Response to Crizotinib After Entrectinib Resistance in ROS1-Rearranged, MET-Amplified Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Crizotinib successfully overcomes MET amplification in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC after entrectinib failure.

Correlation between ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer targeted therapy and thrombosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The main adjuvant therapies for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer include ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and chemotherapy. We aimed to compare differences in the incidence of thromboembolism (TE) among different treatment options. DESIGN: Using a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Science databases before 10 June 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included published randomised controlled trials (RCT) involving comparisons of treatments between chemotherapy and ALK-TKI drugs. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Assessed risk bias with Cochrane tool. Conducted NMA with GEMTC in R, we evaluate the model fit using the deviation information criteria. Estimated posterior distribution using Markov Chain Monte Carlo, 4 chains, 10 fine-tuned iterations, 10 000 iterations per chain, total 50 000 iterations. Monitored potential scale reduction factor for convergence. And checked convergence with Gelman-Rubin statistics and trace plot. Provided surface under the cumulative ranking, lower values indicate less TE event probability. RESULTS: Analysis of eight RCTs showed that, compared with that for crizotinib, there was a lower risk of total TE with chemotherapy (OR, 0.28; 95% credible intervals (CrI) 0.11 to 0.63), brigatinib (OR 0.31; 95% CrI 0.11 to 0.79) and ceritinib (OR 0.13; 95% CrI 0.03 to 0.45). In addition, analysis of venous TE (VTE) showed similar results, with a lower occurrence for chemotherapy (OR 0.27; 95% CrI 0.1 to 0.62), brigatinib (OR 0.18; 95% CrI 0.04 to 0.6) and ceritinib (OR 0.1; 95% CrI 0.02 to 0.43) compared with that for crizotinib. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of arterial TE among the different treatment options. CONCLUSION: Compared with chemotherapy, alectinib, lorlatinib, brigatinib and ceritinib, crizotinib significantly increased the risk of TE and VTE. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023373307.

Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Harboring ROS1 Rearrangement: Real World Testing Practices, Characteristics and Treatment Patterns (ROS1REAL Study).

ROS1 rearrangements are considered rare in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective real-world study aimed to evaluate first-line treatment with crizotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) standard of care vs. new generation ROS1 anti-cancer agents. Forty-nine ROS1-expressing NSCLC patients, diagnosed with advanced metastatic disease, were included. Molecular profiling using either FISH/CISH or NGS was performed on tissue samples. Twenty-eight patients were treated with crizotinib, while fourteen patients were administered newer drugs (entrectinib, repotrectinib) and seven patients received platinum-doublet chemotherapy in a first-line setting. Overall response rate and disease control rate for the crizotinib and entrectinb/repotrectinib cohort were 68% and 82% vs. 86% and 93%, respectively. Median progression free survival was 1.6 years (95% CI 1.15-2.215) for the crizotinib treatment vs. 2.35 years for the entrectinib/repotrectinib cohort (95% CI 1.19-3.52). Central nervous system progression was noted in 20% and 25% of the crizotinib and entrectinib/repotrectinib cohorts, respectively. This multi-center study presents real-world treatment patterns of ROS1 NSCLC population, indicating that crizotinib exhibited comparable results to entrectinib/repotrectinib in a first-line setting, although both response rate and survival was numerically longer with treatment with newer agents.

Real-world evidence of brigatinib as second-line treatment after crizotinib for ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer using South Korean claims data (K-AREAL).

PURPOSE: There is a lack of real-world data in Asian populations for brigatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study analysed real-world outcomes and dosing patterns for brigatinib in patients with crizotinib-refractory ALK+ NSCLC in South Korea. METHODS: This retrospective, non-interventional, cohort study used South Korean Health Insurance and Review Assessment claims data for adults with ALK+ NSCLC who initiated brigatinib between 19 April 2019 and 31 March 2021 after receiving prior crizotinib. Patients' characteristics, time to discontinuation (TTD), time to dose reduction, overall survival (OS) and treatment adherence were assessed. RESULTS: The study included 174 patients (56.9% male; 27.0% with a history of brain metastases). Median duration of prior crizotinib was 17 (range 0.3-48) months. Median follow-up after brigatinib initiation was 18 (range 0-34) months. Overall, 88.5% of patients received full-dose brigatinib (180 mg/day) and 93.1% of patients were adherent (proportion of days covered ≥0.8). The median TTD was 24.9 months (95% CI 15.2-not reached). The probability of continuing treatment was 63.2% at 1 year and 51.5% at 2 years. The probability of continuing at full or peak dose was 79.7% at 1 year and 75.6% at 2 years. Median OS was not reached. The 2-year OS rate was 68.7%. CONCLUSIONS: In this first nationwide retrospective study using national insurance claim data, brigatinib demonstrated real-world clinical benefit as second-line treatment after prior crizotinib in ALK+ NSCLC patients in South Korea.

Impact of PD-L1 expression on the efficacy of first-line crizotinib in advanced ROS1-rearranged NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: The predictive value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression for the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with advanced ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains underexplored. This study analyzed patients with advanced NSCLC harboring ROS1 rearrangements who received first-line crizotinib to evaluate the correlation between baseline PD-L1 expression and crizotinib efficacy. METHODS: In this study, the clinical data from 371 patients diagnosed with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC at Shanghai Chest Hospital between November 2017 and December 2022 were reviewed. The patients were categorized into three groups according to the baseline PD-L1 expression: tumor proportion score (TPS) <1%, TPS 1 %-49 %, and TPS≥50 %. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) following first-line crizotinib treatment were measured. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were included in the analysis, with 16 patients in the TPS<1% group, 22 in the TPS 1 %-49 % group, and 26 in the TPS≥50 % group. The overall DCR was 100 %, and the overall ORR was 76.5 %. The ORRs were 81.2 % (13/16) in the TPS<1% group, 63.6 % (14/22) in the TPS 1 %-49 % group, and 84.6 % (22/26) in the TPS≥50 % group (p = 0.218). The median PFS across all patients was 20.21 months (95 % CI: 15.71-24.71), with a median PFS of 28.96 months (95 % CI: 19.87-38.04) in the TPS<1% group, 17.56 months (95 % CI: 12.25-22.86) in the TPS 1 %-49 % group, and 25.85 months (95 % CI: 18.52-33.17) in the TPS≥50 % group (p = 0.100). The median PFS for patients with CD74 fusion was 18.23 months (95 % CI: 15.24-21.22), while those with non-CD74 fusion exhibited a PFS of 16.49 months (95 % CI: 9.75-23.23) (p = 0.359). CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced ROS1-rearranged NSCLC were found to benefit from first-line crizotinib treatment, irrespective of baseline PD-L1 expression.

Efficacy and Safety of Taletrectinib in Chinese Patients With ROS1+ Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase II TRUST-I Study.

PURPOSE: Taletrectinib, a highly potent, CNS-active, ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has demonstrated high and durable response rates, high intracranial objective response rate (ORR), prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), and activity against G2032R with a favorable safety profile. We report outcomes from the pivotal TRUST-I study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04395677) of taletrectinib for ROS1+ non-small cell lung cancer in China. METHODS: TRUST-I evaluated TKI-naїve and crizotinib-pretreated patients. The primary end point was confirmed ORR (cORR) by independent review committee; key secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), PFS, and safety. RESULTS: As of November 2023, 173 patients were enrolled (median age, 55 years; 58% female; 73% never smoked; TKI naїve: n = 106; crizotinib pretreated: n = 67). In TKI-naїve patients, cORR and intracranial cORR were 91% and 88%, respectively, and 52% and 73% in crizotinib-pretreated patients. In TKI-naїve patients, median DOR and median PFS were not reached (NR) with 22.1-month and 23.5-month follow-up, respectively. In crizotinib-pretreated patients, the median DOR was 10.6 months (95% CI, 6.3 months to NR; 8.4-month follow-up), and the median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 12.0 months; 9.7-month follow-up). Eight of 12 patients (67%) with G2032R mutations responded. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were increased AST (76%), diarrhea (70%), and increased ALT (68%), most of which were grade 1-2. Incidences of neurologic TEAEs were low (dizziness: 23%; dysgeusia: 10%) and mostly grade 1. Discontinuations (5%) and dose reductions (19%) due to TEAEs were low. CONCLUSION: Taletrectinib continues to show high and durable overall responses, prolonged PFS, robust activity against intracranial lesions and acquired resistance mutations including G2032R, and a favorable safety profile with a low incidence of neurologic TEAEs.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Across Three Lines of Therapy in Patients with ALK+ NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard first- and second-line treatment for advanced ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated outcomes in patients with ALK+ NSCLC receiving third-line ALK TKI versus non-ALK-directed therapy. METHODS: Flatiron Health OncoEMR data were extracted for patients with ALK+ NSCLC initiating first-line ALK TKI between January 2015 and March 2022 followed by second-line ALK TKI and third-line ALK TKI (group A) or non-TKI therapy (group B). Time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using multivariate modelling. RESULTS: Among patients receiving third-line ALK TKI (A, n = 85) or non-TKI therapy (B, n = 43), most received first-line crizotinib (A/B: 64%/60%) and second-line alectinib (36%/30%), ceritinib (24%/19%), or lorlatinib (15%/30%). Common third-line treatments were lorlatinib/alectinib (41%/33%) in A and immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or chemotherapy + immunotherapy (30%/28%/21%) in B. Group A versus B had longer TTD of first-line treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.93; p = 0.020) and second-line treatment (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.75; p < 0.001) and longer OS from start of first-line treatment (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19-0.54; p < 0.001) and second-line treatment (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.66; p < 0.001). For third-line treatment, median TTD (A/B) was 6.2/2.4 months (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-1.00; p = 0.049) and OS was 17.6/6.5 months (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.98; p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving third-line non-ALK-directed therapy had suboptimal outcomes on prior TKIs. Patients with longer duration of prior ALK TKI treatment appeared to benefit from third-line ALK TKIs.

