[Comparison of etoposide combined with G-CSF and cyclophosphamide combined with G-CSF in the mobilization of autologous peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma].

Objective: The effect and safety of etoposide combined with G-CSF were compared with those of cyclophosphamide combined with G-CSF in autologous peripheral blood mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) . Methods: Patients with MM who received autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and collection in the Department of Hematology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from January 1, 2020 to July 31, 2023 were included. A total of 134 patients were screened by propensity score matching technology according to a 1∶1 ratio. A total of 67 cases were each treated with ETO combined with G-CSF mobilization scheme (ETO group) and CTX combined with G-CSF mobilization scheme (CTX group). Their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Results: ①Collection results: the ETO and CTX groups [2 (1-3) d vs 2 (1-5) d; P<0.001] and CD34(+) cells [7.62×10(6) (2.26×10(6)-37.20×10(6)) /kg vs 2.73×10(6) (0.53×10(6)-9.85×10(6)) /kg; P<0.001] were collected. The success rate of collection was 100.0% (67/67) versus 76.1% (51/67) (P<0.001). Excellent rate of collection was 82.1% (55/67) versus 20.9% (14/67; P<0.001). Two patients in the ETO group switched protocols after 1 day of collection, and 11 patients in the CTX group switched protocols after 1-2 days of collection. ②Adverse reactions: granular deficiency with fever (21.5%[14/65] vs. 10.7%[6/56]; P=0.110), requiring platelet transfusion [10.7% (7/65) vs 1.8% (1/56) ; P=0.047]. ③Until the end of follow-up, 63 cases in the ETO group and 54 cases in the CTX group have undergone autologous transplantation. The median number of CD34(+) cells infused in the two groups was 4.62×10(6) (2.14×10(6)-19.89×10(6)) /kg versus 2.62×10(6) (1.12×10(6)-5.31×10(6)) /kg (P<0.001), neutrophil implantation time was 11 (9-14) d versus 11 (10-14) d (P=0.049), and platelet implantation time was 11 (0-19) d vs. 12 (0-34) d (P=0.035). One case in the CTX group experienced delayed platelet implantation. Conclusion: The mobilization scheme of etoposide combined with G-CSF requires relatively platelet transfusion, but the collection days are shortened. The collection success rate, excellent rate, and the number of CD34(+) cells obtained are high, and the neutrophil and platelet engraftment is accelerated after transplantation.

Comparing 2-day vs 3-day flu-CY lymphodepleting regimens for CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in patients with non-hodgkin's lymphoma.

Introduction: Lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC) is critical to CAR T-cell expansion and efficacy. Despite this, there is not a consensus in the literature regarding the optimal LDC regimen, including dose and frequency. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients at a single institution that received LDC prior to treatment with the CD19 directed CAR T-cell products axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel. Patients treated at our center received fludarabine 30 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 for 3 consecutive days prior to May 2019. After this timepoint patients routinely received fludarabine 40 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 for 2 consecutive days. Clinical data from each cohort were obtained from the electronic medical record and compared for differences in CAR T-cell efficacy and toxicity. Results: From June 2018 to August 2023, LDC was given to 92 patients prior to CD19 directed CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Twenty-eight patients received a 3-day regimen, and 64 patients received a 2-day regimen. In the total cohort, 75% of patients received axicabtagene ciloleucel and 25% received tisagenlecleucel. The overall response rates in both the 2-day regimen group and the 3-day regimen group were similar (69% vs 75%, p= 0.21) as were the complete response rates (50% vs 54%, p=0.82). There were no significant differences between the 2-day and 3-day regimens for grade 2-4 cytokine release syndrome (55% vs 50%, p=0.82), grade 2-4 immune effector cell associated-neurotoxicity syndrome (42% vs 29%, p=0.25), or time to resolution of neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. The rate of prolonged platelet recovery lasting greater than 60 days was higher with the 3-day regimen (9% vs 27%, p=0.026). Discussion: As the number of patients eligible for CAR T-cell therapy continues to increase, optimizing each component of therapy is necessary. We show that a 2-day regimen of LDC with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide is feasible without significant impact on CAR T-cell efficacy or toxicity. Prospective studies are necessary to further determine the most effective LDC regimen.

Outcomes of Rituximab-abbs versus Rituximab in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in a Noninferiority Study.

