Factors Affecting Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Physician Practices in Ukraine.

PURPOSE: This study aims to identify the factors influencing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening practices, along with the barriers and facilitators from the perspective of primary care physicians (PCPs) in Ukraine. Considering health care system challenges, including those posed by the ongoing war, this research seeks to inform improvements in CRC screening and outcomes in Ukraine and other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: A survey was designed and distributed electronically to Ukrainian PCPs, focusing on CRC screening practices, beliefs, and barriers. The survey incorporated questions adapted from established cancer screening surveys and frameworks. Complete responses were collected from 740 PCPs. Sample statistics were computed, and population-level perceptions and associations with CRC screening practices were estimated by standardizing responses to national PCP demographics. RESULTS: The majority of respondents were women (91%) and specialized in family medicine (84%). Respondents believed in the effectiveness of colonoscopy for reducing CRC mortality (80%), with 75% of PCPs referring patients for this screening modality. Major barriers identified include inadequate training of PCPs in screening and lack of resources. Respondents reported high utilization of fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy for screening when these tests were said to be available in their practices. Self-reported familiarity with CRC screening guidelines and participation in educational workshops were positively associated with screening referrals. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the role of access to CRC screening tests and awareness of screening guidelines in enhancing CRC screening practices among Ukrainian PCPs. Addressing training and resource barriers, alongside public health interventions targeting patient-related barriers, is essential. These findings offer valuable insights for LMICs facing similar challenges, emphasizing the need for tailored strategies to improve cancer screening in these health care settings.

Evolving data on risk and current screening recommendations for colorectal cancer in cystic fibrosis: Pre- and posttransplant.

Advances in treatment for cystic fibrosis (CF), including cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductor regulator (CFTR) modulators, have ushered in an era where patients with CF have much longer life expectancies. This shift in life expectancy demands increased attention to diseases of aging in patients with CF. A notable complication of CF is early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC), which is especially prevalent in patients with severe mutations and after transplant. CFTR acts as a tumor suppressor gene based on knockout models. Lack of CFTR expression promotes carcinogenic processes such as intestinal inflammation and deleterious gut microbiome changes. The consensus Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommendations advocate treating this population as a high-risk group, using a colonoscopy-only screening strategy starting at age 40 in patients without transplant and at age 30 after transplant. Screening should be considered every 5 years if negative and every 3 years or sooner for patients with adenomatous polyps. Future research will determine the role of noninvasive CRC screening tools in this population, as well as the effects of CFTR modulators on the risk of developing CRC.

[Anorectal melanoma: Clinical case]. / Melanoma anorrectal: un caso clínico.

Background: Anorectal melanoma (AM) is a rare and aggressive type of tumor, with varied and inconclusive scientific information. Its preoperative diagnosis is challenging due to its rarity and similarity to other anorectal conditions. It represents only 1.3% of melanomas and affects more women than men. Approximately 20-30% of AM cases are amelanotic, complicating endoscopic detection and leading to misdiagnoses. AM is often confused with hemorrhoids, polyps, and rectal cancer in two thirds of patients due to similar symptoms. The causes and risk factors of AM are not well understood, but they are suspected to differ from cutaneous and ocular melanomas. Diagnosis is performed through biopsy and immunohistochemical staining. Colonoscopy helps to characterize the lesions, and histological examination is crucial for definitive diagnosis. Clinical case: 50-year-old woman with rectal bleeding and proctalgia. AM was diagnosed through colonoscopy, and transanal resection with hemorrhoidectomy was performed. Conclusions: Management of AM is complicated by the lack of randomized trials. Resection surgery is the standard treatment, but there is no established protocol. Wide local excision may be an option for limited cases. Further research is needed to improve the management and treatment of AM. Early detection and complete surgical removal are crucial for enhancing survival in these patients.