Prolonged Response to Afatinib and Crizotinib in a Rare Case of EGFR-, HER2-, MET- and ROS1-Alterated Lung Adenocarcinoma.

We present the case of a 70-year-old never-smoking female patient with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) p.L858R-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). After three months of first-line treatment with erlotinib, progression occurred and platinum/pemetrexed was initiated, followed by a response for more than two years. After the progression, the molecular testing of a vertebral metastasis revealed a ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) translocation and a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) p.S310F mutation, in addition to the known EGFR p.L858R mutation. Crizotinib then led to a durable response of 17 months. The molecular retesting of the tumour cells obtained from the recurrent pleural effusion revealed the absence of the ROS1 translocation, whereas the EGFR and HER2 mutations were still present. Afatinib was added to the crizotinib, and the combination treatment resulted in another durable response of more than two years. The patient died more than 7 years after the initial diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC. This case demonstrates that the repeated molecular testing of metastatic NSCLC may identify new druggable genomic alterations that can impact the patient management and improve the patient outcome.

Progression patterns, resistant mechanisms and subsequent therapy for ALK-positive NSCLC in the era of second-generation ALK-TKIs.

BACKGROUND: In the era of second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs), there was a paucity of data regarding the progression patterns, resistant mechanisms, and subsequent therapeutic approaches for ALK-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC were retrospectively selected from our center. Cohort 1 consisted of patients who experienced disease progression after receiving first-line alectinib treatment (n = 20), while Cohort 2 included patients who progressed following sequential treatment with crizotinib and second-generation ALK-TKIs (n = 53). Oligo-progression was defined as the occurrence of disease progression in no more than three lesions. Symptomatic progression was determined when patients developed new symptoms or experienced worsening of pre-existing symptoms during radiological progression. RESULTS: The incidence of central nervous system (CNS) progression and symptomatic CNS progression was significantly lower in Cohort 1 compared to patients treated with crizotinib, with rates of 15.0% vs. 56.6% (p = 0.002) and 5.0% vs. 32.1% (p = 0.016), respectively. A total of 60.3% (44/73) patients underwent repeated biopsy and next-generation sequencing subsequent to the second-generation ALK-TKI resistance, with secondary mutation in ALK kinase domain emerging as the predominant mechanism of resistance (56.8%). Local therapy was applied to 50% of oligo-progression cases. Subsequent ALK-TKIs demonstrated significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (8.6 m vs. 2.7 m, p = 0.021, HR = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.15-0.85) and long-term overall survival (OS) (NA vs. 11.9 m, p = 0.132, HR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.18-1.25) in patients harboring ALK resistance mutations, compared to those without such mutations. For patients without ALK-resistant mutations following progression on second-generation ALK-TKIs, there was no statistically significant difference in survival outcomes between subsequent chemotherapy or alternative ALK-TKI treatments. CONCLUSIONS: First-line alectinib demonstrated superior efficacy in protecting the CNS compared to crizotinib. For patients with ALK-resistant mutations following the resistance to second-generation ALK-TKIs, appropriate sensitive ALK-TKI should be administered; for those without such mutations, the selection of chemotherapy or third-generation ALK-TKI should be based on the patient's overall physical health and personal preferences.

Capmatinib is an effective treatment for MET-fusion driven pediatric high-grade glioma and synergizes with radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric-type diffuse high-grade glioma (pHGG) is the most frequent malignant brain tumor in children and can be subclassified into multiple entities. Fusion genes activating the MET receptor tyrosine kinase often occur in infant-type hemispheric glioma (IHG) but also in other pHGG and are associated with devastating morbidity and mortality. METHODS: To identify new treatment options, we established and characterized two novel orthotopic mouse models harboring distinct MET fusions. These included an immunocompetent, murine allograft model and patient-derived orthotopic xenografts (PDOX) from a MET-fusion IHG patient who failed conventional therapy and targeted therapy with cabozantinib. With these models, we analyzed the efficacy and pharmacokinetic properties of three MET inhibitors, capmatinib, crizotinib and cabozantinib, alone or combined with radiotherapy. RESULTS: Capmatinib showed superior brain pharmacokinetic properties and greater in vitro and in vivo efficacy than cabozantinib or crizotinib in both models. The PDOX models recapitulated the poor efficacy of cabozantinib experienced by the patient. In contrast, capmatinib extended survival and induced long-term progression-free survival when combined with radiotherapy in two complementary mouse models. Capmatinib treatment increased radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks and delayed their repair. CONCLUSIONS: We comprehensively investigated the combination of MET inhibition and radiotherapy as a novel treatment option for MET-driven pHGG. Our seminal preclinical data package includes pharmacokinetic characterization, recapitulation of clinical outcomes, coinciding results from multiple complementing in vivo studies, and insights into molecular mechanism underlying increased efficacy. Taken together, we demonstrate the groundbreaking efficacy of capmatinib and radiation as a highly promising concept for future clinical trials.

Population modeling analyses of crizotinib in pediatric patients with ALK-positive advanced cancers.

BACKGROUND: Alterations in the ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) gene play a critical role in pathogenesis of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Crizotinib is a small molecule competitive inhibitor of ALK, ROS1, and MET kinases and was approved for pediatric patients with ALK-positive relapsed or refractory, systemic ALCL, and ALK-positive unresectable, recurrent, or refractory inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMT). PROCEDURE: Crizotinib data from pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, IMT, or ALCL were included in the analyses. All patients received crizotinib orally at doses ranging from 100 to 365 mg/m2 twice daily (BID). PopPK analyses were conducted to characterize crizotinib disposition in pediatric patients. Exposure-response (ER) safety and antitumor analyses were conducted to characterize relationships between crizotinib dose or exposure with safety and antitumor activity endpoints of interest. RESULTS: The population pharmacokinetic (popPK), ER safety, and ER antitumor analysis included 98, 110, and 36 pediatric patients, respectively. A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model with allometric scaling, first-order elimination, and first-order absorption with lag time adequately described the data. Natural log-transformed model-predicted crizotinib AUCss (steady-state area under the concentration-time curve) demonstrated a significant, positive relationship with Grade ≥3 NEUTROPENIA and Any Grade VISION DISORDER. Crizotinib dose demonstrated a positive relationship with objective response rate. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in PK were identified across a wide range of ages or across tumor types, suggesting body surface area (BSA)-based dosing adequately adjusted for differences in patient size to achieve similar systemic crizotinib exposures across young children and adolescent pediatric patients. None of the myelosuppressive events except Grade ≥3 NEUTROPENIA had significant relationships identified with crizotinib dose or exposure, suggesting crizotinib is a tolerable treatment with less hematological toxicity than traditional chemotherapy regimens for pediatric patients with ALK-mutated cancers. Results from the presented analyses support the pediatric dosing recommendations in the product label.

Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib in Patients With Advanced ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes From the Phase III CROWN Study.

PURPOSE: Lorlatinib improved progression-free survival (PFS) and intracranial activity versus crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced, ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the phase III CROWN study. Here, we report long-term outcomes from CROWN after 5 years of follow-up. METHODS: Two hundred ninety-six patients with ALK-positive NSCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive lorlatinib 100 mg once daily (n = 149) or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (n = 147). This post hoc analysis presents updated investigator-assessed efficacy outcomes, safety, and biomarker analyses. RESULTS: With a median follow-up for PFS of 60.2 and 55.1 months, respectively, median PFS was not reached (NR [95% CI, 64.3 to NR]) with lorlatinib and 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 10.9) with crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.27]); 5-year PFS was 60% (95% CI, 51 to 68) and 8% (95% CI, 3 to 14), respectively. Median time to intracranial progression was NR (95% CI, NR to NR) with lorlatinib and 16.4 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 21.9) with crizotinib (HR, 0.06 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.12]). Safety profile was consistent with that in prior analyses. Emerging new ALK resistance mutations were not detected in circulating tumor DNA collected at the end of lorlatinib treatment. CONCLUSION: After 5 years of follow-up, median PFS has yet to be reached in the lorlatinib group, corresponding to the longest PFS ever reported with any single-agent molecular targeted treatment in advanced NSCLC and across all metastatic solid tumors. These results coupled with prolonged intracranial efficacy and absence of new safety signals represent an unprecedented outcome for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC and set a new benchmark for targeted therapies in cancer.

Efficacy and safety of crizotinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ROS1 gene fusion: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of real-world evidence.

BACKGROUND: Crizotinib was approved to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) gene fusion in 2016. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify real-world evidence (RWE) studies and estimated the efficacy and safety of crizotinib using meta-analyses (MA) for objective response rate (ORR), real-world progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE®, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from January 2016 to March 2023 using Ovid® for published single-arm or comparative RWE studies evaluating patients (N ≥ 20) receiving crizotinib monotherapy for aNSCLC with ROS1 gene fusion. Pooled estimates for ORR and grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were derived using the metafor package in R while pooled estimates for median real-world PFS (rwPFS) and OS were derived using reconstructed individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier curves. The primary analysis included all studies regardless of crizotinib line of therapy; a subgroup analysis (SA) was conducted using studies evaluating patients receiving first-line crizotinib. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the eligibility criteria and were considered feasible for MA. For the primary analysis, the pooled ORR (N = 9 studies) was 70.6 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 57.0, 81.3), median rwPFS was 14.5 months (N = 11 studies), and OS was 40.2 months (N = 9 studies). In the SA, the pooled ORR (N = 4 studies) was 81.1 % (95 % CI: 76.1, 85.2) and the median rwPFS (N = 4 studies) and OS (N = 2 studies) were 18.1 and 60 months, respectively. All MAs were associated with significant heterogeneity (I2 > 25 %). Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 18.7 % of patients (pooled estimate). CONCLUSION: The results from this study are consistent with clinical trial data and, taken collectively, supports crizotinib as a safe and effective treatment across different lines of therapy in patients with ROS1 aNSCLC in the real-world setting.

Phase 2 trial of crizotinib in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC harboring a MET gene alteration: a Co-MET study.

BACKGROUND: MET exon 14 skipping mutations occur in 3-4% and MET high amplifications occur in < 1% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Crizotinib, a selective ATP-competitive small-molecule inhibitor of c-Met, ALK, and ROS1 tyrosine kinases, has shown activity in cancer models with various types of MET activation. METHODS: The Co-MET study is a single-arm phase 2 trial to assess the safety and efficacy of crizotinib in MET inhibitor-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutation (cohort 1) or high MET gene copy number of ≥ 7 (cohort 2). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by independent radiology review in cohort 1. The key secondary endpoints were the duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients (23 in cohort 1 and 5 in cohort 2) were enrolled between March 2018 and February 2020. The primary endpoint was met as the ORR (90% confidence interval: CI) in cohort 1 was 38.1% (20.6-58.3). Median DoR, PFS, and OS (95% CI) were 7.6 (1.9-NE), 5.7 (2.1-11.3), 9.1 (4.0-19.9) months, respectively, in cohort 1. ORR in cohort 2 was 40.0% (18.9-92.4). The safety signals were generally consistent with the known safety profile of crizotinib. CONCLUSIONS: Crizotinib showed a clinical activity similar to that of tepotinib and capmatinib in patients with NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutations. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: UMIN000031623.

PAI-1 mediates acquired resistance to MET-targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Mechanisms underlying primary and acquired resistance to MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in managing non-small cell lung cancer remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the possible mechanisms acquired for crizotinib in MET-amplified lung carcinoma cell lines. Two MET-amplified lung cancer cell lines, EBC-1 and H1993, were established for acquired resistance to MET-TKI crizotinib and were functionally elucidated. Genomic and transcriptomic data were used to assess the factors contributing to the resistance mechanism, and the alterations hypothesized to confer resistance were validated. Multiple mechanisms underlie acquired resistance to crizotinib in MET-amplified lung cancer cell lines. In EBC-1-derived resistant cells, the overexpression of SERPINE1, the gene encoding plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), mediated the drug resistance mechanism. Crizotinib resistance was addressed by combination therapy with a PAI-1 inhibitor and PAI-1 knockdown. Another mechanism of resistance in different subline cells of EBC-1 was evaluated as epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition with the upregulation of antiapoptotic proteins. In H1993-derived resistant cells, MEK inhibitors could be a potential therapeutic strategy for overcoming resistance with downstream mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway activation. In this study, we revealed the different mechanisms of acquired resistance to the MET inhibitor crizotinib with potential therapeutic application in patients with MET-amplified lung carcinoma.

Clinical treatment patterns, molecular characteristics and survival outcomes of ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: A large multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring ROS1 rearrangements is a molecular subset that exhibits favorable responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment than chemotherapy. This study investigated real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes among patients with ROS1-rearranged advanced NSCLC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with ROS1-rearranged advanced NSCLC treated in four different hospitals in China from August 2018 to March 2022. The study analyzed gene fusion distribution, resistance patterns, and survival outcomes. RESULTS: ROS1 rearrangement occurs in 1.8 % (550/31,225) of our study cohort. CD74 was the most common ROS1 fusion partner, accounting for 45.8 %. Crizotinib was used in 73.9 % of patients in the first-line treatment, and an increased use of chemotherapy, ceritinib, and lorlatinib was seen in the second-line setting. Lung (43.2 %) and brain (27.6 %) were the most common sites of progression in first-line setting, while brain progression (39.2 %) was the most common site of progression in second-line. Median overall survival was 46 months (95 % confidence intervals: 39.6-52.4). First-line crizotinib use yielded significantly superior survival outcomes over chemotherapy in terms of progression-free (18.5 vs. 6.0; p < 0.001) and overall survival (49.8 vs. 37; p = 0.024). The choice of treatment in the latter line also had survival implications, wherein survival outcomes were better when first-line crizotinib was followed by sequential TKI therapy than first-line chemotherapy followed by TKI therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided insights into the real-world treatment, drug resistance patterns, and survival outcomes among patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. This information serves as a valuable reference for guiding the treatment of this molecular subset of NSCLC.

A multicenter, retrospective archive study of radiological and clinical features of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients and crizotinib efficacy.

To evaluate radiological and clinical features in metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase+ non-small cell lung cancer patients and crizotinib efficacy in different lines. This national, non-interventional, multicenter, retrospective archive screening study evaluated demographic, clinical, and radiological imaging features, and treatment approaches in patients treated between 2013-2017. Totally 367 patients (54.8% males, median age at diagnosis 54 years) were included. Of them, 45.4% were smokers, and 8.7% had a family history of lung cancer. On radiological findings, 55.9% of the tumors were located peripherally, 7.7% of the patients had cavitary lesions, and 42.9% presented with pleural effusion. Pleural effusion was higher in nonsmokers than in smokers (37.3% vs. 25.3%, P = .018). About 47.4% of cases developed distant metastases during treatment, most frequently to the brain (26.2%). Chemotherapy was the first line treatment in 55.0%. Objective response rate was 61.9% (complete response: 7.6%; partial response: 54.2%). The highest complete and partial response rates were observed in patients who received crizotinib as the 2nd line treatment. The median progression-free survival was 14 months (standard error: 1.4, 95% confidence interval: 11.2-16.8 months). Crizotinib treatment lines yielded similar progression-free survival (P = .078). The most frequent treatment-related adverse event was fatigue (14.7%). Adrenal gland metastasis was significantly higher in males and smokers, and pleural involvement and effusion were significantly higher in nonsmokers-a novel finding that has not been reported previously. The radiological and histological characteristics were consistent with the literature data, but several differences in clinical characteristics might be related to population characteristics.

The cost-effectiveness of iruplinalkib versus alectinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients in China.

Background: Iruplinalkib is a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with efficacy in patients with ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is independently developed by a Chinese pharmaceutical company. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of iruplinalkib versus alectinib in the Chinese healthcare setting. Methods: A partitioned survival model was developed to project the economic and health outcomes. Efficacy was derived using unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). Cost and utility values were obtained from the literature and experts' opinions. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were carried out to evaluate the model's robustness. Results: Treatment with iruplinalkib versus alectinib resulted in a gain of 0.843 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with incremental costs of $20,493.27, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $24,313.95/QALY. Parameters related to relative efficacy and drug costs were the main drivers of the model outcomes. From the PSA, iruplinalkib had a 90% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $37,863.56/QALY. Conclusion: Compared to alectinib, iruplinalkib is a cost-effective therapy for patients with ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced NSCLC.