RAKR), analysis of the source spectrum with and without encapsulation, and the sensitivity curve of the Sourcecheck 4PI ionization chamber response, as a function of the distance from the source along the axial axis, using the microSelectron-v2 (mSv2) and GammaMedplus (GMp) sources. Kerma was determined by activity in the Reference air, with calculated values of 1.725 × 10-3U. Bq-1and 1.710 × 10-3U. Bq-1for the ionization chamber NE 2571 and TN 30001, respectively. The expanded uncertainty for these values was 0.932% and 0.919%, respectively, for a coverage factor (k = 2). The correction factor due to the influence of the aluminum fixing support for measurements at 1 cm and 10 cm from the source was 0.978 and 0.969, respectively. The geometric correction factor of the sources was ksg= 1.005 with an expanded uncertainty of 0.7% for a coverage factor (k = 2). This value has a difference of approximately 0.2% compared to the experimental values.
Asunto(s)
Simulación por Computador , Radioisótopos de Iridio , Radiometría , Calibración , Radiometría/métodos , Radioisótopos de Iridio/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Aire , Aluminio , Método de Montecarlo , Dosis de Radiación , Braquiterapia/métodos , Braquiterapia/normas , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Dispersión de RadiaciónRESUMEN
Brachytherapy is an integral component of cancer care. Widespread concerns have been expressed though about the need for greater brachytherapy availability across many jurisdictions. Yet, health services research in brachytherapy has lagged behind that in external beam radiotherapy. Optimal brachytherapy utilisation, to help inform expected demand, have not been defined beyond the New South Wales region in Australia, with few studies having reported observed brachytherapy utilisation. There is also a relative lack of robust cost and cost-effectiveness studies, making investment decisions in brachytherapy even more uncertain and challenging to justify, despite its key role in cancer control. As the range of indications for brachytherapy expands, providing organ/function preservation for a wider range of diagnoses, there is an urgent need to redress this balance. By outlining the work undertaken in this area to date, we highlight its importance and explore where further study is required.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Neoplasias , Braquiterapia/economía , Braquiterapia/normas , Braquiterapia/tendencias , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad , Australia , Humanos , Neoplasias/radioterapiaRESUMEN
The 2020 recommendations for good brachytherapy procedures ("Recorad") are updated based on the 2016 article. This new brachytherapy article took into account recent data published in the literature as well as international recommendations. The different brachytherapy steps are successively described from the treatment preparation (brachytherapy technique prescription; procedure and material, dedicated images for planification, dose distribution analysis and validation) to the end of the procedure as well as post-treatment surveillance.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/normas , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Braquiterapia/métodos , Francia , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagen , Oncología por Radiación , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Sociedades MédicasRESUMEN
The purpose of the first two editions of the guidelines for external radiotherapy procedures, published in 2007 and 2016 respectively, was to issue recommendations aimed at optimising, harmonising and standardising practices. The purpose of this third edition, which includes brachytherapy, is identical while also taking into account recent technological improvements (intensity modulation radiation therapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and three-dimension brachytherapy) along with findings from literature. Part one describes the daily use of general principles (quality, security, image-guided radiation therapy); part two describes each treatment step for the main types of cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/radioterapia , Factores de Edad , Braquiterapia/métodos , Braquiterapia/normas , Instituciones Oncológicas/organización & administración , Creación de Capacidad , Francia , Humanos , Enfermería Oncológica/normas , Terapia de Protones , Oncología por Radiación/educación , Radioterapia/métodos , Radioterapia/normas , Radioterapia/tendencias , Radioterapia Conformacional/normasRESUMEN
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): On October 5, 2018, a meeting of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) Brachytherapy Group was held, in collaboration with the Spanish Society of Medical Physics (SEFM), with the aim of preparing a consensus document on postoperative vaginal-cuff brachytherapy (VCBT). MATERIALS/METHODS: A survey including 42 questions was sent to Spanish Radiation Oncology Centres before the meeting. The survey items included: experience in VCBT, technique indications, previous patient preparation, applicator type, implant procedure, computerized tomography (CT) simulation, definition of target volumes and organs at risk (OAR), dose prescription, fractionation, treatment planning, dosimetric parameters and constraints to OAR. Thirty-three centres answered the survey. Statistical analysis of the survey