Tibialis spastic varus foot without tarsal coalition: a case report.

Tibialis spastic varus foot (TSVF) is an uncommon clinical entity primarily associated with tarsal coalition. This case report presents a rare instance of TSVF without tarsal coalition in an 8­year-old male patient. Successful treatment was achieved through a conservative approach involving botulinum toxin injections and a plaster cast, highlighting the potential of nonsurgical interventions for this rare condition.

Cuboid-navicular coalition in a female junior athlete.

Tarsal coalition is an uncommon cause of insidious-onset foot pain typically affecting adolescents. Cuboid-navicular coalitions are among the rarest variety, comprising less than 1% of all tarsal coalitions. This case report describes a female competitive gymnast in middle childhood with a 6-month history of worsening insidious onset right foot pain that forced withdrawal from all sporting activities. The patient reported a background of intermittent foot pain and bilateral ankle instability over the past 2 years. A comprehensive history and physical examination, alongside MRI, enabled the diagnosis of a fibro-osseous cuboid-navicular coalition. Through early diagnosis, a targeted and prompt trial of non-operative management was implemented, consisting of physiotherapy, a deloading protocol, orthotics and analgesia. At 6-month follow-up, this led to improvements in pain symptoms and functional outcomes as well as a return to competitive sport. Early recognition of cuboid-navicular coalition is essential to prevent early degenerative joint disease.

Talocalcaneal coalition classifications: A critical analysis review and suggested new classification system with implications for treatment.

Talocalcaneal coalitions (TCC) is the second most frequent tarsal coalition reported. Our aim was to review talocalcaneal coalition classifications and to propose a new classification emphasizing a therapeutic approach. None of the classifications described for TCC mention the presence of flatfoot or valgus hindfoot, which are the key elements when defining the optimal treatment of this disease. We defined five clinical and radiological factors that would guide the choice of surgical treatment and based on these, we proposed a new classification system.

Hindfoot joint kinematics analysis after the resection of talocalcaneal coalition.

BACKGROUND: The subtalar joint movement between the talus and calcaneus is restricted in patients with talocalcaneal coalition (TCC). When the motion of the subtalar joint is restricted, shock absorption in the foot decreases, leading to pain during walking. Resection methods to maintain subtalar motion by removing abnormal unions have been proposed. The purpose of this study was to analyze the joint kinematics of patients who underwent TCC resection and to quantitatively evaluate the results of the surgery based on the measured kinematics. METHODS: Joint kinematics of five patients with TCC were obtained using a biplane fluoroscopic imaging system and an intensity-based two-/three-dimensional registration method. The joint kinematics of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints and the tibiocalcaneal motion during the stance phase of walking were obtained. From the kinematics of the hindfoot joints, the inversion/eversion range of motion (ROM) of the patients before and after resection was statistically analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to test whether TCC resection improved the ROM. RESULTS: During the loading response period, the eversion ROM of the subtalar joint and tibiocalcaneal motion significantly increased postoperatively. In addition, a significant postoperative increase was observed in the subtalar and tibiocalcaneal inversion ROM during the pre-swing period. SIGNIFICANCE: TCC resection surgery increased the ROM of the subtalar joint, which in turn contributed to the increase in tibiocalcaneal ROM. Increased subtalar and tibiocalcaneal ROM could result in increased shock attenuation and may be a contributing factor to pain relief during walking.

Tarsal coalition in adults.

Adult tarsal coalition consists in abnormal union of two or more tarsal bones. Reported incidence ranges between 1 and 13%. It is generally a congenital condition, due to dominant autosomal chromosome disorder, but with some acquired forms following trauma or inflammatory pathology. Poorly specific clinical signs and the difficulty of screening on conventional X-ray may lead to diagnostic failure. The present review of tarsal coalition addresses the following questions: how to define tarsal coalition? How to diagnose it? How to treat it? And what results can be expected? There are 3 types of tarsal coalition, according to the type of tissue between the united bones: bony in pure synostosis, cartilaginous in synchondrosis, and fibrous in syndesmosis. Location varies; the most frequent forms are talocalcaneal (TC) and calcaneonavicular (CN), accounting for more than 90% of cases. Cuneonavicular, intercuneal and cuboideonavicular locations are much rarer, at less than 10%. Tarsal coalition is classically painful, often with valgus spastic flatfoot in young adults. The pain is caused by the biomechanical disturbance induced by the bone, cartilage or fibrous bridges which partially or completely hinder hindfoot and/or midfoot motion. Conventional imaging, with weight-bearing X-ray and CT, is standard practice. Weight-bearing CT is increasingly the gold standard, displaying abnormalities in 3 dimensions. Functional imaging on MRI and tomoscintigraphy assess direct and indirect joint impact at the affected and neighboring joint lines. Non-operative treatment can be proposed, with orthoses, rehabilitation and/or injections. But surgery is the most frequent option: either resection of the bony, cartilaginous or fibrous constructs to restore optimally normal anatomy, or arthrodesis in the affected joint line or the entire joint. Surgery can be open, arthroscopic or percutaneous, depending on the severity of the biomechanical impact on the affected and neighboring joints. Resecting the abnormality is the standard practice in all locations if it affects less than 50% of the talocalcaneal joint line and there is no osteoarthritis to impair the functional outcome. Otherwise, fusion is required. Level of evidence: V; expert opinion.

