RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a pivotal treatment for lymphoma patients. The BeEAM regimen (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) traditionally relies on cryopreservation, whereas the CEM regimen (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan) has been optimized for short-duration administration without the need for cryopreservation. This study rigorously compares the clinical and safety profiles of the BeEAM and CEM regimens. METHODS: A controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted with 58 lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT at the International Medical Center (IMC) in Cairo, Egypt. Patients were randomly assigned to either the BeEAM (n = 29) or CEM (n = 29) regimen, with an 18-month follow-up period. Clinical and safety outcomes were meticulously compared, focusing on time to engraftment for neutrophils and platelets, side effects, length of hospitalization, transplant-related mortality (TRM), and survival rates. RESULTS: The findings demonstrate a significant advantage for the CEM regimen. Neutrophil recovery was markedly faster in the CEM group, averaging 8.5 days compared to 14.5 days in the BeEAM group (p < 0.0001). Platelet recovery was similarly expedited, with 11 days in the CEM group versus 23 days in the BeEAM group (p < 0.0001). Hospitalization duration was substantially shorter for CEM patients, averaging 18.5 days compared to 30 days for those on BeEAM (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in the CEM group at 96.55% (95% CI: 84.91-99.44%) compared to 79.31% (95% CI: 63.11-89.75%) in the BeEAM group (p = 0.049). Progression-free survival (PFS) was also notably superior in the CEM group, at 86.21% (95% CI: 86.14-86.28%) versus 62.07% (95% CI: 61.94-62.20%) in the BeEAM group (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: The CEM regimen might demonstrate superiority over the BeEAM regimen, with faster neutrophil and platelet recovery, reduced hospitalization time, and significantly improved overall and progression-free survival rates. Future studies with longer duration and larger sample sizes are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the registration number NCT05813132 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05813132 ). (The first submitted registration date: is March 16, 2023).
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Carboplatino , Citarabina , Etopósido , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Linfoma , Melfalán , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante , Trasplante Autólogo , Humanos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Citarabina/administración & dosificación , Citarabina/efectos adversos , Citarabina/uso terapéutico , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Etopósido/efectos adversos , Etopósido/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Melfalán/efectos adversos , Melfalán/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Linfoma/terapia , Linfoma/mortalidad , Linfoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/efectos adversos , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Carboplatino/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtype with a significant relapse rate and poor prognosis in relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients. Polatuzumab vedotin in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (Pola-BR) has demonstrated promising efficacy and safety as salvage therapy for R/R DLBCL. This systematic review protocol aims to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of Pola-BR for the treatment of R/R DLBCL by synthesizing data from relevant randomized controlled trials. METHODS: This protocol details the eligibility criteria, search strategy, study selection, data extraction, and analysis methods for the systematic review. Randomized controlled trials comparing Pola-BR with other interventions for R/R DLBCL will be included. The primary endpoint is overall survival, with secondary endpoints being progression-free survival and incidence of adverse events. A comprehensive search will be conducted across databases such as Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, ProQuest, EU Clinical Trials Register, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and ClinicalTrials.gov from the January 2000 to April 2024. To assess the potential risk of bias, the Cochrane Risk of Bias 1 tool will be used. Data synthesis will utilize fixed-effect or random-effects models, and subgroup and meta-regression analyses will examine heterogeneity. Additionally, publication bias and sensitivity analyses will be performed, and the GRADE approach will be applied to assess the certainty of the evidence. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis protocol provides a rigorous framework for evaluating the efficacy of Pola-BR in the treatment of R/R DLBCL. The results will inform clinical decision-making and guideline development, addressing the unmet need for effective and tolerable treatments for this challenging patient population. Potential limitations and biases will be acknowledged, and future research directions will be discussed.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Rituximab , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/patología , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Inmunoconjugados/administración & dosificación , Inmunoconjugados/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Anticuerpos MonoclonalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fludarabine in combination with cyclophosphamide (FC) is the standard lymphodepletion regimen for CAR T-cell therapy (CAR T). A national fludarabine shortage in 2022 necessitated the exploration of alternative regimens with many centers employing single-agent bendamustine as lymphodepletion despite a lack of clinical safety and efficacy data. To fill this gap in the literature, we evaluated the safety, efficacy, and expansion kinetics of bendamustine as lymphodepletion prior to axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) therapy. METHODS: 84 consecutive patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma treated with axi-cel and managed with a uniform toxicity management plan at Stanford University were studied. 27 patients received alternative lymphodepletion with bendamustine while 57 received FC. RESULTS: Best complete response rates were similar (73.7% for FC and 74% for bendamustine, p=0.28) and there was no significant difference in 12-month progression-free survival or overall survival estimates (p=0.17 and p=0.62, respectively). The frequency of high-grade cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was similar in both the cohorts. Bendamustine cohort experienced lower proportions of hematological toxicities and antibiotic use for neutropenic fever. Immune reconstitution, as measured by quantitative assessment of cellular immunity, was better in bendamustine cohort as compared with FC cohort. CAR T expansion as measured by peak expansion and area under the curve for expansion was comparable between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Bendamustine is a safe and effective alternative lymphodepletion conditioning for axi-cel with lower early hematological toxicity and favorable immune reconstitution.
Asunto(s)
Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Productos Biológicos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Humanos , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Antígenos CD19/inmunología , Antígenos CD19/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a common type of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in adults, accounting for about 20-30% of cases. Although secondary to specific factors, the coexistence of MN and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has been scarcely reported in clinical literature. CASE PRESENTATION: A 59-year-old Chinese male was admitted to the hospital with a generalized pruritic rash with bilateral lower extremity edema, which did not improve significantly after symptomatic treatment. He had undergone renal biopsy, and the diagnosis was thought to be secondary MN (SMN), therefore, we did a lymph node biopsy on the patient and found that MN was complicated with MCL. Soon after, the patient was admitted to the hematology department for a BR chemotherapy regimen (composed of bendamustine 90 mg/m2 BSA (body surface area), rituximab 375 mg/m2 BSA and dexamethasone 5 mg), and during the post-treatment follow-up, both his symptoms and renal function improved. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism underlying the combination of SMN and MCL remains elusive and exceedingly rare, consequently often overlooked in clinical practice. This case serves to offer valuable clinical insights for diagnosis and treatment, while emphasizing the pivotal role of renal pathology in clinical assessment.
Asunto(s)
Exantema , Síndrome Nefrótico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome Nefrótico/complicaciones , Síndrome Nefrótico/diagnóstico , Síndrome Nefrótico/etiología , Síndrome Nefrótico/tratamiento farmacológico , Exantema/etiología , Exantema/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células del Manto/complicaciones , Linfoma de Células del Manto/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células del Manto/diagnóstico , Glomerulonefritis Membranosa/complicaciones , Glomerulonefritis Membranosa/diagnóstico , Glomerulonefritis Membranosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Western countries after diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Most patients with FL present with asymptomatic disease. Survival rates have been rising over time mainly due to advancing therapeutic strategiesA-51-year-old male with a history of well-controlled diabetes mellitus treated with insulin presented to the policlinic of hematology-medical oncology with worsening right inguinal lymphadenopathy for >3 months. He had no complaints of prolonged fever, night sweat, or weight loss. Initial physical examination revealed a healthy male with bulky right inguinal lymphadenopathy. The patient was then referred to a surgeon, and excisional biopsy of the enlarged right inguinal lymph nodes was performed. Therefore, stage II bulky symptomatic low-grade FL was established. We administered chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab and bendamustine every 3 weeks for six cycles. The patient tolerated the treatment well and completed six cycles of chemoimmunotherapy, and the follow-up FDG PET/CT showed complete remission of the disease.The patient achieved complete remission after series of chemoimmunotherapy with Bendamustine-Rituximab. Future assessment is still required for this patient to ensure the remission status of the lymphoma.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Linfoma Folicular , Inducción de Remisión , Rituximab , Humanos , Masculino , Linfoma Folicular/tratamiento farmacológico , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de PositronesRESUMEN
Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) encompasses 70% of cases of marginal zone lymphoma. Frontline bendamustine and rituximab (BR) were derived from trials involving other indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Only one trial has evaluated frontline BR prospectively in EMZL. This retrospective study reports outcomes among EMZL patients receiving frontline BR. Twenty-five patients were included with a median age of 69 years (40-81). Five (20.0%) patients had stage I/II disease, and 20 (80.0%) had stage III/IV disease. The median number of cycles was 6.0 (3.0-6.0). Maintenance rituximab was administered to 10 (41.7%) individuals. Overall response rate (ORR) was 100.0% (60.0% complete response, 40.0% partial response). Medians of overall survival and progression-free survival were not reached. The estimated 2-year progression-free survival was 85.2% and overall survival was 100.0%. Four (16.6%) patients had infections related to treatment; 3 (12.0%) transformed to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; 5 (20.8%) had a relapse or progression of EMZL; and 3 (12.0%) died unrelated to BR. BR is an efficacious and well-tolerated front-line regimen for EMZL with response data consistent with existing literature.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal , Rituximab , Humanos , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/mortalidad , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Supervivencia sin ProgresiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: To date, therapeutic options for T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) remain very limited. This study evaluated the efficacy of monotherapies and combination therapies including a selective BCL-2 inhibitor for T-ALL cell lines, namely Jurkat, CCRF-CEM, and Loucy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Loucy is an early T-precursor ALL (ETP-ALL) cell line characterized by an immature phenotype, whereas Jurkat and CCRF-CEM are late T-cell progenitor ALL (LTP-ALL) cell lines. Monotherapy was conducted with venetoclax, cytarabine, bendamustine, or azacytidine, whereas combination therapy was performed with venetoclax plus cytarabine, venetoclax plus bendamustine, or venetoclax plus azacytidine. Cell viability assay was conducted after 48 h using Trypan blue and the 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS). Statistical analysis for evaluating synergistic interactions between anticancer drugs was performed by using the SynergyFinder Plus and drc R package. RESULTS: Adding venetoclax to cytarabine, bendamustine, or azacitidine achieved an additive effect, with Loewe synergic scores ranging from -10 to 10 in Jurkat and CCRF-CEM. Conversely, the combination of venetoclax and cytarabine displayed an additive effect (Loewe synergic score: 8.45 and 5.82 with MTS and Trypan blue assays, respectively), whereas venetoclax plus bendamustine or azacitidine exhibited a synergistic effect (Loewe synergic score >10 with MTS assay) in Loucy. Remarkably, the Bliss/Loewe score revealed that the combination of venetoclax and bendamustine was the most synergistic, yielding a score of 13.832±0.55. CONCLUSION: The combination of venetoclax and bendamustine demonstrated the greatest synergistic effect in suppressing ETP-ALL cell proliferation. Further studies are warranted to determine the mechanisms for the synergism between venetoclax and bendamustine in high-risk T-ALL.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células T Precursoras , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/farmacología , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/farmacología , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/farmacología , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células T Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células T Precursoras/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Línea Celular Tumoral , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Células Jurkat , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness, safety, and related prognostic factors of the treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL) with a regimen containing Bendamustine. METHODS: The clinical data of 129 FL patients who were treated with Bendamustine containing regimen were collected from January 1,2020 to October 30,2022 in the Hematology Department of Lianyungang Second People's Hospital and Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital. The patients were divided into three groups: Bendamustine plus Rituximab (BR), Bendamustine plus Obinutuzumab (GB), Rituximab + Cyclophosphamide + Epirubicin / Doxorubicin + Vindesine + Prednisone (R-CHOP). The efficacy, safety and related prognostic factors of the treatment of FL with a regimen based on Bendamustine were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The ORR was 98% for the BR group, 94% for the GB group, and 72.3% for the R-CHOP group, while the CR rate was 61.2%,70% and 40.4%, respectively. The ORR and CR rates of the R-CHOP group were statistically different from those of the BR group and GB group (P < 0.05). The 3-year PFS rate of the BR group, GB group, and R-CHOP group was 89.6%, 90.9%, 48.9%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in 3-year PFS between the R-CHOP group, BR group, and GB group (P < 0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference in 3-year OSï¼P ï¼0.05ï¼. Hematological adverse reactions were mainly bone marrow suppression. Lymphocytes and CD4+T lymphocytes decreased to the lowest level about 6 months after treatment, and the incidence of lymphopenia in BR group and GB group was higher than that in R-CHOP group, with a statistical difference (P < 0.05). The higher incidence of non-Hematological adverse reactions were pulmonary infection, EB virus infection, hepatitis B virus reactivation, and gastrointestinal reactions without statistical difference in 3 groups (P >0.05), and were all controllable. The Receiver operating characteristic of CD4+T lymphocyte count showed that AUC of BR group was 0.802, and the critical value was 258/uL; AUC of GB group was 0.754 with a critical value of 322/uL. CONCLUSION: The treatment of FL with the Bendamustine containing regimen has good efficacy and controllable adverse reactions, but lymphocytopenia was significant after treatment, and the curative efficacy in combination with various CD20 monoclonal antibodies was different. The lowest CD4+T lymphocyte count can be used as a predictive factor for the occurrence of infection and efficacy of the Bendamustine containing regimen for FL.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos , Linfoma Folicular , Rituximab , Humanos , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Linfoma Folicular/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Pronóstico , Infecciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , VincristinaRESUMEN
Immune responses to primary COVID-19 vaccination were investigated in 58 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) as part of the PETReA trial of frontline therapy (EudraCT 2016-004010-10). COVID-19 vaccines (BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1) were administered before, during or after cytoreductive treatment comprising rituximab (depletes B cells) and either bendamustine (depletes CD4+ T cells) or cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. Blood samples obtained after vaccine doses 1 and 2 (V1, V2) were analysed for antibodies and T cells reactive to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein using the Abbott Architect and interferon-gamma ELISpot assays respectively. Compared to 149 healthy controls, patients with FL exhibited lower antibody but preserved T-cell responses. Within the FL cohort, multivariable analysis identified low pre-treatment serum IgA levels and V2 administration during induction or maintenance treatment as independent determinants of lower antibody and higher T-cell responses, and bendamustine and high/intermediate FLIPI-2 score as additional determinants of a lower antibody response. Several clinical scenarios were identified where dichotomous immune responses were estimated with >95% confidence based on combinations of predictive variables. In conclusion, the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in FL patients is influenced by multiple disease- and treatment-related factors, among which B-cell depletion showed differential effects on antibody and T-cell responses.
Asunto(s)
Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , COVID-19 , Linfoma Folicular , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Linfoma Folicular/inmunología , Linfoma Folicular/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma Folicular/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Anciano , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Follicular helper T-cell lymphomas (TFHL) harbour frequent alterations in genes that regulate DNA methylation. Preliminary reports suggest that treatment with 5-azacitidine has clinical activity in patients with relapsed or refractory TFHL. We aimed to compare the oral form of azacitidine with investigator's choice standard therapy (ICT; ie, gemcitabine, bendamustine, or romidepsin) in patients with relapsed or refractory TFHL. METHODS: Patients older than 18 years with relapsed or refractory TFHL (angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, or nodal T-cell lymphoma with phenotype, ie, positive with two or more markers among CD10, BCL6, CXCL13, PD1, or ICOS) based on the 2017 WHO classification of haematological neoplasms, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-3, were recruited in university hospitals from five European countries and from Japan. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment with either azacitidine given at a dose of 300 mg once a day (200 mg in Japanese patients) for 14 days in a 28-day cycle or gemcitabine, bendamustine, or romidepsin according to the investigator's choice. Random assignment was stratified by the number of previous lines of therapy and by the presence of previous or concomitant myeloid malignancy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, presented in the intention-to-treat population. This Article is the final analysis of this trial, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Europe NCT03593018 and Japan NCT03703375). FINDINGS: 86 patients (median age 69 years [IQR 62-76], 50 patients were male, 36 were female) were enrolled between Nov 9, 2018, to Feb 22, 2021; 42 in the azacitidine group and 44 in the ICT group. With a median follow-up of 27·4 months (IQR 20·2-32·9), the median progression-free survival was 5·6 months (95% CI 2·7 -8·1) in the azacitidine group versus 2·8 months (1·9-4·8) in the ICT group (hazard ratio of 0·63 (95% CI 0·38-1·07); 1-sided p=0·042). Grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 32 (76%) of 42 patients in the azacitidine group versus 42 (98%) of 43 patients in the ICT group. The most adverse grade 3 or worse adverse events were haematological (28 [67%] of 42 patients vs 40 [93%] of 43 patients), infection (8 [19%] and 14 [33%]), and gastrointestinal (5 [12%] vs 1 [2%] for azacitidine and ICT, respectively). There were two treatment-related deaths in the azacitidine group (one endocarditis and one candidiasis) and three in the ICT group (one heart failure, one COVID-19, and one cause unknown). INTERPRETATION: Although the pre-specified primary outcome of the trial was not met, the favourable safety profile suggests that azacitidine could add to the treatment options in these difficult to treat diseases especially in combination with other drugs. Trials with combination are in preparation in a platform trial. FUNDING: Bristol-Myers Squibb. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Asunto(s)
Azacitidina , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Azacitidina/uso terapéutico , Azacitidina/efectos adversos , Azacitidina/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/efectos adversos , Gemcitabina , Linfoma Folicular/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma Folicular/mortalidad , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/efectos adversos , Depsipéptidos/uso terapéutico , Depsipéptidos/efectos adversos , Depsipéptidos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
Bendamustine has been retrospectively shown to be an effective and safe lymphodepletion regimen prior to the anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART) products tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel, as well as the anti-BCMA CART products idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel. However, bendamustine as lymphodepletion prior to lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), a 4-1BB co-stimulated, fixed CD4:CD8 ratio anti-CD19 CART product, has not been described yet. Thus, we studied a cohort of sequentially-treated patients with large B-cell lymphomas who received bendamustine lymphodepletion before liso-cel at the University of Pennsylvania between 5/2021 and 12/2023 (n = 31). Patients were evaluated for toxicities and responses. Of note, 7 patients (22.6%) would have dnot met the inclusion criteria for the registrational liso-cel clinical trials, mostly due to older age. Overall and complete response rates were 76.9% and 73.1%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 6.3 months, the 6-month progression-free and overall survival were 59.9% and 91.1%, respectively. Rates of cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity (ICANS) of any grade were 9.7% and 9.7%, respectively, with no grade ≥ 3 events. No infections were reported during the first 30 days following liso-cel infusion. Neutropenia ≥ grade 3 was observed in 29.0% of patients; thrombocytopenia ≥ grade 3 occurred in 9.7%. In conclusion, bendamustine lymphodepletion before liso-cel appears to be a strategy that can drive tumor responses while ensuring a mild toxicity profile.
Asunto(s)
Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Humanos , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/efectos adversos , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Extramedullary relapse in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is often associated with loss of biochemical response and the appearance of measurable residual disease in the bone marrow. Fever is an unusual presenting manifestation of MM. Treatment of extramedullary relapse in patients progressing on proteasome inhibitors, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies and immunomodulatory drugs is challenging, as access to chimeric antigen receptor T-cells and bispecific antibodies is limited. We report a case of relapsed MM who presented with fever and hepatic space-occupying lesion mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma. In this case report, we also present our experience of using a novel combination regimen comprising Dara-Pom-Benda-Dexa (daratumumab, pomalidomide, dexamethasone and bendamustine) for relapsed MM.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Hígado/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéuticoAsunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Purinas , Quinazolinonas , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Purinas/administración & dosificación , Purinas/uso terapéutico , Purinas/efectos adversos , Quinazolinonas/administración & dosificación , Quinazolinonas/uso terapéutico , Quinazolinonas/efectos adversos , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
A 61-year-old man present to us with continued abdominal pain without abdominal tenderness for 1 month. Blood testing showed elevated biliary enzymes and inflammation. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed thickening of the transverse colon with relatively strong enhancement but no bile duct dilatation. Colonoscopy revealed localized edema and granular mucosa in the transverse colon. Fluoroscopic endoscopy exhibited the absence of haustra. Multiple biopsies were performed, but differentiation between mild inflammation and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma was inconclusive. To establish a definitive diagnosis, transgastric endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy of the hypoechoic mass was performed. Histopathological analysis exhibited the proliferation of small-sized lymphocytes. Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed the characteristic API2-MALT1 translocation of MALT lymphoma. We performed liver biopsy to investigate biliary enzyme elevation. Histopathology confirmed lymphocytic infiltration within Glisson's capsule. Immunohistochemistry showed positive for CD20 and negative for CD3 and CD5, signifying the infiltration of MALT lymphoma in the liver. Based on these findings, we diagnosed MALT lymphoma, Lugano classification Stage IV. We performed bendamustine-rituximab (BR)-combined therapy. After six courses of BR-combined therapy, colonoscopy revealed improvement in the lead pipe sign and CT revealed disappearance of the mass.
Asunto(s)
Colon Transverso , Neoplasias del Colon , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal , Humanos , Masculino , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/patología , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Colon Transverso/patología , Colon Transverso/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Colonoscopía , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are few reports of clinical practice treatment patterns and efficacy in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied a large, multicenter, cohort of patients with MCL diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 in eight institutions. RESULTS: 536 patients were registered (73% male, median of 70 years). Front-line treatment was based on high-dose cytarabine, bendamustine, and anthracyclines in 42%, 12%, and 15%, respectively. The median PFS for all patients was 45 months; 68, 34, and 30 months for those who received high-dose cytarabine-based, bendamustine-based and anthracycline-based therapy. 204 patients received second-line. Bendamustine-based treatment was the most common second-line regimen (36% of patients). The median second-line PFS (sPFS) for the entire cohort was 14 months; 19, 24, and 31 for bendamustine-, platinum-, and high-dose cytarabine-based regimens, with broad confidence intervals for these latter estimates. Patients treated with cytarabine-based therapies in the front-line and those with front-line PFS longer than 24 months had a substantially superior sPFS. CONCLUSION: Front-line treatment in this cohort of MCL was as expected and with a median PFS of over 3.5 years. Second-line treatment strategies were heterogeneous and the median second-line PFS was little over 1 year.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Linfoma de Células del Manto , Humanos , Linfoma de Células del Manto/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células del Manto/mortalidad , Linfoma de Células del Manto/diagnóstico , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Citarabina/uso terapéutico , Citarabina/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/uso terapéutico , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , RetratamientoRESUMEN
Parsaclisib, a potent and highly selective phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ inhibitor, has shown clinical activity in relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell lymphoma. The phase 1 CITADEL-112 (NCT03424122) study assessed safety and efficacy of parsaclisib in combination with investigator choice standard of care (SOC; rituximab [Treatment A], rituximab plus bendamustine [Treatment B], or ibrutinib [Treatment C]) in 50 patients with R/R B-cell lymphoma. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included neutropenia (62.5%, 50.0%, and 50.0% of patients in Treatments A, B, and C, respectively); diarrhea (37.5%) and anemia (31.3%) in Treatment A; abdominal pain, asthenia, diarrhea, and nausea (each 33.3%) in Treatment B; and increased alanine and aspartate aminotransferase (each 37.5%) in Treatment C. Objective responses were observed in 13 patients (81.3%) in Treatment A, 10 (55.6%) in Treatment B, and 8 (50.0%) in Treatment C. Parsaclisib combined with SOC therapies had an expected safety profile and promising efficacy in patients with R/R B-cell lymphomas.
Asunto(s)
Adenina , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Linfoma de Células B , Piperidinas , Rituximab , Humanos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adenina/administración & dosificación , Linfoma de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B/patología , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Response determined by 18[F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-CT after induction therapy can predict progression-free survival (PFS) in follicular lymphoma (FL). However, little prospective research has examined the significance of PET after second-line therapy. We conducted a prospective multicenter phase II trial (W-JHS NHL01) of bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) without rituximab maintenance for FL in first relapse. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of end-of-treatment (EOT)-PET for predicting PFS in FL patients in first relapse. EOT-PET examinations were performed between 6 and 8 weeks from the start of the last BR cycle. The primary endpoint was 1-year PFS. Key secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), and 1-year overall survival (OS). Seventy-five patients were enrolled, and 8 were excluded from analysis. ORR was 86.6% and CRR was 59.7%. One-year PFS was 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80.7-94.3%) and 1-year OS in 75 patients was 97.3% (95% CI 89.6-99.3%). One-year PFS was significantly inferior in EOT-PET-positive patients (n = 9) compared with PET-negative patients (n = 58) (77.8% vs. 93.1%; p = 0.02). We confirmed that EOT-PET after second-line BR therapy could predict early progression in FL patients in first relapse.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Linfoma Folicular , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Rituximab , Humanos , Linfoma Folicular/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma Folicular/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfoma Folicular/mortalidad , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Japón , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Recurrencia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Radiofármacos/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
The bendamustine-rituximab (BR) schedule is an efficient first-line therapy in Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM). A previous analysis of 69 patients who received this treatment confirmed a high response rate and good progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). With a median follow-up of 76.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 69.9-80.6), 5-year outcome is still excellent at 66.63% (95% CI 56.09-79.17) for PFS and 80.01% (95% CI 70.82-90.41) for OS. The rate of secondary cancers is 17.66% (IQR 7.99-27.64) at 66 months. Relapsed patients who received ibrutinib as second-line clearly benefited from this schedule. This confirms current recommendations suggesting BR long-term efficacy as first-line option in WM.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Rituximab , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström , Humanos , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/uso terapéutico , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/tratamiento farmacológico , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/mortalidad , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Francia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) is an autologous CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for treatment of relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). During a fludarabine shortage, we used bendamustine as an alternative to standard cyclophosphamide/fludarabine (cy/flu) lymphodepletion (LD) prior to brexu-cel. We assessed MCL patient outcomes as well as CAR T-cell expansion and persistence after brexu-cel following bendamustine or cy/flu LD at our center. This was a retrospective single institution study that utilized prospectively banked blood and tissue samples. Clinical efficacy was assessed by 2014 Lugano guidelines. CAR T-cell expansion and persistence in peripheral blood were assessed on day 7 and at ≥month 6 for patients with available samples. Seventeen patients received bendamustine and 5 received cy/flu. For the bendamustine cohort, 14 (82%) received bridging therapy and 4 (24%) had CNS involvement. Fifteen patients (88%) developed CRS with 4 (24%) ≥grade 3 events. Six (35%) patients developed ICANS with 4 (24%) events ≥grade 3. No patient had ≥grade 3 cytopenias at day 90. Best objective (BOR) and complete response (CRR) rates were 82% and 65%, respectively. At 24.5 months median follow-up, 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 45%, 24-month PFS was 25%, and median duration of response was 19 months. Median OS was not reached. BOR was 25% (1/4) for patients with CNS involvement. CAR transgene expansion after bendamustine LD was observed on day 7 in all (4/4) patients tested and persisted at ≥6 months (2/2), regardless of response. Bendamustine LD before brexu-cel for MCL is feasible and safe with a lower frequency and shorter duration of cytopenias than reported for cy/flu. Both CAR T-cell expansion and persistence were observed after bendamustine LD. Outcomes appear comparable to the real world outcomes reported with cy/flu LD.
Asunto(s)
Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Linfoma de Células del Manto , Humanos , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Linfoma de Células del Manto/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Vidarabina/uso terapéutico , Vidarabina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administración & dosificación , Antígenos CD19/inmunología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Infection and lymphopenia are established bendamustine-related complications. The relationship between lymphopenia severity and infection risk, and the role of antimicrobial prophylaxis, is not well described. This multicentre retrospective study analysed infection characteristics and antimicrobial prophylaxis in 302 bendamustine-treated indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Lymphopenia (<1 × 109/L) was near universal and time to lymphocyte recovery correlated with cumulative bendamustine dose. No association between lymphopenia severity and duration with infection was observed. Infections occurred in 44% of patients (50% bacterial) with 27% hospitalised; 32% of infections occurred ≥3 months post bendamustine completion. Infection was associated with obinutuzumab and/or maintenance anti-CD20 therapy, prior therapy and advanced stage. Twenty-four opportunistic infections occurred in 21 patients: ten varicella zoster virus (VZV), seven herpes simplex virus (HSV), one cytomegalovirus, one progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy, one nocardiosis, one Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) and three other fungal infections. VZV/HSV and PJP prophylaxis were prescribed to 42% and 54% respectively. Fewer VZV/HSV infections occurred in patients receiving prophylaxis (HR 0.14, p = 0.061) while PJP prophylaxis was associated with reduced risk of bacterial infection (HR 0.48, p = 0.004). Our study demonstrates a significant infection risk regardless of lymphopenia severity and supports prophylaxis to mitigate the risk of early and delayed infections.