Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 812
Filtrar
1.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 39(Supplement_2): ii18-ii25, 2024 Sep 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39235200

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, the uptake of peritoneal dialysis (PD) compared with hemodialysis remains limited. This study assessed organizational structures, availability, accessibility, affordability and quality of PD worldwide. METHODS: This cross-sectional study relied on data from kidney registries as well as survey data from stakeholders (clinicians, policymakers and advocates for people living with kidney disease) from countries affiliated with the International Society of Nephrology (ISN) from July to September 2022. RESULTS: Overall, 167 countries participated in the survey. PD was available in 79% of countries with a median global prevalence of 21.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.5-62.4] per million population (pmp). High-income countries (HICs) had an 80-fold higher prevalence of PD than low-income countries (LICs) (56.2 pmp vs 0.7 pmp). In 53% of countries, adults had greater PD access than children. Only 29% of countries used public funding (and free) reimbursement for PD with Oceania and South East Asia (6%), Africa (10%) and South Asia (14%) having the lowest proportions of countries in this category. Overall, the annual median cost of PD was US$18 959.2 (IQR US$10 891.4-US$31 013.8) with full private out-of-pocket payment in 4% of countries and the highest median cost in LICs (US$30 064.4) compared with other country income levels (e.g. HICs US$27 206.0). CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing large gaps and variability in the availability, access and affordability of PD across countries and world regions were observed. Of note, there is significant inequity in access to PD by children and for people in LICs.


Asunto(s)
Salud Global , Diálisis Peritoneal , Humanos , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Estudios Transversales , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1914, 2024 Jul 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39014360

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Understanding the trend of utilization of renal dialysis in Saudi Arabia (SA) is fundamental as it provides a general overview of renal care. The practice of renal dialysis assists in identifying challenges, opportunities, and potential areas for improvement in the provision of the services. OBJECTIVES: This research investigated the utilization of renal dialysis services in SA by exploring the number of renal dialysis centers, hemodialysis machines (HD), and peritoneodialysis patients. METHODS: The dataset for this study was derived from a collaboration between the General Authority of Statistics (GaStat) and the Ministry of Health (MoH), focusing on indicators for renal dialysis centers and patients across health sectors in 2021. Analysis was conducted using MS Excel 365 and IBM SPSS Version 29, incorporating multiple regression techniques. The health sector was treated as the dependent variable. At the same time, the number of hemodialysis (HD) machines and the counts of HD and peritoneal dialysis patients were considered independent variables. RESULTS: Around 275 renal dialysis centers, over 8000 HD machines, 20,440 HD patients, and 1,861 peritoneal patients were tallied from two resources. The findings revealed a negative relationship between the health sector and several renal dialysis centers and peritoneodialysis patients, as demonstrated by p < 0.05 in multiple regression analysis. CONCLUSION: The number of renal dialysis centers influences the availability of HD machines, affecting the number of HD and peritoneodialysis patients. Most national patients preferred MoH over other semi-governmental and private sectors, and vice versa for non-Saudis.


Asunto(s)
Diálisis Renal , Arabia Saudita , Humanos , Diálisis Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino
4.
Perit Dial Int ; 44(4): 229-232, 2024 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38826117

RESUMEN

Peritoneal dialysis utilisation in Indonesia decreased yearly from 6.6% in 2014 to 1.6% in 2018. Various efforts have been made by the government and the Indonesian Nephrologist Organization (PERNEFRI) through education and regulation to optimise the use of peritoneal dialysis, but have yet to succeed. The simplicity of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) made it worth considering as another solution to optimise peritoneal dialysis in Indonesia. Several advantages are offered by using APD, such as providing more time for activities compared to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, cheaper cost than haemodialysis and allowing remote monitoring. The advantages of APD make it a promising kidney replacement therapy (KRT) modality for developing countries like Indonesia, but the application is scarce. Some of the challenges in implementing APD in Indonesia include APD machines and fluids that are not available in the Indonesian market; the price of machines and fluids is still high; health workers are not familiar with APD; patients and their families not knowing APD as one of KRT; and APD machines distribution in archipelagic country is challenging.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Diálisis Peritoneal , Indonesia , Humanos , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Automatización
5.
Am J Nephrol ; 55(4): 472-476, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38815553

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PDAP) is a serious complication of peritoneal dialysis, associated with significant morbidity, modality transition, and mortality. Here, we provide an update on the national burden of this significant complication, highlighting trends in demographics, treatment practices, and in-hospital outcomes of PDAP from 2016 to 2020. METHODS: Utilizing a national all-payer dataset of hospitalizations in the USA, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of PDAP from 2016 to 2020. We analyzed demographic, clinical, and hospital-level data, focusing on in-hospital mortality, PD catheter removal, length of stay, and healthcare expenses. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates was employed to identify risk factors associated with adverse outcomes. RESULTS: There was a stable burden of annual PDAP admissions from 2016 to 2020. Healthcare expenditures associated with PDAP were high, totaling over USD 75,000 per admission. Additionally, our data suggest geographic inconsistencies in treatment patterns, with treatment at western and teaching hospitals associated with increased rates of catheter removal relative to northeastern and non-teaching centers and a mean cost of nearly USD 55,000 more in Western states compared to Midwest states. 23.2% of episodes resulted in the removal of the PD catheter. Risk factors associated with adverse outcomes included older age, higher Charlson comorbidity index scores, peripheral vascular disease, and the need for vasopressors. CONCLUSION: PDAP is a major cause of mortality among PD patients, and there is a vital need for future studies to examine the impact of hospital location and teaching status on PDAP outcomes, which can inform treatment practices and resource allocation.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Diálisis Peritoneal , Peritonitis , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Peritonitis/epidemiología , Peritonitis/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Riesgo , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Remoción de Dispositivos/economía , Remoción de Dispositivos/efectos adversos
8.
Am J Nephrol ; 55(3): 361-368, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38342081

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Rural areas face significant disparities in dialysis care compared to urban areas due to limited access to dialysis facilities, longer travel distances, and a shortage of healthcare professionals. The objective of this study was to conduct a national examination of rural-urban differences in quality of dialysis care offered across counties in the USA. METHODS: Data were gathered from Medicare-certified dialysis facilities in 2020 from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website. To identify high-need counties, county-level estimated crude prevalence of diabetes in adults was obtained from the 2022 CDC PLACES data portal. Our analysis reviewed 3,141 counties in the USA. The primary outcome measured was whether the county had a dialysis facility. Among those counties that had a dialysis facility, additional outcomes were the average star rating, whether peritoneal dialysis was offered, and whether home dialysis was offered. RESULTS: The type of services offered by dialysis facilities varied significantly, with peritoneal dialysis being the most commonly offered service (50.8%), followed by home hemodialysis (28.5%) and late-shift services (16.0%). These service availabilities are more prevalent in urban facilities than in rural facilities. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Five Star Quality ratings were quite different between urban and rural facilities, with 40.4% of rural facilities having a ranking of five, compared to 27.1% in urban. CONCLUSION: The majority of rural counties lack a single dialysis facility. Counties with high rates of chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and blood pressure, deemed high need, were less likely to have a highly rated dialysis facility. The findings can be used to further inform targeted efforts to increase diabetes educational programming and design appropriate interventions to those residing in rural communities and high-need counties who may need it the most.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Diálisis Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemodiálisis en el Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Diálisis Peritoneal/normas , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos
9.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 41: 114-122, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38325244

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the hospital service utilization patterns and direct healthcare hospital costs before and during peritoneal dialysis (PD) at home. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients with kidney failure (KF) was conducted at a Mexican Social Security Institute hospital for the year 2014. Cost categories included inpatient emergency room stays, inpatient services at internal medicine or surgery, and hospital PD. The study groups were (1) patients with KF before initiating home PD, (2) patients with less than 1 year of home PD (incident), and (3) patients with more than 1 year of home PD (prevalent). Costs were actualized to international dollars (Int$) 2023. RESULTS: We found that 53% of patients with KF used home PD services, 42% had not received any type of PD, and 5% had hospital dialysis while waiting for home PD. The estimated costs adjusting for age and sex were Int$5339 (95% CI 4680-9746) for patients without home PD, Int$17 556 (95% CI 15 314-19 789) for incident patients, and Int$7872 (95% CI 5994-9749) for prevalent patients; with significantly different averages for the 3 groups (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of services and cost is highest at the time of initiating PD, over time, using home PD leads to a significant reduction in use of hospital services, which translates into institutional cost savings. Our findings, especially considering the high rates of KF in Mexico, suggest a pressing need for interventions that can reduce healthcare costs at the beginning of renal replacement therapy.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Diálisis Peritoneal , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , México , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Renal/terapia , Insuficiencia Renal/economía , Insuficiencia Renal/epidemiología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemodiálisis en el Domicilio/economía , Hemodiálisis en el Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía
10.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0264340, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35192651

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The association between serum uric acid (SUA) and all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients is controversial. Therefore, we aimed to determine the relationship between SUA and all-cause and CVD mortality in PD patients. METHOD: Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from their inception to 7 April 2021. Effect estimates were presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and pooled using random effects model. RESULT: Thirteen cohort studies with 22418 patients were included in this systematic review, of which 9 were included in the meta-analysis. Before switching the reference group, pooled result for the highest SUA category was significantly greater than the median for all-cause mortality (HR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.37-4.26). After switching the reference group, the highest SUA category did not demonstrate an increased all-cause (HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.95-2.05) or CVD (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 0.72-2.34) mortality compared with the lowest SUA category. Dose-response analysis suggested a nonlinear association between SUA and all-cause mortality risk (Pnonlinearity = 0.002). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis didn't find the relationship between SUA levels and all-cause and CVD mortality risk in PD patients. More rigorously designed studies are warranted in the future.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Mortalidad/tendencias , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Ácido Úrico/sangre , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/sangre , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Humanos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/sangre , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia
11.
Trop Med Int Health ; 27(2): 199-206, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34873785

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a chronic disease that can adversely affect the patient's quality of life (QoL) in terms of functional limitation and cognitive impairment. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with QoL in patients with ESRD undergoing dialysis at a national hospital in Vietnam. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among outpatients aged ≥18 years who underwent haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) for at least 3 months at Thong Nhat Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam from May 2020 to July 2021. QoL was measured using the validated Vietnamese version of the EuroQol-5 Dimensional-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L). The factors associated with the QoL of patients with ESRD undergoing dialysis were identified using multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 131 (73.6%) and 47 (26.4%) patients underwent HD and PD, respectively. Overall, 178 (55.6%) patients were men (median age, 66 [56-79] years). The mean EQ-5D-5L score was significantly higher in patients undergoing PD than in those undergoing HD (0.848 ± 0.183 vs. 0.766 ± 0.231; p = 0.030). Older age (ß = -0.006; p < 0.001) and peptic ulcer disease (ß = -0.083; p = 0.029) were associated with lower QoL scores. PD treatment was associated with higher QoL scores (ß = 0.065; p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to improve the QoL of patients undergoing dialysis, especially of elderly patients and patients with peptic ulcer disease. PD may be a better method for maintenance dialysis, if applicable, in terms of QoL.


Asunto(s)
Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida , Diálisis Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vietnam/epidemiología
12.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 27(1): 74-81, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34392587

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Incremental peritoneal dialysis (PD) is recommended as a component of high-quality care by the international society for PD; however, its feasibility and clinical outcomes have not been widely reported. The aim of this study is to describe our experience with incremental PD. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of incident PD patients at Eastern Health between 2015 and 2019. Patients who stopped PD within 30 days were excluded. Incremental PD was defined in CAPD as using <8 L/day of exchange volume and in automated PD as dialysing without a last fill. Dialysis modality accorded with patient and physician preferences. RESULTS: The 96 patients were included in this study; 54 with incremental PD. Compared to full-dose PD, incremental PD patients were more likely to be female, had less comorbid diabetes (28% vs. 52%) and higher residual kidney function (RKF) (Kt/V 2.0 ± 0.7 vs. 1.4 ± 0.7). Age, BMI and starting eGFR did not differ between groups. Incremental PD exposed patients to lower exchange volumes (4.4 ± 2.1 vs. 8.5 ± 1.1 L/day), glucose load (46 ± 41 g/day vs. 119 ± 46) and was associated with a longer peritonitis-free survival. PD technique survival, rates of peritonitis or hospitalization were comparable between groups. Predictors for longer incremental PD use included older age and higher starting eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: Incremental PD is a feasible, goal-directed initial prescription in patients with RKF with comparable peritonitis rates and technique survival. Validation of this prescription in prospective studies is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Diálisis Peritoneal , Peritonitis , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Australia/epidemiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Pruebas de Función Renal/métodos , Pruebas de Función Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Peritoneal/métodos , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Peritonitis/diagnóstico , Peritonitis/epidemiología , Peritonitis/etiología , Peritonitis/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
Clin Nutr ; 40(11): 5620-5629, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34656960

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Frailty and body composition contribute to adverse pre-transplant outcomes including hospitalization and waitlist mortality, but the interaction between frailty and body composition remains uncertain. METHODS: Frailty was diagnosed by Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and a standard Frailty Questionnaire (FQ). Nutrition was evaluated by serum albumin level, subjective global assessment (SGA) and comprehensive malnutrition-inflammation score (MIS). Body composition was assessed by bioimpedance spectroscopy. All patients were followed up for three years. Primary outcome measure was a composite of death and permanent removal from waitlist. Secondary outcomes were emergency room attendance and hospitalization. RESULTS: 432 prevalent peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients were recruited. 148 (34.3%) were listed on transplant waitlist. Frailty, age and comorbidity load predicted waitlisting. With time, 47 patients were delisted. Frailty by FQ (p = 0.028), serum albumin level (p = 0.005) and waist circumference (p = 0.010) predicted delisting after adjustment for confounders. Frailty significantly interacted with lean tissue wasting (FQ: p = 0.002, CFS: p = 0.048), and MIS (FQ: p = 0.004; CFS: p = 0.014) on delisting. Lean tissue wasting caused 2.56 times risk of delisting among frail individuals identified by FQ (p = 0.016), while serum albumin and the presence of diabetes mellitus predicted the risk of delisting among non-frail individuals. Lean tissue wasted and frail subjects had a higher all-cause and infection-related hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Frailty predicted both kidney transplant waitlisting and subsequent delisting. Frailty interacted with body composition on transplant waitlist delisting. Lean tissue wasting and malnutrition independently predicted delisting in frail and non-frail listed subjects respectively.


Asunto(s)
Fragilidad/epidemiología , Trasplante de Riñón , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Listas de Espera , Síndrome Debilitante/epidemiología , Anciano , Composición Corporal , Impedancia Eléctrica , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Fragilidad/etiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Desnutrición/diagnóstico , Desnutrición/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación Nutricional , Estado Nutricional , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Albúmina Sérica/análisis , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Síndrome Debilitante/diagnóstico , Síndrome Debilitante/etiología
14.
G Ital Nefrol ; 38(3)2021 Jun 24.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34169689

RESUMEN

In the last year, the Italian National Health Service as a whole and the Nephrology community have been severely challenged by the pandemic. It has been a dramatic stress test for the entire healthcare system, not only in Italy but worldwide. The general organization of our Nephrology units and our models of care were put under extreme pressure, and we had to quickly adopt unprecedented clinical practice recommendations and organizational models to overcome the impasse caused by the pandemic. The time has come to evaluate these new experiences, ask how we could have been better prepared and look for change. In this editorial, we outline a few proposals and suggestions for the future, weighing the information gathered in the 2018 Nephrology Census against the new organizational requirements imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Nefrología/organización & administración , Pandemias , Censos , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Modelos Organizacionales , Nefrología/tendencias , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Diálisis Peritoneal Ambulatoria Continua/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/provisión & distribución , Diálisis Renal/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(22): e26209, 2021 Jun 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34087894

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is no published meta-analysis comparing the effects of dialysis modality choice on cognitive functions in patients with end-stage renal disease . Therefore, we perform a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate cognitive function in peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This protocol is conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol (PRISMA-P) statement guidelines. Related articles were identified by searching Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Wanfang Data, Medline, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library. The risk of bias assessment of the included articles was performed by two authors independently using the tool recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. All calculations were carried out with Stata 11.0 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom). RESULTS: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: We hypothesized that patients on peritoneal dialysis demonstrated a lower odd of cognitive dysfunction compared to those on hemodialysis. OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/NWCZK.


Asunto(s)
Cognición/fisiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/psicología , Diálisis Peritoneal/psicología , Diálisis Renal/psicología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Conducta de Elección/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Diálisis Peritoneal/métodos , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Diálisis Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Metaanálisis como Asunto
16.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 8203, 2021 04 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33859292

RESUMEN

Although patients with diabetes mellitus mostly present with enlarged or normal-sized kidneys throughout their life, a small proportion of patients have small kidneys. This longitudinal study enrolled 83 diabetic patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) between 2015 and 2019. Patients were stratified into two groups, those with enlarged or normal (n = 67) or small (n = 16) kidneys, based on their kidney sizes before dialysis. Patients with small kidney size were not only older (76.63 ± 10.63 vs. 68.03 ± 11.26 years, P = 0.007), suffered longer duration of diabetes mellitus (272.09 ± 305.09 vs. 151.44 ± 85.31 month, P = 0.006) and predominantly female (75.0 vs. 41.8%, P = 0.017), but also had lower serum levels of creatinine (9.63 ± 2.82 vs. 11.74 ± 3.32 mg/dL, P = 0.022) and albumin (3.23 ± 0.67 vs. 3.60 ± 0.47 g/dL, P = 0.010) than patients with enlarged or normal kidney size. At the end of analysis, 14 (16.9%) patients died. Patients with small kidney size demonstrated higher all-cause (50.0 vs. 9.0%, P < 0.001) and infection-related (43.8 vs. 7.5%, P < 0.001) mortality than patients with enlarged or normal kidney size. In a multivariate-logistic-regression model, small kidney size was a powerful predictor of mortality (odds ratio 6.452, 95% confidence interval 1.220-34.482, P = 0.028). Diabetic patients with small kidney size at the beginning of PD carry a substantial risk for mortality.


Asunto(s)
Nefropatías Diabéticas/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Riñón/patología , Diálisis Peritoneal , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Nefropatías Diabéticas/patología , Nefropatías Diabéticas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/patología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tamaño de los Órganos , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Taiwán/epidemiología
17.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(13): e25293, 2021 Apr 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33787616

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Data on the overall epidemiology and temporal trends of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis in Korea are scarce. We aimed to estimate the prevalence and incidence of ESRD requiring hemodialysis in Korea between 2002 and 2017.Using the National Health Insurance Service database, we analyzed data from the entire Korean population between 2002 and 2017. Hemodialysis patients were identified using rare incurable disease codes (V001) or prescription of medical fee codes of hemodialysis (O7020 and O7021). We only included patients who had been maintained on hemodialysis for more than 90 days from the date of dialysis initiation, to exclude patients who required short-term dialysis for acute kidney injury, conversion to peritoneal dialysis, or kidney transplantation.During the 16-year follow-up, the number of hemodialysis patients in Korea has steadily increased from 11,215 in 2002 to 67,486 in 2017. The mean age of these patients has gradually increased from 55.57 ±â€Š13.31 years in 2002 to 62.13 ±â€Š13.23 years in 2017. In 2017, the crude prevalence rate of hemodialysis was 1303.4 per million population. Overall, the number of men tended to be somewhat higher than that of women, and the proportion of men increased slightly from 55.56% in 2002 to 58.45% in 2017. The proportion of diabetic patients increased rapidly from 23.84% to 47.84%, and the percentage of dyslipidemic patients rose from 18.9% to 86.7%. The number of incident hemodialysis patients increased significantly from 4406 in 2003 to 12,134 in 2014, and then decreased to 8090 in 2017. In the incident cases of hemodialysis, the observed increase in the proportion of male patients and in diabetes and dyslipidemia were similar to that of prevalent patients. The more recent era of hemodialysis initiation, the better 5-year survival rates were observed.The prevalence and incidence of hemodialysis in Korea gradually increased between 2002 and 2017. The proportion of men, and patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia requiring hemodialysis also increased continuously. The survival rate of hemodialysis patients was gradually improving. These findings may serve as a reference for future epidemiological studies on hemodialysis in Korea.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Trasplante de Riñón/estadística & datos numéricos , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Diálisis Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , República de Corea/epidemiología , Distribución por Sexo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
18.
Clin Nephrol ; 96(1): 29-35, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33749580

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous insertion of a peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDc) is an alternative to open surgical techniques, and the anatomical characteristics of the abdominal wall may predict PDc dysfunction. We evaluated the role of rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) thickness as a predictor of PDc dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort of emergency-start PD patients (EmPD) who had their first percutaneous PDc insertion were included. PDc failure was defined as the removal of a PDc due to mechanical failure within the first 30 PD fluid exchanges. Clinical variables were recorded. The skin to parietal peritoneum depth and RAM thickness were determined by abdominal ultrasound. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were developed to test associations between clinical parameters and PDc dysfunction. RESULTS: Over 6 months, 119 patients underwent PDc insertion; 73 (61.3%) were males, with a mean age of 46.0 ± 17.8 years. The mean skin-to-peritoneum depth was 2.5 ± 1.0 cm, the RAM thickness was 0.91 ± 0.3 cm, and catheter implantation was successful in 116 (97.4%) patients. Insertion failed in 3 (2.5%) cases, and 30 (25.8%) patients presented with catheter dysfunction. Univariate analysis indicated that RAM thickness ≥ 1.0 cm, skin-to-peritoneum depth > 2.88 cm, abdominal waist > 92.5 cm, and skin-to-RAM fascia distance > 2.3 cm were associated with PDc dysfunction; in multivariate logistic regression analysis, only greater RAM thickness remained a significant predictor (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.38 - 1.88, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In EmPD patients, RAM thickness is associated with PDc dysfunction and could aid in identifying patients at risk for PDc dysfunction in emergency settings. Additional adequately powered studies are needed to confirm our findings.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo , Diálisis Peritoneal , Recto del Abdomen/anatomía & histología , Adulto , Anciano , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Cateterismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Catéteres , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Peritoneo/anatomía & histología , Estudios Prospectivos
19.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(3): e24195, 2021 Jan 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33546035

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: This study is to investigate the risk factors for the drop out from peritoneal dialysis.We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent catheterization between January 1, 2009 and September 30, 2019. The follow-up period ended on November 30, 2019. End point events were the cessation of peritoneal dialysis, including death, conversion to hemodialysis, and kidney transplantation. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze peritoneal dialysis curve. Significant factors were included in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Calibration curve was plotted.A total of 377 patients were included in this study. The dropout rate of peritoneal dialysis was 41.38%. The main drop out reason was conversion to hemodialysis, accounting for 41.67% of the total number of drop out, followed by kidney transplantation (28.21%) and death (25%). According to multivariable Cox proportional hazards model analysis, the medium education level (hazard ratio (HR): 2.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-5.91, P = .03), high education level (HR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.03-5.93, P = .04), diabetes (HR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.24-2.83, P < .03), hypertension (HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.64-3.51, P < .01), repeated peritonitis (HR: 5.18, 95% CI: 3.04-8.80, P < .01), and repeated chest complications (HR: 4.98, 95% CI: 2.79-8.89, P < .01) were independent risk factors for dropping out from peritoneal dialysis, while the number of hospitalizations after catheterization (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.89-0.98, P = .01) was protective factor for maintenance of peritoneal dialysis. The C index of the prediction model was 0.74.Higher education level, diabetes, hypertension, repeated peritonitis, and repeated chest complications were the risk factors of dropping out from peritoneal dialysis, while higher number of hospitalizations after catheterization was a protective factor for the maintenance of peritoneal dialysis. The nomogram could predict the probability of dropping out from peritoneal dialysis.


Asunto(s)
Nomogramas , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
20.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 3929, 2021 02 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33594123

RESUMEN

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) have been reported to have an increased risk of cancer. However, the epidemiological characteristics of cancer in ESKD patients remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the epidemiological characteristics of cancer in ESKD patients and the differences based on the renal replacement therapy provided. Data on ESKD patients were obtained from the South Korean nationwide cohort Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. This study included 58,831 eligible patients of the total 813,907 patients diagnosed with ESKD between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2017. Of the 58,831 ESKD patients, 3292 (5.6%) were newly diagnosed with cancer. The average duration between the diagnosis of ESKD and cancer was 3.3 ± 1.9 years (mean ± standard deviation), with no differences between hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplant groups. The most commonly observed cancer sites in ESKD patients were the colorectum, lung, and liver. The incidence of cancer increased progressively among patients undergoing kidney transplant, peritoneal dialysis, and hemodialysis in that order. Hemodialysis patients were found to have an increased risk of digestive tract cancer compared with kidney transplant patients (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.9; 95% confidence interval: 1.31-2.81; P < 0.001). The study findings may be a useful reference for cancer-screening guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Trasplante de Riñón/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...