Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 622
Filtrar
1.
Multimedia | MULTIMEDIA | ID: multimedia-10707

RESUMEN

Você já conhece o projeto de Qualificação de CEPs? Venha descobrir, neste episódio, os fundamentos e principais iniciativas deste projeto.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos/normas , Comités de Ética en Investigación , Capacitación de Recursos Humanos en Salud
2.
JAMA ; 328(17): 1747-1765, 2022 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36318128

RESUMEN

Importance: It is uncertain whether hormone therapy should be used for the primary prevention of chronic conditions such as heart disease, osteoporosis, or some types of cancers. Objective: To update evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force on the benefits and harms of hormone therapy in reducing risks for chronic conditions. Data Sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and trial registries from January 1, 2016, through October 12, 2021; surveillance through July 2022. Study Selection: English-language randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort studies of fair or good quality. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Dual review of abstracts, full-text articles, and study quality; meta-analyses when at least 3 similar studies were available. Main Outcomes and Measures: Morbidity and mortality related to chronic conditions; health-related quality of life. Results: Twenty trials (N = 39 145) and 3 cohort studies (N = 1 155 410) were included. Participants using estrogen only compared with placebo had significantly lower risks for diabetes over 7.1 years (1050 vs 903 cases; 134 fewer [95% CI, 18-237]) and fractures over 7.2 years (1024 vs 1413 cases; 388 fewer [95% CI, 277-489]) per 10 000 persons. Risks per 10 000 persons were statistically significantly increased for gallbladder disease over 7.1 years (1113 vs 737 cases; 377 more [95% CI, 234-540]), stroke over 7.2 years (318 vs 239 cases; 79 more [95% CI, 15-159]), venous thromboembolism over 7.2 years (258 vs 181 cases; 77 more [95% CI, 19-153]), and urinary incontinence over 1 year (2331 vs 1446 cases; 885 more [95% CI, 659-1135]). Participants using estrogen plus progestin compared with placebo experienced significantly lower risks, per 10 000 persons, for colorectal cancer over 5.6 years (59 vs 93 cases; 34 fewer [95% CI, 9-51]), diabetes over 5.6 years (403 vs 482 cases; 78 fewer [95% CI, 15-133]), and fractures over 5 years (864 vs 1094 cases; 230 fewer [95% CI, 66-372]). Risks, per 10 000 persons, were significantly increased for invasive breast cancer (242 vs 191 cases; 51 more [95% CI, 6-106]), gallbladder disease (723 vs 463 cases; 260 more [95% CI, 169-364]), stroke (187 vs 135 cases; 52 more [95% CI, 12-104]), and venous thromboembolism (246 vs 126 cases; 120 more [95% CI, 68-185]) over 5.6 years; probable dementia (179 vs 91 cases; 88 more [95% CI, 15-212]) over 4.0 years; and urinary incontinence (1707 vs 1145 cases; 562 more [95% CI, 412-726]) over 1 year. Conclusions and Relevance: Use of hormone therapy in postmenopausal persons for the primary prevention of chronic conditions was associated with some benefits but also with an increased risk of harms.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica , Estrógenos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas , Posmenopausia , Progestinas , Femenino , Humanos , Comités Consultivos/normas , Comités Consultivos/tendencias , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Crónica/prevención & control , Estrógenos/efectos adversos , Estrógenos/uso terapéutico , Fracturas Óseas/prevención & control , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/efectos adversos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/métodos , Hormonas/efectos adversos , Hormonas/uso terapéutico , Prevención Primaria , Progestinas/efectos adversos , Progestinas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos , Incontinencia Urinaria/inducido químicamente , Tromboembolia Venosa/inducido químicamente
4.
Lancet Oncol ; 23(1): e21-e31, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34973228

RESUMEN

High-quality randomised clinical trials testing moderately fractionated breast radiotherapy have clearly shown that local control and survival is at least as effective as with 2 Gy daily fractions with similar or reduced normal tissue toxicity. Fewer treatment visits are welcomed by patients and their families, and reduced fractions produce substantial savings for health-care systems. Implementation of hypofractionation, however, has moved at a slow pace. The oncology community have now reached an inflection point created by new evidence from the FAST-Forward five-fraction randomised trial and catalysed by the need for the global radiation oncology community to unite during the COVID-19 pandemic and rapidly rethink hypofractionation implementation. The aim of this paper is to support equity of access for all patients to receive evidence-based breast external beam radiotherapy and to facilitate the translation of new evidence into routine daily practice. The results from this European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice consensus state that moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy can be offered to any patient for whole breast, chest wall (with or without reconstruction), and nodal volumes. Ultrafractionation (five fractions) can also be offered for non-nodal breast or chest wall (without reconstruction) radiotherapy either as standard of care or within a randomised trial or prospective cohort. The consensus is timely; not only is it a pragmatic framework for radiation oncologists, but it provides a measured proposal for the path forward to influence policy makers and empower patients to ensure equity of access to evidence-based radiotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos/normas , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Selección de Paciente , Oncología por Radiación/normas , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Consenso , Europa (Continente) , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación
5.
Stroke ; 53(1): 61-69, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34607469

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Blinded outcome assessment in trials with prospective randomized open blinded end point design is challenging. Unblinding can result in misclassified outcomes and biased treatment effect estimates. An outcome adjudication committee assures blinded outcome assessment, but the added value for trials with prospective randomized open blinded end point design and subjective outcomes is unknown. We aimed to assess the degree of misclassification of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores by a central assessor and its impact on treatment effect estimates in a stroke trial with prospective randomized open blinded end point design. METHODS: We used data from the MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands). The primary outcome was the mRS at 90 days. Standardized, algorithm-based telephone interviews to assess the mRS were conducted from a central location by an experienced research nurse, unaware but not formally blinded to treatment allocation (central assessor). Masked reports of these interviews were adjudicated by a blinded outcome committee. Misclassification was defined as an incorrect classification of the mRS by the central assessor. The effect of endovascular treatment on the mRS was assessed with multivariable ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: In MR CLEAN, 53/500 (10.6%) of the mRS scores were misclassified. The degree and direction of misclassification did not differ between treatment arms (P=0.59). Benefit of endovascular treatment was shown on the mRS when scored by the central assessor (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.16-2.21]) and the outcome adjudication committee (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.21-2.20]). CONCLUSIONS: Misclassification by the central assessor was small, randomly distributed over treatment arms, and did not affect treatment effect estimates. This study suggests that the added value of a blinded outcome adjudication committee is limited in a stroke trial with prospective randomized open blinded end point design applying standardized, algorithm-based outcome assessment by a central assessor, who is unaware but not formally blinded to treatment allocation. Registration: URL: https://www.isrctn.com; Unique identifier: ISRCTN10888758.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos/normas , Isquemia Encefálica/clasificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/clasificación , Anciano , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Anesth Analg ; 132(6): 1531-1544, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33861047

RESUMEN

Because up to 12% of obstetric patients meet criteria for the diagnosis of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy, it is not infrequent that the anesthesiologist must decide whether to proceed with a neuraxial procedure in an affected patient. Given the potential morbidity associated with general anesthesia for cesarean delivery, thoughtful consideration of which patients with thrombocytopenia are likely to have an increased risk of spinal epidural hematoma with neuraxial procedures, and when these risks outweigh the relative benefits is important to consider and to inform shared decision making with patients. Because there are substantial risks associated with withholding a neuraxial analgesic/anesthetic procedure in obstetric patients, every effort should be made to perform a bleeding history assessment and determine the thrombocytopenia etiology before admission for delivery. Whereas multiple other professional societies (obstetric, interventional pain, and hematologic) have published guidelines addressing platelet thresholds for safe neuraxial procedures, the US anesthesia professional societies have been silent on this topic. Despite a paucity of high-quality data, there are now meta-analyses that provide better estimations of risks. An interdisciplinary taskforce was convened to unite the relevant professional societies, synthesize the data, and provide a practical decision algorithm to help inform risk-benefit discussions and shared decision making with patients. Through a systematic review and modified Delphi process, the taskforce concluded that the best available evidence indicates the risk of spinal epidural hematoma associated with a platelet count ≥70,000 × 106/L is likely to be very low in obstetric patients with thrombocytopenia secondary to gestational thrombocytopenia, immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the absence of other risk factors. Ultimately, the decision of whether to proceed with a neuraxial procedure in an obstetric patient with thrombocytopenia occurs within a clinical context. Potentially relevant factors include, but are not limited to, patient comorbidities, obstetric risk factors, airway examination, available airway equipment, risk of general anesthesia, and patient preference.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Obstétrica/normas , Consenso , Perinatología/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Trombocitopenia/terapia , Comités Consultivos/normas , Anestesia Obstétrica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Perinatología/métodos , Embarazo , Trombocitopenia/diagnóstico
12.
Anesth Analg ; 133(4): 876-890, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33711004

RESUMEN

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), often results in severe hypoxemia requiring airway management. Because SARS-CoV-2 virus is spread via respiratory droplets, bag-mask ventilation, intubation, and extubation may place health care workers (HCW) at risk. While existing recommendations address airway management in patients with COVID-19, no guidance exists specifically for difficult airway management. Some strategies normally recommended for difficult airway management may not be ideal in the setting of COVID-19 infection. To address this issue, the Society for Airway Management (SAM) created a task force to review existing literature and current practice guidelines for difficult airway management by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. The SAM task force created recommendations for the management of known or suspected difficult airway in the setting of known or suspected COVID-19 infection. The goal of the task force was to optimize successful airway management while minimizing exposure risk. Each member conducted a literature review on specific clinical practice section utilizing standard search engines (PubMed, Ovid, Google Scholar). Existing recommendations and evidence for difficult airway management in the COVID-19 context were developed. Each specific recommendation was discussed among task force members and modified until unanimously approved by all task force members. Elements of Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Reporting Checklist for dissemination of clinical practice guidelines were utilized to develop this statement. Airway management in the COVID-19 patient increases HCW exposure risk. Difficult airway management often takes longer and may involve multiple procedures with aerosolization potential, and strict adherence to personal protective equipment (PPE) protocols is mandatory to reduce risk to providers. When a patient's airway risk assessment suggests that awake tracheal intubation is an appropriate choice of technique, and procedures that may cause increased aerosolization of secretions should be avoided. Optimal preoxygenation before induction with a tight seal facemask may be performed to reduce the risk of hypoxemia. Unless the patient is experiencing oxygen desaturation, positive pressure bag-mask ventilation after induction may be avoided to reduce aerosolization. For optimal intubating conditions, patients should be anesthetized with full muscle relaxation. Videolaryngoscopy is recommended as a first-line strategy for airway management. If emergent invasive airway access is indicated, then we recommend a surgical technique such as scalpel-bougie-tube, rather than an aerosolizing generating procedure, such as transtracheal jet ventilation. This statement represents recommendations by the SAM task force for the difficult airway management of adults with COVID-19 with the goal to optimize successful airway management while minimizing the risk of clinician exposure.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Vía Aérea/normas , COVID-19/prevención & control , Personal de Salud/normas , Control de Infecciones/normas , Equipo de Protección Personal/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Adulto , Comités Consultivos/normas , Extubación Traqueal/métodos , Extubación Traqueal/normas , Manejo de la Vía Aérea/métodos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Intubación Intratraqueal/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas
13.
Fertil Steril ; 115(3): 578-582, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33568271

RESUMEN

This document is designed to provide a framework for assisted reproductive technology (ART) programs that meet or exceed the requirements suggested by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for certification of ART laboratories. This document replaces the document "Revised Minimum Standards for Practices Offering Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Committee Opinion" published in 2019.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos/normas , Clínicas de Fertilidad/normas , Personal de Salud/normas , Infertilidad/terapia , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/normas , Nivel de Atención/normas , Humanos , Infertilidad/diagnóstico
15.
Dermatol Surg ; 47(2): 227-234, 2021 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33565776

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As the use of injectable skin fillers increase in popularity, an increase in the reported adverse events is expected. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review supports the development of American Society for Dermatologic Surgery practice guideline on the management of adverse events of skin fillers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Several databases for studies on risk factors or treatments of injection-related visual compromise (IRVC), skin necrosis, inflammatory events, and nodules were searched. Meta-analysis was conducted when feasible. RESULTS: The review included 182 studies. However, IRVC was very rare (1-2/1,000,000 patients) but had poor prognosis with improvement in 19% of cases. Skin necrosis was more common (approximately 5/1,000) with better prognosis (up to 77% of cases showing improvement). Treatments of IRVC and skin necrosis primarily depend on hyaluronidase injections. Risk of skin necrosis, inflammatory events, and nodules may be lower with certain fillers, brands, injection techniques, and volume. Treatment of inflammatory events and nodules with antibiotics, corticosteroids, 5-FU, and hyaluronidase was associated with high response rate (75%-80%). Most of the studies were small and noncomparative, making the evidence certainty very low. CONCLUSION: Practitioners must have adequate knowledge of anatomy, elicit history of skin filler use, and establish preemptive protocols that prepare the clinical practice to manage complications.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Cosméticas/efectos adversos , Rellenos Dérmicos/efectos adversos , Reacción en el Punto de Inyección/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Comités Consultivos/normas , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Rellenos Dérmicos/administración & dosificación , Dermatología/normas , Estética , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Cara/anatomía & histología , Humanos , Reacción en el Punto de Inyección/etiología , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Necrosis/inducido químicamente , Necrosis/terapia , Piel/irrigación sanguínea , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Piel/inervación , Piel/patología , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/normas , Estados Unidos
16.
Lancet Respir Med ; 9(4): 430-434, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33450202

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic strained health-care systems throughout the world. For some, available medical resources could not meet the increased demand and rationing was ultimately required. Hospitals and governments often sought to establish triage committees to assist with allocation decisions. However, for institutions operating under crisis standards of care (during times when standards of care must be substantially lowered in the setting of crisis), relying on these committees for rationing decisions was impractical-circumstances were changing too rapidly, occurring in too many diverse locations within hospitals, and the available information for decision making was notably scarce. Furthermore, a utilitarian approach to decision making based on an analysis of outcomes is problematic due to uncertainty regarding outcomes of different therapeutic options. We propose that triage committees could be involved in providing policies and guidance for clinicians to help ensure equity in the application of rationing under crisis standards of care. An approach guided by egalitarian principles, integrated with utilitarian principles, can support physicians at the bedside when they must ration scarce resources.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Pandemias/prevención & control , Triaje/organización & administración , Comités Consultivos/organización & administración , Comités Consultivos/normas , COVID-19/epidemiología , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Toma de Decisiones en la Organización , Salud Global/economía , Salud Global/normas , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/economía , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/normas , Política de Salud , Humanos , Colaboración Intersectorial , Pandemias/economía , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Nivel de Atención/economía , Triaje/normas
17.
J Med Libr Assoc ; 109(1): 141-153, 2021 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33424477

RESUMEN

The Medical Library Association (MLA) appointed a Diversity and Inclusion Task Force (DITF) in 2017. Sandra G. Franklin, AHIP, FMLA, chaired the task force and guided initiatives. From 2017 to 2020, the task force completed a review of MLA defining documents-including the mission, vision, values, and code of ethics-resulting in language updates to these documents. As MLA transitioned through the communities process, the DITF contributed to the transition. Other recommended essential changes to MLA profiles to promote awareness included updating pronouns to promote gender inclusivity and suggestions for the Annual Meeting Innovation Task Force. DITF members actively brought diversity and inclusion programming and engagement to MLA members at annual meetings. The task force held a fish bowl conversation, an open forum, and a Diversity Dialogues roundtable discussion; provided interactive discussion boards; and designed an MLA diversity button. Beyond MLA annual meetings, the task force hosted two critical librarianship meetings and a Twitter chat to engage MLA members with diversity and inclusion topics. Task force members promoted diversity and inclusion beyond their task force appointments with presentations at chapter meetings and other non-DITF MLA annual meeting programming. A notable task force accomplishment included completing a survey of MLA members to gather baseline demographic characteristics, including never before collected data about disability, socioeconomics, and caregiver status. This report provides an overview of DITF activities from 2017 to 2020.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos/normas , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información/normas , Asociaciones de Bibliotecas/normas , Bibliotecología , Humanos , Bibliotecas Médicas , Estados Unidos
18.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 110(2): 285-288, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33411946

RESUMEN

Patients with multiple chronic conditions, including more advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), are often excluded from clinical trials, creating challenges in deriving appropriate dosing information and labeling. This article summarizes the May 7, 2019, US Food and Drug Administration Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology Advisory Committee Meeting, which solicited expert opinions on how to enroll patients with more advanced CKD into clinical trials as well as the assumptions behind and different approaches of exposure-matching.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos/organización & administración , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/organización & administración , Enfermedades Renales/metabolismo , Farmacología Clínica/organización & administración , United States Food and Drug Administration/organización & administración , Comités Consultivos/normas , Área Bajo la Curva , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/normas , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Semivida , Enfermedades Renales/epidemiología , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples/epidemiología , Farmacología Clínica/normas , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration/normas
19.
Dig Dis Sci ; 66(8): 2578-2584, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32803460

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has caused a backlog of endoscopic procedures; colonoscopy must now be prioritized to those who would benefit most. We determined the proportion of screening and surveillance colonoscopies appropriate for rescheduling to a future year through strict adoption of US Multi-Society Task Force (USMSTF) guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a single-center observational study of patients scheduled for "open-access colonoscopy"-ordered by a primary care provider without being seen in gastroenterology clinic-over a 6-week period during the COVID-19 pandemic. Each chart was reviewed to appropriately assign a surveillance year per USMSTF guidelines including demographics, colonoscopy history and family history. When guidelines recommended a range of colonoscopy intervals, both a "conservative" and "liberal" guideline adherence were assessed. RESULTS: We delayed 769 "open-access" screening or surveillance colonoscopies due to COVID-19. Between 14.8% (conservative) and 20.7% (liberal), colonoscopies were appropriate for rescheduling to a future year. Conversely, 415 (54.0%) patients were overdue for colonoscopy. Family history of CRC was associated with being scheduled too early for both screening (OR 3.9; CI 1.9-8.2) and surveillance colonoscopy (OR 2.6, CI 1.0-6.5). The most common reasons a colonoscopy was inappropriately scheduled this year were failure to use new surveillance colonoscopy intervals (28.9%), incorrectly applied family history guidelines (27.2%) and recommending early surveillance colonoscopy after recent normal colonoscopy (19.3%). CONCLUSION: Up to one-fifth of patients scheduled for "open-access" colonoscopy can be rescheduled into a future year based on USMSTF guidelines. Rigorously applying guidelines could judiciously allocate colonoscopy resources as we recover from the COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Citas y Horarios , COVID-19/epidemiología , Colonoscopía/normas , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/normas , Vigilancia de la Población , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Adulto , Comités Consultivos/normas , Anciano , COVID-19/prevención & control , Pólipos del Colon/diagnóstico , Pólipos del Colon/cirugía , Colonoscopía/métodos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
Can J Diabetes ; 45(3): 228-235.e4, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33046399

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Insulin pump therapy is a valuable, but costly approach, with public funding in Alberta for eligible individuals since 2013. The Provincial Insulin Pump Therapy Program Clinical Advisory Committee has revised and updated the clinical criteria, integrating current literature, best practice and feedback from clinicians. The objective was to develop criteria that would: 1) optimize safety and effectiveness of insulin pump therapy, while 2) carefully stewarding resources available to care for people with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: The Clinical Advisory Committee comprised health-care professionals with expertise in pump therapy and included adult and pediatric endocrinologists, an internist, a pediatrician, certified pump trainers, diabetes educators and clinic managers. The group meets regularly by teleconference. Decisions are made by consensus. RESULTS: Indications for insulin pump therapy for adults and children with insulin-deficient diabetes were divided into 4 hierarchical levels: 1) problematic hypoglycemia, inability to achieve acceptable control or progressive complications; 2) unpredictable activity, dawn phenomenon or children for whom use of multiple daily injections is not appropriate; 3) individual preference and 4) clinical exception, with priority given to indications with clear evidence of benefit. The criteria emphasize the importance of: 1) adequate education in diabetes self-management; 2) adequate trial of flexible insulin therapy with modern analogues and 3) evidence of active, safe diabetes self-management. Tools to facilitate effective and efficient annual review and surveillance were developed incorporating biological, behavioural evaluation and self-reflection to provide a framework for program evaluation. The recommendations were implemented in January 2019. CONCLUSIONS: The process and revised criteria may be valuable for jurisdictions considering how to develop and implement a publicly funded insulin pump program.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos/normas , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Personal de Salud/normas , Sistemas de Infusión de Insulina/normas , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Alberta/epidemiología , Niño , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA