Activity of polymyxin B combined with cefepime-avibactam against the biofilms of polymyxin B-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae in in vitro and in vivo models.

Bacterial biofilms, often forming on medical devices, can lead to treatment failure due to their increased antimicrobial resistance. Cefepime-avibactam (CFP-AVI) exhibits potent activities against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) when used with polymyxin B (PMB). However, its efficacy in biofilm-related infections is unknown. The present study aimed to evaluate the activity of PMB combined with CFP-AVI against the biofilms of PMB-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Five K. pneumoniae strains and three P. aeruginosa strains known to be PMB-resistant and prone to biofilm formation were selected and evaluated. Antimicrobial susceptibility assays demonstrated that the minimal biofilm inhibitory and eradication concentrations of PMB and CFP-AVI for biofilms formed by the eight strains were significantly higher than the minimal inhibitory concentrations of the antibiotics for planktonic cells. The biofilm formation inhibition and eradication assays showed that PMB combined with CFP-AVI cannot only suppress the formation of biofilm but also effectively eradicate the preformed mature biofilms. In a modified in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic biofilm model, CFP-AVI monotherapy exhibited a bacteriostatic or effective activity against the biofilms of seven strains, whereas PMB monotherapy did not have any activity at 72 h. However, PMB combined with CFP-AVI demonstrated bactericidal activity against the biofilms of all strains at 72 h. In an in vivo Galleria mellonella infection model, the 7-day survival rates of larvae infected with biofilm implants of K. pneumoniae or P. aeruginosa were 0-6.7%, 40.0-63.3%, and 46.7-90.0%, respectively, for PMB alone, CFP-AVI alone, and PMB combined with CFP-AVI; the combination therapy increased the rate by 6.7-33.3% (P < 0.05, n = 6), compared to CFP-AVI monotherapy. It is concluded that PMB combined with CFP-AVI exhibits effective anti-biofilm activities against PMB-resistant K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa both in vitro and in vivo, and thus may be a promising therapeutic strategy to treat biofilm-related infections.

Antibiotics stimulates the development of persistent cells in biofilms of Candida albicans bloodstream isolates.

Candida albicans invasive candidiasis is considered a global health problem. In such cases, biofilm formation on implanted devices represents a therapeutic challenge and the presence of metabolically inactive persistent cells (PCs) in these communities increases their tolerance to fungicidal drugs. This study investigated the influence of amoxicillin, AMX; cefepime, CEF; gentamicin, GEN; amikacin, AMK; vancomycin, VAN; and ciprofloxacin, CIP; on the production of PCs in biofilms of C. albicans bloodstream isolates. 48 h-mature biofilms (n = 6) grown in RPMI-1640 supplemented with antibiotics were treated with 100 µg ml-1 amphotericin B and then evaluated for PCs. Biofilms grown in the presence of antibiotics produced more PCs, up to 10×, when exposed to AMX and CIP; 5 × to CEF; and 6 × to GEN and VAN. The results indicate that antibiotics can modulate PC production in C. albicans biofilms. This scenario may have clinical repercussions in immunocompromised patients under broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy.

Biofilms are microbial communities tolerant to antifungals. Our research showed that antibiotics stimulate the formation of persistent cells within Candida albicans biofilms. These are dormant, metabolically silent cells that resist to therapy and can be related to metastatic and recalcitrant infections.

Pharmacodynamics of taniborbactam in combination with cefepime studied in an in vitro model of infection.

OBJECTIVES: To define the in vitro pharmacodynamics of taniborbactam against Enterobacterales with CTXM-15, KPC, AmpC, and OXA-48 ß-lactamases. METHODS: An in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate serum concentrations associated with cefepime 2G by 1 h infusion 8 h. Taniborbactam was given in exposure ranging and fractionation simulations. Reduction in viable count at 24 h (Δ 24) was the primary end point and four strains were used: Escherichia coli expressing CTXM-15 or AmpC and Klebsiella pneumoniae expressing KPC or OXA-48 enzymes. RESULTS: Taniborbactam was administered as continuous infusions; ≥4 log kill was attained with taniborbactam concentrations of ≥0.01 mg/L against CTXM-15 E. coli, ≥0.5 mg/L against KPC- and OXA-48 K. pneumoniae, and ≥4 mg/L against AmpC E. coli. Analyses were conducted to determine the pharmacokinetic/dynamic driver for each strain. For E. coli (CTXM-15) and E. coli (AmpC), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was best related to change in viable count (R20.74 and 0.72, respectively). For K. pneumoniae (KPC) AUC and T > 0.25 mg/L were equally related to bacterial clearance (R20.72 for both), and for K. pneumoniae (OXA-48) T > 0.25 mg/L was the best predictor (R20.94). The taniborbactam AUC range to produce a 1-log10 reduction in viable count was 4.4-11.2 mg·h/L. Analysis of data from all strains indicated T > MIC divided by 4 was best related to change in viable count; however, curve fit was poor R2 < 0.49. CONCLUSIONS: Taniborbactam was effective in combination with cefepime in producing bacterial clearance for B lactam resistant Enterobacterales. The primary pharmacodynamic driver was AUC or time > threshold, both being closely related to antibacterial effect.

