Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.477
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0308948, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39146321

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Management of sedation, analgesia, and delirium influences morbidity, mortality, and quality of life in patients treated in intensive care. Assessing quality indicators as part of a quality management and assurance program is an established method to ensure process quality. Currently, there is limited research on the effect of evaluating quality indicators on economic outcomes. The aim of the study was to investigate the adherence to an indicator on management of sedation, analgesia and delirium, and explore potential effects on hospital economics and clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed routine data from 20,220 patient records from the hospital information system of a tertiary university hospital, collected from January 2012 to December 2019. We compared two predefined subgroups with either high indicator adherence or low indicator adherence regarding factors like disease severity scores, comorbidities, and outcome measures. We used logistic regression models to examine the influence of quality indicator adherence on economic measures such as Diagnosis-related group (DRG) incomes, revenue margins, and costs, and clinical outcomes. Additionally, we used propensity score matching to probe our findings. RESULTS: Overall revenue margins in this cohort were negative (-320€). High adherence to the quality indicator was associated with a positive revenue margin (+197€) compared to low adherence (-482€). Higher adherence was also associated with lower costs. Additionally, high adherence was associated with reduced mortality (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.95) and reduced duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay (17 hours and 1 day respectively). CONCLUSION: Higher adherence to a quality indicator for sedation, analgesia, and delirium management was associated with economic returns and costs. We also found an association with lower mortality and reduced length of stay. Further research on these associations may help identify opportunities for quality improvement without increased resource use.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia , Cuidados Críticos , Delirio , Humanos , Delirio/economía , Delirio/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Alemania , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Analgesia/economía , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía
5.
Surgery ; 176(2): 485-491, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806334

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Abdominal compartment syndrome has been shown to be a highly morbid condition among patients admitted to the intensive care unit. The present study sought to characterize trends as well as clinical and financial outcomes of patients with abdominal compartment syndrome. METHODS: The 2010 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample was used to identify adults (≥18 years) admitted to the intensive care unit. Standard mean differences were obtained to demonstrate effect size with >0.1 denoting significance. Hospitals were divided into tertiles based on annual institutional intensive care unit admissions. Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate the association of abdominal compartment syndrome on outcomes. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality, while complications, costs, and length of stay were secondarily considered. RESULTS: Of 11,804,585 patients, 19,644 (0.17%) developed abdominal compartment syndrome. Over the study period, the incidence of abdominal compartment syndrome (2010-0.19%, 2020-0.20%, P < .001) remained similar. Those with abdominal compartment syndrome were more commonly admitted for gastrointestinal (22.8% vs 8.4%) and cardiovascular (22.6% vs 14.9%) etiologies and were more frequently managed at urban teaching hospitals (77.7% vs 65.1%) as well as high-volume intensive care units (85.2% vs 79.1%) (all standard mean differences >0.1). After adjustment, abdominal compartment syndrome was associated with higher odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 3.84, 95% confidence interval: 3.57-4.13, reference: non-abdominal compartment syndrome). Incremental length of stay (ß: +5.0 days, 95% confidence interval: 4.2-5.8) and costs (ß: $49.3K, 95% confidence interval: 45.3-53.4) were significantly higher in abdominal compartment syndrome compared to non-abdominal compartment syndrome. CONCLUSION: Abdominal compartment syndrome, while an uncommon occurrence among intensive care unit patients, remains highly morbid with significant resource burden. Further work exploring factors to mitigate its clinical and financial burden is needed.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Hipertensión Intraabdominal , Tiempo de Internación , Humanos , Hipertensión Intraabdominal/epidemiología , Hipertensión Intraabdominal/terapia , Hipertensión Intraabdominal/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Incidencia , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía
6.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 97(4): e53-e57, 2024 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706096

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: The prior articles in this series have focused on measuring cost and quality in acute care surgery. This third article in the series explains the current ways of defining value in acute care surgery, based on different stakeholders in the health care system-the patient, the health care organization, the payer and society. The heterogenous valuations of the different stakeholders require that the framework for determining high-value care in acute care surgery incorporates all viewpoints. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Expert Opinion; Level V.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/normas , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Cirugía de Cuidados Intensivos
7.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(5): 2773-2778, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38771369