Introducción: el melanoma anorrectal (MA) es un tipo raro y agresivo de tumor, cuya información científica es variada y poco concluyente. Su diagnóstico preoperatorio es un desafío debido a su rareza y a su similitud con otras afecciones anorrectales. Representa solo el 1.3% de los melanomas y afecta más a mujeres que a hombres. Aproximadamente el 20-30% de los casos de MA son amelanóticos, lo que complica su detección endoscópica y conduce a diagnósticos erróneos. El MA se confunde con hemorroides, pólipos y cáncer de recto en dos tercios de los pacientes debido a síntomas similares. Las causas y factores de riesgo del MA aún no se conocen bien, pero se sospecha que son diferentes de los melanomas cutáneos y oculares. El diagnóstico se realiza mediante biopsia y tinción inmunohistoquímica. La colonoscopía permite caracterizar las lesiones y el examen histológico es crucial para el diagnóstico definitivo. Caso clínico: mujer de 50 años con rectorragia y proctalgia. Se diagnosticó MA mediante colonoscopía y se realizó una resección transanal con hemorroidectomía. Conclusiones: el manejo del MA es complicado por la falta de ensayos aleatorizados. La cirugía de resección es el tratamiento habitual, pero no hay un protocolo establecido. La escisión local amplia puede ser una opción para casos limitados. Se necesita más investigación para mejorar el manejo y tratamiento del MA. La detección temprana y la extirpación quirúrgica completa son cruciales para mejorar la supervivencia en estos pacientes.

Sit or Squat? Toilet Type Is a Determinant of Diverticulosis Development.

BACKGROUND/AIMS:  Diverticulosis coli is a common disorder of the colon, and a luminal pressure increase in the colon is a proposed mechanism in disease pathogenesis. Toilet types used around the world can be fundamentally categorized into 2 categories: sitting toilets and squatting toilets. Squatting toilets are shown to lead to better puborectalis muscle relaxation, wider anorectal angle, and require less straining compared to sitting toilets. Stemming from this knowledge, we hypothesized that toilet type would play a role in the complex pathogenesis of diverticulosis and that squatting toilets would lower the risk of diverticula formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS:  This study was conducted at Antalya Training and Research Hospital between January 2023 and July 2023. A 1-page questionnaire consisting of demographic data and bowel habits as well as diverticulosis-related parameters was prepared to gather the study data. Colonoscopy results were matched with corresponding questionnaires. RESULTS:  The study population consisted of 929 patients. Advanced age was found to be a risk factor for diverticulosis. Sitting toilet was also found to be a risk factor for diverticulosis in multivariate logistic regression analysis with an odds ratio of 3.36 (95% CI: 1.684-6.705) (P = .001). CONCLUSION:  The results of this study revealed that toilet type is a determining factor in diverticulosis development, as was hypothesized during the conceptualization of the study. Revealing the potential contribution of the toilet type used to the development of a relatively common and impactful disorder like diverticulosis will lay the bedrock for future studies on the topic.

Detection rate of colorectal cancer by routine colonoscopy is comparable in patients aged 45-49 and 50-54 years.

OBJECTIVES: Colorectal carcinoma remains one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Colonoscopy screening is most effective for early detection and tumour prevention and is currently recommended in Europe for adults aged over 50 years. However, given that an increasing proportion of patients are diagnosed before the age of 50, we set out to determine the detection rate of colorectal carcinoma in patients younger than 50 years and to determine the best threshold for starting colonoscopy screening. METHODS: Single-centre, retrospective cohort study of all colonoscopies performed, regardless of indication, in our department at a tertiary Swiss university hospital in patients aged ≥18 and <60 years between 2016 and 2021. Colorectal cancer detection rate was calculated per 5-year age group and analysed separately by sex. RESULTS: The current analysis included 2846 colonoscopies performed for any indication. Colorectal carcinoma was found in 5/366 (1.4%) patients aged 45-49 years (3/210 or 1.4% of males and 2/156 or 1.3% of females) and in 9/819 (1.1%) patients aged 50-54 years (5/495 or 1.0% of males and 4/324 or 1.2% of females). Adenomas with high-grade dysplasia were found in 5/366 (1.4%) patients aged 45-49 years and in 11/819 (1.3%) aged 50-54 years; by sex, in 4/210 or 1.9% of males and 1/156 or 0.6% of females aged 45-49 years, and in 6/495 or 1.2% of males and 5/324 or 1.5% of females aged 50-54 years. Detection of adenoma with low-grade dysplasia increased from 14.6% (21/144) at age <30 years to 41% (150/366) at 45-49 years and 43.5% (356/819) at 50-54 years. A similar increasing trend was also seen if we analysed these groups by sex. CONCLUSIONS: The detection rate of colorectal carcinoma, but also adenomas, in our patients aged 45-49 years was similar to that in patients aged over 50, in both sexes. Thus our data are in line with the assumption that lowering the screening age to 45 years might be reasonable from a medical point of view for achieving a reduction in disease-specific mortality by improved screening strategies.

Barriers and proposed solutions to at-home colorectal cancer screening tests in medically underserved health centers across three US regions to inform a randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: At-home colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is an effective way to reduce CRC mortality, but screening rates in medically underserved groups are low. To plan the implementation of a pragmatic randomized trial comparing two population-based outreach approaches, we conducted qualitative research on current processes and barriers to at-home CRC screening in 10 community health centers (CHCs) that serve medically underserved groups, four each in Massachusetts and California, and two tribal facilities in South Dakota. METHODS: We conducted 53 semi-structured interviews with clinical and administrative staff at the participating CHCs. Participants were asked about CRC screening processes, categorized into eight domains: patient identification, outreach, risk assessment, fecal immunochemical test (FIT) workflows, FIT-DNA (i.e., Cologuard) workflows, referral for a follow-up colonoscopy, patient navigation, and educational materials. Transcripts were analyzed using a Rapid Qualitative Analysis approach. A matrix was used to organize and summarize the data into four sub-themes: current process, barriers, facilitators, and solutions to adapt materials for the intervention. RESULTS: Each site's process for stool-based CRC screening varied slightly. Interviewees identified the importance of offering educational materials in English and Spanish, using text messages to remind patients to return kits, adapting materials to address health literacy needs so patients can access instructions in writing, pictures, or video, creating mailed workflows integrated with a tracking system, and offering patient navigation to colonoscopy for patients with an abnormal result. CONCLUSION: Proposed solutions across the three regions will inform a multilevel intervention in a pragmatic trial to increase CRC screening uptake in CHCs.

Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

Quality indicators during the insertion phase of colonoscopy require exploration. Unsatisfactory insertion experiences cause endoscopist psychophysiological fatigue and affect the quality of their inspection. This comparative study used propensity score matching (PSM) to determine whether endoscopist satisfaction during scope insertion was related to polyp detection rate (PDR). Patients who underwent colonoscopy screening between April 2019 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. The endoscopist satisfaction score (high and low) during the insertion phase in each examination was recorded based on the level of fatigue and presence of paradoxical scope movement. All examinations were classified into 2 groups: a high and a low satisfaction score group. After PSM with potential confounding factors related to polyp detection (endoscopist, insertion and withdrawal time, and sedative agent use), the PDR and adenoma detection rate (ADR) were compared. Overall, 4142 patients (average age, 54.1 years old; 54.4% male) underwent colonoscopies performed by twelve experienced endoscopists. Analysis using a logistic regression model revealed that a high satisfaction score during the insertion phase was an independent predictor of polyp detection (P < .001, odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.41-2.33), whereas insertion time was not. After PSM, 513 patients from both groups were eligible for comparison. Polyp detection rate and ADR were significantly higher in the high-satisfaction group than in the low-satisfaction group (49.5% vs. 36.6%, P < .001; 35.1% vs. 27.1%, P = .007). The endoscopists' level of satisfaction with the insertion phase was shown to be a potential predictor of PDR in screening colonoscopy.

Non-participation of asymptomatic candidates in screening protocols reduces early diagnosis and worsens prognosis of colorectal cancer.

The Agatsuma et al's study shows that despite the evidence of the benefits of an early colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis, through screening in asymptomatic subjects, up to 50% of candidates reject this option and many of those affected are diagnosed later, in advanced stages. The efficacy of screening programs has been well-established for several years, which reduces the risk of CRC morbidity and mortality, without taking into account the test used for screening, or other tools. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients remain unscreened, so understanding the factors involved, as well as the barriers of the population to adherence is the first step to possibly modify the participation rate. These barriers could include a full range of social and political aspects, especially the type of financial provision of each health service. In Japan, health services are universal, and this advantageous situation makes it easier for citizens to access to these services, contributing to the detection of various diseases, including CRC. Interestingly, the symptomatic CRC group had a lower early-stage diagnosis rate than the patients detected during follow-up for other comorbidities, and symptomatic and cancer screening groups showed similar early-stage diagnosis.

Selection of endoscopic resection technique for large colorectal lesion treatment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥ 20 mm (LNPCPs) comprise 1% of all colorectal lesions. LNPCPs are more likely to contain advanced histology such as high-grade dysplasia and submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC). Endoscopic resection is the first-line approach for management of these lesions. Endoscopic resection options include endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), cold-snare EMR (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR). This review aimed to critically evaluate current endoscopic resection techniques. RECENT FINDINGS: Evidence-based selective resection algorithms should inform the most appropriate endoscopic resection technique. Most LNPCPs are removed by conventional EMR but there has been a trend toward C-EMR for endoscopic resection of LNPCPs. More high-quality trials are required to better define the limitations of C-EMR. Advances in our understanding of ESD technique, has clarified its role within the colorectum. More recently, the development of a full thickness resection device (FTRD) has allowed the curative endoscopic resection of select lesions. SUMMARY: Endoscopic resection should be regarded as the principle approach for all LNPCPs. Underpinned by high-quality research, endoscopic resection has become more nuanced, leading to improved patient outcomes.

Income differences in time to colon cancer diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION: People with low income have worse outcomes throughout the cancer care continuum; however, little is known about income and the diagnostic interval. We described diagnostic pathways by neighborhood income and investigated the association between income and the diagnostic interval. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of colon cancer patients diagnosed 2007-2019 in Ontario using routinely collected data. The diagnostic interval was defined as the number of days from the first colon cancer encounter to diagnosis. Asymptomatic pathways were defined as first encounter with a colonoscopy or guaiac fecal occult blood test not occurring in the emergency department and were examined separately from symptomatic pathways. Quantile regression was used to determine the association between neighborhood income quintile and the conditional 50th and 90th percentile diagnostic interval controlling for age, sex, rural residence, and year of diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 64,303 colon cancer patients were included. Patients residing in the lowest income neighborhoods were more likely to be diagnosed through symptomatic pathways and in the emergency department. Living in low-income neighborhoods was associated with longer 50th and 90th-percentile symptomatic diagnostic intervals compared to patients living in the highest income neighborhoods. For example, the 90th percentile diagnostic interval was 15 days (95% CI 6-23) longer in patients living in the lowest income neighborhoods compared to the highest. CONCLUSION: These findings reveal income inequities during the diagnostic phase of colon cancer. Future work should determine pathways to reducing inequalities along the diagnostic interval and evaluate screening and diagnostic assessment programs from an equity perspective.

Oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare oral sulfate solution (OSS) with polyethylene glycol (PEG) for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. METHODS: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane Databases for randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing OSS with PEG for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. The last search was performed on 22 August 2023. The primary outcome was the quality of bowel preparation. The outcomes were compared by meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). RESULTS: A total of 14 RCTs with 4526 patients were included. OSS was comparable with PEG regarding adequate bowel preparation [P = 0.16, odds ratio (OR) = 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.93, 1.51], I2 = 0%]. However, OSS showed obvious priority in excellent bowel preparation (P < 0.001, OR = 1.62, 95% CI [1.27, 2.05], I2 = 0%) and total Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) [P = 0.02, weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.27, 95% CI [0.05, 0.50], I2 = 84%]. Additionally, the detection rate of polyps (P = 0.001, OR = 1.44, 95% CI [1.15, 1.80], I2 = 0%) and adenoma (P = 0.007, OR = 1.22, 95% CI [1.06, 1.42], I2 = 0%) was significantly higher in the OSS group. The two groups showed comparable incidence of adverse events except for a higher incidence of dizziness (P = 0.02, OR = 1.74, 95% CI [1.08, 2.83], I2 = 11%) was indicated in the OSS group. Moreover, OSS was associated with a higher satisfaction score (P = 0.02, WMD = 0.62, 95% CI [0.09, 1.15], I2 = 70%). In the TSA, the cumulative Z-curve crossed both the conventional boundary and trial sequential monitoring boundary and the required information size has been reached for excellent bowel preparation and total BBPS. CONCLUSION: The current data demonstrated that OSS was associated with better quality of bowel preparation. More clinical trials are still needed to confirm other outcomes.

EVALUATION OF QUALITY INDICATORS OF SCREENING COLONOSCOPY PERFORMED IN A PRIVATE QUARTERNARY HOSPITAL IN BRAZIL.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer in Brazil, despite the availability of screening methods that reduce its risk. Colonoscopy is the only screening method that also allows therapeutic procedures. The proper screening through colonoscopy is linked to the quality of the exam, which can be evaluated according to quality criteria recommended by various institutions. Among the factors, the most used is the Adenoma Detection Rate, which should be at least 25% for general population. AIMS: To evaluate the quality of the screening colonoscopies performed in a quarternary private Brazilian hospital. METHODS: This is a retrospective study evaluating the quality indicators of colonoscopies performed at a private center since its inauguration. Only asymptomatic patients aged over 45 years who underwent screening colonoscopy were included. The primary outcome was the Adenoma Detection Rate, and secondary outcomes included polyps detection rate and safety profile. Subanalyses evaluated the correlation of endoscopic findings with gender and age and the evolution of detection rates over the years. RESULTS: A total of 2,144 patients were include with a mean age of 60.54 years-old. Polyps were diagnosed in 68.6% of the procedures. Adenoma detection rate was 46.8%, with an increasing rate over the years, mainly in males. A low rate of adverse events was reported in 0.23% of the cases, with no need for surgical intervention and no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that high quality screening colonoscopy is possible when performed by experienced endoscopists and trained nurses, under an adequate infrastructure.

AI support for colonoscopy quality control using CNN and transformer architectures.

BACKGROUND: Construct deep learning models for colonoscopy quality control using different architectures and explore their decision-making mechanisms. METHODS: A total of 4,189 colonoscopy images were collected from two medical centers, covering different levels of bowel cleanliness, the presence of polyps, and the cecum. Using these data, eight pre-trained models based on CNN and Transformer architectures underwent transfer learning and fine-tuning. The models' performance was evaluated using metrics such as AUC, Precision, and F1 score. Perceptual hash functions were employed to detect image changes, enabling real-time monitoring of colonoscopy withdrawal speed. Model interpretability was analyzed using techniques such as Grad-CAM and SHAP. Finally, the best-performing model was converted to ONNX format and deployed on device terminals. RESULTS: The EfficientNetB2 model outperformed other architectures on the validation set, achieving an accuracy of 0.992. It surpassed models based on other CNN and Transformer architectures. The model's precision, recall, and F1 score were 0.991, 0.989, and 0.990, respectively. On the test set, the EfficientNetB2 model achieved an average AUC of 0.996, with a precision of 0.948 and a recall of 0.952. Interpretability analysis showed the specific image regions the model used for decision-making. The model was converted to ONNX format and deployed on device terminals, achieving an average inference speed of over 60 frames per second. CONCLUSIONS: The AI-assisted quality system, based on the EfficientNetB2 model, integrates four key quality control indicators for colonoscopy. This integration enables medical institutions to comprehensively manage and enhance these indicators using a single model, showcasing promising potential for clinical applications.

Optimization of colorectal cancer screening strategies: New insights.

In this editorial, we discuss the article by Agatsuma et al. We concentrate specifically on the current routinely used screening tests recommended by society guidelines and delve into the significance of early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its substantial impact on both incidence and mortality rates. Screening is highly recommended, and an early diagnosis stands out as the most crucial predictor of survival for CRC patients. Therefore, it is essential to identify and address the barriers hindering adherence to screening measures, as these barriers can vary among different populations. Furthermore, we focus on screening strategy optimization by selecting high-risk groups. Patients with comorbidities who regularly visit hospitals have been diagnosed at an early stage, showing no significant difference compared to patients undergoing regular screening. This finding highlights the importance of extending screening measures to include patients with comorbidities who do not routinely visit the hospital.

Online Educational Module Improves Knowledge of Nurses on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.

The effectiveness of colonoscopy is limited by the adequacy of bowel preparation. Nurses are essential in providing bowel cleansing agents and instructions for hospitalized patients before colonoscopy. This study aims to assess and improve the knowledge of nurses on bowel preparation for inpatient colonoscopy. Participants were asked to complete the survey before and after completing an educational module. The module and survey questions were placed in the NetLearning environment of the hospital intranet. A minimum post-test score of 80% was required to pass the course. A total of 1,107 nurses participated in the survey. Overall, the average score improved from 87% to 93% after the module (p < .0495). Knowledge of the different ways of consuming bowel cleansing agents improved from 54.3% to 83.6% (p = .0001). Only 56.2% of nurses knew how to carry out a split-dose bowel preparation regimen, which increased to 80.1% after the educational module (p = .0001). Nurses' knowledge about the different ways of consuming bowel cleansing agents before colonoscopy and the split-dose regimen is inadequate. A simple online educational module significantly improved the knowledge of nurses on bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

G-EYE Improves Polyp, Adenoma, and Serrated Polyp Detection Rates in Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is the gold-standard test to decrease mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). G-EYE is an inflated balloon on the bending section of the scope with the ability to flatten the folds to improve the adenoma detection rate (ADR). We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of G-EYE in improving ADR and other quality indicators of colonoscopy. METHODS: A literature search was performed through March 21, 2023, on databases including Embase, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science Core Collection, KCI-Korean Journal Index, and Global Index Medicus. Core concepts of G-EYE, colonoscopy, ADR, polyp detection rate (PDR), serrated polyp detection rate (SPDR), and withdrawal time were searched. Statistical analysis was performed with OpenMeta[Analyst]. The odds ratio (OR) for the proportional variable and mean difference for the continuous variable along with 95% CI was used with a P-value <0.05 considered statistically significant. We used the DerSimonian-Laird method and random effects model for pooling data. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded a total of 143 articles. Three studies with 3868 total colonoscopies were finalized. The pooled ADR, PDR, and SPDR showed statistical improvement with G-EYE (OR: 1.744, 95% CI: 1.534-1.984, P<0.001; OR: 1.766, 95% CI: 1.547-2.015, P<0.001; and OR: 1.603, 95% CI: 1.176-2.185, P=0.003). The withdrawal time was also noted to be higher in the G-EYE group (mean difference: 0.114, CI: 0.041-0.186, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that G-EYE can improve ADR, PDR, and SPDR. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of G-EYE on interval CRC and mortality rate.

How COVID-19 Impacted Colonoscopy Utilization and Colorectal Cancer Detection in Hawai'i in 2020.

The Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had a profound impact on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and diagnostic testing. During the initial months of the pandemic, there was a sharp decline in colonoscopies performed as many areas were on lockdown and elective procedures could not be performed. In later months, even when routine procedures started being scheduled again, some patients became fearful of contracting COVID during colonoscopy or lost their health insurance, leading to further delays in CRC diagnosis by colonoscopy. Previous studies have reported the dramatic decrease in colonoscopy rates and CRC detection at various institutions across the country, but no previous study has been performed to determine rates of colorectal screening by colonoscopy in Hawai'i where the demographics of CRC differ. The team investigated the pandemic's impact on colonoscopy services and colorectal neoplasia detection at several large outpatient endoscopy centers in Hawai'i and also classified new CRC cases by patient demographics of age, sex, and ethnicity. There were fewer colonoscopies performed in these endoscopy centers in 2020 than in 2019 and a disproportionate decrease in CRC cases diagnosed. Elderly males as well as Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders were most impacted by this decrease in CRC detection. It is possible there will be an increase in later stage presentation of CRC and eventual CRC related mortality among these patients.

[Colorectal cancer in 45-49-year-olds: systematic or targeted screening?] / Cancer du côlon chez les 45-49 ans : dépistage systématique ou ciblé ?

Principles to guide and inform population-based screening decisions cover a wide range of aspects beyond the screening test. Colorectal cancer (CRC) meets these requirements for individuals at moderate risk aged 50 to 69. In Switzerland, screening using a biennial faecal occult blood test or colonoscopy every 10 years is reimbursed free of deductible in 12 programs covering 15 cantons. This article assesses the appropriateness of systematic screening from age 45 in the Swiss context. Prioritizing measures to raise awareness among healthcare professionals and high-risk subjects rather than lowering the age of eligibility would not only be more sensible but would also benefit to the population over 50 years old.

Les critères pour proposer un dépistage organisé couvrent de nombreuses dimensions, au-delà des caractéristiques du test de dépistage. Le cancer colorectal (CCR) répond à ces exigences pour les personnes à risque modéré de 50 à 69 ans. En Suisse, un dépistage par un test biennal de détection de sang occulte dans les selles ou par coloscopie tous les 10 ans est remboursé hors franchise dans 12 programmes couvrant 15 cantons. Cet article fait le point de la situation concernant l'adéquation d'un dépistage organisé du CCR dès 45 ans dans le contexte suisse. Prioriser des mesures de sensibilisation auprès des professionnel-le-s de santé et des sujets à haut risque de CCR serait non seulement plus judicieux que d'abaisser l'âge d'éligibilité au dépistage organisé mais bénéficierait aussi à la population de plus de 50 ans.