Symptomatic androgen deficiency and sexual dysfunctions in male patients receiving alectinib for ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: It is reported that treatment with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) induces hypogonadism both in male patients with ALK-positive cancer and in murine models. METHODS: In this study, three groups, including an experimental group of male patients with ALK-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (ANSCLC) who were receiving alectinib (cohort A), a control group of female patients with ALK-positive ANSCLC who were receiving alectinib (cohort B), and a control group of male patients with ALK-negative ANSCLC (cohort C), prospectively underwent a full hormone assessment for androgen deficiency at 8 weeks after the start of treatment and in case of reported suspected symptoms. Patients with major sexual dysfunctions were referred to an endocrinologist. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were consecutively enrolled onto the study. Among sixty-eight male patients, both median total testosterone levels (2.93 vs. 4.92 ng/ml; p = .0001) and free testosterone levels (0.11 vs. 0.17 pg/ml; p = .0002) were significantly lower in ALK-positive ANSCLC patients in cohort A compared with ALK-negative patients in cohort C; conversely, median FSH (10.32 vs. 17.52 mUI/ml; p = .0059) and LH levels (4.72 vs. 7.49 mUI/ml; p = .0131) were significantly higher in cohort C compared to cohort A. Median inhibin B levels were higher in ALK-positive male patients (74.3 vs. 44.24 pg/ml; p = .0038), but all patients had inhibin B values within the normal range. The percentage of male patients who had positive scores on the Androgen Deficiency in Aging Males (ADAM) questionnaire was 62% in cohort A and 26.8% in cohort C, including eight patients who reported at least one major symptom and were referred to Andrology Unit. No significant differences in the endocrine assessment were reported between cohorts A and B. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of androgen deficiency should be tracked in male patients with ALK-positive ANSCLC who are receiving alectinib, and testosterone replacement should be considered, as appropriate.

The use of microtracers in food-effect trials: An alternative study design for toxic drugs with long half-lives exemplified by the case for alectinib.

The traditional design of food-effect studies has a high patient burden for toxic drugs with long half-lives (e.g., anticancer agents). Microtracers could be used to assess food-effect in patients without influencing their ongoing treatment. The feasibility of a microtracer food-effect study during steady-state of the therapeutic drug was investigated in an in silico simulation study with alectinib as an example for a relative toxic drug with a long half-life. Microtracer pharmacokinetics were simulated based on a previously published population pharmacokinetic model and used for estimation of a model with and a model without food as a covariate on oral bioavailability of alectinib (assuming a 40% food-effect). Power was defined as the fraction of clinical trials where a significant (p < 0.01) food-effect was identified. The proposed study design of 10 patients on steady-state treatment, 10 blood samples collected within 24 h after administration and an assumed food-effect of 40% had a power of 99.9%. The mean estimated food-effect was 39.8% (80% confidence interval: 31.0%-48.6%). The feasibility of microtracer food-effect studies was demonstrated. The design of the microtracer food-effect study allowed estimation of the food-effect with minimal influence on therapeutic treatment and reducing patient burden compared to the traditional study design for toxic drugs with long half-lives.

Safety and efficacy of alectinib versus crizotinib in alk-positive non-small cell lung cancer: An update meta-analysis.

Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of alectinib compared with crizotinib and provide a reference for clinical use of ALK-TKI, systematically. We searched articles published update till October, 2021 based on the electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. All trials analyzed the summary odds ratios (ORs) of the interesting outcomes. Three RCTs, including six studies were included. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) =0.33 (95%CI=0.21-0.51, P<0.00001) shown that the alectinib group achieved significant progress-free survival (PFS) superiority than crizotinib, consistent with those for the with (P=0.001) or without (P<0.00001) measurable CNS lesions at baseline. Also, the regimen of the alectinib did achieved benefit in the ORR (OR=2.07, 95% CI=1.41-3.06, P=0.0002) than crizotinib. Due to the limited data, the pool result of the difference of overall survival (OS) was without statistically significant (P=0.35). With regard to the safety, grade 3 to 5 adverse events were less frequent with alectinib than crizotinib (OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.31-0.90, P=0.02). As compared with crizotinib, alectinib demonstrated better PFS efficacy and comparable safety as a first-line treatment for advanced ALK-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). OS data remain immature, further trials with long-term survival rate have future to look forward to.