BACKGROUND: Rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is one of the first line treatments for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Rituximab comprises most of the treatment cost for this regimen; therefore, biosimilars, such as rituximab-abbs are crucial to provide affordable care. Although rituximab-abbs was studied primarily in follicular lymphoma, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved this drug for all indications of the reference product on the basis of extrapolation. Effectiveness and safety data surrounding the use of rituximab-abbs in DLBCL is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rituximab-abbs and reference product rituximab as R-CHOP treatment for patients with DLBCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This noninferiority (NI) study compared the 2-year overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and incidence of adverse events (AEs) between rituximab-abbs and its reference product (RP) in R-CHOP among adult patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL. The study inclusion period was from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2020. Analyses were performed on the basis of a noninferiority lower limit of 10% for OS and ORR, and an upper limit of 10% for serious AEs. RESULTS: There were 240 patients who received RP rituximab, while 295 patients received rituximab-abbs. The cohort had a mean age of 63.7±12.2 years and 43% were female. The 2-year OS was 81.0% and 79.6% (NI p < 0.01) while the ORR was 80.0% and 69.6% (NI p < 0.01), among the rituximab-abbs and rituximab groups, respectively. The incidence of infusion reaction AEs (NI p < 0.01) and noninfusion reaction AEs (NI p < 0.01) also met noninferiority. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that rituximab-abbs was noninferior to rituximab in both effectiveness and safety among patients receiving R-CHOP for DLBCL in this study. Long-term follow-up would be needed to confirm these results.

Effectiveness of increasing the scalp cooling duration to prevent alopecia during adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a randomized pilot study.

PURPOSE: Alopecia is a common side-effect of chemotherapy and can be extremely distressing to patients. Scalp cooling can be used to reduce hair loss, but the optimal duration of cooling remains unclear. Our aim was to determine whether increasing the duration of scalp cooling improves hair preservation. METHODS: Patients with HER2-negative, non-metastatic, breast cancer received scalp cooling during adjuvant chemotherapy: three cycles of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by three cycles of paclitaxel. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A (n=18) wore a Paxman cooling cap during each infusion and for 30 min post-infusion while Group B (n=19) wore the cap from 30 min before to 2 h after each infusion. All patients were asked to complete a questionnaire recording hair loss/regrowth, adverse events, and quality of life. Success of treatment was defined as <50% hair loss. RESULTS: The success rates after each of the three cycles did not differ significantly between the two groups (EC: Group A: 40%, Group B: 44%; paclitaxel: Group A: 50%, Group B: 36%; p>0.05). Hair regrowth was significantly higher in Group B at the 8-week follow-up, but not at the 6-month follow-up. Head discomfort affected more patients in Group B than in Group A during the first session (94% vs. 62%, respectively; p=0.039). CONCLUSION: Long duration scalp cooling during chemotherapy might increase patients' discomfort and does not appear to improve hair preservation.

Brentuximab vedotin therapy followed by autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation as a viable treatment option for an older adult with transformed lymphoma: a case report and literature review.

This report presents a case involving a woman aged >65 years who had been diagnosed with marginal zone lymphoma 3 years prior. The patient was hospitalized with enlarged inguinal lymph nodes, and pathological examination revealed that the lymphoma had transformed into diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. After two cycles of brentuximab vedotin in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (BV-R-CHP) chemotherapy, the patient achieved complete remission. This treatment was followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance therapy. At the last follow-up, the patient had been in continuous remission for 24 months. This case study suggests that the utilization of BV and R-CHP in conjunction can result in rapid remission, and it can be followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and maintenance therapy with lenalidomide. This treatment approach exhibits potential as a viable option for older individuals with transformed lymphoma.

Addition of temsirolimus to chemotherapy in children, adolescents, and young adults with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (ARST1431): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial from the Children's Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: The Children's Oncology Group defines intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma as unresected FOXO1 fusion-negative disease arising at an unfavourable site or non-metastatic FOXO1 fusion-positive disease. Temsirolimus in combination with chemotherapy has shown promising activity in patients with relapsed or refractory rhabdomyosarcoma. We aimed to compare event-free survival in patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma treated with vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with vincristine and irinotecan (VAC/VI) combined with temsirolimus followed by maintenance therapy versus VAC/VI alone with maintenance therapy. METHODS: ARST1431 was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial conducted across 210 institutions in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the USA. Eligible patients were those aged 40 years or younger with non-metastatic FOXO1-positive rhabdomyosarcoma or unresected FOXO1-negative rhabdomyosarcoma disease from unfavourable sites. Two other groups of patients were also eligible: those who had FOXO1-negative disease at a favourable site (excluding orbit) that was unresected; and those who were aged younger than 10 years with stage IV FOXO1-negative disease with distant metastases. Eligible patients had to have a Lansky performance status score of 50 or higher if 16 years or younger and a Karnofsky performance status score of 50 or higher if older than 16 years; all patients were previously untreated. Patients were randomised (1:1) in blocks of four and stratified by histology, stage, and group. Patients received intravenous VAC/VI chemotherapy with a cyclophosphamide dose of 1·2 g/m2 per dose per cycle with or without a reducing dose of intravenous weekly temsirolimus starting at 15 mg/m2 or 0·5 mg/kg per dose for those who weighed less than 10 kg. The total duration of therapy was 42 weeks followed by 6 months of maintenance therapy with oral cyclophosphamide plus intravenous vinorelbine for all patients. Temsirolimus was withheld during radiotherapy and for 2 weeks before any major surgical procedure. The primary endpoint was 3-year event-free survival. Data were analysed with a revised intention-to-treat approach. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02567435) and is complete. FINDINGS: Between May 23, 2016, and Jan 1, 2022, 325 patients were enrolled. In 297 evaluable patients (148 assigned to VAC/VI alone and 149 assigned to VAC/VI with temsirolimus), the median age was 6·3 years (IQR 3·0-11·3); 33 (11%) patients were aged 18 years or older; 179 (60%) of 297 were male. 113 (77%) of 148 patients were FOXO1 negative in the VAC/VI group, and 108 (73%) of 149 were FOXO1 negative in the VAC/VI with temsirolimus group. With a median follow-up of 3·6 years (IQR 2·8-4·5), 3-year event-free survival did not differ significantly between the two groups (64·8% [95% CI 55·5-74·1] in the VAC/VI group vs 66·8% [57·5-76·2] in the VAC/VI plus temsirolimus group (hazard ratio 0·86 [95% CI 0·58-1·26]; log-rank p=0·44). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were anaemia (62 events in 60 [41%] of 148 patients in the VAC/VI group vs 89 events in 87 [58%] of 149 patients in the VAC/VI with temsirolimus group), lymphopenia (83 events in 65 [44%] vs 99 events in 71 [48%]), neutropenia (160 events in 99 [67%] vs 164 events in 105 [70%]), and leukopenia (121 events in 86 [58%] vs 132 events in 93 [62%]). There was one treatment-related death in the VAC/VI with temsirolimus group, categorised as not otherwise specified. INTERPRETATION: Addition of temsirolimus to VAC/VI did not improve event-free survival in patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma defined by their FOXO1 translocation status and clinical factors. Novel biology-based strategies are needed to improve outcomes in this population. FUNDING: The Children's Oncology Group (supported by the US National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health).

Combined oral low-dose cyclophosphamide endocrine therapy may improve clinical response among patients with metastatic breast cancer via Tregs in TLSs.

Despite limited research on refractory and/or endocrine therapy failure in elderly metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, a prior study showed that low-dose oral cyclophosphamide (CY) can improve the overall survival rate of MBC patients, possibly through the immunoregulation of regulatory T cells (Tregs). We preliminarily investigated the combination of endocrine therapy (ET) with oral low-dose CY as salvage therapy in elderly patients via peripheral blood regulatory T-cell analyses. In addition, we evaluated the associations of tumor tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) with therapeutic outcomes. HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients who received low-dose CY combined with ET or ET only from April 2015 to August 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The primary outcome was the clinical control rate (CCR), and the secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Circulating T lymphocyte subpopulations represented by Tregs were monitored during treatment by flow cytometry methods. TLSs wereconfirmed by hematoxylin-eosin staining of pretreatment specimens, and CD3, CD4, and Foxp3 were detected using Opal multicolor immunofluorescence. A total of 85 patients who received CY + ET and 50 patients who received ET only were enrolled, the percentage of patients who received CCR was 73% (62/85) vs. 70% (45/50), and the objective response rate (ORR) was 28% (24/85) vs. 24% (12/50). No deaths occurred during the study period. The mean PFS time was 13 vs. 11 months (P = 0.03). In the CY + ET group, decreases in CD4+/CD25+/Foxp3+ T cells (P < 0.001) were favorable for both clinical control and prolonged PFS (P < 0.001). Compared with patients without TLSs, those with TLSs were more likely to have better clinical control and PFS (mean time = 6 months), and a greater number of Treg cells during TLS pretreatment correlated with longer PFS (P = 0.043). Oral low-dose CY combined with standard ET exerts immunological effects by decreasing Treg levels to achieve improved clinical responses. Moreover, patients with TLSs might benefit more from such therapy than those without TLSs, and a high Treg cell count in TLSs before treatment predicts better therapeutic efficacy.

[Primary renal triple expressor DLBCL treated with chemotherapy under continuous hemodialysis and filtration support].

A 69-year-old woman was previously treated with antibiotics for suspected pyelonephritis due to fever but showed limited improvement. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed heterogeneous areas of decreased contrast enhancement in both kidneys, along with an elevated soluble level of the IL-2 receptor (5,090 U/ml), and thus the patient was referred to our department for further evaluation. A percutaneous renal biopsy performed due to suspected malignant lymphoma confirmed lymphoma cell infiltration into the renal interstitium. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for MYC/BCL2/BCL6, leading to the diagnosis of stage IVB primary renal triple expressor diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Due to acute kidney injury, continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) was initiated, followed by rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy. The patient's renal function improved rapidly, and complete response was achieved after six cycles of R-CHOP. Although DLBCL is a common lymphoma, the primary renal subtype is extremely rare and poses both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This case highlights the potential clinical implications of combining CHDF with chemotherapy to achieve complete response despite an initial poor prognosis based on the patient's overall clinical condition and pathology.

Epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic profiles of mantle cell lymphoma cared for in a Moroccan center: a review of 14 cases.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) accounts for 3-10% of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). We identified 14 patients with mantle cell lymphoma, with an average number of 3.5 new cases/year. A male predominance was observed with a sex ratio equal to 6. The average age of our patients was 64.4±14.1 years, with an average diagnostic delay of 6.57 months. Regarding the clinical presentation, adenopathy was the most reported physical sign (78.6%) followed by B symptoms (57.1%). Disseminated stages were the most frequent in our series: stages IV (78.5%) and III (7.1%) versus stages I (0%) and II (7.1%). The extra-ganglionic localizations observed were hepatic 5 cases (31.1%), pulmonary 04 cases (25%), medullary 4 cases (25%), pleural 2 cases (12.5%) and prostate 1 case (6.2%). All diagnosed cases are mantle cell lymphomas, of which 12 cases (85.7%) are classical and 2 cases (14.3%) indolent. The high-risk group is, according to international prognostic index (MIPI) MCL prognostic score, the most represented in our series: 0-3 = 6 cases (42.9%), 6-11 = 8 cases (57.1%). The therapeutic protocol chosen 1st line: 9 patients treated with R-DHAP, three with R-CHOP, one with DHAOX and one with R-CVP. Second line: two patients treated with R-DHAP, one after R-CHOP and the other after R-CVP. Two patients received autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant at the end of the treatment. The evolution was marked by the death of 7 patients, 3 lost to follow-up and 4 still followed. Additionally, the study highlights characteristics and treatment patterns of mantle cell lymphoma, emphasizing its predominance in males, delayed diagnosis, frequent dissemination, and high-risk classification, with chemotherapy as the primary treatment modality and a challenging prognosis contributing to a comprehensive understanding of mantle cell lymphoma presentation and management.

[A Retrospective Study of R±DHAX Regimen versus R-CHOP Regimen First-Line Treatment of Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy and prognosis of Rituximab combined with DHAX and CHOP regimen in the first-line treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: A total of 36 elderly patients with DLBCL who were admitted and treated with 3 of more courses of treatment from August 2011 to August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into rituximab±DHAX (R±DHAX) regimen group (18 cases) and rituximab±CHOP (R-CHOP) regimen group (18 cases) according to the treatment plan, and clinical features, efficacy and survival of the patients were observed. RESULTS: Compared with R-CHOP group, patients of the R±DHAX group were older, and had worse performance status and higher IPI score, the differences between two groups in age, ECOG score and IPI score were statistically significant ( P =0.005 P =0.018, P =0.035), but there were no significant differences beween two groups in gender, whether there were B symptoms, whether LDH was elevated, whether there was extranodal involvement, cell origin, bone marrow infiltration, and whether rituximab was combined ( P =0.738, P =1, P =0.315, P =0.305, P =0.413, P =0.177, P =0.711, P =0.229). The efficacy could be evaluated in 36 cases, including CR 14 (38.9%), PR 17 (47.2%), PD 5 (13.9%), and ORR of 86.1% (31/36). There were no statistically significant differences in CRï¼»(27.8%（5/18） vs 50.0%（9/18）; P >0.05ï¼½ and PR ï¼»44.4%（8/18） vs 50.0%（9/18）; P >0.05ï¼½ of R±DHAX group and R-CHOP group, there was statistically significant difference in ORRï¼»72.2%（13/18） vs 100.0%（18/18）; P =0.045ï¼½ between two groups. The 1-year OS of R±DHAX group and R-CHOP group was (38.9±11.5%)% and (94.4±7.4%)%, respectively, 2-year OS was (16.7±8.8)% and (72.2±10.6)%, respectively, and the differences between two groups were statistically significant ( P =0.001, P =0.002). The median survival time in the R±DHAX group was 11 months(95%CI :8.9-13.1), and the median survival time in the R-CHOP group was not reached, and there was a statistically significant difference between the groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For elderly DLBCL patients, R±DHAX may not be superior to R-CHOP in OS, and ECOG score, IPI score and age may affect the survival of elderly DLBCL patients. However, R±DHAX regimen is safe, tolerable and has a certain efficacy, which can be used as one of the clinical treatment options for elderly DLBCL.

[Current state of graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with PTCy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation].

There is growing recognition of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as the new standard prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in HLA-matched peripheral blood stem cell transplants with reduced intensity conditioning, based on recent results of randomized phase III trials of PTCy. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with PTCy is thought to have GVHD-dependent and -independent graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effects. Its GVHD-dependent effects may be attenuated by PTCy-induced alloreactive T cell dysfunction and preferential recovery of regulatory T cells after HCT, but its GVT effects do not appear to be significantly impaired in patients in remission or with indolent disease. As patients not in remission are often also candidates for transplantation in Japan, it will be necessary to use PTCy as a platform to establish a strategy that could also be effective in patients not in remission and to revise the donor selection algorithm.

Dual T-cell depletion with individually tailored anti-thymocyte globulin and attenuated dose of post-transplant cyclophosphamide in haploidentical peripheral stem cell transplantation.

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of dual T-cell suppression using individually tailored doses of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and attenuated dose of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). We conducted a retrospective analysis of 78 adults with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who underwent haplo-HSCT using intravenous busulfan and fludarabine conditioning. Thirty-two patients received attenuated ATG/PTCy, while 46 patients received ATG (7.5 mg/kg) as GVHD prophylaxis. The 100-day cumulative incidence of grade III-IV (9.7% vs. 32.4%, P = 0.018) acute GVHD, as well as 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD (13.9% vs. 43.9%, P = 0.018) in the ATG/PTCy group were significantly lower than those in the ATG group. The 2-year overall survival was comparable between the two groups. However, 2-year GVHD-free, relapse-free survival in the ATG/PTCy group was significantly higher compared to that in the ATG group (38.9% vs. 21.7%, P = 0.021). Moreover, during post-engraftment period, the ATG/PTCy group exhibited lower incidences of life-threatening bacterial (12.5% vs. 37%, P = 0.033) and viral infection (0% vs. 17.4%, P = 0.035) than the ATG group. In conclusion, the combination of individually tailored ATG and low-dose PTCy appears to be a promising strategy in haplo-HSCT.

Mycophenolate Mofetil with Steroid, a Reasonable Alternative to Current First-line Therapy, for Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy in Resource-constrained Settings: A Randomized, Open-label Study.

BACKGROUND: The modified Ponticelli regimen (mPR) is a first-line therapy in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN); however, it has a less favorable safety profile. Though mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + steroid (S) is not recommended by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines, it can be used as an alternative to mPR due to higher tolerability and steroid-sparing effect. Thus, we compared the safety and effectiveness of MMF + S and mPR regimens in patients with IMN. METHODS: This randomized, open-label study enrolled patients with adult-onset nephrotic syndrome (NS) and biopsy-proven IMN. Forty-two patients were allocated to MMF + S group (MMF 1 gm twice daily + oral prednisolone 0.5 mg/kg/day; n = 21) and mPR group [methylprednisolone (1 gm intravenous) for 3 days followed by alternating monthly cycles of oral prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/day) for the next 27 days and cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg/day) for 6 months; n = 21]. The primary outcome measure was change in urinary protein creatinine ratio (UPCR). RESULTS: At 6 months, both groups demonstrated a significant increase in serum albumin levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (both p-values <0.0001) as well as a decrease in 24-hour proteinuria (MMF + S group: p-value = 0.003, and mPR group: p-value <0.0001) and UPCR (both p-values <0.0001). However, the groups did not differ in any of these parameters at any of the monthly follow-up visits. Moreover, the groups did not differ significantly in terms of the composite remission rates (61.91% for MMF + S group and 71.43% for mPR group). CONCLUSION: MMF + S and mPR had comparable tolerability and effectiveness, with MMF-associated advantage of reduced steroid exposure.

Taxane combined with lobaplatin or anthracycline for neoadjuvant chemotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized, controlled, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that the addition of platinum to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improved outcomes for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, no studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of the combination of taxane and lobaplatin. In this study, we conducted a randomized controlled phase II clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of taxane combined with lobaplatin or anthracycline. METHODS: We randomly allocated patients with stage I-III TNBC into Arm A and Arm B. Arm A received six cycles of taxane combined with lobaplatin (TL). Arm B received six cycles of taxane combined with anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (TEC) or eight cycles of anthracycline combined with cyclophosphamide and sequential use of taxane (EC-T). Both Arms underwent surgery after NAC. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints were event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients (51 in Arm A and 52 in Arm B) were assessed. The pCR rate of Arm A was significantly higher than that of Arm B (41.2% vs. 21.2%, P = 0.028). Patients with positive lymph nodes and low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) benefited significantly more from Arm A than those with negative lymph nodes and high NLR (Pinteraction = 0.001, Pinteraction = 0.012, respectively). There was no significant difference in EFS (P = 0.895) or OS (P = 0.633) between the two arms. The prevalence of grade-3/4 anemia was higher in Arm A (P = 0.015), and the prevalence of grade-3/4 neutropenia was higher in Arm B (P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant taxane plus lobaplatin has shown better efficacy than taxane plus anthracycline, and both regimens have similar toxicity profiles. This trial may provide a reference for a better combination strategy of immunotherapy in NAC for TNBC in the future.

Subcutaneous Panniculitis-like T Cell Lymphoma Diagnosed with a Slowly Progressive Course: A Case Report.

Panniculitis is an inflammation that occurs in subcutaneous adipose tissue. Panniculitis includes physical panniculitis (e.g., traumatic) and infectious panniculitis (e.g., bacterial, fungal, subcutaneous panniculitis-like T cell lymphoma [SPCTL], etc.). Accurate diagnosis is crucial due to similar clinical presentation of all types of panniculitis. Here, we report a case of SPCTL which was initially diagnosed with traumatic panniculitis. A 15-year-old male patient was admitted to a previous hospital due to a progressively enlarged right flank and inguinal mass after an abdominal bruise. He was initially diagnosed with traumatic panniculitis, but the mass expanded throughout the chest and abdomen accompanied by a fever of over 11 months. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a subcutaneous mass in the anterior chest and abdominal wall. Fludeoxyglucose F18 (FDG) uptake was observed at those lesions using FDG-positron emission tomography (PET). A biopsy of the mass lesion was performed, during which SPCTL was diagnosed based on pathological examination. He was initially treated with prednisolone and cyclosporine A for two weeks. His fever went down, but subcutaneous mass in the chest and abdominal wall persisted. Therefore, he received a cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen. After 6 courses of CHOP, CT revealed no disease evidence. He remained in complete remission at 30 months of therapy.

Daratumumab, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible myeloma: AMaRC 03-16.

ABSTRACT: In newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma, daratumumab has improved outcomes when added to the standard-of-care regimens. In a randomized trial, we tested whether similar improvements would be observed when daratumumab was added to the bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VCD) regimen. Transplant-ineligible patients with untreated myeloma were randomized to receive VCD or VCD plus daratumumab (VCDD). A total of 121 patients were randomized: 57 in the VCD arm and 64 in the VCDD arm. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the 2 arms. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.3-21.7) and 25.8 months (95% CI, 19.9-33.5) in the VCD and VCDD arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.67; log-rank test P = .066). In a preplanned analysis, it was demonstrated that the daratumumab-containing arm showed a significant improvement in PFS from 18 months onward, based on estimates at fixed time points after randomization. The proportions of patients who were progression-free at the following time points were: 18 months, 48% vs 68% (P = .0002); 24 months, 36% vs 52% (P = .0001); and 30 months, 27% vs 41% (P < .0001) in the VCD and VCDD arms, respectively. The best overall response and very good partial response rate were significantly higher in the daratumumab arm compared with the VCD and VCDD arms, respectively (65% vs 86%, P = .007; and 28% vs 52%, P = .009). Seventy-two percent of the VCDD patients completed the 9 cycles of induction therapy with no grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy adverse events. This study supports VCDD as an option for the initial treatment of transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma. This trial was registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000202369).