considered that there was consensus when there was ≥ 85% of agreement related to a survey item, otherwise an item with < 85% of agreement would be discussed during the meeting to reach consensus. RESULTS: The results of the survey are reported here. The mean number of patients treated per centre in 2017 was 52 ± 41 (range 7-175), and the mean number of procedures per centre was 175 ± 150 (range 24-701).There was consensus on: the indications, applicator type, the OAR to be considered, the prescription point, standardisation and dosimetric quality parameters. There was no consensus on: patient preparation for the implant, the need for performing CT simulation and the frequency, the length of the vagina to be treated, if CTV should be delimited, the definition of the clinical target volume, fractionation, overall EQD2, active source length, separation between dwelling stepping source positions, if considering the uniformity/maximum values for dwelling stepping sources, the optimization mode, and the limiting doses to the OAR. After presenting the results of the survey, the consensus meeting discussion focused on the issues for which there was no consensus. CONCLUSION: A consensus document on postoperative VCBT of the Spanish Brachytherapy Groups of SEOR-SEFM was elaborated.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/instrumentación , Braquiterapia/normas , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia , Femenino , Humanos , VaginaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Education and training on prostate brachytherapy for radiation oncology and medical physics residents in the United States is inadequate, resulting in fewer competent radiation oncology personnel to perform implants, and is a factor in the subsequent decline of an important, potentially curative cancer treatment modality for patients with cancer. The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) leadership has recognized the need to establish a sustainable medical simulation low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy workshop program that includes physician-physicist teams to rapidly translate knowledge to establish high-quality brachytherapy programs. METHODS: The ABS, in partnership with industry and academia, has held three radiation oncology team-based LDR/HDR workshops composed of physician-physicist teams in Chicago in 2017, in Houston in 2018, and in Denver in 2019. The predefined key metric of success is the number of attendees who returned to their respective institutions and were actively performing brachytherapy within 6 months of the prostate brachytherapy workshop. RESULTS: Of the 111 physician/physicist teams participating in the Chicago, Houston, and Denver prostate brachytherapy workshops, 87 (78%) were actively performing prostate brachytherapy (51 [59%] HDR and 65 [75%] LDR). CONCLUSIONS: The ABS prostate brachytherapy LDR/HDR simulation workshop has provided a successful education and training structure for medical simulation of the critical procedural steps in quality assurance to shorten the learning curve for delivering consistently high-quality brachytherapy implants for patients with prostate cancer. An ABS initiative, intended to bend the negative slope of the brachytherapy curve, is currently underway to train 300 new competent brachytherapy teams over the next 10 years.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/normas , Educación Médica Continua/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Oncología por Radiación/educación , Sociedades Médicas , Braquiterapia/métodos , Braquiterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Clínica , Humanos , Masculino , Médicos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Entrenamiento Simulado , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Oncología por Radiación/normas , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Braquiterapia/normas , Cuello del Útero/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuello del Útero/patología , Cuello del Útero/efectos de la radiación , Cuello del Útero/cirugía , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/normas , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Oncología por Radiación/métodos , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Radioterapia Adyuvante/normas , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/normas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Safe delivery of brachytherapy and establishing a safety culture are critical in high-quality brachytherapy. The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) Quality and Safety Committee surveyed members regarding brachytherapy services offered, safety practices during treatment, quality assurance procedures, and needs to develop safety and training materials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 22-item survey was sent to ABS membership in early 2019 to physicians, physicists, therapists, nurses, and administrators. Participation was voluntary. Responses were summarized with descriptive statistics and relative frequency distributions. RESULTS: There were 103 unique responses. Approximately one in three was attending physicians and one in three attending physicists. Most were in practice >10 years. A total of 94% and 50% performed gynecologic and prostate brachytherapy, respectively. Ninety-one percent performed two-identification patient verification before treatment. Eighty-six