The Effects and Risk Factors of Femoral Neck Shortening after Internal Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures.

Backgroud: Internal fixation has been established as a treatment of choice in relatively young patients with femoral neck fractures. Due to the characteristics of femoral neck anatomy and blood supply, complications such as malunion, nonunion, avascular necrosis, and femoral neck shortening can occur after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Unlike other complications such as avascular necrosis or nonunion, femoral neck shortening has not been relatively well studied. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and clinical outcomes of femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Methods: From June 2012 to July 2022, among 102 patients who underwent internal fixation of femoral neck fractures, 94 patients who met inclusion and exclusion criteria were retrospectively analyzed. Internal fixation of the femoral neck was done with cannulated compression screws or a femoral neck system. Patients were divided into 2 groups; femoral neck shortening (≥ 5 mm) and no shortening (< 5 mm) according to measurement on follow-up hip anteroposterior (AP) simple radiographs compared with postoperative hip AP simple radiographs. Demographic and radiographic data were compared between the 2 groups. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and a visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Results: Among 94 patients, femoral neck shortening was observed in 33 (35.1%). In chi-square test, Pauwels angle, Garden type III or IV (displacement), and cortical comminution were significantly correlated with neck shortening (p < 0.05). In the multifactorial logistic regression test, cortical comminution was significantly correlated with femoral neck shortening (p < 0.01). The shortening group showed significantly lower clinical scores in terms of mHHS and VAS (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The femoral neck shortening group showed significantly lower clinical scores of mHHS and VAS than the no-shortening group. The presence of cortical comminution in preoperative hip computed tomography is a risk factor of femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures.

Optimal sliding distance in femoral neck system for displaced femoral neck fractures: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Displaced femoral neck fractures frequently result in considerable patient morbidity, with complications such as postoperative femoral neck shortening occurring in up to 39.1% of cases. This shortening is associated with reduced hip function and mobility. The Femoral Neck System (FNS), which allows for controlled sliding to facilitate fracture reduction and healing, may mitigate these issues. However, the ideal sliding distance to balance fracture healing and minimize complications is not well defined. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 179 patients who underwent FNS fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures at our institution from September 2019 to September 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the intraoperative sliding distance allowed by the FNS: the Minimal Slide group (≤ 5 mm), the Moderate Slide group (> 5 to ≤ 10 mm), and the Extensive Slide group (> 10 to 20 mm). Primary outcomes included postoperative femoral neck shortening, the incidence of moderate to severe shortening, time to fracture union, and hip joint function as assessed by the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Parker Mobility Score. Secondary outcomes included complication rates such as implant cut-out, nonunion, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and the need for secondary surgery. RESULTS: The Extensive Slide group of moderate to severe shortening at 32.31%, which was 1.59-fold and 8.88-fold that of the Moderate Slide (20.34%) and Minimal Slide group's (3.64%), respectively (P < 0.01). The sliding predominantly occurred within the first three months postoperatively and had substantially ceased by six months. At one year postoperatively, the median shortening was 2.7 mm (IQR, 0.7 to 3.5 mm) for the Minimal Slide group, a value that was notably lower compared to the 3.2 mm (IQR, 2.4 to 4.6 mm) for the Moderate Slide group and the 3.5 mm (IQR, 1.3 to 8.1 mm) for the Extensive Slide group. The average time to achieve union was similar across all groups, with no significant differences. Functional outcomes, as assessed by the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Parker Mobility Score, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) demonstrated statistical significance, the Parker Mobility Score did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Restricting FNS slide to ≤ 5 mm in surgery may reduce shortening, improve hip function, and not hinder fracture healing or implant stability. Considering the key 3-month sliding timeline postoperatively is advisable in clinical practice. Further research with a broader patient cohort is vital to confirm these findings and to anchor them in evidence-based practice.

Mechanical analysis of modified femoral neck system in the treatment of osteoporotic femoral neck fractures.

BACKGROUND: Despite the explicit biomechanical advantages associated with FNS, it is currently inconclusive, based on the existing literature, whether Femoral Neck System (FNS) outperforms Cannulated cancellous screws (CSS) in all aspects. Due to variances in bone morphology and bone density between the elderly and young cohorts, additional research is warranted to ascertain whether the benefits of FNS remain applicable to elderly osteoporosis patients. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical properties of FNS in osteoporotic femoral neck fractures and propose optimization strategies including additional anti-rotation screw. METHODS: The Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture models were reconstructed using finite element numerical techniques. The CSS, FNS, and modified FNS (M-FNS) models were created based on features and parameterization. The various internal fixations were individually assembled with the assigned normal and osteoporotic models. In the static analysis mode, uniform stress loads were imposed on all models. The deformation and stress variations of the femur and internal fixation models were recorded. Simultaneously, descriptions of shear stress and strain energy were also incorporated into the figures. RESULTS: Following bone mass reduction, deformations in CSS, FNS, and M-FNS increased by 47%, 52%, and 40%, respectively. The equivalent stress increments for CSS, FNS, and M-FNS were 3%, 43%, 17%, respectively. Meanwhile, variations in strain energy and shear stress were observed. The strain energy increments for CSS, FNS, and M-FNS were 4%, 76%, and 5%, respectively. The shear stress increments for CSS, FNS, and M-FNS were 4%, 65% and 44%, respectively. Within the osteoporotic model, M-FNS demonstrated the lowest total displacement, shear stress, and strain energy. CONCLUSION: Modified FNS showed better stability in the osteoporotic model (OM). Using FNS alone may not exhibit immediate shear resistance advantages in OM. Concurrently, the addition of one anti-rotation screw can be regarded as a potential optimization choice, ensuring a harmonious alignment with the structural characteristics of FNS.

[Short-term effectiveness of robot-guided femoral neck system combined with cannulated compression screw fixation in treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients].

Objective: To investigate short-term effectiveness of robot-guided femoral neck system (FNS) combined with cannulated compression screw (CCS) fixation in treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients. Methods: A clinical data of 49 young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fractures, who met the selection criteria and admitted between January 2021 and June 2023, was retrospectively analyzed. After reduction of femoral neck fractures, 27 cases were treated with robot-guided FNS fixation (FNS group) and 22 cases with robot-guided FNS and CCS fixation (FNS+CCS group). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, cause of fracture, time from fracture to operation, fracture side, and classification (Garden classification and Pauwels classification) between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, the time when the patient began bearing weight, and hip joint pain and functional scores (VAS score and Harris score) at last follow-up for two groups were recorded. Imaging re-examination was taken to evaluate the quality of fracture reduction, fracture healing, as well as the occurrence of fracture non-union, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and femoral neck shortening. Results: All operations were successfully completed and the incisions healed by first intention. There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups ( P>0.05), and the intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency in FNS+CCS group significantly increased compared to FNS group ( P<0.05). All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14.1 months). Imaging re-examination showed that there was no significant difference in fracture reduction quality between the two groups ( P>0.05), but the fracture healing time was significantly shorter in FNS+CCS group than in FNS group, and weight-bearing began earlier ( P<0.05). The incidences of femoral neck shortening, fracture non-union, and osteonecrosis of the femoral head were lower in FNS+CCS group than in FNS group, and there was significant difference in the incidence of femoral neck shortening between groups ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups ( P>0.05). However, the Harris score was significantly higher in FNS+CCS group than in FNS group ( P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with FNS fixation alone, robot-guided FNS combined with CCS fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients has obvious advantages in terms of early weight bearing and fracture healing, improves fracture healing rate, effectively prevents postoperative complications, and can obtain good short-term effectiveness.

[Therapeutic effect of modified femoral neck osteotomy on the surgical treatment of ankylosing spondylitis with severe flexion deformity].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of modified femoral neck osteotomy (mFNO) in the surgical treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and severe spinal kyphosis combined with hip flexion contracture. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 61 AS patients (103 hips) with spinal kyphosis and hip flexion contracture who underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) from January 1, 2019 to November 15, 2023. Data on mFNO operation time, blood loss, preoperative and postoperative values of the angle of the trunk and lower limb (ATL), hip passive range of motion (ROM), visual analogue scale (VAS), and incidence of in-hospital complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using paired-samples t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study ultimately included 10 cases, 9 males and 1 female, with an average age of (41.30±9.03) years. These patients underwent surgery for a total of 52 times, including 19 hips both receiving mFNO and THA, and 14 times PSO. The average operation time for nine bilateral mFNO was (133.11±34.81) min, with blood loss of (433.33±187.10) mL. A unilateral mFNO took 60 min with 200 mL of blood loss. The preoperative ATL of 19 hips was 40.37°±13.66°, and the postoperative ATL value was 88.47°±12.46° (P < 0.05). The preoperative VAS score was 0, while the postoperative VAS score was 5.95±1.51 (P < 0.05). The preoperative hip extension ROM was 37.37°±18.13°, while the postoperative hip extension ROM was -4.95°±21.24° (P < 0.05). Hip flexion ROM improved from 37.37°±18.13° to 50.79°±20.36° after FNO (P < 0.05). There were three cases of in-hospital complications (3/52, 5.67%): One case of postoperative atelectasis following PSO (1/52, 1.92%), one greater trochanter fracture identified during THA (1/52, 1.92%), and one early dislocation post-THA (1/52, 1.92%). CONCLUSION: mFNO significantly improves the ATL in AS patients with severe spinal kyphosis combined with hip flexion contracture, facilitating PSO and THA surgeries.

Intraoperative estimation of natural femoral anteversion from proximal femoral osseous orientation during total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the relationship between the orientation of the osseous structure of the proximal femur encountered during total hip arthroplasty (THA) and preoperative femoral anteversion (FA). METHODS: Three-dimensional models were constructed using full-length lower extremity computed tomography images from a total of 80 participants. Femoral neck cutting was performed at heights of 5, 10, and 15 mm relative to the lesser trochanter. Following neck cutting, the angles formed by the anterior outer cortex and posterior outer cortex with the posterior condylar line (PCL) were defined as the anterior cortical angle (ACA) and posterior cortical angle (PCA), respectively. Univariate linear regression analysis was conducted using the remaining measurements with FA as the dependent variable. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 60.98 ± 10.82 years (males, 60.50 ± 11.36 years; females, 61.45 ± 10.37 years) (p = 0.697). All cortical angles and FA were larger in women compared to those in men. When comparing measurements by age groups, no statistically significant differences were observed. Univariate linear regression analysis with FA as the dependent variable showed statistical significance for all cortical angles. The adjusted R2 values were 0.711 (ACA5), 0.677 (ACA10), 0.572 (ACA15), 0.493 (PCA5), 0.574 (PCA10), and 0.446 (PCA15). CONCLUSION: Natural FA can be inferred from the anterior cortical angle (ACA) from femoral neck cutting plane observed during the THA procedure without preoperative images. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

Clinical perioperative outcomes in 39 cats after single session bilateral femoral head and neck excision.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the perioperative outcomes and complications of single session bilateral femoral head and neck excision (FHNE) in cats for treatment of bilateral coxofemoral joint disease. METHODS: The medical records of cats undergoing a single session bilateral FHNE were identified and the history, signalment, diagnosis, surgery reports, anesthetic records, postoperative radiographs, postoperative examinations, complications and outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 39 cats undergoing a single session bilateral FHNE were included. Bilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis was the most commonly diagnosed etiology. All cats were discharged within 48 h of the procedure. One major complication and five minor complications were reported. All but one cat returned to normal activity and no owners reported concerns after the 2-week postoperative recheck. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Single session bilateral FHNE is a viable surgical option for the treatment of bilateral coxofemoral disease in cats that results in a quick return to function, especially when other options are not indicated, available or affordable.

Comparative analysis of the femoral neck system (FNS) vs. cannulated cancellous screws (CCS) in the treatment of Middle-aged and elderly patients with femoral neck fractures: clinical outcomes and biomechanical insights.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and differences in biomechanical characteristics between the femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulated cancellous screws (CCSs) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. METHODS: This study retrospectively analysed a cohort of 38 registered cases of femoral neck fractures treated surgically with either the FNS (n = 17) or CCSs (n = 21) between January 2020 and December 2023. Indicators such as fluoroscopy frequency, length of hospital stay, and fracture healing time were compared between the two groups. Functional status was evaluated via the Harris hip score (HHS) and visual analogue scale (VAS), whereas prognosis was assessed based on changes in the neck shaft angle and femoral neck shortening. Additionally, six sets of femoral neck fracture models were developed based on Pauwels angles of 30°, 40°, 50°, 60°, 70°, and 80°. Two experimental groups, FNS and CCS, were established, and a joint reaction force of 1800 N was applied to the proximal femur. The displacement, stress, and stiffness of the components of interest in the different models were tested and compared. RESULTS: The distributions of all the baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). The FNS group presented significantly shorter fluoroscopy frequency, length of hospital stay, and fracture healing time (p < 0.05). Harris and VAS scores were higher in the FNS group than in the CCS group (p < 0.05). Postoperative changes in the neck shaft angle and femoral neck shortening were significantly lower in the FNS group than in the CCS group (p < 0.05). The results of the finite element analysis indicated that the maximum stress on the femoral head and varus angle were generally lower in the FNS group than in the CCS group and that the maximum displacement of the femoral head and FNS was generally lower in the FNS group than in the CCS group. However, the superiority of FNS over CCS decreased with increasing Pauwels angle. Additionally, the effectiveness of FNS in limiting displacement of the femoral neck upper wall was not as favourable as that of CCS. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of femoral neck fractures with FNS is superior and contributes to improved hip joint function. Biomechanical research has confirmed its structural stability and advantages in resisting femoral head varus. However, challenges to its fixation efficacy persist, particularly at higher Pauwels angles.

Screw Configuration Does Not Significantly Alter Neck Shortening After Valgus-Impacted Femoral Neck Fracture (OTA Type 31B1.1).

OBJECTIVES: To compare 3 different cancellous screw configurations used for Garden 1 femoral neck fractures (FNFs). DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: A large urban academic medical center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: All patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association 31B1.1 FNF who underwent in situ fixation with cancellous screws between 2012 and 2021 were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups: 2 screws placed in a parallel fashion, 3 screws placed in an inverted triangle configuration, and 3-screw fixation with placement of 1 "out-of-plane" screw perpendicular to the long axis of the femur. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Postoperative femoral neck shortening (mm) was the primary outcome, which was compared among the 3 groups of different screw configurations. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients with a median follow-up of 1 year (interquartile range 0.6-1.8 years) and an average age of 72 years (interquartile range 65.0-83.0 years) were included. All fractures demonstrated bony healing. Overall, 68.9% of the cohort had ≤2 mm of femoral neck shortening. There was no difference between groups in the proportion of patients who experienced greater than 2 mm of shortening (P = 0.839) or in the amount (mm) of femoral neck shortening (Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 0.517, P = 0.772). CONCLUSIONS: Although most patients with valgus-impacted FNF treated with screw fixation do not experience further femoral neck shortening, some patients demonstrated continued radiographic shortening during the healing process. The development of further femoral neck shortening and the amount of shortening that occurs do not differ based on implant configuration. Multiple different screw configurations seem to be acceptable for achieving healing and minimizing further femoral neck impaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Biomechanical comparison of femoral neck anti-rotation and support system versus femoral neck system for unstable pauwels III femoral neck fractures.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment method for managing unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of two types of Femoral Neck Anti-rotation and Support System (FNAS) and a Femoral Neck System (FNS) in unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures. METHODS: Eighteen synthetic femoral models were implanted with one of three fixation devices: FNS, FNAS I, or FNAS II. An unstable Pauwels III (OTA/AO 31-B2.3) femoral neck fracture was simulated using a custom-made needle and osteotomy guide. Torsion and axial compression loading tests were conducted, and the torque, torsion angle, load to failure, displacement, and stiffness values were recorded. RESULTS: FNAS II exhibited significantly higher torsional stiffness (0.67 ± 0.10 Nm/°) compared to FNAS I (0.52 ± 0.07 Nm/°, P = 0.01) and FNS (0.54 ± 0.07 Nm/°, P = 0.005). FNS demonstrated significantly greater mean axial stiffness (239.24 ± 11.38 N/mm) than both FNAS I (179.33 ± 31.11 N/mm, P = 0.005) and FNAS II (190.07 ± 34.11 N/mm, P = 0.022). FNAS I (302.37 ± 33.88 N/mm, P = 0.001) and FNAS II (319.59 ± 50.10 N/mm, P < 0.001) showed significantly higher initial axial stiffness compared to FNS (197.08 ± 33.68 N/mm). Both FNAS I and II improved resistance to deforming forces at a load level before approximately 1000 N, which is sufficient to withstand the load from most daily life activities. No significant differences were observed in compression failure load among the groups. The failure patterns at the point of failure included the pull-out of the distal locking screw and reverse oblique intertrochanteric femur fracture for FNS, while for FNAS I and II, the failures were characterized by a cleft on the calcar femorale and a decrease in the load-displacement curve. CONCLUSIONS: In unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures, the FNAS II enhances stability and is easier to manage for reoperation. The results of the current study support the potential of FNAS II as an alternative option for treating unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures in young individuals.

Preliminary clinical and radiological evaluation of osteosynthesis using the Femoral Neck System (FNS) for subcapital fractures of the femur.

Addressing subcapital fractures of the femur poses a substantial clinical challenge, complicated by the diverse range of available osteosynthesis materials. This study is dedicated to a comprehensive analysis of the clinical and radiological implications linked with the implementation of the Femoral Neck System (FNS) in osteosynthesis procedures. A descriptive study was conducted involving patients who underwent osteosynthesis for subcapital fractures of the femur utilizing the FNS during the period from 2019 to 2022. The investigation encompassed various facets, including the classification of fractures according to the Garden and Pauwells classifications, criteria for achieving precise reduction based on the Garden criteria and Tip Apex Distance (TAD). At the one-year follow-up, factors such as fracture consolidation, loss of reduction, fracture collapse, complications, and functional outcomes were evaluated utilizing the Harris Hip Score (HHS) scale. The study cohort included a total of 26 patients, among whom 22 exhibited non-displaced subcapital femur fractures categorized as Garden I and II. Successful reduction was accomplished in 23 cases, in which 24 cases (92.3%) displayed a TAD measurement below 25 mm. According to the HHS, patients achieved an average score of 90.9 (ranging from 63 to 100) following the surgical intervention, with predominantly "excellent" and "good" outcomes. The outcomes derived from our investigation corroborate the viability of the Femoral Neck System (FNS) as a reliable option for osteosynthesis in femoral neck fractures. The results obtained are comparable to those achieved with other available implants, as highlighted by previous studies.

A finite element analysis of a low-profile femoral neck system of screws in sleeves in a vertical femoral neck fracture model.

BACKGROUND: Femoral neck system (FNS) has exhibited some drawbacks, such as non-fit of the plate with the lateral femoral cortex, postoperative pain, and the potential risk of subtrochanteric fractures. We have developed a low-profile FNS system that addresses some compatibility issues in FNS. In this study, we conducted finite element analysis on the 1-hole FNS (1 H-FNS), 2-holes FNS (2 H-FNS), and low-profile FNS (LP-FNS) and compared their biomechanical performance. METHODS: After the mesh convergence analysis, we established three groups of 1 H-FNS, 2 H-FNS, and LP-FNS. The interfragmentary gap, sliding distance, shear stress, and compressive stress and the bone-implant interface compression stress, stiffness, and displacement were determined under the neutral, flexion, or extension conditions of the hip joint, respectively. The stress and displacement of the femur after the implant removal were also investigated. RESULTS: (1) There were no obvious differences among the three FNS groups in terms of the IFM distance. However, the LP-FNS group showed less rotational angle compared with conventional FNS (neutral: 1 H-FNS, -61.64%; 2 H-FNS, -45.40%). Also, the maximum bone-implant interface compression stress was obviously decreased under the neutral, flexion, or extension conditions of the hip joint (1 H-FNS: -6.47%, -20.59%, or -4.49%; 2 H-FNS: -3.11%, 16.70%, or -7.03%; respectively). (2) After the implant removal, there was no notable difference in the maximum displacement between the three groups, but the maximum von Mises stress displayed a notable difference between LP-FNS and 1 H-FNS groups (-15.27%) except for the difference between LP-FNS and 2 H-FNS groups (-4.57%). CONCLUSIONS: The LP-FNS may not only provide the same biomechanical stabilities as the 1 H-FNS and 2 H-FNS, but also have more advantages in rotational resistance especially under the neutral condition of the hip joint, in the bone-implant interface compression stress, and after the implant removal. In addition, the 1 H-FNS and 2 H-FNS have similar biomechanical stabilities except for the maximum von Mises stress after the implant removal. The femur after the LP-FNS removal not only is subjected to relatively little stress but also minimizes stress concentration areas.

Modified "SUPERhip2" to Reconstruct Postinfectious Femoral Neck Pseudoarthrosis (Hunka Type 3): A Case Report.

CASE: We report a case of a 3-year-old girl who developed a post-infectious femoral neck pseudoarthrosis after a proximal hematogenous femoral osteomyelitis (type 3 according to Hunka classification of the sequelae of the septic hip in children). The patient was treated by a modified "SUPERhip 2" procedure (a reconstructive procedure described to reconstruct congenital femoral neck pseudoarthrosis). This report describes the surgical technique in details and discusses the advantages, pitfalls, and complications and possible complications. CONCLUSION: Our modification simplifies the "SUPERhip 2" procedure. Postinfectious neck pseudoarthrosis was successfully treated, and we believe this modification is applicable for the treatment of congenital femoral neck pseudoarthrosis as well.

Clinical efficacy of Femoral Neck System for treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures in young adults.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the mid-term clinical efficacy of the Femoral Neck System (FNS) (DePuy Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland) in treating young patients with unstable Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational analysis of 21 young adults treated with the FNS. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on fracture reduction quality, Harris hip scores, and postoperative complication rates. RESULTS: The study comprised 21 patients with a mean age of 35 years (range, 20-50 years) who were followed for a mean duration of 22.8 months (range, 16-30 months). Closed reduction was unfeasible in three (14.3%) patients, each of whom required open reduction. Notable postoperative complications were avascular necrosis in two (9.5%) patients, nonunion in one (4.7%), and implant failure in one (4.7%). Each of these complications led to the requirement for total hip arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: The favorable mid-term clinical outcomes of this study indicate that the FNS is a potentially effective treatment modality for young individuals with unstable Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

Biomechanical changes in the proximal femur before and after removal of femoral neck system.

BACKGROUND: As an innovative internal fixation system, FNS (femoral neck system) is increasingly being utilized by surgeons for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. At present, there have been numerous finite element analysis experiments studying the immediate stability of FNS and CSS in treating femoral neck fractures. However, there is scarce mechanical analysis available regarding the effects post internal fixation removal. This study aimed to investigate the alterations in mechanical parameters of the proximal femur before and after the removal of FNS (femoral neck system), and to assess potential distinctions in indicators following the extraction of CSS (Cannulated Screws). METHODS: A proximal femur model was reconstructed using finite element numerical techniques. The models for CSS and FNS were formulated utilizing characteristics and parametric definitions. The internal fixation was combined with a normal proximal femur model to simulate the healing state after fracture surgery. Within the framework of static analysis, consistent stress burdens were applied across the entirety of the models. The total deformation and equivalent stress of the proximal femur were recorded before and after the removal of internal fixation. RESULTS: Under the standing condition, the total deformation of the model before and after removing CSS was 0.99 mm and 1.10 mm, respectively, indicating an increase of 12%. The total deformation of the model before and after removing FNS was 0.65 mm and 0.76 mm, respectively, indicating an increase of 17%. The equivalent stress for CSS and FNS were 55.21 MPa and 250.67 MPa, respectively. The average equivalent stress on the cross-section of the femoral neck before and after removal of CSS was 7.76 MPa and 6.11 MPa, respectively. The average equivalent stress on the cross-section of the femoral neck before and after removal of FNS was 9.89 MPa and 8.79 MPa, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The retention of internal fixation may contribute to improved stability of the proximal femur. However, there still existed risks of stress concentration in internal fixation and stress shielding in the proximal femur. Compared to CSS, the removal of FNS results in larger bone tunnels and insufficient model stability. Further clinical interventions are recommended to address this issue.

Contralateral Neck-shaft Angle Lower Than 130° Is Associated With Clinical Failure in Nongeriatric Individuals: Analysis of the National Femoral Neck Fracture Database of 1066 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients who are nongeriatric (≤ 60 years) is challenging because of high failure rates. Anatomic parameters influence the biomechanical environment for fracture healing, but their associations with clinical prognosis remains unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Which anatomic parameter that is identifiable on pelvic radiographs shows a statistical correlation with a higher risk of clinical failure defined as nonunion, avascular necrosis (AVN), reoperation, and functional failure (decrease in Harris hip score reaching the minimum clinically important difference) in the screw fixation of femoral neck fractures among nongeriatric patients? (2) How does the influence of anatomic parameters on clinical prognosis manifest: directly or mediated by additional mechanisms? METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study used a nationwide database in China. Between January 2014 and December 2020, we evaluated 1066 patients with femoral neck fractures with a median age of 53 years (interquartile range 46 to 56) and median follow-up period of 62 months. Anatomic parameters including femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA), femoral head radius, femoral neck width, femoral offset, acetabular center-edge angle, and acetabular sharp angle were variables of interest. The primary outcome was clinical failure including nonunion, AVN, reoperation, and functional failure (decrease in Harris hip score reaching the minimum clinically important difference). Risk factors for failure were first filtered using the Bayesian information criterion and then assessed with multiple regression adjusting for confounders. The mediation effect was further explored using model-based causal mediation analysis with a quasi-Bayesian Monte Carlo method. RESULTS: Of all anatomic parameters we assessed, the contralateral NSA was associated with clinical failure, after adjusting for all potential covariates and confounding variables (adjusted odds ratio 0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.89 to 0.95]; p < 0.001). The optimal threshold for the NSA was 130°, with the highest Youden index of 0.27. Patients with an NSA < 130° (41% [441 of 1066]) demonstrated an increased occurrence of nonunion (15% [68 of 441] versus 5% [33 of 625]; p < 0.001), AVN (32% [141 of 441] versus 22% [136 of 625]; p < 0.001), functional failure (25% [110 of 441] versus 15% [93 of 625]), and reoperations (28% [122 of 441] versus 13% [79 of 625]). The impact of an NSA less than 130° on clinical failure was direct and substantially mediated by the type of displaced fracture (mediation proportion: 18.7%). CONCLUSION: In our study of screw fixations for femoral neck fractures among nongeriatric patients, we identified that a contralateral NSA < 130° correlates with an increased risk of clinical failure including nonunion, AVN, functional failure, and reoperation. The effect is either direct or mediated through displaced fracture types. This is important for surgeons in order to recognize the elevated rate of clinical failure and nature of the challenging biomechanical environment, which should guide them in refining surgical details and selecting appropriate fixation and rehabilitation plans. Approaches to managing these fractures require further validation with large-scale clinical trials. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

Comparison of femoral neck shortening after femoral neck system and cannulated cancellous screw fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of femoral neck shortening between the femoral neck system (FNS) and the cannulated cancellous screws (CCS) for displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 225 patients aged 18-65 years with displaced femoral neck fracture were divided into two groups according to internal fixation: 135 patients in the FNS group and 90 patients in the CCS group. The length of hospital stay, duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, quality of reduction, extent of femoral neck shortening, incidence of femoral neck shortening, femoral neck shortening at each follow-up visit, Harris hip score (HHS), reoperation, and complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 28.2 (26.0, 31.2) months in the FNS group and 30.2 (26.3, 34.7) months in the CCS group. The follow-up time, age, sex distribution, body mass index (BMI), mechanism of injury, injured side, length of hospital stay, time from injury to surgery, and fracture classification were similar between the groups. Duration of surgery was longer in the FNS group (65.0 (55.0, 87.0) min versus 55.0 (50.0, 65.0) min, P<0.001); intraoperative blood loss was greater in the FNS group (50.0 (20.0, 60.0) ml versus 20.0 (10.0, 35.0) ml, P<0.001). Femoral neck shortening was 2.4 (1.0, 4.5) mm in the FNS group versus 0.6 (0.0, 2.6) mm in the CCS group at 1 month postoperatively (P<0.001); 3.7 (1.8, 6.4) mm in the FNS group versus 1.2 (0.6, 3.8) mm in the CCS group at 3 months (P<0.001); 4.1(2.4, 7.7) mm in the FNS group versus 2.3 (1.1, 4.4) mm in the CCS group at 6 months (P<0.001); 4.2 (2.6, 7.7) mm in the FNS group versus 2.6 (1.3, 4.6) mm in the CCS group at 12 months (P<0.001); and 4.5 (2.8, 8.0) mm in the FNS group versus 2.8 (1.5, 4.8) mm in the CCS group at 18 months (P<0.001). The two groups showed no significant differences in HHS, reoperation, and reduction quality. CONCLUSION: Compared to CCS, FNS is deficient in preventing femoral neck shortening. Future research should focus on improving FNS in terms of preventing femoral neck shortening.

Do all short stem types restore biomechanical parameters of the hip? Comparison according to femoral neck osteotomy levels.

PURPOSE: There is no consensus on ideal short femoral stem design. A classification system proposed by Feyen and Shimmin divides short stems in two types according to femoral neck osteotomy levels: subcapital (IIIA) and standard (IIIB). The study aims to determine which design type is more successful in restoring native biomechanical parameters and whether stem type has an impact on clinical results. METHODS: In this retrospective comparative study, patients that have undergone short stem hip arthroplasty were evaluated according to stem types: type IIIA (n = 52, 66.7%) (Mathys Optimys) and IIIB (n = 26, 33.3%) (Implantcast Aida and Smith & Nephew SMF). Pelvis X-rays were assessed in terms of femoral neck length, horizontal and vertical hip centres of rotation, horizontal and vertical femoral offsets, abductor lever arm lengths, leg lengths, and stem-shaft angles. Improvement in Harris hip scores, differences between post-operative and pre-operative measurements, and stem-shaft angles were evaluated and compared between two groups. RESULTS: Mean femoral neck resection (8.27 ± 6.68 mm in IIIA and 15 ± 6.33 mm in IIIB) was significantly different between both groups (p < 0.001). Harris hip scores were increased at post-operative six months in both groups with no difference (84.4 ± 6.4 and 84.6 ± 5.5, p = 0.4). The absolute values of differences between pre-operative and post-operative horizontal centres of rotation (p = 0.63), vertical centers of rotation (p = 0.75), horizontal femoral offsets (p = 0.78), vertical femoral offsets (p = 0.83), abductor lever arm distances (p = 0.63), and leg length (p = 0.21) measurements were not different between both groups. Stem positions were both varus with no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: We found no difference regarding restoration of biomechanical parameters between short stem designs with different levels of neck osteotomy. Additionally, short stem can mostly result in varus component positioning regardless of the level of neck osteotomy.

Comparative Short-Term Outcomes of Femoral Neck System (FNS) and Cannulated Screw Fixation in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Multicenter Study.

Background: Femoral neck fractures need to be treated in their early stages with accurate reduction and stable fixation to reduce complications. The authors compared the early radiologic outcomes of femoral neck fractures treated with the recently introduced Femoral Neck System (FNS, Depuy-Synthes) with conventional cannulated screws (CS) in a multicenter design. Furthermore, the factors associated with early failure after FNS were analyzed. Methods: The FNS group included 40 patients treated between June 2019 and January 2020, and the CS group included 65 patients treated between January 2015 and May 2019. The operation was performed in 3 university hospitals. Patient demographics, fracture classification, postoperative reduction quality, sliding distance of FNS or CS, union and time to union, and complication rates were examined. Logistic regression analysis was performed on candidate factors for early failure of the FNS group. Results: The FNS group had a 90% union rate and a mean time to union of 4.4 months, while the CS group had similar results with an 83.1% union rate and a mean time to union of 5.1 months. In the subgroup analysis of Pauwels type III fractures, the union rates were 75.0% and 58.8% in the FNS and CS groups, respectively, and the time to union was significantly shorter in the FNS group with 4.8 months compared to 6.8 months in the CS group. Early failure rate within 6 months of FNS fixation was observed to be 10%, which included 3 reduction failures and 1 excessive sliding with a broken implant. Risk factors for early failure after FNS were identified as displaced fractures (Garden classification type III or IV), poor reduction quality, longer tip-apex distance, greater sliding distance, and 1-hole implants, of which sliding distance was the only significant risk factor in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In femoral neck fractures, FNS and CS did not show significant differences for short-term radiologic results. FNS resulted in shorter operative time than cannulated screw fixation and favorable outcomes in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. The FNS could be considered a reliable and safe alternative to CS when treating femoral neck fractures.

Bilateral Femoral Neck Pseudarthrosis in an Adolescent Girl With Congenital Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia. The Treatment Journey: A Case Report.

CASE: We describe the surgical management of a girl with dwarfism and congenital spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, who presented in adolescence with coxa vara and bilateral pseudarthrosis between the femoral neck and the diaphysis, with asymmetric distal migration at both sites and leg length discrepancy. The patient at 16 years underwent valgus osteotomy in situ and femoral neck fixation in the left hip. The right hip was operated 19 months later. CONCLUSION: Hip dysplasia is common in spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, but a debilitating nontraumatic bilateral pseudarthrosis at the base of the femoral neck has not been previously reported. Valgus corrective osteotomies of the femur in situ led to union and allowed the patient to walk.