Outcomes of surgical management for tarsal coalitions: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To analyze the outcome of surgical treatment of tarsal coalition, assess the role of the surgical technique, as well as of coalition size and type on outcomes. METHODS: The search followed the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and was performed in four databases: MEDLINE, Central, Scopus and Web of Science. The protocol has been registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), complications, revisions and radiographic recurrence were collected. Risk of bias was assessed using MINORS criteria. A random-effects model for meta-analysis was applied for analysis of data heterogeneity. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies including 760 tarsal coalitions were included and had a weighted average follow-up of 44 months. Studies scored fair to poor on the risk of bias assessment with a mean MINORS score of 67% (44-81%). In 77.8% (37.5-100%) of surgically treated tarsal coalitions, good/excellent/non-limiting or improved PROMs were reported. Calculated data heterogeneity was moderate (I2 = 57%). Open bar resection with material interposition had a clinical success rate of 78.8% (50-100%). Complications occurred in 4.96% of cases. Coalition size did not prove to be a determining factor in postoperative outcome. The influence of the coalition type was not investigated by any of the studies. CONCLUSION: Data on outcomes of surgical management for tarsal coalitions is limited to retrospective case series with high risk of bias and moderate data heterogeneity. In about ¾ of cases, open resection and interposition of material results in improved PROMs. The arbitrary margin of ≥ 50% of TC coalition size in relation to the posterior facet has little importance in surgical decision-making. None of the studies reported on the influence of the coalition type on postoperative clinical success.

Decision-Making and Management of Tarsal Coalition in the Young Adult Patient: A Critical Analysis Review.

¼ Tarsal coalitions most commonly affect the calcaneonavicular and talocalcaneal joints in up to 13% of the general population. They alter the mechanics of the subtalar joint, limiting inversion and eversion, and place excessive stress on neighboring joints causing pain, recurrent ankle sprains, and/or progressive pes planus during the adolescent growth spurt.¼ While many coalitions are identified on radiographs, advanced imaging with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging is sometimes required. These advanced imaging modalities also serve an essential role for surgical planning to quantify coalition involvement, identify fibrous or cartilaginous coalitions, and aid in determining the degree of deformity within the foot.¼ Surgical treatment is reserved for feet with persistent activity-related pain not relieved by prolonged attempts at nonoperative management, which include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, shoe orthotics, and periods of non-weight-bearing in a cast. These conservative modalities may be successful in up to 85% of cases.¼ For adolescent patients, recent surgical options attempt to avoid arthrodesis and focus on coalition resection and interposition grafting with or without deformity correction. The ultimate decision is based on the location of the pain, the size and histology of the coalition, the health of the posterior subtalar facet, the degree of flatfoot deformity, and the presence of degenerative changes in the subtalar and/or adjacent joints.¼ While many studies focus on subtalar motion and gait kinematics, the critical outcomes remain pain relief and future need for arthrodesis, which may be related not only to resection of the coalition but assessment of deformity, including after the resection has been performed.

