An unusual cause of hemolacria: retained contact lens in upper fornix.

A 64-year-old male was referred for complaints of blood in tears and bloody discharge of unknown cause in the left eye. The patient was a chronic bandage contact lens (BCL) user. He had no history of recent trauma. A blood-stained BCL was present on the cornea in the left eye, which was removed. The ocular surface was dry with vascularization of the cornea. Double eversion of the upper eyelid with a Desmarre's retractor revealed a pyogenic granuloma with large papillae on the forniceal conjunctiva and a folded BCL hidden in the fornix. The folded BCL was carefully removed from the "upper fornix trap" and topical steroid eyedrops were prescribed.

Demystifying the role of magnetic resonance in identifying intraocular foreign bodies: a case of ocular siderosis.

BACKGROUND: Ocular siderosis (OS) is a significant cause of visual loss due to retained ferrous intraocular foreign bodies (IOFB). Despite its rarity, OS can lead to severe visual impairment if not promptly diagnosed and treated. This case is notable due to the occult nature of the IOFB, which was undetected by standard imaging modalities, emphasizing the critical role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in such scenarios. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old Caucasian male presented with progressive vision loss in his right eye over 20 days. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/1000 in the right eye and 20/20 in the left eye. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was 9 mmHg in both eyes. Slit-lamp examination revealed a small linear corneal wound and an iris defect in the right eye, along with a cataract featuring brownish deposits on the anterior capsule. The left eye was normal. Fundus examination of the right eye was hindered by media opacities. Ultrasonography showed a flat retina and choroid with no detectable IOFB. Despite a strong clinical suspicion of OS, computed tomography (CT) did not detect any IOFB. MRI subsequently identified an artifact in the inferior sectors of the right eye, indicative of a metallic IOFB. Surgical intervention involved a 23-gauge vitrectomy, phacoemulsification, IOFB removal and silicon oil (SO) tamponade resulting in a fully restored VA of 20/20 and normal IOP one month post-operation. SO was removed 2 months later. The retina remained adherent with no PVR development, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans showed a normal macula. CONCLUSIONS: This case underscores the importance of considering OS in patients with unexplained vision loss and history of ocular trauma, even when initial imaging fails to detect an IOFB. MRI proved crucial in identifying the IOFB, highlighting its value in the diagnostic process. Early detection and surgical removal of IOFBs are essential to prevent irreversible visual damage. This case demonstrates that MRI should be employed when CT and ultrasonography are inconclusive, ensuring accurate diagnosis and timely intervention to preserve vision.

A case of prolonged corneal sulfur foreign bodies and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: This case mainly describes a relatively rare case of an old mineral-like corneal foreign body that existed for up to 20 years, and did not significantly affect the visual quality of the patient. CASE PRESENTATION: A 56-year-old male miner complained of right eye vision loss for 3 years, swollen and painful for 4 months. Admission examination: Best corrected visual acuity was no light perception in the right eye and 20/20 in the left eye. Anterior segment examination: A large number of spot-like grayish-brown mineral foreign bodies in the conjunctiva of the nasal conjunctiva, emulsified silicone oil floating in the anterior chamber, Corneal foreign bodies in the right eye were widely distributed in the upper cortex and the proelastic layer. There were fewer foreign bodies in the left cornea. Previous medical history, 20 years ago due to forging and burning sulphur mine explosion, resulting in a large number of ore foreign bodies in the conjunctiva of both eyes. As these corneal foreign bodies did not affect the visual quality of the patient, we adopted a conservative treatment plan, did not remove these foreign bodies, and only carried out symptomatic treatment for the patient's secondary ocular hypertension. The patient was followed up normally in the outpatient department, and no cornea-related complications occurred up to now. CONCLUSIONS: First of all, it is necessary to understand the source and nature of the foreign body in patients with corneal and conjunctival foreign body injuries. In the second, for the old corneal metal foreign body, when the patient's visual acuity is stable and there are no symptoms of corneal irritation and inflammatory reaction, it can be Conservative treatment or outpatient follow-up observation. In the end, corneal Optical coherence tomography imaging should not be ignored, which is very important for determining the depth of embedding and the location of the corneal foreign body.

Bifid Pupil Iridodialysis Secondary to Airsoft Gun Injury.

This case report describes a diagnosis of iridodialysis in an 11-year-old boy who presented with decreased vision and inflammation after direct blunt trauma to the left eye.

Report of endophthalmitis caused by Paradictyoarthrinium diffractum after plant trauma: A case involving left enucleation.

During outdoor work in April 2022, a 48-year-old man was stabbed by a tree branch and underwent intraocular foreign body extraction and repair of the scleral wound with sutures and amniotic membrane graft at a local hospital. Steroid therapy with prednisone was prescribed after a diagnosis of uveitis. Vitrectomy was performed in June 2023; a fungal culture was positive, and ITS sequencing identified the organism as Paradictyoarthrinium diffractum. Empiric antifungal therapy did not have an effect, and, because of deterioration of the condition, the left eye was enucleated in October 2023. P. diffractum is a mangrove host-specific saprophytic fungus that has not been reported in humans.

Management and Clinical Outcomes of Eyes With Posterior Segment Intraocular Foreign Bodies Seen at a Tertiary Referral Center.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors regarding the visual and anatomic outcomes of eyes with posterior segment intraocular foreign body (PS-IOFB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 95 patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy and PS-IOFB removal between 2004 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on anatomical and visual outcomes, as well as preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 31.9 ± 12.3 years. The mean follow-up time was 21.9 ± 28.3 months. The median time interval from trauma to IOFB removal was 9 days. In univariate analysis, there was a positive correlation between initial visual acuity (VA) and final VA (P < 0.001). A higher ocular trauma score (OTS) was significantly associated with both anatomical and functional success (P < 0.001). Linear regression analysis showed that OTS was not superior to initial VA in predicting final VA (r = 0.625 vs r = -0.601). Anatomic and functional outcomes were not affected by the injury site, nature of PS-IOFB, or timing of PS-IOFB removal (P > 0.05 for all). Subretinal IOFB location, the need for silicone oil tamponade, and endophthalmitis (P = 0.005, P < 0.001, P = 0.044, respectively) were risk factors for poor visual outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The initial VA, the extent of the initial ocular damage, and the presence of endophthalmitis are important prognostic factors for functional success. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:434-442.].

Enlarging Orbital Rim Mass Due to Old Pencil Injury.

A 54-year-old female noticed a 2-month history of an enlarging left inferomedial orbital rim mass. The patient remembered a pencil injury at approximately 7 years of age. Her complete ophthalmic examination was otherwise unremarkable. She underwent CT orbital imaging, demonstrating a centrally hyperdense lesion along the left inferomedial orbital rim. There was no involvement of the nasolacrimal duct system. The patient underwent an excisional biopsy. The pathology disclosed noncaseating granulomatous inflammation to particulate black material consistent with graphite.

Intraocular foreign bodies in children: A retrospective case series.

INTRODUCTION: Open globe injuries are a major cause of visual impairment in children, related to the severity of the trauma or secondary to induced amblyopia. Intraocular foreign bodies (IOFB) have been reported in approximately one third of cases of open globe injuries. As clinical presentation and management may differ between adults and children, data is lacking about IOFBs in children under 18years of age. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical characteristics and visual prognosis of ocular trauma associated with intraocular foreign bodies in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included patients under 18years of age treated for ocular trauma with IOFB. Demographic characteristics, complete initial and final ophthalmological examination, imaging data and details of medical and surgical management were collected. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included (78.6% boys), with a mean age of 10.3years (min 7months-max 17years). In 92.9% of cases, patients were found to have a single IOFB, mostly metallic (71.4%). Posterior segment IOFBs were found in 50% of cases, anterior segment IOFBs in 28.6% and orbital IOFBs in 21.4%. The clinical examination permitted detection of the IOFBs in 50% of cases, while they were visible on CT scan in all cases. The mean initial visual acuity was 20/320, and the mean final visual acuity was 20/125. Endophthalmitis occurred in 2 cases (14%). DISCUSSION: Open globe injuries associated with IOFB are severe and sight-threatening. Localization of the IOFB in the posterior segment has a worse prognosis. CT scan is mandatory, especially in children, as the trauma history is often missing. Retinal detachment and endophthalmitis appear to be the main prognostic factors requiring urgent specialized pediatric ophthalmology management.

[Contribution of technological aids to the extraction of orbital foreign bodies]. / Apport des aides technologiques dans l'extraction des corps étrangers orbitaires.

BACKGROUND: Removal of orbital foreign bodies is a surgical challenge. The purpose of this study is to report our experience in the removal of orbital foreign bodies and to evaluate the usefulness of various technological aids in their removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study at Nice University Hospital (France) from January 2017 to December 2023. All patients undergoing surgery for an orbital foreign body during the study period were included. Data recorded included the nature of the orbital foreign body, its size, location, surgical route, outcome (success, partial success, failure), and technological aids used (intraoperative navigation, intraoperative imaging scope, orbital magnet). Concurrently, we designed a dedicated orbital magnet, which was tested in the anatomy laboratory and in two of our patients. RESULTS: Six patients, all young men, were included during the study period. Removal was successful, partially successful, or unsuccessful in one-third of cases, respectively. Failure was associated with orbital foreign bodies located in the intraconal or posterior orbital space. Preoperatively, the use of a "low-artifact" scanner allowed us to better determine the exact size and shape of the orbital foreign body. Intraoperative navigation was not accurate enough, due to the mobility of the orbital bodies within the orbital fat. In our experience, intraoperative scope imaging was more accurate. The use of a dedicated orbital magnet was successfully tested in the anatomy laboratory and allowed the removal of a small orbital foreign body in one of our patients. Intraoperative surgical videos are provided. CONCLUSION: Vegetal orbital foreign bodies must be systematically removed. Removal of non-vegetal orbital foreign bodies should be considered on a case-by-case basis based on their size, best assessed using a "low artifact" scanner, their location, and their intrinsic ferromagnetism. Intraoperative navigation does not appear useful, while intraoperative scope imaging does. A dedicated orbital magnet might be helpful in removing ferromagnetic orbital foreign bodies. However, an orbital magnet may be ineffective in removing intraorbital bullets, since they are made primarily of an alloy of copper and lead.

Case Report: Ophthalmia Nodosa Caused by Caterpillar Setae.

Caterpillars can damage human health, including visual acuity, as a result of penetration of the setae into the eye or their layout on the eye tissue. However, the path of setae movement in the eye remains unclear. In this study, a 43-year-old woman was injured in the left eye by a caterpillar. Other than rubbing her eye, the patient did not attempt any type of treatment, and she visited our outpatient clinic 5 days after the accident. The patient's left eyelid was markedly swollen, with a visual acuity of 1.0 in the right eye and only 0.04 in the left eye. Images of the setae in the eye were taken using an oil lens microscope, which showed clearly their detailed characteristics. The setae were removed from the eye as much as possible. Topical eyedrops and oral steroids were used to reduce the inflammation. Vitritis and retinitis occurred at the 6-month follow-up and was classified as ophthalmia nodosa by the ophthalmologist. Before we did our study, some ophthalmologists believed that setae moved forward; however, we found that setae in the eye moved in a disorderly fashion. We also note that all setae should be removed. This case demonstrates that caterpillar setae in the eye move in a disorderly fashion and eventually caused ophthalmia nodosa.

A Modification of the Intraocular Lens Blocking Technique Without Posterior Capsulorhexis for Intraocular Foreign Body Removal.

PURPOSE: The intraocular lens blocking technique described for the removal of intraocular foreign bodies emerged as a result of an effort to prevent the foreign body from being retracted into the posterior segment because of the resistance encountered while removing it from the corneal incision. However, in the technique described, in addition to the difficulty of the surgical procedure, the new concern is to create a posterior capsulorhexis according to the size of the foreign body and to pass the foreign body through the capsulorhexis. METHODS: Here, the authors describe a new approach to the intraocular lens blocking technique. In this approach, the intraocular foreign body, which is held with intraocular forceps without any opening in the posterior capsule, is held in a perpendicular position to the long axis, lifted directly into the anterior chamber, and safely removed from the front of the monoblock foldable intraocular lens. RESULTS: In all patients treated with this approach, IOFBs were successfully removed without intraoperative or postoperative complications, and postoperative intraocular lens centralization was achieved in all patients. CONCLUSION: This approach may provide practicality to the intraocular lens blocking technique.

Management of scleral tears with concurrent intraocular foreign bodies and factors affecting outcomes.

AIM: To report the clinical settings and factors predicting outcomes in scleral tears with concurrent retained intraocular foreign bodies METHODS: All cases with scleral and corneoscleral wounds with retained intraocular foreign bodies (RIOFB) from January 2014 to January 2021 were retrospectively analysed. Favourable anatomic outcome was defined as presence of globe integrity, attached retina, absence of hypotony and active inflammation at last visit. Favourable functional outcome was defined as final visual acuity (VA) > 20/200. RESULTS: Total 139 eyes were included. Mean age was 30.66 ± 13.32 years (median 29 years, IQR 17). Penetrating trauma accounted for 87.1%, rupture for 5.8%, perforation for 7.2%. In 5.8% of the eyes the injury involved zone I extending till Zone II while in 66.9% it involved Zone II and in 27.3% in Zone III. Snellen visual acuity at presentation was logMAR 2.97 ± 1.01 and at last visit was logMAR 2.38 ± 1.45 (p < 0.0001). Time between presentation and repair was 13.93 ± 19.56 h (median 7.6 h, IQR 17.17). Favourable functional outcome was seen in 34.5% eyes and 2/3rd achieved favourable anatomic outcome. Absence of endophthalmitis (OR = 6.25, p = 0.003) and ability to remove the foreign body (OR = 7.05, p = 0.003) were associated with a favourable anatomic outcome. Better presenting Snellen visual acuity (OR = 2.77, p = 0.003), manifest scleral tear (OR = 3.36, p = 0.04), and absence of endophthalmitis (OR = 50, p = 0.0009) were associated with a favourable functional outcome. CONCLUSION: A third of the cases achieved favourable visual outcome while 2/3rd achieved favourable anatomic outcome. Absence of endophthalmitis is an important factor predicting both.

Quiescent caterpillar hair: A rare cause of localised lenticular opacity formation.

PURPOSE: To report a rare case of a 65 year old patient with a single caterpillar hair with localised lenticular opacity around it and no active inflammation. OBSERVATIONS: A single quiescent caterpillar hair embedded in the anterior lens capsule causing localised cataract around it. There was no other sign of ocular toxicosis and the patient was unaware of the presence of this intraocular foreign body. CONCLUSIONS: Caterpillar hair (also known as setae) are a common cause of ophthalmia nodosa. These setae can penetrate intraocularly with ease to cause various forms of ocular toxicosis ranging from conjunctivitis, keratitis, pars planitis, chorioretinitis to even severe vitritis warranting enucleation. As per our knowledge and experience, no case of caterpillar hair without inflammation has been reported till date. We hereby report a rare case of a 65 year old patient with a single caterpillar hair embedded in the anterior lens capsule causing localised cataract around it without any active inflammation. In our opinion, if the eye is quiescent, the patient should be kept on close and long term follow-up and active intervention can be undertaken at the first instance of inflammation or if cataract progresses.