RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Frontline neurointensive care nurses from 1 community hospital were invited to assess the current state of care related to use of external ventricular drains (EVDs) and intrahospital transport (IHT) policies, investigate and plan practice changes, and implement skills review for nurses caring for the adult patient with an acute brain injury. PROJECT: Our team researched best practices related to EVD care and IHT procedures, updated current EVD insertion checklists, developed nurse role cards to assist with EVD insertion at the bedside, revised current EVD care policies and procedures, and created a new IHT policy. The same nurses shared updated information and skills review for neuroscience nurse peers. CONCLUSION: The goals for the project were met, and practice variation is being reduced.
Asunto(s)
Drenaje/métodos , Hidrocefalia/terapia , Transferencia de Pacientes/métodos , Ventriculostomía/métodos , Adulto , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Drenaje/instrumentación , Femenino , Hospitales Comunitarios/organización & administración , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Transferencia de Pacientes/tendencias , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Ventriculostomía/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
Patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (ATCSCI) have an increased risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). The effectiveness of silver alloy-coated silicone urinary catheters (SACC) in preventing CAUTI in ATCSCI is unknown and was the objective of this study. We performed a quality improvement initiative in an attempt to reduce CAUTI in patients undergoing spine surgery at a single quaternary center. Prior to July 2015, all patients received a latex indwelling catheter (LIC). All patients with ATCSCI with limited hand function (AIS A,B, or C) received a SACC. Incidence of CAUTI, microbiology, duration of infection, antibiotic susceptibility, and catheter-associated adverse events were recorded prospectively. We studied 3081 consecutive patients over the three years, of whom 302 (9.8%) had ATCSCI; 63% of ATCSCI patients were ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) A or B. The overall rate of CAUTI was 19% (585/3081), and was 38% (116/302) in patients with ATCSCI. Of 178 ATCSCI patients with LIC, 100 (56%) developed a CAUTI compared with 28 of 124 (23%) patients with SACC (p < 0.05). Poly-microbial and gram-positive infection was more common in LIC than in SACC (p < 0.05). Median duration of infection was 9 days in SACC group and 12 days in LIC group (p = 0.08). Resistance to trimethoprim (p < 0.001) and ciprofloxacin (p < 0.05) were more common in LIC group. There was no difference in catheter-associated adverse events or length of stay between the groups. This quality improvement initiative illustrates the effectiveness of antiseptic silver alloy-coated silicone urinary catheters in patients with ATCSCI. In our population, the use of SACC reduces the incidence and the complexity of CAUTI.
Asunto(s)
Aleaciones/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Siliconas/normas , Plata/normas , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/terapia , Catéteres Urinarios/normas , Adulto , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/normas , Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Médula Cervical/lesiones , Diseño de Equipo/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/tendencias , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Catéteres Urinarios/efectos adversos , Catéteres Urinarios/tendencias , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & controlRESUMEN
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Left-sided internal jugular and all subclavian central venous catheters (CVCs) cause thoracic central vein occlusions (TCVOs) more often than right-sided internal jugular catheters. To enable right-sided CVC placement in patients with TCVO, an inside-out access (IOA) approach was established at 3 vascular access centers in Europe involving use of a novel IOA device advanced from the right femoral vein. In the current analysis, we assessed the eligibility and success rate of this IOA approach in a cohort of patients with TCVO requiring a tunneled dialysis catheter. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter observational study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 36 patients with TCVO treated in Vienna, Austria; Oxford, England; or Cologne, Germany, who required hemodialysis access between July 2016 and June 2018. EXPOSURE: Application of the IOA approach to gain vascular access. OUTCOME: The primary end point was the success rate of passing the TCVO to gain dialysis access using the IOA approach. Secondary end points were catheter patency at 3 months and procedure-related complications (early infections, bleeding, hematoma, and pericardial effusions). ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Descriptive statistics to characterize eligibility, success rate, and complications of the IOA approach. RESULTS: 36 patients with TCVO and history of multiple CVCs and arteriovenous fistulas were referred to the participating centers for vascular access. 32 (89%) patients were eligible for the IOA approach. 39 treatments were performed, with 7 patients undergoing the IOA procedure a second time more than 3 months after initial CVC placement. Dialysis access was established successfully in 38 of 39 (97%) implementations of the IOA procedure. Median intervention time was 43 minutes. No complications occurred. LIMITATIONS: No comparison to other methods to place CVCs and the observational study design. CONCLUSIONS: The IOA approach is a promising method to enable rapid access to the right jugular vein in the setting of pre-existing TCVO. Additional experience is needed to understand the generalizability of these observations.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Venas Yugulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo Venoso Central/tendencias , Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Venas Yugulares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Renal/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The risk of infectious and noninfectious complications associated with long peripheral catheters (LPCs) is unknown. In this retrospective study of 539 catheters, we found LPCs were often placed for the indications of difficult access and long-term antibiotics. Rates of deep vein thrombosis (1.7%) and catheter-related infection (0.6%) were low. LPCs may represent a novel and safe option for short-term venous access.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/terapia , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Cateterismo Periférico/tendencias , Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico , Trombosis de la Vena/terapiaRESUMEN
A perineural catheter with a continuous infusion of local anesthetic is an excellent option for postoperative analgesia; however, its limitations include limited duration of action (i.e., 3-7 days) as well as a risk of infection and dislodgement. Furthermore, these blocks may cause dense sensory and motor blockades that under certain circumstances may not be ideal. There is novel evidence that ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (pPNS) may serve as an alternative approach free of the limitations associated with peripheral nerve blocks. In this review, we discuss the evidence for pPNS on postoperative acute pain management. Subsequently, we briefly discuss additional alternatives to continuous peripheral nerve blocks, including cryoanalgesia and liposomal bupivacaine.
Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Nervios Periféricos/diagnóstico por imagen , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Analgesia/métodos , Analgesia/tendencias , Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Humanos , Nervios Periféricos/efectos de los fármacos , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/tendencias , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Successful vascular access (VA) cannulation is integral to the delivery of adequate dialysis, highlighting the importance of ensuring the viability of arteriovenous access in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Missed VA cannulation can lead to infection, infiltration, hematoma or aneurysm formation resulting in the need for access revision, central venous catheter (CVC) placement, or permanent loss of VA. Cannulation-related complications can also negatively impact on a patient's dialysis experience and quality of life. This study aimed to identify patient, VA and nurse factors associated with unsuccessful VA cannulations. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in HD patients with a permanent VA from three HD units. Data on patient, VA and nurse characteristics, plus, cannulation technique were collected for each episode of cannulation. General Estimating Equation was used to fit a repeated measures logistic regression to determine the odds of cannulation success. RESULTS: We collected data on 1946 episodes of cannulation (83.9% fistula) in 149 patients by 63 nurses. Cannulation included use of tourniquet (62.9%), ultrasound (4.1%) and was by rope ladder (73.8%) or area (24.7%) technique. The miscannulation rate was 4.4% (n = 85) with a third of patients (n = 47) having at least one episode of miscannulation. Extravasation (n = 17, 0.9%) and use of an existing CVC (n = 6, 0.6%) were rare. Multivariable characteristics of successful cannulation included fistula compared with graft [OR 4.38; 95%CI, 1.89-10.1]; older access [OR 1.68; 95%CI, 1.32-2.14]; absence of stent [OR 3.37; 95%CI, 1.39-8.19]; no ultrasound [OR 13.7; 95%CI, 6.52-28.6]; no tourniquet [OR 2.32; 95%CI, 1.15-4.66]; and lack of post graduate certificate in renal nursing [OR 2.27; 95%CI, 1.31-3.93]. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a low rate of miscannulation. Further research is required on ultrasound-guided cannulation. Identifying variables associated with successful cannulation may be used to develop a VA cannulation complexity instrument that could be utilised to match to the cannulation skill of a competency-assessed nurse, thereby minimising the risk of missed cannulation and trauma.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo/tendencias , Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal/tendencias , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Cateterismo/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/sangre , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/instrumentación , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In intrathecal drug delivery, visualization of the device has been performed with plain radiography. However, the visibility of the related structures can be problematic. In troubleshooting, after the contrast material injection via the catheter access port, a computed tomography (CT) scan has been used. In troubleshooting, we also used a non-contrast CT scan with 2D and 3D reconstructions. With the current phantom study, we aimed to obtain high-resolution imaging of a poor opaque catheter with the use of a low-dose single-energy 2D and 3D CT scan with limited radiation exposure as a substitute for plain radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The catheter was placed into a fatty substance and mounted on an anthropomorphic abdomen phantom followed by CT with varying kVp settings and with added tin beam filtering. Dose levels corrected based on the spinal catheter tip on T8 would result in a calculated effective dose in the range of the mSv's calculated for the plain x-ray examination. RESULTS: Ultimately, Sn100 kVp has the best trade-off between visibility, artifacts, and noise for a fixed dose. Although 3D VRT imaging was challenging at this low dose level, we could make a full evaluation possible with complementary 2D projections. CONCLUSIONS: We could correctly identify the catheter and related structures, which supports the investigation of this in vivo and side-by-side evaluation with plain radiography. If found superior, then this technique may be able to replace plain radiography, while providing better visualization and acceptable radiation exposure. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr. Delhaas reports personal fees from Medtronic Inc., as a previous consultant, outside the submitted work; Prof. van der Lugt reports grants from GE Healthcare, Siemens, Stryker, Medtronic, and Penumbra outside the submitted work.
Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Fantasmas de Imagen , Dosis de Radiación , Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Cateterismo/métodos , Cateterismo/tendencias , Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional/tendencias , Fantasmas de Imagen/tendencias , Proyectos Piloto , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/tendenciasRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: The Neurogenic Bladder Research Group (NBRG) registry is a multicenter prospective observational study. This manuscript is retrospective based on a cross-sectional survey. OBJECTIVES: To assess patient subjective assessment of urinary tract infection (UTI) frequency and severity are associated with the degree of use of catheters or incontinence products. SETTING: Multiple hospitals across the United States. METHODS: Eligibility included: age > 18 years and acquired SCI. Over 1.5 years, 1479 eligible participants were enrolled. We excluded those with surgical reconstruction or diversion of the bladder. In total, 1282 participants were grouped by bladder management: (1) indwelling catheter (IDC), (2) clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), (3) external devices (pads/condom), and (4) volitional voiding (Void). UTI frequency was classified as 0, 1-3, 4-6, or > 6 over the prior year. UTI severity was determined by hospitalization for UTI in the prior year. Multivariate regression compared these factors across groups. RESULTS: UTIs were least frequent in Void followed by pads/condom, CIC, and IDC (all p ≤ 0.001). UTI severity followed a similar pattern. Controlling for covariates, the adjusted odds of UTI frequency (Void = reference) were 2.28 (1.38-3.76) for pads/condom, 3.42 (2.25-5.18) for CIC, and 4.3 (2.59-6.70) for IDC (all p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patient subjective assessment of UTI frequency is highest with IDC, followed by CIC, pads/condom, and lowest with spontaneous voiding. The odds of hospitalization for UTI were three times higher for IDC than spontaneous voiding. UTI risk should be considered when counseling patients about bladder management options. These associations do not imply causation but warrant further investigation in a prospective manner. SPONSORSHIP: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Award (CER14092138).
Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Cateterismo Uretral Intermitente/tendencias , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/terapia , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología , Adulto , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Cateterismo Uretral Intermitente/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The major concern after inguinal hernioplasty is chronic postsurgical pain and impaired quality of life due to central sensitization. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pre-emptive analgesia using regional techniques may help prevent the development of central sensitization. This study evaluated the effect of regional anesthesia followed by continuous regional analgesia on postoperative pain and functional outcome following inguinal hernioplasty. METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive patients scheduled to undergo open mesh inguinal hernioplasty were randomly allocated to one of three groups: subarachnoid block alone (group SAB), general anesthesia alone (group GA), or subarachnoid block combined with a continuous transverse abdominis plane block (group TAP). Pain and functional outcome was assessed before and 6 months following the surgery using the Core Outcome Measures Index score adapted for patients with hernia (COMI-hernia). During the first 72 hours postoperatively, pain was assessed at rest and during five different activities using the numerical rating scale. RESULTS: Six months following the surgery, the COMI-hernia score was lower in group TAP than in group GA or group SAB (0.54±0.41 vs 0.88±0.43 and 1.00±0.54, respectively; p<0.02). Pain at rest (p<0.02) and during activities (p<0.001) was lowest in group TAP during the first 72 hours postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: A subarachnoid block combined with continuous postoperative analgesia via a transverse abdominis plane catheter provided better pain control and functional outcome 6 months following inguinal hernioplasty as well as better postoperative analgesia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2016/09/007238.
Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia , Dolor Crónico/prevención & control , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Músculos Abdominales/inervación , Adulto , Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Femenino , Hernia Inguinal/diagnóstico , Herniorrafia/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bloqueo Nervioso/tendencias , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/tendencias , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Recuperación de la Función/fisiología , Método Simple Ciego , Espacio Subaracnoideo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) although rare among infants presents many management challenges. We sought to evaluate factors associated with PD catheter failure among infants initiated on chronic PD. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all children under two years of age who had PD catheters placed for initiation of chronic PD from 2002 to 2015. Data was extracted for catheter related events occurring within 12 months of catheter placement. Cox and Poisson regression models were used to delineate factors associated catheter complications. RESULTS: Twenty-five infants with median age 18 days had PD catheters placed for chronic dialysis. Common complications included leakage around the exit site (31%), blockage (26%), migration or malposition (23%), catheter-related infections (18%), and other complications (2%). Predictors of initial PD catheter failure were age less than one month at catheter placement (hazard ratio (HR) 7.77, 95% CI, 1.70-35.39, p = 0.008), use of catheter within three days of placement (HR 5.67, 95% CI, 1.39-23.10, p = 0.015) and presence of a hernia (HR 8.64, 95% CI, 1.19-62.36, p = 0.033). In an adjusted Poisson regression model, PD catheter use within three days of placement was the only predictor of any catheter complication over the12 months of follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Use of PD catheters within three days of placement was associated with catheter failure. We recommend that when possible, catheters should be allowed to heal for at least three days prior to use to reduce risk of complications and improve catheter survival.
Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Peritoneal/instrumentación , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Femenino , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/diagnóstico , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/epidemiología , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/prevención & control , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Masculino , Diálisis Peritoneal/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have examined the impact of initiating an external ventricular drain (EVD) placement and handling protocol on the infection rate dating back to the early 2000s. METHODS: We report a quantitative systematic review of the published literature, described our own protocol (including a mandatory checklist), and present our single institution experience. Search terms "external ventricular drain protocol" or "external ventricular drain placement protocol" or "preventing infections in external ventricular drains" or "external ventricular drain infections" were entered into standard search engines in a systematic fashion. Articles were reviewed and graded independently for class of evidence. There were 10 relevant class IV articles and no discrepancies among article ratings (i.e., κ = 1). The published evidence was reviewed and evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant drop in rates of EVD infection after initiation of the protocol, although the overall quality of the body of evidence according to the GRADE criteria was "very poor". Preimplementation and postimplementation infection rates were collected and analyzed in combination with the results from our literature review. The EVD infection rate in our institution was 12% in the 8 months before protocol initiation (January 2015 to August 2015), and dropped to 0% in the 7 months after initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Although the quality of the literature supporting EVD placement protocols is poor, all published studies show a consistent and substantial benefit, and this effect was recapitulated in our own meta-analysis-based prospective EVD protocol experience.
Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Drenaje/tendencias , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Ventriculostomía/tendencias , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Ventriculostomía/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION:: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have determined that chronic dialysis units should have <12% of their patients utilizing central venous catheters for hemodialysis treatments. On the Eastern Shore of Maryland, the central venous catheter rates in the dialysis units averaged >45%. A multidisciplinary program was established with goals of decreasing catheter rates in order to decrease central line-associated bloodstream infections, decrease mortality associated with central line-associated bloodstream infection, decrease hospital days, and provide savings to the healthcare system. METHODS:: We collected the catheter rates within three dialysis centers served over a 5-year period. Using published data surrounding the incidence and related costs of central line-associated bloodstream infection and mortality per catheter day, the number of central line-associated bloodstream infection events, the costs, and the related mortality could be determined prior to and after the initiation of the dialysis access program. RESULTS:: An organized dialysis access program resulted in a 82% decrease in the number of central venous catheter days which lead to a concurrent reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infection and deaths. As a result of creating an access program, central venous catheter rates decreased from an average rate of 45% to 8%. The cost savings related to the program was calculated to be over US$5 million. The decrease in the number of mortalities is estimated to be between 13 and 27 patients. CONCLUSION:: We conclude that a formalized access program decreases catheter rates, central line-associated bloodstream infection, and the resultant hospitalizations, mortality, and costs. Areas with high hemodialysis catheter rates should develop access programs to better serve their patient population.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/tendencias , Diálisis Renal/tendencias , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/mortalidad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/mortalidad , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/tendencias , Humanos , Incidencia , Maryland/epidemiología , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/instrumentación , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2006, the Federal Joint Committee introduced a quality assurance programme for ambulatory dialysis treatment in Germany. Regarding the impact of chronic dialysis treatment on the quality of life of patients and on health care costs, quality assurance in dialysis is considered highly relevant. The directive on Quality Assurance in Dialysis (QSD-RL) established an external quality assurance programme on the basis of the assessment of certain quality parameters combined with an internal quality management system based on benchmarking parameters in all dialysis practices and centres. Data on quality parameters are collected and analysed quarterly. Regional associations of statutory health insurance physicians take responsibility for quality improvement measures and sanctions. This article aims to provide an overview of the development of quality parameters from 2008 to 2015. METHODS: We analysed the summarised annual quality reports published on the website of the Federal Joint Committee between 2009 and 2016. We present results on the so-called core quality parameters duration and frequency of dialysis sessions (both for haemodialysis patients), wKt/V for peritoneal dialysis patients, and percentage of haemodialysis patients with central venous catheters which has only been measured since 2014. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In 2015, 92,000 patients received outpatient dialysis. Between 2008 and 2015, the results for the core quality parameters duration and frequency of haemodialysis improved while the results for wKt/V seemingly show an unfavourable trend. The percentage of patients with central venous catheters appears to be quite high, and thus indicates that there is potential for quality improvement. FUTURE PERSPECTIVES: For the future, the Federal Joint Committee has resolved to merge the quality assurance programmes in dialysis and in kidney transplantation into a newly designed programme that has the potential to follow patients through all stages and kinds of renal replacement therapy and to focus on further aspects of treatment quality.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Diálisis Peritoneal/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/normas , Diálisis Renal/normas , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Atención Ambulatoria/tendencias , Catéteres de Permanencia/normas , Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Predicción , Alemania , Adhesión a Directriz/economía , Adhesión a Directriz/organización & administración , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Diálisis Peritoneal/tendencias , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/economía , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Calidad de Vida , Diálisis Renal/economía , Diálisis Renal/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite improved health outcomes associated with arteriovenous fistulas, 80% of Americans initiate hemodialysis using a catheter, influenced by low socioeconomic status among other factors. Risk factors for incident catheter use in safety-net populations are unknown. Our objective was to identify factors associated with incident catheter use among hemodialysis patients at one safety-net hospital, with a goal of informing fistula placement initiatives targeted at safety-net populations more generally. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all incident hemodialysis patients at a single urban safety-net hospital from January 1, 2010 - December 31, 2015 (n = 241), as well as semi-structured interviews with a multi-lingual convenience sample of patients (n = 10) from this cohort. The primary outcome was incident vascular access modality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with incident catheter use. Interview transcripts were coded using a directed content analysis framework based on a model describing barriers to healthcare access. RESULTS: Subjects were 61.8% male, racially/ethnically diverse (19.5% white, 29.5% black, 28.6% Hispanic, 17.4% Asian), with a mean age of 52.4 years. Eighty-eight percent initiated hemodialysis using a catheter. In multivariable analysis, longer duration of nephrology care was associated with decreased catheter use (>12 months vs. 0-6 months: adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 0.07, 95% CI 0.02-0.23, p < 0.001), whereas uninsured status increased odds of catheter use (aOR 3.96, 1.23-12.76, p = 0.02). There was a decrease in catheter use after vascular surgery services became available in-hospital (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.16-0.98, p = 0.04), however this association was not significant in multivariable analysis (aOR 0.48, 0.17-1.36, p = 0.17). During interviews, patients cited emotional responses to disease, lack of social and financial resources, and limited health knowledge as barriers to obtaining fistula surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of catheter use in this urban safety-net population is above the national average. Access to health insurance, early referrals to nephrology, and provision of in-hospital vascular surgery should be prioritized in the safety-net. Additionally, services that support patients' emotional and learning needs may decrease delays in fistula placement.
Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Hospitales Urbanos/tendencias , Diálisis Renal/tendencias , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/economía , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hospitales Urbanos/economía , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Masculino , Pacientes no Asegurados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/economía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While the use of technologies such as ultrasound and electrocardiographic (ECG) guidance systems to place peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) has grown, little is known about the clinicians who use these tools or their work settings. METHODS: Using data from a national survey of vascular access specialists, we identified technology users as PICC inserters that: (a) use ultrasound to find a suitable vein for catheter placement; (b) measure catheter-to-vein ratio; and (c) use ECG for PICC placement. Individual and organizational-level characteristics between technology users versus non-users were assessed. Bivariable comparisons were made using Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests; two-sided alpha with p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the 2762 PICC inserters who accessed the survey, 1518 (55%) provided information regarding technology use. Technology users reported greater experience than non-technology users, with a higher percentage stating they had placed >1000 PICCs (55% vs. 45%, p<0.001). A significantly greater percentage of technology users also reported being certified in vascular access by an external agency than non-technology users (75% vs. 63%, p<0.001). Technology users were more often part of vascular access teams with ≥10 members compared to non-technology users (35% vs. 22%, p<0.001). Some practices also varied between the two groups: for example, use of certain securement devices and dressings differed between technology users and non-users (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Technology use by vascular access clinicians while placing PICCs is associated with clinician characteristics, work setting and practice factors. Understanding whether such differences influence clinical care or patient outcomes appears necessary.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Competencia Clínica , Electrocardiografía/tendencias , Diseño de Equipo , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/tendencias , Carga de TrabajoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper is to describe the quality of exit site care by evaluating the use of the Dutch exit site guideline over a period of 15 years. METHOD: The special interest group (SIG) for peritoneal dialysis (PD) analysed results of three surveys concerning general exit site care among members of the Dutch Association for nurses and carers (V&VN), the dialysis and nephrology section. RESULTS: In 2002 (when no guidelines were available) the survey showed huge diversity in practice, with no definition of the post-operative period after catheter placement and no uniform monitoring of the exit site. There was a difference in use of dressings and exit site care. In 2009, the survey showed that most dialysis centres worked with the first guideline of the V&VN (2006) and exit site classification (2006). However, at this time, there was still diversity in the way exit site care was undertaken. In 2016, there was widespread use of guidelines and classification alongside a more individual approach to practice. Differences occured in use of disinfectant, antimicrobial ointment, swimming and going to the sauna. CONCLUSION: The exit site guideline has been widely used in the Netherlands, improving quality in care and utilising a more individual patient approach in care. However, there are still differences identified in practice for which the evidence-base and evaluation will be undertaken to supplement the guideline and attribute to exit site care practice.
Asunto(s)
Guías como Asunto/normas , Diálisis Peritoneal/enfermería , Diálisis Peritoneal/normas , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Consenso , Humanos , Países Bajos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/tendencias , Sociedades de Enfermería/organización & administración , Encuestas y CuestionariosAsunto(s)
Obstrucción del Catéter/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Sistemas de Infusión de Insulina/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Difusión de Innovaciones , Diseño de Equipo/tendencias , Falla de Equipo , Humanos , Sistemas de Infusión de Insulina/tendenciasRESUMEN
Cerebrospinal fluid diversion via ventricular shunting is the prevailing contemporary treatment for hydrocephalus. The CSF shunt appeared in its current form in the 1950s, and modern CSF shunts are the result of 6 decades of significant progress in neurosurgery and biomedical engineering. However, despite revolutionary advances in material science, computational design optimization, manufacturing, and sensors, the ventricular catheter (VC) component of CSF shunts today remains largely unchanged in its functionality and capabilities from its original design, even though VC obstruction remains a primary cause of shunt failure. The objective of this paper is to investigate the history of VCs, including successful and failed alterations in mechanical design and material composition, to better understand the challenges that hinder development of a more effective design.
Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia , Derivaciones del Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/historia , Catéteres de Permanencia/tendencias , Diseño de Equipo/tendencias , Predicción , Historia del Siglo XIX , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , HumanosRESUMEN
The Japanese society for dialysis therapy (JSDT) launched the second edition of 'Guidelines for Vascular Access Construction and Repair for Chronic Hemodialysis' concerning the vascular access in 2011. The indication of long-term catheters is strictly limited in these guidelines because of possible high risks of infections including sepsis and obstruction of catheters with thrombus. In Japan, the long-term catheters would be needed more frequently to prepare the very rapid demographic change within a decade, under the condition that the material and structure of these catheters will be more resistant against the complications.