RESUMEN
Timely intervention reduces the risk of a poor prognosis in hand eczema, making early recognition of symptoms important in high-risk professions. However, limited data exist regarding the ability of cleaners and healthcare workers to recognize hand eczema. The aim of this study was to examine cleaners' and healthcare workers' ability to recognize hand eczema in clinical photographs and to assess the severity of the disease. Cleaners and healthcare workers completed a questionnaire consisting of 16 questions and participated in a structured interview referring to a validated photographic severity guide for chronic hand eczema, which comprised clinical photographs of hand eczema at varying levels of severity. Eighty cleaners and 201 healthcare workers (total N = 281) participated in the study. The rates of correctly identified hand eczema in clinical photographs (cleaners/ healthcare workers) were: 41.2%/57.7% (mild hand eczema), 81.2%/92.0% (moderate hand eczema), 85.0%/94.5% (severe hand eczema) and 82.5%/97.0% (very severe hand eczema). The proficiency of healthcare workers in recognizing hand eczema was significantly higher than that of cleaners. The results indicate that a large proportion of cleaners and healthcare workers fail to recognize mild hand eczema in clinical photographs. Healthcare workers had higher success rates in recognizing hand eczema in all severity categories. Symptom underestimation may lead to under-reporting of the true prevalence of hand eczema, with consequent loss of opportunities for prevention.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Dermatosis de la Mano , Humanos , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Eccema/diagnóstico , Eccema/epidemiología , Personal de Salud , Fotograbar , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Dermatosis de la Mano/diagnóstico , Dermatosis de la Mano/epidemiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/prevención & controlAsunto(s)
Antioxidantes , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Pruebas del Parche , Goma , Humanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Antioxidantes/efectos adversos , Goma/efectos adversos , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Dermatosis de la Mano/inducido químicamente , Dermatosis de la Mano/etiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) is a prevalent, often chronic disease that poses a risk for job loss and decreased quality of life. In Germany, a multi-step prevention programme emphasising early detection and highly specialised multidisciplinary treatment has been implemented with great success. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of a Danish-adapted version of the German prevention effort on OCD severity, quality of life and occupational consequences at 3-month follow-up. METHODS: Randomised, controlled trial. Participants were recruited after the first referral from General Practitioner to Dermatologist with suspected OCD. The intervention group (IG) received a Danish-adapted, multidisciplinary intervention, while the control group (CG) navigated the Danish healthcare system without interference from the study. OCD severity, occupational consequences and quality of life were assessed at 3-month follow-up using self-reported questionnaires. RESULTS: A statistically significant decrease in the severity of eczema was found at 3-month follow-up in the IG compared to the CG. The IG were statistically significantly more likely to have seen a dermatologist at 3-month follow-up. Higher treatment level in the IG was indicated by the results but was not statistically significant. No significant difference was found in quality of life or occupational consequences. CONCLUSIONS: These initial findings suggest that early and specialised treatment of OCD improves OCD prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Humanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/prevención & control , Estudios de Seguimiento , Calidad de Vida , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dinamarca/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Insufficient knowledge about protection and care of the skin among Danish hospital cleaners, particularly immigrant cleaners, is guessed to be a widespread issue that can increase the likelihood of them developing occupational hand eczema (OHE). This study aimed to design and validate 10 pictograms and 10 short video clips showing recommendations for skin care that would help prevent OHE among professional cleaners. METHODS: Ten pictograms and 10 short, educational video clips, based on standard, recommended information were developed in collaboration with a medical illustrator and a video director. The materials were validated in a two-step process that included bus drivers (primary validation) and professional cleaners (secondary validation). RESULTS: During the primary validation, 5 of the 10 pictograms (50%) were comprehended correctly by at least 85%. Those that were misinterpreted, were modified and retested several times until they were understood correctly by at least 85%. During the secondary validation, all 10 pictograms achieved acceptable levels of comprehension among professional cleaners. All the video clips were comprehended correctly by both bus drivers and cleaners. CONCLUSION: Ten easy-to-understand pictograms and 10 educational video clips for cleaners about the prevention of OHE have been designed and validated.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Humanos , Comprensión , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Piel , Cuidados de la PielAsunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Personal Militar , Humanos , Adhesivos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/complicacionesRESUMEN
