Early cancer screening surveillance in one medical center of China.

Objectives: Cancer screening aims to detect and treat malignant lesions at an early stage and to prolong patients' lifetime. There is still a lack of effective cancer screening programs in China. We initiated a screening project in 2018 and this study presented the cancer screening status in China. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in one cancer-care medical center of China. The screening program included routine blood tests, plasma tumor markers, gastric endoscopy, colonoscopy, ultrasound, and computed tomography (CT) scans. Screening results were presented as sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values (PPVs). Results: Twenty-three (1.46%) out of 1,576 participants were eventually diagnosed with malignant tumors or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN). A family history of malignancy (78.26% in diagnosed cancer and HGIN vs. 46.36% in the others) was the only statistically significant parameter associated with cancer detection (p = 0.002). None of the common tumor markers were associated with the cancers screened. Except for colonoscopy (50.00%) and ultrasound for renal cancer (66.67%), the sensitivities of most screening methods were 100%. The specificities of all the screening means were above 96%. Most PPVs ranged from 30-60%. Conclusion: We emphasized risk stratification for early cancer screening, such as a family history of cancer. The survey illustrated that gastric endoscopy, colonoscopy, ultrasound, and lung CT for early cancer screening had high specificity, reasonable sensitivity, and PPV. We anticipated this report would motivate larger-sample studies to estimate the risk-to-benefit ratio of cancer screening and urge the establishment of a native Chinese screening project and even guidelines.

Adverse events after colonoscopy in a randomised colorectal cancer screening trial.

OBJECTIVE: Colonoscopy-related adverse events increase the burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. This cross-sectional study evaluates adverse events during and after colonoscopy in a large, randomised CRC screening trial in Norway comparing sigmoidoscopy to immunochemical testing for faecal blood. METHODS: We included all individuals who underwent colonoscopy at two screening centres between 2012 and 2020. From medical records, we retrieved data on adverse events during and within 30 days after colonoscopy and classified them according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy lexicon for endoscopic adverse events. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to identify risk factors for adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 10 244 included individuals, 242 (2.4%) had at least one adverse event that was possibly, probably, or definitively related to the colonoscopy. 188 (1.8%) had mild adverse events, 50 (0.49%) had moderate, 3 (0.03%) had severe, and 1 had a fatal adverse event. The most frequent adverse events were lower gastrointestinal bleeding (0.86%), abdominal pain (0.48%), vasovagal reaction (0.39%), postpolypectomy syndrome (0.20%), and perforation (0.08%). 23 (0.22%) individuals had non-gastrointestinal adverse events. Risk factors associated with adverse events were older age, female sex, screening centre, anticoagulant therapy, number of polypectomies, size of lesion removed, presence of proximal lesion, and adenocarcinoma. Adverse event rates per endoscopist ranged from 0% to 4.9%. CONCLUSION: Adverse events after colonoscopy of screening positives occurred in about 2 out of 100 procedures. Three-quarters of events were mild. Awareness of risk factors may help endoscopists to mitigate the risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01538550.

Delayed Cancer Registration and Estimation of Screening Colonoscopy Effects.

This cohort study assesses the magnitude of cancer registration delays and their estimated affects on the NordICC trial results assessing the long-term effects of screening colonoscopy in preventing colorectal cancer.

Delayed diagnosis, disease and secondary prevention, especially in young patients with colorectal cancer.

<b>Introduction:</b> Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and the second cause of death. Its incidence rate decreased by about 3% per year between 2011 and 2015, and mortality by 35% between 1990 and 2007. This improvement is a result of cancer prevention and early detection strategies through screening. The decline in cancer rates may have been due to a growing awareness of colorectal cancer in the Polish population. There was a discernible improvement in the quality of surgical treatment with time.<b>Aim:</b> The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between colonoscopy and the incidence of CRC, the incidence and family history of cancer and other intestinal diseases, as well as between the stage and time from first symptoms to the start of treatment.<b>Materials and methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of the records of patients with CRC treated surgically between 1995 and 2005 at the Department of General, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Surgery in Krakow and a diagnostic survey method were used.<b>Results:</b> There was a statistically significant relationship between the performance of colonoscopy and the incidence of CRC (P<0.001). There was no correlation between CRC and the incidence of cancer and other bowel diseases in the family, or between the stage and the time from first symptoms to the start of treatment. The length of time was long, usually up to 6 months, 1-3 years, and in some cases longer than 6 years.<b>Discussion:</b> Unfortunately, the incidence of CRC in young people under 50 years (EOCRC) has increased. Screening is of proven importance in reducing the incidence and mortality of CRC and every effort should be made to carry out as many of these screenings as possible. The time between diagnosis and treatment should also be kept as short as possible. Recommendations for the timeframe from diagnosis to treatment of cancer exist in many countries. In Australia, guidelines for an optimal care pathway suggest a timeframe of up to 7-9 weeks, similar to the National Health Service UK guidelines in the UK. Timeliness of treatment is an important factor in cancer care, to assess the consequences of delays and disruptions in oncology care.<b>Conclusions:</b> The incidence of CRC was lowest among those who had prophylactic examinations - colonoscopies. Studies on secondary prevention have confirmed that there was poor diagnosis in this area, even though there were cases of CRC in the immediate family, so it is worth educating the public and encouraging them to have colonoscopies and take care of their health. The long time between the appearance of the first clinical symptoms and the start of treatment, which was presented in the study, is unfortunately associated with a worse prognosis, as any delay in starting treatment for oncology patients is unfavorable.<b>Significance of the research for the development of the field:</b> The role of secondary prevention in the prevention of CRC and the need to educate the public to catch the first worrying signs of cancer and to consult a doctor are emphasized.

THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC RESTRICTIVE MEASURES ON THE DIAGNOSIS OF ADENOMATOUS POLYPS AND COLORRECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA IN A POPULATION SUBMITTED TO COLONOSCOPY.

BACKGROUND: •The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis of adenomatous polyps and colorectal cancer. BACKGROUND: •A cross-sectional study evaluating COL performed during the periods from 20 March to 31 October of 2019 and of 2020, which analyzed 10,232 colonoscopies. BACKGROUND: •There was a 51,0% reduction in the number of COL performed in 2020 when compared to 2019. Of the altered exams, adenomatous polyps were diagnosed in 68.8% in 2019 and 78.3% in 2020. CRC was diagnosed in 0.9% in 2019 and 1.6% in 2020. BACKGROUND: •The increase in adenomatous polyps and colorectal cancer diagnoses was observed, it was not enough to compensate for the reduction in the number of exams. BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is globally the third most common malignant neoplasm and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic led to the suspension of routine screening tests by health services. A 35.5% drop in total cancer diagnoses in 2020 is estimated when compared to 2019. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis of adenomatous polyps (AP) and CRC in a population undergoing colonoscopy (COL) in a clinic in Goiânia, Brazil. METHODS: A cross-sectional study evaluating COL performed during the periods from 20 March to 31 October of 2019 and of 2020, was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (CAAE-45631421.0.0000.0037). We analyzed data related to identification, referral for medical examination, colonoscopic and histopathological findings. RESULTS: We evaluated 10,232 (93.4%) COL, divided into two groups according to the year of performance. In 2019, 6,777 (66.2%) COL were performed and in 2020, 3,455 (33.8%), demonstrating a reduction of 51.0%. A total of 3,267 (31.9%) colonoscopies found polyps, 72.1% of which were AP (68.8% in 2019 and 78.3% in 2020, P<0.001). High-grade dysplasia was found in 5.0% of the AP (4.9% in 2019 and 5.8% in 2020, P<0.34). CRC was diagnosed in 121 (1.2%) (0.9% in 2019 and 1.6% in 2020, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly reduced COL in 2020, mainly due to infection fears and restrictions. However, the detection rate of cancer and polyps per procedure increased, indicating more symptomatic patients sought medical attention. Despite this, the absolute number of tumors and adenomas found decreased, potentially causing diagnostic losses and fewer prevented colorectal cancer cases. Thus, adaptive strategies are vital for maintaining essential healthcare services during similar crises.

Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Multicomponent Intervention to Increase Uptake in Patients Aged 45-49.