percent performed a time-out. Ninety-five percent had an incident reporting or learning system, but only 71% regularly reviewed incidents. Half reviewed safety practices within the last year. Twenty percent reported they were somewhat or not satisfied with department safety culture, but 92% of respondents were interested in improving safety culture. Most reported time, communication, and staffing as barriers to improving safety. Most respondents desired safety-oriented webinars, self-assessment modules, learning modules, or checklists endorsed by the ABS to improve safety practice. CONCLUSIONS: Most but not all practices use standards and quality assurance procedures in line with society recommendations. There is a need to heighten safety culture at many departments and to shift resources (e.g., time or staffing) to improve safety practice. There is a desire for society guidance to improve brachytherapy safety practices. This is the first survey to assess safety practice patterns among a national sample of radiation oncologists with expertise in brachytherapy.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/radioterapia , Seguridad del Paciente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Oncología por Radiación/organización & administración , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Braquiterapia/normas , Lista de Verificación , Comunicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cultura Organizacional , Sistemas de Identificación de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Gestión de Riesgos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
India has a longstanding tradition in the practice of brachytherapy and has actively contributed to the scientific literature by conducting prospective studies, clinical audits, developing innovative techniques, and performing randomized studies. Indian investigators have also contributed to international collaborative research, education, training programs along with guideline development for brachytherapy in cervix and head and neck cancers. The present article summarizes the key contributions to scientific literature, current infrastructure, skill set for brachytherapy, existing challenges, and strategy to further strengthen brachytherapy practice in the next decade.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Braquiterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Oncología por Radiación/educación , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/instrumentación , Braquiterapia/métodos , Braquiterapia/normas , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Humanos , IndiaRESUMEN
Developing any new radiation oncology program requires planning and analysis of the current state of the facility and its capacity to take on another program. Staff must consider a large number of factors to establish a feasible, safe, and sustainable program. We present a simple and generic outline that lays out the process for developing and implementing a new HDR brachytherapy program in any setting, but with particular emphasis on challenges associated with starting the program in a limited resource setting. The sections include feasibility of a program, starting cases, machine and equipment selection, and quality and safety.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Desarrollo de Programa/métodos , Oncología por Radiación/organización & administración , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Braquiterapia/instrumentación , Braquiterapia/métodos , Braquiterapia/normas , Humanos , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Oncología por Radiación/educación , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Administración de la SeguridadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Brachytherapy (BT) is an essential component of definitive therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Despite the advantages of the dose distribution with BT in cervical cancer, there is paucity of specific skills required for good-quality BT applications. Furthermore, replacing BT with other modern external beam techniques as a boost can lead to suboptimal results in cervix cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Review of available IAEA resources, research and cooperation programs available from the IAEA was completed. These opportunities can be used to address challenges in Brachytherapy. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) provides support for BT through various means that includes education and training, both long term, short term and continuing medical education of professionals, providing expert visits to support implementation, development of curricula for professionals, e-learning through the human health campus, contouring workshops, 2D to 3D BT training, and virtual tumor boards. In addition, the IAEA provides support for implementing quality assurance in radiotherapy to its member states and provides guidelines for comprehensive audits in radiation therapy (QUATRO), and produces safety standards and training in radiation safety. In addition, mapping BT resources, making the case for investment and support for setting up BT services and radiotherapy centers are also available. The IAEA Dosimetry Laboratory provides calibration services to Secondary Standards Dosimetry Laboratories for well chambers used to confirm the reference air kerma rate of Co60 and Ir192 high-dose-rate BT sources, as well as for Cs137 low-dose-rate sources. Furthermore, the IAEA supports research and development in radiotherapy (and BT) through coordinated research activities that include controlled randomized clinical trials, Patterns of Care studies among others. Partnerships with professional organizations and funding bodies, as well as through the United Nations Joint Global Programme on Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control support radiotherapy activities, including BT in countries worldwide. CONCLUSION: The IAEA supports brachytherapy implementation, training and research and provides resources to professionals in the area.