Effectiveness comparison and incremental cost-per-responder analysis of calcipotriene 0.005%/betamethasone dipropionate 0.064% foam vs. halobetasol 0.01%/tazarotene 0.045% lotion for plaque psoriasis: a matching-adjusted indirect comparative analysis.

Background: The fixed-dose combination foam formulation of calcipotriene 0.005% plus betamethasone dipropionate 0.064% (Cal/BD) has demonstrated efficacy and a favorable safety profile for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Recently, a topical lotion of the combination of halobetasol 0.01% plus tazarotene 0.045% (HP/TAZ) was approved for treating adult plaque psoriasis. Currently, no head-to-head studies have compared Cal/BD foam with HP/TAZ lotion.Objective: Compare the effectiveness and drug incremental cost per responder (ICPR) of Cal/BD foam vs. HP/TAZ lotion in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.Methods: An anchor-based, matching-adjusted indirect comparison was conducted for PGA treatment success (Physician's Global Assessment of "clear" or "almost clear," [PGA 0/1] with at least a 2-point improvement) using individual patient data from 3 randomized clinical studies of Cal/BD foam and published data from 2 randomized, Phase 3 clinical studies of HP/TAZ lotion. The number needed to treat and ICPR were also calculated.Results: After reweighting of patients in the Cal/BD foam studies to match summary baseline characteristics of the HP/TAZ lotion study patients and anchoring to vehicle effect, 4 weeks of Cal/BD foam produced a significantly greater rate of treatment success than 8 weeks of HP/TAZ lotion treatment (51.4 vs. 30.7%; treatment difference = 20.7%, p < .001). The number needed to treat with Cal/BD foam was also less than HP/TAZ lotion (1.9 vs. 3.3). Using US wholesale acquisition costs and equal weekly consumption rates, the incremental cost per PGA 0/1 responder relative to vehicle for Cal/BD foam was $3,988 and was 37% lower compared with HP/TAZ lotion ($6,294).Conclusions: The indirect comparison analyses showed that Cal/BD foam was associated with a greater rate of treatment success, lower ICPR, and quicker treatment response than HP/TAZ lotion in adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of all-trans retinoic acid/Clobetasol Propionate Compound Ointment in the treatment of mild to moderate psoriasis vulgaris: A randomized, single-blind, multicenter clinical trial.

To assess the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of all-trans retinoic acid/Clobetasol Propionate Compound Ointment and calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate ointment in the treatment of mild-to-moderate patients with psoriasis vulgaris. This was a randomized, single-blind, multicenter clinical trial. A total of 240 patients were randomized to receive twice-daily all-trans retinoic acid/Clobetasol Propionate Compound Ointment (treatment group) or once-daily calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate ointment (control group) for 4 weeks. The efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness were assessed at Weeks 2 and 4. After 4 weeks, both groups showed a significant clinical improvement compared to baseline (88.33% vs. 89.83%, respectively, p = .7112). But PASI 75 response in the treatment group was superior to the control group (44.12% vs. 28.57%, respectively, p = .0200), at Week 4. SSRI improvement rate in the treatment group was also superior to control group (67.11% vs. 59.43%, respectively, p = .0119) at Week 4. All-trans retinoic acid/Clobetasol Propionate Compound Ointment showed a significant clinical improvement in erythema, infiltration, and scales of skin lesions and PASI score compared to baseline. 1.67% of patients (treatment group) reported adverse reactions compared to 2.50% (control group) with no statistical significance. In addition, the cost-effectiveness assessment showed a higher cost-effectiveness of the treatment group compared to the control group in 4 weeks (199.25 vs. 801.51). All-trans retinoic acid/Clobetasol Propionate Compound Ointment was effective and safe in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris with similar efficacy as calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate ointment and lower treatment costs.

Cost-effectiveness evaluation of clobetasol propionate shampoo (CPS) maintenance in patients with moderate scalp psoriasis: a Pan-European analysis.

BACKGROUND: Scalp psoriasis is a difficult to treat and usually chronic manifestation of psoriasis. The CalePso study showed that CPS (Clobex(®) Shampoo) in maintenance therapy of scalp psoriasis (twice weekly) significantly increases the probability of keeping patient under remission during 6 months, compared with vehicle (40.3% relapses vs. 11.6% relapses, ITT). OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a maintenance therapy with CPS vs. its vehicle in nine European countries. METHODS: A 24-week decision tree model was developed with 4-weekly time steps. The considered population has moderate scalp psoriasis successfully treated with a daily application of CPS up to 4 weeks. Data were taken from the CalePso study and from national experts' recommendations for alternative treatment choices, with their probabilities of success taken from literature to develop country-specific models. Health benefits are measured in disease-free days (DFD). The economic analysis includes drug and physician costs. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PrSA) assesses the uncertainty of the model. RESULTS: Depending on the country, the mean total number of DFDs per patient is 21-42% higher with CPS compared with vehicle, and the mean total cost is 11-31% lower. The mean costs per DFD are 30-46% lower with CPS compared with the vehicle. The PrSA showed in 1000 simulations that CPS is more effective vs. vehicle in 100% of the cases and less expensive than its vehicle in 80-99% of the cases. CONCLUSION: This model suggests that CPS is cost-effective in maintaining the success achieved in moderate scalp psoriasis patients.

Medication formulation affects quality of life: a randomized single-blind study of clobetasol propionate foam 0.05% compared with a combined program of clobetasol cream 0.05% and solution 0.05% for the treatment of psoriasis.

For topical medications commonly used to treat dermatologic conditions, outcomes may be affected by the choice of delivery vehicles. The aim of this study was to compare quality of life (QOL), effectiveness, user satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness of 2 clobetasol regimens for the treatment of psoriasis over 14 days. In a single-blind design, 32 patients randomized into 2 groups applied either clobetasol foam 0.05% to the skin and scalp or combination clobetasol cream 0.05% to the skin and clobetasol solution 0.05% to the scalp. Psoriasis severity was measured using the standardized Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and self-administered PASI (SAPASI). QOL was assessed via the EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Cost-effectiveness was measured by the amount of medication used per body surface area (BSA) treated and by cost per point improvement in PASI score. In this study, a foam formulation performed better than a cream/solution combination by several measures. A greater absolute improvement in psoriasis severity was seen in the group using the foam than in the group using the cream/solution (mean decrease in PASI=5.0 vs 3.3, P=.05). The PASI score in the foam group decreased by 41% versus 35% in the cream/solution group (P=.17). In scalp psoriasis, the group using the foam had greater improvement in both absolute (P=.03) and percentage (P=.03) terms and than the solution group. When measuring global QOL, foam users had a significantly greater increase in EQ-5D than those using the cream/solution in absolute (P=.05, P=.02) and percentage (P=.04, P=.02) terms (first and second survey components, respectively). Differences in improvement of skin-specific QOL, quantified by DLQI scores between groups, were suggested but not statistically significant. Patients using foam spent less time applying medication compared with previous topical medications (P<.001). No significant difference in cost was appreciated between foam and cream/solution over the period after controlling for BSA (8.18 dollars vs 7.05 dollars per percentage BSA affected, P=.30).