Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros












Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Radiol ; 97(1155): 553-559, 2024 Feb 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265293

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of microwave ablation (MWA) on pain relief, quality of life, mobility, and local tumour progression in adult patients with pelvic osteolytic bone metastasis and to test the safety of MWA. METHODS: This study retrospectively analysed the data from 20 patients with pelvic osteolytic metastases who received MWA combined with percutaneous osteoplasty (POP). The visual analogue scale (VAS), musculoskeletal tumour society system (MSTS), and Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bone Metastases 22 (QLQ-BM22) were used to evaluate the pain, limb function, and quality of life. The intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. The tumour recurrence and survival time were analysed during the follow-up period (range 3-26 months). RESULTS: All (n = 20) MWA and POP operations were completed successfully. Four patients (20%; 95% CI, 6%-44%) had mild bone cement leakage from surrounding tissues, and there were no obvious symptoms or serious complications. There were significant differences in VAS, MSTS, and QLQ-BM22 scores before and after the operation (P < .001). During the postoperative follow-up period, 9 patients died. The median survival time was 8 months (range 3-26 months; IQR: 4.5-13; 95% CI, 4.2-15.3 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 65% (13/20; 95% CI, 41%-85%). Tumour recurrence occurred in 4 cases (20%; 95% CI, 6%-44%) after the operation, and the median time of recurrence was 12 months (range 8-16 months; IQR: 8.25-12.75; 95% CI, 5.5-18.5 months). CONCLUSIONS: MWA combined with POP is an effective and safe treatment for pelvic osteolytic metastases. It can significantly relieve local pain, reconstruct limb function, improve patients' quality of life, and effectively control local tumour progression. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: So far, the experience of using microwave in the treatment of pelvic metastases is still limited. MWA combined with POP in the treatment of pelvic osteolytic metastases can provide significant clinical benefits in acceptable low-risk minimally invasive situations and should be provided to patients with appropriate pelvic metastases in a multidisciplinary approach.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Ablación por Catéter , Cementoplastia , Adulto , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Microondas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dolor/etiología , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Cementoplastia/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos
2.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 29(4): 372-385, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38217754

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of publications to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) plus percutaneous cementoplasty (PCP) (PTA + PCP) for painful bone metastases. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase for articles published up to October 2022. Outcomes were a 10-point pain scale, morphine equivalents daily dose (MEDD) and complications. A subgroup confined to spinal bone metastases was analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-one articles were selected for the analysis. The 21 selected articles involved a total of 661 cases. The pooled pain scales at pre-PTA + PCP, 1 day, 1 week and 1-, 3-, and 6 months post-PTA + PCP were 7.60 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.26-7.95, I2 = 89%), 3.30 (95% CI, 2.25-4.82, I2 = 98%), 2.58 (95% CI, 1.99-3.35, I2 = 94%), 2.02 (95% CI, 1.50-2.71, I2 = 93%), 1.78 (95% CI, 1.26-2.53, I2 = 95%), and 1.62 (95% CI, 1.14-2.31, I2 = 88%), and in the subgroup, 7.97 (95% CI, 7.45-8.52, I2 = 86%), 3.01 (95% CI, 1.43-6.33, I2 = 98%), 2.95 (95% CI, 1.93-4.51, I2 = 95%), 2.34 (95% CI, 1.82-3.01, I2 = 68%), 2.18 (95% CI, 1.57-3.03, I2 = 78%), and 2.01 (95% CI, 1.16-3.48, I2 = 86%). Mean MEDD decreased up to 3 months post-PTA + PCP in 4 articles. The overall pooled major complication rate was 4% (95% CI, 2-6%, I2 = 2%). CONCLUSIONS: The updated systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that PTA + PCP for painful bone metastases is safe, and can lead to rapid and sustained pain reduction.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Cementoplastia , Humanos , Cementoplastia/métodos , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor en Cáncer/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Terapia Combinada , Dimensión del Dolor
3.
Dolor ; 32(75): 16-22, nov. 2022.
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1443146

RESUMEN

Objetivo: El dolor óseo por cáncer óseo o metástasis es un dolor de difícil manejo asociado a dolor incidental. Hay distintas estrategias quirúrgicas para su tratamiento, sin embargo, no todos los pacientes con metástasis óseas pueden beneficiarse de un tratamiento quirúrgico. La presente revisión bibliográfica tiene como objetivo identificar terapias intervencionales mínimamente invasivas para el control del dolor por metástasis óseas. Métodos: Revisión bibliográfica acerca de terapias intervencionales para el control del dolor por metástasis óseas utilizando la base de datos PubMed (www.pubmed.gov) y el motor de búsqueda Google (www.google.cl). Tipos de participantes: Pacientes con metástasis óseas dolorosas de cualquier tumor primario. Tipos de intervenciones: Bloqueos anestésicos, bloqueos neurolíticos, terapias ablativas, cementoplastías. Resultados: Se obtuvieron 384 resultados que incluyeron revisiones sistemáticas, revisiones bibliográficas, ensayos clínicos controlados, series de casos y reporte de casos. Todos los artículos relevantes en inglés y español se incluyeron para su análisis. Conclusión: Las metástasis óseas son un evento común en los pacientes con cáncer, y el dolor óseo es un dolor de difícil manejo asociado a dolor incidental. Se han desarrollado terapias intervencionales no invasivas o mínimamente invasivas para tratar el dolor, mejorar la calidad de vida y la funcionalidad, disminuir el consumo de fármacos, y reducir el tamaño del tumor. La gran mayoría ha demostrado ser terapias seguras y eficaces, con pocos eventos adversos y de rápida resolución, y que si son combinadas mejoran los resultados.


Objective: Bone pain from bone cancer or metastasis is a pain that is difficult to manage associated with incidental pain. There are different surgical strategies for its treatment, however, not all patients with bone metastases can benefit from a surgical treatment. This literature review aims to identify minimally invasive interventional therapies for the control of pain due to bone metastasis. Methods: Literature review of interventional therapies for the control of pain due to bone metastases was done using the PubMed database (www.pubmed.gov) and the Google search engine (www.google.cl). Types of participants: Patients with painful bone metastases from any primary tumor. Types of interventions: Anesthetic blocks, neurolytic blocks, ablative therapies, cementoplasties. Results: We obtained 384 results that included systematic reviews, literature reviews, controlled clinical trials, case series and case reports. All relevant articles in English and Spanish were included for analysis. Conclusion: Bone metastases are a common event in cancer patients, and bone pain is a difficult-to-manage pain associated with incidental pain. Non-invasive or minimally invasive interventional therapies have been developed to treat pain, improve quality of life and functionality, decrease drug use, and reduce tumor size. The vast majority therapies have been shown to be safe and effective ones, with few adverse events and rapid resolution, and that if combined they improve the outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Dolor en Cáncer/terapia , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/terapia , Desnervación , Técnicas de Ablación , Cementoplastia
4.
Clinics ; 74: e346, 2019. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1011920

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw augmented with polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic spinal surgery. METHODS: This study included 128 patients with osteoporosis (BMD T-score −3.2±1.9; range, −5.4 to -2.5) who underwent spinal decompression and instrumentation with a polymethylmethacrylate-augmented bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw. Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale scores and the Oswestry Disability Index were compared with preoperative values. Postoperative plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans were performed immediately after surgery; at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months; and annually thereafter. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 42.4±13.4 months (range, 23 to 71 months). A total of 418 polymethylmethacrylate-augmented bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screws were used. Cement extravasations were detected in 27 bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screws (6.46%), mainly in cases of vertebral fracture, without any clinical sequela. The postoperative low back and lower limb Visual Analogue Scale scores were significantly reduced compared with the preoperative scores (<0.01), and similar results were noted for the Oswestry Disability Index score (p<0.01). No significant screw migration was noted at the final follow-up relative to immediately after surgery (p<0.01). All cases achieved successful bone fusion, and no case required revision. No infection or blood clots occurred after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The polymethylmethacrylate-augmented bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw is safe and effective for use in osteoporotic patients who require spinal instrumentation.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Polimetil Metacrilato/uso terapéutico , Cementoplastia/métodos , Tornillos Pediculares/efectos adversos , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen
5.
Rev. cuba. med. mil ; 45(4): 1-8, set.-dic. 2016. ilus, tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-960560

RESUMEN

Introducción: la reconstrucción de defectos de la bóveda craneana constituye un reto para el cirujano. Durante las últimas décadas, muchas han sido las variantes quirúrgicas para su aplicación, así como los materiales utilizados para ello. Objetivo: mostrar los resultados en la realización de craneoplastias con el uso de cemento Genta 1 en pacientes con defecto óseo del cráneo, secundario a traumatismo craneoencefálico. Métodos: se realizó un estudio de serie de casos que abarca desde el año 2009 hasta septiembre de 2014 a 20 pacientes con traumatismo craneoencefálico que les dejó como secuela un defecto óseo del cráneo, requiriendo posteriormente de craneoplastia. Resultados: predominó en el adulto joven y el sexo masculino. En cuanto al diámetro del defecto, predominó el pequeño, seguido de los medianos. En relación con la topografía, prevalecieron los frontales derechos. Predominó la modalidad de abordaje tardío de la craneoplastia luego de la aparición del defecto. Las principales complicaciones fueron el hematoma subgaleal y la deformidad cosmética residual. Conclusiones: la mayoría de los defectos tratados fueron pequeños y medianos, localizados en la región frontal derecha, la modalidad de abordaje más empleada fue la tardía y existió un mínimo de complicaciones(AU)


Introduction: The reconstruction of defects of the cranial cavity constitutes a surgical challenge. Many have been the surgical variants for its application during the last decades, as well as the material used for it. Objectives: To evaluate the results in craneoplasty realized with cement Genta 1 in patients with osseous defect secondary to cranial injury. Methods: It was done a descriptive, retrospective and longitudinal study extended from 2009 to 2014 in 20 patients with cranial injury that left them as consequence an skull's osseous defect which needed subsequent craneoplasty. Results: The injuries predominated in young adults and male sex. Small defects were the more frequent, followed by middle sized and only a large one. In relation with topography, they prevailed in right frontal region of the skull. The belated approach was the most used treatment adopted for the craneoplasty. Subgaleal haematoma and the residual cosmetic deformity were the main complications. Conclusions: Majority of cranial defects were small and middle sized, topographycally situated on the right frontal region and the belated approach was the most frequent treatment adopted for the craneoplasty(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Cementoplastia/métodos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/cirugía , Craneotomía/métodos
6.
Medwave ; 12(1)ene. 2012.
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: lil-714134

RESUMEN

La cementoplastía en aplastamientos o fracturas vertebrales es un proceder que se utiliza con mayor frecuencia en la sociedad moderna, basado en la inyección percutánea de polimetil-metacrilato. El objetivo de este artículo es presentar una experiencia de nuevo abordaje en el tratamiento del dolor oncológico; en este caso por metástasis en el cuerpo vertebral de S2, a partir de un cáncer de próstata, que refería un dolor incapacitante. Creemos que el proceder fue novedoso y que existen pocos casos reportados en la bibliografía mundial sobre la sacroplastia.


The cementoplasty in squashing or vertebral fractures is an action that is utilized with high frequency in the modern society, based in the percutaneous injection of polimetil-metacrylate. The objective of this presentation is to show you an experience to a new perspective in the treatment of the cancer pain; In this case for metastasis in S2's vertebral body, from a prostate cancer, that presented a crippling pain. That is why we thought the way it was conducted was innovative and there are few cases that have been reported in the worldwide bibliography on the sacroplasty.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Cementoplastia , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Sacro/patología , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Dolor/etiología , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Polimetil Metacrilato/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...