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Braquiterapia , Agencias Internacionales , Oncología por Radiación/educación , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/normas , Calibración , Femenino , Humanos , Energía Nuclear , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Oncología por Radiación/normas , Dosificación RadioterapéuticaRESUMEN
Brachytherapy exposure during residency varies between residency training programs. As a result, many graduating radiation oncology residents do not feel competent or confident in performing brachytherapy procedures. A brachytherapy fellowship encompasses hands-on procedural skills in addition to clinical decision-making, radiotherapy treatment planning, as well as post-treatment care. During this time, a fellow develops interpersonal relationships with their faculty supervisors in the form of mentorship, sponsorship, and coaching in addition to clinical teaching. The objective of this article is to review these important relationships focusing on brachytherapy fellowship training as an example.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Becas , Tutoría , Oncología por Radiación/educación , Braquiterapia/normas , Competencia Clínica , HumanosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to establish a quantitative method for implant quality evaluation in permanent seed implant brachytherapy for credentialing. Delivery-based credentialing will promote consistency in brachytherapy seed delivery and improve patient outcomes. METHODS: A workflow for delivery-based credentialing was outlined and applied to permanent breast seed implant brachytherapy. Delivery simulations were performed on implantable anthropomorphic breast phantoms. Two institutions experienced in permanent seed implant brachytherapy demonstrated the peer credentialing process. Each delivery was evaluated for seed placement accuracy as the measure of implant quality, both for implant accuracy and across five simulations to assess implant variation. Initial credentialing criteria are set based on two factors; the mean seed placement accuracy (implant accuracy) and the mean standard deviation (seed variation) with the threshold for each set with the addition of two standard deviations. RESULTS: Across two institutions, seed placement accuracy (±standard deviation) was calculated for all five delivery simulations to yield 6.1 (±2.6) mm. To set credentialing criteria, the implant accuracy (6.1 mm) plus two standard deviations (2.0 mm) and the seed variation (2.6 mm) plus two standard deviations (0.8) mm yield a threshold of 8.1 ± 3.4 mm. It is expected that 95% of experienced institutions would perform the phantom simulation within this threshold. CONCLUSION: Brachytherapy programs should validate delivery accuracy by formal credentialing, which is standard in external beam programs. This quantitative implant evaluation should be combined with current credentialing standards for permanent seed brachytherapy to form a comprehensive validation of institutional brachytherapy program quality.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/normas , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Habilitación Profesional/normas , Braquiterapia/instrumentación , Mama , Femenino , Humanos , Fantasmas de Imagen , Entrenamiento SimuladoAsunto(s)
Braquiterapia/normas , Instituciones Oncológicas/organización & administración , Servicio de Oncología en Hospital/organización & administración , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Escocia/epidemiología , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
The LNE-LNHB has developed a methodology to standardize electronic brachytherapy sources in terms of absorbed dose to water. It is based on the measurement of the air-kerma rate at a given distance from the source and the Monte Carlo calculation of a conversion factor. This factor converts the air-kerma in measurement conditions into absorbed dose to water at a 1 cm reference depth in a water phantom. As a first application, the method was used to calibrate a Zeiss INTRABEAM system equipped with its 4 cm diameter spherical applicator. The absorbed-dose rate value obtained in the current study was found significantly higher than that provided by the manufacturer in line with the observations already reported by a few other teams.