Asunto(s)
Congresos como Asunto , Comunicación por Videoconferencia , Congresos como Asunto/organización & administración , Congresos como Asunto/normas , Congresos como Asunto/tendencias , Investigadores , Viaje , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/organización & administración , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normas , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/provisión & distribución , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Telemedicine can help mitigate important health care challenges, such as demographic changes and the current COVID-19 pandemic, in high-income countries such as Germany. It gives physicians and patients the opportunity to interact via video consultations, regardless of their location, thus offering cost and time savings for both sides. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether telemedicine can be implemented efficiently in the follow-up care for patients in orthopedic and trauma surgery, with respect to patient satisfaction, physician satisfaction, and quality of care. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial in a German university hospital and enrolled 60 patients with different knee and shoulder conditions. For follow-up appointments, patients received either an in-person consultation in the clinic (control group) or a video consultation with their physician (telemedicine group). Patients' and physicians' subsequent evaluations of these follow-up appointments were collected and assessed using separate questionnaires. RESULTS: On the basis of data from 52 consultations after 8 withdrawals, it was found that patients were slightly more satisfied with video consultations (mean 1.58, SD 0.643) than with in-clinic consultations (mean 1.64, SD 0.569), although the difference was not statistically significant (P=.69). After excluding video consultations marred by technical problems, no significant difference was found in physician satisfaction between the groups (mean 1.47, SD 0.516 vs mean 1.32, SD 0.557; P=.31). Further analysis indicated that telemedicine can be applied to broader groups of patients and that patients who have prior experience with telemedicine are more willing to use telemedicine for follow-up care. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine can be an alternative and efficient form of follow-up care for patients in orthopedic and trauma surgery in Germany, and it has no significant disadvantages compared with in-person consultations in the clinic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00023445; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00023445.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , COVID-19 , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/normas , Telemedicina/normas , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Cuidados Posteriores/normas , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Alemania , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Derivación y Consulta/clasificación , Derivación y Consulta/normas , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Telemedicina/métodos , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normasRESUMEN
SUMMARY: The 2020 global pandemic related to the coronavirus has led to unprecedented interruptions in typical patient care and resident education. Teleconferencing software was deployed by many institutions to comply with quarantine and social-distancing regulations. To supplement the loss of clinical experience for trainees, the authors implemented a novel virtual-educational programming using virtual visiting professors and virtual grand rounds. The authors describe the two different formats and advantages such as access to multiple speakers on diverse, innovative topics and decreased financial burdens to the host program. However, the authors do acknowledge some disadvantages from lack of face-to-face social interaction/networking and the need to consider time-zone differences. Both new programs were embraced by trainees at the authors' own institution and residents/medical students across the United States and Canada and around the world. The authors believe teleconferencing should be permanently incorporated into future educational opportunities for plastic surgeons, as it provides easy access to high-quality information.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Rondas de Enseñanza/organización & administración , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/organización & administración , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , Canadá , Docentes , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/economía , Internado y Residencia/normas , Pandemias/prevención & control , Estudiantes de Medicina , Cirujanos , Rondas de Enseñanza/economía , Rondas de Enseñanza/normas , Estados Unidos , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normasAsunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Educación a Distancia , Educación Interprofesional , Pandemias , Relaciones Profesional-Familia , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Educación a Distancia/métodos , Educación a Distancia/organización & administración , Educación Médica/métodos , Educación Médica/organización & administración , Educación en Enfermería/métodos , Educación en Enfermería/organización & administración , Educación en Farmacia/métodos , Educación en Farmacia/organización & administración , Familia , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Educación Interprofesional/métodos , Educación Interprofesional/organización & administración , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/métodos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , SARS-CoV-2 , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Entrenamiento Simulado/organización & administración , Habilidades Sociales , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/organización & administración , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normasAsunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Oncología Médica/métodos , Neoplasias/terapia , Telemedicina/economía , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/inmunología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Renta , Oncología Médica/economía , Oncología Médica/normas , Oncología Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/inmunología , Pandemias/economía , Pandemias/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Telemedicina/normas , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/economía , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normas , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Poblaciones VulnerablesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a widespread adoption of videoconferencing as a communication medium in mental health service delivery. This review considers the empirical literature to date on using videoconferencing to deliver psychological therapy to adults presenting with mental health problems. METHOD: Papers were identified via search of relevant databases. Quantitative and qualitative data were extracted and synthesized on uptake, feasibility, outcomes, and participant and therapist experiences. RESULTS: Videoconferencing has an established evidence base in the delivery of cognitive behavioural therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and depression, with prolonged exposure, cognitive processing therapy, and behavioural activation non-inferior to in-person delivery. There are large trials reporting efficacy for health anxiety and bulimia nervosa compared with treatment-as-usual. Initial studies show applicability of cognitive behavioural therapies for other anxiety and eating disorders and obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, but there has yet to be study of use in severe and complex mental health problems. Therapists may find it more difficult to judge non-verbal behaviour, and there may be initial discomfort while adapting to videoconferencing, but client ratings of the therapeutic alliance are similar to in-person therapy, and videoconferencing may have advantages such as being less confronting. There may be useful opportunities for videoconferencing in embedding therapy delivery within the client's own environment. CONCLUSIONS: Videoconferencing is an accessible and effective modality for therapy delivery. Future research needs to extend beyond testing whether videoconferencing can replicate in-person therapy delivery to consider unique therapeutic affordances of the videoconferencing modality. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Videoconferencing is an efficacious means of delivering behavioural and cognitive therapies to adults with mental health problems. Trial evidence has established it is no less efficacious than in-person therapy for prolonged exposure, cognitive processing therapy, and behavioural activation. While therapists report nonverbal feedback being harder to judge, and clients can take time to adapt to videoconferencing, clients rate the therapeutic alliance and satisfaction similarly to therapy in-person. Videoconferencing provides opportunities to integrate therapeutic exercises within the person's day-to-day environment.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Conductista/normas , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Satisfacción del Paciente , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud , Telemedicina/normas , Alianza Terapéutica , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normas , COVID-19/prevención & control , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has thrust video consulting into the limelight, as health care practitioners worldwide shift to delivering care remotely. Evidence suggests that video consulting is acceptable, safe, and effective in selected conditions and settings. However, research to date has mostly focused on initial adoption, with limited consideration of how video consulting can be mainstreamed and sustained. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to do the following: (1) review and synthesize reported opportunities, challenges, and lessons learned in the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of video consultations, and (2) identify transferable insights that can inform policy and practice. METHODS: We identified papers through systematic searches in PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Included articles reported on synchronous, video-based consultations that had spread to more than one setting beyond an initial pilot or feasibility stage, and were published since 2010. We used the Nonadoption, Abandonment, and challenges to the Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework to synthesize findings relating to 7 domains: an understanding of the health condition(s) for which video consultations were being used, the material properties of the technological platform and relevant peripherals, the value proposition for patients and developers, the role of the adopter system, organizational factors, wider macro-level considerations, and emergence over time. RESULTS: We identified 13 papers describing 10 different video consultation services in 6 regions, covering the following: (1) video-to-home services, connecting providers directly to the patient; (2) hub-and-spoke models, connecting a provider at a central hub to a patient at a rural center; and (3) large-scale top-down evaluations scaled up or spread across a national health administration. Services covered rehabilitation, geriatrics, cancer surgery, diabetes, and mental health, as well as general specialist care and primary care. Potential enablers of spread and scale-up included embedded leadership and the presence of a telehealth champion, appropriate reimbursement mechanisms, user-friendly technology, pre-existing staff relationships, and adaptation (of technology and services) over time. Challenges tended to be related to service development, such as the absence of a long-term strategic plan, resistance to change, cost and reimbursement issues, and the technical experience of staff. There was limited articulation of the challenges to scale-up and spread of video consultations. This was combined with a lack of theorization, with papers tending to view spread and scale-up as the sum of multiple technical implementations, rather than theorizing the distinct processes required to achieve widespread adoption. CONCLUSIONS: There remains a significant lack of evidence that can support the spread and scale-up of video consulting. Given the recent pace of change due to COVID-19, a more definitive evidence base is urgently needed to support global efforts and match enthusiasm for extending use.