RESUMEN
Despite many advances in medical education, medical students continue to mostly shadow on inpatient rotations like Neurology. They seldom receive face-to-face feedback or mentorship from attending physicians. This results from not training attending physicians how to integrate medical students into clinical activities in a way that does not detract from patient rounds. The 'active feedback program' is a framework for inpatient rotations that immerses medical students in clinical activities with the attending physician providing mentorship and feedback that emphasizes brevity. Expectations are laid out early. Students pick up 2-3 patients, performing daily oral reports and focused neurological exams with immediate feedback. Feedback includes items to not only correct the treatment plan, but also improve the student's oral presentation and neurological exam skills. Students also receive formal individual feedback twice during the rotation that includes constructive criticism and specific task-oriented praise. The active feedback program awaits formal testing, but seems to result in medical students learning at an accelerated rate. Neurology residents also appear to benefit by learning from critiques of the medical students and taking on higher level responsibilities. Patient rounds move quickly, leaving time for the attending physician to keep up with other obligations. As academic Neurologists we have a duty to transfer our skills to the next generation of physicians. If proven in future studies, wide adoption of the active feedback program will allow us to finally move medical students out of the shadows and come closer to achieving this noble goal.
Asunto(s)
Retroalimentación Formativa , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Rondas de Enseñanza/organización & administración , Competencia Clínica , Educación Médica , Humanos , Tutoría/organización & administración , MotivaciónAsunto(s)
Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/educación , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Ansiedad/etiología , Depresión/etiología , Humanos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/psicología , Salud Mental , Administración de Personal en HospitalesRESUMEN
Introduced in 2017, the reform of the 3rd cycle has modified the organization of the residency in all specialties, and in particular radiation oncology. The residency was thus divided into 3 phases with increasing knowledge and responsibilities. The latter, carried out under the status of "junior doctor", created and defined by decree n°2018-571 of July 3, 2018 and the decree of January 16, 2020, is a phase of supervised autonomy of the resident. Radiotherapy is a singular specialty, with multiple and complex activities, and requires multiple skills. A guide defining the status of the "Junior Doctor" in radiation oncology therefore appears necessary, defining each resident's role and obligations. This guide is of an advisory nature and must be adapted to the particularities of each department. This guide aims to help the implementation of the reform of the 3rd cycle in radiation oncology and especially the final year called the consolidation phase. It is destined to evolve, expanded by individual and collective feedback and the constant renewal of our speciality.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Oncología por Radiación/organización & administración , Francia , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Oncología por Radiación/educación , Oncología por Radiación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Dosificación RadioterapéuticaRESUMEN
PROBLEM: In accordance with guidelines from the Association of American Medical Colleges, medical schools across the United States suspended clerkships and transitioned preclinical courses online in March 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Hospitals and health systems faced significant burdens during this time, particularly in New York City. APPROACH: Third- and fourth-year medical students at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai formed the COVID-19 Student WorkForce to connect students to essential roles in the Mount Sinai Hospital System and support physicians, staff members, researchers, and hospital operations. With the administration's support, the WorkForce grew to include over 530 medical and graduate students. A methodology was developed for clinical students to receive elective credit for these volunteer activities. OUTCOMES: From March 15, 2020, to June 14, 2020, student volunteers recorded 29,602 hours (2,277 hours per week) in 7 different task forces, which operated at 7 different hospitals throughout the health system. Volunteers included students from all years of medical school as well as PhD, master's, and nursing students. The autonomous structure of the COVID-19 Student WorkForce was unique and contributed to its ability to quickly mobilize students to necessary tasks. The group leaders collaborated with other medical schools in the New York City area, sharing best practices and resources and consulting on a variety of topics. NEXT STEPS: Going forward, the COVID-19 Student WorkForce will continue to collaborate with student leaders of other institutions and prevent volunteer burnout; transition select initiatives into structured, precepted student roles for clinical education; and maintain a state of readiness in the event of a second surge of COVID-19 infections in the New York City area.
Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional/prevención & control , COVID-19/prevención & control , Defensa Civil/organización & administración , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos Humanos/organización & administración , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , Prácticas Clínicas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prácticas Clínicas/métodos , Educación a Distancia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Educación a Distancia/métodos , Guías como Asunto , Recursos en Salud , Hospitales , Humanos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Facultades de Medicina/organización & administración , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , VoluntariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient-centered care (PCC) is a core component of quality care and its measurement is fundamental for research and improvement efforts. However, an inventory of surveys for measuring PCC in hospitals, a core care setting, is not available. OBJECTIVE: To identify surveys for assessing PCC in hospitals, assess PCC dimensions that they capture, report their psychometric properties, and evaluate applicability to individual and/or dyadic (eg, mother-infant pairs in pregnancy) patients. RESEARCH DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of articles published before January 2019 available on PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO Host and references of extracted papers to identify surveys used to measure "patient-centered care" or "family-centered care." Surveys used in hospitals and capturing at least 3 dimensions of PCC, as articulated by the Picker Institute, were included and reviewed in full. Surveys' descriptions, subscales, PCC dimensions, psychometric properties, and applicability to individual and dyadic patients were assessed. RESULTS: Thirteen of 614 articles met inclusion criteria. Nine surveys were identified, which were designed to obtain assessments from patients/families (n=5), hospital staff (n=2), and both patients/families and hospital staff (n=2). No survey captured all 8 Picker dimensions of PCC [median=6 (range, 5-7)]. Psychometric properties were reported infrequently. All surveys applied to individual patients, none to dyadic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple surveys for measuring PCC in hospitals are available. Opportunities exist to improve survey comprehensiveness regarding dimensions of PCC, reporting of psychometric properties, and development of measures to capture PCC for dyadic patients.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales/normas , Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the province of Brescia (Italy) had a significant number of COVID-19 cases, which led to a subversion of the ordinary structure of the university hospital ASST Spedali Civili, driven by the need to hospitalize as many patients as possible in a narrow period of time. At the peak of the epidemic, a rapid hospitalization discharge area, the Discharge Ward (DW), was set up with the aim of facilitating the rapid turnover of patients in the wards where the most severe patients had to be hospitalized. The organization and activities carried out are described in the results of this reproducible experience during epidemic events.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Alta del Paciente , SARS-CoV-2 , Recursos Humanos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ocupación de Camas/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/mortalidad , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Unidades Hospitalarias/organización & administración , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/organización & administración , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Overnight physician staffing in the ICU has been recommended by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the Leapfrog Consortium. We conducted a survey to review practice in the current era and to compare this with results from a 2006 survey. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Canadian adult ICUs. PARTICIPANTS: ICU directors. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: A 29-question survey was sent to ICU directors describing overnight staffing by residents, fellows, nurse practitioners, and staff physicians, as well as duty duration, clinical responsibilities, and unit characteristics. We established contact with 122 ICU directors, of whom 107 (88%) responded. Of the 107 units, 60 (56%) had overnight in-house physicians. Compared with ICUs without overnight in-house physician coverage, ICUs with in-house physicians were in larger hospitals (p < 0.0001), had more beds (p < 0.0001), had more ventilated patients (p < 0.0001), and had more admissions (p < 0.0001). Overnight in-house physicians were first year residents (R1) in 20 of 60 (33%), second to fifth year residents (R2-R5) in 46 of 60 (77%), and Critical Care Medicine trainees in 19 of 60 (32%). Advanced practice nurses provided overnight coverage in four of 107 ICUs (4%). The most senior in-house physician was a staff physician in 12 of 60 ICUs (20%), a Critical Care Medicine trainee in 14 of 60 (23%), and a resident (R2-R5) in 20 of 60 (33%). The duration of overnight duty was on average 20-24 hours in 22 of 46 units (48%) with R2-R5 residents and 14 of 19 units (74%) covered by Critical Care Medicine trainees. CONCLUSIONS: Variability of in-house overnight physician presence in Canadian adult ICUs is linked to therapeutic complexity and unit characteristics and has not changed significantly over the decade since our 2006 survey. Additional evidence about patient and resident outcomes would better inform decisions to revise physician scheduling in Canadian ICUs.
Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Canadá , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión y Programación de Personal/organización & administración , Admisión y Programación de Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosAsunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Dermatología/educación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Recursos Humanos/organización & administración , Actitud del Personal de Salud , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Masculino , Innovación Organizacional , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Objective A pilot study to: (1) describe the ability of emergency physicians to provide primary consults at an Australian, major metropolitan, adult emergency department (ED) during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared with historical performance; and (2) to identify the effect of system and process factors on productivity. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional description of shifts worked between 1 and 29 February 2020, while physicians were carrying out their usual supervision, flow and problem-solving duties, as well as undertaking additional COVID-19 preparation, was documented. Effect of supervisory load, years of Australian registration and departmental flow factors were evaluated. Descriptive statistical methods were used and regression analyses were performed. Results A total of 188 shifts were analysed. Productivity was 4.07 patients per 9.5-h shift (95% CI 3.56-4.58) or 0.43 patients per h, representing a 48.5% reduction from previously published data (P<0.0001). Working in a shift outside of the resuscitation area or working a day shift was associated with a reduction in individual patient load. There was a 2.2% (95% CI: 1.1-3.4, P<0.001) decrease in productivity with each year after obtaining Australian medical registration. There was a 10.6% (95% CI: 5.4-15.6, P<0.001) decrease in productivity for each junior physician supervised. Bed access had no statistically significant effect on productivity. Conclusions Emergency physicians undertake multiple duties. Their ability to manage their own patients varies depending on multiple ED operational factors, particularly their supervisory load. COVID-19 preparations reduced their ability to see their own patients by half. What is known about the topic? An understanding of emergency physician productivity is essential in planning clinical operations. Medical productivity, however, is challenging to define, and is controversial to measure. Although baseline data exist, few studies examine the effect of patient flow and supervision requirements on the emergency physician's ability to perform primary consults. No studies describe these metrics during COVID-19. What does this paper add? This pilot study provides a novel cross-sectional description of the effect of COVID-19 preparations on the ability of emergency physicians to provide direct patient care. It also examines the effect of selected system and process factors in a physician's ability to complete primary consults. What are the implications for practitioners? When managing an emergency medical workforce, the contribution of emergency physicians to the number of patients requiring consults should take into account the high volume of alternative duties required. Increasing alternative duties can decrease primary provider tasks that can be completed. COVID-19 pandemic preparation has significantly reduced the ability of emergency physicians to manage their own patients.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Eficiencia Organizacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Citas y Horarios , Australia , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Predicción , Humanos , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Background and purpose - The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted healthcare services around the world. We (1) describe the organizational changes at a level 1 trauma center, (2) investigate how orthopedic healthcare professionals perceived the immense amount of information and educational activities, and (3) make recommendations on how an organization can prepare for disruptive situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic in the future. Methods - We conducted a retrospective survey on the organizational restructuring of the orthopedic department and the learning outcomes of a needs-driven educational program. The educational activities were evaluated by a non-validated, 7-item questionnaire. Results - The hospital established 5 COVID-19 clusters, which were planned to be activated in sequential order. The orthopedic ward comprised cluster 4, where orthopedic nursing staff were teamed up with internal medicine physicians, while the orthopedic team were redistributed to manage minor and major injuries in the emergency department (ED). The mean learning outcome of the educational activities was high-very high, i.e., 5.4 (SD 0.7; 7-point Likert scale). Consequently, the staff felt more confident to protect themselves and to treat COVID-19 patients. Interpretation - Using core clinical competencies of the staff, i.e., redistribution of the orthopedic team to the ED, while ED physicians could use their competencies treating COVID-19 patients, may be applicable in other centers. In-situ simulation is an efficient tool to enhance non-technical and technical skills and to facilitate organizational learning in regard to complying with unforeseen changes.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Atención a la Salud , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Innovación Organizacional , Ortopedia/tendencias , Centros Traumatológicos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2 , Desarrollo de Personal/métodos , Desarrollo de Personal/tendencias , Centros Traumatológicos/organización & administración , Centros Traumatológicos/tendenciasAsunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/terapia , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Equipo de Protección Personal/provisión & distribución , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Personal de Salud/organización & administración , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Australia , Eficiencia Organizacional , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Consulta Remota , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic epicenter in Bronx, NY, the Montefiore Neuroscience Center required rapid and drastic changes when considering the delivery of neurologic care, health and safety of staff, and continued education and safety for house staff. Health care leaders rely on principles that can be in conflict during a disaster response such as this pandemic, with equal commitments to ensure the best care for those stricken with COVID-19, provide high-quality care and advocacy for patients and families coping with neurologic disease, and advocate for the health and safety of health care teams, particularly house staff and colleagues who are most vulnerable. In our attempt to balance these principles, over 3 weeks, we reformatted our inpatient neuroscience services by reducing from 4 wards to just 1, in the following weeks delivering care to over 600 hospitalized patients with neuro-COVID and over 1,742 total neuroscience hospital bed days. This description from members of our leadership team provides an on-the-ground account of our effort to respond nimbly to a complex and evolving surge of patients with COVID in a large urban hospital network. Our efforts were based on (1) strategies to mitigate exposure and transmission, (2) protection of the health and safety of staff, (3) alleviation of logistical delays and strains in the system, and (4) facilitating coordinated communication. Each center's experience will add to knowledge of best practices, and emerging research will help us gain insights into an evidence-based approach to neurologic care during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Departamentos de Hospitales/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Neurología/organización & administración , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Atención Ambulatoria , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Comunicación , Atención a la Salud , Unidades Hospitalarias/organización & administración , Hospitalización , Humanos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Neurología/educación , Enfermería en Neurociencias , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/organización & administración , Equipo de Protección Personal , Admisión y Programación de Personal , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina , Envío de Mensajes de TextoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As the COVID-19 pandemic sweeps across the world, healthcare departments must adapt to meet the challenges of service provision and staff/patient protection. Unlike elective surgery, acute care surgery (ACS) workloads cannot be artificially reduced providing a unique challenge for administrators to balance healthcare resources between the COVID-19 surge and regular patient admissions. METHODS: An enhanced ACS (eACS) model of care is described with the aim of limiting COVID-19 healthcare worker and patient cross-infection as well as providing 24/7 management of emergency general surgical (GS) and trauma patients. The eACS service comprised 5 independent teams covering a rolling 1:5 24-hr call. Attempts to completely separate eACS teams and patients from the elective side were made. The service was compared to the existing ACS service in terms of clinical and efficiency outcomes. Finally, a survey of staff attitudes towards these changes, concerns regarding COVID-19 and psychological well-being was assessed. RESULTS: There were no staff/patient COVID-19 cross-infections. Compared to the ACS service, eACS patients had reduced overall length of stay (2-days), time spent in the Emergency Room (46 min) and time from surgery to discharge (2.4-hours). The eACS model of care saved financial resources and bed-days for the organisation. The changes were well received by team-members who also felt that their safety was prioritised. CONCLUSION: In healthcare systems not overwhelmed by COVID-19, an eACS model may assist in preserving psychological well-being for healthcare staff whilst providing 24/7 care for emergency GS and trauma patients.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/organización & administración , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Adulto , Anciano , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Flujo de TrabajoRESUMEN
Reducing severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections among healthcare workers is critical. We ran Monte Carlo simulations modeling the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in non-COVID-19 wards, and we found that longer nursing shifts and scheduling designs in which teams of nurses and doctors co-rotate no more frequently than every 3 days can lead to fewer infections.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/organización & administración , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Administración de la Seguridad/normas , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Connecticut/epidemiología , Humanos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Innovación Organizacional , Admisión y Programación de Personal/organización & administración , Admisión y Programación de Personal/normas , Admisión y Programación de Personal/tendencias , SARS-CoV-2 , Administración de la Seguridad/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Recent reports identify that among hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 patients, 30% require ICU care. Understanding ICU resource needs remains an essential component of meeting current and projected needs of critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients. OBJECTIVES: This study queried U.S. ICU clinician perspectives on challenging aspects of care in managing coronavirus disease 2019 patients, current and anticipated resource demands, and personal stress. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using a descriptive survey methodology, an anonymous web-based survey was administered from April 7, 2020, to April 22, 2020 (email and newsletter) to query members of U.S. national critical care organizations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Through a 16-item descriptive questionnaire, ICU clinician perceptions were assessed regarding current and emerging critical ICU needs in managing the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infected patients, resource levels, concerns about being exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and perceived level of personal stress. A total of 9,120 ICU clinicians responded to the survey, representing all 50 U.S. states, with 4,106 (56.9%) working in states with 20,000 or more coronavirus disease 2019 cases. The 7,317 respondents who indicated their profession included ICU nurses (n = 6,731, 91.3%), advanced practice providers (nurse practitioners and physician assistants; n = 334, 4.5%), physicians (n = 212, 2.9%), respiratory therapists (n = 31, 0.4%), and pharmacists (n = 30, 0.4%). A majority (n = 6,510, 88%) reported having cared for a patient with presumed or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019. The most critical ICU needs identified were personal protective equipment, specifically N95 respirator availability, and ICU staffing. Minimizing healthcare worker virus exposure during care was believed to be the most challenging aspect of coronavirus disease 2019 patient care (n = 2,323, 30.9%). Nurses report a high level of concern about exposing family members to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (median score of 10 on 0-10 scale). Similarly, the level of concern reached the maximum score of 10 in ICU clinicians who had provided care to coronavirus disease 2019 patients. CONCLUSIONS: This national ICU clinician survey identifies continued concerns regarding personal protective equipment supplies with the chief issue being N95 respirator availability. As the pandemic continues, ICU clinicians anticipate a number of limited resources that may impact ICU care including personnel, capacity, and surge potential, as well as staff and subsequent family members exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. These persistent concerns greatly magnify personal stress, offering a therapeutic target for professional organization and facility intervention efforts.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/terapia , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/diagnóstico , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/mortalidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/organización & administración , COVID-19 , China/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Quirófanos/organización & administración , Quirófanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Carga de TrabajoRESUMEN
Confronted with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, New York City Health + Hospitals, the city's public health care system, rapidly expanded capacity across its eleven acute care hospitals and three new field hospitals. To meet the unprecedented demand for patient care, NYC Health + Hospitals redeployed staff to the areas of greatest need and redesigned recruiting, onboarding, and training processes. The hospital system engaged private staffing agencies, partnered with the Department of Defense, and recruited volunteers throughout the country. A centralized onboarding team created a single-source portal for medical care providers requiring credentialing and established new staff positions to increase efficiency. Using new educational tools focused on COVID-19 content, the hospital system trained twenty thousand staff members, including nearly nine thousand nurses, within a two-month period. Creation of multidisciplinary teams, frequent enterprisewide communication, willingness to shift direction in response to changing needs, and innovative use of technology were the key factors that enabled the hospital system to meet its goals.