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended starting at age 45, but there has been little research on strategies to promote screening among patients younger than 50. This study assessed the effect of a multicomponent intervention on screening completion in this age group. METHODS: The intervention consisted of outreach to patients aged 45 to 49 (n = 3,873) via mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) (sent to 46%), text (84%), e-mail (53%), and the extension to this age group of an existing standing order protocol allowing primary care nurses and medical assistants to order FIT at primary care clinics in an urban safety-net system. We used segmented linear regression to assess changes in CRC screening completion trends. Patients aged 51 to 55 were included as a comparison group (n = 3,943). Data were extracted from the EHR. RESULTS: The percentage of patients aged 45 to 49 who were up-to-date with CRC screening (colonoscopy in 10 years or FIT in last year) increased an average of 0.4% (95% CI 0.3, 0.6)) every 30 days before intervention rollout and 2.8% (95% CI 2.5, 3.1) after (slope difference 2.3% [95% CI 2.0, 2.7]). This difference persisted after accounting for small changes in the outcome observed in the comparison group (slope difference 1.7% [95% CI 1.2, 2.2]). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the intervention increased CRC screening completion among patients 45 to 49. Health care systems seeking to improve CRC screening participation among patients aged 45 to 49 should consider implementing similar interventions.

Implementing Faecal Immunochemical Testing in Primary Care.

Aim: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has increased globally, in particular patients under the age of fifty. This is a pilot study of a faecal immunochemical testing(FIT) service in primary care. The aim was to trial a FIT service for asymptomatic patients. Methods: We offered FIT kits to asymptomatic patients, aged between 40-75 years old during routine consultations. The number of FITs performed and the outcomes were reviewed. A cut-off of >10µg Hb/g faeces was defined as a positive result. Results: Overall 180 FIT kits were distributed, 7 duplicate tests were given. Of the 173 patients recruited, 142 (82%) samples were analysed in the lab. A total of 126 ( 88.7%) samples had a normal result, 8(5%) were rejected, 31 (17.9%) did not send their sample for analysis. A positive result was found in 8(5%), of these 6 (75%) underwent colonoscopy. No cancer was identified, 4 (50%) had polyps removed and 2 patients require follow up colonoscopy. Discussion: This study represents the first successful implementation of a FIT service in primary care in Ireland. There is a significant unmet need in this setting and strong scientific rationale for the use of FIT testing in general practice.

The Utility of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening After a Normal Colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) tests (here, Cologuard®) are currently used in average-risk patients as a primary method of screening for colorectal cancer. However, MT-sDNA testing has also been used in patients who previously underwent colonoscopy who wish to avoid repeat colonoscopy. Here, in a large primary care practice setting, our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MT-sDNA testing in patients with a previously normal colonoscopy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 5827 patients from 35 different primary locations in South Carolina. Patients aged 45 and above with a previously documented normal, high-quality colonoscopy prior to the MT-sDNA test date were included. High-risk patients and those with a previous negative MT-sDNA result were excluded. RESULTS: Of 5827 ordered MT-sDNA tests, 248 patients had a prior normal colonoscopy. The average time from initial colonoscopy to MT-sDNA testing was 7.3 years. Of the 63 patients who had a positive MT-sDNA test, 41 patients (65%) completed follow-up colonoscopy and 40 patients had complete colonoscopy data. Of these 40 patients, 12 patients (30%) had advanced adenomas and none had colorectal cancer. Compared to patients without a previous colonoscopy, patients with prior colonoscopies had fewer adenomas of all types (1.6 vs 2.4) and fewer advanced adenomas (1.4 vs 2.0). CONCLUSION: Patients with a previously negative colonoscopy and subsequent positive MT-sDNA test were found to have a high rate of advanced adenomas on follow-up colonoscopy (30%). Thus, in patients with a previously negative colonoscopy, MT-sDNA testing may be a reasonable alternative screening option.

Social Risk Factor Domains and Preventive Care Services in US Adults.

Importance: Growing evidence suggests that social determinants of health are associated with low uptake of preventive care services. Objective: To examine the independent associations of social risk factor domains with preventive care services among US adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used National Health Interview Survey data on 82 432 unweighted individuals (239 055 950 weighted) from 2016 to 2018. Subpopulations were created for each of the primary outcomes: routine mammography (women aged 40-74 years), Papanicolaou test (women aged 21-65 years), colonoscopy (adults aged 45-75 years), influenza vaccine (adults aged ≥18 years), and pneumococcal vaccine (adults aged ≥65 years). Statistical analysis was performed from July to December 2023. Exposures: Six social risk domains (economic instability, lack of community, education deficit, food insecurity, social isolation, and lack of access to care) and a count of domains. Main Outcomes and Measures: Logistic regression models were used to examine the independent association between each primary outcome (mammography, Papanicolaou test, colonoscopy, influenza vaccine, and pneumococcal vaccine) and social risk factor domains, while controlling for covariates (age, sex, race and ethnicity, health insurance, and comorbidities). Results: A total of 82 432 unweighted US individuals (239 055 950 weighted individuals) were analyzed. A total of 54.3% were younger than 50 years, and 51.7% were female. All 5 screening outcomes were associated with educational deficit (mammography: odds ratio [OR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.67-0.80]; Papanicolaou test: OR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.72-0.85]; influenza vaccine: OR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.67-0.74]; pneumococcal vaccine: OR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.63-0.75]; colonoscopy: OR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.77-0.87]) and a lack of access to care (mammography: OR, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.27-0.38]; Papanicolaou test: OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.44-0.54]; influenza vaccine: OR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.41-0.47]; pneumococcal vaccine: OR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.25-0.38]; colonoscopy: OR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.30-0.41]). Fully adjusted models showed that every unit increase in social risk count was significantly associated with decreased odds of receiving a mammography (OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.71-0.77]), Papanicolaou test (OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.81-0.87]), influenza vaccine (OR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.80-0.83]), pneumococcal vaccine (OR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.77-0.83]), and colonoscopy (OR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.86-0.90]). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study of US adults suggests that social risk factor domains were associated with decreased odds of receiving preventive services; this association was cumulative. There is a need to address social risk factors to optimize receipt of recommended preventive services.

Association of late eating with colorectal adenomas: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is linked to lifestyle exposures. However, changes in the CRC rates among younger populations remain poorly understood and suggest the existence of yet unidentified factor(s) that may contribute to colon carcinogenesis. Here, we investigated the potential role of time of eating in the risk of pre-cancerous colonic neoplasms (tubular adenoma: TA). METHODS: We enrolled 663 participants undergoing screening colonoscopies. Data on food timing, dietary intake, sleep/wake patterns, and chronotype were collected through structured questionnaires. Late eating was defined as the consumption of food or snack within a 3-hour window of sleep onset for at least four days a week. Pathology reports confirmed the histology of colonic polyps, and adenomas were further classified into risk categories. RESULTS: A total of 644 patients met criteria for our study. There were 270 (42.2%) participants classified as late eaters. Compared to non-late eaters, the odds of TA were higher in late eaters (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.05-2.03, p = 0.023), an association which was strengthened after adjusting for multiple confounders (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.19-3.28, p = 0.008). Late eating remained an independent risk factor for high-risk as well as multiple TAs. CONCLUSION: This study proposes late eating as a risk factor for colon tubular adenomas and underscores the potential role of less studied forms of circadian disruption imposed by time of eating in the development of colon neoplastic formation.

Trivariate Joint Modeling for Family Data with Longitudinal Counts, Recurrent Events and a Terminal Event with Application to Lynch Syndrome.

Trivariate joint modeling for longitudinal count data, recurrent events, and a terminal event for family data has increased interest in medical studies. For example, families with Lynch syndrome (LS) are at high risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC), where the number of polyps and the frequency of colonoscopy screening visits are highly associated with the risk of CRC among individuals and families. To assess how screening visits influence polyp detection, which in turn influences time to CRC, we propose a clustered trivariate joint model. The proposed model facilitates longitudinal count data that are zero-inflated and over-dispersed and invokes individual-specific and family-specific random effects to account for dependence among individuals and families. We formulate our proposed model as a latent Gaussian model to use the Bayesian estimation approach with the integrated nested Laplace approximation algorithm and evaluate its performance using simulation studies. Our trivariate joint model is applied to a series of 18 families from Newfoundland, with the occurrence of CRC taken as the terminal event, the colonoscopy screening visits as recurrent events, and the number of polyps detected at each visit as zero-inflated count data with overdispersion. We showed that our trivariate model fits better than alternative bivariate models and that the cluster effects should not be ignored when analyzing family data. Finally, the proposed model enables us to quantify heterogeneity across families and individuals in polyp detection and CRC risk, thus helping to identify individuals and families who would benefit from more intensive screening visits.

Pattern of Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening from a Population-Based Screening Program in Iran.

BACKGROUND: In Isfahan, the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been used since January 2016 as part of the Iran's Package of Essential Non-communicable Diseases (IraPEN) program for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The test is recommended for people who are 50-70 years old. Then, those with positive results would be referred for colonoscopy. This study aims to describe the uptake of the program and its outcome. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed by collecting data from Isfahan Vice-Chancellor for Health database for this study purpose. The number of participators, the number of positive FIT, and the number of detected polyps or cancers were determined. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2019, the number of participants in the program reached 345 207 individuals (nearly 40% of the eligible population of 874 674). Totally, 21 264 participants (6.1%) had positive tests, of whom about 20% underwent the recommended colonoscopy with available reports, and 971 (24%) and 110 (3%) patients were diagnosed with polyps and CRC, respectively. CONCLUSION: Over four years of screening with FIT in Isfahan, 40% of the eligible population participated. Among those with positive FIT results, 20% underwent colonoscopy, and approximately 26% of these individuals were identified as having polyps or cancer. This study provides valuable insights into the uptake and outcomes of a population-based CRC screening program in Isfahan, Iran. The findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to increase participation rates and improve the detection of polyps and CRC cases.

The impact of delayed screening colonoscopies during the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening services in Ireland were cancelled or postponed for periods during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of screening colonoscopy delays after a positive FIT on clinical and histopathological outcomes due to these restrictions. METHODS: Participants in the Irish National Bowel Screening Programme with a positive Immunochemical Faecal Test (FIT) during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020-December 2021) were included. Patients were categorised into attended for a colonoscopy <3 months and attended for colonoscopy ≥3-17 months post positive FIT. Chi-Square Test of independence was performed using WinPepi. RESULTS: 3227 individuals had a complete index colonoscopy <3 months and 262 attended colonoscopy from ≥3 to 17 months post positive FIT. Of the clients whose colonoscopy was between ≥3-17 months from positive FIT, the median wait time was 3 months. There was no significant difference found between the two groups for CRC (5.8 % vs 5.0 %, p=0.544) or for the proportion of cancer stage I, stage II and unknown (33.7 %, 40.6 %, 25.7 %, p=0.411). There was no difference in the proportions of adenomas (57.8 % vs 58.4 %, p=0.849) and the proportion of advanced adenomas (7.7 % vs 10.7 %, p=0.077) detected between the two groups. A similar proportion of polyps were detected in individuals whose index colonoscopies were postponed <3 months from positive FIT (66.9 % vs 66 %, p=0.786). CONCLUSION: A median delay of 3 months in screening colonoscopies after a positive FIT does not adversely impact clinical or histopathological outcomes. There was no significant difference in cancer staging, advanced adenomas or polyps detected between those who attended colonoscopies <3 months and ≥3-17 months post positive FIT. COVID-19 related disruptions to the normal functioning of the Irish bowel screening programme did not compromise our key objectives of advanced adenoma and cancer detection.

The repeat FIT (RFIT) study: Does repeating faecal immunochemical tests provide reassurance and improve colorectal cancer detection?

AIM: Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are highly sensitive for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection. Little evidence exists regarding repeat FIT. The repeat FIT (RFIT) study aimed to determine whether second and third FIT provide reassurance and improve CRC or significant bowel disease (SBD) identification. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. Patients recruited from urgent referrals returned three FIT and underwent colonoscopy. Chi-square tests compared categorical data. Diagnostic accuracy variables (sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value [PPV]/negative predictive value [NPV]) were calculated for one, two and three FIT (95% CI). Three negative FIT (<10 µg Hb/g of faeces [µg/g]) groups (one, two, three) were compared with positive groups (one or more FIT ≥10 µg/g). CRC and SBD detection rates were compared by strategy. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients (mean age: 66.8 years, 233 males and 227 females, 23 CRC, 80 SBD) were included in the study. For one, two and three negative FIT, CRC sensitivity remained static (95.7%); specificity (44.6%, 40.7% and 38.4%) and NPV decreased (99.5%, 99.4% and 99.4%). For SBD, sensitivity increased (78.8%, 83.8% and 86.3%), specificity decreased (47.4%, 43.7% and 41.6%) and NPV increased (91.4%, 92.7% and 93.5%). In one, two and three positive FIT groups, CRC detection was 8.3%,16.1% and 20.9%. CRC mean FIT was 150 µg/g, <6 µg/g for benign pathology. CONCLUSIONS: One or more negative FIT increases the sensitivity for CRC/SBD. Repeating FIT provides greater differentiation of patients with and without CRC/SBD compared to single FIT but is associated with decreased specificity and PPV. Multiple negative FIT may offer reassurance; however, application of repeating FIT may be restricted given the associated increase in investigations.

Income differences in time to colon cancer diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION: People with low income have worse outcomes throughout the cancer care continuum; however, little is known about income and the diagnostic interval. We described diagnostic pathways by neighborhood income and investigated the association between income and the diagnostic interval. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of colon cancer patients diagnosed 2007-2019 in Ontario using routinely collected data. The diagnostic interval was defined as the number of days from the first colon cancer encounter to diagnosis. Asymptomatic pathways were defined as first encounter with a colonoscopy or guaiac fecal occult blood test not occurring in the emergency department and were examined separately from symptomatic pathways. Quantile regression was used to determine the association between neighborhood income quintile and the conditional 50th and 90th percentile diagnostic interval controlling for age, sex, rural residence, and year of diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 64,303 colon cancer patients were included. Patients residing in the lowest income neighborhoods were more likely to be diagnosed through symptomatic pathways and in the emergency department. Living in low-income neighborhoods was associated with longer 50th and 90th-percentile symptomatic diagnostic intervals compared to patients living in the highest income neighborhoods. For example, the 90th percentile diagnostic interval was 15 days (95% CI 6-23) longer in patients living in the lowest income neighborhoods compared to the highest. CONCLUSION: These findings reveal income inequities during the diagnostic phase of colon cancer. Future work should determine pathways to reducing inequalities along the diagnostic interval and evaluate screening and diagnostic assessment programs from an equity perspective.

Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

Quality indicators during the insertion phase of colonoscopy require exploration. Unsatisfactory insertion experiences cause endoscopist psychophysiological fatigue and affect the quality of their inspection. This comparative study used propensity score matching (PSM) to determine whether endoscopist satisfaction during scope insertion was related to polyp detection rate (PDR). Patients who underwent colonoscopy screening between April 2019 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. The endoscopist satisfaction score (high and low) during the insertion phase in each examination was recorded based on the level of fatigue and presence of paradoxical scope movement. All examinations were classified into 2 groups: a high and a low satisfaction score group. After PSM with potential confounding factors related to polyp detection (endoscopist, insertion and withdrawal time, and sedative agent use), the PDR and adenoma detection rate (ADR) were compared. Overall, 4142 patients (average age, 54.1 years old; 54.4% male) underwent colonoscopies performed by twelve experienced endoscopists. Analysis using a logistic regression model revealed that a high satisfaction score during the insertion phase was an independent predictor of polyp detection (P < .001, odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.41-2.33), whereas insertion time was not. After PSM, 513 patients from both groups were eligible for comparison. Polyp detection rate and ADR were significantly higher in the high-satisfaction group than in the low-satisfaction group (49.5% vs. 36.6%, P < .001; 35.1% vs. 27.1%, P = .007). The endoscopists' level of satisfaction with the insertion phase was shown to be a potential predictor of PDR in screening colonoscopy.

Effect of different working periods on missed diagnosis of colorectal polyps in colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of different working periods on missed diagnoses in patients with colorectal polyps in colonoscopy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who were diagnosed with colorectal polyps during colonoscopy in an outpatient department between July and December 2022. These patients were subsequently hospitalized for resection during this period. Patients with missed diagnoses were those who had newly discovered polyps in a second colonoscopy. The working periods were categorized as work, near the end of work, and delayed work, respectively, in the morning and afternoon. RESULTS: A total of 482 patients were included, and the miss rate of diagnosis was 48.1% (232/482), mainly in the transverse colon (25%), and the ascending colon (23%). Patient age was a risk factor for the miss rate of diagnosis (OR = 1.025, 95%CI: 1.009-1.042, P = 0.003) and was also associated with the number of polyps detected for the first colonoscopy (χ2 = 18.196, P = 0.001). The different working periods had no statistical effect on the missed rate of diagnosis (χ2 = 1.998, P = 0.849). However, there was an increasing trend in miss rates towards the end of work and delayed work periods, both in the morning and afternoon. The highest miss rate (60.0%) was observed during delayed work in the afternoon. Additionally, poor bowel preparation was significantly more common during delayed work in the afternoon. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing trend in miss rates towards the end of work and delayed work periods deserves clinical attention. Endoscopists cannot always stay in good condition under heavy workloads.

Detection rate of colorectal cancer by routine colonoscopy is comparable in patients aged 45-49 and 50-54 years.

OBJECTIVES: Colorectal carcinoma remains one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Colonoscopy screening is most effective for early detection and tumour prevention and is currently recommended in Europe for adults aged over 50 years. However, given that an increasing proportion of patients are diagnosed before the age of 50, we set out to determine the detection rate of colorectal carcinoma in patients younger than 50 years and to determine the best threshold for starting colonoscopy screening. METHODS: Single-centre, retrospective cohort study of all colonoscopies performed, regardless of indication, in our department at a tertiary Swiss university hospital in patients aged ≥18 and <60 years between 2016 and 2021. Colorectal cancer detection rate was calculated per 5-year age group and analysed separately by sex. RESULTS: The current analysis included 2846 colonoscopies performed for any indication. Colorectal carcinoma was found in 5/366 (1.4%) patients aged 45-49 years (3/210 or 1.4% of males and 2/156 or 1.3% of females) and in 9/819 (1.1%) patients aged 50-54 years (5/495 or 1.0% of males and 4/324 or 1.2% of females). Adenomas with high-grade dysplasia were found in 5/366 (1.4%) patients aged 45-49 years and in 11/819 (1.3%) aged 50-54 years; by sex, in 4/210 or 1.9% of males and 1/156 or 0.6% of females aged 45-49 years, and in 6/495 or 1.2% of males and 5/324 or 1.5% of females aged 50-54 years. Detection of adenoma with low-grade dysplasia increased from 14.6% (21/144) at age <30 years to 41% (150/366) at 45-49 years and 43.5% (356/819) at 50-54 years. A similar increasing trend was also seen if we analysed these groups by sex. CONCLUSIONS: The detection rate of colorectal carcinoma, but also adenomas, in our patients aged 45-49 years was similar to that in patients aged over 50, in both sexes. Thus our data are in line with the assumption that lowering the screening age to 45 years might be reasonable from a medical point of view for achieving a reduction in disease-specific mortality by improved screening strategies.

Non-participation of asymptomatic candidates in screening protocols reduces early diagnosis and worsens prognosis of colorectal cancer.

The Agatsuma et al's study shows that despite the evidence of the benefits of an early colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis, through screening in asymptomatic subjects, up to 50% of candidates reject this option and many of those affected are diagnosed later, in advanced stages. The efficacy of screening programs has been well-established for several years, which reduces the risk of CRC morbidity and mortality, without taking into account the test used for screening, or other tools. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients remain unscreened, so understanding the factors involved, as well as the barriers of the population to adherence is the first step to possibly modify the participation rate. These barriers could include a full range of social and political aspects, especially the type of financial provision of each health service. In Japan, health services are universal, and this advantageous situation makes it easier for citizens to access to these services, contributing to the detection of various diseases, including CRC. Interestingly, the symptomatic CRC group had a lower early-stage diagnosis rate than the patients detected during follow-up for other comorbidities, and symptomatic and cancer screening groups showed similar early-stage diagnosis.

Factors Affecting Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Physician Practices in Ukraine.

PURPOSE: This study aims to identify the factors influencing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening practices, along with the barriers and facilitators from the perspective of primary care physicians (PCPs) in Ukraine. Considering health care system challenges, including those posed by the ongoing war, this research seeks to inform improvements in CRC screening and outcomes in Ukraine and other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: A survey was designed and distributed electronically to Ukrainian PCPs, focusing on CRC screening practices, beliefs, and barriers. The survey incorporated questions adapted from established cancer screening surveys and frameworks. Complete responses were collected from 740 PCPs. Sample statistics were computed, and population-level perceptions and associations with CRC screening practices were estimated by standardizing responses to national PCP demographics. RESULTS: The majority of respondents were women (91%) and specialized in family medicine (84%). Respondents believed in the effectiveness of colonoscopy for reducing CRC mortality (80%), with 75% of PCPs referring patients for this screening modality. Major barriers identified include inadequate training of PCPs in screening and lack of resources. Respondents reported high utilization of fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy for screening when these tests were said to be available in their practices. Self-reported familiarity with CRC screening guidelines and participation in educational workshops were positively associated with screening referrals. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the role of access to CRC screening tests and awareness of screening guidelines in enhancing CRC screening practices among Ukrainian PCPs. Addressing training and resource barriers, alongside public health interventions targeting patient-related barriers, is essential. These findings offer valuable insights for LMICs facing similar challenges, emphasizing the need for tailored strategies to improve cancer screening in these health care settings.