Objectives: To investigate the illness perceptions of patients with occupational skin diseases (OSDs). Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Specialised healthcare centre for inpatient and outpatient individual prevention in occupational dermatology in Germany. Participants: A total of 248 patients with hand eczema (55.2% female; average age: 48.5 years, SD: 11.9) were included in the final analyses. Measures: A modified and recently validated version of the 'Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire' (IPQ-R) was used to assess illness perceptions. Severity of skin disease was evaluated with the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), the Osnabrueck Hand Eczema Severity Index (OHSI), and a single, self-reported global item. The Erlangen Atopy Score (EAS) was used for atopy screening. Results: We found strong illness identity, high emotional impact, and long timeline beliefs, meaning that study participants perceive their OSD on the hands as a highly symptomatic, emotionally burdening, and chronic condition. Results suggest that hand eczema has a major impact on how participants manage their own lives, particularly during everyday life and occupational activities. Study participants predominantly identified irritant or sensitising substances and activities at work as well as skin protection regimes as causes of their disease. Conclusions: Healthcare workers should consider the illness perceptions as well as the disease burden of patients with an OSD on the hands in clinical practice. Multi-professional approaches to patient care should be sought. Illness perception in (occupational) dermatological patients should be the subject of further research.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Dermatosis de la Mano , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Estudios Transversales , Dermatosis de la Mano/diagnóstico , Dermatosis de la Mano/prevención & control , Dermatosis de la Mano/psicología , Atención a la Salud , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Beauticians, hairdressers, and barbers are among the occupations with the highest rates of work-related skin diseases, especially occupational contact dermatitis (OCD). Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) due to chronic mild trauma (frictional dermatitis), contact with soaps, detergents, and wet work is frequent in beauty operators. Para-phenylenediamine (PPD), acrylates, essential oils, fragrances, colophony, and preservatives are most frequently responsible for allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in these professional categories. Young women are mainly affected, with the most affected sites being the hands. Anamnesis, patch tests with the baseline, integrative series, and use products are important to understand possible sensitization. To reduce the risk, prevention is important, and workers should be adequately trained in the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Irritante , Dermatitis Profesional , Humanos , Femenino , Belleza , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Pruebas del ParcheRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This study aims to provide an overview on current knowledge on occupational allergic diseases in hairdressers and up-to-date perspectives of prevention. RECENT FINDINGS: Hand eczema (dermatitis) is common in hairdressers, often caused by contact allergy to one or multiple small molecules (haptens) used, e.g., for dyeing, bleaching, and waving/relaxing or by ancillary substances such as preservatives. Hairdressers, compared to other patch-tested patients, have an up to fivefold increased risk to be found sensitized, e.g., against p-phenylenediamine, ammonium persulfate, and glyceryl thioglycolate. Some of these small molecules may induce respiratory sensitization causing allergic rhinitis and/or asthma, notably persulfate salts. Occupational hazards in hairdressing are well described. This knowledge needs to be put into use for risk reduction, mainly by substitution of allergenic ingredients by less allergenic ones, education, and use of ventilation and suitable single-use gloves.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Tinturas para el Cabello , Preparaciones para el Cabello , Exposición Profesional , Humanos , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Tinturas para el Cabello/efectos adversos , Preparaciones para el Cabello/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/prevención & control , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence, risk factors, and prevention of occupational contact dermatitis (OCD), as well as risk factors and consequences of OCD among professional cleaners. METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was performed using Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies containing over 109.000 participants were included in the review. The prevalence of OCD varied between 2.2% and 30.1%. Main occupational risk factors for developing OCD among cleaners included wet work and irritants in cleaning products (bleach, chlorine, ammonia, multi-use-cleaning) and skin contact to metal. The most common contact allergies included rubber, biocides, nickel/cobalt, and perfumes. Other risk factors were inconsistent use of protective gloves and low educational level. Consequences associated with OCD included significant impairment in quality of life, tendency to have unscheduled absence from work, sick leave, increased rate of disability, and recognized degree of injury. Only one prevention study has been published investigating the effect of an educative course in skin-protective behavior in cleaners. The study reported a higher degree of knowledge of skin protection, a decrease in the severity of hand eczema, and a shift toward fewer daily hand washings at follow-up after 3 months. CONCLUSION: Our study proves that OCD is common in cleaners, and the main risk factors included wet work, irritants, and contact allergies, as well as inconsistent use of protective gloves and low educational level. More focus and a greater number of studies are needed on skin protection in this population.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Dermatosis de la Mano , Hipersensibilidad , Humanos , Irritantes , Prevalencia , Calidad de Vida , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/complicaciones , Dermatosis de la Mano/epidemiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/etiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk of developing hand eczema (HE). This can be exacerbated by hygiene measures related to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Using mild skin cleansers and emollients or moisturizers is central in the prevention of HE-especially with increased COVID-19 hygiene regimes. AIMS: This study aimed to assess parameters important for the acceptance of a skincare concept in HCWs. METHODS: In this proof-of-concept user trial, HCWs were provided ad libitum with hand wash oil and hand cream during the 6-month period, when occupationally acquired COVID-19 infections among HCWs were peaking in Germany and then surveyed about acceptance of the products using questionnaires. RESULTS: Of 135 HCWs, 115 (85%) responded. Skin tolerance of the hand wash oil and the hand cream was rated very good by 63% and 52% of the 115 participants, respectively. Of the 115 participants, 58% and 57% were very satisfied with the hand wash oil and the hand cream, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance of skin cleansing and skincare products in HCWs seems influenced by parameters such as self-assessed skin tolerance and self-reported overall satisfaction. It must be assumed that products are only used as recommended if they are well-accepted. Employers might survey employees about acceptance of products using the parameters identified to adjust concepts if necessary to sustainably contribute to the prevention of HE.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Alemania , Personal de Salud , Cuidados de la Piel , Prueba de Estudio ConceptualRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hand dermatitis (HD) is an inflammatory disorder of the hand. Agricultural industries (farming) have been reported as one of the leading occupation predisposing workers to health risks. Practices such as dumping cassava peels in farm environment, removal of heaps of peels, soaking of cassava and clearing of ditches have been identified as potentially harmful. These processes, which are wet works, are often done with bare hands predisposing cassava processors to HD. AIMS: This study aimed to determine the prevalence, predisposing factors and characteristics of HD amongst cassava processors in some rural communities in Southwest Nigeria. METHODOLOGY: This was a cross-sectional prospective study involving females engaged in farming and processing of raw cassava into 'garri' meal using the traditional methods. Four hundred and twenty-six female cassava processors were included. The questionnaire used was an adaptation of the Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire (NOSQ-2002) which is used to document work related skin diseases of the hand and forehand, and exposures to environmental factor. RESULTS: The mean age was 38.7 years and age range 13 - 70 years. Fifty-seven (13.4%) participants presented with HD within 12 months. Itching was the most common symptoms reported by 44 (10.3%) participants followed by pain 26 (6.1%) and small bumps 23 (4.9%) . The palmar surface of the right hand was most affected. None of the participants who use gloves regularly reported any symptoms of HD. CONCLUSION: Cassava processors have been shown to be at potential risk of occupational HD; hence, health education and use of protective materials are important measures for prevention.
CONTEXTE: La dermatite des mains (DH) est un trouble inflammatoire de la main. Les industries agricoles (agriculture) ont été signalées comme l'une des principales professions prédisposant les travailleurs à des risques pour la santé. Des pratiques telles que le déversement des épluchures de manioc dans l'environnement agricole, l'enlèvement des tas d'épluchures, le trempage du manioc et le curage des fossés ont été identifiées comme potentiellement dangereuses. Ces processus, qui sont des travaux humides, sont souvent effectués à mains nues, ce qui prédispose les transformateurs de manioc aux HD. OBJECTIFS: Cette étude visait à déterminer la prévalence, les facteurs de prédisposition et les caractéristiques de la DH chez les transformateurs de manioc dans certaines communautés rurales du sud-ouest du Nigeria. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Il s'agissait d'une étude transversale prospective impliquant des femmes engagées dans l'agriculture et la transformation du manioc brut en farine 'garri' en utilisant les méthodes traditionnelles. Le questionnaire utilisé était une adaptation du Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire (NOSQ-2002). RÉSULTATS: Quatre cent vingt-six femmes transformatrices de manioc ont été incluses. L'âge moyen était de 38,7 ans et la fourchette d'âge de 13 à 70 ans. Cinquante-sept (13,4 %) participantes ont présenté une DH dans les 12 mois. Les démangeaisons étaient les symptômes les plus courants rapportés par 44 participants, suivis par la douleur (26) et les petites bosses (23). La surface palmaire de la main droite était la plus touchée. Aucun des participants qui utilisent régulièrement des gants n'a signalé de symptômes de MH. CONCLUSION: Il a été démontré que les transformateurs de manioc sont exposés à un risque potentiel de MH professionnelle ; par conséquent, l'éducation sanitaire et l'utilisation de matériaux de protection sont des mesures importantes pour la prévention. Mots clés: Dermatite des mains, Manioc (garri), Agriculture, Profession, Transformateurs de manioc, Épluchures de manioc, Mains nues, Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire (NOSQ2002).
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Profesional , Manihot , Femenino , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Nigeria/epidemiología , Población Rural , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Prospectivos , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Compliance with glove use and safe work practices are important factors in primary prevention of occupational hand eczema (OHE) in hairdressers. OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk OHE and compliance with skin protective measures in hairdressers trained before and after implementation of a nationwide skin protection program in Danish hairdressing vocational schools in 2011. METHODS: A repeated cross-sectional study was performed. A questionnaire was sent in 2009 and 2020. The Danish Labour Market Supplementary Pension Scheme provided information on yearly payments from the hairdressing profession. RESULTS: A response rate of 66.6% (305/460) was obtained in the 2009 survey and of 29.9% (363/1215) in the 2020 survey. The career time prevalence of OHE decreased from 42.8% to 29.0% (adjusted odds ratio 0.55 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-0.77) and the incidence rate of OHE decreased from 57.5 (95%CI 48.4-68.4) to 42.0 (95%CI 34.6-50.9) per 1000 person years (incidence rate ratio 0.73 [95%CI 0.56-0.95] between the two surveys). A statistically significant (P < .05) increase in glove use when doing wet-work and when handling hair dyes, permanent wave solutions and bleaching products was observed in the 2020 compared to the 2009 survey. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that skin protection training during apprenticeship reduces the risk of OHE in hairdressers. The lack of primary prevention of OHE in hairdressing vocational schools may be a missed opportunity in the prevention of the disease.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Dermatosis de la Mano , Exposición Profesional , Humanos , Dermatosis de la Mano/epidemiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/prevención & control , Dermatosis de la Mano/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Eccema/epidemiología , Eccema/prevención & control , Eccema/complicaciones , Instituciones Académicas , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Occupational hand eczema (HE) is common among healthcare workers (HCWs) and has-in some regions of the world-increased during the COVID-19 pandemic due to related hygiene measures. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of an intervention for HE prevention in HCWs during the pandemic. METHODS: A prospective, controlled, unblinded interventional trial was conducted in 302 HCWs. The intervention group (IG) (n = 135) received online-based health education and free access to hand cleansing and hand care products. The control group (CG) (n = 167) did not receive any intervention within the study. At baseline (T0), after 3 (T1) and 6 (T2) months, participants completed standardized questionnaires. The Osnabrueck Hand Eczema Severity Index (OHSI) was assessed at T0 and T2. RESULTS: During the observation period, there were no new HE cases in the IG (n = 115) and 12 cases (8.8%) in the CG (n = 136). OHSI values at T2 were lower in the IG (b = -1.44, p < 0.001). Daily use of emollients was higher at work (b = 1.73, p < 0.001) and at home (b = 1.62, p < 0.001) in the IG at T2. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention was effective in HE prevention and improving skin care behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Dermatosis de la Mano , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Eccema/prevención & control , Eccema/epidemiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/prevención & control , Dermatosis de la Mano/epidemiología , Personal de Salud , Pandemias , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis involving the hands is a common occupational skin disease for hairdressers and the potent sensitizers p -phenylenediamine (PPD) and toluene-2,5-diamine (PTD) are associated with the development of occupational allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze whether the use of the moderate sensitizer 2-methoxymethyl-PPD (ME-PPD) in professional hair dyes is a suitable tool to reduce the occupational contact allergy risk for hairdressers. METHODS: Hand exposure of hairdressers (N = 11) to ME-PPD was analyzed under routine hair coloring conditions in commercial salons. By accounting for wet work and uneven hand exposure, the daily hand exposure was derived and compared with the occupational acceptable exposure level (AEL), that is, the sensitization induction threshold of ME-PPD adjusted for interindividual variability among workers. RESULTS: The daily hand exposure to ME-PPD was 1.6 µg/cm 2 , and the occupational AEL was 215 µg/cm 2 . The ratio of hand exposure to AEL was calculated as the margin of safety (MOS) against occupational sensitization. For ME-PPD, the MOS of 134 indicates a low likelihood of sensitization versus PPD and PTD with MOS values of 2.7 and 5.9, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data predict that the use of ME-PPD in professional hair color products improves the protection of hairdressers against hair dye-related contact allergy versus the use of PPD and PTD.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Tinturas para el Cabello , Exposición Profesional , Fenilendiaminas , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Tinturas para el Cabello/efectos adversos , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Fenilendiaminas/efectos adversos , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
In Germany, a stepwise multidisciplinary approach has been established to prevent occupational skin diseases (OSDs), primarily occupational contact dermatitis. This review aims to perform a systematic evaluation of the short- and long-term effects of the German secondary and tertiary individual prevention programmes (SIP and TIP, respectively) for OSDs. Primary outcomes were continuation of employment, severity of hand dermatitis, and quality of life (QoL). The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies reporting the effects of the SIP and TIP. A total of 19 studies encompassing 5527 patients with OSDs were included: 11 studies evaluated the SIP and 8 evaluated the TIP. Following the SIP, approximately 70% to 90% and 60% to 70% of patients remained in their occupation after 1 and 5 years, respectively. At 3 years after the TIP, 82.7% of patients remained in their occupation and exhibited a significant decrease in hand dermatitis severity, as well as an increase in QoL. Most of these studies were uncontrolled and the interventions, outcomes, and measurement instruments used were heterogeneous. The SIP and TIP lead to decreased disease severity, improved QoL, and enabled most patients to continue working in their chosen professions. Implementing a similar multidisciplinary approach across Europe may be beneficial.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Profesional , Prevención Secundaria , Prevención Terciaria , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Alemania , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Prevención Terciaria/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hand eczema (HE) is the most frequently occurring occupational skin disease. However, studies on non-occupational wet exposure, occupations not considered as high-risk, and socioeconomic factors regarding HE are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between HE and occupational and non-occupational wet exposure and work-related factors in the Dutch general population. METHODS: Within the Lifelines Cohort Study, participants with HE were identified by a digital, add-on questionnaire that included questions regarding exposure. Data on work-related and socioeconomic factors were collected from baseline. RESULTS: Overall, 57 046 participants (42.0%) were included. Occupational and non-occupational wet exposure were positively associated with HE in the past year (odds ratios (ORs) 1.35, [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22-1.49] and 1.34, [95%CI: 1.17-1.53], respectively). Positive associations for high-risk occupations (OR 1.20, [95%CI: 1.06-1.36] for personal care workers in health services and OR 1.25, [95%CI: 1.06-1.48] for nursing and midwifery professionals), occupations not considered as high-risk (OR 1.19, [95%CI: 1.03-1.39] for legal, social and religious associate professionals) and higher levels of education were found (OR 1.17, [95%CI: 1.04-1.32] and OR 1.18, [95%CI: 1.04-1.34] for middle and high level, respectively). CONCLUSION: Preventive strategies for HE should focus on avoidance of all wet exposure, regardless of origin. In addition, job tasks instead of job title should be taken into account. As previous results on the association between HE and socioeconomic factors differ, future research should focus on a uniform definition of socioeconomic status.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Dermatosis de la Mano , Exposición Profesional , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Eccema/epidemiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/epidemiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/etiología , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hairdressers are commonly affected by hand eczema (HE) due to skin hazardous exposure such as irritants and allergens in the work environment. OBJECTIVE: To give an overview of the current prevalence, incidence, and severity, as well as the pattern of debut and the contribution of atopic dermatitis on HE in hairdressers. METHODS: A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines was performed. Studies published from 2000 to April 2021 that fulfilled predefined eligibility criteria were retrieved. RESULTS: A pooled lifetime prevalence of 38.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 32.6-43.8), a pooled 1-year prevalence of 20.3% (95% CI 18.0-22.6), and a pooled point prevalence of 7.7% (95% CI 5.8-9.6) of HE was observed in hairdressers. The lifetime prevalence in fully trained hairdressers and hairdressing apprentices was almost identical. The pooled incidence rate of HE was 51.8 cases/1000 person-years (95% CI 42.6-61.0) and the pooled prevalence of atopic dermatitis was 18.1% (95% CI 13.6-22.5). CONCLUSION: HE is common in hairdressers and most hairdressers have debut during apprenticeship. The prevalence of atopic dermatitis in hairdressers is comparable with estimates in the general population, indicating that occupational exposures are the main factor in the increased prevalence of HE in hairdressers. This warrants a strategic and collective effort to prevent HE in hairdressers.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Dermatosis de la Mano , Exposición Profesional , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Eccema/epidemiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/epidemiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/etiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/prevención & control , Humanos , Incidencia , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hand eczema is one of the common occupational dermatoses, having high prevalence among healthcare professionals (HCP). We found no epidemiological data in the literature concerning the prevalence of hand eczema among HCP in Turkey. AIMS: The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of hand eczema among HCP in Turkey and to determine the demographic characteristics and risk factors that cause eczema. METHODS: A clinical assessment- and questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted with 734 HCP working in a tertiary hospital. Demographic characteristics and personal and occupational risk factors were evaluated in terms of the development of hand eczema. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 81.8%. The point prevalence of eczema was 27.6%, and the 12-month prevalence was 45.9%. Age, occupation, duration of work, atopic diseases, handwashing frequency, dry skin, moisturizing frequency, and presence and duration of glove use were important factors in the development of hand eczema. Powdered glove reaction was significantly higher in those with hand eczema (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of hand eczema is high among HCP in Turkey. Combining self-reported questionnaires with clinical examination findings can provide a more accurate calculation of the prevalence of hand eczema. The availability of epidemiological data on hand eczema can provide guidelines for the prevention and treatment of this condition. Except for situations requiring absolute handwashing, disinfecting hands with alcohol-based lotions and applying a powder-free policy in all healthcare centers will reduce the prevalence of hand eczema among HCP.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Dermatosis de la Mano , Estudios Transversales , Atención a la Salud , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Eccema/epidemiología , Eccema/etiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/epidemiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/etiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/prevención & control , Humanos , Prevalencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Turquía/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Conservadores Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Tiazoles/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Humanos , Pruebas del Parche , Prevalencia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Glove liners (GLs) made of cotton (COT) are worn under impermeable gloves to prevent occlusion effects. Semipermeable GLs made of Sympatex (SYM) might be an alternative. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the acceptance of GLs (COT/SYM) in health care workers (HCWs) with work-related skin diseases (WRSDs). METHODS: One hundred sixty-one HCWs with WRSDs were asked to wear GLs in combination with occlusive gloves for 10 ±2 weeks under workplace conditions. A questionnaire was applied to compare acceptance and usability of the respective glove combinations and previously used protective gloves (PUGs). RESULTS: A total of 120 data sets were available (SYM: n = 65, 77.4%; COT: n = 55, 71.4%). Both GLs provided a significantly lower sweating sensation, more pleasant climate, comfortable wearing experience, and moist or dry feeling on the skin compared to PUGs. SYM-GLs performed significantly better than COT-GLs regarding mobility of hands, sensitivity, and sense of touch. COT-GLs were significantly better than SYM-GLs in the categories fit, donning and doffing, and material contact. CONCLUSIONS: Both GLs did not impair work performance, were applicable in various areas of health care activities, and were preferred over PUGs. Our results indicate that SYM-GLs are an alternative to COT-GLs and thus may contribute to current prevention strategies.