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Determine if anterior internal versus supra-acetabular external fixation of unstable pelvic fractures is associated with care needs or discharge. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at two tertiary trauma referral centers. Adults with unstable pelvis fractures (AO/OTA 61B/61C) who received operative fixation of the anterior and posterior pelvic ring by two orthopedic trauma surgeons from October 2020 to November 2022 were included. The primary outcome was discharge destination. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) or ventilator days, length of stay, and hospital charges. RESULTS: Eighty-three eligible patients were 38.6% female, with a mean age of 47.2 ± 20.3 years and BMI 28.1 ± 6.4 kg/m2. Fifty-nine patients (71.1%) received anterior pelvis internal fixation and 24 (28.9%) received external fixation. External fixation was associated with weight-bearing restrictions (91.7% versus 49.2%, p = 0.01). No differences in demographic, functional status, insurance type, fracture classification, or injury severity measures were observed by treatment. Internal versus external anterior pelvic fixation was not associated with discharge to home (49.2% versus 29.2%, p = 0.10), median ICU days (3.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 7.8 versus 5.5 [IQR 4.3], p = 0.14, ventilator days (0 [IQR 6.0] versus 0 [IQR 2.8], p = 0.51), length of stay (13.0 [IQR 13.0] versus 17.5 (IQR 20.5), p = 0.38), or total hospital charges (US dollars 180,311 [IQR 219,061.75] versus 243,622 [IQR 187,111], p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior internal versus supra-acetabular external fixation of unstable pelvis fractures was not significantly associated with discharge destination, critical care, hospital length of stay, or hospital charges. This sample may be underpowered to detect differences between groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fijación de Fractura , Fracturas Óseas , Precios de Hospital , Tiempo de Internación , Alta del Paciente , Huesos Pélvicos , Humanos , Femenino , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Huesos Pélvicos/lesiones , Precios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/economía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fijación de Fractura/métodos , Fijación de Fractura/economía , Adulto
11.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 96(6): 986-991, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38439149

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Acute care surgery (ACS) patients are frequently faced with significant long-term recovery and financial implications that extend far beyond their hospitalization. While major injury and emergency general surgery (EGS) emergencies are often viewed solely as acute moments of crisis, the impact on patients can be lifelong. Financial outcomes after major injury or emergency surgery have only begun to be understood. The Healthcare Economics Committee from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma previously published a conceptual overview of financial toxicity in ACS, highlighting the association between financial outcomes and long-term physical recovery. The aims of second-phase financial toxicity review by the Healthcare Economics Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma are to (1) understand the unique impact of financial toxicity on ACS patients; (2) delineate the current limitations surrounding measurement domains of financial toxicity in ACS; (3) explore the "when, what and how" of optimally capturing financial outcomes in ACS; and (4) delineate next steps for integration of these financial metrics in our long-term patient outcomes. As acute care surgeons, our patients' recovery is often contingent on equal parts physical, emotional, and financial recovery. The ACS community has an opportunity to impact long-term patient outcomes and well-being far beyond clinical recovery.


Asunto(s)
Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Heridas y Lesiones/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/economía , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Cirugía de Cuidados Intensivos
13.
CMAJ Open ; 10(1): E126-E135, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35168935

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation is an important component of patient critical care, but it adds expense to an already high-cost setting. This study evaluates the cost-utility of 2 modes of ventilation: proportional-assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors (PAV+ mode) versus pressure-support ventilation (PSV). METHODS: We adapted a published Markov model to the Canadian hospital-payer perspective with a 1-year time horizon. The patient population modelled includes all patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation who have completed the acute phase of ventilatory support and have entered the recovery phase. Clinical and cost inputs were informed by a structured literature review, with the comparative effectiveness of PAV+ mode estimated via pragmatic meta-analysis. Primary outcomes of interest were costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the (incremental) cost per QALY for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Results were reported in 2017 Canadian dollars. We conducted probabilistic and scenario analyses to assess model uncertainty. RESULTS: Over 1 year, PSV had costs of $50 951 and accrued 0.25 QALYs. Use of PAV+ mode was associated with care costs of $43 309 and 0.29 QALYs. Compared to PSV, PAV+ mode was considered likely to be cost-effective, having lower costs (-$7642) and increased QALYs (+0.04) after 1 year. In cost-effectiveness acceptability analysis, 100% of simulations would be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per QALY gained. INTERPRETATION: Use of PAV+ mode is expected to benefit patient care in the intensive care unit (ICU) and be a cost-effective alternative to PSV in the Canadian setting. Canadian hospital payers may therefore consider how best to optimally deliver mechanical ventilation in the ICU as they expand ICU capacity.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Cuidados Críticos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiología , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultados de Cuidados Críticos , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Esperanza de Vida , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Respiración Artificial/economía , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 92(1): e1-e9, 2022 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34570063

