Combined laser and mechanical lithotripsy for endoscopic management of Bouveret's syndrome: A case report.

Bouveret's syndrome (BS) represents an exceedingly rare clinical entity characterized by gastric outlet obstruction induced by a gallstone passing through a cholecystoduodenal, cholecystogastric or choledochoduodenal fistula and impacting in the duodenum or pylorus. Endoscopy is the preferred first-line therapy. It has a favorable safety profile, but requires high level of expertise to achieve stone clearance.

Diagnostic value of T-tube cholangiography and choledochoscopy in residual calculi after biliary surgery.

BACKGROUND: T-tube cholangiography and choledochoscopy are commonly used techniques for detecting residual bile duct stones after biliary surgery. However, the utility of routine cholangiography before T-tube removal needs further investigation. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of various methods for detecting residual calculi following biliary surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 287 adult patients who underwent common bile duct exploration with T-tube drainage, followed by T-tube cholangiography and choledochoscopy, at the Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, between 2017 and 2022. Exclusion criteria were patients with bile duct tumors, incomplete medical records or loss to follow-up, and patients with contraindications to T-tube or choledochoscopy. McNemanr test and Kappa test were used to compare the results and consistency between choledochoscopy and T-tube cholangiography. All patients underwent both cholangiography and choledochoscopy six to eight weeks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with common bile duct exploration and T-tube drainage. The results of T-tube cholangiography and choledochoscopy for each patient were recorded, analyzed, and compared. RESULTS: Among the 287 patients, T-tube cholangiography detected residual stones in 38 cases, which were confirmed by choledochoscopy in 29 cases. Conversely, of the 249 patients without evidence of residual stones on T-tube angiography, 11 patient was later found to have retained stones through choledochoscopy. There was no significant difference between the results of T-tube cholangiography and choledochoscopy (P = 0.82), indicating a high level of agreement between the two methods (Kappa value: 0.70) (95% CI, 0.65-0.76). CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy between T-tube cholangiography and choledochoscopy for detecting residual bile duct stones after surgery (P = 0.82). The two methods demonstrated a high level of consistency (Kappa value: 0.70) (95% CI, 0.65-0.76). The choice of diagnostic method for postoperative residual bile duct stones should be based on the specific condition of the patient.

Successful application of percutaneous endoscopic cholangioscopy + electrohydraulic lithotripsy for hepatolithiasis post-liver transplantation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation in pediatric patients is a crucial intervention for treating end-stage hepatic diseases. Despite significant advances in surgical techniques and postoperative care, complications remain a substantial challenge in this population. Biliary stones, an infrequent complication, present challenges in this context. Given the impossibility of endoscopic treatments, different strategies have been explored to address post-liver transplantation gallstones in children by implementing percutaneous treatment with intraductal lithotripsy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 7-year-old Latin patient, who had a diagnosis of biliary atresia at the age of 2, underwent a liver transplant from a living donor. However, 4 months after the transplant, the patient experienced recurring episodes of cholangitis. Cholangioresonance revealed intrahepatic lithiasis and anastomotic stenosis. Attempted gallstone removal through percutaneous cholangiography proved unsuccessful, as multiple peripheral stones in all ducts remained immobile. Subsequently, a percutaneous endoscopic cholangioscopy using the SpyGlass Discover system for visual examination of the bile ducts + electrohydraulic lithotripsy was performed, effectively removing the stones without any complications. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous cholangioscopy with intraductal lithotripsy enables accurate identification and extraction of intrahepatic stones without the need for surgical intervention. This method proves to be a valuable alternative in addressing post-transplant biliary stone. In our case, it was performed on a pediatric patient who underwent liver transplantation, which makes it interesting and relevant as there is currently insufficient literature on this approach in such cases in this population.

'H-type' duplex gallbladder resected laparoscopically with transcystic choledochoscopy and stone retrieval.

A duplex gallbladder is an extremely rare congenital anomaly that while may remain asymptomatic, may also develop into biliary colic, cholecystitis, cholangitis or pancreatitis. In these circumstances, it is advisable to surgically remove both gallbladders. Typically, a cholecystectomy is performed laparoscopically as this aids patient recovery and complication risk; however, when congenital abnormalities are present, some may choose to revert to an open operation. Through this case, we demonstrate that even when presented with a duplex gallbladder during surgery, it is safe to remove it laparoscopically as well as performing transcystic choledochoscopy and basket retrieval without complications.

Intraoperative imaging and management of common duct stones during subtotal cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Subtotal cholecystectomy is advocated in patients with severe inflammation and distorted anatomy preventing safe removal of the entire gallbladder. Not well documented in this surgically complex population is the feasibility of intraoperative imaging and management of common bile duct (CBD) stones. We evaluated these operative maneuvers in our subtotal cholecystectomy patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cholecystectomy cases from 2014 to 2023 at a single Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center using VASQIP (VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program), selecting subtotal cholecystectomy cases for detailed analysis. We reviewed operative reports, imaging and laboratory studies, and clinical notes to understand biliary imaging, stone management, complications, and late outcomes including retained stones (within 6 months), and recurrent stones (beyond 6 months). RESULTS: 419 laparoscopic (n = 406) and open (n = 13) cholecystectomies were performed, including 40 subtotal cholecystectomies (36 laparoscopic, 4 laparoscopic converted to open). Among these 40 patients IOC was attempted in 35 and completed in 26, with successful stone management in 11 (9 common bile duct exploration [CBDE], 2 intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP]). In follow-up, 3 additional patients had CBD stones managed by ERCP, including 1 with a negative IOC and 2 without IOC. Thus, 14 (35%) of 40 patients had CBD stones. Of note, IOC permitted identification and oversewing or closure of the cystic duct in 32 patients. There were no major bile duct injuries and one cystic duct stump leak (2.5%) that resolved spontaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Subtotal cholecystectomy patients had a high incidence of bile duct stones, with most detected and managed intraoperatively with CBDE, making a strong argument for routine IOC and single-stage care. When intraoperative imaging is not possible, postoperative imaging should be considered. Routine imaging, biliary clearance, and cystic duct closure during subtotal cholecystectomy is feasible in most patients with low rates of retained stones and bile leaks.

Early Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Gallstone Pancreatitis Is Safe: Results From a Large Single-Center Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVES: There is concern that performing early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the setting of gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) with choledocholithiasis can worsen underlying pancreatitis. This study was designed to assess outcomes of early versus delayed ERCP in patients with GSP with choledocholithiasis in the absence of cholangitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, we identified 124 patients who underwent ERCP for choledocholithiasis in the setting of GSP without cholangitis between 2012 and 2022. Timing of ERCP was categorized as early (<48 hours after time of diagnosis) versus delayed (>48 hours). Data on patient demographics, complications, length of stay (LOS), and mortality were collected. RESULTS: Cannulation success rates were similar for early and delayed ERCP (97% vs 100%). The adverse event rate for early ERCP was 15% compared to 29% for delayed ERCP. LOS for patients with predicted mild pancreatitis was shorter for early versus delayed ERCP (4.2 vs 7.1 days, P = 0.007). There were no deaths in either group. CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend toward fewer adverse events and there was a shorter LOS among patients with GSP with choledocholithiasis undergoing early versus delayed ERCP. Early ERCP should be considered, particularly in patients with predicted mild pancreatitis.

Prevalence and risk factors for gallstone and renal stone formation in patients with intestinal Behçet's disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The association between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and gallstone and renal stone formation has been established. However, few studies have investigated this association in patients with intestinal Behçet's disease (BD). We aimed to examine the prevalence of gallstones and renal stones in patients with intestinal BD and identify potential risk factors. METHODS: We analyzed gallstone and renal stone occurrences in 553 patients diagnosed with intestinal BD who had undergone cross-sectional imaging examinations between March 2005 and April 2021 at the IBD Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. Logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for gallstone and renal stone formation. RESULTS: Of 553 patients over a mean 12.1-year duration, 141 (25.4%) patients had gallstones and 35 (6.3%) had renal stones. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, disease duration > 19 years (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.56-5.44, 0.002). No significant correlation 0.001), prior intestinal BD-related surgery (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.42-3.68, p < 0.001), and disease activity index for intestinal BD scores ≥ 75 (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.12-4.45, p = 0.022) were associated with increased gallstone occurrence. A positive correlation was observed between renal stones, disease duration > 19 years (OR 5.61, 95% CI 1.98-15.90, p = 0.001) and frequent hospitalization (> 3 times) (OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.52-7.13, p = 0.002). No significant correlation was observed between gallstone and renal stone occurrence. CONCLUSION: These findings contribute to greater understanding concerning gallstone and renal stone prevalence and associated risk factors in patients with intestinal BD.

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute mild gallstone pancreatitis. Is there a role for routine admission contrast-enhanced CT Scan?

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of admission contrast-enhanced CT scans in formulating strategies for performing early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cases of acute gallstone pancreatitis. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with acute gallstone pancreatitis underwent a CT scan upon admission (after at least 24 h from symptom onset) to confirm diagnosis and assess peripancreatic fluid, collections, gallstones, and common bile duct stones. Patients with mild acute gallstone pancreatitis, following the Atlanta classification and Baltazar score A or B, were identified as candidates for early cholecystectomy (within 72 h of admission). RESULTS: Within the analyzed period, 272 patients were diagnosed with mild acute gallstone pancreatitis according to the Atlanta Guidelines. A total of 33 patients (12.1%) were excluded: 17 (6.25%) due to SIRS, 10 (3.6%) due to local complications identified in CT (Balthazar D/E), and 6 (2.2%) due to severe comorbidities. Enhanced CT scans accurately detected gallstones, common bile duct stones, pancreatic enlargement, inflammation, pancreatic collections, and peripancreatic fluid. Among the cohort, 239 patients were selected for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Routine intraoperative cholangiogram was conducted in all cases, and where choledocholithiasis was present, successful treatment occurred through common bile duct exploration. Only one case required conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. There were no observed severe complications or mortality. CONCLUSION: Admission CT scans are instrumental in identifying clinically stable patients with local tomographic complications that contraindicate early surgery. Patients meeting the criteria for mild acute gallstone pancreatitis, as per Atlanta guidelines, without SIRS or local complications (Baltazar D/E), can safely undergo early cholecystectomy within the initial 72 h of admission.

Benefits and risks of using laparoscopic ultrasonography versus intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) or intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) can be used for visualisation of the biliary tract during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this systematic review was to compare use of LUS with IOC. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched (last update: April 2024). PICO: P = patients undergoing intraoperative imaging of the biliary tree during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstone disease; I = intervention: LUS; C = comparison: IOC; O = outcomes: mortality, bile duct injury, retained gallstone, conversion to open cholecystectomy, procedural failure, operation time including imaging time. Included articles were critically appraised using checklists. Conclusions were based on studies without major risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models. Certainty of evidence was assessed according to GRADE. RESULTS: Sixteen non-randomised studies met the PICO. Two before/after studies (594 versus 807 patients) contributed to conclusions regarding mortality (no events; very low certainty evidence), bile duct injury (1 versus 0 events; very low certainty evidence), retained gallstone (2 versus 2 events; very low certainty evidence), and conversion to open cholecystectomy (6 versus 21 events; risk ratio: 0.38 (95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.95); I2 = 0%; low certainty evidence). Seven additional studies, using intra-individual comparisons, contributed to conclusions regarding procedural failure; risk ratio: 1.12 (95% confidence interval: 0.70-1.78; I2 = 83%; very low certainty evidence). No studies reported operation time. Mean imaging time for LUS and IOC, reported in 12 studies, was 4.8‒10.2 versus 10.9‒17.9 min (mean difference: - 7.8 min (95% confidence interval: - 9.3 to - 6.3); I2 = 95%; moderate certainty evidence). CONCLUSION: It is uncertain whether there is any difference in mortality/bile duct injury/retained gallstone using LUS compared with IOC, but LUS may be associated with fewer conversions to open cholecystectomy and is probably associated with shorter imaging time.

The "Tumbling Gallstone Sign" of Obstructive Gallstone Ileus.

The "tumbling gallstone sign" is a diagnostic imaging finding described on radiologic examinations of the abdomen, in patients with cholelithiasis associated with intermittent episodes of gallstone obstructive ileus.  Best seen on serial radiographs or CT studies of the abdomen, this sign indicates a sudden change in position of the gallstone(s) within the intestinal lumen from the upper segments of the bowel to the lower segments of the bowel, causing transient mechanical bowel obstruction.  The tumbling gallstone sign has been likened to that of the classic childrens' tumbling tower balancing game.  On repeat CT scans, the dislodged gallstone(s) may be seen proceeding distally and impact in the ileum at a level lower than that seen on the previous CT scans, analogous to the tumbling gallstone sign.

Predicting gallstone pancreatitis in HIV infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, low cluster of differentiation (CD)4 counts and antiretroviral therapy can cause cholestasis and raised transaminases. In acute pancreatitis, this may render biochemical predictors of a gallstone aetiology inaccurate. METHODS: In a prospective observational study, acute pancreatitis was diagnosed by standard criteria. Cholecystolithiasis and bile duct diameter were diagnosed by ultrasound. Cholestasis was defined as two of the following: bilirubin ≥ 21 umol/l, γ glutamyl transferase ≥ 78 U/l, alkaline phosphatase ≥ 121 U/l. Cholangitis was defined as cholestasis and any two sepsis criteria: (temperature > 38˚C, WCC > 12.6 ×109/L, pulse > 90 beats/min). Cholangitis, cholestasis, and bile duct diameter greater that 1 cm were indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). These parameters' ability to predict gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) and choledocholithiasis were compared in HIV+ve and HIV-ve patients. RESULTS: Sixty-two (26%) of 216 patients had GSP. Twenty four were HIV+ve patients. More HIV+ve patients had cholestasis (p = 0.059) and ERCP (p = 0.004). In HIV+ve patients alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 100 U/L, gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) > 2 upper limit of normal and cholestasis had a negative predictive value of 92%, 96.7% and 95.2% respectively. In HIV-ve patients, negative predictive value (NPV) was 84%, 83.8% and 84.6% respectively. Bile duct stones were demonstrated at ERCP in 6 (25%) and 3 (8%) of HIV+ve and HIV-ve patients respectively (p = 0.077). Five of 14 ERCP patients had no bile duct stones. HIV+ve and HIV-ve groups had two deaths each. CONCLUSION: Absence at presentation of the abnormal parameters analysed were good predictors of a non-gallstone aetiology particularly in HIV+ve patients. Prior, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) would reduce the number of non-therapeutic ERCPs.

PERCUTANEOUS CHOLANGIOSCOPY AND LASER BILIARY LITHOTRIPSY FOR BILIARY INTRAHEPATIC STONES MANAGEMENT: CASE REPORT.

Intrahepatic biliary stone disease is a difficult condition to treat, due to anatomical complexity of biliary tract, association with colestasis, and high recurrence rates, with potential short- and long-term complications, such as cholangitis and secondary biliary cirrhosis. Removal of biliary stones via intraductal access can be achieved endoscopically or percutaneously, with preference for cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy in complex cases. The surgical approach, despite its prolonged results, is a more invasive and risky procedure. The authors present a case of cholangioscopy with percutaneous laser biliary lithotripsy as an option for the treatment of intrahepatic biliary stone disease associated with biliary stricture following biliodigestive anastomosis due to bile duct injury following cholecystectomy, a safe and effective alternative with low morbidity and satisfactory outcomes in follow-up.