Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 147
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr Surg ; 59(6): 1094-1100, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38402131

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: There are limited studies assessing modifiable preoperative risk factors for pediatric laparoscopic gastrostomy tubes (LGT) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. We sought to evaluate the effect of demographics and surgical/infectious history on the superficial infection rate following gastrostomy tube (GT) placement. METHODS: After IRB approval, we conducted a single-institution retrospective cohort study from 2015 to 2021 of pediatric patients undergoing LGT or PEG tube. The primary outcome was cellulitis or abscess formation within 30-days and 90-days postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed with t-tests, Chi-squared, and logistic regression(p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: There were 382 patients, with 181 (47%) LGT and 201 (53%) PEGs. LGT patients were younger (5.9 vs. 12.3 months, p < 0.001) and more likely to be admitted to the neonatal or cardiac intensive care unit prior to their GT. There were similar rates of prior surgical intervention (58% vs. 66%, p = 0.29) and previous infection (37% vs. 38%, p = 0.87) in both LGT and PEG patients. Within 30-days postoperatively, LGT patients had a higher superficial infection rate (12% vs. 6%, p = 0.04). On multivariate regression, Black race (Odds Ratio 0.10, p = 0.03) was protective and prior Staphylococcus colonization (OR 2.35, p = 0.04) increased the odds of infection. In those patients colonized with Staphylococcus, 21% developed a superficial site infection compared to 9% in those not colonized (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: These data suggest prior Staphylococcus colonization is a significant risk factor for superficial infection following GT. Further work into preoperative decolonization strategies may provide an avenue to decrease the high infection rate in this common pediatric procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Asunto(s)
Gastrostomía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Gastrostomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lactante , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Celulitis (Flemón)/prevención & control , Celulitis (Flemón)/etiología , Celulitis (Flemón)/epidemiología , Niño , Recién Nacido
2.
Br J Surg ; 111(1)2024 Jan 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37997932

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic venous anastomosis is associated with a low incidence of lower extremity lymphoedema-associated cellulitis; however, the exact relationship is unknown. This multicentre RCT evaluated the effect of lymphatic venous anastomosis on prevention of cellulitis. METHODS: Patients with secondary lower extremity lymphoedema who underwent at least 3 months of non-operative decongestive therapy were assigned randomly to lymphatic venous anastomosis or conservative therapy. The primary and secondary outcomes were cellulitis frequency, and assessments of circumference, hardness, and pain respectively. RESULTS: Overall, 336 patients were divided into two groups: 225 in the full-analysis set (primary outcome 225; secondary outcomes 170) and 156 in the per-protocol set (primary outcome 156; secondary outcomes 110). In both analyses, lymphatic venous anastomosis with non-operative decongestive therapy was more effective in preventing cellulitis than non-operative decongestive therapy alone; the difference between groups in reducing cellulitis frequency over 6 months was -0.35 (95 per cent c.i. -0.62 to -0.09; P = 0.010) in the full-analysis set (FAS) and -0.60 (-0.94 to -0.27; P = 0.001) in the per-protocol set (PPS) Limb circumference and pain were not significantly different, but lymphatic venous anastomosis reduced thigh area hardness (proximal medial and distal and lateral proximal). Four patients experienced contact dermatitis with non-operative decongestive therapy alone. CONCLUSION: Lymphatic venous anastomosis in combination with non-operative decongestive therapy prevents cellulitis. REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN00025137, UMIN00031462.


Asunto(s)
Vasos Linfáticos , Linfedema , Humanos , Celulitis (Flemón)/complicaciones , Celulitis (Flemón)/prevención & control , Vasos Linfáticos/cirugía , Linfedema/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Dolor
3.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 36(2): 95-101, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36853755

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recurrent cellulitis is a challenging clinical condition affecting up to 47% of patients after the first episode, especially those with predisposing risk factors. The purpose of this review is to describe the state of the art of literature evidence and to highlight recent developments in its management. RECENT FINDINGS: Recurrent cellulitis can occur after successful treatment of cellulitis. Conditions that commonly increase the risk of cellulitis include local and systemic modifiable and nonmodifiable factors. A rigorous approach to the management of risk factors and treatment of acute infection is important as the risk of recurrence rises with repeated episodes. Risk factors, if present, need to be targeted in association with antibiotic prophylaxis. Penicillin V is the preferred antibiotic for prevention but other antibiotics and new drugs can be considered in cases of ß-lactam allergy, intolerance, or failure. SUMMARY: Recurrent cellulitis is associated with short term and long-term morbidity as well as significant healthcare costs. Management of underlying predisposing conditions is crucial to prevent recurrence in addition with evaluation of pharmacological measures, but specialized and multidisciplinary skills are needed. More efforts are needed to prevent and treat this underestimated problem.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Celulitis (Flemón) , Humanos , Celulitis (Flemón)/tratamiento farmacológico , Celulitis (Flemón)/prevención & control , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Prevención Secundaria , Enfermedad Crónica , Recurrencia
5.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 148(5): 959-967, 2021 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34705770

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The association between textured surface breast implants and breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma has led to an increase in surgical procedures to exchange textured devices to smooth surface implants. Because patient satisfaction is an integral part of breast reconstruction, the purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes between smooth and textured implant recipients. METHODS: Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent implant-based postmastectomy breast reconstruction with either smooth or textured devices from 2009 to 2017 and completed the BREAST-Q patient-reported outcome measure following reconstruction were included in this analysis. The primary outcomes of interest were mean and median BREAST-Q scores and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Overall, 1077 patients were included-785 who underwent breast reconstruction with smooth implants and 292 who underwent breast reconstruction with textured implants. No statistical differences were observed between the textured and smooth implant groups for any of the BREAST-Q domain scores at any of the early (3-month) to late (2-year) postoperative time points. Smooth implant recipients reported significantly more rippling (p = 0.003) than textured implant recipients. In contrast, textured implant recipients had a higher rate of cellulitis than smooth implant recipients (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that postoperative satisfaction with breasts or health-related quality of life following immediate postmastectomy implant-based breast reconstruction is likely independent of implant surface type. However, smooth breast implants may result in more rippling. The authors' findings represent an important aid in counseling patients who have questions about the risks and benefits of replacing their textured implants with smooth surface devices. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Celulitis (Flemón)/epidemiología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Implantación de Mama/instrumentación , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Celulitis (Flemón)/etiología , Celulitis (Flemón)/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Calidad de Vida , Propiedades de Superficie , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Acta Med Port ; 34(3): 217-228, 2021 Mar 01.
Artículo en Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33971117

RESUMEN

Non-necrotizing acute dermo-hypodermal infections are infectious processes that include erysipela and infectious cellulitis, and are mainly caused by group A ß-haemolytic streptococcus. The lower limbs are affected in more than 80% of cases and the risk factors are disruption of cutaneous barrier, lymphoedema and obesity. Diagnosis is clinical and in a typical setting we observe an acute inflammatory plaque with fever, lymphangitis, adenopathy and leucocytosis. Bacteriology is usually not helpful because of low sensitivity or delayed positivity. In case of atypical presentations, erysipela must be distinguished from necrotizing fasciitis and acute vein thrombosis. Flucloxacillin and cefradine remain the first line of treatment. Recurrence is the main complication, so correct treatment of the risk factors is crucial.


As dermo-hipodermites bacterianas agudas não necrotizantes são processos infeciosos que incluem a erisipela e a celulite infeciosa, e são geralmente causadas por estreptococos ß­hemolíticos do grupo A. Em mais de 80% dos casos situam-se nos membros inferiores e são fatores predisponentes a existência de solução de continuidade na pele, o linfedema crónico e a obesidade. O seu diagnóstico é essencialmente clínico e o quadro típico baseia-se na presença de placa inflamatória associada a febre, linfangite, adenopatia e leucocitose. Os exames bacteriológicos têm baixa sensibilidade ou positividade tardia. Nos casos atípicos é importante o diagnóstico diferencial com a fasceíte necrotizante e a trombose venosa profunda. A flucloxacilina ou a cefradina são os fármacos de primeira linha. A recidiva constitui a complicação mais frequente, sendo fundamental o correto tratamento dos fatores de risco.


Asunto(s)
Celulitis (Flemón) , Erisipela , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Celulitis (Flemón)/diagnóstico , Celulitis (Flemón)/prevención & control , Celulitis (Flemón)/terapia , Cefradina/uso terapéutico , Erisipela/diagnóstico , Erisipela/prevención & control , Erisipela/terapia , Floxacilina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Recurrencia , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/terapia
9.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 74(1): 168-173, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32900654

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of infection and verrucous hyperkeratosis in patients who underwent surgery for advanced lymphedema according to the algorithm designed by the senior author, and were treated concurrently with/without toe treatment. A case series (Between 2004-2015) of 46 patients with unilateral advanced lower limb lymphedema was reviewed. Lymphoscintigraphy was used for evaluation of lymphedema severity. The ICG lymphography was used for staging. Fibrosis and skin induration were reflected by the tonicity. They were divided into two groups: (1) patients who underwent further treatment of toes according to the algorithm, and (2) patients who did not have toe-related treatment. Infection episodes and verrucous hyperkeratosis were recorded. There were 21 and 25 patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. All lymphoscintigrams showed severe dermal backflow with severe stagnation by 2.5 h after injection of Tc-99 colloid. All patients were stage IV or V. Tonicity values of skin were <60. Group 1 was reduced to an average of 0.6 episodes per year in the past year of follow-up, and Group 2 was reduced to an average of 1.5 episodes per year in the past year of follow-up (p <0.001). The average frequency of preoperative cellulitis was 3.6 episodes per year. The occurrence of verrucous hyperkeratosis was observed in 14.3% and 32% of Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The incidences of cellulitis and verrucous hyperkeratosis were significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p <0.001). To achieve successful control of infection, they should be treated carefully according to the strategy described above.


Asunto(s)
Celulitis (Flemón)/etiología , Queratosis/etiología , Linfedema/cirugía , Uñas/cirugía , Dedos del Pie/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Algoritmos , Celulitis (Flemón)/prevención & control , Femenino , Fibrosis , Humanos , Queratosis/prevención & control , Vasos Linfáticos/cirugía , Linfedema/complicaciones , Linfedema/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfografía , Linfocintigrafia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Piel/patología , Dedos del Pie/patología , Adulto Joven
12.
N Engl J Med ; 383(7): 630-639, 2020 08 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32786188

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic edema of the leg is a risk factor for cellulitis. Daily use of compression garments on the leg has been recommended to prevent the recurrence of cellulitis, but there is limited evidence from trials regarding its effectiveness. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, nonblinded trial, we assigned participants with chronic edema of the leg and recurrent cellulitis, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive leg compression therapy plus education on cellulitis prevention (compression group) or education alone (control group). Follow-up occurred every 6 months for up to 3 years or until 45 episodes of cellulitis had occurred in the trial. The primary outcome was the recurrence of cellulitis. Participants in the control group who had an episode of cellulitis crossed over to the compression group. Secondary outcomes included cellulitis-related hospital admission and quality-of-life assessments. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients were screened, and 84 were enrolled; 41 participants were assigned to the compression group, and 43 to the control group. At the time of a planned interim analysis, when 23 episodes of cellulitis had occurred, 6 participants (15%) in the compression group and 17 (40%) in the control group had had an episode of cellulitis (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09 to 0.59; P = 0.002; relative risk [post hoc analysis], 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.84; P = 0.02), and the trial was stopped for efficacy. A total of 3 participants (7%) in the compression group and 6 (14%) in the control group were hospitalized for cellulitis (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.09 to 1.59). Most quality-of-life outcomes did not differ between the two groups. No adverse events occurred during the trial. CONCLUSIONS: In this small, single-center, nonblinded trial involving patients with chronic edema of the leg and cellulitis, compression therapy resulted in a lower incidence of recurrence of cellulitis than conservative treatment. (Funded by Calvary Public Hospital Bruce; Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12617000412336.).


Asunto(s)
Celulitis (Flemón)/prevención & control , Vendajes de Compresión , Edema/complicaciones , Anciano , Celulitis (Flemón)/epidemiología , Celulitis (Flemón)/etiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Edema/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Pierna , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Calidad de Vida , Prevención Secundaria/métodos
14.
BMJ Open ; 9(8): e029225, 2019 08 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31420389

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cellulitis represents a significant burden to patients' quality of life (QOL) and cost to the healthcare system, especially due to its recurrent nature. Chronic oedema is a strong risk factor for both an initial episode of cellulitis and cellulitis recurrence. Expert consensus advises compression therapy to prevent cellulitis recurrence in individuals with chronic oedema, however, there is little supporting evidence. This research aims to determine if the management of chronic oedema using compression therapy effectively delays the recurrence of lower limb cellulitis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised controlled trial with cross-over will be used to assess the impact of compression therapy on clinical outcomes (time to next episode of cellulitis, rate of cellulitis-related hospital presentations, QOL and leg volume). Using concealed allocation, 162 participants will be randomised into the intervention (compression) or control (no compression) group. Randomisation will be stratified by prophylactic antibiotic use. Participants will be followed up at 6 monthly intervals for up to 3 years or until 45 episodes of cellulitis occur across the cohort. Following an episode of recurrent cellulitis, control group participants will cross-over to the intervention group. Survival analysis will be undertaken to assess the primary outcome measure of time to cellulitis recurrence. The hypotheses are that compression therapy to control lower limb chronic oedema will delay recurrent lower limb cellulitis, reduce the rate of associated hospitalisations, minimise affected limb volume and improve the QOL of this population. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from the ethics committees of all relevant institutions. Results will be disseminated through relevant peer-reviewed journal articles and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617000412336; Pre-results. The ICTOC trial is currently in progress. Participant recruitment started in May 2017 and is expected to continue until December 2019.


Asunto(s)
Vendajes , Celulitis (Flemón)/etiología , Celulitis (Flemón)/prevención & control , Edema/complicaciones , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Cruzados , Humanos , Pierna , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proyectos de Investigación
15.
Am J Perinatol ; 36(9): 886-890, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30780190

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Adding azithromycin to standard antibiotic prophylaxis for unscheduled cesarean delivery has been shown to reduce postcesarean infections. Because wound infection with ureaplasmas may not be overtly purulent, we assessed the hypothesis that azithromycin-based extended-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis also reduces wound complications that are identified as noninfectious. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of the C/SOAP (Cesarean Section Optimal Antibiotic Prophylaxis) randomized controlled trial, which enrolled women with singleton pregnancies ≥24 weeks who were undergoing nonelective cesarean. Women were randomized to adjunctive azithromycin or identical placebo up to 1 hour preincision. All wound complications occurring within 6 weeks were adjudicated into infection and noninfectious wound complications (seroma, hematoma, local cellulitis, and other noninfectious wound breakdown). The primary outcome for this analysis is the composite of noninfectious wound complications. RESULTS: At a total of 14 sites, 2,013 women were randomized to adjunctive azithromycin (n = 1,019) or placebo (n = 994). Groups were similar at baseline. Although there was a lower rate of noninfectious wound complications in the azithromycin group compared with placebo (2.9 vs. 3.8%), this was not statistically significant (p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: While adding azithromycin to usual antibiotic prophylaxis for nonelective cesarean delivery does reduce the risk of postcesarean infections, it did not significantly reduce the risk of postcesarean noninfectious wound complications.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Adulto , Celulitis (Flemón)/etiología , Celulitis (Flemón)/prevención & control , Femenino , Hematoma/etiología , Hematoma/prevención & control , Humanos , Embarazo , Riesgo , Seroma/etiología , Seroma/prevención & control
16.
J Robot Surg ; 13(1): 1-8, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29730734

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lymphadenectomy represents the standard treatment for various types of cancer. The introduction of robotics in lymph node dissection may have an important impact on post-lymphadenectomy complications. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed. RESULTS: In our review, robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy was performed on 51 patients. Penile squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histological type of the primary neoplasia. No intra-operative complications were reported. One case of conversion to open was reported. The mean duration of hospitalization was 2 days. The duration of drainage ranged from 7 to 72 days. The most common postoperative complications were lymphocele (13.7%), lymphedema (7.8%), cellulitis (7.8%), seroma (3.9%), abscess (3.9%), wound breakdown/wound infection (3.9%), sepsis (1.9%), prolonged lymphorrhea (1 out of 51 patients, 1.9%) and skin necrosis (1 out of 51 patients, 1.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Until now there has not been sufficient evidence regarding the role of robotics in groin lymph node dissection, though this approach appears to be safe and oncologically effective, with morbidity rates relatively lower compared to open surgery.


Asunto(s)
Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Celulitis (Flemón)/epidemiología , Celulitis (Flemón)/prevención & control , Bases de Datos Bibliográficas , Femenino , Ingle , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación , Linfedema/epidemiología , Linfedema/prevención & control , Linfocele/epidemiología , Linfocele/prevención & control , Masculino , Neoplasias del Pene/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 15(4): 995-1002, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30513266

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Recommendations regarding the need to use alcohol prior to vaccine injections are inconsistent and based on low-level evidence. The objective was to assess the effectiveness of alcohol in reducing local skin reactions and infection post-vaccination. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial in a pediatric clinic. A research assistant cleansed the skin with alcohol at (swab group) or adjacent to (control group) the pre-defined injection site(s). Clinicians, parents and children were blinded to group allocation. Parents reported local skin reactions using paper diaries for 15 days post-vaccination (Day 0-14). Telephone interviews were conducted Day 1, 5, and 14. The Brighton Collaboration criteria were used to diagnose cellulitis and infectious abscess Day 5 and afterward. RESULTS: 170 children participated (May-November 2017). Baseline characteristics did not differ (p > 0.05) between groups. Children received 1-4 separate injections. There were no differences between swab and control groups in the incidence of any local skin reactions (58% vs. 54%), and specifically, pain (45% vs. 40%), redness (26% vs. 21%), swelling (20% vs. 13%), warmth (19% vs. 27%), and spontaneous drainage of pus (0% in both groups) over the post-vaccination follow-up period. Day 5 data was available for 99% of participants from diaries and telephone surveys; there were no cases of cellulitis or infectious abscess. CONCLUSION: These findings are the first direct evidence for vaccine injections demonstrating that cleansing the skin with alcohol may not be needed. Our study is underpowered; however, to detect a difference in incidence of skin infection, future research is recommended.


Asunto(s)
Absceso/prevención & control , Alcoholes/farmacología , Celulitis (Flemón)/prevención & control , Detergentes/farmacología , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Absceso/etiología , Celulitis (Flemón)/etiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Vacunación/métodos , Vacunas/administración & dosificación
18.
J Pediatr Surg ; 53(6): 1226-1229, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29627175

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Our previously published data suggested several risk factors for infection after the Nuss procedure. We aimed to further elucidate these findings. METHODS: An IRB-approved (14-03-WC-0034), single institution, retrospective review was performed to evaluate the incidence of postoperative Nuss bar infections associated with seven variables. These were subjected to bivariate and multivariable analyses. A broad definition of infection was used including cellulitis, superficial infection with drainage, or deep infection occurring at any time postoperatively. RESULTS: Over 7years (4/1/2009-7/31/2016), 25 (3.2%) of 781 patients developed a postoperative infection after primary Nuss repair. Multivariable analyses demonstrated an increased risk of infection with perioperative clindamycin versus cefazolin for all infections (AOR 3.72, p=.017), and specifically deep infections (AOR 5.72, p=.004). The risk of a superficial infection was increased when antibiotic infusion completed >60min prior to incision (AOR 10.4, p=.044) and with the use of peri-incisional subcutaneous catheters (OR 8.98, p=.008). CONCLUSION: Following primary Nuss repair, the rate of deep bar infection increased with the use of perioperative clindamycin rather than cefazolin. The rate of superficial infection increased when perioperative antibiotic infusion was completed more than 60min prior to incision and with the use of peri-incisional subcutaneous catheters. Further studies are needed to better understand these findings. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective chart review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III treatment study.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Tórax en Embudo/cirugía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Cefazolina/uso terapéutico , Celulitis (Flemón)/epidemiología , Celulitis (Flemón)/prevención & control , Clindamicina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Incidencia , Análisis Multivariante , Dispositivos de Fijación Ortopédica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Ann Intern Med ; 168(3): ITC17-ITC32, 2018 Feb 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29404597

RESUMEN

Cellulitis and soft tissue infections are a diverse group of diseases that range from uncomplicated cellulitis to necrotizing fasciitis. Management of predisposing conditions is the primary means of prevention. Cellulitis is a clinical diagnosis and thus is made on the basis of history and physical examination. Imaging may be helpful for characterizing purulent soft tissue infections and associated osteomyelitis. Treatment varies according to the type of infection. The foundations of treatment are drainage of purulence and antibiotics, the latter targeted at the infection's most likely cause.


Asunto(s)
Celulitis (Flemón)/diagnóstico , Celulitis (Flemón)/prevención & control , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/prevención & control , Animales , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Mordeduras y Picaduras/complicaciones , Mordeduras y Picaduras/microbiología , Celulitis (Flemón)/microbiología , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Anamnesis , Examen Físico , Derivación y Consulta , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/microbiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control
20.
Br J Dermatol ; 178(5): 1028-1034, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29222939

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is an emerging need to develop consistent outcomes in clinical trials to allow effective comparison of treatment effects. No systematic review has previously looked at the reporting of outcome measures used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment and prevention of cellulitis (erysipelas). OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this review was to describe the breadth of outcomes reported from RCTs on cellulitis treatment and prevention. The secondary aim was to identify outcome themes from patients' and healthcare professionals' feedback from a cellulitis Priority Setting Partnership (PSP). METHODS: We conducted a review of all outcome measures used in RCTs from two recent Cochrane reviews. Free-text responses from a cellulitis priority setting survey were used to understand the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals. RESULTS: Outcomes from 42 RCTs on treatment of cellulitis and six RCTs on prevention of cellulitis were reviewed. Only 28 trials stated their primary outcome. For trials assessing treatment of cellulitis, clinical response to treatment was categorized in 25 different ways. Five of these trials used an outcome that was in accordance with FDA guidance and only four trials incorporated either quality of life or patient satisfaction. For trials assessing prevention of cellulitis, recurrence was the key outcome measure. From the cellulitis PSP, prevention of recurrence, clinical features and long-term disease impact were the most important outcome themes for patients. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that in cellulitis treatment and prevention research, there is significant heterogeneity in clinical outcomes, inadequate focus on patient-reported outcomes, and a disparity between what is currently measured and what patients and healthcare professionals feel is important. We recommend that future cellulitis treatment trials consider the use of longer-term outcomes to capture recurrence and long-term morbidity, as well as short-term resolution of acute infection.


Asunto(s)
Celulitis (Flemón)/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Celulitis (Flemón)/prevención & control , Humanos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Investigación , Enfermedades Cutáneas Infecciosas/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...