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud/normas , Telemedicina/métodos , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normas , Humanos , Pandemias , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Approximately 20% of caregivers (CGs) live > 1 hour away from the patient and are considered distance caregivers (DCGs) who often report higher distress and anxiety than local CGs. The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of an intervention aimed at reducing anxiety and distress in DCGs of patients with cancer. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial enrolled DCGs of patients with all cancer types who were being seen monthly by oncologists in outpatient clinics. There were three arms of the intervention delivered over a 4-month period: arm 1 (a) received 4 monthly videoconference-tailored coaching sessions with an advanced practice nurse or social worker focused on information and support, (b) participated in patient's appointments with the oncologist via videoconference over the 4-month study period, and (c) had access to a website designed for DCGs. Arm 2 did not receive the coaching sessions but received the other two components, and arm 3 received access to the DCG website only. RESULTS: There were 302 DCGs who provided pre- and postintervention data. There were significant anxiety by group (P = .028 and r = 0.16) and distress by group interactions (P = .014 and r = 0.17). Arm 1 had the greatest percentage of DCGs who demonstrated improvement in anxiety (18.6%) and distress (25.2%). CONCLUSION: Coaching and use of videoconference technology (to join the DCG into the patient-oncologist office visit) were effective in reducing both anxiety and distress for DCGs. These components could be considered for local CGs who-with COVID-19-are unable to accompany the patient to oncologist visits.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , COVID-19/psicología , Cuidadores/psicología , Neoplasias/psicología , Adulto , Trastornos de Ansiedad/complicaciones , Trastornos de Ansiedad/patología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/patología , COVID-19/terapia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias/terapia , Oncólogos , Calidad de Vida , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Video consultation (VC) is gaining attention as a possible alternative to out-patient clinic visits. However, little is known in terms of attitude, satisfaction and quality of care using VC over a face-to-face (F2F) consultation. The aim of this observational survey study was to compare the attitude and satisfaction with VC amongst patients suffering from colorectal cancer and their treating surgeons at the outpatient surgical care clinic in a tertiary referral centre. METHODS: A patient-preference model was chosen following the concept of shared decision making. A total of fifty patients with colorectal cancer were asked to choose between VC- or a F2F-contact during their follow up at the outpatient surgical care clinic and were subsequently assigned to either the VC-group or the F2F-group. Attitude and satisfaction rates of both groups and their surgeons were measured using a questionnaire administered immediately after the consultation. RESULTS: Out of the 50 patients, 42% chose VC as their preferred follow-up modality. Patients demographics did not differ significantly. Patients who use video calling in their personal life choose VC significantly more often than patients lacking such experience (p = 0.010). These patients scored high on both the attitude- and satisfaction scale of the post-VC questionnaire. Patients who chose a F2F-contact seemed to question the ability of the surgeon to properly assess their healthcare condition by using a video connection more (p = 0.024). Surgeons were highly satisfied with the use of VC. CONCLUSIONS: Based on patient preference, VC is equivalent to a F2F consultation in terms of patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care. Shared decision making is preferred with regard to which contact modality is used during follow up. For easy uptake in other environments it is to be recommended to facilitate VC using the electronic patient portal.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Telemedicina/métodos , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normas , Anciano , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: During the current COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare has been transformed by the rapid switch from in person care to use of remote consulting, including video conferencing technology. Whilst much has been published on one-to-one video consultations, little literature exists on use of this technology to facilitate group interventions. Group pain management programmes are a core treatment provided by many pain services. This rapid review aimed to identify the extent of use of video conferencing technology for delivery of group pain management programmes and provide an overview of its use. METHODS: A rapid review of the literature published up to April 2020 (PubMed, PsycINFO and PEDro) was performed. The search string consisted of three domains: pain/CP (MeSH term) AND Peer group[MeSH] AND Videoconferencing[MeSH]/Telemedicine[MeSH]/Remote Consultation[MeSH]. The studies were of poor methodological quality and study design, and interventions and chronic pain conditions were varied. RESULTS: Literature searching yielded three eligible papers for this review. All studies had low methodological quality and risk of bias. Heterogeneity and variability in outcome reporting did not allow any pooling of data. The results demonstrated that videoconferencing for delivery of group programmes is possible, yet there is little extant literature on how to develop, deliver and measure outcomes of such programmes. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that there is little evidence to support or guide the use of synchronous videoconferencing to deliver pain management programmes. We present issues to consider, informed by this review and our experience, when implementing video conferencing. Study quality of existing work is variable, and extensive future research is necessary.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Manejo del Dolor , Telemedicina , Comunicación por Videoconferencia , Humanos , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Telemedicina/normas , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normasRESUMEN
Objective: COVID-19 challenges curriculum managers worldwide to create digital substitutes for classroom teaching. Case-based teaching formats under expert supervision can be used as a substitute for practical bedside teaching, where the focus is on teaching clinical reasoning skills. Methods: For medical students of LMU and TU Munich, the interactive, case-based, and supervised teaching format of Clinical Case Discussion (CCD) was digitised and implemented as dCCD in their respective curricula. Case discussions were realised as videoconferences, led by a student moderator, and took place under the supervision of a board-certified clinician. To prevent passive participation, additional cognitive activations were implemented. Acceptance, usability, and subjective learning outcomes were assessed in dCCDs by means of a special evaluation concept. Results: With regard to acceptance, students were of the opinion that they had learned effectively by participating in dCCDs (M=4.31; SD=1.37). The majority of students also stated that they would recommend the course to others (M=4.23; SD=1.62). The technical implementation of the teaching format was judged positively overall, but findings for usability were heterogeneous. Students rated their clinical reasoning skills at the end of the dCCDs (M=4.43; SD=0.66) as being significantly higher than at the beginning (M=4.33; SD=0.69), with low effect size, t(181)=-2.352, p=.020, d=0.15. Conclusion: Our evaluation data shows that the dCCD format is well-accepted by students as a substitute for face-to-face teaching. In the next step, we plan to examine the extent to which participation in dCCDs leads to an increase in objectively measured clinical reasoning skills, analogous to a face-to-face CCD with on-site attendance.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Educación a Distancia/organización & administración , Educación Médica/organización & administración , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/organización & administración , Competencia Clínica , Educación a Distancia/normas , Educación Médica/normas , Evaluación Educacional , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normasRESUMEN
SUMMARY: The Canadian Network for International Surgery (CNIS) hosted a workshop in May of 2020 with a goal of critically evaluating Trauma Team Training courses. The workshop was held virtually because of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Twenty-three participants attended from 8 countries: Canada, Guyana, Kenya, Nigeria, Switzerland, Tanzania, Uganda and the United States. More participants were able to attend the virtual meeting than the traditional in-person meetings. Web-based videoconference software was used, participants presented prerecorded PowerPoint videos, and questions were raised using a written chat. The review proved successful, with discussions and recommendations for improvements surrounding course quality, lecture content, skills sessions, curriculum variations and clinical practical scenarios. The CNIS's successful experience conducting an online curriculum review involving international participants may prove useful to others proceeding with collaborative projects during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Congresos como Asunto/organización & administración , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Curriculum , Cirugía General/educación , Cooperación Internacional , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , COVID-19 , Canadá/epidemiología , Congresos como Asunto/normas , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Cirugía General/métodos , Guyana/epidemiología , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Control de Infecciones/normas , Kenia/epidemiología , Nigeria/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Neumonía Viral/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Suiza/epidemiología , Tanzanía/epidemiología , Uganda/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/organización & administración , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normas , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Seeking health information on the internet is a popular trend. Xigua Video, a short video platform in China, ranks among the most accessed websites in the country and hosts an increasing number of videos with medical information. However, the nature of these videos is frequently unscientific, misleading, or even harmful. OBJECTIVE: Little is known about Xigua Video as a source of information on breast cancer. Thus, the study aimed to investigate the contents, quality, and reliability of breast cancer-related content on Xigua Video. METHODS: On February 4, 2020, a Xigua Video search was performed using the keyword "breast cancer." Videos were categorized by 2 doctors based on whether the video content provided useful or misleading information. Furthermore, the reliability and quality of the videos were assessed using the 5-point DISCERN tool and 5-point global quality score criteria. RESULTS: Out of the 170 videos selected for the study, 64 (37.6%) were classified as useful, whereas 106 (62.4%) provided misleading information. A total of 41.8% videos (71/170) were generated by individuals compared to 19.4% videos (33/170) contributed by health care professionals. The topics mainly covered etiology, anatomy, symptoms, preventions, treatments, and prognosis. The top topic was "treatments" (119/170, 70%). The reliability scores and global quality scores of the videos in the useful information group were high (P<.001). No differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of video length, duration in months, and comments. The number of total views was higher for the misleading information group (819,478.5 vs 647,940) but did not reach a level of statistical significance (P=.112). The uploading sources of the videos were mainly health care professionals, health information websites, medical advertisements, and individuals. Statistical differences were found between the uploading source groups in terms of reliability scores and global quality scores (P<.001). In terms of total views, video length, duration, and comments, no statistical differences were indicated among the said groups. However, a statistical difference was noted between the useful and misleading information video groups with respect to the uploading sources (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: A large number of Xigua videos pertaining to breast cancer contain misleading information. There is a need for accurate health information to be provided on Xigua Video and other social media; health care professionals should address this challenge.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Medios de Comunicación Sociales/normas , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normas , China , Femenino , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
Tele-neurology is a neurological consultation at a distance, or not in person, using various technologies to achieve connectivity, including the telephone and the internet. The telephone is ubiquitous and is a standard part of how we manage patients. Video consulting has been used for a long time in some centres, particularly in those where the geography means that patients have to travel long distances. Various technologies can be used, and with the development of various internet-based video-calling platforms, real-time video consulting has become much more accessible. We have provided a tele-neurology service in the North East of Scotland since 2006 using video conferencing with far-end camera control. More recently, we have complemented this using an internet-based platform (NHS Near Me). Here we outline the practicalities of video consulting in 'ordinary' times and comment on its use in the 'extraordinary' times of the coronavirus pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Examen Neurológico/tendencias , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Telemedicina/tendencias , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendencias , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Humanos , Examen Neurológico/métodos , Examen Neurológico/normas , Neurología/métodos , Neurología/normas , Neurología/tendencias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Derivación y Consulta/normas , SARS-CoV-2 , Escocia/epidemiología , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/normas , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normasRESUMEN
This article will familiarize the reader with useful tools and trouble-shooting tips for web-based conferencing. Radiology-based scenarios for web conferencing are also provided.
Asunto(s)
Radiología/métodos , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normas , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Internet , PandemiasAsunto(s)
Congresos como Asunto/organización & administración , Congresos como Asunto/tendencias , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/organización & administración , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendencias , Presupuestos , COVID-19 , Huella de Carbono/estadística & datos numéricos , Congresos como Asunto/economía , Congresos como Asunto/normas , Humanos , Pandemias , Investigadores/organización & administración , Sociedades Científicas/economía , Viaje/tendencias , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/economía , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many patients with mental disorders remain untreated. Video-based mental health care demonstrates comparable effectiveness to face-to-face treatments and is a promising mode for delivering specialized care within primary care. Nevertheless, professionals struggle with implementing video consultations in their daily practice. Specifically, little is known about mental health specialists' acceptance of mental health video consultations in routine practice. The PROVIDE (ImPROving cross-sectoral collaboration between primary and psychosocial care: An implementation study on VIDEo consultations) project aims to improve cross-sectoral collaboration between primary and psychosocial care through implementing video consultations in primary care. To increase the uptake of video consultations, it is crucial to account for necessary prerequisites and to tailor interventions to the needs of the target group prior to implementation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the acceptance of video consultations embedded in primary care from the perspectives of mental health specialists in Germany. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative, exploratory, preimplementation study in urban and rural counties. We conducted three semistructured focus groups with 11 mental health specialists. We used qualitative content analysis combining an inductive-deductive approach, applying the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases (TICD) framework to the text material, which comprises individual health professional factors; patient factors; professional interactions; incentives and resources; capacity for organizational change; social, political, and legal factors; and guideline factors. RESULTS: Against the background of long waiting times and a shortage of mental health specialists, especially in rural areas, participants valued video consultations as a potential means to improve access to mental health care. With respect to the TICD framework domains, the participants most often discussed individual health professional factors, followed by patient factors. All participants highlighted the importance of a trusting relationship between the patient and the therapist and doubted whether such a relationship could be established through video consultations (11/11, 100%). However, participants considered mental health specialist video consultations to be particularly suited for patients in rural areas, those with impaired mobility, and those who may otherwise remain untreated (6/11, 55%). Most participants expected video consultations to help the aforementioned patient groups avoid tedious searching for an available therapist and save on travel time and, therefore, improve access to specialized care for patients (7/11, 64%). Moreover, the participants expected video consultations to improve collaboration with the family physician (6/11, 55%). Finally, participants identified organizational aspects, such as reliable scheduling, the duration of the individual consultation (9/11, 82%), and reimbursement conditions (7/11, 67%), as key drivers for the acceptance and adoption of the model. CONCLUSIONS: While mental health specialists expect video consultations to improve access to specialized care for some patients, they consistently wonder whether such consultations can establish a trusting patient-therapist relationship. When implementing video consultations, these concerns should be addressed by training providers in managing technology-based treatment settings, with extra consideration for fostering the patients' and therapists' engagement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00012487; https://tinyurl.com/uhg2one.