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/métodos , Agua , Braquiterapia/normas , Calibración , Humanos , Método de Montecarlo , Fantasmas de Imagen , Radiometría , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Estándares de ReferenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Keratinocyte carcinoma (KC, previously nonmelanoma skin cancer) represents the most common cancer worldwide. While surgical treatment is commonly utilized, various radiation therapy techniques are available including external beam and brachytherapy. As such, the American Brachytherapy Society has created an updated consensus statement regarding the use of brachytherapy in the treatment of KCs. METHODS: Physicians and physicists with expertise in skin cancer and brachytherapy created a consensus statement for appropriate patient selection, data, dosimetry, and utilization of skin brachytherapy and techniques based on a literature search and clinical experience. RESULTS: Guidelines for patient selection, evaluation, and dose/fractionation schedules to optimize outcomes for patients with KC undergoing brachytherapy are presented. Studies of electronic brachytherapy are emerging, although limited long-term data or comparative data are available. Radionuclide-based brachytherapy represents an appropriate option for patients with small KCs with multiple techniques available. CONCLUSIONS: Skin brachytherapy represents a standard of care option for appropriately selected patients with KC. Radionuclide-based brachytherapy represents a well-established technique; however, the current recommendation is that electronic brachytherapy be used for KC on prospective clinical trial or registry because of a paucity of mature data.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/normas , Carcinoma Basocelular/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Cutáneas/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/métodos , Consenso , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Humanos , Selección de Paciente , Radioisótopos/uso terapéutico , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: While the noninvasive breast brachytherapy (NIBB) treatment procedure, known as AccuBoost, for breast cancer patients is well established, the treatment quality can be improved by the efficiency of the workflow delivery. A formalized approach evaluated the current workflow through failure modes and effects analysis and generated insight for developing new procedural workflow techniques to improve the clinical treatment process. METHODS AND MATERIALS: AccuBoost treatments were observed for several months while gathering details on the multidisciplinary workflow. A list of possible failure modes for each procedure step was generated and organized by timing within the treatment process. A team of medical professionals highlighted procedural steps that unnecessarily increased treatment time, as well as introduced quality deficiencies involving applicator setup, treatment planning, and quality control checks preceding brachytherapy delivery. Procedural improvements and their impact on the clinical workflow are discussed. RESULTS: The revised clinical workflow included the following key procedural enhancements. Prepatient arrival: Improvement of prearrival preparation requires advance completion of dose calculation documentation with patient-specific setup data. Patient arrival pretreatment: Physicists carry out dwell time calculations and check the plan, while the therapist concurrently performs several checks of the ensuing hardware configuration. TREATMENT: An electronic method to export the associated HDR brachytherapy paperwork to the electronic medical record system with electronic signatures and captured approvals was generated. Posttreatment: The therapist confirms the applicators were appropriately positioned, and treatment was delivered as expected. CONCLUSIONS: The procedural improvements reduced the overall treatment time, improved consistency across users, and eased performance of this special procedure for all participants.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/métodos , Braquiterapia/normas , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Flujo de Trabajo , Femenino , Humanos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a novel quality assurance (QA) program to check the entire treatment chain of image-guided brachytherapy with dose distribution evaluation in a single setup and irradiation using a gel dosimeter. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A polymer gel was used, and the readout was performed by magnetic resonance scanning. A CT-based treatment plan was generated using the Oncentra planning system (Elekta, Sweden), and irradiation was performed three times using an afterloading device with an Ir-192 source. The dose-response curve of the gel was created using 6-MV X-ray, which is independent of the source beams. Planar gamma images on a coronal plane along the source transport axis were calculated using the measured dose as a reference, and the calculated doses were used in several error simulations (no error; 2.0 or 2.5 mm systematic and random source dwell mispositioning; and dose error of 2%, 5%, 10%, and 20%). RESULTS: The dose-R2 (spin-spin relaxation rate) conversion table revealed that the uncertainty and dose resolution of 6-MV X-ray were better than those of Ir-192 and also constant between the three measurements. With the 3%/1 mm criteria, there were statistically significant differences between each pair of settings except dose error of 2% and 5%. CONCLUSION: This work depicts a simple and efficient end-to-end test that can provide a clinically useful tool for QA of image-guided brachytherapy. In this QA program, air kerma strength and dwell position setting could also be verified. This test can also distinguish between different types of error.