Hydrogel-Based Dressings and Multidisciplinary Care in Severe Pediatric Burns: A Case Report of Successful Healing and Hypertrophic Scar Prevention.

BACKGROUND Pediatric burn injuries are a global health concern, particularly in infants and toddlers, who face increased risks owing to their higher water content. Despite substantial medical treatment, the mortality rates remain challenging, especially in severe cases. This study explored non-surgical interventions for pediatric burn injuries, aiming to enhance care and alleviate the burden on affected children. CASE REPORT A 16-month-old boy with 30% mixed second- and third-degree burns presented with a scald injury. Initial measures included dressing and analgesia. The Plastic Surgery team led the treatment. Upon admission, the patient experienced convulsions due to hyponatremia in the burn unit and was subsequently transferred to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Burn care management included the use of hyaluronic acid and occupational therapy. Scheduled dressing changes, including the use of glycerin-based dressings, resulted in satisfactory wound healing. Split skin grafting from the right thigh was performed to prevent elbow joint contracture. Preventive measures against hypertrophic scarring were also implemented. The patient was discharged after follow-up appointments. Consent for publication of case details and photographs was obtained from the patient's father. CONCLUSIONS The presented non-surgical approach, incorporating hyaluronic acid, Bactigras, Elasto-Gel, and a multidisciplinary team, can effectively treat mixed partial- and full-thickness burn injuries in pediatric populations. Split-thickness grafts may be required in functional areas. Therefore, a comprehensive management strategy that considers tissue damage, electrolyte balance, and infection is crucial. This report underscores the importance of meticulous assessment and correction of overall patient condition, especially in pediatric cases of electrolyte imbalance.

Scar outcomes for conservatively managed children post burn injury: A retrospective study.

Hypertrophic scarring is a significant complication post burn injury, especially for delayed healing after 3 weeks. Burn injuries healing prior to 3 weeks also have the potential to develop hypertrophic scarring, even when prescribed prophylactic conservative scar interventions. A retrospective chart audit reviewed 326 burn patients treated at a paediatric tertiary hospital from 2014 to 2019 who sustained a partial thickness burn, healed >14 days and did not receive skin grafting. A scar was deemed hypertrophic if >1 mm in height. Early hypertrophic scar prevalence was defined as 3-6 months post burn, while persistent hypertrophic scarring was defined as 12-18 months post burn. Median days to wound closure was 18. The prevalence of early and persistent hypertrophic scarring was 56.1% and 16.3%, respectively. Seventeen (5.2%) children underwent medical interventions for scar modulation. Early signs of hypertrophic scarring were seen in just over half the patients presenting to burn therapy and despite scar intervention, persistent hypertrophic scarring was seen in 16.3%. At both time points, just over half of the children presenting healed between 14 and 21 days. Therefore, children healing prior to 21 days have potential to develop hypertrophic scarring.

Minimally invasive surgical approach to model hypertrophic scarring in the rabbit ear.

BACKGROUND: Current strategies for hypertrophic scar prevention and treatment are limited. OBJECTIVE: To facilitate these efforts, a minimally invasive hypertrophic scar model was created in a rabbit ear for the first time based on previous methods used to induce ischemia. METHODS: Six New Zealand white rabbits (12 ears total) were studied. First, ischemia was achieved by ligating the cranial artery, cranial vein and central artery, while preserving the caudal artery, caudal vein and central vein, respectively. The relative level of ischemia induced at time of surgery, both baseline and maximum perfusion, was assessed with a fluorescent light-assisted angiography and demonstrated lower rates of perfusion in the ischemic ears. Following vascular injury, a 2-cm full thickness linear wound was created on the ventral ear and closed with 4 - 0 Nylon sutures under high tension. For each rabbit, one ear received a combination of ischemia and wounding with suture tension (n = 6), while the other ear was non-ischemic with wounding and suture tension alone (n = 6). RESULTS: Four weeks post-operatively, ischemic ears developed scar hypertrophy (histological scar thickness: 1.1 ± 0.2 mm versus 0.5 ± 0.1 mm, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Herein, we describe a novel, prototypical minimally invasive rabbit ear model of hypertrophic scar formation that can allow investigation of new drugs for scar prevention.