An update on Alectinib: a first line treatment for ALK-positive advanced lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Alectinib is a second-generation, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for the treatment of ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is able to induce significant and durable CNS responses. However, long-term use of alectinib has been clinically reported to cause some serious and even life-threatening adverse events. There are currently no effective interventions for its adverse events, and this undoubtedly leads to delays in patient treatment and limits its long-term clinical use. AREAS COVERED: Based on the clinical trials conducted so far, we summarize the efficacy and adverse events that occurred, especially those related to cardiovascular disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, hepatobiliary disorders, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, and respiratory disorders. The factors that may influence alectinib selection are also described. Findings are based on a PubMed literature search of clinical and basic science research papers spanning 1998-2023. EXPERT OPINION: The significant prolongation of patient survival compared with first-generation ALK inhibitor suggests its potential as a first-line treatment for the NSCLC, but the severe adverse events of alectinib limit its long-term clinical use. Future research should focus on the exact mechanisms of these toxicities, how to alleviate the adverse events caused by alectinib clinically, and the development of next-generation drugs with reduced toxicities.

The safety and efficacy for the treatment of alectinib in a women with ALK-positive lung cancer delivered a healthy male neonate throughout Pregnancy: A case report.

The incidence of lung cancer in pregnancy is increasing because of an increase in cigarette smoking among young women, air pollution, and advanced maternal age. This is the third case report of a woman with metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung adenocarcinoma treated with alectinib during pregnancy. The patient was diagnosed with lung cancer at 26 weeks' gestation. Her condition rapidly progressed to disseminated intravascular coagulation accompanied by hypoxemia. After 5 days of treatment with alectinib 600 mg twice daily and best supportive care, the patient's symptoms quickly resolved. She delivered a healthy male newborn at 39 weeks' gestation. At birth, the alectinib concentration was 4.3 times higher in maternal plasma than that in newborn plasma (299.0 vs 69.2 ng/mL). The concentrations of alectinib in the amniotic fluid and the placenta were 27.3 ng/mL and 1136.25 ng/g, respectively. The alectinib concentration in the maternal milk (152 ng/mL) indicated that this drug could be excreted through the breast milk. At 12 months after the diagnosis, the mother had recovered well, and no developmental anomalies were observed in the infant.

Analysis of Serious Weight Gain in Patients Using Alectinib for ALK-Positive Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Alectinib is a standard-of-care treatment for metastatic ALK+ NSCLC. Weight gain is an unexplored side effect reported in approximately 10%. To prevent or intervene alectinib-induced weight gain, more insight in its extent and etiology is needed. METHODS: Change in body composition was analyzed in a prospective series of 46 patients with ALK+ NSCLC, treated with alectinib. Waist circumference, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and skeletal muscle were quantified using sliceOmatic software on computed tomography images at baseline, 3 months (3M), and 1 year (1Y). To investigate an exposure-toxicity relationship, alectinib plasma concentrations were quantified. Four patients with more than 10 kg weight gain were referred to Erasmus MC Obesity Center CGG for in-depth analysis (e.g., assessments of appetite, dietary habits, other lifestyle, medical and psychosocial factors, and extensive metabolic and endocrine assessments, including resting energy expenditure). RESULTS: Mean increase in waist circumference was 9 cm (9.7%, p < 0.001) in 1Y with a 40% increase in abdominal obesity (p = 0.014). VAT increased to 10.8 cm2 (15.0%, p = 0.003) in 3M and 35.7 cm2 (39.0%, p < 0.001) in 1Y. SAT increased to 18.8 cm2 (12.4%, p < 0.001) in 3M and 45.4 cm2 (33.3%, p < 0.001) in 1Y. The incidence of sarcopenic obesity increased from 23.7% to 47.4% during 1Y of treatment. Baseline waist circumference was a positive predictor of increase in VAT (p = 0.037). No exposure-toxicity relationship was found. In-depth analysis (n = 4) revealed increased appetite in two patients and metabolic syndrome in all four patients. CONCLUSIONS: Alectinib may cause relevant increased sarcopenic abdominal obesity, with increases of both VAT and SAT, quickly after initiation. This may lead to many serious metabolic, physical, and mental disturbances in long-surviving patients.

The percentage of ALK-positive cells and the efficacy of first-line alectinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: is it a novel factor for stratification? (Turkish Oncology Group Study).

INTRODUCTION: Alectinib is an effective second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) used in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Recent studies demonstrated that the percentage of ALK-positive tumor cells in patient groups receiving crizotinib might affect outcomes. This study aimed to investigate whether the percentage of ALK-positive cells had a predictive effect in patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line Alectinib as ALK-TKI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with advanced-stage NSCLC who received alectinib as a first-line ALK-TKI and whose percentage of ALK-positive cells was determined by FISH at 27 different centers. Patients who received any ALK-TKI before alectinib were not included in the study. Patients were separated into two groups according to the median (40%) value of the percentage of ALK-positive cells (high-positive group ≥ 40% and low-positive group < 40%). The primary endpoint was PFS, and the secondary endpoints were OS, ORR, and PFS of the subgroups based on different threshold values for the percentage of ALK-positive cells. RESULTS: 211 patients were enrolled (48.3% female, 51.7% male) to study. 37% (n = 78) of the patients had received chemotherapy previously. After a median of 19.4 months of follow-up, the median PFS was not reached in the high-positive group (n = 113), but it was 10.8 months in the low-positive group (n = 98) (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.25-0.60, p < 0.001). The median OS in the high-positive group was not reached, whereas it was 22.8 months in the low-positive group (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.22-0.63, p < 0.001). ORR was significantly higher in the high-positive group (87.2 vs. 68.5%; p = 0.002). According to the cut-off values of < 20%, 20-39%, 40-59%, and ≥ 60%, the median PFS was 4.5, 17.1, and 26 months, respectively, and could not be reached in the ≥ 60% group. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the efficacy of alectinib varies significantly across patient subgroups with different percentages of ALK-positive cells. If these findings are prospectively validated, the percentage of ALK-positive cells may be used as a stratification factor in randomized trials comparing different ALK-TKIs.

Alectinib for the treatment of pretreated RET-rearranged advanced NSCLC: Results of the ETOP ALERT-lung trial.

BACKGROUND: Alectinib, a highly selective next generation ALK-inhibitor, has exhibited potent anti-tumour activity in RET-rearranged NSCLC in the preclinical stage. METHODS: ALERT-lung is a single-arm, phase II trial evaluating the activity of alectinib for the treatment of pretreated RET-rearranged advanced NSCLC. Alectinib was administered orally, 600 mg, twice per day until progression, refusal or unacceptable toxicity (treatment could continue beyond progression, if patient was deriving clinical benefit). Patient recruitment closed prematurely due to discouraging results for alectinib in a phase I/II study in the same indication. RESULTS: All 14 patients who enrolled until the premature accrual closure, received at lease one dose of alectinib. Among them, median age was 61 years, majority (71 %) was female, never smokers, of ECOG PS 1. No objective response (complete or partial response) was recorded. Of the 13 evaluable patients, three (23 %) achieved and maintained disease stabilisation for 24 weeks. Up to 31 March 2021 (median follow-up 15.9 months), 12 PFS-events (92 %) were observed, with median PFS of 3.7 months (95 % C.I.: 1.8 - 7.3 months). Overall, three deaths (23 %) were reported. Seven patients (50 %) experienced grade ≥ 3 adverse events, while three discontinued treatment due to erythema multiforme of grade 3, related to alectinib. No treatment-related serious adverse event was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Accrual into our trial was terminated early in response to other reports of limited activity of alectinib in patients with RET-fusion NSCLC and the emergence of more potent selective RET-inhibitors. Also in our trial, alectinib did not show the expected potential for anti-tumour activity in NSCLC.

Alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer and comparison of next-generation TKIs after crizotinib failure: Real-world evidence.

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion is a prognostic indicator for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The real-world data of ALK TKIs remain a major concern. METHODS: Patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC, who received crizotinib or alectinib treatment in first line, were retrospectively reviewed. ALK status was detected using immunohistochemistry (IHC) or next-generation sequencing (NGS). Clinical outcomes have been comprehensively analyzed between TKIs, ALK fusions, EML4-ALK variants, and next-generation TKIs after crizotinib failure. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight patients were successively enrolled (crizotinib, n = 109; alctinib, n = 59). Alectinib showed consistent superiority in progressive-free survival (PFS) over crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.43, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 0.24-0.77, p = 0.004). Multivariate Cox regression showed chemotherapy (CT) prior to TKIs or synchronous chemotherapy seemed not to improve PFS compared to ALK inhibitors alone (p > 0.05). And, alectinib was superior to crizotinib in prolonging intracranial PFS (HR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.03-0.49, p = 0.003). Patients in EML4 group had a better prognosis than those in non-EML4 group after alectinib administration (HR 0.13, 95% CI: 0.03-0.60, p = 0.009). TP53 co-mutations were relatively common (34.0%) and associated with adverse outcome in ALK-positive patients (adjusted HR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.00-4.92, p = 0.049). After crizotinib failure, 33 patients received a sequential application of next-generation ALK TKIs. Compared to ceritinib and brigatinib, alectinib might have better PFS (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Our results revealed alectinib had better PFS and higher intracranial efficacy compared to crizotinib in ALK-positive NSCLC, and might improve PFS by comparison with ceritinib and brigatinib after crizotinib failure.

Evaluation of Lung Toxicity Related to the Treatment With Alectinib Using a Pharmacovigilance Database.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor alectinib is recommended as a first-line treatment for ALK lung cancer. Interstitial lung disease is the most common adverse event leading to discontinuation of alectinib. The purpose of this study was to use the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database for the evaluation of incidence trends and timing of alectinib toxicity in the lungs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by alectinib were extracted between April 2004 and March 2021. Data related to lung toxicity ADRs were analyzed, and the relative risk was estimated using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The time of onset of the lung toxicity signs was noted. RESULTS: We obtained 524 reports of ADRs associated with alectinib. Of these, 157 were lung toxicity, including interstitial lung disease, lung disorder, pneumonitis, and pulmonary edema. The RORs for these signs were 10.28 (95%CI=8.38-12.60), 9.19 (5.58-15.13), 7.40 (3.67-14.88), and 7.01 (3.13-15.69), respectively. The median onset times (quartiles, 25-75%) of interstitial lung disease, lung disorder, pneumonitis, and pulmonary edema associated with alectinib treatment were 92 (36-195), 57 (51-129), 228 (62-431), and 83 (22-96) days, respectively. CONCLUSION: Among the lung toxicity signs, interstitial lung disease had the highest ROR, suggesting a strong causal relationship with alectinib treatment. Interstitial lung disease most frequently developed within 60 days after the start of treatment. These results will be useful for monitoring adverse events associated with the use of alectinib.

[Expert consensus on ensartinib in the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer].

The mutation rate of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer is 3% to 7%. Due to its low mutation rate and better long-term survival compared with epidermal growth factor receptor-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients, therefore, it's called "diamond mutation". At present, there are three generations of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) drugs in the world. The first-generation ALK-TKI drug approved in China is crizotinib, and the second-generation drugs are alectinib, ceritinib and ensartinib. Among them, ensartinib is an ALK-TKI domestically developed, and its efficacy is similar to that of alectinib. The main adverse event is transient rash, and compliance to ensartinib is better from the perspective of long-term survival of patients. The manifestation of rash caused by ensartinib is different from that of other ALK-TKI drugs. In order to facilitate clinical application and provide patients with more treatment options, under the guidance of the Committee of Cancer Rehabilitation and Palliative Care of China Anti-Cancer Association, this article collects and summarizes the common adverse reactions of ensartinib. Based on the clinical practice, a clear adverse classification and specific treatment plan are formulated, in order to provide a corresponding reference for clinicians to make more comprehensive clinical decisions.

Chiglitazar: First Approval.

Chiglitazar (Bilessglu®) is an orally administered, non-thiazolidinedione small-molecule agonist of α, δ and γ peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) being developed by Chipscreen Biosciences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. In October 2021, chiglitazar was approved in China for use as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycaemic control in adult patients with T2D. The drug is also in phase 2 clinical development in China for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of chiglitazar leading to this first approval for the treatment of T2D.

Perspective on the Role of Four Beta-blockers in Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: The current recommendations of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association and a previous Bayesian analysis clearly show a mortality benefit with the use of ß- blockers in chronic HF, especially for bisoprolol, carvedilol, and sustained-release metoprolol succinate. OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to report the evidence on the use of the afore-mentioned ß-blockers in subjects with heart failure and to characterize the stages of heart failure in response to the four different ß-blockers. Furthermore, it shed light on the patient's satisfaction and improved quality of life using the afore-mentioned ß-blockers in subjects with heart failure. METHODS: The current perspective presented the clinical outcomes, including hospitalization, morbidity, mortality, patient's satisfaction, and quality of life, of four beta (ß)-blockers, namely bisoprolol, carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, and nebivolol in different stages of heart failure. RESULTS: The use of these three agents should be recommended for all stable subjects with current or previous symptoms of heart failure and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction unless there is any contraindication. The fore-mentioned ß-blockers (bisoprolol, carvedilol, and metoprolol succinate) can be initiated early, even in stable and symptom-free (at rest) subjects with heart failure. ß-blockers in heart failure should be commenced at small doses and then titrated upward as tolerated to achieve the desired clinical effects on heart rate and symptom control. CONCLUSION: Cardiologists should weigh the benefit-risk in subjects with heart failure and other coexisting cardiovascular problems such as atrial fibrillation and diabetes.

Ultrasonographic assessment of renal perfusion in bitches with mammary carcinoma treated with long-term carprofen.

The aim of this study was to evaluate renal hemodynamics, routine clinical and laboratory parameters used to estimate renal function, and clinical evolution during six months in bitches with mammary carcinomas that underwent mastectomy and were treated (TG) or not (CG) with carprofen for three months after surgery. Twenty-six bitches with mammary carcinoma were equally distributed into TG that received carprofen 4.4 mg/kg/day for 90 days and CG that did not receive anti-inflammatory medication. Renal artery Doppler flowmetry, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of renal parenchyma, haematological, biochemical and clinical analyses were obtained once a month. These data were compared between groups and time via analysis of variance (ANOVA) in a completely randomized design with repeated measures (P < 0.05). On B-mode ultrasound, the area of the renal artery was greater (P = 0.0003) in the TG. Regarding laboratory findings, haematocrit and haemoglobin were similar in both groups, showing a significant and gradual increase after three months of treatment; MCV, MHC, and MCHC were increased (P < 0.05) and lymphocyte and band counts decreased (P < 0.05) in the TG. Regarding biochemical tests, ALT was the only parameter with a significant difference, being higher (P = 0.0272) in the treated group. It can be concluded that the use of carprofen for 90 days causes minimal changes in renal perfusion, erythrocyte parameters and ALT activity, and reduces the proportion of blood inflammatory cells. Therefore, use of this medication can be carried out safely in patients who require auxiliary cancer treatment.

Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK-rearranged: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Whereas there are many pharmacological interventions prescribed for patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), comparative data between novel generation ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain scant. Here, we indirectly compared the efficacy and safety of first-line systemic therapeutic options used for the treatment of ALK-rearranged NSCLC. METHODS: We included all phase 2 and 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any two or three treatment options. Eligible studies reported at least one of the following outcomes: progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), or adverse events of grade 3 or higher (Grade ≥ 3 AEs). Subgroup analysis was conducted according to central nervous system (CNS) metastases. RESULTS: A total of 9 RCTs consisting of 2484 patients with 8 treatment options were included in the systematic review. Our analysis showed that alectinib (300 mg and 600 mg), brigatinib, lorlatinib and ensartinib yielded the most favorable PFS. Whereas there was no significant OS or ORR difference among the ALK-TKIs. According to Bayesian ranking profiles, lorlatinib, alectinib 600 mg and alectinib 300 mg had the best PFS (63.7%), OS (35.9%) and ORR (37%), respectively. On the other hand, ceritinib showed the highest rate of severe adverse events (60%). CONCLUSION: Our analysis indicated that alectinib and lorlatinib might be associated with the best therapeutic efficacy in first-line treatment for major population of advanced NSCLC patients with ALK-rearrangement. However, since there is little comparative evidence on the treatment options, there is need for relative trials to fully determine the best treatment options as well as the rapidly evolving treatment landscape.