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With health care expenditures continuing to increase rapidly, the need to understand and provide value has become more important than ever. In order to determine the value of care, the ability to accurately measure cost is essential. The acute care surgeon leader is an integral part of driving improvement by engaging in value increasing discussions. Different approaches to quantifying cost exist depending on the purpose of the analysis and available resources. Cost analysis methods range from detailed microcosting and time-driven activity-based costing to less complex gross and expenditure-based approaches. An overview of these methods and a practical approach to costing based on the needs of the acute care surgeon leader is presented.


Asunto(s)
Costos y Análisis de Costo/métodos , Cuidados Críticos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/clasificación , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Escalas de Valor Relativo
15.
P R Health Sci J ; 40(3): 120-126, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34792925

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Although the lack of health insurance has been linked to poor health outcomes in several diseases, this relationship is still understudied in trauma. There exist differences between the Puerto Rico health care system and that of the United States. We therefore aimed to assess mortality disparities related to insurance coverage at the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital (PRTH). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who sustained penetrating injuries (presenting at the PRTH from 2000 to 2014) was performed. Individuals were classified by their insurance status. Study variables comprised demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the association between health insurance status and risk of dying. RESULTS: Patients with public health insurance experienced more complications than did individuals who had private health insurance (PrHI) or who were uninsured. This group had longer durations of mechanical ventilation and spent more time in the hospital than did patients who had PrHI or who were uninsured. However, uninsured patients with gunshot wounds were 54% (adjusted odds ratio = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.36) more likely to die than were their counterparts who had PrHI. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that having health insurance could reduce a given patient mortality risk in trauma settings. More studies with larger samples are warranted to confirm these findings. If these findings hold true, then providing equitable access to health services for the entire population could prevent patients suffering trauma from having premature, preventable deaths.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Heridas Penetrantes/etnología , Heridas Penetrantes/mortalidad , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Heridas Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas Penetrantes/terapia
16.
World Neurosurg ; 152: e476-e483, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34098141

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: No established standard of care currently exists for the postoperative management of patients with surgically resected pituitary adenomas. Our objective was to quantify the efficacy of a postoperative stepdown unit protocol for reducing patient cost. METHODS: In 2018-2020, consecutive patients undergoing transsphenoidal microsurgical resection of sellar lesions were managed postoperatively in the full intensive care unit (ICU) or an ICU-based surgical stepdown unit based on preset criteria. Demographic variables, surgical outcomes, and patient costs were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (27 stepdown, 27 full ICU; no difference in age or sex) were identified. Stepdown patients were also compared with 634 historical control patients. The total hospital length of stay was no different among stepdown, ICU, and historical patients (4.8 ± 1.0 vs. 5.9 ± 2.8 vs. 4.4 ± 4.3 days, respectively, P = 0.1). Overall costs were 12.5% less for stepdown patients (P = 0.01), a difference mainly driven by reduced facility utilization costs of -8.9% (P = 0.02). The morbidity and complication rates were similar in the stepdown and full ICU groups. Extrapolation of findings to historical patients suggested that ∼$225,000 could have been saved from 2011 to 2016. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that use of a postoperative stepdown unit could result in a 12.5% savings for eligible patients undergoing treatment of pituitary tumors by shifting patients to a less acute unit without worsened surgical outcomes. Historical controls indicate that over half of all pituitary patients would be eligible. Further refinement of patient selection for less costly perioperative management may reduce cost burden for the health care system and patients.


Asunto(s)
Adenoma/economía , Adenoma/cirugía , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/economía , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/economía , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Cuidados Posoperatorios/economía , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Hueso Esfenoides/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Control de Costos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Silla Turca/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Anesthesiol Clin ; 39(2): 285-292, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34024431

RESUMEN

It is difficult to predict the future course and length of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, which has devastated health care systems in low- and middle-income countries. Anesthesiology and critical care services are hard hit because many hospitals have stopped performing elective surgeries, staff and scarce hospital resources have been diverted to manage COVID-19 patients, and several makeshift COVID-19 units had to be set up. Intensive care units are overwhelmed with critically ill patients. In these difficult times, low- and middle-income countries need to improvise, perform indigenous research, adapt international guidelines to suit local needs, and target attainable clinical goals.


Asunto(s)
Anestesiología/organización & administración , COVID-19 , Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Recursos en Salud/organización & administración , Pandemias , Anestesiología/economía , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Países en Desarrollo , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Nepal
18.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(11): e020201, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33998289

RESUMEN

Background In pediatric cardiac surgery, perioperative management has evolved from slow weaning of mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit to "ultra-fast-track" anesthesia with early extubation (EE) in theater to promote a faster recovery. The strategy of EE has not been assessed in adults with congenital heart disease, a growing population of patients who often require surgery. Methods And Results Data were collected retrospectively on all patients >16 years of age who underwent adult congenital heart surgery in our tertiary center between December 2012 and January 2020. Coarsened exact matching was performed for relevant baseline variables. Overall, 711 procedures were performed: 133 (18.7%) patients underwent EE and 578 (81.3%) patients received conventional extubation. After matching, patients who received EE required less inotropic or vasopressor support in the early postoperative period (median Vasoactive-inotropic score 0.5 [0.0-2.0] versus 2.0 [0.0-3.5]; P<0.0001) and had a lower total net fluid balance than patients after conventional extubation (1168±723 versus 847±733 mL; P=0.0002). The overall reintubation rate was low at 0.3%. EE was associated with a significantly shorter postoperative length of stay in higher dependency care units before a "step-down" to ward-based care (48 [45-50] versus 50 [47-69] hours; P=0.004). Lower combined intensive care unit and high dependency unit costs were incurred by patients who received EE compared with patients who received conventional extubation (£3949 [3430-4222] versus £4166 [3893-5603]; P<0.0001). Conclusions In adult patients undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease, EE is associated with a reduced need for postoperative hemodynamic support, a shorter intensive care unit stay, and lower health-care-related costs.


Asunto(s)
Extubación Traqueal/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Adulto , Extubación Traqueal/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
19.
J Burn Care Res ; 42(4): 610-616, 2021 08 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33963756

RESUMEN

Although prior studies have demonstrated the utility of real-time pressure mapping devices in preventing pressure ulcers, there has been little investigation of their efficacy in burn intensive care unit (BICU) patients, who are at especially high risk for these hospital-acquired injuries. This study retrospectively reviewed clinical records of BICU patients to investigate the utility of pressure mapping data in determining the incidence, predictors, and associated costs of hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs). Of 122 patients, 57 (47%) were studied prior to implementation of pressure mapping and 65 (53%) were studied after implementation. The HAPI rate was 18% prior to implementation of pressure monitoring, which declined to 8% postimplementation (chi square: P = .10). HAPIs were less likely to be stage 3 or worse in the postimplementation cohort (P < .0001). On multivariable-adjusted regression accounting for known predictors of HAPIs in burn patients, having had at least 12 hours of sustained pressure loading in one area significantly increased odds of developing a pressure injury in that area (odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.5, P = .04). Patients who developed HAPIs were significantly more likely to have had unsuccessful repositioning efforts in comparison to those who did not (P = .02). Finally, implementation of pressure mapping resulted in significant cost savings-$6750 (standard deviation: $1008) for HAPI-related care prior to implementation, vs $3800 (standard deviation: $923) after implementation, P = .008. In conclusion, the use of real-time pressure mapping decreased the morbidity and costs associated with HAPIs in BICU patients.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/economía , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Úlcera por Presión/economía , Adulto , Quemaduras/epidemiología , Humanos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...