[Laveran and the eradication of malaria in Corsica]. / Laveran et l'éradication du paludisme en Corse.

The observation of miasmas and fevers was attested in the region of Biguglia, South of Bastia, in 1499, confirmed during the 17th century. Drainage works on the eastern coast were started in 1770, abandoned during the revolutionary period, restarted under the Second Empire, with few results on the endemic. Thus in 1875, 80% of the inhabitants of the eastern plain were considered on their appearance to suffer malaria. The rural population was miserable, the mortality high. However, it was not possible to distinguish the responsibility of malaria among the other fevers.In 1899 and following years, A. Laveran was in Corsica. He confirmed the presence of Anopheles in the localities where malaria was present. He encouraged the creation in Bastia in 1902 of the Corsican League against Malaria and he chaired it. The actions of this League were based on the fight against the larvae by chemical destruction, on the use of mosquito nets and on massive and free preventive "quininisation". A sanitation and development law for Corsica was passed in 1911. Initial results were observed, confirmed by Léger and Arlo (1913) [6]. After WW1, the activities started again, in particular by Sergent and Sergent. An antimalarial application station, subsidized by the Rockefeller Foundation, was created in Bastia in 1925, supported by the laboratory of parasitology of the Faculty of Medicine of Paris. Plasmodium falciparum was predominant, transmitted essentially by Anopheles labranchiae of the maculipennis complex, up to an altitude of 500 m. The role of population displacements, linked to pastoral practices, the absence of stables and therefore of zoonotic deviation of anopheles were underlined.The liberation of Corsica in October 1943 allowed the installation by the American army of numerous airfields on the eastern plain. An intense local mosquito control by DDT was then carried out, impressing the population. However, malaria prospered on the island with an acme of indices in 1947. From 1948, campaigns of spraying insecticide against adults, chemical control of larvae or use of larvivorous fish, treatment of patients in dispensaries led to very good results. Since 1953, malaria transmission is interrupted in Corsica excepted 30 indigenous cases in 1970-71. Currently, the situation in Corsica of an anophelism without malaria is considered to be under control with a low risk of resumption of a localized transmission.

The World Health Organization's changing goals and expectations concerning malaria, 1948-2019.

From its inception, in 1948, the World Health Organization made control of malaria a high priority. Early successes led many to believe that eradication was possible, although there were serious doubts concerning the continent of Africa. As evidence mounted that eradicating malaria was not a simple matter, the malaria eradication programme was downgraded to a unit in 1980. Revived interest in malaria followed the Roll Back Malaria Initiative adopted in 1998. This article presents an historical account of the globally changing ideas on control and elimination of the disease and argues that insufficient attention was paid to strengthening health services and specialized human resources.

The World Health Organizations changing goals and expectations concerning malaria, 1948-2019 / As mudanças nos objetivos e expectativas da Organização Mundial da Saúde com relação à malária, 1948-2019

Abstract From its inception, in 1948, the World Health Organization made control of malaria a high priority. Early successes led many to believe that eradication was possible, although there were serious doubts concerning the continent of Africa. As evidence mounted that eradicating malaria was not a simple matter, the malaria eradication programme was downgraded to a unit in 1980. Revived interest in malaria followed the Roll Back Malaria Initiative adopted in 1998. This article presents an historical account of the globally changing ideas on control and elimination of the disease and argues that insufficient attention was paid to strengthening health services and specialized human resources.

Resumo Desde sua origem, em 1948, a Organização Mundial da Saúde priorizou o controle da malária. Os primeiros êxitos induziram à crença na viabilidade da erradicação, apesar de sérias dúvidas quanto ao continente africano. À medida que se somavam comprovações de que a erradicação da malária não seria simples, o projeto com essa finalidade foi rebaixado a uma unidade em 1980. O reavivamento do interesse na malária ocorreu após a iniciativa Roll Back Malaria, criada em 1998. Este artigo apresenta um panorama histórico das mudanças nas ideias, em âmbito global, ligadas ao controle e à eliminação da doença e defende a tese de que a atenção dada ao fortalecimento dos serviços de saúde e a recursos humanos especializados foi insuficiente.

2019 AMCA Memorial Lecture Honoree: William Richard Opp 1942-2017 A Life Well Lived Helping Others.

Since 1979 more than 40 individuals have been recognized for their lifetime achievements in the AMCA Memorial Lecture. These individuals have included luminaries such as Carlos Finlay, Leland Osian Howard, William Herms, Andy Spielman, and, most recently, Fred Knapp (2018). Only one of these individuals recognized, Harold Gray in 1987, was an engineer. Engineers are problem solvers, and mosquito control is, most assuredly, an enterprise fraught with problems. Thus, the selection of William R. Opp as the 2019 honoree is both timely and well deserved. Bill Opp's career is a testament to an individual who made a difference in the lives of countless individuals.

Anopheles gambiae in Brazil: the background to a "silent spread," 1930-1932. / Anopheles gambiae no Brasil: antecedentes para um "alastramento silencioso", 1930-1932.

The article analyzes the arrival and identification of the African mosquito Anopheles gambiae in Brazil in 1930, and the initial reactions of scientists and public health authorities against the epidemics of malaria caused by this species. Although this mosquito was recognized as a dangerous vector of malaria, its presence in Brazil was neglected after initial emergency actions in the city of Natal in 1932; this encouraged it to spread silently, resulting in a major malaria epidemic in 1938. This article examines scientific and political issues which caused the fight against mosquitoes to be pushed into the background until 1937 in cooperative efforts between the Rockefeller Foundation's International Health Division and the Brazilian authorities.

O artigo analisa a chegada e identificação do mosquito africano Anopheles gambiae no Brasil em 1930 e as primeiras reações de cientistas e autoridades de saúde pública contra as epidemias de malária causadas por essa espécie. Apesar de ter sido reconhecido como perigoso vetor da malária, sua presença em território nacional foi negligenciada a partir de 1932, após ações emergenciais na capital do Rio Grande do Norte, favorecendo um alastramento silencioso que resultou em uma grande epidemia de malária em 1938. São abordadas questões científicas e políticas que contribuíram para que o combate ao mosquito fosse colocado em segundo plano nas articulações entre a Divisão Sanitária Internacional da Fundação Rockefeller e autoridades brasileiras até 1937.

Anopheles gambiae no Brasil: antecedentes para um " alastramento silencioso ", 1930-1932 / Anopheles gambiae in Brazil: the background to a " silent spread, " 1930-1932

Resumo O artigo analisa a chegada e identificação do mosquito africano Anopheles gambiae no Brasil em 1930 e as primeiras reações de cientistas e autoridades de saúde pública contra as epidemias de malária causadas por essa espécie. Apesar de ter sido reconhecido como perigoso vetor da malária, sua presença em território nacional foi negligenciada a partir de 1932, após ações emergenciais na capital do Rio Grande do Norte, favorecendo um alastramento silencioso que resultou em uma grande epidemia de malária em 1938. São abordadas questões científicas e políticas que contribuíram para que o combate ao mosquito fosse colocado em segundo plano nas articulações entre a Divisão Sanitária Internacional da Fundação Rockefeller e autoridades brasileiras até 1937.

Abstract The article analyzes the arrival and identification of the African mosquito Anopheles gambiae in Brazil in 1930, and the initial reactions of scientists and public health authorities against the epidemics of malaria caused by this species. Although this mosquito was recognized as a dangerous vector of malaria, its presence in Brazil was neglected after initial emergency actions in the city of Natal in 1932; this encouraged it to spread silently, resulting in a major malaria epidemic in 1938. This article examines scientific and political issues which caused the fight against mosquitoes to be pushed into the background until 1937 in cooperative efforts between the Rockefeller Foundation's International Health Division and the Brazilian authorities.

[Next-generation vector control]. / La lutte contre les vecteurs : quel avenir ?

Vector control is a cornerstone of vector-borne infectious disease control, a group of emerging and re-emerging diseases of major public health concern at a global scale. The history and evolution of mosquito disease vectors control, mainly based on the use of chemical insecticides, is emblematic of the successes, failures, lessons learned and experiences gained in setting-up and implementing vector control, and of the challenges that pave the way to sustainable disease vector management. This paper provides a non-exhaustive and non-exclusive overview of some of the most promising cutting-edge technical and strategic innovations that are committed to this endeavour, assessing the strength of scientific evidences for proof of concept, perspectives for scaling-up, and expected impact and outcomes in a rapidly changing world.

Malaria control by commodities without practical malariology.

Malaria remains a serious clinical and public health problem, the object of an ongoing technological and humanitarian struggle to abate the very substantial harm done. The manner by which humanity approached malaria control changed abruptly and profoundly after 1945 with the advent of the insecticide DDT. Malariologists in the first half of the twentieth century conceived precise modifications to natural or man-made environments aimed at making those less hospitable to specific anopheline mosquito vector species. This practical malariology achieved very significant reductions in burdens of morbidity and mortality, but the revolutionary insecticide eliminated the need for its specialized knowledge and diverse practices. By 1970 mosquito resistance to DDT and perceived environmental concerns precipitated the collapse of what had been a vigorous global campaign to eradicate malaria. Humanity did not then revitalize practical malariology but turned to another commodity as the foundation of control strategy, the war-spurred suite of synthetic antimalarial drugs developed in the 1940s and 1950s. When those drugs became lost to parasite resistance in the latter twentieth century, malaria resurged globally. Since 2005, tens of billions of dollars mobilized new commodities to control malaria: point-of-care diagnostics, effective artemisinin-based treatments, and longer-lasting insecticide treated bed nets. The know-how of practical malariology is not part of that ongoing commodities-based strategy. This article examines contemporary malaria control in the broad strokes of a strategy mitigating the consequences of infection contrasted to that of the abandoned practical malariology strategy of prevention. The inherent risks and limitations of over-reliance upon commodities in striving to control malaria may prompt consideration of a strategic posture inclusive of the proven methods of practical malariology.

Leaking Containers: Success and Failure in Controlling the Mosquito Aedes aegypti in Brazil.

In 1958, the Pan American Health Organization declared that Brazil had successfully eradicated the mosquito Aedes aegypti, responsible for the transmission of yellow fever, dengue fever, chikungunya, and Zika virus. Yet in 2016 the Brazilian minister of health described the situation of dengue fever as "catastrophic." Discussing the recent epidemic of Zika virus, which amplified the crisis produced by the persistence of dengue fever, Brazil's president declared in January 2016 that "we are in the process of losing the war against the mosquito Aedes aegypti." I discuss the reasons for the failure to contain Aedes in Brazil and the consequences of this failure. A longue durée perspective favors a view of the Zika epidemic that does not present it as a health crisis to be contained with a technical solution alone but as a pathology that has the persistence of deeply entrenched structural problems and vulnerabilities.

Methods and procedures used in Aedes aegypti control in the successful campaign for yellow fever prophylaxis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1928 and 1929. / Métodos e procedimentos usados no controle do Aedes aegypti na bem-sucedida campanha de profilaxia da febre amarela de 1928 e 1929 no Rio de Janeiro.

OBJECTIVE: to review the challenges and procedures used in Aedes aegypti control and the characteristics of the epidemics in the successful campaign, led by Clementino Fraga, for yellow fever control in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1928 and 1929, before the vaccine (1937) and DDT (1947). METHODS: a literature review was conducted by searching official reports, scientific journals and historic textbooks on this subject. RESULTS: the A. aegypti control was achieved through the hard and organized work of breeding site police teams, priority in eliminating breeding sites through environmental management measures and a qualified training program for the teams. CONCLUSION: the reports demonstrate a set of simple but laborious procedures that could effectively control mosquitoes in urban environment through the work of the teams, who were committed to environmental management measures, aiming at eliminating breeding sites and were capable of handling social and environmental obstacles.

Estratégias de controle do Aedes aegypti: uma revisão / Aedes aegypti control strategies: a review / Estrategias de control del Aedes aegypti: una revisión

OBJETIVO: descrever as principais estratégias de controle do Aedes aegypti, com ênfase nas inovações tecnológicas promissoras para utilização no Brasil. MÉTODOS: trata-se de estudo de revisão não sistemática da literatura. RESULTADOS: diversas tecnologias têm sido desenvolvidas como alternativas no controle do Ae. aegypti, utilizando-se diferentes mecanismos de ação - como monitoramento seletivo da infestação, medidas sociais, dispersão de inseticidas, novos agentes de controle biológico e técnicas moleculares para controle populacional dos mosquitos -, considerando-se também a combinação entre elas. As tecnologias em desenvolvimento demandam avaliação da eficácia, viabilidade e custos para implementação como estratégias complementares às ações já preconizadas pelo Programa Nacional de Controle da Dengue. CONCLUSÃO: a integração de diferentes estratégias de controle vetorial compatíveis e eficazes, considerando as tecnologias disponíveis e as características regionais, parece ser um método viável para tentar reduzir a infestação dos mosquitos e a incidência das arboviroses transmitidas por eles.

OBJECTIVE: to describe the main strategies to control Aedes aegypti, with emphasis on promising technological innovations for use in Brazil. METHODS: this study is a non-systematic review of the literature. Results: several technologies have been developed as alternatives in the control of Ae. aegypti, using different mechanisms of action, such as selective monitoring of the infestation, social interventions, dispersing insecticides, new biological control agents and molecular techniques for population control of mosquitoes, also considering the combination between them. Evolving technologies require evaluation of the effectiveness, feasibility and costs of implementation strategies as complementary to the actions already recommended by the National Program for Dengue Control. CONCLUSION: the integration of different compatible and effective vector control strategies, considering the available technologies and regional characteristics, appears to be a viable method to try to reduce the infestation of mosquitoes and the incidence of arbovirus transmitted by them.

Waging War on Mosquitoes: Scientific Research and the Formation of Mosquito Brigades in French West Africa, 1899-1920.

While the majority of colonial public health officials in Africa intermittently used measures for mosquito containment, the government of French West Africa made the creation of what were called mosquito brigades into a vital element of urban sanitary policy. The project seemed to offer a chance to curb the impact of mosquito-borne disease on the colonial economy. Yet, despite the full support of sanitary policy on the federal, colonial, and local levels, the government found that conducting a "War on Mosquitoes" was far more difficult than they originally envisioned. The colonial government's mosquito brigades were understaffed and often ran into resistance from both the African and European populations. Above all, the government's urban mosquito control programs failed because their goal of controlling the breeding of mosquitoes lay beyond the limited capabilities of the both local government and the Federation's health and sanitation services. This paper will examine the origins and fate of the French West African mosquito brigades and provide a context for analyzing their atypical place among colonial efforts at malaria prevention.

2015 AMCA Memorial Lecture Honoree: Dr. Richard Floyd Darsie, Jr.

Richard Floyd Darsie, Jr. (1915-2014) is the 2015 American Mosquito Control Association Memorial Lecture Honoree. He was one of the greatest mosquito taxonomists of the 20th century and died peacefully on April 10, 2014, in Grove City, PA, at the age of 99 after a professional career that spanned eight decades. Dick's broad areas of interest and training made him a versatile scientist, teacher, and researcher. His intense interest in adult and immature mosquito morphology and taxonomy, as well as mosquito distribution and bionomics, started early in his career at two early academic postings: Franklin and Marshall College (1949-54) and the University of Delaware (1954-62). Dick would take his mosquito interests with him to postings and research projects around the world: Nepal, the Philippines, Atlanta, El Salvador, Guatemala, Fort Collins, South Carolina, Argentina, and Florida. His travels and studies would make him an international expert on mosquito taxonomy. Dick's legacy lives on in the hundreds of students from across the globe who learned mosquito identification skills from this world-renowned mosquito taxonomist. All will proudly profess that, "I learned mosquito identification from Dr. Darsie." And that is all that is needed to prove one's credentials in the field, learning the art from the best there is.