ARGONAUT-III and -V: susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the bicyclic boronate ß-lactamase inhibitor taniborbactam combined with cefepime.

Taniborbactam, a bicyclic boronate ß-lactamase inhibitor with activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), Verona integron-encoded metallo-ß-lactamase (VIM), New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase (NDM), extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), OXA-48, and AmpC ß-lactamases, is under clinical development in combination with cefepime. Susceptibility of 200 previously characterized carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and 197 multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa to cefepime-taniborbactam and comparators was determined by broth microdilution. For K. pneumoniae (192 KPC; 7 OXA-48-related), MIC90 values of ß-lactam components for cefepime-taniborbactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam were 2, 2, and 1 mg/L, respectively. For cefepime-taniborbactam, 100% and 99.5% of isolates of K. pneumoniae were inhibited at ≤16 mg/L and ≤8 mg/L, respectively, while 98.0% and 95.5% of isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam, respectively. For P. aeruginosa, MIC90 values of ß-lactam components of cefepime-taniborbactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam were 16, >8, >8, and >4 mg/L, respectively. Of 89 carbapenem-susceptible isolates, 100% were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam at ≤8 mg/L. Of 73 carbapenem-intermediate/resistant P. aeruginosa isolates without carbapenemases, 87.7% were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam, 79.5% to ceftazidime-avibactam, and 95.9% and 83.6% to cefepime-taniborbactam at ≤16 mg/L and ≤8 mg/L, respectively. Cefepime-taniborbactam at ≤16 mg/L and ≤8 mg/L, respectively, was active against 73.3% and 46.7% of 15 VIM- and 60.0% and 35.0% of 20 KPC-producing P. aeruginosa isolates. Of all 108 carbapenem-intermediate/resistant P. aeruginosa isolates, cefepime-taniborbactam was active against 86.1% and 69.4% at ≤16 mg/L and ≤8 mg/L, respectively, compared to 59.3% for ceftolozane-tazobactam and 63.0% for ceftazidime-avibactam. Cefepime-taniborbactam had in vitro activity comparable to ceftazidime-avibactam and greater than meropenem-vaborbactam against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and carbapenem-intermediate/resistant MDR P. aeruginosa.

Comparing the activity of broad-spectrum beta-lactams in combination with aminoglycosides against VIM-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections continue to pose a serious threat to healthcare. Due to their unique active site, MBLs evade the activity of many novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, which have been specifically targeted toward those carbapenemases with serine active sites. Furthermore, resistance to most, if not all, other clinically relevant antimicrobial classes leaves few reliable therapeutic options. Combination therapy has thus played a vital role in the treatment of MBL-producing CRE infections. In this study, we utilized the static time-kill assay to investigate clinically relevant concentrations of cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem alone and in combination with either amikacin or the novel plazomicin to determine if combinations of routinely used beta-lactam therapy with an aminoglycoside would achieve bactericidal activity against eight clinically isolated Verona integron-encoded MBL (VIM)-producing CRE. Furthermore, we compared this activity to the combination of aztreonam/avibactam, which has shown potent activity against MBL-producing CRE. Both aztreonam/avibactam and meropenem with either aminoglycoside were rapidly bactericidal within 4 hours and remained bactericidal through 24 hours against all isolates with few exceptions. Combinations including cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam were also rapidly bactericidal, but activity after 24 hours was inconsistent depending upon the partner aminoglycoside and isolate. Further investigation is warranted to elucidate optimal antibiotic exposures against MBL-producing CRE, including novel agents in the pipeline.IMPORTANCECarbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are one of the most pressing antimicrobial-resistant threats at present. In addition to exhibiting resistance to many, if not all, commonly used antimicrobial agents, CRE achieves these resistant phenotypes through a variety of mechanisms, each of which can uniquely affect available treatment options. The present study is an in vitro investigation of several Verona integron-encoded metallo-beta-lactamase (VIM)-producing CRE isolated from patients at our academic medical center. Because metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) are inherently resistant to many of the novel treatments designed to treat CRE due to their different active site composition, we tested several antimicrobial combinations containing routinely utilized broad-spectrum beta-lactams and aminoglycosides. Our results further our understanding of combination therapy options against VIM-producing CRE, including with non-carbapenem-beta-lactams cefepime and piperacillin. By optimizing combinations of existing antimicrobial agents, we hope to expand the available armamentarium against these resistant pathogens.

Cefepime-Taniborbactam: A Novel Cephalosporin/ß-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination.

Taniborbactam (formerly known as VNRX-5133) is a novel bicyclic boronate ß-lactamase inhibitor of serine ß-lactamases (SBLs) [Ambler classes A, C, and D] and metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs) [Ambler class B], including NDM and VIM, but not IMP. Cefepime-taniborbactam is active in vitro against most isolates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA), including both carbapenemase-producing and carbapenemase-non-producing CRE and CRPA, as well as against multidrug-resistant (MDR), ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant, meropenem-vaborbactam-resistant, and ceftolozane-tazobactam-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. The addition of taniborbactam to cefepime resulted in a > 64-fold reduction in MIC90 compared with cefepime alone for a 2018-2021 global collection of > 13,000 clinical isolates of Enterobacterales. In the same study, against > 4600 P. aeruginosa, a fourfold MIC reduction was observed with cefepime-taniborbactam, compared with cefepime alone. Whole genome sequencing studies have shown that resistance towards cefepime-taniborbactam in Enterobacterales arises due to the presence of multiple resistance mechanisms, often in concert, including production of IMP, PBP3 alterations, permeability (porin) defects, and upregulation of efflux pumps. In P. aeruginosa, elevated cefepime-taniborbactam MICs are also associated with the presence of multiple, concurrent mechanisms, most frequently IMP, PBP3 mutations, and upregulation of efflux pumps, as well as AmpC (PDC) overexpression. The pharmacokinetics of taniborbactam are dose proportional, follow a linear model, and do not appear to be affected when combined with cefepime. Taniborbactam's approximate volume of distribution (Vd) at steady state is 20 L and the approximate elimination half-life (t½) is 2.3 h, which are similar to cefepime. Furthermore, like cefepime, taniborbactam is primarily cleared renally, and clearance corresponds with renal function. Pharmacodynamic studies (in vitro and in vivo) have reported that cefepime-taniborbactam has bactericidal activity against various ß-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacilli that are not susceptible to cefepime alone. It has been reported that antimicrobial activity best correlated with taniborbactam exposure (area under the curve). A phase III clinical trial showed that cefepime-taniborbactam (2 g/0.5 g administered as an intravenous infusion over 2 h) was superior to meropenem for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), including acute pyelonephritis, caused by Enterobacterales species and P. aeruginosa while demonstrating similar safety compared with meropenem. The safety and tolerability of taniborbactam and cefepime-taniborbactam has been reported in one pharmacokinetic trial, and in two pharmacokinetic trials and one phase III clinical trial, respectively. Cefepime-taniborbactam appears to be well tolerated in both healthy subjects and patients. Headache and gastrointestinal upset are the most common drug-related adverse effects associated with cefepime-taniborbactam use. Cefepime-taniborbactam will likely have a role in the treatment of infections proven or suspected to be caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria, including Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. In particular, it may be useful in the treatment of infections caused by isolates that harbor an MBL (NDM, VIM) enzyme, although further clinical data are needed. Additional safety and efficacy studies may support indications for cefepime-taniborbactam beyond cUTI.

Colistin-, cefepime-, and levofloxacin-resistant Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from Egyptian chicken carcasses.

OBJECTIVES: The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Salmonella strains, especially resistant ones toward critically important antimicrobial classes such as fluoroquinolones and third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, is a growing public health concern. The current study, therefore, aimed to determine the prevalence, and existence of virulence genes (invA, stn, and spvC genes), antimicrobial resistance profiles, and the presence of ß-lactamase resistance genes (blaOXA, blaCTX-M1, blaSHV, and blaTEM) in Salmonella strains isolated from native chicken carcasses in Egypt marketed in Mansoura, Egypt, as well as spotlight the risk of isolated MDR, colistin-, cefepime-, and levofloxacin-resistant Salmonella enterica serovars to public health. METHODS: One hundred fifty freshly dressed native chicken carcasses were collected from different poultry shops in Mansoura City, Egypt between July 2022 and November 2022. Salmonella isolation was performed using standard bacteriological techniques, including pre-enrichment in buffered peptone water (BPW), selective enrichment in Rappaport Vassiliadis broth (RVS), and cultivating on the surface of xylose-lysine-desoxycholate (XLD) agar. All suspected Salmonella colonies were subjected to biochemical tests, serological identification using slide agglutination test, and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) targeting the invasion A gene (invA; Salmonella marker gene). Afterward, all molecularly verified isolates were screened for the presence of virulence genes (stn and spvC). The antimicrobial susceptibility testing for isolated Salmonella strains towards the 16 antimicrobial agents tested was analyzed by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method, except for colistin, in which the minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) was determined by broth microdilution technique. Furthermore, 82 cefotaxime-resistant Salmonella isolates were tested using multiplex PCR targeting the ß-lactamase resistance genes, including blaOXA, blaCTX-M1, blaSHV, and blaTEM genes. RESULTS: Salmonella enterica species were molecularly confirmed via the invA Salmonella marker gene in 18% (27/150) of the freshly dressed native chicken carcasses. Twelve Salmonella serotypes were identified among 129 confirmed Salmonella isolates with the most predominant serotypes were S. Kentucky, S. Enteritidis, S. Typhimurium, and S. Molade with an incidence of 19.4% (25/129), 17.1% (22/129), 17.1% (22/129), and 10.9% (14/129), respectively. All the identified Salmonella isolates (n = 129) were positive for both invA and stn genes, while only 31.8% (41/129) of isolates were positive for the spvC gene. One hundred twenty-one (93.8%) of the 129 Salmonella-verified isolates were resistant to at least three antibiotics. Interestingly, 3.9%, 14.7%, and 75.2% of isolates were categorized into pan-drug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, and multidrug-resistant, respectively. The average MAR index for the 129 isolates tested was 0.505. Exactly, 82.2%, 82.2%, 63.6%, 51.9%, 50.4%, 48.8%, 11.6%, and 10.1% of isolated Salmonella strains were resistant to cefepime, colistin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime/clavulanic acid, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, and meropenem, respectively. Thirty-one out (37.8%) of the 82 cefotaxime-resistant Salmonella isolates were ß-lactamase producers with the blaTEM as the most predominant ß-lactamase resistance gene, followed by blaCTX-M1 and blaOXA genes, which were detected in 21, 16, and 14 isolates respectively). CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of MDR-, colistin-, cefepime-, and levofloxacin-resistant Salmonella serovars among Salmonella isolates from native chicken is alarming as these antimicrobials are critically important in treating severe salmonellosis cases and boost the urgent need for controlling antibiotic usage in veterinary and human medicine to protect public health.

Exploring synergistic and antagonistic interactions in phage-antibiotic combinations against ESKAPE pathogens.

In the era of antimicrobial resistance, phage-antibiotic combinations offer a promising therapeutic option, yet research on their synergy and antagonism is limited. This study aims to assess these interactions, focusing on protein synthesis inhibitors and cell envelope-active agents against multidrug-resistant bacterial strains. We evaluated synergistic and antagonistic interactions in multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Phages were combined with protein synthesis inhibitors [linezolid (LZD), minocycline (MIN), gentamicin (GEN), and azithromycin (AZM)] or cell envelope-active agents [daptomycin (DAP), ceftaroline (CPT), and cefepime (FEP)]. Modified checkerboard minimum inhibitory concentration assays and 24-h time-kill analyses were conducted, alongside one-step growth curves to analyze phage growth kinetics. Statistical comparisons used one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey test (P < 0.05). In the checkerboard and 24-h time-kill analyses (TKA) of S. aureus and E. faecium, phage-LZD and phage-MIN combinations were antagonistic (FIC > 4) while phage-DAP and phage-CPT were synergistic (FIC 0.5) (ANOVA range of mean differences 0.52-2.59 log10 CFU/mL; P < 0.001). For P. aeruginosa, phage-AZM was antagonistic (FIC > 4), phage-GEN was additive (FIC = 1), and phage-FEP was synergistic (ANOVA range of mean differences 1.04-1.95 log10 CFU/mL; P < 0.001). Phage growth kinetics were altered in the presence of LZD and MIN against S. aureus and in the presence of LZD against a single E. faecium strain (HOU503). Our findings indicate that select protein synthesis inhibitors may induce phage-antibiotic antagonism. However, this antagonism may not solely stem from changes in phage growth kinetics, warranting further investigation into the complex interplay among strains, phage attributes, and antibiotic mechanisms affecting bacterial inhibition.IMPORTANCEIn the face of escalating antimicrobial resistance, combining phages with antibiotics offers a promising avenue for treating infections unresponsive to traditional antibiotics. However, while studies have explored synergistic interactions, less attention has been given to potential antagonism and its impact on phage growth kinetics. This research evaluates the interplay between phages and antibiotics, revealing both synergistic and antagonistic patterns across various bacterial strains and shedding light on the complex dynamics that influence treatment efficacy. Understanding these interactions is crucial for optimizing combination therapies and advancing phage therapy as a viable solution for combating antimicrobial resistance.

Impact of extended-spectrum chromosomal AmpC (ESAC) of Escherichia coli on susceptibility to cefiderocol.

The impact of chromosomally encoded wild-type or extended-spectrum (ESAC) AmpC ß-lactamases of Escherichia coli on susceptibility to ceftazidime, cefepime, and cefiderocol was evaluated in different genetic backgrounds, including wild-type, PBP3-modified, and porin-deficient E. coli strains. Recombinant E. coli strains possessing the different backgrounds and producing variable ESACs were evaluated. Although ESAC enzymes conferred resistance to ceftazidime and decreased susceptibility to cefepime as expected, we showed here that cefiderocol was also a substrate of ESAC enzymes. IMPORTANCE: We showed here that chromosomally encoded intrinsic extended-spectrum cephalosporinases of Escherichia coli may impact susceptibility not only to ceftazidime and cefepime but also to cefiderocol.

Postdiscontinuation Antibiotic Exposure in Hospitalized Infants at Risk for Late-onset Sepsis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: In the neonatal intensive care unit, infants are at risk for late-onset sepsis. When blood cultures are negative, antibiotic stewardship efforts encourage stopping antibiotics, yet the duration of therapeutic exposure after the last dose is unknown. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of simulated antibiotic exposures used published population pharmacokinetic models within drug-specific neonatal intensive care unit cohorts of preterm and term infants, postnatal age 7-60 days and exposed to cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam or tobramycin. Monte Carlo simulations (NONMEM 7.3) were used to predict steady-state exposures after a 72-hour antibiotic course per Neofax dosing. Exposure was assessed relative to drug-specific minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) targets between 1 and 16 mcg/mL for Pseudomonas and Enterobacteriaceae species. Postdiscontinuation antibiotic exposure (PDAE) was defined as the time from the last dose to when antibiotic concentration decreased below a specific MIC. RESULTS: Piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime and tobramycin cohorts included infants with median gestation age 29, 32 and 32 weeks and postnatal age 17, 19 and 15 days, respectively. The mean PDAE was 19-68 hours, depending on the specific antibiotic/MIC combination. PDAE was longer for infants <28 days old and preterm (vs. term) infants. Cefepime exhibited the longest mean PDAE of 68 hours for Enterobacteriaceae MIC 1. Piperacillin mean PDAE was 25 hours for Enterobacteriaceae MIC 8. Tobramycin had a short mean PDAE of 19 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Piperacillin and cefepime exposures remained therapeutic long after the expected 8- to 12-hour dosing interval. PDAE is an important consideration for antibiotic stewardship among hospitalized infants, particularly premature infants and those within 1 month postbirth.

Comparison of BD Phoenix and disk diffusion to broth microdilution for determining cefepime susceptibility among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.

There are increasing reports of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) that test as cefepime-susceptible (S) or susceptible-dose dependent (SDD). However, there are no data to compare the cefepime testing performance of BD Phoenix automated susceptibility system (BD Phoenix) and disk diffusion (DD) relative to reference broth microdilution (BMD) against carbapenemase-producing (CPblaKPC-CRE) and non-producing (non-CP CRE) isolates. Cefepime susceptibility results were interpreted according to CLSI M100Ed32. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), minor errors (miEs), major errors (MEs), and very major errors (VMEs) were calculated for BD Phoenix (NMIC-306 Gram-negative panel) and DD relative to BMD. Correlates were also analyzed by the error rate-bounded method. EA and CA for CPblaKPC-CRE isolates (n = 64) were <90% with BD Phoenix while among non-CP CRE isolates (n = 58), EA and CA were 96.6%, and 79.3%, respectively. CA was <90% with DD for both cohorts. No ME or VME was observed for either isolate cohort; however, miEs were >10% for CPblaKPC-CRE and non-CP CRE with BD Phoenix and DD tests. For error rate-bounded method, miEs were <40% for IHigh + 1 to ILow - 1 ranges for CPblaKPC-CRE and non-CP CRE with BD Phoenix. Regarding disk diffusion, miEs were unacceptable for all MIC ranges among CPblaKPC-CRE. For non-CP CRE isolates, only IHigh + 1 to ILow - 1 range was acceptable at 37.2%. Using this challenge set of genotypic-phenotypic discordant CRE, the BD Phoenix MICs and DD susceptibility results trended higher (toward SDD and resistant phenotypes) relative to reference BMD results yielding lower CA. These results were more prominent among CPblaKPC-CRE than non-CP CRE.

Cefepime-taniborbactam and CERTAIN-1: Can we treat carbapenem-resistant infections?

Wagenlehner and colleagues1 demonstrated non-inferiority and superiority with respect to a primary endpoint of composite success (microbiological plus clinical) of cefepime/taniborbactam vs. meropenem in treating complicated urinary tract infections and acute pyelonephritis caused by carbapenem-susceptible gram-negative bacteria in adults. A major area of interest in real-world application of cefepime/taniborbactam is its potential role in treating carbapenem-resistant infections, which deserves further investigation.

Patient outcomes by baseline pathogen resistance phenotype and genotype in CERTAIN-1, a Phase 3 study of cefepime-taniborbactam versus meropenem in adults with complicated urinary tract infection.

CERTAIN-1 was a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study of the efficacy and safety of cefepime-taniborbactam versus meropenem in the treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), including acute pyelonephritis. We determined susceptibility of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa baseline pathogens to cefepime-taniborbactam and comparators and characterized ß-lactam resistance mechanisms. Microbiologic response and clinical response were assessed in patient subsets defined by baseline pathogens that were of cefepime-, multidrug-, or carbapenem-resistant phenotype or that carried ß-lactamase genes. Among Enterobacterales baseline pathogens, 26.8%, 4.1%, and 3.0% carried genes for extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC, and carbapenemases, respectively. Within each treatment group, while composite success rates at Test of Cure in resistant subsets by pathogen species were similar to those by pathogen overall, composite success rates in meropenem patients were numerically lower for cefepime-resistant Escherichia coli (9/19; 47.4%) and ESBL E. coli (13/25; 52.0%) compared with E. coli overall (62/100; 62.0%). Cefepime-taniborbactam achieved composite success in 7/8 (87.5%) patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and 8/9 (88.9%) patients with Enterobacterales with a carbapenemase gene (5 OXA-48-group; 2 KPC-3; 2 NDM-1). Cefepime-taniborbactam also achieved composite success in 8/16 (50.0%) patients and clinical success in 13/16 (81.3%) patients with P. aeruginosa; corresponding rates were 4/7 (57.1%) and 6/7 (85.7%) for meropenem. Cefepime-taniborbactam demonstrated efficacy in adult cUTI patients with cefepime-, multidrug-, and carbapenem-resistant pathogens including pathogens with ESBL, AmpC, and carbapenemase genes. CLINICAL TRIALS: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03840148.

Evaluation of the activity of cefepime/enmetazobactam against Enterobacterales bacteria collected in Europe from 2019 to 2021, including third-generation cephalosporin-resistant isolates.

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to investigate the activity of the novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination cefepime/enmetazobactam, against recently circulating Enterobacterales isolates from Europe from 2019 to 2021. METHODS: A total of 2627 isolates were collected, and antimicrobial susceptibility was determined according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines. Isolates with phenotypic resistance to ceftriaxone and ceftazidime (but susceptible to meropenem) and isolates nonsusceptible to meropenem were screened for the presence of ß-lactamases. RESULTS: Overall, susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins was 77%, and 97.3% were susceptible to meropenem. Cefepime/enmetazobactam susceptibility was 97.9% (72% of these isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae from Italy), compared with 80.0% susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam and 99.4% to ceftazidime/avibactam. A total of 320 isolates (12.2%) were resistant to third-generation cephalosporins but susceptible to meropenem, and virtually all (96.3%) carried an extended-spectrum ß-lactamase with or without an AmpC and these were all susceptible to cefepime/enmetazobactam. Most meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates carried a KPC (68%), which were not inhibited by cefepime/enmetazobactam but were inhibited by ceftazidime/avibactam. Additionally, most meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates carrying OXA-48 (9/12 isolates) were susceptible to cefepime/enmetazobactam. CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime/enmetazobactam was highly active against Enterobacterales isolates, especially those resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. These data suggest that cefepime/enmetazobactam could be used as a carbapenem-sparing agent to replace piperacillin/tazobactam.

Cefepime/Enmetazobactam: First Approval.

Cefepime/enmetazobactam (EXBLIFEP®), an intravenous (IV) antibacterial fixed-dose combination of a 4th generation cephalosporin and an extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) inhibitor, is being developed by Allecra Therapeutics and ADVANZ PHARMA for the treatment of infections caused by multi-drug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria. In February 2024, cefepime/enmetazobactam was approved in the USA for use in adults with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) including pyelonephritis, caused by susceptible strains of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, and Enterobacter cloacae complex. In March 2024, cefepime/enmetazobactam was approved in the EU for use in adults for the treatment of cUTI, including pyelonephritis, and hospital-acquired pneumonia, including ventilator associated pneumonia, and the treatment of patients with bacteraemia occurring in association with or suspected to be associated with any of these infections. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of cefepime/enmetazobactam leading to this first approval for the treatment of adults with infections caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria.

Antimicrobial activity of cefepime-tazobactam combination against extended spectrum beta-lactamase and/or AmpC beta-lactamase- producing gram-negative bacilli.

BACKGROUND: The problem of resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, which is caused by ESBL and AmpC ß-lactamases, is getting worse globally. Infections caused by bacterial isolates harboring these enzymes are difficult to treat with carbapenems being the sole effective treatment option for such infections. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of ESBLs and AmpC-producing Gram-negative bacilli isolated from clinical specimens and to evaluate the sensitivity of cefepime-tazobactam combination against them. METHODS: This is an observational cross-sectional study carried out on 100 Gram-negative bacilli at Theodor Bilharz Research Institute Hospital during the period from February 2015 to January 2016. ESBL production was screened by using the disc diffusion test followed by confirmation by the combined disc confirmatory test, the screening for AmpC production was conducted using the cefoxitin disc test, which was subsequently confirmed by the AmpC disc test. Isolates confirmed positive for ESBL and/ or AmpC production were investigated for their susceptibility to antibiotics. RESULTS: Among 100 Gram-negative bacilli, 44 isolates were confirmed as ESBL producers by the combined disc confirmatory test out of 56 isolates that tested positive for ESBL production through the disc diffusion test. The presence of AmpC production was assessed using the cefoxitin disc test, 32 isolates were screened to be AmpC producers, and the AmpC disc test confirmed AmpC production in 9 isolates of them. Using the Mast® D68C set, 32 isolates were ESBL producers, 3 were AmpC producers, and 4 isolates were ESBL/AmpC co-producers. The highest sensitivity was to cefepime-tazobactam (91.48%) followed by the carbapenems. CONCLUSION: Cefepime-tazobactam showed remarkable activity against ESBL and/or AmpC-producing Gram-negative bacilli and may be considered as a therapeutic alternative to carbapenems.

Treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: A practical approach by the Italian (SIMIT) and French (SPILF) Societies of Infectious Diseases.

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and the development of new antibiotics have complicated the selection of optimal regimens. International guidelines are valuable tools, but are limited by the scarcity of high-quality randomized trials in many situations. METHODS: A panel of experts from the French and Italian Societies of Infectious Diseases aimed to address unresolved issues in clinical practice based on their experience, an updated literature review and open discussions. RESULTS: The panel reached consensus for the following 'first choices': (i) cefepime for ventilator-acquired pneumonia due to AmpC ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales; (ii) the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination most active in vitro, or cefiderocol combined with fosfomycin, and aerosolized colistin or aminoglycosides, for severe pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to ceftolozane-tazobactam; (iii) high-dose piperacillin-tazobactam (including loading dose and continuous infusion) for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales with piperacillin-tazobactam minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤8 mg/L; (iv) high-dose cefepime for cUTIs due to AmpC ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales other than Enterobacter spp. if cefepime MIC ≤2 mg/L; (v) ceftolozane-tazobactam or ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole for intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) due to third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales; (vi) ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam plus metronidazole for IAIs due to metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales; (vii) ampicillin-sulbactam plus colistin for bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; (viii) meropenem-vaborbactam for BSIs caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales; and (ix) ceftazidime-avibactam plus fosfomycin for neurological infections caused by carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: These expert choices were based on the necessary balance between antimicrobial stewardship principles and the need to provide optimal treatment for individual patients in each situation.

Activity of cefiderocol and innovative ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations against isogenic strains of Escherichia coli expressing single and double ß-lactamases under high and low permeability conditions.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the impact of the most clinically relevant ß-lactamases and their interplay with low outer membrane permeability on the activity of cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, meropenem/xeruborbactam and meropenem/nacubactam against recombinant Escherichia coli strains. METHODS: We constructed 82 E. coli laboratory transformants expressing the main ß-lactamases circulating in Enterobacterales (70 expressing single ß-lactamase and 12 producing double carbapenemase) under high (E. coli TG1) and low (E. coli HB4) permeability conditions. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was determined by reference broth microdilution. RESULTS: Aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/zidebactam, cefiderocol, meropenem/xeruborbactam and meropenem/nacubactam were active against all E. coli TG1 transformants. Imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, cefepime/taniborbactam and cefepime/enmetazobactam were also highly active, but unstable against most of MBL-producing transformants. Combination of ß-lactamases with porin deficiency (E. coli HB4) did not significantly affect the activity of aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/zidebactam, cefiderocol or meropenem/nacubactam, but limited the effectiveness of the rest of carbapenem- and cefepime-based combinations. Double-carbapenemase production resulted in the loss of activity of most of the compounds tested, an effect particularly evident for those E. coli HB4 transformants in which MBLs were present. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the promising activity that cefiderocol and new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors have against recombinant E. coli strains expressing widespread ß-lactamases, including when these are combined with low permeability or other enzymes. Aztreonam/avibactam, cefiderocol, cefepime/zidebactam and meropenem/nacubactam will help to mitigate to some extent the urgency of new compounds able to resist MBL action, although NDM enzymes represent a growing challenge against which drug development efforts are still needed.

In vitro development of resistance against antipseudomonal agents: comparison of novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations and other ß-lactam agents.

We subjected seven P. aeruginosa isolates to a 10-day serial passaging against five antipseudomonal agents to evaluate resistance levels post-exposure and putative resistance mechanisms in terminal mutants were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing analysis. Meropenem (mean, 38-fold increase), cefepime (14.4-fold), and piperacillin-tazobactam (52.9-fold) terminal mutants displayed high minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values compared to those obtained after exposure to ceftolozane-tazobactam (11.4-fold) and ceftazidime-avibactam (5.7-fold). Fewer isolates developed elevated MIC values for other ß-lactams and agents belonging to other classes when exposed to meropenem in comparison to other agents. Alterations in nalC and nalD, involved in the upregulation of the efflux pump system MexAB-OprM, were common and observed more frequently in isolates exposed to ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem. These alterations, along with ones in mexR and amrR, provided resistance to most ß-lactams and levofloxacin but not imipenem. The second most common gene altered was mpl, which is involved in the recycling of the cell wall peptidoglycan. These alterations were mainly noted in isolates exposed to ceftolozane-tazobactam and piperacillin-tazobactam but also in one cefepime-exposed isolate. Alterations in other genes known to be involved in ß-lactam resistance (ftsI, oprD, phoP, pepA, and cplA) and multiple genes involved in lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis were also present. The data generated here suggest that there is a difference in the mechanisms selected for high-level resistance between newer ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations and older agents. Nevertheless, the isolates exposed to all agents displayed elevated MIC values for other ß-lactams (except imipenem) and quinolones tested mainly due to alterations in the MexAB-OprM regulators that extrude these agents.

Effect of modification of penicillin-binding protein 3 on susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, and cefiderocol of Escherichia coli strains producing broad-spectrum ß-lactamases.

The impact of penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3) modifications that may be identified in Escherichia coli was evaluated with respect to susceptibility to ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations including ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, and to cefiderocol. A large series of E. coli recombinant strains producing broad-spectrum ß-lactamases was evaluated. While imipenem-relebactam showed a similar activity regardless of the PBP3 background, susceptibility to other molecules tested was affected at various levels. This was particularly the case for ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam.