RESUMEN
Fracture Liaison Service is a coordinator-based model effective in addressing the fragility fracture care gap. This study found that the service was feasible in Malaysia and could improve the delivery of secondary fracture prevention. Local adaptations and reactive responses addressed challenges, enhancing feasibility. PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of a Fracture Liaison Service in Malaysia and to benchmark our service against the International Osteoporosis Foundation Best Practice Framework. METHODS: This feasibility study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Malaysia from March 2021 to March 2022. Patients aged ≥ 50 years admitted with fragility fractures were recruited. Excluded were those with poor prognosis or transferred out from the hospital during admission. Patients were screened, assessed, and followed up at months 4 and 12 post-fracture presentations. Data was collected using Microsoft Excel and the REDCap database. The feasibility of the Fracture Liaison Service was evaluated using the typology of feasibility. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients (female (93/140, 66.4%), median age 77 (IQR 72, 83), hip fractures (100/140, 65.8%)) were recruited into the Fracture Liaison Service. The recruitment rate was (140/215, 65.1%), as some patients were "missed" due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The completion rate was high (101/114, 88.6%). Among those indicated for antiosteoporosis medication, 82/100 (82%) were initiated on treatment. Various "Best Practice Standards," such as patient evaluation (140/140, 100%), fall prevention (130/140, 92.9%), and medication review standards (15/15, 100%) were high. Complicated referral pathways, inexperienced staff, lack of resources, and communication issues were some of the barriers identified while implementing the Fracture Liaison Service. Challenges were overcome by modifying the service workflow and coordinating with different departments. CONCLUSION: The Fracture Liaison Service was found to be feasible in Malaysia. It demonstrated promise in improving bone health management; however, several changes were needed to adapt the service to suit our environment.
Asunto(s)
Estudios de Factibilidad , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Prevención Secundaria , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Malasia/epidemiología , Femenino , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Masculino , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prevención Secundaria/organización & administración , Fracturas de Cadera , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/epidemiología , OsteoporosisRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rapid response teams (RRTs) help in the early recognition of deteriorating patients in hospital wards and provide the needed management at the bedside by a qualified team. RRT implementation is still questionable because there is insufficient evidence regarding its effects. To date, according to our knowledge, no published studies have addressed the effectiveness of RRT implementation on inpatient care outcomes in Egypt. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the impact of an RRT on the rates of inpatient mortality, cardiopulmonary arrest calls and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission in an Egyptian tertiary hospital. METHODS: An interventional study was conducted at a university hospital. Data was evaluated for 24 months before the intervention (January 2018 till December 2019, which included 4242 admissions). The intervention was implemented for 12 months (January 2021 till December 2021), ending with postintervention evaluation of 2338 admissions. RESULTS: RRT implementation was associated with a significant reduction in inpatient mortality rate from 88.93 to 46.44 deaths per 1000 discharges (relative risk reduction (RRR)=0.48; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.58). Inpatient cardiopulmonary arrest rate decreased from 7.41 to 1.77 calls per 1000 discharges (RRR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.92), while unplanned ICU admissions decreased from 5.98 to 4.87 per 1000 discharges (RRR, 0.19; 95% CI, -0.65 to 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: RRT implementation was associated with a significantly reduced hospital inpatient mortality rate, cardiopulmonary arrest call rate as well as reduced unplanned ICU admission rate. Our results reveal that RRT can contribute to improving the quality of care in similar settings in developing countries.
Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Equipo Hospitalario de Respuesta Rápida , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Egipto , Equipo Hospitalario de Respuesta Rápida/estadística & datos numéricos , Equipo Hospitalario de Respuesta Rápida/normas , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidadRESUMEN
Background: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a fatal complication of ascites fluid infection. The causes of SBP in children differ from those in adults, and these bacteria are frequently resistant to antibiotics. Therefore, this study investigated the clinical findings, bacterial etiology, and antimicrobial resistance in children with SBP. Methods: This study was conducted on all new pediatric ascites patients, who were admitted to the Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Namazi Hospital, affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Shiraz, Iran) from 2021 to 2022. Required data such as demographic information, and clinical information such as complete blood count (CBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Gram staining, blood culture by Automated Blood Culture System (BACTEC), and antibiogram of ascites fluids by disc diffusion method were all collected. Finally, the data were statistically analyzed using SPSS Software (version 26). Besides, the t test, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney, and Chi square tests were used for data analysis. In all tests, P≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The present study examined 62 children with ascites of which 18 (29%) had SBP. The median (IQR) age was 2.5 (8.1) years. Thirty-four (54.8%) of the participants were girls. Abdominal pain was the most common clinical manifestation in patients (54%), and there was a significant association between abdominal pain and SBP (P=0.02). In 12 positive ascites fluid cultures, coagulase-negative staphylococci had the highest frequency (25%), followed by Escherichia coli (16.7%). Third-generation cephalosporins had a 25% sensitivity in the total positive cultures. This sensitivity was 33.3% for Gram-negative cultures and 16.6% for Gram-positive cultures. Conclusion: Although third-generation cephalosporins are recommended as the primary antibiotic for the empirical treatment of SBP, the present study found high bacterial resistance. Finally, empirical therapy should be tailored to each region's bacterial resistance features.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Peritonitis , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Peritonitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Peritonitis/microbiología , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Irán , Preescolar , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Lactante , Adolescente , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/efectos de los fármacos , Ascitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
With the introduction of the novel coronavirus in late 2019, the healthcare system of every country in the world experienced many challenges. In India, every healthcare organization has prepared itself to fight against these global challenges. This study aims to describe the challenges faced during the COVID-19 pandemic and how we dealt with the pandemic successfully. This narrative analysis study was made in a 960-bedded teaching hospital during the pandemic. The challenges were identified from the minutes of meetings, circulars issued, and various strategic decisions made to combat the pandemic. The challenges faced by the institute were categorized into nine different categories: infrastructural, human resource, hospital operations, and others. Lack of knowledge during the initial days of the pandemic, need for round-theclock situational management, and day-to-day operation needed aggressive training and adherence to the guidelines. Gaps identified in areas like inventory, infection control, logistics, etc., were quickly addressed, and processes were created as per the nation's changing guidelines. This study revealed strategies to manage the pandemic by optimally utilizing available resources with good teamwork and situational leadership.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Centros de Atención Terciaria , India/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias , Hospitales de Enseñanza/organización & administración , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Control de Infecciones/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cancer care has evolved rapidly, increasing the demand on healthcare resources. While many non-oral cancer treatments are administered in the hospital, not all necessitate complex medical care. Treatments that can be administered subcutaneously, intramuscularly, or as short intravenous infusions with a low risk of extravasation can be safely administered in the community. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since 2017, the National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS) has operated a program called NCIS on-the-go (NOTG) comprising a network of community cancer treatment clinics located within 20 km of the hospital. NOTG provides 17 low-risk treatments and nursing services run by oncology-trained nurses without on-site physicians. Patients who receive their first dose of cancer treatment uneventfully in the cancer centre can opt-in to receive subsequent doses at any NOTG clinic. RESULTS: Treatment at NOTG has become more mainstream over the years, with its workload increasing by over sevenfold since 2017, and is now responsible for â¼10% of the total main cancer centre workload. The program is sustainable and financially viable to operate. A survey of 155 patients revealed a 96.8% user satisfaction rate, with the majority reporting tangible savings in travelling time, waiting time, and travelling costs. The diversion of low-risk treatments to NOTG has indirectly increased capacity and reduced waiting times at the main cancer centre for patients requiring complex cancer treatments, resulting in a win-win situation. CONCLUSIONS: NOTG represents an innovative model of care to deliver low-risk cancer treatments safely in the community and can be easily replicated in other countries.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Singapur , Neoplasias/terapia , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud , Instituciones Oncológicas/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among admitted neonates. Healthcare-associated infection (HAI) is a significant contributor in this cohort. LOCAL PROBLEM: In our unit, 16.1% of the admissions developed sepsis during their stay in the unit. METHOD: We formed a team of all stakeholders to address the issue. The problem was analysed using various tools, and the main contributing factor was low compliance with hand hygiene and handling of intravenous lines. INTERVENTIONS: The scrub the hub/aseptic non-touch technique/five moments of hand hygiene/hand hygiene (S-A-F-H) protocol was formulated as a quality improvement initiative, and various interventions were done to ensure compliance with hand hygiene, five moments of hand hygiene, aseptic non-touch technique. The data were collected and analysed regularly with the team members, and actions were planned accordingly. RESULTS: Over a few months, the team could reduce the incidence of HAI by 50%, which has been sustained for over a year. The improvement in compliance with the various aspects of S-A-F-H increased. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with hand hygiene steps, five moments of hand hygiene and an aseptic non-touch technique using quality improvement methodology led to a reduction in neonatal sepsis incidence in the unit. Regular reinforcement is required to maintain awareness of asepsis practices and implementation in day-to-day care and to bring about behavioural changes.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Higiene de las Manos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Sepsis Neonatal , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Sepsis Neonatal/prevención & control , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Higiene de las Manos/métodos , Higiene de las Manos/normas , Higiene de las Manos/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/normas , FemeninoRESUMEN
Objectives: This study aimed to determine the rate and severity patterns of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and identify antenatal and postnatal factors associated with BPD in preterm infants <32 weeks of gestational age (GA). Methods: This retrospective observational study included preterm neonates <32 weeks of gestation admitted into the neonatal intensive care unit between January 2010 and December 2017 at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman. A data set of antenatal and perinatal factors were collected. BPD was defined as the need for oxygen and/or respiratory support at 36 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA). Infants with and without BPD were compared in their antenatal and perinatal factors. Results: A total of 589 preterm infants <32 weeks were admitted. Among them, 505 (85.7%) survived to 36 weeks' PMA and 90 (17.8%) had BPD. The combined BPD and mortality rate was 28.4%. Grades 1, 2 and 3 BPD constituted 77.8%, 7.8% and 14.4%, respectively. BPD was associated with lower GA, lower birth weight, need for intubation at resuscitation, lower Apgar scores, longer duration of ventilation, surfactant therapy and higher rates of neonatal morbidities. On binary logistic regression analysis, predictors of BPD were longer duration of ventilation, intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) and necrotising enterocolitis (NEC). Conclusion: In an Omani centre, 17.8% of preterm infants (<32 weeks GA) developed BPD. Various perinatal and neonatal factors were associated with BPD. However, longer duration of ventilation, IVH grades 1 and 2 and NEC stages II and III were significant predictors. Future multicentre research is necessary to provide the overall prevalence of BPD in Oman to help optimise the resources for BPD prevention and management in preterm infants.
Asunto(s)
Displasia Broncopulmonar , Edad Gestacional , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Humanos , Omán/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Displasia Broncopulmonar/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Prevalencia , Masculino , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/organización & administración , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Embarazo , LactanteRESUMEN
Objective: This study sought to assess the impact of a novel electronic audit and feedback (e-A&F) system on patient outcomes. Methods: The e-A&F intervention was implemented in a tertiary hospital and involved near real-time feedback via web-based dashboards. We used a segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series. We modelled the pre-post change in outcomes for the (1) announcement of this priority list, and (2) implementation of the e-A&F intervention to have affected patient outcomes. Results: Across the study period there were 222,792 episodes of inpatient care, of which 13,904 episodes were found to contain one or more HACs, a risk of 6.24%. From the point of the first intervention until the end of the study the overall risk of a HAC reduced from 8.57% to 4.12% - a 51.93% reduction. Of this reduction the proportion attributed to each of these interventions was found to be 29.99% for the announcement of the priority list and 21.93% for the implementation of the e-A&F intervention. Discussion: Our findings lend evidence to a mechanism that the announcement of a measurement framework, at a national level, can lead to local strategies, such as e-A&F, that lead to significant continued improvements over time.
Asunto(s)
Retroalimentación , Seguridad del Paciente , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Longitudinales , Auditoría Médica/métodos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido/métodosRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increased number of hospitalized COVID-19-positive patients suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this research study was to explore factors associated with the length of hospitalization of patients with T2DM and the mild form of COVID-19. Material and Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved all patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and those who were treated in the dedicated COVID-19 department of the University Clinical Center (UCC) in Nis between 10 September 2021 and 31 December 2021. Upon admission, patients underwent blood tests for biochemical analysis, including blood count, kidney and liver function parameters (C-reactive protein (CRP), creatinine kinase, and D-dimer), and glycemia and HbA1c assessments. Additionally, all patients underwent lung radiography. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were employed to assess the impact of specific factors on the length of hospitalization among patients with T2DM. Results: Out of a total of 549 treated COVID-19-positive patients, 124 (21.0%) had T2DM, while 470 (79.0%) did not have diabetes. Among patients with T2DM, men were significantly younger than women (60.6 ± 16.8 vs. 64.2 ± 15.3, p < 0.01). The average hospitalization length of patients with diabetes was 20.2 ± 9.6 (5 to 54 days), and it was significantly longer than for patients without diabetes, at 15.0 ± 3.4, which ranged from 3 days to 39 (t-test ≈ 5.86, p < 0.05). According to the results of the univariate regression analysis, each year of age is associated with an increase in the length of hospital stay of 0.06 days (95% CI: 0.024 to 0.128, p = 0.004). Patients who received oxygen therapy were treated for 2.8 days longer than those who did not receive oxygen treatment (95% CI: 0.687 to 4988, p = 0.010), and each one-unit increase in CRP level was associated with a 0.02-day reduction in the length of hospitalization (95% CI: 0.004 to 0.029, p = 0.008). Based on the results of the multivariate regression analysis, each year of age is associated with an increase in the length of hospitalization by 0.07 days (95% CI: 0.022 to 0.110, p = 0.003). Patients who received oxygen therapy were treated for 3.2 days longer than those who did not receive oxygen therapy (95% CI: 0.653 to 5726, p = 0.014), and each unit increase in CRP level was associated with a 0.02-day reduction in the length of hospitalization (95% CI: 0.005 to 0.028, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Based on the presented results, COVID-19-positive patients with diabetes had, on average, longer hospitalizations than COVID-19 patients without diabetes. The hospital treatment of patients with T2DM and a milder form of COVID-19 was associated with older age, the use of oxygen therapy, and elevated CRP values. Patients who received oxygen therapy were treated approximately 3 days longer than those who did not receive this therapy.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Tiempo de Internación , SARS-CoV-2 , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Anciano , Serbia/epidemiología , Adulto , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , PandemiasRESUMEN
In 2017, a severe shortage of infusion bags resulted in a paradigm change in medication administration practice from intermittent infusion to intravenous push. The Institute for Safe Medication Practices proposed safe practice guidelines for adult intravenous push medications. A different study showed that ready-to-administer medication prepared in the sterile area of a pharmacy reduces the risk of harm, nurses' time for medication administration and the cost of medications. Based on the recommendation of the Institute for Safe Medication Practices, we decided to conduct a pilot study on the implementation of sterile compounding and administration of intravenous push medication in adult patients admitted to the hospital. In the study, the stability of five intravenous push antibiotic syringes was also determined in the syringes.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Jeringas , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Jeringas/normas , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Adulto , Administración Intravenosa/métodos , Estabilidad de Medicamentos , Infusiones Intravenosas/métodos , Infusiones Intravenosas/instrumentación , Infusiones Intravenosas/normasRESUMEN
Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) can lower antibiotic use, decrease medical expenses, prevent the emergence of resistant bacteria, and enhance treatment for infectious diseases. This study summarizes the stepwise implementation and effects of ASPs in a single university-affiliated tertiary care hospital in Korea; it also presents future directions and challenges in resource-limited settings. At the study hospital, the core elements of the ASP such as leadership commitment, accountability, and operating system were established in 2000, then strengthened by the formation of the Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) Team in 2018. The actions of ASPs entail key components including a computerized restrictive antibiotic prescription system, prospective audit, post-prescription review through quantitative and qualitative intervention, and pharmacy-based interventions to optimize antibiotic usage. The AMS Team regularly tracked antibiotic use, the effects of interventions, and the resistance patterns of pathogens in the hospital. The reporting system was enhanced and standardized by participation in the Korea National Antimicrobial Use Analysis System, and educational efforts are ongoing. Stepwise implementation of the ASP and the efforts of the AMS Team have led to a substantial reduction in the overall consumption of antibiotics, particularly regarding injectables, and optimization of antibiotic use. Our experience highlights the importance of leadership, accountability, institution-specific interventions, and the AMS Team.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Hospitales Universitarios , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/organización & administración , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Hospitales Universitarios/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , República de Corea , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Centros de Atención Terciaria/normasRESUMEN
⤠Hospitalist comanagement of patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery is a growing trend across the United States, yet its implementation in an academic tertiary care hospital can be complex and even contentious.⤠Hospitalist comanagement services lead to better identification of at-risk patients, optimization of patient care to prevent adverse events, and streamlining of the admission process, thereby enhancing the overall service efficiency.⤠A successful hospitalist comanagement service includes the identification of service stakeholders and leaders; frequent consensus meetings; a well-defined standardized framework, with goals, program metrics, and unified commands; and an occasional satisfaction assessment to update and improve the program.⤠In this article, we establish a step-by-step protocol for the implementation of a comanagement structure between orthopaedic and hospitalist services at a tertiary care center, outlining specific protocols and workflows for patient care and transfer procedures among various departments, particularly in emergency and postoperative situations.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Hospitalarios , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Humanos , Médicos Hospitalarios/organización & administración , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Ortopedia/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The United States has seen a significant rise in maternal mortality and morbidity associated with cardiovascular disease over the past 4 decades. Contributing factors may include an increasing number of parturients with comorbid conditions, a higher rate of pregnancy among women of advanced maternal age, and more patients with congenital heart disease who survive into childbearing age and experiencing pregnancy. In response, national medical organizations have recommended the creation of multidisciplinary obstetric-cardiac teams, also known as pregnancy heart teams, to provide comprehensive preconception counseling and coordinated pregnancy management that extend through the postpartum period. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the development and implementation of a pregnancy heart team for parturients with cardiac disease at a southeastern United States tertiary hospital. STUDY DESIGN: This was a qualitative study that was conducted among healthcare team members involved during the pregnancy heart team formation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between April and May 2022, professionally transcribed, and the responses were thematically coded for categories and themes using constructs from The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: Themes identified included intentional collaboration to improve outpatient and inpatient coordination through earlier awareness of patients who meet the criteria and via documented care planning. The pregnancy heart team united clinicians around best practices and coordination to promote the success and safety of pregnancies and not only to minimize maternal health risks. Developing longitudinal care plans was critical among the pathway team to build on collective expertise and to provide clarity for those on shift to reduce hesitancy and achieve timely, vetted practices without additional consults. Establishing a proactive approach of specialists offering their perspectives was viewed as positively contributing to a culture of speaking up. Barriers to the successful development and sustainability of the pregnancy heart team included unmet administrative needs and clinician turnover within a context of shortages in staffing and high workload. CONCLUSION: This study described the process of developing and implementing a pregnancy heart team at 1 institution, thereby offering insights for future multidisciplinary care for maternal cardiac patients. Establishing pregnancy heart teams can enhance quality care for high-risk patients, foster learning and collaboration among physician and nursing specialties, and improve coordination to manage complex maternal cardiac cases.
Asunto(s)
Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Sudeste de Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/terapia , Adulto , Desarrollo de Programa/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To implement and evaluate the impact of a collaborative pharmacist-medical officer model of planning discharge prescriptions, Partnered Pharmacist Discharge Prescription Planning (PPDPP) on the safe use of medicines on discharge in an ED short stay unit (SSU). METHODS: A prospective pre- and post-intervention study measured the proportion of medication errors on discharge prescriptions from the SSU using the Five Rights (5Rs) method. Pharmacists assessed discharge prescriptions generated by the medical officers (MO) during the pre-intervention phase (standard practice). During the PPDPP phase, pharmacists planned electronic prescriptions in consultation with MO and completed prescriptions were independently assessed by another pharmacist. RESULTS: There were 163 and 147 prescriptions collected during the pre- and post-intervention phases, respectively. There was a significant difference in the proportion of discharge prescriptions that met all 5Rs between the standard practice (47.2%) and PPDPP phase (91.8%) (P < 0.001). There was no statistical difference seen in the mean time taken from discharge decision to prescriptions given to patients or patients leaving the SSU between the two phases. There was a non-statically significant trend towards a decrease in time taken for patients to obtain prescriptions by 11% (P = 0.16) and for actual departure time by 6% (P = 0.46). Additionally, the proportion of opioids prescribed as one of the high-risk medication classes reduced from 23.8% to 16.2% (P = 0.023) with the PPDPP model. CONCLUSION: The PPDPP model improved medications safety on discharge from the ED SSU. The PPDPP did not impact patient flow parameters as measured in this study.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Errores de Medicación , Alta del Paciente , Farmacéuticos , Humanos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/normas , Errores de Medicación/prevención & control , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Estudios Prospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , AncianoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Sepsis is a common cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. Early detection and rapid management are essential. In this study, we evaluate the compliance with the implemented maternity-specific Early Warning Score (EWS), Rapid Response Team (RRT) protocol and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) Hour-1 Bundle in a tertiary hospital in the Netherlands. METHODS: We performed a retrospective patient chart review from July 2019 to June 2020 at the Leiden University Medical Centre. We included women who received therapeutic antibiotics and were admitted for at least 24 hours. RESULTS: We included 240 women: ten were admitted twice and one woman three times, comprising 252 admissions. A clinical diagnosis of sepsis was made in 22 women. The EWS was used in 29% (n = 73/252) of admissions. Recommendations on the follow-up of the EWS were carried out in 53% (n = 46/87). Compliance with the RRT protocol was highest for assessment by a medical doctor within 30 minutes (n = 98/117, 84%) and lowest for RRT involvement (n = 7/23, 30%). In women with sepsis, compliance with the SSC Bundle was highest for acquiring blood cultures (n = 19/22, 85%), while only 64% (n = 14/22) received antibiotics within 60 minutes of the sepsis diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The adherence to the maternity-specific EWS and the SSC Hour-1 bundle was insufficient, even within this tertiary setting in a high-income country.
Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz , Sepsis , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Femenino , Países Bajos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/terapia , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Embarazo , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Puntuación de Alerta Temprana , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/terapia , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: ICU transfers from a regional to a tertiary-level hospital are initiated typically for a higher level of care. Extended transfer wait times can negatively affect survival, length of stay (LOS), and cost. METHODS: In this prospective single-center study, the subjects were adult ICU patients admitted to regional hospitals between January and October 2022, for whom a request was made to transfer to a tertiary-level medical ICU. The authors developed and implemented an interdisciplinary transfer huddle intervention (THI) with the goal of reducing wait times by providing a consistent channel of communication between key stakeholders. The primary outcome was the number of hours elapsed between transfer request and the time of transfer to the tertiary hospital. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, discharge to home, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS. Data were abstracted from electronic health records and periods before (January to June 2022) and after (June to October 2022) the intervention were compared. Data were analyzed using logistic regression or negative binomial regression, adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics. ICU fellows also completed a daily survey about barriers they perceived to the THI application. RESULTS: During the study period, 76 patients were transferred. The THI was completed 75.0% of the time. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes before and after the intervention. The top perceived barriers to transfer were lack of physical beds (50.0%) and staffing limitations (37.5%). CONCLUSION: The authors successfully developed and implemented a transfer huddle to ensure consistent interdisciplinary communication for patients being transferred between ICUs and identified barriers to such transfer. However, transfer times and patient outcomes were not significantly different after the change. Future studies should consider staffing challenges, hospital capacity, and the role of dedicated transfer teams in in decreasing inter-ICU transfer wait times.
Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Transferencia de Pacientes , Listas de Espera , Humanos , Transferencia de Pacientes/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Estudios Prospectivos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Factores de Tiempo , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
The objective of this study is to analyze the characteristics of patients who died in the Hospital Emergency Department (HED) of a Spanish third-level hospital, with a special focus on those who died due to SARS-CoV-2. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including all patients over 18 years old who died in the Hospital Emergency Department (HED) of a Spanish third-level hospital located in Badalona, Spain, from Jun 2019 to Dec 2020. Various sociodemographic, clinical, and diagnostic variables of the patients were analyzed to identify potential risk factors associated with mortality. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, a total of 72 patients died in the HED, representing a 42% increase compared to the pre-pandemic period. Of the deceased patients, 11% were attributed to SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, it was found that patients who died from SARS-CoV-2 during the first wave were significantly younger than those in the second wave, with an average age of 78.6 ± 3.1 years in the first wave and 91.8 ± 4.8 years in the second wave. No significant differences were found regarding gender or associated comorbidities. Overall, the mortality rate at the HED in relation to COVID-19 was low, and infected patients died at younger ages during the first wave compared to the second wave.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/epidemiología , España/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pandemias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Perinatal mortality multi-disciplinary team meetings (PM-MDTMs) offer a forum for multi-disciplinary discussion of poor perinatal outcomes. They ensure a thorough understanding of individual cases and present an important learning opportunity for healthcare professionals (HCPs). Attendance at PM-MDTMs in this tertiary maternity hospital has been low. AIMS: We aimed to identify barriers which may be targeted to improve attendance and engagement. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was developed, and all HCPs invited to participate. Demographic data on respondents was collected, as was knowledge of PM-MDTMs, their purpose and relevance to clinical practice, and barriers to attendance at meetings. A total of 78 responses were obtained and analysed. RESULTS: Self-reported understanding of the purpose and format PM-MDTMs was high (84.6% (66/78) and 65.4% (51/78), respectively), while only 50% (39/78) of respondents provided an accurate description of either. Only 50% (39/78) reported having attended a meeting in the hospital, of whom 61.5% (24/39) described the correct meeting. Of these, 37.5% (9/24) reported attending regularly and 70.8% (17/24) found the meeting relevant to their clinical practice. Of the 33.33% (26/78) who reported attending a PM-MDTM in another hospital, 73.1% (19/26) accurately described the meeting, 63.1% (12/19) of these attended regularly, and 100% (19/19) found it relevant. Three main qualitative themes emerged as barriers to attendance and were areas for suggested improvements: workload and staffing levels, meeting logistics, and lack of communication and education regarding PM-MDTMs. CONCLUSIONS: Communication regarding PM-MDTMs and their learning opportunities needs to improve. Lack of engagement is likely compounded by high workloads and staffing levels, but these issues should be surmountable.
Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Perinatal , Compromiso Médico , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Personal de Salud , Maternidades/organización & administración , Compromiso Médico/organización & administración , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Carga de Trabajo , Recién NacidoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2017, we established an airway call (AC) team composed of anesthesiologists to improve emergency airway management outside the operating room. In this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the airway registry, we describe the characteristics of patients attended to and practices by the AC team during the first 4 years of implementation. METHODS: All AC team activations in which an airway intervention was performed by the AC team between June 2017 and May 2021 were analyzed. RESULTS: In all, 359 events were analyzed. Activation was more common outside of working hours (62.1%) and from the intensive care unit (85.0%); 36.2% of AC activations were due to known or anticipated difficult airway, most commonly because of acquired airway anomalies (n = 49), followed by airway edema or bleeding (n = 32) and very young age (≤ 1 years; n = 30). In 71.3% of the cases, successful intubation was performed by the AC team at the first attempt. However, three or more attempts were performed in 33 cases. The most common device used for successful intubation was the videolaryngoscope (59.7%). Tracheal intubation by the AC team failed in nine patients, who then required surgical airway insertion by otolaryngologists. However, there were no airway-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: When coupled with appropriate assistance from an otolaryngologist AC system, an AC team composed of anesthesiologists could be an efficient way to provide safe airway management outside the operating room. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0006643.
Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Vía Aérea/normas , Equipo Hospitalario de Respuesta Rápida/normas , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Manejo de la Vía Aérea/métodos , Manejo de la Vía Aérea/estadística & datos numéricos , Anestesiólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Femenino , Equipo Hospitalario de Respuesta Rápida/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , República de Corea/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The recommendation of induced hypertension for delayed cerebral ischemia treatment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage has been challenged recently and ideal pressure targets are missing. A new concept advocates an individual cerebral perfusion pressure where cerebral autoregulation functions best to ensure optimal global perfusion. We characterized optimal cerebral perfusion pressure at time of delayed cerebral ischemia and tested the conformity of induced hypertension with this target value. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: University hospital neurocritical care unit. PATIENTS: Thirty-nine aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with invasive neuromonitoring (20 with delayed cerebral ischemia, 19 without delayed cerebral ischemia). INTERVENTIONS: Induced hypertension greater than 180 mm Hg systolic blood pressure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Changepoint analysis was used to calculate significant changes in cerebral perfusion pressure, optimal cerebral perfusion pressure, and the difference of cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure 48 hours before delayed cerebral ischemia diagnosis. Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure increased 30 hours before the onset of delayed cerebral ischemia from 82.8 ± 12.5 to 86.3 ± 11.4 mm Hg (p < 0.05). Three hours before delayed cerebral ischemia, a changepoint was also found in the difference of cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (decrease from -0.2 ± 11.2 to -7.7 ± 7.6 mm Hg; p < 0.05) with a corresponding increase in pressure reactivity index (0.09 ± 0.33 to 0.19 ± 0.37; p < 0.05). Cerebral perfusion pressure at time of delayed cerebral ischemia was lower than in patients without delayed cerebral ischemia in a comparable time frame (cerebral perfusion pressure delayed cerebral ischemia 81.4 ± 8.3 mm Hg, no delayed cerebral ischemia 90.4 ± 10.5 mm Hg; p < 0.05). Inducing hypertension resulted in a cerebral perfusion pressure above optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (+12.4 ± 8.3 mm Hg; p < 0.0001). Treatment response (improvement of delayed cerebral ischemia: induced hypertension+ [n = 15] or progression of delayed cerebral ischemia: induced hypertension- [n = 5]) did not correlate to either absolute values of cerebral perfusion pressure or optimal cerebral perfusion pressure, nor the resulting difference (cerebral perfusion pressure [p = 0.69]; optimal cerebral perfusion pressure [p = 0.97]; and the difference of cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure [p = 0.51]). CONCLUSIONS: At the time of delayed cerebral ischemia occurrence, there is a significant discrepancy between cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure with worsening of autoregulation, implying inadequate but identifiable individual perfusion. Standardized induction of hypertension resulted in cerebral perfusion pressures that exceeded individual optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in delayed cerebral ischemia patients. The potential benefit of individual blood pressure management guided by autoregulation-based optimal cerebral perfusion pressure should be explored in future intervention studies.