RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To analyze the associations between development of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and regular use of aspirin or non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NA-NSAIDs). METHODS: We retrospectively recruited individuals who received ≥28-day prescriptions of aspirin or NA-NSAIDs exclusively between 2008 and 2017 in one tertiary center as regular users. Non-regular users were free from regular use of any anti-inflammatory drugs and were matched to regular users in terms of age, sex, and visit date at a ratio of 1-4:1. The aspirin cohort included 36,771 regular users and 110,808 matched non-regular users, while the NA-NSAID cohort included 59,569 regular users and 179,732 matched non-regular users. Stratified multivariate Cox regression analyses with adjustment for systemic confounding factors were performed for the development of AMD and neovascular AMD. RESULTS: In the aspirin cohort, the adjusted hazard ratios of aspirin use for AMD in the whole cohort, individuals without cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), and those with CVDs were 0.664, 0.618, and 0.702, respectively (P < 0.0001 for all), while those of aspirin use for neovascular AMD were 0.486, 0.313, and 0.584 (P < 0.05 for all), respectively. In the NA-NSAID cohort, regular use of NA-NSAIDs was associated with a decreased risk of AMD (hazard ratio = 0.823, P < 0.0001) and neovascular AMD (hazard ratio = 0.720, P = 0.040) only in people without arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: Regular use of aspirin or NA-NSAIDs had protective effects on AMD and neovascular AMD. The effect of aspirin was observed in all patients, while the effect of NA-NSAIDs was observed only in people without arthritis.
Asunto(s)
Artritis , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Agudeza Visual , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamente , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Artritis/inducido químicamente , Artritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Importance: Aflibercept biosimilars can expand available treatment options in retinal diseases and have the potential to improve patient access to safe and effective therapy. Objective: To establish equivalence in efficacy and similarity in safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of SB15 and reference aflibercept (AFL) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a randomized double-masked parallel group phase 3 trial conducted at 56 centers in 10 countries from June 2020 to March 2022, including follow-up through 56 weeks. Of 549 screened participants, 449 participants 50 years and older with treatment-naive nAMD were included and randomly assigned to SB15 (n = 224) or AFL (n = 225). Key exclusion criteria included considerable scarring, fibrosis, atrophy, and hemorrhage. This report includes results up to the end of the parallel group period at week 32. Of the 449 randomized participants, 438 (97.6%) completed week 32 follow-up. Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 2 mg of SB15 or AFL every 4 weeks for the first 12 weeks (3 injections), followed by dosing every 8 weeks up to week 48, with final assessments at week 56. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to week 8 with predefined equivalence margins of -3 letters to 3 letters. Other key end points were changes in BCVA and central subfield thickness up to week 32, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Results: The mean (SD) age among the 449 included participants was 74.0 (8.1) years, and 250 participants (55.7%) were female. Baseline demographic characteristics and most disease characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. The least squares mean change in BCVA from baseline to week 8 in the SB15 group was equivalent to that in the AFL group (6.7 letters vs 6.6 letters, respectively; difference, 0.1 letters; 95% CI, -1.3 to 1.4). Comparable efficacy between treatment groups was maintained up to week 32 (least squares mean change from baseline in BCVA: SB15, 7.6 letters vs AFL, 6.5 letters; least squares mean change from baseline in central subfield thickness: SB15, -110.4 µm vs AFL, -115.7 µm). No clinically relevant differences were observed in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (SB15, 107/224 [47.8%] vs AFL, 98/224 [43.8%]) and ocular TEAEs in the study eye (SB15, 41/224 [18.3%] vs AFL, 28/224 [12.5%]). The serum concentration profiles and cumulative incidences of overall antidrug antibody positive participants were comparable. Conclusions and Relevance: In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, SB15 and AFL showed equivalent efficacy and comparable safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity in participants with nAMD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04450329.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Degeneración Macular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza Visual , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/efectos adversos , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamente , Ranibizumab/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To develop a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model (popPKPD) of intravitreal bevacizumab treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients to learn about the PK/PD relationship and utilise it for dosing regimen decisions on future nAMD patients. METHODS: The Greater Manchester Avastin for Neovascularisation (GMAN) randomised clinical trial data was retrospectively utilised, and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular retinal thickness (CRT, measured by optical coherence tomography) were the PD inputs to the model. Using the nonlinear mixed-effects method, the best PKPD structural model was investigated, and the clinical significance of the two different dosing treatment regimens (as-needed versus routine) was evaluated. RESULTS: A structural model to describe the change of BCVA from the baseline of nAMD patients was successfully obtained based on the turnover PD model concept (drug stimulates the "visual acuity response production"). The popPKPD model and simulation indicate that the routine regimen protocol improves patient visual outcome compared to the as-needed protocol. For the change in CRT, the turnover structural PKPD model was too demanding to fit to the given clinical data. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first popPKPD attempt in nAMD treatment that shows the potential of this strategy to understand/inform the dosing regimen. Clinical trials with richer PD data will provide the means to build more robust models.
Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/farmacología , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Bevacizumab , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Ranibizumab , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamente , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Age related macular degeneration (AMD) is the major cause of visual loss in the aging population in the Western world. In past decade, intra ocular injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) pharmaceuticals have revolutionized therapy for exudative (edematous-wet) AMD and become standard practice for the near term. However repeated intra-ocular injections are required for years and long terms results have been limited. The pathogenesis of this condition is multifactorial involving genetic, ischemic, inflammatory factors leading to neovascularization, edema and retinal pigment epithelial scaring resulting in photoreceptor destruction. Based on coincidental observation in reduction in AMD related macular edema on ocular coherence tomography (OCT) in a BoNT A treated patient with facial movement disease, BoNT-A at conventional doses targeting the para orbital area was added to therapeutic regiment in a small number of patients with exudative macular degeneration or related diseases. Measurements of edema and choriocapillaris using Spectral Doman (OCT) and Ocular Coherence Angiography (OCT-A) and Snellen visual acuity were made over the evaluation period. 15 eyes in 14 patients averaged 361 µm central sub foveal edema (CSFT) pre injection and average of 266 µm (CSFT) post injection over an average of 21 months and 5.7 cycles using BoNT A alone at conventional doses (n = 86 post injection measurements, paired t-test p < 0.001 two tailed). Visions at baseline in patients with 20/40 or worse averaged 20/100- pre injection improved to an average of 20/40- in the post injection period (n = 49 measurements p < 0.002 paired t-test). The previous data was added to a group of 12 more severely afflicted patients receiving anti VEGF (aflibercept or bevacizumab) (total 27 patients). With this 27-patient group, patients were followed for an average of 20 months and receiving average of 6 cycles at conventional doses. Improvement in exudative edema and vision were noted with pre injection baseline CSFT average 399.5, post injection average 267, n = 303 post measurement, independent t-test P < 0.0001.). Snellen vision 20/128 baseline average improved to average of 20/60- during post injection period (n = 157 post injection measurements, p < 0.0001 paired t-test to baseline). No substantial adverse effects were noted. Cyclic effects were noted corresponding to duration of action of BoNT-A on a number of patients. The above data is preliminary and is skewed toward early leakage for all conditions. BoNT A may have a role in the treatment of aged related macular degeneration. Controlled studies are needed with careful staging and baseline stratifications for multi-modal management paradigms. The findings are discussed relative to known botulinum toxin type A pharmacology and AMD pathogenesis.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Neovascularización Coroidal , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Humanos , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/toxicidad , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Neovascularización Coroidal/inducido químicamente , Neovascularización Coroidal/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamente , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/complicaciones , Edema/inducido químicamente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de SeguimientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate visual acuity (VA) and injection intervals in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) after 12 months of brolucizumab therapy in clinical practice. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults in the United States-based IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) with nAMD who received brolucizumab exclusively for 12 months (2308 eyes of 2079 patients). METHODS: Observational study of eyes with a first injection of brolucizumab (index), followed by 2 or more brolucizumab injections over the following 12 months without switching to another anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were change in best recorded VA and, for eyes receiving prior anti-VEGF therapy (treatment-experienced eyes), the difference between the brolucizumab injection interval at 12 months and the anti-VEGF injection interval before switching. The interval before switching was defined as the time between the prior anti-VEGF and index brolucizumab injections; brolucizumab interval was the time between the closest injection to day 365 and the preceding injection. Secondary outcomes included incident adverse events. RESULTS: Overall VA at index was 61.6 ± 18.4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters; 83.7% of treatment-naive eyes (184/220) and 86.1% of treatment-experienced eyes (1797/2088) showed stable (< 10 letters gained or lost) or improved (≥ 10 letters gained) VA at 12 months. Among treatment-experienced eyes receiving a prior anti-VEGF injection within 365 days before index, 29.5% (594/2015) showed an interval before switching of 8 weeks or more (mean, 7.6 ± 5.5 weeks), whereas 83.1% (1734/2015) showed a brolucizumab injection interval at 12 months of 8 weeks or more (mean, 10.3 ± 4.0 weeks). In all, 77.1% of treatment-experienced eyes (1554/2015) showed an interval extension of 1 week or more; of these, 55.4% (861/1554) showed an extension of 4 weeks or more. CONCLUSIONS: In this community-based study, at 12 months, brolucizumab treatment prolonged the interval between anti-VEGF injections for most treatment-experienced eyes, particularly those with shorter intervals before switching, while maintaining or improving VA. With careful balancing of the benefits and risks, switching to brolucizumab treatment may offer the advantage of extending the treatment interval for patients with a high anti-VEGF therapy burden. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report 2-year results from the Archway clinical trial of the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN: Phase 3, randomized, multicenter, open-label, active-comparator-controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with previously treated nAMD diagnosed within 9 months of screening and responsive to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomized 3:2 to PDS with ranibizumab 100 mg/ml with fixed refill-exchanges every 24 weeks (PDS Q24W) or intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg injections every 4 weeks (monthly ranibizumab). Patients were followed through 4 complete refill-exchange intervals (â¼2 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score from baseline averaged over weeks 44 and 48, weeks 60 and 64, and weeks 88 and 92 (noninferiority margin, -3.9 ETDRS letters). RESULTS: The PDS Q24W was noninferior to monthly ranibizumab, with differences in adjusted mean change in BCVA score from baseline averaged over weeks 44/48, 60/64 and 88/92 of -0.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.8 to +1.3), +0.4 (95% CI, -1.4 to +2.1) and -0.6 ETDRS letters (95% CI, -2.5 to +1.3), respectively. Anatomic outcomes were generally comparable between arms through week 96. Through each of 4 PDS refill-exchange intervals, 98.4%, 94.6%, 94.8%, and 94.7% of PDS Q24W patients assessed did not receive supplemental ranibizumab treatment. The PDS ocular safety profile was generally unchanged from primary analysis. Prespecified ocular adverse events of special interest (AESI) were reported in 59 (23.8%) PDS and 17 (10.2%) monthly ranibizumab patients. The most common AESI reported in both arms was cataract (PDS Q24W, 22 [8.9%]; monthly ranibizumab, 10 [6.0%]). Events in the PDS Q24W arm included (patient incidence) 10 (4.0%) conjunctival erosions, 6 (2.4%) conjunctival retractions, 4 (1.6%) endophthalmitis cases, and 4 (1.6%) implant dislocations. Serum ranibizumab sampling showed that the PDS continuously released ranibizumab over the 24-week refill-exchange interval and ranibizumab serum concentrations were within the range experienced with monthly ranibizumab. CONCLUSIONS: The PDS Q24W showed noninferior efficacy to monthly ranibizumab through approximately 2 years, with approximately 95% of PDS Q24W patients not receiving supplemental ranibizumab treatment in each refill-exchange interval. The AESIs were generally manageable, with learnings continually implemented to minimize PDS-related AEs. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Asunto(s)
Retinopatía Diabética , Degeneración Macular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Humanos , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Agudeza Visual , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is driven by VEGFs A, C, and D, which promote angiogenesis and vascular permeability. Intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF-A drugs are the standard of care, but these do not inhibit VEGF-C and D, which may explain why many patients fail to respond fully. This trial aimed to test the safety and efficacy of OPT-302, a biologic inhibitor of VEGF-C and D, in combination with the anti-VEGF-A inhibitor ranibizumab. DESIGN: Dose-ranging, phase 2b, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Participants with treatment-naive nAMD were enrolled from 109 sites across Europe, Israel, and the United States. METHODS: Participants were randomized to 6, 4-weekly, intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg OPT-302, 2.0 mg OPT-302, or sham, plus intravitreal 0.5 mg ranibizumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was mean change in ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes (comparing baseline with week 24) were the proportion of participants gaining or losing ≥ 15 ETDRS BCVA letters; area under the ETDRS BCVA over time curve; change in spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) central subfield thickness; and change in intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid on SD-OCT. RESULTS: Of 366 participants recruited from December 1, 2017, to November 30, 2018, 122, 123, and 121 were randomized to 0.5 mg OPT-302, 2.0 mg OPT-302, and sham, respectively. Mean (± standard deviation) visual acuity gain in the 2.0 mg OPT-302 group was significantly superior to sham (+14.2 ± 11.61 vs. +10.8 ± 11.52 letters; P = 0.01). The 0.5 mg OPT-302 group was not significantly different than the sham group (+9.44 ± 11.32 letters; P = 0.83). Compared with sham, the secondary BCVA outcomes favored the 2.0 mg OPT-302 group, with structural outcomes favoring both OPT-302 dosage groups. Adverse events (AEs) were similar across groups, with 16 (13.3%), 7 (5.6%), and 10 (8.3%) participants in the lower-dose, higher-dose, and sham groups, respectively, developing at least 1 serious AE. Two unrelated deaths both occurred in the sham arm. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly superior vision gain was observed with OPT-302 2.0 mg combination therapy, versus standard of care, with favorable safety (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03345082). FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Asunto(s)
Ranibizumab , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Humanos , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Factor C de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamente , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of patients with age-related macular degeneration who experienced acute vision loss despite periodic injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for 4 years. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients who were diagnosed with treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration and completed a 4-year follow-up. The incidence and risk factors for the occurrence of three or more lines of visual loss at every checkup were investigated. RESULTS: The analysis included 76 eyes of 76 patients. Acute vision loss occurred in 30 eyes (39.5%) over 4 years. Lower baseline best-corrected visual acuity and disrupted ellipsoid zone were independent predictors of vision loss occurrence. Although the causes and timing of visual acuity loss varied, retinal pigment epithelium tears were observed only in the first year. Most patients (86.7%) who experienced vision loss recovered their vision to pre-loss levels at least once; however, the final best-corrected visual acuity was worse than that in the group that did not experience acute vision loss. CONCLUSION: Approximately half of the patients with age-related macular degeneration experienced acute vision loss during a 4-year follow-up, despite continuous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment. Most patients recovered from vision losses temporarily; however, they experienced worse visual outcomes subsequently.
Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Humanos , Preescolar , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Estudios de Seguimiento , Incidencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Epitelio Pigmentado de la Retina , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamente , Ranibizumab/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The advent of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents has revolutionized the treatment of retinal neovascular diseases including neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), a leading cause of irreversible blindness. Multiple agents and methods for drug delivery are emerging to increase the duration of treatment effect and treatment interval, reducing the overall treatment burden on patients and clinicians. The newest agent on the market is faricimab. This medication targets two distinct pathways in retinal angiogenesis, VEGF-A and Ang-2, to create a more durable effect. Phase 3 trials for this drug compared treatment intervals up to 16 weeks against aflibercept dosed at 8-week intervals for both nAMD and diabetic macular edema (DME). While the drug shows similar functional and anatomic outcomes with a low adverse effect profile and trial data demonstrating increased treatment duration, its exact place in the VEGF marketplace is yet to be determined. In this article, we discuss the mechanism of action, pivotal clinical trials leading to approval, and the anticipated role for faricimab in the treatment of retinal neovascular disease.
Asunto(s)
Retinopatía Diabética , Degeneración Macular , Edema Macular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/farmacología , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Ranibizumab , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamente , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) represents a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Neovascular AMD (nAMD) is a subtype of AMD most frequently treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (aVEGF) injections, which has allowed for patients to maintain vision that would have otherwise been lost. However, the need for frequent intravitreal injections for optimal results poses a risk for undertreatment in nAMD patients due to the high treatment burden associated with current aVEGF therapy. Many novel agents and pathways are being explored and targeted for less burdensome treatment options, one of which is the ranibizumab port delivery system (PDS). The PDS is a surgically implanted, refillable device that allows for the sustained release of ranibizumab, a widely used aVEGF agent, into the vitreous cavity. Positive results non-inferior to monthly ranibizumab injections in both phase II and phase III clinical trials allowed for FDA approval of the device with refill intervals of 6 months, which represents the longest approved treatment interval to date for nAMD therapy. This article reviews the need for a durable nAMD treatment option in real-world practice, the clinical trial and extension study data for the PDS, the risk of adverse events and safety profile of the PDS and the potential clinical role of the PDS in answering the real-world needs of nAMD treatment. In addition, other pipeline sustained-treatment modalities are discussed in the context of ongoing clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Ranibizumab , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial , Humanos , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Agudeza Visual , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the association between treatment interval and likelihood of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) discontinuation among patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a real-world setting in the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical cohort study. METHODS: Health insurance claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases were retrospectively reviewed to identify adults with nAMD who received anti-VEGF for the first time between July 1, 2011, and June 30, 2017. The proportion of discontinued patients was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association between treatment intervals at 24 months and anti-VEGF discontinuation. RESULTS: The analysis included 8167 patients on continuous, unilateral anti-VEGF treatment for at least 24 months. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were well balanced between treatment interval groups. The overall rate of discontinuation from 24 months until 60 months after treatment initiation was 30.4%. At 60 months, patients on shorter treatment intervals were more likely to remain on treatment than those on longer intervals, ranging from 76.8% (4-week interval group) to 60.6% (>12-week interval group) and corresponding to a 28% lower likelihood (HR [SE] 0.72 [0.12], P < .01) and 55% higher likelihood of discontinuing treatment (HR [SE] 1.55 [0.07], P < .01), respectively, compared with the 8-week group. CONCLUSIONS: nAMD patients on longer anti-VEGF treatment intervals at 24 months had consistently higher discontinuation rates than patients on shorter intervals in the following years. This highlights the need to support and educate patients on long treatment intervals to continue with their treatment.
Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicare , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamente , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Importance: The port delivery system (PDS) with ranibizumab has demonstrated noninferior and equivalent efficacy compared with monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent, in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), but evaluating patient preference is important to help inform clinical decision-making. Objective: Evaluate treatment satisfaction for ranibizumab delivered via PDS vs intravitreal injections as well as patient preference among those assigned to PDS. Design, Setting, and Participants: Archway was a phase 3 randomized active-comparator open-label clinical trial conducted at 78 sites in the US. Patients 50 years and older with nAMD diagnosed within 9 months of screening with a documented response to anti-VEGF therapy were included. Of 619 patients screened, 418 were enrolled; 415 were included in the primary analysis and 234 were included in the secondary exploratory analysis. The Archway study ran from September 12, 2019, through primary readout on May 22, 2020. Interventions: Patients were randomized 3:2 to PDS with ranibizumab, 100 mg/mL, with fixed refill exchanges every 24 weeks or intravitreal ranibizumab injections, 0.5 mg, every 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Treatment satisfaction was measured using the Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire in the PDS and intravitreal injection arms at week 40. Patient preference was assessed using the content-validated PDS Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPPQ), which measured the proportion of patients in the PDS arm with monthly monitoring who preferred treatment with the PDS at week 40 over previous intravitreal injections or concurrent fellow-eye injections. Both outcomes were exploratory end points. Results: The mean (SD) age of participants at baseline was 75.0 (7.9) years; 234 participants (59%) were women and 162 (41%) were men. At week 40, differences in overall treatment satisfaction scores were minimal for the PDS and intravitreal injection arms (mean, 68.0; 95% CI, 67.4-68.6; n = 237 and mean, 66.1; 95% CI, 64.9-67.3; n = 159, respectively; difference, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.7-3.1). A total of 234 of 248 patients (94.4%) in the PDS arm were included in the PPPQ analysis. At week 40, almost all patients in the PDS arm preferred treatment via PDS (218 of 234 [93.2%]) vs previous intravitreal injections (3 of 234 [1.3%]), including 172 of 234 (73.5%) with a very strong preference for the PDS. In patients who received concurrent fellow-eye injections (n = 78), 72 (92.3%) preferred the PDS. Conclusions and Relevance: Although PDS treatment was preferred by almost all patients assigned to PDS over previous intravitreal injections, both delivery methods have high treatment satisfaction. These findings provide further evidence for the PDS as a meaningful alternative treatment option for patients with nAMD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03677934.
Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular/diagnóstico , Masculino , Prioridad del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Satisfacción Personal , Ranibizumab , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza Visual , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamente , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and therapeutic effects of orally administered AKST4290 (formerly BI 144807 and ALK4290) in treatment-naive patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, open-label Phase 2a pilot clinical study, 30 patients with newly diagnosed neovascular age-related macular degeneration self-administered AKST4290 (400 mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks. Patients were examined weekly for safety, to measure best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and to perform exploratory morphologic assessments. The primary endpoint was the mean change in BCVA from baseline to end of treatment, and the secondary endpoint was safety. Exploratory endpoints investigated potential changes in macular morphology. RESULTS: Mean BCVA improved by +7.0 letters (95% CI, 2.2-11.7); 24 patients (82.8%) had stable or improved BCVA, with 6 (20.7%) gaining ≥15 letters. No patients experienced severe or serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this 6-week study, AKST4290 treatment was associated with improved BCVA scores in patients with treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration. All adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and no safety issues were identified. Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration with AKST4290 warrants further investigation in randomized, placebo-controlled trials.
Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza Visual , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamente , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Importance: The association between residual subretinal fluid (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF) and visual acuity following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment is not well understood. Objective: To examine the association of residual retinal fluid, SRF, and IRF with visual acuity following anti-VEGF treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Data Sources: A systematic literature search was performed from January 2005 to August 2021 using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Study Selection: Peer-reviewed articles reporting on visual acuity stratified by the presence or absence of any residual SRF, IRF, or any retinal fluid at last study observation after intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, or brolucizumab in patients with nAMD were included. Studies that were noncomparative, included fewer than 10 eyes, or reported on other anti-VEGF agents were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction and synthesis. The Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 and ROBINS-I were used to assess risk of bias and GRADE evaluation was conducted to assess certainty of evidence. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were BCVA at last study observation, change in BCVA from baseline, and retinal thickness at last study observation. Results: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, 11 studies (6 randomized clinical trials [RCTs]) comprising 3092 eyes were included in our analysis. Across all included studies, the BCVA of eyes with residual SRF was better than eyes without SRF (weighted mean difference [WMD], 3.1 letter score; 95% CI, 0.05 to 6.18; P = .05; GRADE, low certainty of evidence; 6 studies; 1931 eyes) but similar in RCTs (WMD, 2.7 letter score; 95% CI, -2.40 to 7.84; P = .30; GRADE, low certainty of evidence; 3 studies; 1406 eyes). The BCVA of eyes with residual IRF was worse than that of eyes without IRF (WMD, -8.2 letter score; 95% CI, -11.79 to -4.50; P < .001; GRADE, low; 7 studies; 2114 eyes). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that the presence of residual SRF was associated with slightly better BCVA at last study observation; however, baseline differences in BCVA existed and this conclusion was primarily driven by 1 study. The presence of residual IRF was associated with substantially worse BCVA at last study observation and less improvement of BCVA from baseline. The conclusions are limited by the inclusion of data from observational studies, heterogeneity, and a low certainty of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Retina , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Agudeza Visual , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamente , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether topical acrizanib (LHA510), a small-molecule vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, could suppress the need for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy over a 12-week period in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN: A phase 2 multicenter randomized double-masked, vehicle-controlled proof-of-concept study. METHODS: Trial includes n = 90 patients with active choroidal neovascularization due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration and under anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment. All patients received an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab at baseline and were retreated when there was evidence of disease recurrence (rescue). Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive topical LHA510 or vehicle for 12 weeks. Drops were administered twice a day for 8 weeks and then 3 times a day for the last 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was the number of patients requiring rescue over 84 days of topical dosing. Key secondary outcome measures were time to first rescue, total number of ranibizumab injections, changes in central subfield thickness, and changes of visual acuity from baseline to day 84. RESULTS: The extended per protocol set included 70 patients of whom 25 of 33 patients in the LHA510 group (75.8%) and 25 of 37 patients in the placebo group (67.6%) required rescue by day 84 (P = .8466). Secondary and subgroup analysis did not support evidence of efficacy. Twenty-one of 46 patients administered LHA510 developed a reversible corneal haze that resolved with cessation of treatment and did not recur in patients restarted at once daily frequency. CONCLUSION: In spite of extensive optimization for topical efficacy, LHA510 failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Humanos , Indoles , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Pirazoles , Pirimidinas , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamente , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a progressive, chronic disease of the central area of the retina, which, if untreated, leads to blindness. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of therapy using anti-VEGF drugs, namely brolucizumab and aflibercept, in patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD) during a monitoring period lasting around 20 weeks. The analysis consisted of 40 patients diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, with 20 patients receiving aflibercept (Eylea, Bayer) at a dose of 2 mg/50 µL into the vitreous chamber at the following intervals-3 doses, 4 weeks apart, followed by a fourth dose after 8 weeks. The remaining 20 patients received brolucizumab (Beovu, Novartis) at a dose of 6 mg/50 µL, administered in the following schedule-3 initial doses, 4 weeks apart, with the administration of a fourth dose decided for each patient individually by the doctor, depending on disease activity, assessed through imaging tests. To evaluate treatment effectiveness, the following measurements were used: 'read distance and near visual acuity' for each eye separately using the Snellen chart; and non-invasive retinal imaging techniques-optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA). In patients treated using brolucizumab, during the observation period, statistically significant differences were found in the following parameters: flow area (p = 0.0277); select area (p = 0.0277); FOVEA (p = 0.0073); visus (p = 0.0064). In brolucizumab-treated patients, changes in OCT and OCTA, indicating an improvement, were already visible after the first injection of the drug, whereas in the aflibercept-treated group, changes were only visible after the fourth injection. We found a higher effectiveness of brolucizumab therapy compared to aflibercept in patients with nAMD during an observations period lasting 20 weeks. Our observations are significant, although they require further research.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Agudeza Visual , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamente , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of blindness in the Western world and is characterised in its latter stages by retinal cell death and neovascularisation and earlier stages with the loss of parainflammatory homeostasis. Patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD) are treated with frequent intraocular injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies, which are not only unpopular with patients but carry risks of sight-threatening complications. A minority of patients are unresponsive with no alternative treatment available, and some patients who respond initially eventually develop a tolerance to treatment. New therapeutics with improved delivery methods and sustainability of clinical effects are required, in particular for non-neovascular AMD (90% of cases and no current approved treatments). There are age-related and disease-related changes that occur which can affect ocular drug delivery. Here, we review the latest emerging therapies for AMD, their delivery routes and implications for translating to clinical practice. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue on Inflammation, Repair and Ageing. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v179.9/issuetoc.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Retina , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Agudeza Visual , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamente , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical characteristics of eyes in which investigator-determined new-onset exudative age-related macular degeneration (eAMD) developed during the FILLY trial. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the phase 2 study of intravitreal pegcetacoplan in geographic atrophy (GA). SUBJECTS: Patients with GA secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), n = 246. INTERVENTION: Either 15 mg intravitreal pegcetacoplan or sham given monthly or every other month for 12 months followed by a 6-month off-treatment period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time of new eAMD onset in the study eye, history of eAMD in the fellow eye, presence of double-layer sign (DLS) on structural OCT in the study eye, changes in retinal anatomic features by structural OCT and fluorescein angiography (FA), and changes in visual acuity. RESULTS: Exudation was reported in 26 study eyes across treatment groups over 18 months. Mean time to eAMD diagnosis was 256 days (range, 31-555 days). Overall, a higher proportion of patients with a baseline history of eAMD in the fellow eye (P = 0.016) and a DLS in the study eye (P = 0.0001) demonstrated eAMD. Among study eyes in which eAMD developed, 18 of 26 (69%) had history of fellow-eye eAMD and 19 of 26 (73.1%) had DLS at baseline, compared with 76 of 217 study eyes (35%; P = 0.0007) and 70 of 215 study eyes (32.5%; P < 0.0001), respectively, in which eAMD did not develop. All 21 patients with structural OCT imaging at the time of eAMD diagnosis demonstrated subretinal fluid, intraretinal cysts, or both consistent with exudation. Among 17 patients who underwent FA at eAMD diagnosis, 10 showed detectable macular neovascularization (MNV), all occult lesions. Development of eAMD did not have an appreciable impact on visual acuity, and all patients responded to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal pegcetacoplan slowed the rate of GA growth and was associated with an unexpected dose-dependent increased incidence of eAMD with no temporal clustering of onset. Exudative AMD seemed to be associated with baseline eAMD in the contralateral eye and a DLS, suggestive of nonexudative MNV, in the study eye. The safety profile of pegcetacoplan was acceptable to proceed to phase 3 studies without adjustments to enrollment criteria.
Asunto(s)
Complemento C3/antagonistas & inhibidores , Inactivadores del Complemento/efectos adversos , Atrofia Geográfica/tratamiento farmacológico , Péptidos Cíclicos/efectos adversos , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Inactivadores del Complemento/administración & dosificación , Exudados y Transudados , Femenino , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Atrofia Geográfica/diagnóstico , Atrofia Geográfica/fisiopatología , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Péptidos Cíclicos/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple Ciego , Líquido Subretiniano , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Outcome data are limited regarding early experience with brolucizumab, the most recently approved anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). OBJECTIVE: To report clinical outcomes after intravitreous injection (IVI) of brolucizumab, 6 mg, for nAMD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective case series conducted at 15 private or academic ophthalmological centers in the United States included all consecutive patients with eyes treated with brolucizumab by 6 retina specialists between October 17, 2019, and April 1, 2020. EXPOSURES: Treatment with brolucizumab IVI, 6 mg. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Change in mean visual acuity (VA) and optical coherence tomography parameters, including mean central subfield thickness and presence or absence of subretinal and/or intraretinal fluid. Secondary outcomes included ocular and systemic safety. RESULTS: A total of 172 eyes from 152 patients (87 women [57.2%]; mean [SD] age, 80.0 [8.0] years) were included. Most eyes (166 [96.5%]) were not treatment naive, and 65.7% of these eyes (109 of 166) were switched from the prior anti-VEGF agent because of persistent fluid detected on optical coherence tomography scans. Study eyes received a mean (SD) of 1.46 (0.62) brolucizumab IVIs. The mean (SD) VA prior to starting brolucizumab was a 64.1 (15.9) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score (Snellen equivalent, 20/50) and was a 63.3 (17.2) ETDRS letter score (Snellen equivalent, 20/63) at the last study evaluation (mean difference, 0.8; 95% CI, -2.7 to 4.3; P = .65). When analyzed by number of brolucizumab IVIs, the presence or absence of fluid prior to starting brolucizumab, or the presence or absence of intraocular inflammation after receiving brolucizumab, there was no difference in mean VA prior to starting brolucizumab compared with after brolucizumab IVIs or at the final study evaluation. The mean (SD) central subfield thickness in all eyes prior to starting brolucizumab was 296.7 (88.0) µm and was 269.8 (66.5) µm at the last study examination (mean difference, 26.9 µm; 95% CI, 9.0-44.7 µm; P = .003). Intraocular inflammation was reported in 14 eyes (8.1%) and was self-limited and resolved without treatment in almost half those eyes (n = 6). One previously reported eye (0.6%) had occlusive retinal vasculitis and severe loss of vision. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this analysis of brolucizumab IVI for nAMD, VA remained stable, with a reduction in central subfield thickness. Intraocular inflammation events ranged from mild with spontaneous resolution to severe occlusive retinal vasculitis in 1 eye.
Asunto(s)
Retinopatía Diabética , Degeneración Macular , Vasculitis Retiniana , Uveítis , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular/inducido químicamente , Degeneración Macular/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Vasculitis Retiniana/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Uveítis/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/inducido químicamente , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Oxidative stress, inflammation and neovascularization are the key pathological events that are implicated in human age-related macular degeneration (AMD). There are a limited number of animal models available for evaluating and developing new therapies. Most models represent late exudative or neovascular AMD (nAMD) but there is a relative paucity of models that mimic early events in AMD. The purpose of this study is to characterize the evolution of oxidative stress, inflammation, retinal degeneration and neovascularization in a rat model of AMD, created by subretinal injection of human lipid hydroperoxide (HpODE) that found in the sub-macular region in aged and AMD patients. Subretinal HpODE induced retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and retinal degeneration resulting in loss of RPE cells, photoreceptors and retinal thinning. RPE degeneration and atrophy were detected by day 5, followed by neural tissue degeneration at day 12 with robust TUNEL positive cells. Western blot analysis confirmed an increase in pro-apoptotic Bak protein at day 12 in retinal tissues. Oxidative damage biomarkers (4-hydroxynonenal, malondialdehyde, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, and nitrotyrosine) increased in retinal tissue from days 5-12. Müller glial activation was observed in the HpODE injected area at day 5 followed by its remodeling and migration in the outer retina by day 20. RT-qPCR analysis further indicated upregulation of pro-inflammatory genes (TNF-α, IL-1ß and IL-6) both in retinal and RPE/choroidal tissue as early as day 2 and persisted until day 12. Upregulation of oxidative stress markers such as NADPH oxidase (NOX and DOUX family) was detected early in retinal tissue by day 2 followed by its upregulation in choroidal tissue at day 5. Neovascularization was demonstrated from day 12 to day 20 post HpODE injection in choroidal tissue. The results from this study indicate that subretinal HpODE induces advanced AMD phenotypes comprising many aspects of both dry/early and late) and neovascular/late AMD as observed in humans. Within 3 weeks via oxidative damage, upregulation of reactive oxygen species and pro-inflammatory genes, pro-apoptotic Bak and pro-angiogenic VEGF upregulation occurs leading to CNV formation. This experimental model of subretinal HpODE is an appropriate model for the study of AMD and provides an important platform for translational and basic research in developing new therapies particularly for early/dry AMD where currently no viable therapies are available.