Assessment of efficacy and safety of dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC) in combination with immunotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess safety and efficacy of a modified KEYNOTE 522 protocol, which incorporated pembrolizumab every 6 weeks, allowing for concomitant dose-dense (14 day) doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC). By optimizing this dosing, the intention of this modified protocol was to improve pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in a population associated with a poorer prognosis. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. Patients were included if they had early stage, triple-negative breast cancer, and received at least one dose of AC. The entire cohort received neoadjuvant chemotherapy including weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel with pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for 12 weeks (4 cycles). The group then received either ddAC with pembrolizumab 400 mg every 6 weeks, or AC with pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. The primary objective was pCR rate at time of surgery. RESULTS: This study assessed outcomes in 25 patients over 34 months. The pCR rate in the pembrolizumab, AC 3-week cohort was 64.3% versus 81.8% in the ddAC and 6-week pembrolizumab group. No pembrolizumab-associated grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in the either cohort. Despite seeing an increased incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities in the ddAC arm, this did not result in additional chemotherapy delays or dose reductions. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated tolerability and a potential for favorable outcomes with this patient population, making this modified KEYNOTE 522 protocol a reasonable treatment approach. Larger, prospective studies are warranted to assess the feasibility of this dosing and true optimization of patient outcomes given the small sample size of this study.

Comparison of anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free regimens in neoadjuvant HER-2 positive breast cancer treatment.

While some clinics have adopted abbreviated neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer, there remains a shortage of comprehensive clinical data to support this practice. This is a retrospective, multicenter study. A total of 142 patients were included in the study who are HER2-positive breast cancer, aged ≤ 65 years, with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50%, received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent surgery at 10 different oncology centers in Türkiye between October 2016 and December 2022. The treatment arms were divided into 4-6 cycles of docetaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab for arm A, 4 cycles of adriamycin/cyclophosphamide followed by 4 cycles of taxane/TP for arm B. There were 50 patients (35.2%) in arm A and 92 patients (64.8%) in arm B. The median follow-up of all of the patients was 19.9 months (95% CI 17.5-22.3). The 3-year DFS rates for treatment arms A and B were 90.0% and 83.8%, respectively, and the survival outcomes between the groups were similar (p = 0.34). Furthermore, the pathologic complete response rates were similar in both treatment arms, at 50.0% and 51.1%, respectively (p = 0.90). This study supports shortened neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer, a common practice in some clinics.

First-line venetoclax combinations versus chemoimmunotherapy in fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (GAIA/CLL13): 4-year follow-up from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: In the primary analysis report of the GAIA/CLL13 trial, we found that venetoclax-obinutuzumab and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib improved undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD) rates and progression-free survival compared with chemoimmunotherapy in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. However, to our knowledge, no data on direct comparisons of different venetoclax-based combinations are available. METHODS: GAIA/CLL13 is an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study conducted at 159 sites in ten countries in Europe and the Middle East. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with a life expectancy of at least 6 months, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology group performance status of 0-2, a cumulative illness rating scale score of 6 or lower or a single score of 4 or lower, and no TP53 aberrations. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), with a computer-generated list stratified by age, Binet stage, and regional study group, to either chemoimmunotherapy, venetoclax-rituximab, venetoclax-obinutuzumab, or venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib. All treatments were administered in 28-day cycles. Patients in the chemoimmunotherapy group received six cycles of treatment, with patients older than 65 years receiving intravenous bendamustine (90 mg/m2, days 1-2), whereas patients aged 65 years or younger received intravenous fludarabine (25 mg/m2, days 1-3) and intravenous cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2, days 1-3). Intravenous rituximab (375 mg/m2, day 1 of cycle 1; 500 mg/m2, day 1 of cycles 2-6) was added to chemotherapy. In the experimental groups, patients received daily venetoclax (400 mg orally) for ten cycles after a 5-week ramp-up phase starting on day 22 of cycle 1. In the venetoclax-rituximab group, intravenous rituximab (375 mg/m2, day 1 of cycle 1; 500 mg/m2, day 1 of cycles 2-6) was added. In the obinutuzumab-containing groups, obinutuzumab was added (cycle 1: 100 mg on day 1, 900 mg on day 2, and 1000 mg on days 8 and 15; cycles 2-6: 1000 mg on day 1). In the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group, daily ibrutinib (420 mg orally, from day 1 of cycle 1) was added until undetectable MRD was reached in two consecutive measurements (3 months apart) or until cycle 36. The planned treatment duration was six cycles in the chemoimmunotherapy group, 12 cycles in the venetoclax-rituximab and the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group and between 12 and 36 cycles in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group. Coprimary endpoints were the undetectable MRD rate in peripheral blood at month 15 for the comparison of venetoclax-obinutuzumab versus standard chemoimmunotherapy and investigator-assessed progression-free survival for the comparison of venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib versus standard chemoimmunotherapy, both analysed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients randomly assigned to treatment) with a split α of 0·025 for each coprimary endpoint. Both coprimary endpoints have been reported elsewhere. Here we report a post-hoc exploratory analysis of updated progression-free survival results after a 4-year follow-up of our study population. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02950051, recruitment is complete, and all patients are off study treatment. FINDINGS: Between Dec 13, 2016, and Oct 13, 2019, 1080 patients were screened and 926 were randomly assigned to treatment (chemoimmunotherapy group n=229; venetoclax-rituximab group n=237; venetoclax-obinutuzumab group n=229; and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group n=231); mean age 60·8 years (SD 10·2), 259 (28%) of 926 patients were female, and 667 (72%) were male (data on race and ethnicity are not reported). At data cutoff for this exploratory follow-up analysis (Jan 31, 2023; median follow-up 50·7 months [IQR 44·6-57·9]), patients in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group had significantly longer progression-free survival than those in the chemoimmunotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·47 [97·5% CI 0·32-0·69], p<0·0001) and the venetoclax-rituximab group (0·57 [0·38-0·84], p=0·0011). The venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group also had a significantly longer progression-free survival than the chemoimmunotherapy group (0·30 [0·19-0·47]; p<0·0001) and the venetoclax-rituximab group (0·38 [0·24-0·59]; p<0·0001). There was no difference in progression-free survival between the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib and venetoclax-obinutuzumab groups (0·63 [0·39-1·02]; p=0·031), and the proportional hazards assumption was not met for the comparison between the venetoclax-rituximab group versus the chemoimmunotherapy group (log-rank p=0·10). The estimated 4-year progression-free survival rate was 85·5% (97·5% CI 79·9-91·1; 37 [16%] events) in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group, 81·8% (75·8-87·8; 55 [24%] events) in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group, 70·1% (63·0-77·3; 84 [35%] events) in the venetoclax-rituximab group, and 62·0% (54·4-69·7; 90 [39%] events) in the chemoimmunotherapy group. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse event was neutropenia (114 [53%] of 216 patients in the chemoimmunotherapy group, 109 [46%] of 237 in the venetoclax-rituximab group, 127 [56%] of 228 in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group, and 112 [48%] of 231 in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group). Deaths determined to be associated with study treatment by the investigator occurred in three (1%) patients in the chemoimmunotherapy group (n=1 due to each of sepsis, metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, and Richter's syndrome), none in the venetoclax-rituximab and venetoclax-obinutuzumab groups, and four (2%) in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group (n=1 due to each of acute myeloid leukaemia, fungal encephalitis, small-cell lung cancer, and toxic leukoencephalopathy). INTERPRETATION: With more than 4 years of follow-up, venetoclax-obinutuzumab and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib significantly extended progression-free survival compared with both chemoimmunotherapy and venetoclax-rituximab in previously untreated, fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, thereby supporting their use and further evaluation in this patient group, while still considering the higher toxicities observed with the triple combination. FUNDING: AbbVie, Janssen, and F Hoffmann-La Roche.

BeEAM vs. BEAM: evaluating conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether BeEAM is an alternative to BEAM for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: Data of 60 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who underwent ASCT from January 2018 to June 2023 in our center, including 30 patients in the BeEAM group and 30 patients in the BEAM group, were retrospectively analyzed. The time to hematopoietic reconstitution, treatment-related adverse events, number of hospitalization days, hospitalization cost, and survival benefit were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The clinical characteristics of the patients did not significantly differ between the two groups. The median number of reinfused CD34 + cells was 5.06 × 106/kg and 5.17 × 106/kg in the BeEAM and BEAM groups, respectively, which did not significantly different (p = 0.8829). In the BeEAM and BEAM groups, the median time to neutrophil implantation was 10.2 and 10.27 days, respectively (p = 0.8253), and the median time to platelet implantation was 13.23 and 12.87 days, respectively (p = 0.7671). In the BeEAM and BEAM groups, the median hospitalization duration was 30.37 and 30.57 days, respectively (p = 0.9060), and the median hospitalization cost was RMB 83,425 and RMB 96,235, respectively (p = 0.0560). The hospitalization cost was lower in the BeEAM group. The most common hematologic adverse events were grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, whose incidences were similar in the two groups. The most common non-hematologic adverse events were ≤ grade 2 and the incidences of these events did not significantly differ between the two groups. Median overall survival was not reached in either group, with predicted 5-year overall survival of 72.5% and 60% in the BeEAM and BEAM groups, respectively (p = 0.5872). Five-year progression-free survival was 25% and 20% in the BeEAM and BEAM groups, respectively (p = 0.6804). CONCLUSION: As a conditioning regimen for relapsed or refractory DLBCL, BeEAM has a desirable safety profile and is well tolerated, and its hematopoietic reconstitution time, number of hospitalization days, and survival benefit are not inferior to those of BEAM. BeEAM has a lower hospitalization cost and is an alternative to BEAM.