Efficacy of antimicrobials or placebo compared to amoxicillin-clavulanate in children with acute otitis media: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Acute otitis media (AOM) is the inflammation of the middle ear. It constitutes one of the most frequent infections which affects children and usually occurs between 6 to 24 months of age. AOM can emerge due to viruses and/or bacteria. The aim of the current systematic review is to assess in children between 6 months and 12 years of age with AOM, the efficacy of any antimicrobial agent or placebo compared with amoxicillinclavulanate, to measure the resolution of AOM or symptoms. METHODS: The medical databases PubMed (MEDLINE) and Web of Science were used. Data extraction and analysis were performed by two independent reviewers. Eligibility criteria were set, and only randomised control trials (RCTs) were included. Critical appraisal of the eligible studies was performed. Pooled analysis was conducted using the Review Manager v. 5.4.1 software (RevMan). RESULTS: Twelve RCTs were totally included. Three (25.0%) RCTs studied the impact of azithromycin, two (16.7%) investigated the impact of cefdinir, two (16.7%) investigated placebo, three (25.0%) studied quinolones, one (8.3%) investigated cefaclor and one (8.3%) studied penicillin V, compared to amoxicillin-clavulanate. In five (41.7%) RCTs, amoxicillin-clavulanate proved to be superior to azithromycin, cefdinir, placebo, cefaclor and penicillin V, while in seven (58.3%) RCTs its efficacy was comparable with other antimicrobials or placebo. The rates of AOM relapse after treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanate were comparable to those of other antimicrobials or placebo. However, amoxicillin-clavulanate was more effective in eradicating Streptococcus pneumoniae from the culture, when compared to cefdinir. The results of the meta-analysis were not evaluated due to substantial heterogeneity between studies. CONCLUSIONS: Amoxicillin-clavulanate should be the treatment of choice for children between 6 months and 12 years of age with AOM.

Retrospective Comparison of Cefdinir, Cephalexin, and Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim in the Treatment of Outpatient Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections.

This retrospective single-center study included children aged 2 months to 18 years who were prescribed an oral antibiotic for microbiologically confirmed urinary tract infection (UTI). The primary outcomes were re-encounter to the hospital, emergency department, or urgent care within 30 days and modification of the antibiotic regimen within 14 days. Development of Clostridioides difficile (C difficile) infection or new allergic reaction to the antibiotic prescribed was the secondary outcome. The sample included 2685 children. Rates of re-encounter were similar regardless of the initial antibiotic prescribed (P = .88), and patients who received cefdinir had a lower rate of medication changes (5%) compared with both cephalexin (14%) and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (15%) (P ≤ .001). The most common reason for medication change was susceptibility interpretation. Given its low side-effect profile and narrow spectrum compared with the alternatives, cephalexin appears to be a reasonable choice as first-line therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated pediatric UTI.

Antibiotic Utilization and Efficacy Associated With Treating Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections in Texas Medicaid Patients in the First Year of Life.

BACKGROUND: Historically, amoxicillin (Amoxil) has been used as a first-line agent to treat pediatric urinary tract infections (UTIs). However, emerging antibiotic resistance in urinary pathogens has led to broader treatment options, such as cefdinir (Omnicef). This shift in prescribing practices is predicted to vary among place of service and gender due to differing institutional protocols and antimicrobial stewardship practices. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the antibiotic utilization patterns associated with treating pediatric UTIs in Texas Medicaid patients and to assess the real-world efficacy of the antibiotics that were prescribed. METHODS: Texas Medicaid prescription and medical claims data for patients under 1 year of age were included in the analysis if they presented with a UTI to the healthcare practitioner's office or the emergency department (ED) and were treated with an outpatient antibiotic. Treatment efficacy was assessed by whether a patient received a second (different) antibiotic within 7 days of their initial antibiotic fill. RESULTS: A total of 12,795 visits met inclusion criteria; 12,561 visits included prescriptions for the top 4 antibiotics prescribed: cefdinir (50%), amoxicillin (25%), cephalexin (Keflex; 13%), and amoxicillin-clavulanate (Augmentin; 12%). Cefdinir utilization predominated in both places of service [office (50%) and ED (55%)], and gender [males (47%) and females (52%)]. Controlling for gender and place of service, initial treatment with amoxicillin when compared with cefdinir (OR = 2.54; 95% confidence intervals: 1.84­3.54; P < 0.001) was associated with a greater rate of treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of Texas Medicaid patients, the widespread utilization of cefdinir may be appropriate for the empiric treatment of uncomplicated UTIs because of its low rate of treatment failure compared to other commonly used antibiotics.

The effect of generic market entry on antibiotic prescriptions in the United States.

When patented, brand-name antibiotics lose market exclusivity, generics typically enter the market at lower prices, which may increase consumption of the drug. To examine the effect of generic market entry on antibiotic consumption in the United States, we conducted an interrupted time series analysis of the change in the number of prescriptions per month for antibiotics for which at least one generic entered the US market between 2000 and 2012. Data were acquired from the IQVIA Xponent database. Thirteen antibiotics were analyzed. Here, we show that one year after generic entry, the number of prescriptions increased for five antibiotics (5 to 406%)-aztreonam, cefpodoxime, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin-and decreased for one drug: cefdinir. These changes were sustained two years after. Cefprozil, cefuroxime axetil and clarithromycin had significant increases in trend, but no significant level changes. No consistent pattern for antibiotic use following generic entry in the United States was observed.

Collaboration with an infection control team promoted appropriate antibiotic use for third molar extraction at a Japanese hospital.

Oral antibiotic therapy is routinely administered when a third molar (M3) is extracted to prevent infectious complications after surgery. Oral third-generation cephalosporins are frequently used after M3 extraction in Japan but at the expense of an increased risk of antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, the infection control team (ICT) at our institution recommended a reduction in use of these agents after M3 extraction. In this study, we compared the types of antibiotic agents prescribed for patients undergoing M3 extraction before and after this recommendation. We investigated the relationship between type of antibiotic used and the likelihood of infectious complications as well as cost savings in patients who underwent M3 extraction in the 6 months before and after the ICT recommendation in July 2018. There was a marked reduction in use of oral third-generation cephalosporins after M3 extraction (P < 0.0001) and increased use of oral penicillins and first-generation cephalosporins after the ICT recommendation. Moreover, surgical site infection (SSIs) were significantly less common after the ICT recommendation (P = 0.0099); however, the SSI rate was higher in patients who received a third-generation cephalosporin than in those who received penicillin (8.8% vs 0.5%). There was also a significant saving in per-patient antibiotic costs after the ICT recommendation (269.5 ± 282.0 JPY vs 454.7 ± 376.6 JPY; P < 0.0001). These findings suggest that collaboration with an ICT promotes appropriate antibiotic use, decreases the risk of an SSI, and improves the cost-benefit ratio in patients undergoing M3 extraction.

Use of oral third generation cephalosporins and quinolones and occurrence of antibiotic-resistant strains in the neurogenic bladder (NB) outpatient setting: a retrospective chart audit.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart audit. OBJECTIVES: Neurogenic bladder (NB), a risk factor for urinary tract infection, has not been comprehensively studied in terms of antimicrobial stewardship. In this study, we studied the relationship between the use of oral third generation cephalosporins and quinolones, and the occurrence of antibiotic-resistant strains. SETTING: Hyogo Prefectural Central Rehabilitation Hospital, Hyogo, Japan. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the amount of antibiotics prescribed in outpatients with NB caused by spinal cord injury between 2012 and 2017. We intervened in urological departments whose physicians often prescribed third generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolone, and analyzed the number of prescriptions and the amount of Cefdinir (CFDN) and Levofloxacin (LVFX), and studied changes of ratios in antibiotic-resistant strains such as extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) and quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. RESULTS: The number of CFDN prescriptions per year significantly decreased from 463 cases to 130 cases over 6 years (p = 0.012). The number of LVFX prescriptions per year decreased from 640 cases to 171 cases (p = 0.025). The incidence rate of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae decreased from 25% to 7% of total K. pneumoniae (p < 0.001). The incidence of LVFX-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae significantly decreased in 2017 compared with 2012 (p = 0.03 and p = 0.016, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial stewardship interventions decreased the use of CFDN and LVFX for outpatients with NB. Our findings suggested that the reduction in the use of third generation cephalosporins and quinolones correlates with observed decrease in the occurrence of antibiotic-resistant, ESBL-producing, and quinolone-resistant bacteria.

Pyelonephritis treatment in the community emergency department: Cephalosporins vs. first-line agents.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess treatment with a fluoroquinolone or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus cephalosporins for pyelonephritis in discharged patients from a community hospital setting. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed for adult female patients who received a prescription for a cephalosporin, fluoroquinolone or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of pyelonephritis within the network of a large healthcare system. The primary endpoint evaluated the failure rate of each treatment group. The secondary endpoint evaluated the difference between rates of resistance on culture and sensitivity reports for treatment groups. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients in the cephalosporin group and 43 patients in the fluoroquinolone and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group were reviewed. The primary endpoint occurred in 0% of the patients in the cephalosporin group and in 23% of the patients in the fluoroquinolone and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group, p < 0.001. Of the 98 urine samples collected, 71 samples were positive for pathogen growth. Upon evaluation of these isolates, 6% were resistant to cephalexin, 1% was resistant to cefdinir, 3% were resistant to ciprofloxacin and 23% were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole showed statistical significance for more bacterial resistance compared to the other agents, p < 0.01. CONCLUSION: Failure of therapy for pyelonephritis occurred more often in the fluoroquinolone and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group than in the cephalosporin group. The findings in this study are most applicable to patients who are treated on an outpatient basis. A prospective, randomized clinical trial is necessary to confirm these results.