Low-dose adjuvant vaginal cylinder brachytherapy for early-stage non-endometrioid endometrial cancer: recurrence risk and survival outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate recurrence patterns and survival outcomes for patients with early-stage non-endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma treated with adjuvant high-dose rate vaginal brachytherapy with a low-dose scheme. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I-II non-endometrioid endometrial cancer who received adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy with a low-dose regimen of 24 Gy in six fractions from November 2005 to May 2017. All patients had >6 months of follow-up. Rates of recurrence-free survival, overall survival, vaginal, pelvic, and distant recurrence were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival were evaluated by Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 49 months (range 9-119). Histologic subtypes were serous (47%, n=50), clear cell (10%, n=11), mixed (27%, n=29), and carcinosarcoma (15%, n=16). Most patients (79%) had stage IA disease, 94% had surgical nodal assessment, and 13% had lymphovascular invasion. Adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered to 75%. The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 74% and 83%, respectively. By histology, 5-year recurrence-free/overall survival rates were: serous 73%/78%, clear cell 68%/88%, mixed 88%/100%, and carcinosarcoma 56%/60% (p=0.046 and p<0.01). On multivariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion was significantly associated with recurrence (HR 3.3, p<0.01). The 5-year vaginal, pelvic, and distant recurrence rates were 7%, 8%, and 21%, respectively. Vaginal and pelvic recurrence rates were highest for patients with carcinosarcoma, lymphovascular invasion and/or FIGO stage IB/II disease. At 5 years, vaginal and pelvic recurrence rates for patients with lymphovascular invasion were 33% and 40%, respectively. Patients with stage IA disease or no lymphovascular invasion had 5-year vaginal recurrence rates of 4% and pelvic recurrence rates of 6% and 3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant high-dose rate brachytherapy with a low-dose scheme is effective for most patients with early-stage non-endometrioid endometrial cancer, particularly stage IA disease and no lymphovascular invasion. Pelvic radiation therapy should be considered for those with carcinosarcoma, lymphovascular invasion and/or stage IB/II disease.

Off-study utilization of experimental therapies: Analysis of GOG249-eligible cohorts using real world data.

OBJECTIVE: Adjuvant management of women with high-intermediate- and high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer remains controversial. Recently published results of GOG 249 revealed that vaginal brachytherapy plus chemotherapy (VBT + CT) was not superior to whole pelvic radiation therapy (WPRT) and was associated with more toxicities and higher nodal recurrences. This study examined off-study utilization of VBT + CT among women who met criteria for GOG 249 in the period prior to study publication. METHODS: Women diagnosed with FIGO IA-IIB endometrioid, serous, or clear cell uterine cancer between 2004-2015 and treated with hysterectomy and radiotherapy (RT) were identified in the National Cancer Database. Cochrane-Armitrage trend test was used to assess trends over time. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to calculate odds ratio (OR) of VBT + CT receipt and hazard ratio (HR) of OS. Propensity-score matched analysis was conducted to account for baseline differences. RESULTS: 9956 women met inclusion criteria. 7548 women (75.8%) received WPRT while 2408 (24.2%) received VBT + CT in the study period. From 2004-2015, there was a significant increase in VBT + CT use (p < 0.001) with the largest overall increase occurring in 2009 to 22%. Factors significantly associated with VBT + CT receipt included higher socioeconomic status (p < 0.001), higher grade endometrioid cancer (p < 0.001), and aggressive histology (p < 0.001). After propensity-score matching, VBT + CT was associated with improved OS (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.93); however, when stratified by FIGO stage, VBT + CT was only associated with improved OS for FIGO stage 1B (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: There was significant use of experimental arm off-study treatment in the United States prior to report of GOG 249 results. Providers should be cautious when offering off-study treatment utilizing an experimental regimen given uncertainty about efficacy and toxicity.

Adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy and chemotherapy versus pelvic radiotherapy in early-stage endometrial cancer: Outcomes by risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: To report on patterns of care as well as evaluate the two treatment regimens using a large retrospective hospital-based registry to identify possible subgroups of patients who may experience benefit with VBT + CT vs. EBRT. METHODS: Patients from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were identified who met the inclusion criteria for GOG 249 and were treated with either VBT + CT or WPRT. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment factors were collected. Association of treatment type and other variables with overall survival was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards model. Subset analyses were performed based on a variety of risk factors, including high risk pathologies, surgical nodal sampling, and grade. RESULTS: A total of 4,602 patients were included in the analysis, with 41% receiving VBT + CT and 59% receiving WPRT. For the entire cohort, VBT + CT was associated with improved survival, with 3-year overall survival 89.6% vs. 87.8% (hazard ratio 1.24, 95%CI 1.01-1.52, p = 0.04). On subset analysis, patients with serous histology experienced benefit with VBT + CT, while high-grade endometrial patients without lymph node dissection experienced improved survival associated with EBRT. After exclusion of serous histology, there was no survival difference associated with treatment type. CONCLUSIONS: VBT + CT was associated with superior survival outcomes in patients with early-stage serous carcinoma. For non-serous histology, treatment modality was not associated with a difference in survival, although patients with high-grade disease and no nodal dissection experienced benefit from EBRT.

Exceptional response to chemotherapy followed by concurrent radiotherapy and immunotherapy in a male with primary retroperitoneal serous Adenocarcinoma: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Primary retroperitoneal serous adenocarcinoma (PRSA) is an extremely uncommon malignancy exclusively reported in females. Due to the rarity of the disease, it is difficult to establish a standardized treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a unique case of PRSA in a 71-year-old male who presented with right-sided lower back pain and numbness. Magnetic resonance imaging identified a mass invading the adjacent psoas muscle and twelfth rib. Tissue biopsy confirmed poorly differentiated PRSA. Patient was initially treated with neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy regimen. This resulted in complete radiological resolution of the tumor. However, 12 weeks later, rapid recurrence was noted on follow-up CT scan. The patient was then treated with external radiotherapy with concurrent nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody. The patient displayed a positive response to treatment with reduction in primary tumor and metastases and had a sustained disease control. CONCLUSION: Treatment with radiotherapy in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody could be an effective modality of management for PRSA.

Adjuvant Pelvic Radiation "Sandwiched" Between Paclitaxel/Carboplatin Chemotherapy in Women With Completely Resected Uterine Serous Carcinoma: Long-term Follow-up of a Prospective Phase 2 Trial.

OBJECTIVE: We prospectively evaluated patients with completely resected uterine serous carcinoma (USC) treated with radiation "sandwiched" between carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/T). The primary objective was to determine the safety profile, and the secondary outcome was to evaluate progression-free and overall survival. METHODS: Surgically staged patients with completely resected USC were enrolled to receive 3 cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m and carboplatin (area under the curve, 6-7.5) every 21 days, followed by radiotherapy and an additional 3 cycles of T/C at area under the curve of 5-6 (6 cycles + radiotherapy). Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 4.03. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to compare survival probabilities. RESULTS: One hundred forty patients were enrolled, of which 132 were evaluable, completed at least 3 cycles of chemotherapy and radiation. One hundred seven (81%) completed 6 cycles of chemotherapy and radiation. Patients with early-stage (I/II) disease have survival probabilities of 0.96 and 0.81 at 2 and 5 years. Patients with stage I USC and lymphovascular invasion have considerably worse overall survival, with 2.7 times' higher risk of death than those without lymphovascular invasion. Patients with late-stage (III/IV) disease had overall survival probabilities of 0.64 and 0.18 at 2 and 5 years, which is far higher survival than what has been reported in single-modality trials. Interestingly, and different than what is reported in other studies, there is no difference in survival in African Americans versus whites/other races who were evaluable. Of the 779 cycles administered, 22% and 14% of cycles were associated with grades 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities, respectively. Grades 3 and 4 nonhematologic toxicities occurred in 6.9% of cycles. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term follow-up in this study demonstrates that "sandwich" therapy is an efficacious, well-tolerated treatment approach with acceptable toxicities. Lymphovascular invasion (LVSI) is a significantly poor prognostic factor in stage I USC. Multimodal "sandwich" therapy should be considered in all USC patients who have undergone complete surgical resection and staging.

Uterine serous carcinoma: Reassessing effectiveness of platinum-based adjuvant therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Two randomized trials failed to demonstrate efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy (PbCT) for uterine serous carcinoma (USC). Our objective was to reassess the value of PbCT for patients with microscopic residuum (R0). METHODS: Progression-free survival (PFS) after surgery was analyzed for 409 patients and correlated with adjuvant therapies: vaginal brachytherapy (VBRT), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), PbCT, or combinations. RESULTS: The estimated 5-year PFS for stage I (n=209) USC was 65.1% for observation only; 90.7%, VBRT only; and 91.1%, PbCT±VBRT (85% received VBRT); VBRT significantly (P=.004) impacted PFS, but the added value of PbCT remains uncertain. Of 58 stage IIIC, PbCT-treated patients (±EBRT), 5-year PFS was 33.9%; most failures had a vascular disseminated component. Median PFS for 72 stage IV, PbCT-treated patients was 18.6months for R0; 8.0, R1≤1cm residual disease; and 4.6, R2>1cm (P=.008). The progression rate (PR) during 1 to 2year follow-up for R0 was similar to PR during 0-1year follow-up for R1 (P=.31), suggesting recurrences in patients with R0 disease before 2years are likely platinum resistant. PRs during follow-up were nearly identical for R0≥2years and R1≥1year (P=.95), presumably showing limited numbers of platinum-sensitive tumors. CONCLUSIONS: A comparison of PR for patients treated with PbCT for stage IV R0 and R1 disease suggested that a 1-year lag interval precedes clinical recognition of PbCT refractory/resistant R0 disease. Most patients treated with PbCT who had microscopic residuum had recurrences within 2years (across stages), emphasizing the need for more effective therapy.

Haemoglobin monitoring in endometrial cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the level of anaemia monitoring and to determine the prevalence of anaemia in patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) undergoing postoperative pelvic radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: We evaluated 233 consecutive patients diagnosed with EC receiving RT in our institution between January 2011 and December 2015. One hundred and fifty-two patients (65.2%) received a combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) (mean dose 53.4 Gy, range 21-75), and 71 patients (30.5%) were exclusively treated with HDR-BT (mean dose 10.2 Gy, range 7-20). Blood test results with haemoglobin (Hb) levels were collected at three specific time points were: pre-RT (Hb1), during RT (Hb2) and post-RT (Hb3). Anaemia was defined as Hb <12 g/dL. RESULTS: Anaemia was detected in 54% of patients (67 patients) in the pre-RT analysis. Only 53.7% (n = 36) of the patients with anaemia detected pre-RT underwent subsequent Hb controls (during or post-RT). Blood tests were performed in 124 patients (53.20%) pre-RT, in 51 (17.59%) during RT and in 90 patients (38.62%) post-RT. Significant differences were observed between the mean Hb levels at Hb1-Hb3 (p = 0.001) and Hb2-Hb3 (p = 0.004). Patients with a pre-RT Hb level <12 g/dL presented a worse overall survival (OS) (p = 0.021, χ 2 5.3) with a mean OS of 53.39 months (range 45.5-61.3) vs. 61.4 (range 58.4-64.4) in patients with Hb ≥12 g/dL. CONCLUSION: Although the presence of anaemia is frequent in patients with EC (53.2% of patients affected at cancer diagnosis) and influences the OS, Hb monitoring in patients receiving RT remains suboptimal (no controls during RT in 46.3%). There is a strong need to pay attention to blood test prescription for all the patients during and after RT.

National Cancer Database Report of Lymphadenectomy Trends in Endometrial Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Lymph node involvement has a significant impact on prognosis that may direct adjuvant therapy. The role of routine lymph node staging (LNS) is controversial given conflicting results in multiple studies. Our aims are to describe treatment patterns of LNS, identify factors impacting LNS, and quantify the contemporary trends. METHODS/MATERIALS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometrioid and serous uterine carcinomas from 2003 to 2012. For endometrioid tumors, LNS was considered indicated if at least 1 of 4 criteria was met. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards model were used. RESULTS: A total of 161,683 patients were identified who received hysterectomy for 155,893 (96.4%) endometrioid and 5790 (3.6%) serous carcinomas. Receipt of LNS was significantly associated with greater than 50% myometrial invasion (odds ratio [OR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-1.73), grades 3 to 4 (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 2.83-3.25), and tumor size greater than 2 cm (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.28-1.26). Of the 97,152 patients with endometrioid carcinoma who met criteria for comprehensive staging, 73,268 (75.4%) underwent LNS. Patients with endometrioid carcinoma meeting criteria for LNS were less likely to receive LNS if they were of African American race (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98), had Medicaid insurance status (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81), had Medicare insurance (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.79-0.86), or received care at a community program (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.33-0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Nationally, most patients with greater than 50% myometrial invasion, grades 3 to 4, and/or tumor size greater than 2 cm receive LNS, but this was significantly impacted by insurance status, demographic characteristics, and facility location/type.

Utility of radiation therapy for early-stage uterine papillary serous carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Early-stage uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) has a poor prognosis and high recurrence rate. While adjuvant chemotherapy is generally recommended, the role of radiation is uncertain. We examined the association between vaginal brachytherapy and whole pelvic radiation and survival in women treated with and without adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify women with stage I-II UPSC treated between 1998 and 2012. Trends in use of chemotherapy, brachytherapy, and external beam radiation over time were examined. The association between these treatments and mortality were examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 7325 patients were identified. Overall, 2779 (37.9%) received chemotherapy. The use of vaginal brachytherapy increased from 7.2% in 1998 to 29.1% in 2012 (P<0.0001), while use of external beam radiation decreased from 18.2% to 11.7% over the same period (P<0.0001). Use of chemotherapy was associated with a 22% reduction in mortality (HR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.88). While brachytherapy was associated with decreased mortality (HR=0.67; 95% CI, 0.57-0.78), use of external beam radiation was not associated with survival (HR=1.03; 95% CI, 0.92-1.17). Stratified by stage, use of chemotherapy was associated with decreased mortality for women with stage IB and II tumors, but not for stage IA neoplasms. Vaginal brachytherapy was associated with reduced mortality for stage IA and II neoplasms. CONCLUSION: For women with early-stage UPSC, chemotherapy is associated with improved survival. Vaginal brachytherapy was also associated with improved survival, however, there was little benefit to use of external beam radiation.

Comparison of Survival Benefits of Combined Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Uterine Serous Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To date, there is no convincing evidence comparing the impact of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy with chemotherapy alone in postoperative uterine serous carcinoma (USC), which remains an unclear issue. We conducted a meta-analysis assessing the impact of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone on overall survival in postoperative USC. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in the databases of EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to March 2016. Studies comparing survival among patients who underwent combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone after surgery for USC were included. Quality assessments were carried out by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival was extracted, and a random-effects model was used for pooled analysis. Publication bias was assessed using both funnel plot and the Egger regression test. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 13.0 software. RESULT: Nine retrospective studies with relatively high quality containing 9354 patients were included for the final meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy significantly reduced the risk of death (HR, 0.72; P < 0.0001) compared to chemotherapy alone with a low heterogeneity (I = 21.0%, P = 0.256). Subgroup analyses indicated that calculating HR by unadjusted method may cause the heterogeneity among studies. Exploratory analyses showed that either patients with early stage disease (HR, 0.73; P = 0.011) or advanced stage disease (HR, 0.80; P < 0.0001) have survival benefits from combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. No significant evidence of publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first meta-analysis examining the role of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone in USC. Our results suggest the potential survival benefits of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Further studies, preferably randomized clinical trials, are needed to confirm our results.

Toxicity and quality of life after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: About 15% of patients with endometrial cancer have high-risk features and are at increased risk of distant metastases and endometrial cancer-related death. We designed the PORTEC-3 trial to investigate the benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer. METHODS: PORTEC-3 was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, international trial. Women with high-risk endometrial cancer were randomly allocated (1:1) to radiotherapy alone (48·6 Gy) in 1·8 Gy fractions five times a week or chemoradiotherapy (two cycles concurrent cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) and four adjuvant cycles of carboplatin area under the curve [AUC] 5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2)) using a biased coin minimisation procedure with stratification for participating centre, lymphadenectomy, stage of cancer, and histological type. The primary endpoints of the PORTEC-3 trial were overall survival and failure-free survival analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This analysis focuses on 2-year toxicity and health-related quality of life as secondary endpoints; analysis was done according to treatment received. Health-related quality of life was assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) the cervix cancer module and chemotherapy and neuropathy subscales of the ovarian cancer module at baseline, after radiotherapy and at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months after randomisation. Adverse events were graded with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. The study was closed on Dec 20, 2013, after achieving complete accrual, and follow-up remains ongoing for the primary outcomes analysis. This trial is registered with ISRCTN.com, number ISRCTN14387080, and with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00411138. FINDINGS: Between Sept 15, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013, 686 women were randomly allocated in the PORTEC-3 trial. Of these, 660 met eligibility criteria, and 570 (86%) were evaluable for health-related quality of life. Median follow-up was 42·3 months (IQR 25·8-55·1). At completion of radiotherapy and at 6 months, EORTC QLQ-C30 functioning scales were significantly lower (worse functioning) and health-related quality of life symptom scores higher (worse symptoms) for the chemoradiotherapy group compared with radiotherapy alone, improving with time. At 12 and 24 months, global health or quality of life was similar between groups, whereas physical functioning scores remained slightly lower in patients who received chemoradiotherapy compared with patients who received radiotherapy alone. At 24 months, 48 (25%) of 194 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group reported severe tingling or numbness compared with 11 (6%) of 170 patients in the radiotherapy alone group (p<0·0001). Grade 2 or worse adverse events were found during treatment in 309 (94%) of 327 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 145 (44%) of 326 patients in the radiotherapy alone group, and grade 3 or worse events were found in 198 (61%) of 327 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 42 (13%) of 326 patients in the radiotherapy alone group (p<0·0001), with most of the grade 3 adverse events being haematological (45%). At 12 and 24 months, no significant differences in grade 3 or worse adverse events were found between groups; only grade 2 or higher sensory neuropathy adverse events persisted at 24 months (25 [10%] of 240 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group vs one [<1%] of 247 patients in the radiotherapy alone group; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Despite the increased physician and patient-reported toxicities, this schedule of adjuvant chemotherapy given during and after radiotherapy in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer is feasible, with rapid recovery after treatment, but with persistence of patient-reported sensory neurological symptoms in 25% of patients. We await the analysis of primary endpoints before final conclusions are made. FUNDING: Dutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council, Project Grant, Cancer Australia Grant, Italian Medicines Agency, and Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.

Long-term Benefit of Tumor Volume-Directed Involved Field Radiation Therapy in the Management of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to report on long-term effectiveness of involved field radiation therapy (IFRT) in the salvage of localized recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 27 patients with a diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer who received tumor volume-directed IFRT for localized extraperitoneal recurrences (either as consolidation after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) or as attempted salvage if unresectable) forms the basis of this report. All patients were heavily pretreated with multiple chemotherapy regimens. Involved field radiation therapy was primarily with external beam (median dose, 50.4 Gy). Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was defined as freedom from in-field recurrences and was considered as a measure of effectiveness of radiotherapy. Statistical analyses evaluated association between disease-free survival, overall survival, LRFS, and various prognostic factors. Comparison was also made with a similar but unmatched cohort with localized recurrences salvaged by additional chemotherapy instead of local therapies (NIFRT group). RESULTS: Of 27 patients, 17 had optimal CRS before RT. The actuarial survival at 5 and 10 years (in parenthesis) from date of radiation were LRFS (70% and 60%), overall survival (30% and 19%), and disease-free survival (33% and 20%). None of the NIFRT patients survived beyond 5 years from initiation of salvage chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up in this selected series confirmed the benefit of IFRT (±CRS) in localized ROC. Chemotherapy salvage in a similar NIFRT group was not equivalent, suggesting a role for locoregional therapies in selected patients with ROC.

Patterns of care, associations and outcomes of chemotherapy for uterine serous carcinoma: analysis of the National Cancer Database.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate rates of chemotherapy and radiotherapy delivery in the treatment of uterine serous carcinoma, and compare clinical outcomes of treated and untreated patients. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients diagnosed with uterine serous carcinoma between 2003 and 2011. The impact of chemotherapy on survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors predictive of outcome were compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 13,752 patients met the study eligibility criteria. Stage I, II, III, and IV disease accounted for 4355 (31.7%), 1023 (7.4%), 3484 (25.3%), and 2451 (17.8%) of the study population, respectively. 2439 (17.7%) women had unknown stage. Chemotherapy was administered in 4290 (35.4%) patients, radiotherapy to 1673 (12.2%), adjuvant chemo-radiation to 2915 (21.2%), and 4874 (35.4%) of women did not receive adjuvant therapy during the study period. Utilization of chemotherapy became more frequent over time. Over the entire study period, after adjusting for age, period of diagnosis, race, facility location, facility type, insurance provider, socioeconomic status, comorbidity index, lymph node dissection, treatment modality, and stage, there was an association between treatment modality and survival, with the lowest hazard ratio in patients that received chemo-radiation. After adjusting for the same factors in women with stages I and II, chemo-radiation was associated with improved survival compared to patients that received no treatment. Radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone was not associated with improved survival. CONCLUSION: Utilization of chemotherapy is increased in this population over the study period from 2003-2012 and more importantly that survival, particularly in advanced stage patients, is improving.

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and pelvic radiation on pattern of recurrence and outcome in stage I non-invasive uterine papillary serous carcinoma. A multi-institution study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy or pelvic radiation on risk of recurrence and outcome in stage IA non-invasive uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC). METHODS: This is a multi-institutional retrospective study for 115 patients with stage IA non-invasive UPSC (confined to endometrium) treated between 2000 and 2012. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modeling were used. RESULTS: Staging lymphadenectomy and omentectomy were performed in 84% and 57% respectively. Recurrence was seen in 26% (30/115). Sites of recurrences were vaginal in 7.8% (9/115), pelvic in 3.5% (4/115) and extra-pelvic in 14.7% (17/115). Adjuvant chemotherapy did not impact risk of recurrence (25.5% vs. 26.9%, p=0.85) even in subset of patients who underwent lymphadenectomy (20% vs. 23.5%, p=0.80). These findings were consistent for pattern of recurrence. Among those who underwent lymphadenectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy did not impact progression-free survival (p=0.34) and overall survival (p=0.12). However among patients who did not have lymphadenectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy or pelvic radiation was associated with longer progression-free survival (p=0.04) and overall survival (p=0.025). In multivariable analysis, only staging lymphadenectomy was associated with improved progression-free survival (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.95, p=0.04) and overall survival (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-1.0, p=0.05). Neither adjuvant chemotherapy nor pelvic radiation were predictors of progression-free or overall survivals. CONCLUSION: In stage IA non-invasive UPSC, staging lymphadenectomy was significantly associated with recurrence and outcome and therefore, should be performed in all patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy or pelvic radiation had no impact on outcome in surgically staged patients but was associated with improved outcome in unstaged patients.

Survival of women with clear cell and papillary serous endometrial cancer after adjuvant radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Type II (papillary serous and clear cell) endometrial carcinoma (EC) is a rare subgroup and is considered to have an unfavorable prognosis. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to elucidate the meaning of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for clinical outcome and to define prognostic factors in these patients (pts). METHODS: From 2004-2012 forty-two pts with type II EC underwent surgery followed by adjuvant RT at our department. Median age was 72 years. The majority were early stage carcinomas (FIGO I n = 27 [64.3%], FIGO II n = 4 [9.5%], FIGO III n = 11 [26.2%]. Seven pts (16.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (ChT). Pts were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (IVB) boost. RESULTS: Five-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS), distant metastases free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were 85.4%, 78%, and 64.5% respectively. LRFS was better with lower pT stage, without lymphangiosis (L0), without haemangiosis (V0) and negative resection margins (R0). DMFS was prolonged in lymph node negatives (N0), L0, V0 and R0. OS was improved in younger pts, N0, L0, V0 and after lymphadenectomy (LNE). Multivariate analysis revealed haemangiosis (V1) as the only independent prognostic factor for OS (p = .014) and DMFS (p = .008). For LRFS pT stage remained as an independent prognostic factor (p = .028). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant RT with EBRT/IVB ensures adequate local control in type II EC, but control rates remain lower than in type I EC. A benefit of additional adjuvant ChT could not be demonstrated and a general omission of EBRT cannot be recommended at this point. Lymphovascular infiltration and pT stage might be the best predictive factors for a benefit from combined local and systemic treatment.

Long-term outcome and late side effects in endometrial cancer patients treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively reviewed the long-term outcome and late side effects of endometrial cancer (EC) patients treated with different techniques of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). METHODS: Between 1999 and 2012, 237 patients with EC were treated with PORT. Two-dimensional external beam radiotherapy (2D-EBRT) was used in 69 patients (30 %), three-dimensional EBRT (3D-EBRT) in 51 (21 %), and intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) with helical Tomotherapy in 47 (20 %). All patients received a vaginal brachytherapy (VB) boost. Seventy patients (29 %) received VB alone. RESULTS: After a median of 68 months (range, 6-154) of follow-up, overall survival was 75 % [95 % confidence interval (CI), 69-81], disease-free survival was 72 % (95% CI, 66-78), cancer-specific survival was 85 % (95 % CI, 80-89), and locoregional control was 86 % (95 % CI, 81-91). The 5-year estimates of grade 3 or more toxicity and second cancer rates were 0 and 7 % (95 % CI, 1-13) for VB alone, 6 % (95 % CI, 1-11) and 0 % for IMRT + VB, 9 % (95 % CI, 1-17) and 5 % (95 % CI, 1-9) for 3D-EBRT + VB, and 22 % (95 % CI, 12-32) and 12 % (95 % CI, 4-20) for 2D-EBRT + VB (P = 0.002 and P = 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic EBRT should be tailored to patients with high-risk EC because the severe late toxicity observed might outweigh the benefits. When EBRT is prescribed for EC, IMRT should be considered, because it was associated with a significant reduction of severe late side effects.

Patterns of relapse in stage I-II uterine papillary serous carcinoma treated with adjuvant intravaginal radiation (IVRT) with or without chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patterns of relapse in early stage uterine papillary carcinoma (UPSC) patients receiving adjuvant intravaginal radiotherapy (IVRT) with or without chemotherapy. METHODS: From 1/1996 to 12/2010, 77 women with stage I-II UPSC underwent surgery followed by IVRT (median 21Gy). Stage IA patients without residual disease at surgery were excluded. IVRT and chemotherapy (carboplatin/taxane) was given to 61 (79%) patients and IVRT alone to 16 (21%). The median follow-up was 62 months for surviving patients. RESULTS: Of the 77 patients, 11 (14%) relapsed as follows: vaginal 2 (3%), pelvic 5 (6%), para-aortic 5 (6%), peritoneal 6 (8%), and other distant sites 8 (10%). Of the 5 pelvic relapses, 2 were isolated and were salvaged. In those treated without chemotherapy, only 1/16 developed recurrence (mediastinal). The 5-year vaginal, pelvic, para-aortic, peritoneal, and distant recurrence rates were 2.7% (C.I. 0-6.2%), 5.8% (C.I. 0.6-11.0%), 5.4% (C.I. 0.6-10.1%), 5.3% (C.I. 0.5-10.1%) and 6.6% (C.I. 1.4-11.8%), respectively. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were 88% (C.I. 81-95%), and 91% (C.I. 84-97%), respectively. The only predictor of worse 5-year pelvic control was stage (96.2% stage IA vs 87.7% for stage IB-II, p=0.043). CONCLUSIONS: In stage I-II UPSC patients who predominantly receive adjuvant chemotherapy, IVRT as the sole form of adjuvant RT provides excellent locoregional control. The risk of isolated pelvic recurrence is too low to warrant routine use of external pelvic RT.

Less gastrointestinal toxicity after adjuvant radiotherapy on a small pelvic field compared to a standard pelvic field in patients with endometrial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Radiotherapy is associated with short-term and long-term morbidity. This study compared toxicity rates among patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) treated with adjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) on a small pelvic field (SmPF) in comparison with a standard pelvic field (StPF) or an extended field (EF). METHODS: Patients with EC preoperatively diagnosed with high-grade histological disease (grade 3 endometrioid, papillary serous, clear cell, and mixed tumor type) or cervical involvement were treated with total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymphadenectomy in the University Medical Center Groningen between 1999 and 2008. Patients who received adjuvant EBRT were included in this study. External beam radiation therapy on SmPF (includes only the central pelvis and proximal vagina) was applied in case of negative lymph nodes after adequate lymphadenectomy (≥10 lymph nodes removed at the bilateral obturator and external iliac nodal stations). In case of positive pelvic lymph nodes or inadequate lymphadenectomy, EBRT on StPF was given. External beam radiation therapy on EF was applied in case of common iliac and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases. Retrospectively, using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0, acute toxicity was scored during radiotherapy, whereas late toxicity was scored, from 3 months onward after treatment. RESULTS: Toxicity could be evaluated in 75 patients treated with SmPF (n = 33), StPF (n = 28), and EF EBRT (n = 14). Most patients with late adverse events had also reported toxicity during radiotherapy (71%). The most common late adverse events were gastrointestinal tract related, more frequently present in the StPF group (60.7%) compared to SmPF (33.3%; P = 0.032). In particular, nausea and anorexia were more frequent in the StPF group (32.1%) compared to the SmPF group (3.0%; P = 0.004), as well as ileus (14.3% vs 0%, P = 0.039, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with adjuvant EBRT on SmPF results in less gastrointestinal late adverse events compared to treatment with EBRT on StPF in patients with surgically staged EC.

Sexual function after intracavitary vaginal brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the effects of intracavitary brachytherapy (IVB) on sexual function and quality of life of women with early-stage endometrial cancer. METHODS: Women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I to stage II endometrial cancer treated surgically with or without IVB were identified and mailed questionnaires. Quality of life and sexual function were measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and the cervical cancer disease-specific module. Pertinent data from prior surgery and radiation treatments were abstracted retrospectively. Linear transformation of the survey subscale scores was conducted per European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer guidelines. RESULTS: Sixteen women in the IVB arm and 53 in the surgery-alone group completed the survey. Of the sexually active patients, 33% of the IVB patients and 42% of the surgery-alone patients felt their vagina was dry during sexual activity (P = 0.804) and 17% versus 20% felt their vagina was short (P = 0.884). Seventeen percent of patients in the IVB group felt their vagina was tight compared to 29% in the surgery-alone group (P = 0.891) and 0% versus 14% of patients reported pain during intercourse (P = 0.808). There was no statistically significant difference in sexual/vaginal functioning, sexual worry, or sexual enjoyment between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although both groups report vaginal changes that may affect sexual function, the patients treated with IVB reported similar outcomes on a sexual function questionnaire compared to patients treated with surgery alone.

Phase II trial of adjuvant pelvic radiation "sandwiched" between combination paclitaxel and carboplatin in women with uterine papillary serous carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and survival in women treated with adjuvant pelvic radiation "sandwiched" between six cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy with completely resected UPSC. METHODS: Surgically staged women with UPSC (FIGO stage 1-4) and no visible residual disease were enrolled. Treatment involved paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC=6.0-7.5) every 21 days for 3 doses, followed by radiation therapy (RT), followed by an additional 3 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin (AUC=5-6). Survival analysis, using Kaplan-Meier methods, was performed on patients who completed at least 3 cycles of chemotherapy and RT. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients were enrolled, of which 72 patients completed the first 3 cycles of chemotherapy followed by prescribed RT. Median age was 67 years (range: 43-82 years). 59/72 (82%) had disease confined to the uterus and 13/72 (18%) had completely resected extra-uterine disease (stage 3 and 4). 65 (83%) completed the protocol. Overall PFS and OS for combined stage 1 and 2 patients was 65.5 ± 3.6 months and 76.5 ± 4.3 months, respectively. PFS and OS for combined stage 3 and 4 patients was 25.8 ± 3.0 and 35.9 ± 5.3 months, respectively. Three-year % survival probability for stage 1 and 2 patients was 84% and for stage 3 and 4 patients was 50%. Of the 435 chemotherapy cycles administered, there were 11(2.5%) G3/G4 non-hematologic toxicities. 26(6.0%) cycles had dose reductions and 37(8.5%) had dose delays. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to prior studies of single modality adjuvant therapy, RT "sandwiched" between paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy is well-tolerated and highly efficacious in women with completely resected UPSC.