Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 853
Filtrar
1.
Int J Pharm ; 658: 124207, 2024 Jun 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718971

RESUMEN

The application of three-dimensional printing (3DP) in the pharmaceutical industry brings a broad spectrum of benefits to patients by addressing individual needs and improve treatment success. This study investigates the sustained release properties of 3DP tablets containing Theophylline (TPH), which is commonly used to treat respiratory diseases and recently having a comeback due to its potential in the treatment of conditions like Covid-19. Since TPH is a narrow therapeutic window (NTW) drug with serious side effects in the event of overdose, the release properties must be observed particularly closely. We employed a state-of-the-art single screw extrusion 3D printer, which is fed with granules containing the drug. By employing a Taguchi orthogonal array design of experiments (DOE), tablet design parameters and factor related process stability were sought to be evaluated fundamentally. Following this, examinations regarding tailored TPH dosages were undertaken and a relationship between the real printed dose of selected tablet designs and their sustained drug release was established. The release profiles were analyzed using different mathematical model fits and compared in terms of mean dissolution times (MDT). Finally, in-vivo/in-vitro correlation (IVIVC) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling showed that a paradigm patient group could be covered with the dosage forms produced.


Asunto(s)
Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Liberación de Fármacos , Impresión Tridimensional , Comprimidos , Teofilina , Teofilina/química , Teofilina/administración & dosificación , Teofilina/farmacocinética , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/química , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/farmacocinética , Humanos , Composición de Medicamentos/métodos , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Broncodilatadores/química
2.
AAPS J ; 26(3): 56, 2024 04 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38671158

RESUMEN

Advair Diskus is an essential treatment for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It is a dry powder inhaler with a combination of fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol xinafoate (SX). However, the pharmacokinetics (PK) batch-to-batch variability of the reference-listed drug (RLD) hindered its generic product development. This work developed the PK models for inhaled FP and SX that could represent potential batch variability. Two batches each of the reference and the test product (R1, R2, T1, T2) of Advair Diskus (100 µg FP/50 µg SX inhalation) were administered to 60 healthy subjects in a 4-period, 4-sequence crossover study. The failure of the bioequivalence (BE) between R1 and R2 confirmed the high between-batch variability of the RLD. Non-linear mixed effect modeling was used to estimate the population mean PK parameters for each batch. For FP, a 2-compartment model with a sequential dual zero-order absorption best described the PK profile. For SX, a 2-compartment model with a first-order absorption model best fit the data. Both models were able to capture the plasma concentration, the maximum concentration, and the total exposure (AUCinf) adequately for each batch, which could be used to simulate the BE study in the future. In vitro properties were also measured for each batch, and the batch with a higher fraction of the fine particle (diameter < 1 µm, < 2 µm) had a higher AUCinf. This positive correlation for both FP and SX could potentially assist the batch selection for the PK BE study.


Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores , Estudios Cruzados , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco , Combinación Fluticasona-Salmeterol , Modelos Biológicos , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Humanos , Administración por Inhalación , Masculino , Adulto , Combinación Fluticasona-Salmeterol/farmacocinética , Combinación Fluticasona-Salmeterol/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/sangre , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fluticasona/farmacocinética , Fluticasona/administración & dosificación , Xinafoato de Salmeterol/farmacocinética , Xinafoato de Salmeterol/administración & dosificación , Voluntarios Sanos
3.
J Pharm Pharmacol ; 75(9): 1225-1236, 2023 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37364866

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Theophylline is a bronchodilator with a narrow therapeutic index and primarily metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2. Xin-yi-san (XYS) is a herbal formula frequently used to ameliorate nasal inflammation. This study aimed to investigate the effects of XYS and its ingredient, imperatorin, on theophylline pharmacokinetics in rats. METHODS: The kinetics of XYS- and imperatorin-mediated inhibition of theophylline oxidation were determined. Pharmacokinetics of theophylline were analysed. Comparisons were made with the CYP1A2 inhibitor, fluvoxamine. KEY FINDINGS: XYS extract and its ingredient, imperatorin, non-competitively inhibited theophylline oxidation. Fluvoxamine (50 and 100 mg/kg) and XYS (0.5 and 0.9 g/kg) significantly prolonged the time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (tmax) of theophylline by 3-10 fold. In a dose-dependent manner, XYS and imperatorin (0.1-10 mg/kg) treatments significantly decreased theophylline clearance by 27-33% and 19-56%, respectively. XYS (0.9 g/kg) and imperatorin (10 mg/kg) significantly prolonged theophylline elimination half-life by 29% and 142%, respectively. Compared with the increase (51-112%) in the area under curve (AUC) of theophylline by fluvoxamine, the increase (27-57%) by XYS was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: XYS decreased theophylline clearance primarily through imperatorin-suppressed theophylline oxidation. Further human studies are essential for the dose adjustment in the co-medication regimen.


Asunto(s)
Interacciones de Hierba-Droga , Teofilina , Ratas , Humanos , Animales , Teofilina/farmacocinética , Fluvoxamina/farmacología , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética
5.
Pulm Med ; 2021: 8881895, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33815843

RESUMEN

Both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are inflammatory chronic respiratory conditions with high rates of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The objectives of this review are to briefly describe the pathophysiology and epidemiology of asthma and COPD, discuss guideline recommendations for uncontrolled disease, and review a new generic option for the treatment of asthma and COPD. Although mild forms of these diseases may be controlled with as-needed pharmacotherapy, uncontrolled or persistent asthma and moderate or severe COPD uncontrolled by bronchodilators with elevated eosinophilia or frequent exacerbations may require intervention with combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta agonists (LABAs), according to international guidelines. Fixed-dose combinations of ICS/LABA are commonly prescribed for both conditions, with fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol forming a cornerstone of many treatment plans. An oral inhalation powder containing the combination of FP and salmeterol has been available as Advair Diskus® in the United States for almost 20 years, and the first and only substitutable generic version of this product has recently been approved for use: Wixela™ Inhub™. Bioequivalence of Wixela Inhub and Advair Diskus has been established. Furthermore, the Inhub inhaler was shown to be robust and easy to use, suggesting that Wixela Inhub may provide an alternative option to Advair Diskus for patients with asthma or COPD requiring intervention with an ICS/LABA.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Broncodilatadores , Combinación Fluticasona-Salmeterol , Glucocorticoides , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Administración por Inhalación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/fisiopatología , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Medicamentos Genéricos/farmacocinética , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapéutico , Combinación Fluticasona-Salmeterol/farmacocinética , Combinación Fluticasona-Salmeterol/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/farmacocinética , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Polvos/farmacocinética , Polvos/uso terapéutico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Nivel de Atención , Equivalencia Terapéutica
6.
AAPS J ; 23(3): 55, 2021 04 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33856568

RESUMEN

Dry powder inhaler (DPI) is recognized as the first choice for lung diseases' treatment. However, it lacks a universal way for DPI formulation development. Fine lactose is commonly added in DPIs to improve delivery performance; however, the fine ratio-dependent mechanism is unclear. Therefore, the objective of this study is to explore the influence of fine lactose ratio on DPI powder properties and aerodynamic behavior, and the fine lactose ratio-dependent mechanism involved during powder fluidization and lung deposition. Here salbutamol sulfate was used as a model drug, Lactohale® 206 as coarse carrier, and Lactohale® 300 as fine component; the mixtures were prepared at 1% drug content, with fine content up to 20%. It was shown that with the fine addition, flowability of the mixtures was improved, interaction among particles was increased, and the presence of fines could help to improve DPI's aerosolization performance. When the fines added were less than 3%, the "active site" hypothesis played a leading role. When the added fines were over 3% but less than 10%, fluidization enhancement mechanism was more important. After the added fines reaching 10%, aggregate mechanism started to dominate. However, FPF cannot be further increased once the fines reached 20%. Moreover, the correlations between FPF and dynamic powder parameters were verified in ternary mixtures, and cohesion had a greater impact on FPF than that of flowability. In conclusion, adding lactose fines is an effective way to improve lung deposition of DPI, with the concrete mechanism lactose fine ratio dependent.


Asunto(s)
Albuterol/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Portadores de Fármacos/química , Lactosa/química , Modelos Químicos , Administración por Inhalación , Albuterol/química , Albuterol/farmacocinética , Broncodilatadores/química , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Química Farmacéutica , Composición de Medicamentos/métodos , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco , Tamaño de la Partícula , Polvos , Reología
7.
AAPS J ; 23(3): 48, 2021 03 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33768368

RESUMEN

In the context of streamlining generic approval, this study assessed whether pharmacokinetics (PK) could elucidate the pulmonary fate of orally inhaled drug products (OIDPs). Three fluticasone propionate (FP) dry powder inhaler (DPI) formulations (A-4.5, B-3.8, and C-3.7), differing only in type and composition of lactose fines, exhibited median mass aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of 4.5 µm (A-4.5), 3.8 µm (B-3.8), and 3.7 µm (C-3.7) and varied in dissolution rates (A-4.5 slower than B-3.8 and C-3.7). In vitro total lung dose (TLDin vitro) was determined as the average dose passing through three anatomical mouth-throat (MT) models and yielded dose normalization factors (DNF) for each DPI formulation X (DNFx = TLDin vitro,x/TLDin vitro,A-4.5). The DNF was 1.00 for A-4.5, 1.32 for B-3.8, and 1.21 for C-3.7. Systemic PK after inhalation of 500 µg FP was assessed in a randomized, double-blind, four-way crossover study in 24 healthy volunteers. Peak concentrations (Cmax) of A-4.5 relative to those of B-3.8 or C-3.7 lacked bioequivalence without or with dose normalization. The area under the curve (AUC0-Inf) was bio-IN-equivalent before dose normalization and bioequivalent after dose normalization. Thus, PK could detect differences in pulmonary available dose (AUC0-Inf) and residence time (dose-normalized Cmax). The differences in dose-normalized Cmax could not be explained by differences in in vitro dissolution. This might suggest that Cmax differences may indicate differences in regional lung deposition. Overall this study supports the use of PK studies to provide relevant information on the pulmonary performance characteristics (i.e., available dose, residence time, and regional lung deposition).


Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Medicamentos Genéricos/farmacocinética , Fluticasona/farmacocinética , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Adulto , Aerosoles , Área Bajo la Curva , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Liberación de Fármacos , Medicamentos Genéricos/administración & dosificación , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco , Femenino , Fluticasona/administración & dosificación , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polvos , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Adulto Joven
8.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 22(3): 105, 2021 Mar 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33718988

RESUMEN

Medicine regulators require the melting points for crystalline drugs, as they are a test for chemical and physical quality. Many drugs, especially salt-forms, suffer concomitant degradation during melting; thus, it would be useful to know if the endotherm associated with melt degradation may be used for characterising the crystallinity of a powder blend. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether melt-degradation transitions can detect amorphous content in a blend of crystalline and amorphous salbutamol sulphate. Salbutamol sulphate was rendered amorphous by freeze and spray-drying and blended with crystalline drug, forming standards with a range of amorphous content. Crystalline salbutamol sulphate was observed to have a melt-degradation onset of 198.2±0.2°C, while anhydrous amorphous salbutamol sulphate prepared by either method showed similar glass transition temperatures of 119.4±0.7°C combined. Without the energy barrier provided by the ordered crystal lattice, the degradation endotherm for amorphous salbutamol sulphate occurred 50°C below the melting point, with an onset of 143.6±0.2°C. The enthalpies for this degradation transition showed no significant difference between freeze- and spray-dried samples (p>0.05). Distinct from convention, partial integration of the crystalline melt-degradation endotherm was applied to the region 193-221°C which had no contribution from the degradation of amorphous salbutamol sulphate. The linear correlation of these partial areas with amorphous content, R2=0.994, yielded limits of detection and quantification of 0.13% and 0.44% respectively, independent of drying technique. Melt-degradation transitions may be re-purposed for the measurement of amorphous content in powder blends, and they have potential for evaluating disorder more generally.


Asunto(s)
Albuterol/síntesis química , Albuterol/farmacocinética , Química Farmacéutica/métodos , Broncodilatadores/síntesis química , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Rastreo Diferencial de Calorimetría/métodos , Cristalización/métodos , Composición de Medicamentos/métodos , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Polvos , Temperatura de Transición
9.
Chest ; 159(3): 975-984, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33011204

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients admitted to the hospital with COPD are commonly managed with inhaled short-acting bronchodilators, sometimes in lieu of the long-acting bronchodilators they take as outpatients. If held on admission, these long-acting inhalers should be re-initiated upon discharge; however, health-care transitions sometimes result in unintentional discontinuation. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the risk of unintentional discontinuation of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long-acting beta-agonist and inhaled corticosteroid (LABA-ICS) combination medications following hospital discharge in older adults with COPD? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by using health administrative data from 2004 to 2016 from Ontario, Canada. Adults with COPD aged ≥ 66 years who had filled prescriptions for a LAMA or LABA-ICS continuously for ≥ 1 year were included. Log-binomial regression models were used to determine risk of medication discontinuation following hospitalization in each medication cohort. RESULTS: Of the 27,613 hospitalization discharges included in this study, medications were discontinued 1,466 times. Among 78,953 patients with COPD continuously taking a LAMA or LABA-ICS, those hospitalized had a higher risk of having medications being discontinued than those who remained in the community (adjusted risk ratios of 1.50 [95% CI, 1.34-1.67; P < .001] and 1.62 [95% CI, 1.39, 1.90; P < .001] for LAMA and LABA-ICS, respectively). Crude rates of discontinuation for people taking LAMAs were 5.2% in the hospitalization group and 3.3% in the community group; for people taking LABA-ICS, these rates were 5.5% in the hospitalization group and 3.1% in the community group. INTERPRETATION: In an observational study of highly compliant patients with COPD, hospitalization was associated with an increased risk of long-acting inhaler discontinuation. These Results suggest a likely larger discontinuation problem among less adherent patients and should be confirmed and quantified in a prospective cohort of patients with COPD and average compliance. Quality improvement efforts should focus on safe transitions and patient medication reconciliation following discharge.


Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Administración del Tratamiento Farmacológico/normas , Alta del Paciente/normas , Transferencia de Pacientes , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Administración por Inhalación , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/farmacocinética , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administración & dosificación , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/farmacocinética , Anciano , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Canadá/epidemiología , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/administración & dosificación , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/farmacocinética , Deprescripciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/farmacocinética , Transferencia de Pacientes/métodos , Transferencia de Pacientes/normas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Mejoramiento de la Calidad
10.
Respir Res ; 21(Suppl 1): 102, 2020 Sep 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32907566

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Navafenterol (AZD8871) is a dual-pharmacology muscarinic antagonist ß2-agonist (MABA) molecule in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of single doses of navafenterol were investigated in patients with moderate to severe COPD. METHODS: This was a randomized, five-way complete cross-over study. Patients received single doses of navafenterol 400 µg, navafenterol 1800 µg and placebo (all double-blind) and indacaterol 150 µg and tiotropium 18 µg (both open-label active comparators). The primary pharmacodynamic endpoint was change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) on day 2. Safety and tolerability were monitored throughout. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were randomized and 28 (73.7%) completed the study. Navafenterol 400 µg and 1800 µg demonstrated statistically significant improvements vs placebo in change from baseline in trough FEV1 (least squares mean [95% confidence interval]: 0.111 [0.059, 0.163] L and 0.210 [0.156, 0.264] L, respectively, both P < .0001). The changes were significantly greater with navafenterol 1800 µg vs the active comparators (least squares mean treatment difference: 0.065-0.069 L, both P < .05). The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for placebo and the active comparators (range 34.4-37.5%), slightly higher for navafenterol 400 µg (52.9%), and lowest for navafenterol 1800 µg (22.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Both doses of navafenterol demonstrated sustained bronchodilation over 24 h. Navafenterol was well tolerated and no safety concerns were raised. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov ; No.: NCT02573155 ; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov . Registered 9th October, 2015.


Asunto(s)
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administración & dosificación , Broncoconstricción/efectos de los fármacos , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Triazoles/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/farmacocinética , Anciano , Broncodilatadores/efectos adversos , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Inglaterra , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/efectos adversos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/farmacocinética , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/farmacocinética , Recuperación de la Función , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triazoles/efectos adversos , Triazoles/farmacocinética , Capacidad Vital
11.
Respir Res ; 21(Suppl 1): 212, 2020 Sep 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32907575

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Navafenterol (AZD8871) is a novel, long-acting, dual-pharmacology (muscarinic receptor antagonist and ß2-adrenoceptor agonist) molecule in development for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. METHODS: These two phase I, randomised, single-blind, multiple-ascending-dose studies evaluated inhaled navafenterol and placebo (3:1 ratio) in healthy, male, non-Japanese (study A; NCT02814656) and Japanese (study B; NCT03159442) volunteers. In each study, volunteers were dosed in three cohorts, allowing gradual dose escalation from 300 µg to 600 µg to 900 µg. The primary objective was to investigate the safety and tolerability of navafenterol at steady state. Pharmacokinetics were also assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-four volunteers completed each study (navafenterol, n = 6; placebo, n = 2 in each cohort). There were no deaths, serious adverse events (AEs) or treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) leading to discontinuation of navafenterol. The most frequent TEAEs were vessel puncture-site bruise (placebo, n = 2; navafenterol 900 µg; n = 3) in study A and diarrhoea (placebo, n = 1; navafenterol 300 µg, n = 2; navafenterol 900 µg, n = 3) in study B. No dose-response relationship was observed for TEAEs. There was a dose-dependent increase in mean heart rate on day 16 in both studies. The pharmacokinetics of navafenterol were similar between non-Japanese and Japanese volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple ascending doses of navafenterol were well-tolerated and the safety and pharmacokinetics of navafenterol were similar in non-Japanese and Japanese volunteers. The findings support navafenterol clinical development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ; Nos.: NCT02814656 and NCT03159442; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov .


Asunto(s)
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Triazoles/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/farmacocinética , Adulto , Pueblo Asiatico , Broncodilatadores/efectos adversos , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Japón/etnología , Londres , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/efectos adversos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/farmacocinética , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/farmacocinética , Método Simple Ciego , Triazoles/efectos adversos , Triazoles/farmacocinética
12.
Respir Res ; 21(Suppl 1): 211, 2020 Sep 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32907576

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Navafenterol (AZD8871) is an inhaled long-acting dual-pharmacology muscarinic antagonist/ß2-adrenoceptor agonist (MABA) in development for the treatment of obstructive airways diseases. The safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of navafenterol were investigated in patients with mild asthma. METHODS: This was a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending-dose study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two cohorts which evaluated escalating doses of navafenterol (50-2100 µg) in an alternating manner over three treatment periods. The primary pharmacodynamic endpoint was the change from pre-dose baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) for each treatment period. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were randomised; 15 completed treatment. Data from all 16 patients were analysed. The maximum tolerated dose was not identified, and all doses of navafenterol were well tolerated. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were headache (n = 10, 62.5%) and nasopharyngitis (n = 7, 43.8%). No TEAEs were serious, fatal, or led to discontinuation, and no dose dependency was identified. Navafenterol demonstrated a dose-ordered bronchodilatory response with a rapid onset of action (within 5 min post-dose). Doses ≥200 µg resulted in improvements in trough FEV1 (mean change from baseline range 0.186-0.463 L) with sustained bronchodilation for 24-36 h. Plasma concentrations increased in a dose-proportional manner, peaking ~ 1 h post-dose, with a derived terminal elimination half-life of 15.96-23.10 h. CONCLUSIONS: In this study navafenterol was generally well tolerated with a rapid onset of action which was sustained over 36 h. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02573155.


Asunto(s)
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administración & dosificación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncoconstricción/efectos de los fármacos , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Triazoles/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/farmacocinética , Adulto , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/fisiopatología , Broncodilatadores/efectos adversos , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Inglaterra , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/efectos adversos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/farmacocinética , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/farmacocinética , Recuperación de la Función , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triazoles/efectos adversos , Triazoles/farmacocinética
13.
Pharm Res ; 37(10): 209, 2020 Sep 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32995953

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A combined in vitro - in silico methodology was designed to estimate pharmacokinetics of budesonide delivered via dry powder inhaler. METHODS: Particle size distributions from three budesonide DPIs, measured with a Next Generation Impactor and Alberta Idealized Throat, were input into a lung deposition model to predict regional deposition. Subsequent systemic exposure was estimated using a pharmacokinetic model that incorporated Nernst-Brunner dissolution in the conducting airways to predict the net influence of dissolution, mucociliary clearance, and absorption. RESULTS: DPIs demonstrated significant in vitro differences in deposition, resulting in large differences in simulated regional deposition in the central conducting airways and the alveolar region. Similar but low deposition in the small conducting airways was observed with each DPI. Pharmacokinetic predictions showed good agreement with in vivo data from the literature. Peak systemic concentration was tied primarily to the alveolar dose, while the area under the curve was more dependent on the total lung dose. Tracheobronchial deposition was poorly correlated with pharmacokinetic data. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of realistic in vitro experiments, lung deposition modeling, and pharmacokinetic modeling was shown to provide reasonable estimation of in vivo systemic exposure from DPIs. Such combined approaches are useful in the development of orally inhaled drug products.


Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Budesonida/administración & dosificación , Budesonida/farmacocinética , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco/instrumentación , Administración por Inhalación , Broncodilatadores/sangre , Budesonida/sangre , Simulación por Computador , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Pulmón/fisiología , Modelos Biológicos , Tamaño de la Partícula , Faringe , Equivalencia Terapéutica
14.
Drug Metab Dispos ; 48(12): 1312-1320, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32978223

RESUMEN

Revefenacin inhalation solution is an anticholinergic indicated for the maintenance treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Mass balance, pharmacokinetics, and metabolism of revefenacin were evaluated after intravenous and oral administration of [14C]-revefenacin in healthy subjects. Pharmacological activity of the major revefenacin metabolite was also assessed. Adult males (n = 9) received 20 µg intravenously of approximately 1 µCi [14C]-revefenacin and/or a single 200-µg oral solution of approximately 10 µCi [14C]-revefenacin. Mean recovery of radioactive material was 81.4% after intravenous administration (54.4% in feces; 27.1% in urine) and 92.7% after oral dosing (88.0% in feces, 4.7% in urine). Mean absolute bioavailability of oral revefenacin was low (2.8%). Intact revefenacin accounted for approximately 52.1% and 13.1% of the total radioactivity in plasma after intravenous and oral administration, respectively. Two main circulating metabolites were observed in plasma. After an intravenous dose, a hydrolysis product, THRX-195518 (M2) was observed that circulated in plasma at 14.3% of total radioactivity. After an oral dose, both THRX-195518 and THRX-697795 (M10, N-dealkylation and reduction of the parent compound) were observed at 12.5% of total circulating radioactivity. THRX-195518 was the major metabolite excreted in feces and comprised 18.8% and 9.4% of the administered intravenous and oral dose, respectively. The major metabolic pathway for revefenacin was hydrolysis to THRX-195518. In vitro pharmacological evaluation of THRX-195518 indicated that it had a 10-fold lower binding affinity for the M3 receptor relative to revefenacin. Receptor occupancy analysis suggested that THRX-195518 has minimal contribution to systemic pharmacology relative to revefenacin after inhaled administration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The major metabolic pathway for revefenacin was hydrolysis to the metabolite THRX-195518 (M2), and both revefenacin and THRX-195518 underwent hepatic-biliary and fecal elimination after oral or intravenous administration with negligible renal excretion. Pharmacological evaluation of THRX-195518 indicated that it had a 10-fold lower binding affinity for the M3 muscarinic receptor relative to revefenacin and that THRX-195518 has minimal contribution to systemic pharmacology after inhaled administration.


Asunto(s)
Benzamidas/farmacocinética , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Carbamatos/farmacocinética , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/farmacocinética , Administración por Inhalación , Administración Oral , Adulto , Benzamidas/administración & dosificación , Benzamidas/análisis , Disponibilidad Biológica , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Carbamatos/administración & dosificación , Carbamatos/análisis , Heces/química , Voluntarios Sanos , Eliminación Hepatobiliar , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Soluciones , Adulto Joven
16.
Pharm Res ; 37(9): 177, 2020 Aug 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32862295

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Available dry powder inhalers (DPIs) have very poor lung delivery efficiencies in children. The objective of this study was to advance and experimentally test a positive-pressure air-jet DPI for children based on the use of a vertical aerosolization chamber and new patient interfaces that contain a three-dimensional (3D) rod array structure. METHODS: Aerosolization performance of different air-jet DPI designs was first evaluated based on a 10 mg powder fill mass of a spray-dried excipient enhanced growth (EEG) formulation. Devices were actuated with positive pressure using flow rate (10-20 L/min) and inhaled volume (750 ml) conditions consistent with a 5-year-old child. Devices with best performance were connected to different mouthpiece designs to determine the effect on aerosolization and tested for aerosol penetration through a realistic pediatric in vitro mouth-throat model. RESULTS: Use of the new vertical aerosolization chamber resulted in high quality aerosol formation. Inclusion of a 3D rod array structure in the mouthpiece further reduced aerosol size by approximately 20% compared to conditions without a rod array, and effectively dissipated the turbulent jet leaving the device. Best case device and mouthpiece combinations produced < 2% mouth-throat depositional loss and > 70% lung delivery efficiency based on loaded dose. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, use of a 3D rod array in the MP of a positive-pressure air-jet DPI was found to reduce aerosol size by 20%, not significantly increase MP depositional loss, reduce mouth-throat deposition by 6.4-fold and enable lung delivery efficiency as high as 73.4% of loaded dose based on pediatric test conditions.


Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco/instrumentación , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Administración por Inhalación , Aerosoles , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Niño , Preescolar , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Hidrodinámica , Boca , Tamaño de la Partícula , Polvos , Distribución Tisular
17.
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv ; 33(5): 282-287, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32423275

RESUMEN

Background: Primatene® MIST CFC, an epinephrine metered-dose inhaler (MDI), was discontinued from the market owing to environmental concerns from its use of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellant. As a result, a new epinephrine MDI was developed using hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellant. This article reports the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of the newly Food and Drug Administration-approved epinephrine HFA MDI. Methods: A randomized, evaluator-blinded, active-controlled, single-dose, two-arm crossover study was conducted to evaluate the PK profile of epinephrine HFA (Primatene® MIST) and epinephrine CFC (Primatene® MIST CFC) in 23 healthy volunteers to characterize the epinephrine absorption extent and rate. The study was performed at a high dose of five times the normal dose to obtain measurable plasma epinephrine levels. Plasma epinephrine levels were measured and safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, and physical examinations. Results: Epinephrine HFA demonstrated a greater systemic drug exposure (greater area under the curve) than that of epinephrine CFC (∼37% higher). The Cmax occurred at ∼2 minutes and was significantly higher in the epinephrine HFA group (0.18 ng/mL) compared with the CFC version (0.046 ng/mL) at normal dose. Within 20 minutes, both groups demonstrated comparable plasma epinephrine levels. No clinically significant adverse effects were found to be associated with epinephrine HFA, even after an ultrahigh dose (i.e., 10 inhalations). Conclusions: The systemic exposure of epinephrine HFA was found to be higher for the first 20 minutes, and then comparable with epinephrine CFC. Minimal AEs were found in this study despite the very high 1250-2200 µg inhaled doses (i.e., 10 inhalations) used for PK characterization.


Asunto(s)
Propelentes de Aerosoles/química , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Hidrocarburos Fluorados/química , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Adulto , Área Bajo la Curva , Broncodilatadores/efectos adversos , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Clorofluorocarburos/química , Estudios Cruzados , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Epinefrina/efectos adversos , Epinefrina/farmacocinética , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Método Simple Ciego , Adulto Joven
18.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 8(2): e00587, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32302068

RESUMEN

Epinephrine is the standard of care for the treatment of severe allergy and anaphylaxis. Epinephrine is most often administered through the intramuscular (IM) route via autoinjector. The current study aimed to evaluate an alternative method of epinephrine treatment through intranasal (IN) delivery in dogs. The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ), time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax ), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 90 minutes (AUC0-90 ) were observed after IN epinephrine (2, 3, 4, 5, 10, and 20 mg) and IM epinephrine via autoinjector (0.15 and 0.3 mg) for 90 minutes. Heart rate effects were measured after IN (2 and 5 mg) and IM (0.15 and 0.3 mg) epinephrine administration. IN epinephrine (5 mg) demonstrated significantly greater plasma epinephrine concentration at 1 minute as compared with IM epinephrine (0.3 mg) (1.68 ± 0.65 ng/mL vs 0.21 ± 0.08 ng/mL, P = .03). There were no significant differences in Cmax , Tmax , and AUC0-90 between 2-mg IN and 0.15-mg IM epinephrine or between 5-mg IN and 0.3-mg IM epinephrine. IN epinephrine reduced heart rate increases, as compared to IM epinephrine. IN and IM epinephrine were both well-tolerated. Overall, IN epinephrine demonstrated advantages over IM epinephrine, including the rapid increase in plasma epinephrine and lack of increased heart rate over time.


Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Intranasal , Animales , Broncodilatadores/efectos adversos , Broncodilatadores/sangre , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Perros , Epinefrina/efectos adversos , Epinefrina/sangre , Epinefrina/farmacocinética , Femenino , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Masculino
19.
Clin Ther ; 42(4): 634-648, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32253054

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The triple combination therapy budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate in a metered dose inhaler (BGF MDI), formulated by using innovative co-suspension delivery technology, is a new inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting ß2-agonist fixed-dose combination for the maintenance treatment of COPD. For some patients, the use of an MDI may be optimized with a spacer. This Phase I study assessed the effect of a spacer on lung exposure, total systemic exposure, and safety of BGF MDI 320/36/9.6 µg in healthy subjects. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, crossover study assessed the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of BGF MDI in healthy adult subjects who received a single dose of BGF MDI 320/36/9.6 µg (administered as 2 inhalations with 160/18/4.8 µg per actuation) in 4 regimens: without spacer and no charcoal; with spacer and no charcoal; without spacer and with charcoal; and with spacer and with charcoal. Primary objectives were to assess total systemic exposure (without charcoal) and lung exposure (with charcoal) of budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol administered as BGF MDI with and without a spacer. Safety was also assessed. FINDINGS: In total, 56 subjects were randomized (mean age, 29.9 years; 60.7% male, 17.9% former smokers). For systemic exposure (without charcoal), the spacer/without spacer ratio, expressed as a percentage (intrasubject %CV) of Cmax and AUC0-tlast, respectively, was 152.0 (47.5) and 132.8 (43.6) for budesonide, 240.6 (80.2) and 154.7 (73.4) for glycopyrronium, and 165.6 (50.7) and 98.6 (53.8) for formoterol. For lung exposure (with charcoal), the spacer/without spacer ratio percentage (%CV) of Cmax and AUC0-tlast, respectively, was 183.6 (65.9) and 198.4 (71.5) for budesonide, 262.0 (91.8) and 373.9 (120.7) for glycopyrronium, and 222.9 (56.3) and 385.2 (147.0) for formoterol. Subjects who were judged to have suboptimal inhalation technique without a spacer (those in the lowest drug exposure quartile based on AUC0-tlast) had the greatest increase in both total systemic and lung exposure when a spacer was used versus no spacer. Subjects in the highest quartile had a minimal change in both total systemic and lung exposure when the spacer was used. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (all mild/moderate) reported by >1 subject per regimen were headache, cough, and dizziness. One subject withdrew because of TEAEs of headache and presyncope (neither considered treatment-related). IMPLICATIONS: Drug delivery can be improved for subjects with suboptimal MDI inhalation technique when using a spacer device with BGF MDI triple therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03311373.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/farmacocinética , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Budesonida/farmacocinética , Fumarato de Formoterol/farmacocinética , Glicopirrolato/farmacocinética , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/farmacocinética , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Disponibilidad Biológica , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Budesonida/administración & dosificación , Estudios Cruzados , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Fumarato de Formoterol/administración & dosificación , Glicopirrolato/administración & dosificación , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven
20.
Eur J Pharm Sci ; 147: 105304, 2020 Apr 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32165316

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coordination between actuation of a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and inhalation is a critical manoeuvre that many patients fail to perform correctly. pMDIs connected to spacers do not require hand-lung coordination. This study evaluated the relative lung and systemic bioavailability and oropharyngeal deposition of salbutamol post-inhalation from Ventolin® Evohaler® (GlaxoSmithKline) either alone following verbal inhaler technique counselling (VC) or connected to a newly improved Able Spacer® (AS). METHODS: In a two-period, randomized crossover study, 16 healthy adults inhaled 2 × 100 µg salbutamol puffs (1 min gap) from Ventolin using VC or AS. Immediately after each puff inhalation, each subject gargled with 20 mL water for oropharyngeal deposition (OD) determination. Urine samples were collected 0.5 h (pre-) and 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 h post-inhalation. Urine was then pooled 2-24 h post-inhalation. The relative lung bioavailability (0-0.5 h urinary salbutamol excretion - USAL0.5) and systemic bioavailability (0-24 h urinary excretion of salbutamol and its metabolite - USALMET24) were determined. A one week washout separated VC and AS use. RESULTS: The mean (SD) USAL0.5 of VC and AS was 5.36 (4.48) and 12.80 (10.83) µg, respectively. The mean (SD) OD was 11.35 (3.37) and 0.48 (0.30) µg, respectively. VC and AS were significantly different in USAL0.5 and OD (p<0.001). USALMET24 was comparable (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with VC, AS doubled the inhaled salbutamol lung dose and minimised its precipitation in the oral cavity. The results suggest this inhalation aid can add therapeutic and safety benefits particularly in patients with continued pMDI technique issues despite repeated VC.


Asunto(s)
Albuterol/administración & dosificación , Albuterol/farmacocinética , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/instrumentación , Administración por Inhalación , Adulto , Aerosoles , Albuterol/orina , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Disponibilidad Biológica , Broncodilatadores/orina , Estudios Cruzados , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Inhalación , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Distribución Aleatoria , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA