Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 324
Filtrar
1.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1308867, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38832225

RESUMEN

Background: Perinatal depression affects the physical and mental health of pregnant women. It also has a negative effect on children, families, and society, and the incidence is high. We constructed a cost-utility analysis model for perinatal depression screening in China and evaluated the model from the perspective of health economics. Methods: We constructed a Markov model that was consistent with the screening strategy for perinatal depression in China, and two screening strategies (screening and non-screening) were constructed. Each strategy was set as a cycle of 3 months, corresponding to the first trimester, second trimester, third trimester, and postpartum. The state outcome parameters required for the model were obtained based on data from the National Prospective Cohort Study on the Mental Health of Chinese Pregnant Women from August 2015 to October 2016. The cost parameters were obtained from a field investigation on costs and screening effects conducted in maternal and child health care institutions in 2020. The cost-utility ratio and incremental cost-utility ratio of different screening strategies were obtained by multiplicative analysis to evaluate the health economic value of the two screening strategies. Finally, deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted on the uncertain parameters in the model to explore the sensitivity factors that affected the selection of screening strategies. Results: The cost-utility analysis showed that the per capita cost of the screening strategy was 129.54 yuan, 0.85 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) could be obtained, and the average cost per QALY gained was 152.17 yuan. In the non-screening (routine health care) group, the average cost was 171.80 CNY per person, 0.84 QALYs could be obtained, and the average cost per QALY gained was 205.05 CNY. Using one gross domestic product per capita in 2021 as the willingness to pay threshold, the incremental cost-utility ratio of screening versus no screening (routine health care) was about -3,126.77 yuan, which was lower than one gross domestic product per capita. Therefore, the screening strategy was more cost-effective than no screening (routine health care). Sensitivity analysis was performed by adjusting the parameters in the model, and the results were stable and consistent, which did not affect the choice of the optimal strategy. Conclusion: Compared with no screening (routine health care), the recommended perinatal depression screening strategy in China is cost-effective. In the future, it is necessary to continue to standardize screening and explore different screening modalities and tools suitable for specific regions.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Árboles de Decisión , Depresión , Cadenas de Markov , Tamizaje Masivo , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , China , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Adulto , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
2.
J Affect Disord ; 357: 60-67, 2024 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642903

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Women's mental health during the perinatal period is a major public health problem in Pakistan. Many challenges and competing priorities prevent progress to address the large treatment gap. Aim To quantify the long-term impacts of untreated perinatal depression and anxiety in economic terms, thus highlighting its overall burden based on country-specific evidence. METHODS: Cost estimates were generated for a hypothetical cohort of women giving birth in 2017, and their children. Women and children experiencing adverse events linked to perinatal mental health problems were modelled over 40 years. Costs assigned to adverse events included were those linked to losses in quantity and quality-of-life, productivity, and healthcare-related expenditure. Present values were derived using a discount rate of 3 %. Data were taken from published cohort studies, as well as from sources of population, economic and health indicators. RESULTS: The total costs were $16.5 billion for the cohort and $2680 per woman giving birth. The by far largest proportion referred to quality-of-life losses ($15.8 billion). Productivity losses and out-of-pocket expenditure made up only a small proportion of the costs, due to low wages and market prices. When the costs of maternal suicide were included, total costs increased to $16.6 billion. LIMITATIONS: Important evidence gaps prevented the inclusion of all cost consequences linked to perinatal mental health problems. CONCLUSIONS: Total national costs are much higher compared with those in other, higher middle-income countries, reflecting the excessive disease burden. This study is an important first step to inform resource allocations.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Pakistán/epidemiología , Femenino , Embarazo , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Ansiedad/economía , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Depresión/economía , Depresión/epidemiología , Países en Desarrollo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes
3.
BMJ Open ; 14(2): e068941, 2024 Feb 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38417959

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Perinatal mental health problems affect one in five women and cost the UK £8.1 billion for every year of births, with 72% of this cost due to the long-term impact on the child. We conducted a rapid review of health economic evaluations of preventative care for perinatal anxiety and associated disorders. DESIGN: This study adopted a rapid review approach, using principles of the standard systematic review process to generate quality evidence. This methodology features a systematic database search, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses diagram, screening of evidence, data extraction, critical appraisal and narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, PsycINFO and MEDLINE. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Studies that evaluated the costs and cost-effectiveness of preventative care for perinatal anxiety and associated disorders carried out within the National Health Service and similar healthcare systems. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: A minimum of two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen, critically appraise and synthesise included studies. RESULTS: The results indicate a lack of economic evaluation specifically for perinatal anxiety, with most studies focusing on postnatal depression (PND). Interventions to prevent postnatal mental health problems are cost-effective. Modelling studies have also been conducted, which suggest that treating PND with counselling would be cost-effective. CONCLUSION: The costs of not intervening in maternal mental health outweigh the costs of preventative interventions. Preventative measures such as screening and counselling for maternal mental health are shown to be cost-effective interventions to improve outcomes for women and children. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022347859.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Depresión Posparto/prevención & control , Depresión Posparto/economía , Trastornos de Ansiedad/prevención & control , Trastornos de Ansiedad/economía , Reino Unido , Atención Perinatal/economía , Atención Perinatal/métodos
4.
Arch Womens Ment Health ; 27(4): 585-594, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38321244

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To estimate the societal costs of untreated perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs) in Vermont for the 2018-2020 average annual birth cohort from conception through five years postpartum. METHODS: We developed a cost analysis model to calculate the excess cases of outcomes attributed to PMADs in the state of Vermont. Then, we modeled the associated costs of each outcome incurred by birthing parents and their children, projected five years for birthing parents who do not achieve remission by the end of the first year postpartum. RESULTS: We estimated that the total societal cost of untreated PMADs in Vermont could reach $48 million for an annual birth cohort from conception to five years postpartum, amounting to $35,910 in excess societal costs per birthing parent with an untreated PMAD and their child. CONCLUSION: Our model provides evidence of the high costs of untreated PMADs for birthing parents and their children in Vermont. Our estimates for Vermont are slightly higher but comparable to national estimates, which are $35,500 per birthing parent-child pair, adjusted to 2021 US dollars. Investing in perinatal mental health prevention and treatment could improve health outcomes and reduce economic burden of PMADs on individuals, families, employers, and the state.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad , Costo de Enfermedad , Humanos , Vermont , Femenino , Embarazo , Trastornos de Ansiedad/economía , Adulto , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos del Humor/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Atención Perinatal/economía
5.
JAMA ; 328(1): 27-37, 2022 07 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35788794

RESUMEN

Importance: Improving birth outcomes for low-income mothers is a public health priority. Intensive nurse home visiting has been proposed as an intervention to improve these outcomes. Objective: To determine the effect of an intensive nurse home visiting program on a composite outcome of preterm birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age, or perinatal mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a randomized clinical trial that included 5670 Medicaid-eligible, nulliparous pregnant individuals at less than 28 weeks' gestation, enrolled between April 1, 2016, and March 17, 2020, with follow-up through February 2021. Interventions: Participants were randomized 2:1 to Nurse Family Partnership program (n = 3806) or control (n = 1864). The program is an established model of nurse home visiting; regular visits begin prenatally and continue through 2 postnatal years. Nurses provide education, assessments, and goal-setting related to prenatal health, child health and development, and maternal life course. The control group received usual care services and a list of community resources. Neither staff nor participants were blinded to intervention group. Main Outcomes and Measures: There were 3 primary outcomes. This article reports on a composite of adverse birth outcomes: preterm birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age, or perinatal mortality based on vital records, Medicaid claims, and hospital discharge records through February 2021. The other primary outcomes of interbirth intervals of less than 21 months and major injury or concern for abuse or neglect in the child's first 24 months have not yet completed measurement. There were 54 secondary outcomes; those related to maternal and newborn health that have completed measurement included all elements of the composite plus birth weight, gestational length, large for gestational age, extremely preterm, very low birth weight, overnight neonatal intensive care unit admission, severe maternal morbidity, and cesarean delivery. Results: Among 5670 participants enrolled, 4966 (3319 intervention; 1647 control) were analyzed for the primary maternal and neonatal health outcome (median age, 21 years [1.2% non-Hispanic Asian, Indigenous, or Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander; 5.7% Hispanic; 55.2% non-Hispanic Black; 34.8% non-Hispanic White; and 3.0% more than 1 race reported [non-Hispanic]). The incidence of the composite adverse birth outcome was 26.9% in the intervention group and 26.1% in the control group (adjusted between-group difference, 0.5% [95% CI, -2.1% to 3.1%]). Outcomes for the intervention group were not significantly better for any of the maternal and newborn health primary or secondary outcomes in the overall sample or in either of the prespecified subgroups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this South Carolina-based trial of Medicaid-eligible pregnant individuals, assignment to participate in an intensive nurse home visiting program did not significantly reduce the incidence of a composite of adverse birth outcomes. Evaluation of the overall effectiveness of this program is incomplete, pending assessment of early childhood and birth spacing outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03360539.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados de Enfermería en el Hogar , Visita Domiciliaria , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Cuidados de Enfermería en el Hogar/economía , Cuidados de Enfermería en el Hogar/estadística & datos numéricos , Visita Domiciliaria/economía , Visita Domiciliaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Recién Nacido , Medicaid/economía , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Perinatal , Pobreza/economía , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/enfermería , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/prevención & control , South Carolina/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
6.
Nutrients ; 14(2)2022 Jan 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35057472

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Maternal vitamin D deficiency might generate adverse reproductive outcomes, and socio-economic inequalities in micronutrient-related diseases have often been found. This study aimed to explore the interactive effects of maternal vitamin D status and socio-economic status (SES) on risk of spontaneous abortion. METHODS: A population-based case-control study was conducted including 293 women with spontaneous abortion and 498 control women in December 2009 and January, 2010 in Henan Province, China. Information on pregnancy outcomes, maternal demographic, lifestyle and exposure factors and blood samples were collected at the same time. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as 25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL. SES index was constructed with principal component analysis by aggregating women's and their husbands' education level and occupation, and household income and expenditure. Interactive effects were assessed on a multiplicative scale with ratio of the odds ratio (ROR). RESULTS: Compared to those with high SES and vitamin D sufficiency, women with vitamin D deficiency and low SES index had an increased risk of spontaneous abortion (aOR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.23-3.23). The ROR was 2.06 (95% CI: 1.04-4.10), indicating a significant positive multiplicative interaction. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal low SES may strengthen the effect of vitamin D deficiency exposure on spontaneous abortion risk in this Chinese population.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Clase Social , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/epidemiología , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Aborto Espontáneo/economía , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , China/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Estado Nutricional , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/sangre , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Análisis de Componente Principal , Factores de Riesgo , Vitamina D/sangre , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/economía , Adulto Joven
7.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 107(2): 575-585, 2022 01 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34546364

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder of reproductive-aged women, affecting approximately 5% to 20% of women of reproductive age. The economic burden of PCOS was previously estimated at approximately $3.7 billion annually in 2020 USD when considering only the costs of the initial diagnosis and of reproductive endocrine morbidities, without considering the costs of pregnancy-related and long-term morbidities. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the excess prevalence and economic burden of pregnancy-related and long-term health morbidities attributable to PCOS. METHODS: PubMed, EmBase, and Cochrane Library were searched, and studies were selected in which the diagnosis of PCOS was consistent with the Rotterdam, National Institutes of Health, or Androgen Excess and PCOS Society criteria, or that used electronic medical record diagnosis codes, or diagnosis based on histopathologic sampling. Studies that included an outcome of interest and a control group of non-PCOS patients who were matched or controlled for body mass index were included. Two investigators working independently extracted data on study characteristics and outcomes. Data were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. The I2 statistic was used to assess inter-study heterogeneity. The quality of selected studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: The additional total healthcare-related economic burden of PCOS due to pregnancy-related and long-term morbidities in the United States is estimated to be $4.3 billion annually in 2020 USD. CONCLUSION: Together with our prior analysis, the economic burden of PCOS is estimated at $8 billion annually in 2020 USD.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/epidemiología , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/terapia , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Prevalencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(11): e2135161, 2021 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34792591

RESUMEN

Importance: Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) is a major risk factor for maternal mortality, yet little is known about geographic variation in SMM or factors associated with geographical variation at the local level. Municipal governments incur substantial expenditures providing services that are an essential part of residents' lives, but associations between municipal expenditures and SMM have not been previously examined. Objective: To investigate variation in rates of SMM across municipalities in New Jersey, the contributions of individual-level characteristics and municipal expenditures to that variation, and associations between municipal expenditures and SMM. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed 2008 to 2018 New Jersey birth files linked to maternal hospital discharge records and US Census municipal expenditures data. The birth files contain all birth records for New Jersey, and hospital discharge records contain information from all in-patient hospitalizations in New Jersey over the study period. Birth records were matched to maternal discharge records and expenditures data. Data were analyzed from August 2020 to August 2021. Exposures: Individual-level characteristics and per capita municipal expenditures on education; public health; fire and ambulance; parks, recreation, and natural resources; housing and community development; public welfare; police; transportation; and libraries. Main Outcomes and Measures: SMM was identified using diagnosis and procedure codes developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to measure SMM. Results: Of 1 001 410 individuals (mean [SD] age, 29.8 [5.9] years; 108 665 Asian individuals [10.9%]; 147 910 Black individuals [14.8%]; 280 697 Hispanic individuals [28.0%]; 447 442 White individuals [44.7%]) who gave birth in New Jersey hospitals from 2008 to 2018, 19 962 individuals (2.0%) had SMM. There was substantial municipality-level variation in SMM that was not fully explained by demographic characteristics. Municipal expenditures on fire and ambulance, transportation, health, housing, and libraries were negatively associated with SMM; $1000 higher annual expenditures per capita in these categories were associated with 35.4% to 67.3% lower odds of SMM (odds ratios, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.15-0.72] to 0.65 [95% CI, 0.46-0.91]). Expenditures on police were positively associated with SMM (odds ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.04-1.28]). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings in this study regarding associations between spending on various types of services at the municipal level and SMM, holding constant overall spending, population size, and socioeconomic status at the municipal level, indicate that municipal budget allocation decisions were associated with SMM rates and point to the importance of future research investigating potential causal connections.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Materna , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/mortalidad , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Geografía , Humanos , New Jersey/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Gobierno Estatal , Adulto Joven
9.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 26(11): 879-889, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34240784

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess outcomes of delivery hospitalizations, including acute kidney injury (AKI), obstetric and foetal events and resource utilization among pregnant women with kidney transplants compared with pregnant women with no known kidney disease and those with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stages 3-5. METHOD: Hospitalizations for delivery in the US were identified using the enhanced delivery identification method in the National Inpatient Sample dataset from the years 2009 to 2014. Diagnoses of CKD Stages 3-5, kidney transplantation, along with obstetric events, delivery methods and foetal events were identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes. Patients with no known kidney disease group were identified by excluding any diagnoses of CKD, end stage kidney disease, and kidney transplant. Multivariable logistic regression accounting for the survey weights and matched regression was conducted to investigate the risk of maternal and foetal complications in women with kidney transplants, compared with women with no kidney transplants and no known kidney disease, and to women with CKD Stages 3-5. RESULT: A total of 5, 408, 215 hospitalizations resulting in deliveries were identified from 2009 to 2014, including 405 women with CKD Stages 3-5, 295 women with functioning kidney transplants, and 5, 405, 499 women with no known kidney disease. Compared with pregnant women with no known kidney disease, pregnant kidney transplant recipients were at higher odds of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR = 3.11, 95% CI [2.26, 4.28]), preeclampsia/eclampsia/HELLP syndrome (OR = 3.42, 95% CI [2.54, 4.60]), preterm delivery (OR = 2.46, 95% CI [1.75, 3.45]), foetal growth restriction (OR = 1.74, 95% CI [1.01, 3.00]) and AKI (OR = 10.46, 95% CI [5.33, 20.56]). There were no significant differences in rates of gestational diabetes or caesarean section. Pregnant women with kidney transplants had 1.30-times longer lengths of stay and 1.28-times higher costs of hospitalization. However, pregnant women with CKD Stages 3-5 were at higher odds of AKI (OR = 5.29, 95% CI [2.41, 11.59]), preeclampsia/eclampsia/HELLP syndrome (OR = 1.72, 95% CI [1.07, 2.76]) and foetal deaths (OR = 3.20, 95% CI [1.06, 10.24]), and had 1.28-times longer hospital stays and 1.37-times higher costs of hospitalization compared with pregnant women with kidney transplant. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with kidney transplant were more likely to experience adverse events during delivery and had longer lengths of stay and higher total charges when compared with women with no known kidney disease. However, pregnant women with moderate to severe CKD were more likely to experience serious complications than kidney transplant recipients.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Recursos en Salud , Hospitalización , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Bases de Datos Factuales , Parto Obstétrico/economía , Femenino , Recursos en Salud/economía , Precios de Hospital , Costos de Hospital , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Trasplante de Riñón/economía , Tiempo de Internación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Mujeres Embarazadas , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/economía , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Receptores de Trasplantes , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
10.
CMAJ Open ; 9(2): E627-E634, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34088734

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Women with Type 1 Diabetes in Pregnancy Trial (CONCEPTT) found improved health outcomes for mothers and their infants among those randomized to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) compared with SMBG alone. In this study, we evaluated whether CGM or standard SMBG was more or less costly from the perspective of a third-party payer. METHODS: We conducted a posthoc analysis of data from the CONCEPTT trial (Mar. 25, 2013, to Mar. 22, 2016). Health care resource data from 215 pregnant women, randomized to CGM or SMBG, were collected from 31 hospitals in 7 countries. We determined resource costs posthoc based on prices from hospitals in 3 Canadian provinces (Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta). The primary outcome was the difference between groups in the mean total cost of care for mother and infant dyads, paid by each government (i.e., the third-party payer) from randomization to hospital discharge (time horizon). The secondary outcome included CGM and SMBG costs not paid by governments (e.g., glucose monitoring devices and supplies). RESULTS: The mean total cost of care was lower in the CGM group compared with the SMBG group in each province (Ontario: $13 270.25 v. $18 465.21, difference in mean total cost [DMT] -$5194.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] -$9841 to -$1395; BC: $13 480.57 v. $18 762.17, DMT -$5281.60, 95% CI -$9964 to -$1382; Alberta: $13 294.39 v. $18 674.45, DMT -$5380.06, 95% CI -$10 216 to -$1490). There was no difference in the secondary outcome. INTERPRETATION: Government health care costs are lower when CGM is paid by the patient, driven by lower costs from reduced use of the neonatal intensive care unit in the CGM group; however, when governments pay for CGM equipment, there is no overall cost difference between CGM and SMBG. Governments should consider paying for CGM, as it results in improved maternal and neonatal outcomes with no added overall cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT01788527.


Asunto(s)
Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Glucemia/análisis , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Control Glucémico , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Adulto , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea/economía , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea/métodos , Canadá/epidemiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/economía , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Femenino , Macrosomía Fetal/etiología , Macrosomía Fetal/prevención & control , Control Glucémico/economía , Control Glucémico/instrumentación , Control Glucémico/métodos , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/sangre , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología
11.
Value Health ; 24(4): 513-521, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33840429

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fetal growth restriction is a major risk factor for stillbirth. A routine late-pregnancy ultrasound scan could help detect this, allowing intervention to reduce the risk of stillbirth. Such a scan could also detect fetal presentation and predict macrosomia. A trial powered to detect stillbirth differences would be extremely large and expensive. OBJECTIVES: It is therefore critical to know whether this would be a good investment of public research funds. The aim of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of various late-pregnancy screening and management strategies based on current information and predict the return on investment from further research. METHODS: Synthesis of current evidence structured into a decision model reporting expected costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and net benefit over 20 years and value-of-information analysis reporting predicted return on investment from future clinical trials. RESULTS: Given a willingness to pay of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, the most cost-effective strategy is a routine presentation-only scan for all women. Universal ultrasound screening for fetal size is unlikely to be cost-effective. Research exploring the cost implications of induction of labor has the greatest predicted return on investment. A randomized, controlled trial with an endpoint of stillbirth is extremely unlikely to be a value for money investment. CONCLUSION: Given current value-for-money thresholds in the United Kingdom, the most cost-effective strategy is to offer all pregnant women a presentation-only scan in late pregnancy. A randomized, controlled trial of screening and intervention to reduce the risk of stillbirth following universal ultrasound to detect macrosomia or fetal growth restriction is unlikely to represent a value for money investment.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Ultrasonografía/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Método de Montecarlo , Paridad , Embarazo , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/economía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Reino Unido
12.
Obstet Gynecol ; 137(4): 703-712, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33706341

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the cost effectiveness of using behavioral smoking cessation counseling during pregnancy. METHODS: We designed a decision-analytic model using TreeAge Pro 2020 software to compare the cost effectiveness and outcomes among women who received behavioral smoking cessation counseling compared with women who received usual care during pregnancy. We used a theoretical cohort of 285,000 women, the approximate number of pregnant women who smoke each year in the United States. Outcomes included maternal abstinence from smoking, fetal growth restriction, stillbirth, preterm delivery, neonatal death, and cerebral palsy, in addition to cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for both the woman and the neonate. All model inputs were derived from the literature, and a willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $100,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the robustness of baseline assumptions. RESULTS: In our theoretical cohort, behavioral smoking cessation counseling compared with usual care was associated with 9,019 additional women stopping smoking during pregnancy (34,604 vs 25,585). Smoking cessation counseling also resulted in 911 fewer cases of fetal growth restriction, 20 fewer stillbirths, 250 fewer preterm deliveries, 11 fewer neonatal deaths, and one less case of cerebral palsy. Using behavioral smoking cessation counseling interventions during pregnancy led to better outcomes despite higher costs, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $71,658 per QALY, which was below our willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY, making the intervention cost effective. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the counseling intervention was cost effective at probabilities of smoking cessation greater than 11.6% (baseline input: 12.1%) or the cost of the behavioral intervention was less than $475.21 (baseline input: $368.78). CONCLUSION: Behavioral smoking cessation counseling during pregnancy was associated with fewer adverse neonatal outcomes and was cost effective. Increasing utilization of such interventions and increasing insurance coverage of this care are important initiatives to improve outcomes in this at-risk population.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Atención Prenatal , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/economía , Fumar/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
13.
South Med J ; 114(2): 70-72, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33537785

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study is a follow-up to previous research regarding buprenorphine medication-assisted therapy (MAT) in Johnson City, Tennessee. For-profit MAT clinics were surveyed to determine changes in tapering practice patterns and insurance coverage during the last 3 years. METHODS: Johnson City for-profit MAT clinics; also called office based opioid treatment centers, were surveyed by telephone. Clinic representatives were asked questions regarding patient costs for therapy, insurance coverage, counseling offered onsite, and opportunities for tapering while pregnant. RESULTS: All of the MAT clinics representatives indicated that tapering in pregnancy could be considered even though tapering in pregnancy is contrary to current national guidelines. Forty-three percent of the clinics now accept insurance as compared with 0% in the 2016 study. The average weekly cost per visit remained consistent. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of tapering buprenorphine during pregnancy appears to have become a standard of care for this community, as representatives state it is offered at all of the clinics that were contacted. Representatives from three clinics stated the clinics require tapering, even though national organizations such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Society of Addiction Medicine do not recommend this approach. Although patients who have government or other insurance are now able to obtain buprenorphine with no expense at numerous clinics, the high cost for uninsured patients continues to create an environment conducive to buprenorphine diversion.


Asunto(s)
Reducción Gradual de Medicamentos/economía , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/economía , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias/economía , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Analgésicos Opioides/economía , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Región de los Apalaches , Buprenorfina/economía , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Reducción Gradual de Medicamentos/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitales con Fines de Lucro , Humanos , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/métodos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/economía , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Tennessee
14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33143275

RESUMEN

This work analyzed the available evidence in the scientific literature about the risk of preterm birth and/or giving birth to low birth weight newborns in pregnant women with periodontal disease. A systematic search was carried out in three databases for observational cohort studies that related periodontal disease in pregnant women with the risk of preterm delivery and/or low birth weight, and that gave their results in relative risk (RR) values. Eleven articles were found, meeting the inclusion criteria. Statistically significant values were obtained regarding the risk of preterm birth in pregnant women with periodontitis (RR = 1.67 (1.17-2.38), 95% confidence interval (CI)), and low birth weight (RR = 2.53 (1.61-3.98) 95% CI). When a meta-regression was carried out to relate these results to the income level of each country, statistically significant results were also obtained; on the one hand, for preterm birth, a RR = 1.8 (1.43-2.27) 95% CI was obtained and, on the other hand, for low birth weight, RR = 2.9 (1.98-4.26) 95% CI. A statistically significant association of periodontitis, and the two childbirth complications studied was found, when studying the association between these results and the country's per capita income level. However, more studies and clinical trials are needed in this regard to confirm the conclusions obtained.


Asunto(s)
Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Enfermedades Periodontales , Periodontitis , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Renta , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades Periodontales/economía , Enfermedades Periodontales/epidemiología , Periodontitis/economía , Periodontitis/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/economía , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
16.
Obstet Gynecol ; 136(5): 995-1000, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33030870

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess total time for evaluation of women with first-trimester pregnancy concerns in an early pregnancy unit compared with an emergency department (ED) within a single safety net hospital system. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study at Denver Health Medical Center from May 1, 2017, to April 30, 2018. All patients who presented to the early pregnancy unit and a random sample of patients who presented to the ED were identified, stratified by month. Patients were eligible if they were aged 12-55 years, hemodynamically stable, in the first trimester with a positive pregnancy test, and without a prior ultrasonogram. Evaluation time was calculated as difference between registration or check-in and the discharge time. We extracted patient demographics, reproductive histories, presenting symptoms, diagnosis, and management plans at time of discharge from the electronic medical record. Descriptive statistics and multivariate analyses were performed. Lastly, a preliminary analysis of total charges was conducted. RESULTS: Of 250 patients originally identified, 165 met inclusion criteria (79 from the early pregnancy unit and 86 from the ED). There was no statistical difference in race, ethnicity, or insurance type between groups. Median evaluation time was significantly reduced in the early pregnancy unit compared with the ED (45 minutes [interquartile range 31-61] vs 236 minutes [interquartile range 173-307], respectively, P<.001). After adjusting for patient characteristics and clinical presentation, the average total evaluation time among patients in the early pregnancy unit (36 minutes) was 80% lower compared with patients in the ED (180 minutes). Median evaluation charges were significantly less for patients in the early pregnancy unit compared with those in the ED ($586.22 [interquartile range 384.83-757.34] vs $1,350.97 [interquartile range 975.77-3,553.62], respectively, P<.001). CONCLUSION: Time and charges for evaluation of women with first-trimester pregnancy concerns were significantly lower in an early pregnancy unit compared with an ED. Early pregnancy units should be considered as an alternative care model for patients in the first trimester of pregnancy in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/economía , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/economía , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
17.
PLoS One ; 15(8): e0237738, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32817701

RESUMEN

This study assessed within-trial cost-effectiveness of a shared care program (SC, n = 339) for pregnancy outcomes compared to usual care (UC, n = 361), as implemented in a randomized trial of Chinese women with gestational diabetes (GDM). SC consisted of an individualized dietary advice and physical activity counseling program. The UC was a one-time group education program. The effectiveness was measured by number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one macrosomia/large for gestational age (LGA) infant. The cost-effectiveness was measured by incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in terms of cost (2012 Chinese Yuan/US dollar) per case of macrosomia and LGA prevented. The study took both a health care system and a societal perspective. This study found that the NNT was 16/14 for macrosomia/LGA. The incremental cost for treating a pregnant woman was ¥1,877 ($298) from a health care system perspective and ¥2,056 ($327) from a societal perspective. The cost of preventing a case of macrosomia/LGA from the two corresponding perspectives were ¥30,032/¥26,278 ($4,775/$4,178) and ¥32,896/¥28,784 ($5,230/$4,577), respectively. Considering the potential severe adverse health and economic consequences of a macrosomia/LGA infant, our findings suggest that implementing this lifestyle intervention for women with GDM is an efficient use of health care resources.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diabetes Gestacional/economía , Glucosa/metabolismo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Adulto , Peso al Nacer/fisiología , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Diabetes Gestacional/patología , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Femenino , Macrosomía Fetal , Educación en Salud/normas , Estilo de Vida Saludable , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Posmaduro , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/patología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología
18.
Am J Public Health ; 110(6): 888-896, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32298167

RESUMEN

Objectives. To estimate the economic burden of untreated perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs) among 2017 births in the United States.Methods. We developed a mathematical model based on a cost-of-illness approach to estimate the impacts of exposure to untreated PMADs on mothers and children. Our model estimated the costs incurred by mothers and their babies born in 2017, projected from conception through the first 5 years of the birth cohort's lives. We determined model inputs from secondary data sources and a literature review.Results. We estimated PMADs to cost $14 billion for the 2017 birth cohort from conception to 5 years postpartum. The average cost per affected mother-child dyad was about $31 800. Mothers incurred 65% of the costs; children incurred 35%. The largest costs were attributable to reduced economic productivity among affected mothers, more preterm births, and increases in other maternal health expenditures.Conclusions. The US economic burden of PMADs is high. Efforts to lower the prevalence of untreated PMADs could lead to substantial economic savings for employers, insurers, the government, and society.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad , Costo de Enfermedad , Trastornos del Humor , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Trastornos de Ansiedad/complicaciones , Trastornos de Ansiedad/economía , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Trastornos del Humor/complicaciones , Trastornos del Humor/economía , Trastornos del Humor/epidemiología , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo , Estados Unidos
19.
Intellect Dev Disabil ; 58(2): 126-138, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32240049

RESUMEN

Understanding the pregnancy experiences of racial and ethnic minority women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) is critical to ensuring that policies can effectively support these women. This research analyzed data from the 1998-2013 Massachusetts Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal (PELL) data system to examine the racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes and labor and delivery charges of U.S. women with IDD. There was significant preterm birth disparity among non-Hispanic Black women with IDD compared to their non-Hispanic White peers. There were also significant racial and ethnic differences in associated labor and delivery-related charges. Further research, examining potential mechanisms behind the observed racial and ethnic differences in labor and delivery-related charges in Massachusetts' women with IDD is needed.


Asunto(s)
Discapacidades del Desarrollo/epidemiología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Discapacidad Intelectual/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/economía , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Factores Raciales , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
20.
Value Health ; 23(3): 335-342, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32197729

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Studies have shown a consistent impact of socioeconomic status at birth for both mother and child; however, no study has looked at its impact on hospital efficiency and financial balance at birth, which could be major if newborns from disadvantaged families have an average length of stay (LOS) longer than other newborns. Our objective was therefore to study the association between socioeconomic status and hospital efficiency and financial balance in that population. METHODS: A study was carried out using exhaustive national hospital discharge databases. All live births in a maternity hospital located in mainland France between 2012 and 2014 were included. Socioeconomic status was estimated with an ecological indicator and efficiency by variations in patient LOS compared with different mean national LOS. Financial balance was assessed at the admission level through the ratio of production costs and revenues and at the hospital level by the difference in aggregated revenues and production costs for said hospital. Multivariate regression models studied the association between those indicators and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: A total of 2 149 454 births were included. LOS was shorter than the national means for less disadvantaged patients and longer for the more disadvantaged patients, which increased when adjusted for gestational age, birth weight, and severity. A 1% increase in disadvantaged patients in a hospital's case mix significantly increased the probability that the hospital would be in deficit by 2.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Reforms should be made to hospital payment methods to take into account patient socioeconomic status so as to improve resource allocation efficiency.


Asunto(s)
Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/economía , Precios de Hospital , Costos de Hospital , Hospitalización/economía , Maternidades/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Clase Social , Presupuestos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Francia , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Modelos Económicos , Evaluación de Necesidades/economía , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Alta del Paciente/economía , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...