Surgical Management and Outcomes of Patients with Idiopathic Peroneal Spastic Flatfoot: A Retrospective Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Although tarsal coalition represents the most common cause of peroneal spastic flatfoot, its existence cannot be verified in several cases. In some patients with rigid flatfoot, no cause can be detected after clinical, laboratory, and radiologic examination, and the condition is called idiopathic peroneal spastic flatfoot (IPSF). This study aimed to present our experience with surgical management and outcomes in patients with IPSF. METHODS: Seven patients with IPSF, who were operated on between 2016 and 2019, and followed for at least 12 months were included, whereas those with known causes, such as tarsal coalition or other causes (eg, traumatic) were excluded. All patients were followed up for 3 months with botulinum toxin injection and cast immobilization as a routine protocol, and clinical improvement was not achieved. The Evans procedure and grafting with tricortical iliac crest bone graft in five patients and subtalar arthrodesis in two patients were performed. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale scores and Foot and Ankle Disability Index scores were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively from all patients. RESULTS: On physical examination, all feet manifested rigid pes planus with varying degrees of hindfoot valgus and limited subtalar motion. Overall, the mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society and Foot and Ankle Disability Index scores significantly increased from 42 (range, 20-76) and 45 (range, 19-68) preoperatively (P = .018) to 85 (range, 67-97) and 84 (range, 67-99) (P = .043) at the final follow-up, respectively. No major intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed in any of the patients. All computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging scans revealed no evidence of tarsal coalitions in any of the feet. All radiologic workups failed to demonstrate secondary signs of fibrous or cartilaginous coalitions. CONCLUSIONS: Operative treatment seems to be a good option in the treatment of patients with IPSF who do not benefit from conservative treatment. In the future, it is recommended to investigate the ideal treatment options for this group of patients.

Fibrin Glue is a Viable Alternative to Fat Graft for Interposition After Tarsal Coalition Resection.

BACKGROUND: Tarsal coalition is one of the most common foot and ankle pathologies in children, yet there is no consensus regarding what to interpose after resection. Fibrin glue could be considered, but the literature comparing fibrin glue to other interposition types is sparse. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of fibrin glue for interposition compared with fat graft by analyzing the rate of coalition recurrence and wound complications. We hypothesized that fibrin glue would have similar rates of coalition recurrence and fewer wound complications compared with fat graft interposition. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed examining all patients who underwent a tarsal coalition resection at a free-standing children's hospital in the United States from 2000 to 2021. Only patients undergoing isolated primary tarsal coalition resection with interposition of fibrin glue or fat graft were included. Wound complications were defined as any concern for an incision site that prompted the use of antibiotics. Comparative analyses were conducted using χ 2 and Fisher exact test to examine relationships among interposition type, coalition recurrence, and wound complications. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two tarsal coalition resections met our inclusion criteria. Fibrin glue was used for interposition in 29 cases and fat graft was used in 93 cases. The difference in the coalition recurrence rate between fibrin glue and fat graft interposition was not statistically significant (6.9% vs. 4.3%, P =0.627). The difference in wound complication rate between fibrin glue and fat graft interposition was not statistically significant (3.4% vs 7.5%, P = 0.679). CONCLUSION: Fibrin glue interposition after tarsal coalition resection is a viable alternative to fat graft interposition. Fibrin glue has similar rates of coalition recurrence and wound complications when compared with fat grafts. Given our results and the lack of tissue harvesting required with fibrin glue, fibrin glue may be superior to fat grafts for interposition after tarsal coalition resection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, a retrospective comparative study between treatment groups.

Review of the role of bone-SPECT/CT in tarsal coalitions.

Tarsal coalition (TC) is a congenital abnormal connection (fibrous, cartilaginous, or osseous) between two or more bones in the hind and midfoot, mostly consisting of calcaneonavicular or talocalcaneal coalition, and is often asymptomatic. However, TCs may result in foot motion limitation and pain with or without flatfoot (pes planus), arising in adolescents and young adults. Appropriate imaging is needed to pinpoint foot pain in the (suspected) TC, starting with plain radiographs. Still, normal radiographs do not exclude TCs. Computed tomography (CT) and MRI are frequently used advanced imaging techniques. CT alone has known limited sensitivity in cartilaginous and fibrous TCs and correlation between CT abnormalities and pain may be challenging, as solely anatomical changes in TCs are often asymptomatic. MRI can depict soft tissue abnormalities in TC with high accuracy. Nonetheless, after the implantation of metallic osteosynthesis material, MRI is often limited due to image distortion, signal loss, and misregistration. Bone scintigraphy with [99mTc]Tc-diphosphonate single photon emission computed tomography/CT (bone-SPECT/CT) is a known sensitive tool to detect osteoblastic bone pathology. However, the literature concerning bone-SPECT/CT in TC patients is limited. This article reviews bone-SPECT/CT patterns in TCs, how it complements other imaging techniques and their relation to clinical complaints. Bone-SPECT/CT excels in accurate bone pathology characterization in TC, confidently excluding synchronous lesions elsewhere, and offering optimal insight into osseous structures and 3D-localization of bone metabolism for surgery planning. Furthermore, even with implanted osteosynthesis material, bone-SPECT/CT can pinpoint the culprit pain generator, where MRI is either contra-indicated or considerably hampered.

A retrospective magnetic resonance imaging analysis of bone and soft tissue changes associated with the spectrum of tarsal coalitions.

We aimed to investigate the bone and soft tissue changes accompanying tarsal coalition (TC) and aimed to evaluate their association with the location and type of coalition. Ankle magnetic resonance imagings of 65 patients with TC were included. The relationship between the location and type of coalition and bone marrow edema, subchondral cysts, sinus tarsi syndrome, tarsal tunnel syndrome, posterior impingement syndrome, accessory bone, tibiotalar effusion, talar osteochondritis dissecans, ganglion cysts, and calcaneal spur were evaluated. Twenty-nine patients without coalition were selected as the control group, and the distribution of these variables between the two groups was analyzed. There were 33 females and 32 males in the coalition group (mean age: 42.0 ± 15.63 years), and 22 females and seven males in the control group (mean age: 44.79 ± 12.33 years). Coalition was most common in the talocalcaneal joint (n = 33, 50.8%), and the most common coalition type was non-osseous (n = 57, 87.6%). We find no significant difference between the pathologies defined in terms of coalition location and type. Sinus tarsi syndrome, tarsal tunnel syndrome, subchondral cysts, and tibiotalar effusion were found to be more common in the coalition group (p = 0.028, p = 0.010, p = 0.023, and p = 0.006, respectively). The presence of coalition increased the probability of developing tarsal tunnel syndrome 9.91 times (95% CI: [1.25-78.59]; p = 0.029), and sinus tarsi syndrome 3.66 times (95% CI: [1.14-11.78]; p = 0.029). Tarsal coalition may predispose bone and soft tissue changes. In this study, sinus tarsi syndrome, tarsal tunnel syndrome, subchondral cysts and tibiotalar effusion were found to be more common in the coalition group.

The Rare Presence of an Asymptomatic Os Sustentaculum in a Young Athlete.

The presence of an os sustentaculum bone is extremely rare. Given the scarcity of clinical literature reporting such a finding, the condition may be misdiagnosed as a fracture of the sustentaculum tali. We describe such an incident in a 16-year-old male athlete presenting for a recent ankle sprain with no other history of trauma or pain on the medial aspect of the ankle. The original computed tomographic scan reported a possible nonunion of a sustentaculum fracture, or peripherally corticated ossification in association with a possible talocalcaneal fibrocartilaginous coalition. Given no history of high-level trauma to the area, the clinical presentation, and the radiographic findings, the more likely diagnosis was confirmed to be an os sustentaculum. The goal of the authors of this article is to report such findings to raise awareness of a rare clinical presentation to avoid misdiagnosis.

Cubonavicular Coalition in a Middle-Aged Woman: A Case Report.

Cubonavicular coalition is a rare type of tarsal coalition that can be described as osseous or nonosseous (fibrous, cartilaginous, or fibrocartilaginous). Typically, it manifests symptoms during adolescence, as it presents with pain at the Mid-hindfoot and with decreased range of motion at the midtarsal joints, hindfoot valgus deformity, or peroneal spasm. Here, we present a rare case of cubonavicular coalition in a middle-aged woman with atypical presentation and a review of the literature. We conclude that this abnormality should be taken into account in the differential diagnosis of mid-hindfoot pain, even in middle-aged adults.

Racial differences in prevalence and anatomical distribution of tarsal coalition.

Previous studies have reported a prevalence of tarsal coalition of 0.03-13%. Calcaneonavicular coalition is known as main anatomical type, and the bilateral occurrence of tarsal coalition is known to be 50% or more. These are the results of studies on Caucasians, there have been few studies targeting large number of East Asians so far. We hypothesized that the prevalence and characteristics of tarsal coalition in East Asians might differ from those in Caucasians. The medical records of 839 patients who underwent bilateral computed tomography on foot and ankle in our hospital from January 2012 to April 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The overall prevalence was 6.0%, talocalcaneal coalition was the most common anatomical type. The overall bilateral occurrence was 56.5%, talocalcaneal coalition had the highest bilateral occurrence (76.0%) among anatomical types. Isolated union of the posterior facet was the most common subtype of talocalcaneal coalition (43.2%). Talocalcaneal coalition had a significantly higher proportion of coalition-related symptomatic patients than calcaneonavicular coalition (p = 0.019). Our study showed a similar trend to other East Asian studies, confirming the existence of racial differences. The possibility of tarsal coalition in foot and ankle patients in East Asians should always be considered, and bilateral examination is essential for diagnosis.

Double and Triple Tarsal Fusions in the Complex Cavovarus Foot.

The cavovarus (cavus) foot is one of the most perplexing and challenging of all foot deformities and may prove to be one of the most difficult conditions to treat. This deformity is characterized by increased plantar flexion of the forefoot and midfoot in relation to the hindfoot resulting in high foot arch. Because cavus foot rarely occurs in an isolated form, the term "cavus foot" rather describes a part of a complex multiplanar foot deformity. Because the underlying disease is mostly neurogenic characterized by muscle imbalance in almost every case a combined bony and soft tissue surgery is inevitable.

Double and Triple Tarsal Fusions in the Severe Rigid Flatfoot Deformity.

A flatfoot deformity is a multiplanar foot deformity characterized by forefoot abduction and supination and hindfoot valgus. With progressive pathology, a rigid deformity may develop. In the setting of a rigid deformity, the appropriate procedure to use is not without controversy. The extent of joints to involve in the arthrodesis depends on the ability to obtain a plantigrade foot. Both double and triple arthrodesis have been suggested. Care must be taken to avoid lateral column shortening and loss of foot reduction when fusing the CC joint. The concerns about lateral skin breakdown led some surgeons to describe a single medial incision for a triple or modified double arthrodesis. The necessity of bone grafting has been controversial. Implant selection is essential to achieve solid stabilization of the arthrodesis sites. To decrease the risk of overcorrection and malunion, the surgeon should be familiar with the hindfoot biomechanics and generate, based on the clinical examination and imaging, a meticulous preoperative plan to address and balance both the soft tissue and bony deformity.

Tarsal coalition resections: a long-term retrospective analysis of 97 resections in 78 patients.

BACKGROUND: Resection of tarsal coalitions provides good patient satisfaction scores, reduced pain, and improved long-term function in both athletic and non-athletic populations. This study aimed to determine when athletic patients undergoing resection of a tarsal coalition were able to return to their desired activity, and whether they experienced a decreased desired activity level (DDA). METHODS: Data on a total of 78 patients who underwent 97 tarsal coalition resections (49 talocalcaneal coalitions, 47 calcaneo-navicular, 14 cuboid-navicular, and three cuneo-navicular; some patients had more than one coalition) operated between January 2001 and June 2020 were prospectively collected. To subjectively assess outcomes, the Roles and Maudsley score (RM) was utilized. RESULTS: At an average follow-up from the index procedure of 33.6 ± 41.5 months, return to activity for the entire cohort was 18.3 ± 9.6 weeks. Post-RM was 1.3 ± 0.6. CONCLUSION: Surgical excision of tarsal coalitions produced favorable results, with most patients able to return to their desired activity level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Talocalcaneal Tarsal Coalition Size: Evaluation and Reproducibility of MRI Measurements.

BACKGROUND: The size of talocalcaneal tarsal coalitions (TCCs) is one of the main factors that is thought to influence patient outcomes after resection. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used to diagnose and characterize TCCs. However, there is no reproducible MRI-based measurement of TCC size reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to create a method to reproducibly measure TCC size using MRI. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with TCCs diagnosed by a hindfoot coronal proton density (PD) MRI between 2017 and 2020 were included. Five independent raters measured coalition width, healthy posterior facet width, and healthy middle facet width on individual slices of coronal PD hindfoot MRIs using discrete MRI measurement guidelines. Individual slice measurements were summed to determine total size of the coalition and the remaining healthy cartilage of the posterior and middle facets. Inter-rater reliability of MRI measurements between the 5 independent examiners was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ICC was calculated for total coalition width, total healthy posterior facet width, total coalition width/total healthy posterior facet width, total coalition width/total healthy middle facet width, total coalition width/total healthy subtalar facet width (posterior facet+middle facet), and total coalition width/total subtalar facet width (coalition+posterior facet+middle facet). RESULTS: The ICC scores for all but one of the MRI measurements indicated good to excellent inter-rater reliability among the 5 examiners. The ICC was 0.932 (95% confidence interval: 0.881-0.966) for measurement of total coalition width/total healthy posterior facet width and 0.948 (95% confidence interval: 0.908-0.973) for measurement of total coalition width/total subtalar facet width (middle+posterior+coalition). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of coalition size using novel MRI guidelines were reproducible with good to excellent inter-rater reliability. These guidelines allow for determination of TCC size using coronal PD MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-diagnostic reproducibility study.