Utility of customized 3D compression mask with pressure sensors on facial burn scars: A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: A pressure of approximately 15-25 mmHg is used for effective compression therapy to prevent and treat hypertrophic scar formation in patients with burns. However, conventional facial compression garments present challenges owing to inadequate pressure distribution in curved areas such as the cheeks, around the mouth, and the slope of the nose. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of a custom-made 3D compression mask equipped with pressure sensors to treat facial burn scars. METHODS: This single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted between May and October 2023, involving 48 burn scars in 12 inpatients with facial burns. We created the custom-made 3D compression mask equipped with pressure sensors, inner lined with biocompatible silicon, and a harness system using 3D printing technology, which can continuously monitor whether an appropriate pressure of 15-25 mmHg maintains. The biological scar properties, Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) scores in patients with facial burns were assessed before applying the compression mask and garment and at 4 and 12 weeks after application. RESULTS: Pre-application assessment of biological scar properties, VSS, and POSAS revealed no statistically significant differences between the 3D mask and control groups (p > 0.05 for all). Throughout the 12-week application, skin hydration and scar thickness significantly increased (p < 0.001) and reduced (p = 0.010), respectively, in the 3D mask group compared to the control group. Additionally, significant improvements in scar pliability (p = 0.004) and height (p = 0.009) of VSS, itching (p = 0.047), scar stiffness (p = 0.001), thickness (p = 0.011), and irregularity (p < 0.001) of POSAS-patient component, and scar thickness (p = 0.001), pliability (p = 0.012), and surface area (p = 0.027) of the POSAS-observer component were observed in 3D mask group throughout the 12-week application compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The customized 3D compression mask equipped with pressure sensors significantly improved scar thickness, skin hydration, and various assessment scale parameters throughout the 12-week application.

Preventive Effect of Hydrocolloid Dressings on Hypertrophic Scarring of Post-Cesarean Section Wounds: A Randomized Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prophylactic effect of hydrocolloid dressings on hypertrophic scarring in post-cesarean section wounds. METHODS: Patients who underwent cesarean section (C/S) at the authors' hospital and provided informed consent to participate were randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups. The intervention group commenced applying hydrocolloid dressings to the wound on postoperative day 7 or 8 and continued with weekly dressing changes for 6 months. The control group refrained from any dressing application but was followed up. In each group, the condition of the wound was evaluated 6 and 12 months postoperatively using the Japan Scar Workshop Scar Scale 2015, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale version 2.0, the modified Vancouver Scar Scale, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: During this period, 135 patients underwent C/S at the authors' institution, and 47 (23 in the intervention group and 24 in the control group) were included in the analysis. In all assessment methods, the intervention group scored lower than the control group at 6 and 12 months after C/S. Twelve months after C/S, hypertrophic scarring (Japan Scar Workshop Scar Scale 2015 score of 6-15) was found in 14 of the 47 (29.8%) patients: 11 of 24 (45.8%) in the control group and 3 of 23 (13.0%) in the intervention group. The intervention's relative risk was 0.623 (95% CI, 0.417-0.930). The risk factor for hypertrophic scarring was midline vertical incision, with an odds ratio of 20.53 (95% CI, 4.18-100.92). CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals that the application of hydrocolloid dressings to wounds reduces the risk of hypertrophic scarring after C/S.

Update on Hypertrophic Scar Management in Burn Patients.

Hypertrophic scars arise from burn injuries because of persistent inflammation in the reticular dermis. Several risk factors promote this chronic inflammation. One is tension on the burn wound/scar due to surrounding skin tightness and bodily movements. High estrogen levels and hypertension are also important systemic risk factors. Thus, to prevent burn wounds from developing into hypertrophic scars, it is important to focus on quickly resolving the reticular dermal inflammation. If conservative treatments are not effective and the hypertrophic scar transitions to scar contracture, surgical methods such as Z-plasty, full-thickness skin grafting, and local flaps are often used.

Application and effect of tension-reducing suture in surgical treatment of hypertrophic scar.

PURPOSE: To investigate the application and effectiveness of tension-reducing suture in the repair of hypertrophic scars. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of clinical data was conducted on 82 patients with hypertrophic scars treated at the Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from September 2021 to December 2022. Patients were operated with combination of heart-shaped tension-reducing suturing technique and looped, broad, and deep buried (LBD) suturing technique or conventional suture method. Outcomes of surgical treatment were assessed before and 6 months after surgery using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). RESULTS: Improvements were achieved on scar quality compared to that preoperatively, with a reduction in scar width (1.7 ± 0.6 cm vs. 0.7 ± 0.2 cm, P < 0.001). Assessment using the POSAS and VSS scales showed significant improvements in each single parameter and total score compared to preoperative values (P < 0.05). The Combination method group achieved better score in total score of VSS scale, in color, stiffness, thickness and overall opinion of PSAS scale, and in vascularity, thickness, pliability and overall opinion of OSAS scale. CONCLUSION: The amalgamation of the heart-shaped tension-reducing suturing technique and the LBD suturing technique has shown promising outcomes, garnering notably high levels of patient satisfaction in the context of hypertrophic scar repair. Patients have exhibited favorable postoperative recoveries, underscoring the clinical merit and the prospective broader applicability of this approach in the realm of hypertrophic scar management.

Effects of botulinum toxin type A in the prevention and treatment of facial hypertrophic scars: A meta-analysis.

A meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively evaluate the prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) in the treatment of facial hypertrophic scars. Computerised searches were performed in databases, from their inception to November 2023, including Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases, focusing on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the use of BTX-A for treating facial hypertrophic scars. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and conducted quality assessments. Stata 17.0 software was employed for data analysis. Seventeen RCTs were ultimately included, involving 1605 patients who underwent facial cosmetic surgery. The analysis revealed that compared with conventional treatments, BTX-A significantly reduced visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -3.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.16 to -1.84, p < 0.001) and Vancouver scar scale (VSS) scores (SMD: -2.86, 95% CI: -4.03 to -1.68, p < 0.001), and narrowed scar width (SMD: -1.80, 95% CI: -2.48 to -1.13, p < 0.001), while also enhancing the overall effectiveness of the treatment. This study indicates that BTX-A is an effective modality in the prophylaxis and treatment of facial hypertrophic scars, significantly alleviating scar-related pain and preventing scar widening, and is thus worthy of broader clinical application.

Exogenous PRAS40 reduces KLF4 expression and alleviates hypertrophic scar fibrosis and collagen deposition through inhibiting mTORC1.

BACKGROUND: To identify the anti-fibrosis effect of PRAS40 in scar, and its potential mechanism. METHODS: We constructed a rat model of hypertrophic scarthat was locally injected the PRAS40 overexpression adenoviruses, mTORC1 inhibitor MHY1485 and activator rapamycin, and further observed the pathological changes of skin tissue and the severity of fibrosis by HE, Masson and sirius red staining, and analyzed the deposition of a-SMA and collagen I by western blot and immunofluorescence test. Meanwhile, the co-localization of KLF4 with a-SMA and type I collagen was analyzed, as well as the regulatory effect of PRAS40 on KLF4. In addition, we also verified whether the inhibition of scar fibrosis by PRAS40 is related to mTORC1, and whether the upregulation of KLF4 is related to mTORC1. RESULTS: The results showed that the expression of PRAS40 was low and p-PRAS40 was high in scar skin tissue. After local injection of PRAS40 overexpression adenovirus, the expression of PRAS40 in skin tissue was increased. The overexpression of PRAS40 can inhibit scar skin fibrosis and reduce the content of a-SMA and collagen I. Further mechanism analysis confirms that the inhibitory effect of PRAS40 on skin fibrosis is related to mTORC1, and PRAS40 inhibits the activation of mTORC1. The expression of KLF4 is relatively low in scar tissue. PRAS40 administration upregulated the expression of KLF4, which is related to mTORC1 CONCLUSIONS: PRAS40 significantly improves fibrosis of scar skin tissue and increases the expression of KLF4 in scars. The anti-fibrotic effect of PRAS40 depends on mTORC1.

A systematic review of the management of postoperative scars with silicone gel-based products in randomized controlled trials.

Although postoperative scarring may be considered a cosmetic concern, it can greatly impact a patient's quality of life. This extends beyond psychosocial burden influenced by hypertrophic scars and keloids, as patients also experience discomfort and pain. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of silicone gel (SG)-based products in preventing postoperative abnormal scar formation. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a PubMed search was performed to find randomized, controlled trials investigating the effect of SG-based products on postoperative wound healing. The search yielded 359 publications, but only 30 studies published between 1991-2022 were found to fit the inclusion criteria. Outcomes were extracted from the literature and subsequent quality and risk of bias assessments were performed. Most studies indicated improvement of at least one quality of the scar with the use of SG-based products. The greatest potential variable increasing bias was an inadequate control group. Studies also suffered from small sample sizes, use of unvalidated scar assessment scales, lack of double-blinding, and short follow-up periods. Overall, SG-based products demonstrated potential in preventing abnormal scar formation during postoperative healing, but further studies are required to validate the results of current literature.

Comparing the Effectiveness of Glucocorticoids in Preventing Hypertrophic Scar Diagnosis in Burn Patients.

Background and Objectives: The prevalence of hypertrophic scarring after a burn is approximately 70%. Despite advances in burn management, there is currently no gold standard treatment to reduce or prevent its occurrence. Glucocorticoids are frequently given to patients early after burns for other therapeutic purposes and have been shown to induce scar regression. Therefore, the purpose of the present work is to determine the incidence of hypertrophic scar diagnosis in burn patients who were administered glucocorticoid treatment using TriNetX, a large patient database. Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with hypertrophic scarring, hypertrophic disorders of the skin, or scar conditions and fibrosis of the skin after burn injury were identified in the TriNetX database. The glucocorticoids investigated include hydrocortisone, methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, triamcinolone, and prednisone. Patients were stratified into three groups based on total body surface area (TBSA) burned: 0-19%, 20-39%, and 40-100%. The risk ratio was evaluated for burn patients who received varying glucocorticoids after injury based on TBSA burned. Additionally, treatment pathways, time of treatment, and treatment purity pathways were evaluated. Results: In patients with a 0-19% TBSA burn, methylprednisolone showed a decreased risk of developing hypertrophic scar diagnosis. In those with a 20-39% TBSA burn or 40-100% TBSA burn, dexamethasone showed an increased risk of developing hypertrophic scar diagnosis. Additionally, dexamethasone was the most commonly administered glucocorticoid for burn patients and was most likely to be administered earlier after burn injury, comparatively. Conclusions: Methylprednisolone was associated with reduced hypertrophic scar diagnosis in burn patients independent of TBSA burn. While glucocorticoids are one of the mainstay treatments for hypertrophic scarring, further studies are needed to determine early therapeutic interventions that will reduce the potential for hypertrophic scar development in burn patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Pressure Therapy Alone and in Combination with Silicone in Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: At present, there are many kinds of hypertrophic scar treatment methods, among which pressure therapy and silicone therapy are very common and standard therapies, but whether they are used alone or in combination is still controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of pressure therapy and silicone therapy (PTS) with pressure therapy alone (PT) in the treatment of hypertrophic scars to provide clinicians with information so that they can make better decisions. METHODS: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were collected by searching PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases to assess scar scores (The Vancouver Scar Scale, VSS; Visual Analog Scale, VAS) and adverse effects. RESULTS: We screened 1270 articles and included 6 RCTs including 228 patients. We found that height (MD = 0.15, 95%CI 0.10-0.21, p < 0.01) and pliability (MD = 0.35, 95%CI 0.25-0.46, p <0.01) had a significant difference, these two measures showed that the PTS group was superior to the PT group. Results in other aspects, such as VSS, vascularity, pigmentation, VAS, and adverse effects were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between PTS and PT in the overall treatment efficacy of hypertrophic scars with similar VSS and adverse effects, but PTS might have potential benefits for height and pliability. Additional studies with larger sample size and sound methodological quality are needed to confirm our conclusions. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Serum Amyloid P Attenuates Hypertrophic Scarring in Large Animal Models.

INTRODUCTION: This study's purpose was to (1)determine the effect of locally administered serum amyloid P (SAP) on the development of hypertrophic scars (HTS) in porcine and rabbit HTS models and (2)determine the pharmacokinetics of systemically administered SAP and its effect on circulating fibrocyte quantities. METHODS: Two large animal (New Zealand White Rabbit and Female Red Duroc Pigs) HTS models were utilized to study the effects of daily local injections of SAP immediately post wounding (x5 d in rabbits; x7 d in pigs) on HTS development as measured by scar elevation index , scar area, wound closure, and molecular expression studies of scar components. For SAP pharmacokinetics, total and human SAP levels in porcine blood were measured at regular intervals following intravenous administration of human SAP. Fibrocyte quantities were determined prior to and 1 h following human SAP intravenous administration. RESULTS: In the rabbit model, local SAP significantly decreased the level of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 mRNA expression and maintained matrix mettaloproteinase-9 expression, while control and vehicle groups significantly declined. In the pig model, there was a significant decrease in the trend of scar elevation indexes treated with local SAP versus controls over the study period. This decrease was statistically significant at days 14 and 84. Human SAP administered intravenously is degraded within 24 h and does not influence circulating fibrocyte quantities. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate attenuation of HTS formation using locally administered SAP in large animal HTS models. Local SAP administration reduces HTS formation by maintaining matrix mettaloproteinase-9 and decreasing tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1. Intravenous administration of SAP is not as effective.

[New research advances in hypertrophic scar formation, prevention and treatment].

Scarring, naturally induced by fibroblasts(Fb) during wound healing, is an essential process in response to repair damaged tissue. Excessive Fb proliferation which produces the excessive collagen deposition, including increased extracellular matrix synthesis or insufficient decomposition, typically contributes to hypertrophic scar(HS) formation. Although exact mechanisms of HS are not yet fully understood, it is generally believed that dysfunction of Fb and regulation of signal pathways play an important role in HS formation. Biologically, Fb function is affected by various factors such as cytokines, extracellular matrix and itself. In addition, modifications of miRNA, ceRNA, lncRNA, peptides and histones participate in HS formation by affecting the biological function of Fb. Despite the clinical importance, very few therapeutic modalities are available to prevent HS. To achieve this, a deeper characterization of Fb is required to identify mechanisms of HS. To the aspect of HS prevention and treatment, we review recent findings, concentrating on Fb function and collagen secretion. The objective of this article is to frame the current understanding, gain the deeper insights into Fb function, and provide the more comprehensive cognition and perspective for prevention and treatment of HS.

Comparison of LeniScar Silicone Stick (AnsCare) With Traditional Silicone Gel (Dermatix Ultra) in Wound Scar Prevention and Removal.

BACKGROUND: As we all know, the numbers of aesthetic surgery are increasing around the world. After the surgery, the scar would be a problematic issue for both the surgeons and the patients. Silicone has proven to be effective for keloids, hypertrophic scars, and prevention of scar formation in many literatures for a long time. In terms of scar prevention, silicone has been used in the form of silicone sheets in early times, which is later improved to be the form of silicone gel with the advantage of easier usage. Although silicone gel has improved greatly in the aspect of appearance and convenience of the silicone sheets, there are still some disadvantages of the gel form. Therefore, the LeniScar silicone stick (AnsCare) is invented. OBJECTIVE: This article aimed to compare the results of scar treatment and prevention of the AnsCare LeniScar Silicone Stick versus the traditional silicone gel (Dermatix Ultra). METHODS: This study was a prospective, nonblinded, randomized clinical study. There were a total of 68 patients from September 2018 to January 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups with AnsCare (n = 43) and Dermatix (n = 25), who both were required to schedule regular outpatient clinic follow-up, and photographs were taken before use, 1, 2, and 3 months later after the usage for the record. The physician assessed the scar condition by the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). The scores of the VSS were further analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The overall P value of total score of VSS was 0.635, which indicates that there is no significant difference in using AnsCare LeniScar Silicone Stick versus Dermatix Ultra silicone gel in terms of scar prevention and treatment. Individual items of VSS such as pliability, height, vascularity, and pigmentation all show no significant statistical difference in the 2 treatment products, with P = 0.980, 0.778, 0.528, and 0.366, respectively. CONCLUSION: Traditional Dermatix Ultra silicone gel has been effective in the treatment of scar formation. AnsCare LeniScar Silicone Stick is statistically not different from the Dermatix Ultra silicone gel when comparing the treatment results of scar prevention. Furthermore, the AnsCare LeniScar Silicone Stick has the advantages of being time-saving with no need to wait for it to dry and application of precise amount to precise location, preventing waste or overuse.

Triangular Resection Epicanthoplasty: A Novel Method of Minimizing Hypertrophic Scar After Medial Epicanthoplasty.

Medial epicanthoplasty is a crucial component in Asian cosmetic eyelid surgery. Conventional surgical methods have mandated wide undermining for the purpose of sufficient release. However, excessive undermining may result in hypertrophic scar or webbing deformities. To minimize undesirable results, the authors are proposing a novel approach. From March 2010 to December 2017, a triangular resection epicanthoplasty was performed in 421 Asian patients. The authors' procedure consists of triangular skin resection, the release of orbicularis oculi muscle and upper half medial epicanthal tendon, and dog ear correction. No complication regarding scarring or webbing was reported. The revision was performed in 18 cases where the patients wanted additional correction. The triangular resection epicanthoplasty offers both optimal results and minimal scar with relative simplicity.

Reducing Risks of Facial Scarring.

Risk factors for the formation of facial scars include skin type, ethnicity, scar location, and certain medical conditions that contribute to poor or delayed healing. Risk of scar can be reduced with appropriate surgical planning, including proper placement and design of incisions, meticulous skin closure, aseptic technique, and wound care to improve healing. Common pathologic scars include hypertrophic scars and keloid scars, each of which has unique approaches to surgical revision and medical treatment due to their respective risks of recurrence. Topical scar therapies, medical therapies, and surgical revision techniques for improvement in final scar appearance are discussed.

Pressure therapy for scars: Myth or reality? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic scarring is a deviate occurrence after wound closure and is a common burn sequela. The mainstay of scar treatment consists of a trifold approach: hydration, UV-protection and the use of pressure garments with or without extra paddings or inlays to provide additional pressure. Pressure therapy has been reported to induce a state of hypoxia and to reduce the expression pattern of transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1), therefore limiting the activity of fibroblasts. However, pressure therapy is said to be largely based on empirical evidence and a lot of controversy concerning the effectiveness still prevails. Many variables influencing its effectivity, such as adherence to treatment, wear time, wash frequency, number of available pressure garment sets and amount of pressure remain only partially understood. This systematic review aims to give a complete and comprehensive overview of the currently available clinical evidence of pressure therapy. METHODS: A systematic search for articles concerning the use of pressure therapy in the treatment and prevention of scars was performed in 3 different databases (Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane library) according to the PRISMA statement. Only case series, case-control studies, cohort studies, and RCTs were included. The qualitative assessment was done by 2 separate reviewers with the appropriate quality assessment tools. RESULTS: The search yielded 1458 articles. After deduplication and removal of ineligible records, 1280 records were screened on title and abstract. Full text screening was done for 23 articles and ultimately 17 articles were included. Comparisons between pressure or no pressure, low vs high pressure, short vs long duration and early vs late start of treatment were investigated. CONCLUSION: There is sufficient evidence that indicates the value of prophylactic and curative use of pressure therapy for scar management. The evidence suggests that pressure therapy is capable of improving scar color, thickness, pain, and scar quality in general. Evidence also recommends commencing pressure therapy prior to 2 months after injury, and using a minimal pressure of 20-25 mmHg. To be effective, treatment duration should be at least 12 months and even preferably up to 18-24 months. These findings were in line with the best evidence statement by Sharp et al. (2016).

Scar Management and Dyschromia: A Summary Report from the 2021 American Burn Association State of the Science Meeting.

Burn scars, and in particular, hypertrophic scars, are a challenging yet common outcome for survivors of burn injuries. In 2021, the American Burn Association brought together experts in burn care and research to discuss critical topics related to burns, including burn scars, at its State of the Science conference. Clinicians and researchers with burn scar expertise, as well as burn patients, industry representatives, and other interested stakeholders met to discuss issues related to burn scars and discuss priorities for future burn scar research. The various preventative strategies and treatment modalities currently utilized for burn scars were discussed, including relatively noninvasive therapies such as massage, compression, and silicone sheeting, as well as medical interventions such as corticosteroid injection and laser therapies. A common theme that emerged is that the efficacy of current therapies for specific patient populations is not clear, and further research is needed to improve upon these treatments and develop more effective strategies to suppress scar formation. This will necessitate quantitative analyses of outcomes and would benefit from creation of scar biobanks and shared data resources. In addition, outcomes of importance to patients, such as scar dyschromia, must be given greater attention by clinicians and researchers to improve overall quality of life in burn survivors. Herein we summarize the main topics of discussion from this meeting and offer recommendations for areas where further research and development are needed.

Salvianolic Acid B Attenuates Hypertrophic Scar Formation In Vivo and In Vitro.

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic scars (HTSs) are a fibroproliferative disorder that occur following skin injuries. Salvianolic acid B (Sal-B) is an extractant from Salvia miltiorrhiza that has been reported to ameliorate fibrosis in multiple organs. However, the antifibrotic effect on HTSs remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the antifibrotic effect of Sal-B in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: In vitro, hypertrophic scar-derived fibroblasts (HSFs) were isolated from human HTSs and cultured. HSFs were treated with (0, 10, 50, 100 µmol/L) Sal-B. Cell proliferation and migration were evaluated by EdU, wound healing, and transwell assays. The protein and mRNA levels of TGFßI, Smad2, Smad3, α-SMA, COL1, and COL3 were detected by Western blots and real-time PCR. In vivo, tension stretching devices were fixed on incisions for HTS formation. The induced scars were treated with 100 µL of Sal-B/PBS per day according to the concentration of the group and followed up for 7 or 14 days. The scar condition, collagen deposition, and α-SMA expression were analyzed by gross visual examination, H&E, Masson, picrosirius red staining, and immunofluorescence. RESULTS: In vitro, Sal-B inhibited HSF proliferation, migration, and downregulated the expression of TGFßI, Smad2, Smad3, α-SMA, COL1, and COL3 in HSFs. In vivo, 50 and 100 µmol/L Sal-B significantly reduced scar size in gross and cross-sectional observations, with decreased α-SMA expression and collagen deposition in the tension-induced HTS model. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that Sal-B inhibits HSFs proliferation, migration, fibrotic marker expression and attenuates HTS formation in a tension-induced HTS model in vivo. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .