Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 144
Filtrar
1.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(16): e020528, 2021 08 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34387132

RESUMEN

Background Evidence suggests intracerebral hemorrhage survivors have earlier recovery compared with ischemic stroke survivors. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services prospective payment system instituted documentation rules for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) in 2010, with the goal of optimizing patient selection. We investigated whether these requirements limited IRF and increased skilled nursing facility (SNF) use compared with home discharge. Methods and Results Intracerebral hemorrhage discharges to IRF, SNF, or home were estimated using GWTG (Get With The Guidelines) Stroke registry data between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2015 (n=265 444). Binary hierarchical models determined associations between the 2010 Rule and discharge setting; subgroup analyses evaluated age, geographic region, and hospital type. From January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2009, 45.5% of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage had home discharge, 22.2% went to SNF, and 32.3% went to IRF. After January 1, 2010, there was a 1.06% absolute increase in home discharge, a 0.46% increase in SNF, and a 1.52% decline in IRF. The adjusted odds of IRF versus home discharge decreased 3% after 2010 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-1.00). Lower odds of IRF versus home discharge were observed in people aged <65 years (aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89-0.96), Western states (aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.95), and nonteaching hospitals (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.95). Adjusted odds of SNF versus home discharge increased 14% after 2010 (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.11-1.18); there were significant associations in all age groups, the Northeast, the South, the Midwest, and teaching hospitals. Conclusions The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 2010 IRF prospective payment system Rule resulted in fewer discharges to IRF and more discharges to SNF in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Health policy changes potentially affect access to intensive postacute rehabilitation.


Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Cerebral/rehabilitación , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Medicare , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Alta del Paciente/tendencias , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo , Centros de Rehabilitación/tendencias , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Medicare/economía , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/economía , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Alta del Paciente/economía , Alta del Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Formulación de Políticas , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistema de Registros , Centros de Rehabilitación/economía , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/economía , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
2.
Fed Regist ; 83(151): 38514-73, 2018 Aug 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30080343

RESUMEN

This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2019. As required by the Social Security Act (the Act), this final rule includes the classification and weighting factors for the IRF prospective payment system's (PPS) case-mix groups and a description of the methodologies and data used in computing the prospective payment rates for FY 2019. This final rule also alleviates administrative burden for IRFs by removing the Functional Independence Measure (FIM\TM\) instrument and associated Function Modifiers from the IRF Patient Assessment Instrument (IRF-PAI) beginning in FY 2020 and revises certain IRF coverage requirements to reduce the amount of required paperwork in the IRF setting beginning in FY 2019. Additionally, this final rule incorporates certain data items located in the Quality Indicators section of the IRF-PAI into the IRF case-mix classification system using analysis of 2 years of data beginning in FY 2020. For the IRF Quality Reporting Program (QRP), this final rule adopts a new measure removal factor, removes two measures from the IRF QRP measure set, and codifies a number of program requirements in our regulations.


Asunto(s)
Medicare/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Centros de Rehabilitación/economía , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economía , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos
3.
Rehabil Nurs ; 43(1): 3-11, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27350594

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to identify interventions to capture admission functional independence measure (FIM®) ratings on the day of admission to an inpatient rehabilitation facility. DESIGN: A quantitative evidence-based practice quality improvement study utilizing descriptive statistics. METHODS: Admission FIM® ratings from patients discharged in June 2012 (retrospective review) were compared to admission FIM® ratings from patients discharged in June 2014 (prospective review). The logic model was utilized to determine the project inputs, outputs, and outcomes. FINDINGS: Interventions to capture admission FIM® ratings on the day of admission are essential to accurately predict the patient's burden of care, length of stay, and reimbursement. Waiting until Day 2 or Day 3 after admission to capture the admission FIM® assessment resulted in inflated admission FIM® ratings and suboptimal quality outcomes. CONCLUSION/CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Interventions to capture admission FIM® ratings on the day of admission were successful at improving the quality of care, length of stay efficiency, and accurately recording admission FIM® ratings to determine the patient's burden of care.


Asunto(s)
Gravedad del Paciente , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Centros de Rehabilitación/normas , Enfermería en Rehabilitación/métodos , Anciano , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./organización & administración , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./tendencias , Femenino , Hawaii , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación en Enfermería/métodos , Evaluación en Enfermería/tendencias , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/tendencias , Recuperación de la Función , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermería en Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Enfermería en Rehabilitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
4.
Am J Occup Ther ; 72(1): 7201090010p1-7201090010p6, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29280708

RESUMEN

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has scrutinized the provision of rehabilitation services in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for some time. Little research guidance exists on appropriate dosage or rehabilitation intensity (RI) among SNF patients or patients in other postacute care (PAC) settings. CMS developed a PAC assessment, the Continuity Assessment Record and Evaluation (CARE) Tool, in response to questions about what issues drive placement in various PAC settings under Medicare. The ability to adequately assess functional outcomes and correlate them to the RI provided by using the CARE Tool is promising. However, further research, policy advocacy, and practice analysis must be undertaken to promote and protect adequate access to occupational therapy and physical therapy in SNFs and other PAC settings. Individual practitioners must participate in data gathering to ensure that the data for analysis are fully informed by the occupational therapy perspective.


Asunto(s)
Benchmarking , Política de Salud , Recuperación de la Función , Centros de Rehabilitación/normas , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/normas , Humanos , Medicare , Terapia Ocupacional , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos
5.
Fed Regist ; 82(148): 36238-305, 2017 Aug 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28805358

RESUMEN

This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2018 as required by the statute. As required by section 1886(j)(5) of the Social Security Act (the Act), this rule includes the classification and weighting factors for the IRF prospective payment system's (IRF PPS) case-mix groups and a description of the methodologies and data used in computing the prospective payment rates for FY 2018. This final rule also revises the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis codes that are used to determine presumptive compliance under the "60 percent rule," removes the 25 percent payment penalty for inpatient rehabilitation facility patient assessment instrument (IRF-PAI) late transmissions, removes the voluntary swallowing status item (Item 27) from the IRF-PAI, summarizes comments regarding the criteria used to classify facilities for payment under the IRF PPS, provides for a subregulatory process for certain annual updates to the presumptive methodology diagnosis code lists, adopts the use of height/weight items on the IRF-PAI to determine patient body mass index (BMI) greater than 50 for cases of single-joint replacement under the presumptive methodology, and revises and updates measures and reporting requirements under the IRF quality reporting program (QRP).


Asunto(s)
Medicare/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/economía , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Rehabilitación/economía , Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Estados Unidos
6.
Rev Neurol ; 64(s03): S9-S12, 2017 May 17.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28524212

RESUMEN

We report on the experience of a family in which the youngest child has acquired brain injury and the struggle undertaken by the family to improve the neurorehabilitation resources in the public health service. The article outlines the main demands, from the socio-familial point of view, as regards the improvement of neurological rehabilitation and the resources needed to deliver it.


TITLE: Daño cerebral sobrevenido infantil, una experiencia personal. Reclamaciones desde el punto de vista sociofamiliar.Se describe la experiencia de una familia en la que el hijo menor tiene daño cerebral sobrevenido y la lucha emprendida por la familia para mejorar los recursos neurorrehabilitadores de la sanidad publica. Se recogen las principales reclamaciones, desde el punto de vista sociofamiliar, en cuanto a la mejora en la atencion neurorrehabilitadora y los recursos necesarios.


Asunto(s)
Daño Encefálico Crónico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Servicios de Salud para Personas con Discapacidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accidentes por Caídas , Daño Encefálico Crónico/economía , Daño Encefálico Crónico/etiología , Daño Encefálico Crónico/psicología , Daño Encefálico Crónico/rehabilitación , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/economía , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/psicología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/rehabilitación , Cuidadores/psicología , Niño , Fracturas Múltiples/etiología , Fracturas Múltiples/rehabilitación , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud para Personas con Discapacidad/economía , Servicios de Salud para Personas con Discapacidad/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Hospitales Privados/economía , Humanos , Maniobras Políticas , Masculino , Programas Nacionales de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Derechos del Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estado Vegetativo Persistente , Rehabilitación/métodos , Rehabilitación/organización & administración , Centros de Rehabilitación/economía , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/organización & administración , España
7.
Mil Med ; 181(S4): 3-12, 2016 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27849455

RESUMEN

Congress authorized creation of the Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence (EACE) as part of the 2009 National Defense Authorization Act. The legislation mandated the Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to implement a comprehensive plan and strategy for the mitigation, treatment, and rehabilitation of traumatic extremity injuries and amputation. The EACE also was tasked with conducting clinically relevant research, fostering collaborations, and building partnerships across multidisciplinary international, federal, and academic networks to optimize the quality of life of service members and veterans who have sustained extremity trauma or amputations. To fulfill the mandate to conduct research, the EACE developed a Research and Surveillance Division that complements and collaborates with outstanding DoD, VA, and academic research programs across the globe. The EACE researchers have efforts in four key research focus areas relevant to extremity trauma and amputation: (1) Novel Rehabilitation Interventions, (2) Advanced Prosthetic and Orthotic Technologies, (3) Epidemiology and Surveillance, and (4) Medical and Surgical Innovations. This overview describes the EACE efforts to innovate, discover, and translate knowledge gleaned from collaborative research partnerships into clinical practice and policy.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica/rehabilitación , Extremidades/lesiones , Centros de Rehabilitación/organización & administración , Humanos , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Prótesis e Implantes/tendencias , Calidad de Vida/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Investigación/organización & administración , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Defense/organización & administración , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organización & administración
8.
Fed Regist ; 81(151): 52055-141, 2016 Aug 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27529901

RESUMEN

This final rule will update the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2017 as required by the statute. As required by section 1886(j)(5) of the Act, this rule includes the classification and weighting factors for the IRF prospective payment system's (IRF PPS's) case-mix groups and a description of the methodologies and data used in computing the prospective payment rates for FY 2017. This final rule also revises and updates quality measures and reporting requirements under the IRF quality reporting program (QRP).


Asunto(s)
Medicare/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Centros de Rehabilitación/economía , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Ajuste de Riesgo/economía , Ajuste de Riesgo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos
11.
Schmerz ; 29(6): 641-8, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26452370

RESUMEN

Multimodal pain treatment programs are widely accepted as the medical treatment standard in the management of patients with chronic pain syndromes. The concepts and treatment strategies are based on the biopsychosocial model of pain and programs for early restoration of function. Although this concept is primarily implemented in the curative field, i.e. in hospitals for the treatment of patients with chronic pain diseases, modified programs based on the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) can now also be found in rehabilitation clinics. Despite the assumed similarities, significant differences in, for example the aims of the therapy and relevant structural and process variables have to be kept in mind when allocating patients to a program as provided by a hospital or a rehabilitation clinic. The aim of this article is to present the framework structures of both treatment levels with respect to the implementation of multimodal pain therapy programs and to elucidate the differential diagnostic approach to the indications.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/rehabilitación , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Admisión del Paciente , Dolor Crónico/clasificación , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Alemania , Adhesión a Directriz , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Hospitalización/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Colaboración Intersectorial , Programas Nacionales de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Dimensión del Dolor , Admisión del Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia
12.
Fed Regist ; 80(151): 47035-139, 2015 Aug 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26248390

RESUMEN

This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2016 as required by the statute. As required by section 1886(j)(5) of the Act, this rule includes the classification and weighting factors for the IRF PPS's case-mix groups and a description of the methodologies and data used in computing the prospective payment rates for FY 2016. This final rule also finalizes policy changes, including the adoption of an IRF-specific market basket that reflects the cost structures of only IRF providers, a 1-year phase-in of the revised wage index changes, a 3-year phase-out of the rural adjustment for certain IRFs, and revisions and updates to the quality reporting program (QRP).


Asunto(s)
Medicare/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/economía , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Rehabilitación/economía , Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Pacientes Internos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Método de Control de Pagos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos
14.
Dan Med J ; 62(5)2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26050828

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Dysphagia is a known sequela after head and neck cancer (HNC) and causes malnutrition, aspiration pneumonia and a reduced quality of life. Due to improved survival rates, the number of patients with sequelae is increasing. Evidence on the ideal HNC-specific rehabilitation of dysphagia is lacking, but several studies indicate that early initiation is crucial. The aim of this study was to map the existing dysphagia rehabilitation programmes for HNC patients in Denmark. METHODS: Occupational therapists (OTs), oncologists and surgeons from five hospitals participated in a nationwide questionnaire-based survey, along with OTs from 39 municipal health centres. RESULTS: HNC patients rarely receive preventive occupational therapy before treatment, and hospital-based OTs mainly attend to HNC patients undergoing surgery. Far from all oncology and surgical departments complete the required rehabilitation plans upon discharge which leaves many patients untreated. There are vast differences between the municipalities' rehabilitation programmes and between the expertise employed in municipalities and hospitals. CONCLUSION: Existing HNC rehabilitation does not meet official Danish guidelines. Only a fraction of HNC patients are offered rehabilitation and often long after completing treatment. Municipal rehabilitation services vary considerably in terms of type, duration, intensity and expertise. Dysphagia-related rehabilitation requires an improved monitoration, possibly with an increase in the uptake of centralised dysphagia rehabilitation. FUNDING: not relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/rehabilitación , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/rehabilitación , Directrices para la Planificación en Salud , Terapia Ocupacional/normas , Centros de Rehabilitación/normas , Ciudades , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Dinamarca , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Humanos , Oncología Médica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Oncología Médica/normas , Terapia Ocupacional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Calidad de Vida , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
15.
Fed Regist ; 78(151): 47859-934, 2013 Aug 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23923144

RESUMEN

This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2014 (for discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2013 and on or before September 30, 2014) as required by the statute. This final rule also revised the list of diagnosis codes that may be counted toward an IRF's "60 percent rule'' compliance calculation to determine "presumptive compliance,'' update the IRF facility-level adjustment factors using an enhanced estimation methodology, revise sections of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument, revise requirements for acute care hospitals that have IRF units, clarify the IRF regulation text regarding limitation of review, update references to previously changed sections in the regulations text, and revise and update quality measures and reporting requirements under the IRF quality reporting program.


Asunto(s)
Medicare/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Centros de Rehabilitación/economía , Rehabilitación/economía , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economía , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/legislación & jurisprudencia , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/economía , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades/economía , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Notificación Obligatoria , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos
16.
Health Serv Res ; 48(5): 1557-80, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23557215

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To understand the impacts of Medicare payment reform on the entry and exit of post-acute providers. DATA SOURCES: Medicare Provider of Services data, Cost Reports, and Census data from 1991 through 2010. STUDY DESIGN: We examined market-level changes in entry and exit after payment reforms relative to a preexisting time trend. We also compared changes in high Medicare share markets relative to lower Medicare share markets and for freestanding relative to hospital-based facilities. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: We calculated market-level entry, exit, and total stock of home health agencies, skilled nursing facilities, and inpatient rehabilitation facilities from Provider of Services files between 1992 and 2010. We linked these measures with demographic information from the Census and American Community Survey, information on Certificate of Need laws, and Medicare share of facilities in each market drawn from Cost Report data. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Payment reforms reducing average and marginal payments reduced entries and increased exits from the market. Entry effects were larger and more persistent than exit effects. Entry and exit rates fluctuated more for home health agencies than skilled nursing facilities. Effects on number of providers were consistent with entry and exit effects. CONCLUSIONS: Payment reform affects market entry and exit, which in turn may affect market structure, access to care, quality and cost of care, and patient outcomes. Policy makers should consider potential impacts of payment reforms on post-acute care market structure when implementing these reforms.


Asunto(s)
Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicare/economía , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política de Salud , Agencias de Atención a Domicilio/economía , Agencias de Atención a Domicilio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Medicare Payment Advisory Commission , Centros de Rehabilitación/economía , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/legislación & jurisprudencia , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/economía , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención Subaguda/economía , Estados Unidos
17.
Fed Regist ; 77(221): 68209-565, 2012 Nov 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23155551

RESUMEN

This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for CY 2013 to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems. In this final rule with comment period, we describe the changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare services paid under the OPPS and those paid under the ASC payment system. In addition, this final rule with comment period updates and refines the requirements for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, the ASC Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program, and the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Quality Reporting Program. We are continuing the electronic reporting pilot for the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program, and revising the various regulations governing Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs), including the secure transmittal of electronic medical information, beneficiary complaint resolution and notification processes, and technical changes. The technical changes to the QIO regulations reflect CMS' commitment to the general principles of the President's Executive Order on Regulatory Reform, Executive Order 13563 (January 18, 2011).


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicare/economía , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/economía , Centros Quirúrgicos/economía , Atención Ambulatoria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Current Procedural Terminology , Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System , Humanos , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/legislación & jurisprudencia , Proyectos Piloto , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos
18.
Fed Regist ; 77(222): 68891-9373, 2012 Nov 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23155552

RESUMEN

This major final rule with comment period addresses changes to the physician fee schedule, payments for Part B drugs, and other Medicare Part B payment policies to ensure that our payment systems are updated to reflect changes in medical practice and the relative value of services. It also implements provisions of the Affordable Care Act by establishing a face-to-face encounter as a condition of payment for certain durable medical equipment (DME) items. In addition, it implements statutory changes regarding the termination of non-random prepayment review. This final rule with comment period also includes a discussion in the Supplementary Information regarding various programs . (See the Table of Contents for a listing of the specific issues addressed in this final rule with comment period.)


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Equipo Médico Durable/economía , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicare Part B/economía , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/economía , Centros Quirúrgicos/economía , Atención Ambulatoria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Current Procedural Terminology , Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System , Humanos , Medicare Part B/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/legislación & jurisprudencia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Proyectos Piloto , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos
19.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol ; 56(4): 539-56, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21518702

RESUMEN

To explore the effectiveness of court-supervised drug treatment for California parolees, offender characteristics, treatment experiences, and outcomes were examined and contrasted to those of probationers. The analysis used statewide administrative data on 4,507 parolees and 22,701 probationers referred to treatment by Proposition 36 during fiscal year 2006-2007. Compared with probationers, parolee problems were more severe at treatment entry, more were treated in residential settings, treatment retention was shorter, and fewer completed treatment. Regarding outcomes, fewer parolees were successful at treatment discharge and more recidivated over 12-months post admission. Both groups improved in many areas by treatment discharge, but improvements were generally smaller among parolees. Significant interaction effects indicated that parolees benefited from residential care and more treatment days, even after controlling for covariates. Court-supervised drug treatment for parolees can "work;" however, parolees have more frequent and diverse needs, and their outcomes are enhanced by more intensive treatment. Findings suggest methods for optimizing the effectiveness of criminal-justice-supervised programs for treating drug-dependent offenders.


Asunto(s)
Prisioneros/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prisioneros/psicología , Derivación y Consulta/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/rehabilitación , Adulto , California , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento/psicología , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prevención Secundaria , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/prevención & control , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Med Tr Prom Ekol ; (8): 1-5, 2011.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22180968

RESUMEN

The study based on Rehabilitation Center No 2 in Rostov region covered 100 male patients with dust obstructive bronchitis. The authors considered organisational and legal problems of medical rehabilitation for patients with occupational diseases caused by dust. The authors also specified and suggested stages of individual medical rehabilitation and efficiency criteria for rehabilitation, exeplified by dust obstructive bronchitis patients. Data show that creation and accomplishment of individual medical rehabilitation programs for dust obstructive bronchitis patients enable to optimize rehabilitation process, provide continuity of medical rehabilitation, evaluate efficiency of rehabilitation measures on each step of medical rehabilitation. Higher efficiency of rehabilitation is achieved by individual rehabilitation added by nebulizer treatment, efferent therapy, psychologic correction and specialized education for chronic patients with obstructive lung diseases.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/toxicidad , Bronquitis/rehabilitación , Polvo , Enfermedades Profesionales/rehabilitación , Salud Laboral/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/organización & administración , Bronquitis/etiología , Regulación Gubernamental , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Rehabilitación/organización & administración , Rehabilitación/normas , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Federación de Rusia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA