Switch from methadone to buprenorphine with microinduction in outpatient setting. / Poliklinisk skifte fra metadon til buprenorfin med mikroinduksjon.

Background: Switching from methadone to buprenorphine in patients receiving opioid maintenance therapy often requires inpatient care with a gradual tapering of methadone and an opioid-free day with challenging withdrawal symptoms. This case report describes and discusses a gentle outpatient approach without the opioid-free day. Case presentation: A patient with a 15-year history of opioid maintenance therapy reduced his methadone dose from 80 mg to 50 mg due to concurrent use of other sedative substances and a significant risk of overdose. A week-long switch to buprenorphine 16 mg subcutaneous depot formulation was then undertaken using a microinduction approach in the outpatient setting. Interpretation: In line with earlier reports on microinduction, the switch from methadone to buprenorphine was carried out with no opioid withdrawal symptoms or complications. Microinduction offers a smooth and more patient-friendly approach to switching from full opioid agonists to partial agonists. Randomised controlled trials are, however, needed for a systematic evaluation of this method.

Perceptions of extended-release buprenorphine among people who received medication for opioid use disorder in jail: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Incarceration provides an opportunity for health interventions, including opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment and prevention of opioid-related overdoses post-release. All FDA-approved forms of medication for OUD (MOUD) treatment were mandated in several Massachusetts jails in 2019, with some jails offering extended-release buprenorphine (XR-Bup). Little is known about patient perspectives on and experiences with XR-Bup in carceral settings. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews in 2022 with community-dwelling people who received MOUD during a recent incarceration in a Massachusetts jail. We asked participants about their experiences with and perspectives on XR-Bup while in jail. Qualitative data were double-coded deductively and reviewed inductively to identify emergent themes, which were structured using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). RESULTS: Participants (n = 38) had a mean age of 41.5 years, were 86% male, 84% White, 24% Hispanic, and 95% continued to receive MOUD at the time of their interview, including 11% receiving XR-Bup. Participants who viewed XR-Bup favorably appreciated avoiding the taste of sublingual buprenorphine; avoiding procedural difficulties and indignities associated with daily dosing in carceral settings (e.g., mouth checks, stigmatizing treatment from correctional staff); avoiding daily reminders of their addiction; experiencing less withdrawal; having extra time for other activities, such as work; and reduction of diversion of MOUD within the jail setting. Participants who viewed XR-Bup less favorably preferred to maintain their daily dosing routine; liked daily time out of their housing unit; wanted to know what was "going into my body everyday"; and feared needles and adverse events. Participants also reported that jail clinicians used XR-Bup for patients who were previously caught diverting sublingual buprenorphine, suggesting limited patient participation in decision-making around XR-Bup initiation in some jails. CONCLUSION: People who received MOUD in Massachusetts jails had both favorable and unfavorable views and experiences with XR-Bup. Understanding these preferences can inform protocols in jails that are considering implementation of XR-Bup treatment.

Clinical Pharmacist with DEA License: Efforts to Increase Access to Buprenorphine in a Veteran Population.

BACKGROUND: Opioid overdoses continue to rise in the United States. In 2021, a record 80,411 reported overdoses occurred in the US alone, nearly double that in 2017. Buprenorphine's pharmacology is ideal for management of patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) with or without chronic pain. Within the VA, clinical pharmacist practitioners (CPP) are uniquely equipped to operate with significant scope of practice to prescribe medications including controlled substances, an opportunity to vastly increase access to care for veterans suffering from OUD, complex opioid dependency or pain. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this case series is to describe how DEA licensed pain CPP safely and effectively manages 1) Suboxone home inductions to increase access for OUD 2) rotations from traditional full mu opioids to chronic pain buprenorphine products and 3) off label use of Suboxone for pain. Procedures/data/observations: Cases were collected in usual workload for clinical pharmacist. High rate of tolerability and efficacy noted with buprenorphine across all products. CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATIONS: DEA licensed Pain CPPs can make an immediate positive impact for veterans with OUD and/or complex pain and may be more comfortable with buprenorphine than many other providers.

Buprenorphine: Not Just Another Opioid - Understanding the World's Most Interesting Opioid.

BACKGROUND: In this talk we will delve deep into the pharmacology of this drug and how it's receptor interactions are unique and then we will take that understanding and apply it to clinical usage to see how this drug behaves in a variety of situations. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: Specifically we will look at the safety profile of this drug, including it's ceiling effect on respiratory depression. Then we will look at efficacy, how well does this drug work in the treatment of pain. We will look at analgesia, tolerance and anti-hyperalgesic properties of buprenorphine. We will discus why this drug is so versatile anyhow versatility is a key asset when it comes to using buprenorphine for the treatment of pain. CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATIONS: The last section of this talk will look at the specific area of preoperative use of buprenorphine and why buprenorphine should be continued throughout the pre- operative period.

Outpatient Cross-Titration to Buprenorphine for Chronic Pain.

BACKGROUND: Various protocols for micro-induction of buprenorphine in patients with opioid use disorder have been published. There is a paucity of literature similarly describing micro- induction in patients converting from full agonist opioids to buprenorphine for chronic pain. As the prescription opioid epidemic continues to be problematic and more patients are being converted to buprenorphine, we are working to provide more guidance on goal dosages of buprenorphine and how to safely cross-titrate to that goal. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: As the prescription opioid epidemic continues to be problematic and more patients are being converted to buprenorphine, we are working to provide more guidance on goal dosages of buprenorphine and how to safely cross-titrate to that goal. Procedures/data/observations: Our cross-titration protocol resulted in roughly half (15/31) patients successfully converting to and continuing with buprenorphine at 4 weeks, with an average duration of induction of 29 days. Average end titration dose for patients on buprenorphine/naloxone SL films was 7.9 ± 5.7 mg/day. Patients previously taking >120 mg MEDD stabilized on 8-16 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATIONS: Clinical responses were widely variable, and many required slower taper and higher end titration buprenorphine dose than anticipated. Future work is focused on determining which factors contribute to the variation and whether adjustment to the protocol is warranted.

Partial Agonist, Full Barrier: A Case-Based Discussion on Challenges with Buprenorphine in Chronic Pain Management.

BACKGROUND: More patients are on chronic opioids, as patients who were initially started on full agonist opioids for cancer-related pain are living longer. Despite doing well from the cancer stand- point, some patients have difficulty tapering off their opioids because they have been taking them for years. Given the potential complications of chronic full agonist opioids, it is important to manage these patients in a safer way. However, there are various challenges including lack of education for patients and healthcare professionals and lack of product availability. Many healthcare providers do not have much formal training on initiating, maintaining, and tapering the various buprenorphine products. These providers may not be able to effectively educate patients given the lack of education. Also, patients research these products on their own and are hesitant to try them because of misinformation. Even if patients are informed thoroughly about buprenorphine, there are barriers to obtaining them including insurance denial and lack of product availability at pharmacies. Given the above challenges, easily accessible best practices as well as avenues for healthcare professionals to educate and guide each other are needed. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: Given the potential complications of chronic full agonist opioids, it is important to manage these patients in a safer way. However, there are various challenges including lack of education for patients and healthcare professionals and lack of product availability. CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATIONS: Given the above challenges, easily accessible best practices as well as avenues for healthcare professionals to educate and guide each other are needed.

Emerging Trends in Perioperative Buprenorphine Management.

BACKGROUND: Historically, there has been limited evidence and no clear consensus suggesting best practices for perioperative buprenorphine management (PBM). Previously published PBM strategies included a wide variation in dosing, complexity, and clinical decision making points. Importantly, there are limited published algorithms reporting corresponding patient outcomes data. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To review the literature for newly published perioperative PBM strategies, with the aims of identifying emerging trends and assessing patient outcomes data. Procedures/data/observations: Literature review of manuscripts published from 2020 to current containing PBM strategies. CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATIONS: Pending completion of analysis, the authors will present findings of emerging trends and patient outcomes data in PBM.

The "Micro"cosm: Magnifying the Nuance of Low Dose Buprenorphine Inductions.

BACKGROUND: Now that the X-wavier is a thing of the past, patients with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) who previously lacked access to buprenorphine may have access to lower barrier care and may be looking to make the transition from either methadone or illicit fentanyl to buprenorphine. This can be quite challenging and both fentanyl and methadone are hihghly potent drugs and can result in a difficult transtition to buprenorphine. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: A transition from high potency opioids to buprenorphine is challenging and can cause discomfort or withdrawal in patients. Procedures/data/observations: Patients tend to have a difficult time when undergoing a transition from significant fentanyl use (> 1 bundle/day) or high dose methadone to buprenorphine. Over the last year, we've supported this transition for our hospitalized patients and have learned some tips and tricks to ease the transitions. Through our work we've come up with a strategy to transition patients that includes utilizing full mu agonists while initiating a low dose buprenorphine induction. We have developed an informal protocol for this transition that takes advantage of the flexibility of low dose buprenorphine induction strategies and includes the use of non-opioid adjuvant medications to control symptoms of discomfort and withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATIONS: A transition from the use of significant fentanyl or high dose methadone to buprenorphine is possible and can take place over a matter of a few days. Such a transition requires careful attention to patient symptoms, availability of as needed short acting opioids, and the judicious use of non-opioid adjuvants.

Conversion of CII Opioid Medications to Buprenorphine in the Chronic Pain Population - Insights and Clinical Pearls.

BACKGROUND: There is a great deal of confusion associated with conversion from CII opioid to buprenorphine products. The data presented supports that patients can be converted from high dose opioid medication to buprenorphine products safely and effectively. This presentation will provide a road map to help guide practitioners who are interested in applying this to their clinical practice. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: Thepurposeoftheresearchwasnotonlytodiscoverifconversiontoapartialagonist CIII medication from full agonist CII medications would be achieveable without sacrificing analgesia, but also to provide guidance to providerswhoareinterestedinpursuingthisoptioninclinicalpractice. Procedures/data/observations: Patients who met inclusion criteria were stratified into subgroups on the basis of pre- conversion morphine milligram equivalents, whether they remained on opioids for breakthrough pain postconversion, and pre- and postconversion numerical rating scale pain scores. Outcomes of interest included the differences between pre- and postconversion numerical rating scale pain scores and daily morphine milligram equivalents for each sub-group. Of 157 patients reviewed, 87.9% were successfully converted to buprenor-phine buccal film. Overall, numericalrating scale pain scores were stable after conversion. Statistically significant reductions were demonstrated in the <90 daily morphine milligram equivalent subgroup. Postconversion daily morphine milligram equivalents decreased by 85.4% from baseline. Change in daily morphine milligram equivalents is representative of patients who remained on breakthrough pain medication. CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATIONS: Results demonstrate continued analgesia after conversion to buprenorphine buccal film despite reductions in daily morphine milligram equivalents. Most patients were able to convert directly from their long-acting opioid to buprenorphine buccal film and stabilized without the use of concomitant opioids for breakthrough pain. Aggressive titration strategies were associated with greater success. This data proves that conversion from full agonist CII medications is possible without sacrificing analgesia while reducing the risk of adverse events associated with full agonist CII medications.

Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Pain in Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Opioids remain the cornerstone for the treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain. Due to benefits over full agonist opioids (FAO), buprenorphine has emerged as an alternative treatment. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: Buprenorphine is only approved for the treatment of pain that is chronic non-cancer. Cancer-related pain is often progressive with breakthrough pain. There is limited evidence for using short-acting FAO in combination with buprenorphine. There are concerns about withdrawal and the efficacy of pain control using buprenorphine. We hypothesize buprenorphine, in combination with short-acting FAOs, can adequately control cancer- related pain without causing withdrawal symptoms. Procedures/data/observations: Our prospective, single-arm, open-label study enrolls patients with cancer-related pain who are on buprenorphine in combination with an FAO at > 30 mg OME/day, either requiring long-acting pain relief or their pain is not controlled with an FAO alone. Our study is ongoing, with 15 patients enrolled and a target of 50. The patient's pain is self-assessed daily using a mobile application. Withdrawal is assessed regularly using a modified Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) score. CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATIONS: Buprenorphine appears to be effective for the treatment of cancer pain without causing withdrawal in combination with short-acting FAO >30 mg/day.

Buprenorphine: Opioid Agonist-Antagonist for Refractory Pain of Sickle Cell Disease Patients During Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant, Uncontrolled By Full-Agonist Opioids.

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow transplant (BMT) offers potential cure for cancer and a spectrum of otherwise incur- able diseases. The BMT process can cause multi-systemic pain in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) refractory to high-dose opioid analgesics during BMT because of their pre-existing opioid-tolerance. Because of frequent pain resulting in hyperalgesia and chronic opioid use, SCD patients undergoing BMT often experience excruciating pain uncontrolled by exceedingly high-dose opioids with severe and intolerable adverse effects. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: There is a small but growing body of literature about the successful buprenorphine effect for SCD's chronic pain management that had failed sufficient pain relief by the traditional full-agonist opioids in the outpatient setting. However, the buprenorphine use for acute inpatient pain management has not been previously researched. Pilot prospective clinical trial with buprenorphine-based pain management for acute BMT-related pain was initiated for SCD patients' pain uncontrolled by full-agonist opioids. Procedures/data/observations: Buprenorphine was started as scheduled and as-needed analgesics, supplemented by full-agonist opioids upon consultation for uncontrolled BMT-related pain of SCD patients. Patients' 24-hour opioid requirement by morphine equivalent daily doses (MEDD) were assessed at 3 time points: 1)immediately before pain escalation; 2)consultation; 3)discharge. MEDDs were compared to those of patients treated with full-agonist opioids only. Cases treated by full-agonist opioids (morphine/hydromorphone/fentanyl/methadone/oxycodone) had MEDD escalation by 1230-16300% by discharge compared to immediately before BMT-related pain escalation. Buprenorphine-supported cases had significantly smaller MEDD increase by 220-317%. CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATIONS: Our case series suggests superior pain control by adding Buprenorphine prior to opioid dose escalation during BMT for SCD. Buprenorphine may provide the advantageous effect for other patients with complex pain background and experiencing difficult pain management during BMT due to pre-existing hyperalgesia and high opioid-tolerance. The evidence for buprenorphine's analgesic effect is moderate but growing, and more randomized controlled trials comparing the buprenorphine and other standard opioids are needed.

Association of Daily Doses of Buprenorphine With Urgent Health Care Utilization.

Importance: Higher buprenorphine doses may benefit the increasing number of individuals using fentanyl and other synthetic opioids, but there is little empirical evidence on the efficacy of such higher doses. Objective: To examine the association between higher buprenorphine doses (above 16 mg and 24 mg) and subsequent emergency department (ED) or inpatient service use among patients diagnosed with opioid use disorder. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was a retrospective analysis of health data from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database from 2016 to 2021 for commercially insured individuals aged 18 years or older diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD). Eligible participants initiated buprenorphine after at least 90 days of enrollment and were dispensed at least a 14-day supply of buprenorphine. Data were analyzed from September 2023 through February 2024. Exposures: Maximum buprenorphine dose received by a patient for 14 or more days: more than 24 mg, more than 16 mg to 24 mg, more than 8 mg to 16 mg, or 1 mg to 8 mg. Main Outcomes and Measures: Days from initiation of the maximum buprenorphine dose to an ED or inpatient visit for a behavioral health diagnosis, controlling for patient demographics, comorbid conditions, time to reaching maximum dose, buprenorphine discontinuation, and pre-buprenorphine health care utilization. Results: A total of 35 451 individuals with an OUD diagnosis who began buprenorphine treatment were identified (mean [SD] age, 46.2 [15.1] years; 20 983 male [59.2%]; 3326 Black [9.4%], 2411 Hispanic [6.8%], 26 712 White [75.3%]). The most common dose was more than 8 mg to 16 mg daily (14 802 patients [42.9%]), with 9669 patients (27.3%) in the 1 mg to 8 mg tier, 10 329 patients (29.1%) in the 8 mg to 16 mg tier, and 651 patients (1.8%) in the tier receiving more than 24 mg. Among all patients receiving buprenorphine, 12.5% experienced an ED or inpatient visit. Survival analysis shows patients receiving doses more than 24 mg and between 16 mg to 24 mg had longer times to ED or inpatient use than patients receiving from 8 mg to 16 mg (time ratio [TR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.20) and more than 24 mg (TR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.81). Findings for doses above 16 mg daily were consistent for observation windows as short as 365 days (more than 24 mg: TR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.01-2.18; more than 16 mg to 24 mg: TR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06-1.32). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings contribute to the sparse empirical research regarding potential benefits of higher-dose buprenorphine treatment of individuals with OUD. Clinicians should be aware of the potential effects of higher buprenorphine doses on health care utilization while policymakers work to ensure equitable access to individuals who could potentially benefit from higher doses.

Ketamine-assisted buprenorphine initiation: a pilot case series.

BACKGROUND: Many people with opioid use disorder who stand to benefit from buprenorphine treatment are unwilling to initiate it due to experience with or fear of both spontaneous and buprenorphine-precipitated opioid withdrawal (BPOW). An effective means of minimizing withdrawal symptoms would reduce patient apprehensiveness, lowering the barrier to buprenorphine initiation. Ketamine, approved by the FDA as a dissociative anesthetic, completely resolved BPOW in case reports when infused at a sub-anesthetic dose range in which dissociative symptoms are common. However, most patients attempt buprenorphine initiation in the outpatient setting where altered mental status is undesirable. We explored the potential of short-term use of ketamine, self-administered sublingually at a lower, sub-dissociative dose to assist ambulatory patients undergoing transition to buprenorphine from fentanyl and methadone. METHODS: Patients prescribed ketamine were either (1) seeking transition to buprenorphine from illicit fentanyl and highly apprehensive of BPOW or (2) undergoing transition to buprenorphine from illicit fentanyl or methadone and experiencing BPOW. We prescribed 4-8 doses of sublingual ketamine 16 mg (each dose bioequivalent to 3-6% of an anesthetic dose), monitored patients daily or near-daily, and adjusted buprenorphine and ketamine dosing based on patient response and prescriber experience. RESULTS: Over a period of 14 months, 37 patients were prescribed ketamine. Buprenorphine initiation was completed by 16 patients, representing 43% of the 37 patients prescribed ketamine, and 67% of the 24 who reported trying it. Of the last 12 patients who completed buprenorphine initiation, 11 (92%) achieved 30-day retention in treatment. Most of the patients who tried ketamine reported reduction or elimination of spontaneous opioid withdrawal symptoms. Some patients reported avoidance of severe BPOW when used prophylactically or as treatment of established BPOW. We developed a ketamine protocol that allowed four of the last patients to complete buprenorphine initiation over four days reporting only mild withdrawal symptoms. Two patients described cognitive changes from ketamine at a dose that exceeded the effective dose range for the other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine at a sub-dissociative dose allowed completion of buprenorphine initiation in the outpatient setting in the majority of patients who reported trying it. Further research is warranted to confirm these results and develop reliable protocols for a range of treatment settings.

Opioid Use and the Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The association between opioid use and the risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) is poorly understood. AIMS: The objective of this study was to synthesize the evidence on the risk of VA associated with opioid use. MATERIALS & METHODS: We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases in July 2022. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk for bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ROBINS-I for observational studies. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: We included 15 studies (12 observational, 2 post hoc analyses of RCTs, 1 RCT). Most studies focused on opioid use for maintenance therapy (n = 9), comparing methadone to buprenorphine (n = 13), and reported QTc prolongation (n = 13). Six observational studies had a critical risk of bias, and one RCT was at high risk of bias. Two studies could not be included in the meta-analysis as they reported a different outcome and studied an opioid antagonist. Meta-analysis of 13 studies indicated that the use of methadone was associated with an increased risk of VA compared to the use of buprenorphine, morphine, placebo, or levacetylmethadol (risk ratio [RR], 2.39; 95% CI, 1.31-4.35; I2 = 60%). The pooled estimate varied greatly between observational studies (RR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.15-3.91; I2 = 62%) and RCTs (RR, 14.09; 95% CI, 1.52-130.61; I2 = 0%), but both indicated an increased risk. CONCLUSION: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that methadone use is associated with more than twice the risk of VA compared to comparators. However, our findings should be interpreted cautiously given the limited quality of the available evidence.

Successful administration of extended-release buprenorphine in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: The ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States has resulted in a substantial increase in overdose deaths and related morbidity and mortality. Given that emergency departments (ED) frequently serve as the initial point of contact for individuals experiencing opioid overdose or seeking treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), ED clinicians have a pivotal role to play in providing prompt and effective treatment for OUD. While ED clinicians routinely administer sublingual and other transmucosal formulations of buprenorphine, extended-release buprenorphine (BUP-XR) remains underutilized in the ED. CASE REPORT: We present a case involving the successful administration of BUP-XR in the ED to a patient experiencing spontaneous opioid withdrawal. The patient tolerated test dosing of sublingual buprenorphine (BUP-SL) and subsequently received BUP-XR in the ED. Following this intervention, the patient was referred to the hospital-affiliated substance use disorder outpatient clinic, where he has since demonstrated successful follow-up and retention in treatment. CONCLUSION: Our report adds to the existing limited literature on the administration of BUP-XR in the ED and highlights the need for more comprehensive clinician teaching and guidance, as well as the establishment of in-hospital protocols for BUP-XR. Despite these challenges, our case indicates that initiating BUP-XR could be a viable and effective option for ED patients with OUD.

Comparative Safety of In Utero Exposure to Buprenorphine Combined With Naloxone vs Buprenorphine Alone.

Importance: Buprenorphine combined with naloxone is commonly used to treat opioid use disorders outside of pregnancy. In pregnancy, buprenorphine alone is generally recommended because of limited perinatal safety data on the combination product. Objective: To compare perinatal outcomes following prenatal exposure to buprenorphine with naloxone vs buprenorphine alone. Design, Settings, and Participants: Population-based cohort study using health care utilization data from Medicaid-insured beneficiaries in the US from 2000 to 2018. The cohort was restricted to pregnant individuals linked to their liveborn infants, with maternal Medicaid enrollment from 3 months before pregnancy to 1 month after delivery and infant enrollment for the first 3 months after birth, unless they died sooner. Exposure: Use of buprenorphine with naloxone vs buprenorphine alone during the first trimester based on outpatient dispensings. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included major congenital malformations, low birth weight, neonatal abstinence syndrome, neonatal intensive care unit admission, preterm birth, respiratory symptoms, small for gestational age, cesarean delivery, and maternal morbidity. Confounder-adjusted risk ratios were calculated using propensity score overlap weights. Results: This study identified 3369 pregnant individuals exposed to buprenorphine with naloxone during the first trimester (mean [SD] age, 28.8 [4.6] years) and 5326 exposed to buprenorphine alone or who switched from the combination to buprenorphine alone by the end of the first trimester (mean [SD] age, 28.3 [4.5] years). When comparing buprenorphine combined with naloxone with buprenorphine alone, a lower risk for neonatal abstinence syndrome (absolute risk, 37.4% vs 55.8%; weighted relative risk, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.70-0.84]) and a modestly lower risk for neonatal intensive care unit admission (absolute risk, 30.6% vs 34.9%; weighted relative risk, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.85-0.98]) and small for gestational age (absolute risk, 10.0% vs 12.4%; weighted relative risk, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.75-0.98]) was observed. For maternal morbidity, the comparative rates were 2.6% vs 2.9%, respectively, and the weighted relative risk was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.68-1.19). No differences were observed with respect to major congenital malformations overall, low birth weight, preterm birth, respiratory symptoms, or cesarean delivery. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: There were similar and, in some instances, more favorable neonatal and maternal outcomes for pregnancies exposed to buprenorphine combined with naloxone compared with buprenorphine alone. For the outcomes assessed, compared with buprenorphine alone, buprenorphine with naloxone during pregnancy appears to be a safe treatment option. This supports the view that both formulations are reasonable options for the treatment of opioid use disorder in pregnancy, affirming flexibility in collaborative treatment decision-making.

Buprenorphine Induction in Trauma Patients With Opioid Use Disorder - A Single Center Experience?

INTRODUCTION: Buprenorphine is a Food and Drug Administration-approved therapy for opioid use disorder, with proven efficacy in treatment retention and reduction in opioid use and mortality. Low-dose buprenorphine initiation or microinduction is a novel means of initiation that may allow for an easier transition in patients. Trauma patients have high rates of opioid use disorder and patient directed discharges (PDD). We hypothesized that patients initiated on a buprenorphine microinduction program would have increased protocol completion and fewer PDD compared with patients initiated historically on a traditional induction. METHODS: Our retrospective cohort study compared buprenorphine microinduction and traditional induction in trauma patients at an urban level one trauma center between December 2020 and June 2022. Patients aged 18-89 y with traumatic injuries who received buprenorphine were included. Our primary outcome was in-hospital protocol completion, defined as reaching 16 mg of buprenorphine within 24 h or a documented stable dose. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square for categorical variables and two sample t-tests for continuous variables. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were included, with 46 initiating with microinduction and 52 initiating with traditional induction. There was no difference in protocol completion, (P = 0.29) and 83% of subjects who started an induction protocol completed it. Those who completed a protocol were more likely to be discharged home (P = 0.0002), had less PDD (P = 0.001), and had an increased likelihood of attending outpatient addiction clinic follow-up (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the protocol type, buprenorphine induction can be implemented in trauma patients with high protocol completion rates. In our population, those who complete a protocol had a higher likelihood of discharge home and postdischarge follow-up in addiction medicine clinic.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of transdermal buprenorphine patch to conventional analgesics after operative fixation of extra capsular fracture of proximal femur.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal femur fractures are common among older individuals and pose challenges in achieving effective post-operative analgesia. Age-related co-morbidities limit the selection of analgesics in this population. This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of transdermal buprenorphine (TDB) patch with traditional analgesics after fixation of an extracapsular fracture of the proximal femur. METHODOLOGY: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted over a 2-year period, involving 60 patients who underwent surgery for extra capsular intertrochanteric fracture fixation. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups by random envelope method. Group A received an intravenous formulation of paracetamol and tramadol for the initial 48 h, followed by an oral formulation. Group B received a transdermal buprenorphine (TDB) patch delivering 5 mcg/hour immediately after surgery, which continued for 2 weeks postoperatively. During the 14-day monitoring period, patients' pain scores were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest and during movement. The primary objective was to maintain a VAS score of 4 or lower. Rescue analgesics were administered if the VAS score reached 6. The secondary objectives included evaluating the quantity of rescue analgesics required and monitoring for any adverse effects or complications. RESULTS: Pain scores at rest and during movement were significantly lower in Group B at all-time points (p-value 0.0006 - ≤ 0.0001), and the requirement for rescue analgesia was also significantly lower in this group. The administration of the TDB patch did not result in any significant adverse effects. CONCLUSION: TDB patch is secure and offers better compliance and analgesia than other analgesics in the postoperative period whilst treating proximal femur extra capsular fracture.

Refining pain management in mice by comparing multimodal analgesia and NSAID monotherapy for neurosurgical procedures.

While neurosurgical interventions are frequently used in laboratory mice, refinement efforts to optimize analgesic management based on multimodal approaches appear to be rather limited. Therefore, we compared the efficacy and tolerability of combinations of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug carprofen, a sustained-release formulation of the opioid buprenorphine, and the local anesthetic bupivacaine with carprofen monotherapy. Female and male C57BL/6J mice were subjected to isoflurane anesthesia and an intracranial electrode implant procedure. Given the multidimensional nature of postsurgical pain and distress, various physiological, behavioral, and biochemical parameters were applied for their assessment. The analysis revealed alterations in Neuro scores, home cage locomotion, body weight, nest building, mouse grimace scales, and fecal corticosterone metabolites. A composite measure scheme allowed the allocation of individual mice to severity classes. The comparison between groups failed to indicate the superiority of multimodal regimens over high-dose NSAID monotherapy. In conclusion, our findings confirmed the informative value of various parameters for assessment of pain and distress following neurosurgical procedures in mice. While all drug regimens were well tolerated in control mice, our data suggest that the total drug load should be carefully considered for perioperative management. Future studies would be of interest to assess potential synergies of drug combinations with lower doses of carprofen.