The Interactions of T Cells with Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts.

The interaction of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) with T cells within G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts in patients undergoing autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains to be elucidated. Through studying allo- and auto-PBSC grafts, we observed grafts containing large numbers of T cells and MDSCs with intergraft variability in their percentage and number. T cells from autologous grafts compared to allografts expressed relative higher percentages of inhibitory receptors PD-1, CTLA-4, TIM-3, LAG-3, TIGIT and BTLA. Autograft T cells had decreased cell proliferation and IFN-γ secretion, which supported the possible presence of T cell exhaustion. On the contrary, graft monocytic MDSCs (M-MDSCs) expressed multiple inhibitory receptor ligands, including PD-L1, CD86, Galectin-9, HVEM and CD155. The expression of inhibitory receptor ligands on M-MDSCs was correlated with their corresponding inhibitory receptors on T cells in the grafts. Isolated M-MDSCs had the ability to suppress T cell proliferation and IFN-γ secretion and/or promote Treg expansion. Blocking the PD-L1-PD-1 signaling pathway partially reversed the functions of M-MDSCs. Taken together, our data indicated that T cells and M-MDSCs in PBSC grafts express complementary inhibitory receptor-ligand pairing, which may impact the quality of immune recovery and clinical outcome post transplantation.

Preemptive Approach to Plerixafor Use Is Optimal in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Germ Cell Tumors Undergoing Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Collection: Effect on Collection Days, Yields, and Cost.

Evidence describing the use of plerixafor in the off-label population of relapsed/refractory germ cell tumors (GCT) is limited. We aim to describe the effect of rescue versus preemptive plerixafor use on apheresis collection days, collection yields, and cost. We retrospectively collected data on 77 consecutive patients (at least 15 years of age) with GCT who underwent peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection for autologous stem cell transplant between January 1, 2020 and May 1, 2022. Depending on insurance approval, plerixafor was given either as "rescue" (after a first apheresis collection of < 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg) or as "preemptive" on Day 4 of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prior to the first apheresis collection, if the Day 4 peripheral blood CD34+ count was < 40 cells/µL. A total of 66% of patients who received preemptive plerixafor completed collection in 1 day, similar to good mobilizers who only needed G-CSF (71%, p = 0.366). In contrast, all poor mobilizers in the rescue group required at least 2 days of collection and had lower CD34+ cell yields than the preemptive group (7.15 vs. 9.81 × 106/kg, p = 0.0055). A cost analysis revealed that preemptive plerixafor may save approximately $7000 per patient compared with a rescue approach. Preemptive plerixafor in GCT patients undergoing PBSC collection allows relatively poor mobilizers to collect in fewer days and with lower overall cost. Fewer apheresis procedures result in less risk to the patient, increased patient satisfaction, and the ability to schedule more patients within the constraints of staffing.

Apheresis product total CD34+ cell count prediction at peripheral stem cell collection via a formula: A multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: Effective mobilization of Stem Cells(SCs) to peripheral blood (PB) is crucial for obtaining sufficient CD34+ cell numbers via apheresis. The ratio of pre-apheresis PB CD34+ cells is the best parameter for predicting the product CD34+ cell count. However, quantitating CD34+ PB cells requires flow cytometry, which usually takes two or more hours to obtain the results. We hypothesized that the product CD34+ cell count could be predicted using the counts of white blood cells (WBCs), mononuclear cells (MNCs), and pre-apheresis CD34+ cells. A formula that achieves this would substantially affect the efficiency and effectiveness of apheresis. We, therefore, aimed to estimate the number of CD34+ cells in the product using a formula that incorporates pre-apheresis PB WBC, MNC, and CD34+ cell counts and product WBC and MNC counts. METHODS: We examined the results of 373 leukapheresis procedures for SC mobilization. Effective separation of CD34+ PBSCs (count/µL) via apheresis was estimated using the following formula: [Product WBC (count/µL) × MNC (count/µL) × pre-apheresis CD34+ cell (percentage/µL)] ÷ [PB WBC count/µL × PB MNC (count/µL)]. RESULTS: A strong correlation was observed between the CD34+ cell count calculated using our formula and the post-apheresis CD34+ cell count measured via flow cytometry (R = 0.939, based on linear regression analysis). In the subgroup analysis, this correlation was observed for all the disease subgroups and healthy donors. CONCLUSION: We developed a formula that predicts the product CD34+ cell count and is useful for determining whether a second apheresis procedure will be required.

Small but mighty: Case report and practical guidance for peripheral blood stem cell collection in small infants.

Modern apheresis devices, with increased procedural precision, automation, and monitoring, have been shown to allow for safe delivery of apheresis therapies in young children. Medical advances are increasing demand for apheresis procedures like mononuclear cell collection in infants <10 kg, including stem-cell supported chemotherapy, cell collection for chimeric antigen receptor T cell development, and now ex vivo gene therapies for rare genetic diseases. Nevertheless, safe delivery in small infants involves a range of unique considerations and challenges, beyond just size, and experience will vary between centers. In this case report we describe our experience performing mononuclear cell collection in our smallest patient to date and outline a practice guideline developed following a literature review and discussion with both international experts and device representatives. This case may help to inform other clinicians aiming to provide apheresis care to very small infants in their own centers.

[Comparison of etoposide combined with G-CSF and cyclophosphamide combined with G-CSF in the mobilization of autologous peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma].

Objective: The effect and safety of etoposide combined with G-CSF were compared with those of cyclophosphamide combined with G-CSF in autologous peripheral blood mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) . Methods: Patients with MM who received autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and collection in the Department of Hematology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from January 1, 2020 to July 31, 2023 were included. A total of 134 patients were screened by propensity score matching technology according to a 1∶1 ratio. A total of 67 cases were each treated with ETO combined with G-CSF mobilization scheme (ETO group) and CTX combined with G-CSF mobilization scheme (CTX group). Their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Results: ①Collection results: the ETO and CTX groups [2 (1-3) d vs 2 (1-5) d; P<0.001] and CD34(+) cells [7.62×10(6) (2.26×10(6)-37.20×10(6)) /kg vs 2.73×10(6) (0.53×10(6)-9.85×10(6)) /kg; P<0.001] were collected. The success rate of collection was 100.0% (67/67) versus 76.1% (51/67) (P<0.001). Excellent rate of collection was 82.1% (55/67) versus 20.9% (14/67; P<0.001). Two patients in the ETO group switched protocols after 1 day of collection, and 11 patients in the CTX group switched protocols after 1-2 days of collection. ②Adverse reactions: granular deficiency with fever (21.5%[14/65] vs. 10.7%[6/56]; P=0.110), requiring platelet transfusion [10.7% (7/65) vs 1.8% (1/56) ; P=0.047]. ③Until the end of follow-up, 63 cases in the ETO group and 54 cases in the CTX group have undergone autologous transplantation. The median number of CD34(+) cells infused in the two groups was 4.62×10(6) (2.14×10(6)-19.89×10(6)) /kg versus 2.62×10(6) (1.12×10(6)-5.31×10(6)) /kg (P<0.001), neutrophil implantation time was 11 (9-14) d versus 11 (10-14) d (P=0.049), and platelet implantation time was 11 (0-19) d vs. 12 (0-34) d (P=0.035). One case in the CTX group experienced delayed platelet implantation. Conclusion: The mobilization scheme of etoposide combined with G-CSF requires relatively platelet transfusion, but the collection days are shortened. The collection success rate, excellent rate, and the number of CD34(+) cells obtained are high, and the neutrophil and platelet engraftment is accelerated after transplantation.

Immune reconstitution after transplantation of autologous peripheral stem cells in children: a comparison between CD34+ selected and nonmanipulated grafts.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improves the prognosis in pediatric patients with several solid tumors and lymphomas. Little is known about the reconstitution of the immune system after ASCT and the influence of CD34+ cell selection on the reconstitution in pediatric patients. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2001, 94 pediatric patients with solid tumors and lymphomas received autologous CD34+ selected or unmanipulated peripheral stem cells after HDC. CD34+ selection was carried out with magnetic microbeads. The absolute numbers of T cells, B cells and natural killer (NK) cells were measured and compared in both groups at various time points post-transplant. RESULTS: Recovery of T cells was significantly faster in the unmanipulated group at day 30, with no significant difference later on. Reconstitution of B and NK cells was similar in both groups without significant differences at any time. The CD34+-selected group was divided into patients receiving less or more than 5.385 × 106/kg CD34+ cells. Patients in the CD34+ high-dose group displayed significantly faster reconstitutions of neutrophiles and lymphocyte subsets than the CD34+ low-dose group. CONCLUSIONS: Engraftment and reconstitution of leukocytes, B cells and NK cells after transplantation of CD34+ selected stem cells were comparable to that in patients receiving unmanipulated grafts. T-cell recovery was faster in the unmanipulated group only within the first month. However, this delay could be compensated by transplantation of >5.385 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Especially for patients receiving immunotherapy after HDC large numbers of immune effector cells such as NK and T cells are necessary to mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Therefore, in patients receiving autologous CD34+-selected grafts, our data emphasize the need to administer high stem cell counts.

Comparison of biosimilar filgrastim and originator filgrastim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Nivestym, a biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to the originator filgrastim (Neupogen), is now being used for the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We aim to compare the efficacy of Nivestym and Neupogen for PBSC mobilization in healthy allogeneic donors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study including 541 adult allo-HSCT donors receiving Nivestym (January 2013-July 2020), or Neupogen (July 2020-June 2023) for donor PBSC mobilization. Bivariate analysis was conducted using SPSS version 28. Statistical significance was determined at a p-value <.05. RESULTS: Our study included 541 allo-HSCT donors who received Neupogen (n = 345, 64%) or Nivestym (n = 196, 36%) for PBSC mobilization. The median age was 47 years (range 17-76). The median donor weight was 86 kg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87-91). Donors receiving Neupogen had similar pre-G-CSF white blood cell count, CD34+ percentages, and circulating CD34+ count compared with donors receiving Nivestym. The Neupogen group had similar median PBSC product total neutrophil count, CD34+ percentage, absolute CD34+ count, and infused CD34+ dose compared with the Nivestym group. For donors aged 35 years or younger, the median CD34+ dose was higher in donors who received Neupogen compared with Nivestym (6.9 vs. 6.3 million cells/kg, p = .044). CONCLUSIONS: Nivestym demonstrated similar efficacy for PBSC mobilization compared with Neupogen among allo-HSCT donors. In donors aged 35 years or younger, a slightly lower PBSC product CD34+ count was noted with Nivestym compared with Neupogen.

Scoping Review of Factors Associated with Stem Cell Mobilization and Collection in Allogeneic Stem Cell Donors.

There is wide interindividual variation in the efficacy of CD34+ cell mobilization and collection in healthy allogenic hematopoietic stem cell donors. Donor characteristics, blood cell counts, and various factors related to mobilization and collection have been associated with blood CD34+ cell count and CD34+ cell yield after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization and collection. Given the heterogenous nature of the literature reporting these associations, in this scoping review we clarify the determinants of CD34+ count and yield. Studies published between 2000 and 2023 reporting allogeneic donors undergoing G-CSF mobilization and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection were evaluated. Eligible studies were those that assessed blood CD34+ cell count or CD34+ cell yield in the first PBSC collection after mobilization with 4 or 5 days of G-CSF treatment. Associations were recorded between these outcomes and donor factors (age, sex, weight, ethnicity), mobilization factors (G-CSF scheduling or dose), collection factors (venous access, processed blood volume [PBV]) or laboratory factors (blood cell counts at baseline or after mobilization). The 52 studies evaluated between 15 and 20,884 donors. Forty-three studies were retrospective, 33 assessed blood CD34+ cell counts, and 39 assessed CD34+ cell yield from PBSCs. Blood CD34+ cell counts consistently predicted CD34+ cell yield. Younger donors usually had higher blood CD34+ cell counts and CD34+ cell yield. Most studies that investigated the effect of donor ancestry found that donors of non-European ancestry had higher blood CD34+ cell counts after mobilization and higher CD34+ cell yields from collection. The poor consensus about the best predictors of blood CD34+ cell count and yield necessitates further prospective studies, particularly of the role of donor ancestry. The current focus on donor sex as a major predictor requires re-evaluation.

Personalized autologous stem cell harvesting improves patient collection outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to demonstrate that utilizing a personalized approach to apheresis stem cell collection, can safely optimize the collection outcomes, especially in the context of poor mobilizers and high cell targets. BACKGROUND: The optimal mobilization and harvesting of peripheral blood stem cells is critical to the success of the stem cell transplant. The ideal strategy that promotes better cell yields, with sustainable use of resources and assuring patient safety, should be pursued. METHODS: PBSC collections for autologous stem cell transplant data according to a fixed-processed volume strategy (One Size Fits All) or individualized to patients CD34+ peripheral blood content and target approach (Custom-Tailored or CT) were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: A total of 263 collections from 142 patients were assessed. The majority of patients were male, had multiple myeloma and were mobilized with isolated G-CSF. The CT strategy promoted a significantly higher CD34+ cell yield when the pre-collection CD34 was lower than 20/µl (1.02 ± 0.16 versus 1.36 ± 0.23, p < 0.001) and also a decrease in the proportion of mobilization cycles that needed 3 apheresis (31% versus 14%, p = 0.02). There was no difference in apheresis-related adverse events between the groups. CONCLUSION: Tailoring the apheresis procedures to the patient-specific characteristics and objectives, can effectively promote better patient outcome.

[Usefulness of web-based application for health surveys before and after peripheral blood stem cell harvest from healthy donors].

Health surveys to assess adverse events after peripheral blood stem cell harvest (PBSCH) have conventionally been conducted by phone, but phone calls are suboptimal for conducting frequent surveys. We developed a web-based application (donor app) that enables donors to inform healthcare professionals (HCPs) of their health status as an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO). In this prospective observational study, we compared the usefulness of this donor app to phone calls for conducting health surveys. App users reported ePRO daily, and patients called by HCPs reported their health status at least once a week when called. The observation period was from the first administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to the first follow-up visit after PBSCH, excluding the hospitalization period. Each group consisted of eight donors with a median age of 32 years (range: 19-58). Nine (56.3%) were female. There were eight related donors in the phone call group and four in the donor app group. During the observation period, HCPs obtained health status reports more frequently from app users than from phone call recipients (mean proportion of days with reports made during the observation period, 27.0% vs 53.5%; p<0.05). Average time spent by the HCPs for one follow-up and total follow-ups were both significantly shorter when the donor app was used. There were no differences in donor burden or satisfaction with donation. Our study suggests that use of a donor app could provide more detailed health survey data without increasing the burden on donors and HCPs.

Predictive factors for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapies: A single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the leading indication of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of mobilization failure and characterize the risk factors associated with poor mobilization (PM) of MM patients in novel therapies era. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 211 MM patients who received their first peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) mobilization at our single center. The following data were collected: age, gender, clinical stage, disease status, complete blood cell count, induction regimen, CD34+ cell count in peripheral blood (PB), and PBSC collections. RESULTS: In addition to conventional drugs, 22 (10.4%) patients received daratumumab containing induction, and 33 (15.6%) patients used plerixafor for poor mobilization (pre-apheresis PB CD34+ cells <20/µL). Failure of collection occurred in 24 (11.4%) patients and was correlated with low white blood cell (WBC), ≥3 cycles of lenalidomide treatment before mobilization, steady-state mobilization and nouse of plerixafor are associated with mobilization failure. Daratumumab-based induction treatment ≥2 courses, albumin >41 g/L before mobilization, and steady-state mobilization were risk factors for PM in subgroups of patients treated with lenalidomide for <3 courses. In addition, Hepatitis B virus infection at baseline, thalassemia and measurable residual disease positivity were recognized as predictive factors for PM in subset of chemo-mobilization patients. CONCLUSION: In addition to some well-recognized risk factors, baseline WBC count and daratumumab exposure ≥2 courses before mobilization were revealed as the predictive factors of mobilization failure, providing consultation for preemptive use of plerixafor.

A case of acute lung injury in a peripheral blood stem cell donor mobilized with pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) has been introduced for the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). However, no cases of acute lung injury (ALI) in healthy donors have been reported, and the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. We first reported a case of ALI caused by PEG-rhG-CSF in a healthy Chinese donor, characterized by hemoptysis, hypoxemia, and patchy shadows. Ultimately, hormone administration, planned PBSC collection, leukocyte debridement, and planned PBSC collection resulted in active control of the donor's ALI. The donor's symptoms improved without any adverse effects, and the PBSC collection proceeded without incident. Over time, the lung lesion was gradually absorbed and eventually returned to normal. PEG-rhG-CSF may contribute to ALI in healthy donors via mechanisms involving neutrophil aggregation, adhesion, and the release of inflammatory mediators in the lung. This case report examines the clinical manifestations, treatment, and mechanism of lung injury induced by PEG-rhG-CSF-mobilized PBSCs.

Is an earlier strategy for harvesting peripheral blood stem cells in healthy allogeneic donors feasible?

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) mobilization with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for healthy donors is generally performed at 5th day. However, earlier collection is sometimes feasible, raising the question of whether to initiate apheresis early to limit further G-CSF exposure, while considering the risk of mobilization failure. In the current study, we examined the factors predicting successful 4th day collection and developed a model that can be used practically. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was carried out by obtaining the data of PBSC mobilizations performed between January 2009 and September 2022 in our transplantation center. RESULTS: A total of 141 healthy donors with a median donor age of 32 (18-64) were included. Adequate mobilization was achieved in 115 (81.6 %) patients. Median peripheral CD34 + cell count was 69.4/µL in the adequate mobilization group and 46/µL in the mobilization failure group (p < 0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that donor/recipient weight ratio and the 4th day peripheral CD34 + cell count≥ 50/µL were independent markers for 4th day collection success. A predictive model of our center including these parameters was available with 0.765 sensitivity and 0.968 specificity [(AUC):0.948 (95 % CI, 0.90-0.99), p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: The result of the current study shows that peripheral 4th day collection can be performed in selected donors, taking into account peripheral CD34+ cell count and donor/recipient weight ratio. In addition, using these indicators, new predictive models can be created that may assist clinicians in daily practice.

Peripheral blood stem cell harvesting in young children weighing less than 15 kg.

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation is crucial in pediatric cancer treatment, and tandem transplantation is beneficial in certain malignancies. Collecting PBSCs in small children with low body weight is challenging. We retrospectively analyzed data of pediatric cancer patients weighing <15 kg who underwent autologous PBSC harvesting in our hospital. Collections were performed in the pediatric intensive care unit over 2 or 3 consecutive days, to harvest sufficient stem cells (goal ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg per apheresate). From April 2006 to August 2021, we performed 129 collections after 50 mobilizations in 40 patients, with a median age of 1.9 (range, 0.6-5.6) years and a body weight of 11.0 (range, 6.6-14.7) kg. The median CD34+ cells in each apheresate were 4.2 (range, 0.01-40.13) × 106/kg. 78% and 56% of mobilizations achieved sufficient cell dose for single or tandem transplantation, respectively, without additional aliquoting. The preapheresis hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) count was highly correlated with the CD34+ cell yield in the apheresate (r = 0.555, P < 0.001). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone was not effective for mobilization in children ≥2 years of age, even without radiation exposure. By combining the preapheresis HPC count ≥20/µL and the 3 significant host factors, including age <2 years, no radiation exposure and use of chemotherapy, the prediction rate of goal achievement was increased (area under the curve 0.787).

Long-term outcomes of peripheral blood stem cell unrelated donors mobilized with filgrastim.

ABSTRACT: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a life-saving procedure used to treat a variety of devastating diseases. It requires hematopoietic stem cells collected via filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) or bone marrow (BM) harvest from volunteer unrelated donors (URDs). There is a paucity of safety data regarding donors' long-term adverse events. This prospective, observational study combined PBSC donors enrolled in the NMDP Investigational New Drug trial and BM donors between 1 July 1999 and 30 September 2015. The primary objective was to describe the long-term incidence of myeloid malignancies. The secondary objectives included describing the long-term incidence of lymphoid malignancies, nonhematologic malignancies, autoimmune disorders, and thrombotic events. A total of 21 643 donors (14 530 PBSCs and 7123 BM) were included. The incidence rate of myeloid disorders per 100 000 person-years in donors of PBSCs was 2.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-7.84) and in donors of BM, it was 4.13 (95% CI, 1.33-12.8). The incidence rate ratio of PBSCs/BM donors was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.12-3.03; P = .55). The incidence of other malignancies, autoimmunity, and thrombosis did not differ between the donor types. This comprehensive study of the long-term effects of filgrastim in URDs of PBSCs provides strong evidence that donors who receive filgrastim are not at an increased risk of these events compared with BM donors. It also provides reassurance to current donors undergoing stem cell mobilization as well as individuals considering joining stem cell registries, such as NMDP.

Allogeneic transplantation of bone marrow versus peripheral blood stem cells from HLA-identical sibling donors for hematological malignancies in 6064 adults from 2003 to 2020: different impacts on survival according to time period.

BACKGROUND: Mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have been widely used instead of bone marrow (BM) as the graft source for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Although early studies demonstrated no significant differences in survival between PBSC transplantation (PBSCT) and BM transplantation (BMT) from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling donors to adults with hematological malignancies, recent results have been unclear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective study was to compare overall survival (OS), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), hematopoietic recovery and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) between PBSCT and BMT according to the time period of HCT (2003-2008, 2009-2014, or 2015-2020). STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively compared the outcomes after PBSCT versus BMT in 6064 adults with hematological malignancies using a Japanese registry database between 2003 and 2020. RESULTS: The adjusted probability of OS was significantly higher in BMT recipients compared to PBSCT recipients during the early period of 2003-2008 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.91; P < 0.001) and the middle period of 2009-2014 (adjusted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.91; P < 0.001). However, during the late period of 2015-2020, the adjusted probability of OS was comparable between BMT and PBSCT recipients (adjusted HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79-1.13; P = 0.564), which were mainly due to the reduction of NRM. There was no significant difference in the relapse rate between the groups, irrespective of the time period. Compared to BMT, PBSCT led to faster neutrophil and platelet recovery and the cumulative incidences of grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute and overall and extensive chronic GVHD were significantly higher in PBSCT recipients, irrespective of the time period. CONCLUSIONS: PBSCT and BMT had similar survival outcomes and relapse rates in adult patients with hematological malignancies during the late time period of 2015-2020 despite the hematopoietic recovery and acute and chronic GVHD being higher in PBSCT recipients in all time periods.

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and apheresis in pediatric patients with cancer: A single-center report of 64 procedures.

BACKGROUND: The published experience concerning autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection in children is very limited. METHODS: The data of pediatric patients who underwent autologous stem cell mobilization and apheresis between January 2011 and April 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: We studied retrospectively 64 mobilization and apheresis procedures in 48 pediatric patients (34 males, 14 females), mean age of 7.31 ± 5.38 (range, 1.5-19.7) years, the underlying disease was mostly neuroblastoma (NBL). The body weight of 21 patients (43.75%) was 15 kg or less. The targeted autologous peripheral stem cell apheresis (APSCA) was successfully achieved in 98% of patients. Neuroblastoma patients were younger than the rest of the patients and underwent apheresis after receiving fewer chemotherapy cycles than others and all of them mobilized within the first session successfully. Plerixafor was added to mobilization in nine heavily pretreated patients (18.7%), median two doses (range, 1-4 doses). 11 patients (22.9%) underwent radiotherapy (RT) before mobilization with doses of median 24 Gy (range, 10.8-54.0 Gy). Patients with RT were older at the time of apheresis and had received more chemotherapy courses than patients without RT. As a result, patients with a history of RT had significantly lower peripheral CD34+ cells and CD34+ yields than those without RT. In 17 patients (35.4%), 22 different complications were noted. The most common complications were catheter-related infections (n:10, 20.8%), followed by catheter-related thrombosis in eight patients (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had far less therapy before apheresis were more likely to mobilize successfully. Our study provides a detailed practice approach including complications during APSCA aiming to increase the success rates of apheresis in transplantation centers.

Pain is what hurts: An exploration of perception and management of pain in peripheral blood stem cell donors.

BACKGROUND: Pain is a side effect of Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) administration. This prospective study investigates various aspects including pain perception occurring in Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Related and unrelated PBSC donors were prospectively studied. Donors recorded pain symptoms during the four-day period of G-CSF administration using the McGill Pain Questionnaire, a Visual Analog Scale and a pain diary. RESULTS: There were 208 donors included, 102 (49%) related and 106 (51%) unrelated donors. Ninety-two percent of all reported the occurrence of pain. Moderate or severe pain was reported by 52%. No differences were found between related and unrelated donors. Pain occurred more often in females (p = 0.035). Relatively young donors (age 16-30 years) more frequently showed to have pain in comparison to older donors (>50 years) (p = 0.006). Musculoskeletal pain was most frequently distributed in the gluteal and lower back region (65-71%). Irrespective of the pain location, pain was most often described as nagging, annoying, however tolerable. Donors experiencing pain most on days of G-CSF administration, most frequently occurring during relaxation or at night. Sleep-mode was often affected. The use of paracetamol (acetaminophen) was sufficient for all but one donor. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to describe different aspects of pain associated with G-CSF administration in donors. Although the observed pain was tolerable, it should never be neglected. Knowledge derived from this study is of use for staff members involved in donor information and care management.

[Research Progress on the Application Strategies of Plerixafor in the Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization for Autologous Transplantation--Review].

Plerixafor, an analog of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), which allows the release of stem cells from the bone marrow into peripheral blood (PB) by disrupting the interaction of CXCR4 with stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), is effective in mobilization for peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Due to its market approval has not been long and its high price in China, the clinical application of plerixafor is still very limited. The clinicians are actively seeking the optimal use of plerixafor to improve the success rate of PBSC collection and reduce the cost. This article reviews the latest research progress related to plerixafor application, in order to summarize the optimal use of plerixafor in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT).