Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 8.545
Filtrar
1.
J Diabetes Res ; 2024: 1610688, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751603

RESUMEN

Objective: This Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis aims to investigate the causal relationship between type 1 diabetes (T1D) and osteoporosis (OP). Methods: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with T1D were selected from the summary statistics of the genome-wide association study (GWAS) in European ancestry as instrumental variables (IVs) for univariable MR (UVMR) to explore the causal relationship between T1D and OP. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) was the primary method used to assess possible causality between T1D and OP. MR-PRESSO and MR-Egger intercepts were used to assess the horizontal pleiotropy of the IVs, and Q tests and the "leave-one-out" method were used to test for heterogeneity of MR results. Multivariable MR (MVMR) analysis was used to account for potential confounders such as smoking, obesity, drinking, and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentrations. Result: Inverse variance weighted estimates suggest T1D may increase risk of OP (UVMR: OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.10, p = 0.002) (MVMR: OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.07-1.90, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that T1D can increase the risk of OP.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Osteoporosis , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/genética , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Osteoporosis/genética , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Vitamina D/sangre , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados
2.
Croat Med J ; 65(2): 85-92, 2024 Apr 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706234

RESUMEN

AIM: To identify diabetic patients with a potential risk of developing diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in community pharmacies in Slovakia using a modified Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire (MNSIq-12). METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled 703 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus who had not been diagnosed with DPN. The study took place in selected community pharmacies across Slovakia in October 2019. The MNSIq-12 was administered by pharmacy students, and a Michigan score <1.5 was considered risky. The groups divided based on the Michigan score were compared in terms of duration of diabetes, age, body mass index (BMI), sex, weekly physical activity, level of education, and smoking. RESULTS: The risk of developing DPN was detected in 6.6% of respondents with type 1 diabetes and 13.4% with type 2 diabetes. Patients with both types of diabetes (38.2%; 67.0%) reported fatigue and heaviness in the legs as the most common clinical symptoms that may indicate the development of DPN. Those with a Michigan score <1.5 were older (P<0.0001), had a higher BMI (P<0.0001), a lower level of education (P=0.0020), and were less physically active (P<0.0001). Conclusion Approximately one-eighth of patients with diabetes who visited community pharmacies were potentially at risk for developing DPN. The modified MNSIq-12 was shown to be a simple, time-effective, and non-invasive indicative screening tool that can be applied in the environment of community pharmacies.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Humanos , Eslovaquia/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Neuropatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Farmacias/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Masa Corporal
3.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 349, 2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714923

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Contemporary estimates of diabetes mellitus (DM) rates in pregnancy are lacking in Canada. Accordingly, this study examined trends in the rates of type 1 (T1DM), type 2 (T2DM) and gestational (GDM) DM in Canada over a 15-year period, and selected adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: This study used repeated cross-sectional data from the Canadian Institute of Health Information (CIHI) hospitalization discharge abstract database (DAD). Maternal delivery records were linked to their respective birth records from 2006 to 2019. The prevalence of T1DM, T2DM and GDM were calculated, including relative changes over time, assessed by a Cochrane-Armitage test. Also assessed were differences between provinces and territories in the prevalence of DM. RESULTS: Over the 15-year study period, comprising 4,320,778 hospital deliveries in Canada, there was a statistically significant increase in the prevalence of GDM and T1DM and T2DM. Compared to pregnancies without DM, all pregnancies with any form of DM had higher rates of hypertension and Caesarian delivery, and also adverse infant outcomes, including major congenital anomalies, preterm birth and large-for-gestational age birthweight. CONCLUSION: Among 4.3 million pregnancies in Canada, there has been a rise in the prevalence of DM. T2DM and GDM are expected to increase further as more overweight women conceive in Canada.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Gestacional , Resultado del Embarazo , Embarazo en Diabéticas , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Canadá/epidemiología , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Adulto , Embarazo en Diabéticas/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién Nacido , Adulto Joven , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología
4.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1362584, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38774228

RESUMEN

Background: Previous observational studies have demonstrated a link between diabetes mellitus(DM) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Nevertheless, since these relationships might be confused, whether there is any causal connection or in which direction it exists is unclear. Our investigation aimed to identify the causal associations between DM and PBC. Methods: We acquired genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets for PBC, Type 1 diabetes(T1DM), and Type 2 diabetes(T2DM) from published GWASs. Inverse variance-weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median (WM), Simple mode, and weighted mode methods were used to determine the causal relationships between DM(T1DM or T2DM) and PBC. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out to ensure the results were robust. To determine the causal relationship between PBC and DM(T1DM or T2DM), we also used reverse MR analysis. Results: T1DM was associated with a higher risk of PBC (OR 1.1525; 95% CI 1.0612-1.2517; p = 0.0007) in the IVW method, but no evidence of a causal effect T2DM on PBC was found (OR 0.9905; 95% CI 0.8446-1.1616; p = 0.9071) in IVW. Results of the reverse MR analysis suggested genetic susceptibility that PBC was associated with an increased risk of T1DM (IVW: OR 1.1991; 95% CI 1.12-1.2838; p = 1.81E-07), but no evidence of a causal effect PBC on T2DM was found (IVW: OR 1.0101; 95% CI 0.9892-1.0315; p = 0.3420). Conclusion: The current study indicated that T1DM increased the risk of developing PBC and vice versa. There was no proof of a causal connection between PBC probability and T2DM. Our results require confirmation through additional replication in larger populations.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Cirrosis Hepática Biliar , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/genética , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/genética , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Cirrosis Hepática Biliar/genética , Cirrosis Hepática Biliar/epidemiología , Cirrosis Hepática Biliar/complicaciones , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Factores de Riesgo
5.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care ; 12(3)2024 May 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719508

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To study the HbA1c trajectory from the time of diagnosis to examine if patients at the greatest risk for severe microangiopathy can be identified early allowing clinicians to intervene as soon as possible to avoid complications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a population-based observational study, 447 patients diagnosed with type 1 diabetes before 35 years of age, 1983-1987, were followed from diagnosis until 2019. Mean HbA1c was calculated each year for each patient. Severe diabetic microangiopathy was defined as proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or macroalbuminuria (nephropathy). RESULTS: After 32 years, 27% had developed PDR and 8% macroalbuminuria. Patients with weighted HbA1c (wHbA1c); <57 mmol/mol; <7.4% did not develop PDR or macroalbuminuria. The HbA1c trajectories for patients developing PDR and macroalbuminuria follow separate courses early on and stay separated for 32 years during the follow-up. Patients without severe complications show an initial dip, after which HbA1c slowly increases. HbA1c in patients with severe complications directly rises to a high level within a few years. Mean HbA1c calculated for the period 5-8 years after diabetes onset strongly predicts the development of severe complications. Females with childhood-onset diabetes exhibit a high peak in HbA1c during adolescence associated with higher wHbA1c and higher prevalence of PDR. CONCLUSIONS: The HbA1c trajectory from diabetes onset shows that mean HbA1c for the period 5-8 years after diagnosis strongly predicts severe microangiopathy. Females with childhood-onset diabetes exhibit a high peak in HbA1c during adolescence associated with higher wHbA1c and a higher prevalence of PDR.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Angiopatías Diabéticas , Hemoglobina Glucada , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Adulto , Adolescente , Angiopatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Angiopatías Diabéticas/etiología , Adulto Joven , Estudios de Seguimiento , Niño , Retinopatía Diabética/epidemiología , Retinopatía Diabética/etiología , Pronóstico , Biomarcadores/sangre , Albuminuria/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Preescolar , Nefropatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Nefropatías Diabéticas/etiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
6.
J Diabetes Complications ; 38(6): 108761, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692039

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Population-based prevalence estimates of distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DPN) and diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) are scares. Here we present neuropathy estimates and describe their overlap in a large cohort of people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In a large population of outpatient participants, DPN was assessed using vibration perception threshold, sural nerve function, touch, pain and thermal sensation. Definite DPN was defined by the Toronto Consensus Criteria. Painful DPN was defined by Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions. DAN measures were: cardiovascular reflex tests, electrochemical skin conductance, and gastroparesis cardinal symptom index. RESULTS: We included 822 individuals with type 1 (mean age (±SD) 54 ± 16 years, median [IQR] diabetes duration 26 [15-40] years) and 899 with type 2 diabetes (mean age 67 ± 11 years, median diabetes duration 16 [11-22] years). Definite DPN was prevalent in 54 % and 68 %, and painful DPN was in 5 % and 15 % of type 1 and type 2 participants, respectively. The prevalence of DAN varied between 6 and 39 % for type 1 and 9-49 % for type 2 diabetes. DPN without other neuropathy was present in 45 % with T1D and 50 % with T2D. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of DPN and DAN was high. DPN and DAN co-existed in only 50 % of cases.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Humanos , Neuropatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Neuropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Prevalencia , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos
7.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 23(1): 152, 2024 May 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702680

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance and chronic kidney disease are both associated with increased coronary artery disease risk. Many formulae estimating glucose disposal rate in type 1 diabetes infer insulin sensitivity from clinical data. We compare associations and performance relative to traditional risk factors and kidney disease severity between three formulae estimating the glucose disposal rate and coronary artery disease in people with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: The baseline glucose disposal rate was estimated by three (Williams, Duca, and Januszewski) formulae in FinnDiane Study participants and related to subsequent incidence of coronary artery disease, by baseline kidney status. RESULTS: In 3517 adults with type 1 diabetes, during median (IQR) 19.3 (14.6, 21.4) years, 539 (15.3%) experienced a coronary artery disease event, with higher rates with worsening baseline kidney status. Correlations between the three formulae estimating the glucose disposal rate were weak, but the lowest quartile of each formula was associated with higher incidence of coronary artery disease. Importantly, only the glucose disposal rate estimation by Williams showed a linear association with coronary artery disease risk in all analyses. Of the three formulae, Williams was the strongest predictor of coronary artery disease. Only age and diabetes duration were stronger predictors. The strength of associations between estimated glucose disposal rate and CAD incidence varied by formula and kidney status. CONCLUSIONS: In type 1 diabetes, estimated glucose disposal rates are associated with subsequent coronary artery disease, modulated by kidney disease severity. Future research is merited regarding the clinical usefulness of estimating the glucose disposal rate as a coronary artery disease risk factor and potential therapeutic target.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Glucemia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Resistencia a la Insulina , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/sangre , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Glucemia/metabolismo , Biomarcadores/sangre , Finlandia/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Factores de Riesgo , Nefropatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Nefropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Pronóstico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/sangre , Riñón/fisiopatología , Insulina/sangre , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
8.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 23(1): 159, 2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715052

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In observational and experimental studies, diabetes has been reported as a protective factor for aortic dissection. 3-Hydroxybutyrate, a key constituent of ketone bodies, has been found to favor improvements in cardiovascular disease. However, whether the protective effect of diabetes on aortic dissection is mediated by 3-hydroxybutyrate is unclear. We aimed to investigate the causal effects of diabetes on the risk of aortic dissection and the mediating role of 3-hydroxybutyrate in them through two-step Mendelian randomization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a two-step Mendelian randomization to investigate the causal connections between diabetes, 3-hydroxybutyrate, and aortic dissection and calculate the mediating effect of 3-hydroxybutyrate. Publicly accessible data for Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes, dissection of aorta and 3-hydroxybutyrate were obtained from genome-wide association studies. The association between Type 1 diabetes and dissection of aorta, the association between Type 2 diabetes and dissection of aorta, and mediation effect of 3-hydroxybutyrate were carried out separately. RESULTS: The IVW method showed that Type 1 diabetes was negatively associated with the risk of aortic dissection (OR 0.912, 95% CI 0.836-0.995), The weighted median, simple mode and weighted mode method showed consistent results. The mediated proportion of 3-hydroxybutyrate on the relationship between Type 1 diabetes and dissection of aorta was 24.80% (95% CI 5.12-44.47%). The IVW method showed that Type 2 diabetes was negatively associated with the risk of aortic dissection (OR 0.763, 95% CI 0.607-0.960), The weighted median, simple mode and weighted mode method showed consistent results. 3-Hydroxybutyrate does not have causal mediation effect on the relationship between Type 2 diabetes and dissection of aorta. CONCLUSION: Mendelian randomization study revealed diabetes as a protective factor for dissection of aorta. The protective effect of type 1 diabetes on aortic dissection was partially mediated by 3-hydroxybutyrate, but type 2 diabetes was not 3-hydroxybutyrate mediated.


Asunto(s)
Ácido 3-Hidroxibutírico , Aneurisma de la Aorta , Disección Aórtica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Humanos , Disección Aórtica/genética , Disección Aórtica/epidemiología , Disección Aórtica/etiología , Ácido 3-Hidroxibutírico/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/genética , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Aneurisma de la Aorta/genética , Aneurisma de la Aorta/epidemiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/genética , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores Protectores , Fenotipo , Biomarcadores/sangre , Análisis de Mediación
9.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(10): e034741, 2024 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38761078

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate temporal trends in survival and subsequent cardiovascular events in a nationwide myocardial infarction population with and without diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2020, we identified 2527 individuals with type 1 diabetes, 48 321 individuals with type 2 diabetes and 243 170 individuals without diabetes with first myocardial infarction in national health care registries. Outcomes were trends in all-cause death after 30 and 365 days, cardiovascular death and major adverse cardiovascular events (ie, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, and heart failure hospitalization). Pseudo-observations were used to estimate the mortality risk, with 95% CIs, using linear regression, adjusted for age and sex. Individuals with type 1 diabetes were younger (62±12.2 years) and more often women (43.6%) compared with individuals with type 2 diabetes (75±10.8 years; women, 38.1%), and individuals without diabetes (73±13.2 years; women, 38.4%). Early death decreased in people without diabetes from 23.1% to 17.5%, (annual change -0.48% [95% CI, -0.52% to -0.44%]) and in people with type 2 diabetes from 22.6% to 19.3% (annual change, -0.33% [95% CI, -0.43% to -0.24%]), with no such significant trend in people with type 1 diabetes from 23.8% to 21.7% (annual change, -0.18% [95% CI, -0.53% to 0.17%]). Similar trends were observed with regard to 1-year death, cardiovascular death, and major adverse cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: During the past 15 years, the trend in survival and major adverse cardiovascular events in people with first myocardial infarction without diabetes and with type 2 diabetes have improved significantly. In contrast, a similar improvement was not seen in people with type 1 diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Infarto del Miocardio , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Causas de Muerte/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias
11.
Diabetes Care ; 47(6): 1032-1041, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38608262

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize high type 1 diabetes (T1D) genetic risk in a population where type 2 diabetes (T2D) predominates. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Characteristics typically associated with T1D were assessed in 109,594 Million Veteran Program participants with adult-onset diabetes, 2011-2021, who had T1D genetic risk scores (GRS) defined as low (0 to <45%), medium (45 to <90%), high (90 to <95%), or highest (≥95%). RESULTS: T1D characteristics increased progressively with higher genetic risk (P < 0.001 for trend). A GRS ≥90% was more common with diabetes diagnoses before age 40 years, but 95% of those participants were diagnosed at age ≥40 years, and their characteristics resembled those of individuals with T2D in mean age (64.3 years) and BMI (32.3 kg/m2). Compared with the low-risk group, the highest-risk group was more likely to have diabetic ketoacidosis (low GRS 0.9% vs. highest GRS 3.7%), hypoglycemia prompting emergency visits (3.7% vs. 5.8%), outpatient plasma glucose <50 mg/dL (7.5% vs. 13.4%), a shorter median time to start insulin (3.5 vs. 1.4 years), use of a T1D diagnostic code (16.3% vs. 28.1%), low C-peptide levels if tested (1.8% vs. 32.4%), and glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (6.9% vs. 45.2%), all P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics associated with T1D were increased with higher genetic risk, and especially with the top 10% of risk. However, the age and BMI of those participants resemble those of people with T2D, and a substantial proportion did not have diagnostic testing or use of T1D diagnostic codes. T1D genetic screening could be used to aid identification of adult-onset T1D in settings in which T2D predominates.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Veteranos , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/genética , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Adulto , Anciano , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/genética , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
12.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 23(1): 136, 2024 Apr 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664827

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As the retina is suggested to mirror the brain, we hypothesized that diabetic retinopathy and macular edema are indicative of stroke risk in type 1 diabetes and sought to assess this association in individuals with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: We included 1,268 adult FinnDiane Study participants with type 1 diabetes (age 38.7 ± 11.8 years, 51.7% men vs. 48.3% women, and 31.5% had diabetic kidney disease), data on baseline diabetic retinopathy severity, and first stroke during our observational follow-up. Retinopathy was graded by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale, and macular edema as clinically significant (CSME) or not. Strokes identified from registries were confirmed from medical files. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for stroke by retinopathy severity and CSME were calculated by Cox models adjusted for clinical confounders, including diabetic kidney disease. RESULTS: During median 18.0 (14.1-19.3) follow-up years, 130 strokes (96 ischemic, 34 hemorrhagic) occurred. With no-very mild (ETDRS 10-20) retinopathy as reference, the adjusted HR for stroke was 1.79 (95%CI 1.02-3.15) in non-proliferative (ETDRS 35-53), and 1.69 (1.02-2.82) in proliferative (ETDRS 61-85) retinopathy. Corresponding adjusted HR for ischemic stroke was 1.68 (0.91-3.10) in non-proliferative and 1.35 (0.77-2.36) in proliferative retinopathy. The adjusted HR for hemorrhagic stroke was 2.84 (0.66-12.28) in non-proliferative and 4.31 (1.16-16.10) in proliferative retinopathy. CSME did not increase HR for any stroke type after adjustment for clinical confounders (data not shown). CONCLUSIONS: Stroke incidence increases with the severity of diabetic retinopathy independently of comorbid conditions, including diabetic kidney disease.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Retinopatía Diabética , Edema Macular , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Retinopatía Diabética/epidemiología , Retinopatía Diabética/diagnóstico , Femenino , Masculino , Edema Macular/epidemiología , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Incidencia , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Finlandia/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Sistema de Registros , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Hemorrágico/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Hemorrágico/diagnóstico
13.
J Diabetes Complications ; 38(5): 108739, 2024 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38564971

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are considered at increased risk for cognitive impairment and accelerated brain aging. However, longitudinal data on cognitive impairment and dementia in this population are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with cognitive performance and cognitive impairment in a longitudinal sample of older adults with T1D. METHODS: We analyzed data collected as part of the Wireless Innovation for Seniors with Diabetes Mellitus (WISDM) Study, in which 22 endocrinology practices participated. Randomized participants with T1D ≥60 years of age who completed at least one cognitive assessment were included in this study (n = 203). Cognitive impairment was classified using published recommendations. RESULTS: Older age, male sex, non-private health insurance, worse daily functioning, diagnosis of neuropathy, and longer duration of diabetes were associated with worse cognitive performance, but not cognitive impairment. 49 % and 39 % of the sample met criteria for cognitive impairment at baseline and 52 weeks respectively. Of the participants that had data at both time points, 10 % were normal at baseline and impaired at 52 weeks and 22 % of participants (44 % of those classified with cognitive impairment at baseline) reverted to normal over 52 weeks. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that several demographic and clinical characteristics are associated with worse cognitive performance in older adults with T1D, but there were no associations between these characteristics and cognitive impairment defined by NIH Toolbox cognitive impairment criteria. Caution is warranted when assessing cognition in older adults with T1D, as a large percentage of those identified as having cognitive impairment at baseline reverted to normal after 52 weeks. There is need for future studies on the interrelationship of cognition and aging to better understand the effects of T1D on cognitive health, to improve clinical monitoring and help mitigate the risk of dementia in this population.


Asunto(s)
Cognición , Disfunción Cognitiva , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Humanos , Masculino , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Femenino , Anciano , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Longitudinales , Cognición/fisiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Envejecimiento/fisiología , Envejecimiento/psicología
14.
J Diabetes Complications ; 38(5): 108724, 2024 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615422

RESUMEN

AIMS: To evaluate the association between extrapolated time in range (eTIR), measured by self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants in pregnancies with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis including singleton pregnancies with T1D who started antenatal care before 20 gestational weeks and delivered live newborns at a Brazilian hospital between 2010 and 2019, with LGA fetuses as the main outcome. Glycemic records acquired using SMBG were categorized as eTIR, extrapolated time below range (eTBR), and extrapolated time above range (eTAR). Women were divided into two groups (LGA and adequate for gestational age [AGA]) and compared regarding clinical characteristics, obstetric outcomes, and frequencies of eTIR, eTBR, and eTAR. Logistic regression analysis verified the independent predictive variables for LGA infants. RESULTS: Data from 125 pregnancies were analyzed. For the first, second and third trimesters, each 1 % increase in eTIR was associated with a decreased risk of LGA by 2.9 % (OR: 0.971; 95%CI: 0.945-0.998), 2.5 % (OR: 0.975; 95%CI: 0.951-0.999) and 2.3 % (OR: 0.977; 95%CI: 0.955-0.998) and each 1 % increase in eTAR was associated with an increased risk of LGA by 2.7 % (OR: 1.027; 95%CI: 1.005-1.050), 3.9 % (OR: 1.039; 95%CI: 1.014-1.063) and 4.6 % (OR: 1.046; 95%CI: 1.018-1.075), respectively. CONCLUSION: The concept of TIR can be extrapolated to patients undergoing SMBG to assess the risk of LGA infants in pregnant women with T1D.


Asunto(s)
Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Macrosomía Fetal , Embarazo en Diabéticas , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Embarazo en Diabéticas/epidemiología , Embarazo en Diabéticas/sangre , Recién Nacido , Macrosomía Fetal/epidemiología , Edad Gestacional , Brasil/epidemiología , Glucemia/análisis , Glucemia/metabolismo , Peso al Nacer/fisiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
15.
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) ; 39(2): 239-254, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626908

RESUMEN

Precision diagnosis is the keystone of clinical medicine. In East Asians, classical type 1 diabetes is uncommon in patients with youngonset diabetes diagnosed before age of 40, in whom a family history, obesity, and beta-cell and kidney dysfunction are key features. Young-onset diabetes affects one in five Asian adults with diabetes in clinic settings; however, it is often misclassified, resulting in delayed or non-targeted treatment. Complex aetiologies, long disease duration, aggressive clinical course, and a lack of evidence-based guidelines have contributed to variable care standards and premature death in these young patients. The high burden of comorbidities, notably mental illness, highlights the numerous knowledge gaps related to this silent killer. The majority of adult patients with youngonset diabetes are managed as part of a heterogeneous population of patients with various ages of diagnosis. A multidisciplinary care team led by physicians with special interest in young-onset diabetes will help improve the precision of diagnosis and address their physical, mental, and behavioral health. To this end, payors, planners, and providers need to align and re-design the practice environment to gather data systematically during routine practice to elucidate the multicausality of young-onset diabetes, treat to multiple targets, and improve outcomes in these vulnerable individuals.


Asunto(s)
Edad de Inicio , Medicina de Precisión , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Adulto , Pueblo Asiatico , Asia Oriental/epidemiología , Pueblos del Este de Asia
16.
Bone ; 184: 117104, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636621

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We investigated the incidence rates of a subsequent hip fracture (HF) and other subsequent fractures than HF after first incident HF, comparing patients with and without diabetes. METHODS: Using Danish medical databases, we identified 92,600 incident HF patients in the period 2004-2018. Diabetes exposure was examined overall, by type of diabetes (T2D and T1D), and by presence of diabetes complications. We estimated cumulative incidence of subsequent HFs and fractures other than HF within two years of the incident HF. Using Cox regression, adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Among incident HF patients, 11,469 (12 %) had diabetes, of whom 10,253 (89 %) had T2D and 1216 (11 %) had T1D. The 2-year incidence rates for a new subsequent HF were 4.8 % (95 % CI: 4.6-4.9) for patients without diabetes (reference group), 4.1 % (95 % CI: 3.8-4.6) for T2D, and 4.3 % (95 % CI: 3.3-5.6) for T1D. Corresponding aHRs were 1.01 (95 % CI 0.90-1.14) for T2D and 1.17 (95 % CI 0.87-1.58) for T1D. There was effect modification by sex, as women with T1D had an aHR of 1.52 (95 % CI: 1.09-2.11) for subsequent HF, and by specific diabetes complications (for example, patients with T2D and prior hypoglycemia had an aHR of 1.75 (95 % CI: 1.24-2.42) for subsequent HF, while patients with T1D and neuropathy had an aHR of 1.73 (95 %: 1.09-2.75), when compared with patients without diabetes). For fractures other than HF, the 2-year incidence rates were 7.3 % (95 % CI: 7.2-7.5) for patients without diabetes, 6.6 % (95 % CI: 6.1-7.1) for T2D, and 8.5 % (95 % CI: 7.0-10.1) for T1D, with corresponding aHRs of 1.01 (95 % CI 0.92-1.11) for T2D and 1.43 (95 % CI: 1.16-1.78) for T1D. T2D was only a risk factor for other subsequent fractures among HF patients of high age (age 86-89 years: aHR 1.22 (95 % CI 0.99-1.55), age 90+ years: aHR 1.37 (95 % CI 1.08-1.74)), whereas T1D was robustly associated with increased risk of fractures other than HF in all subgroups. CONCLUSION: Among HF patients, we found no strong overall association of T2D or T1D with increased risk of subsequent HF, but diabetes patients with prior hypoglycemic events or neuropathy were at increased risk. In contrast, patients with T1D had a clearly increased risk of subsequent fractures other than HF.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera , Humanos , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Anciano , Incidencia , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios de Cohortes , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología
17.
Eur J Endocrinol ; 190(5): 391-400, 2024 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38679966

RESUMEN

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The prevalence and severity of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in type 1 diabetes remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence and severity of MASLD in type 1 diabetes and assessed which clinical features are most important in predicting MASLD severity. METHODS: A total of 453 individuals with type 1 diabetes (41.6 ± 15.0 years, 64% female, body mass index [BMI] 25.4 ± 4.2 kg/m2, and HbA1c 55.6 ± 12 mmol/mol) underwent vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), with a controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) score for steatosis (≥280.0 dB/m) and a liver stiffness measurement (LMS) for fibrosis (≥8.0 kPa). A machine learning Extra-Trees classification model was performed to assess the predictive power of the clinical features associated with type 1 diabetes with respect to steatosis and fibrosis. RESULTS: The prevalence of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis was 9.5% (95% CI, 6.8-12.2) and 3.5% (95% CI, 1.8-5.2). Higher LMS was associated with a longer duration of type 1 diabetes (median 30.5 [IQR 18.0-39.3] years vs 15.0 [IQR 6.0-27.0] years), and individuals were older, had a higher BMI (mean 27.8 ± 5.2 vs 25.3 ± 4.1 kg/m2), and a higher CAP score (mean 211.4 ± 51.7 dB/m vs 241.4 ± 75.6 dB/m). The most important predictive features of fibrosis were duration of type 1 diabetes, age, and systolic blood pressure, with a mean ± SD area under the curve of 0.73 ± 0.03. CONCLUSION: Individuals with type 1 diabetes and high blood pressure, older age, higher BMI, and longer duration of disease could be considered at high-risk for developing MASLD.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Hígado Graso , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Prevalencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hígado Graso/epidemiología , Hígado Graso/complicaciones , Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Índice de Masa Corporal , Cirrosis Hepática/epidemiología , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen
18.
Diabetes Care ; 47(6): 1065-1073, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640020

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in incidence of acute diabetes complications in individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes with and without severe mental illness (SMI) in Denmark by age and calendar year. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using nationwide registers from 1996 to 2020 to identify individuals with diabetes, ascertain SMI status (namely, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depression) and identify the outcomes: hospitalization for hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). We used Poisson regression to estimate incidence rates (IRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of recurrent hypoglycemia and DKA events by SMI, age, and calendar year, accounting for sex, diabetes duration, education, and country of origin. RESULTS: Among 433,609 individuals with diabetes, 8% had SMI. Risk of (first and subsequent) hypoglycemia events was higher for individuals with SMI than for those without SMI (for first hypoglycemia event, IRR: type 1 diabetes, 1.77 [95% CI 1.56-2.00]; type 2 diabetes, 1.64 [95% CI 1.55-1.74]). Individuals with schizophrenia were particularly at risk for recurrent hypoglycemia events. The risk of first DKA event was higher in individuals with SMI (for first DKA event, IRR: type 1 diabetes, 1.78 [95% CI 1.50-2.11]; type 2 diabetes, 1.85 [95% CI 1.64-2.09]). Except for DKA in the type 2 diabetes group, IR differences between individuals with and without SMI were highest in younger individuals (<50 years old) but stable across the calendar year. CONCLUSIONS: SMI is an important risk factor for acute diabetes complication and effective prevention is needed in this population, especially among the younger population and those with schizophrenia.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Cetoacidosis Diabética , Hospitalización , Hipoglucemia , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Cetoacidosis Diabética/epidemiología , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Masculino , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes
19.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care ; 12(2)2024 Apr 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575154

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To assess time trends in incidence, clinical characteristics, complications, and hospital outcomes among patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), with type 2 diabetes (T2D), and patients without diabetes who underwent kidney transplant (KT); to identify variables associated with in-hospital mortality (IHM); and to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used a nationwide discharge database to select KT recipients admitted to Spanish hospitals from 2016 to 2020. We stratified patients according to diabetes status. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify the variables associated with IHM. RESULTS: A total of 14 594 KTs were performed in Spain (T2D, 22.28%; T1D, 3.72%). The number of KTs rose between 2016 and 2019 and and decreased from 2019 to 2020 in all groups. In patients with T2D, the frequency of KT complications increased from 21.08% in 2016 to 34.17% in 2020 (p<0.001). Patients with T2D had significantly more comorbidity than patients with T1D and patients without diabetes (p<0.001). Patients with T1D experienced KT rejection significantly more frequently (8.09%) than patients with T2D (5.57%).COVID-19 was recorded in 26 out of the 2444 KTs performed in 2020, being found in 6 of the 39 patients deceased that year (15.38%) and in 0.83% of the survivors.The variables associated with IHM were comorbidity and complications of KT. The presence of T1D was associated with IHM (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.36 to 5.16) when patients without diabetes were the reference category. However, T2D was not associated with a higher IHM (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.2). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a decrease in the number of transplants. Patients with T1D have more rejection of the transplanted organ than patients with T2D. Fewer women with T2D undergo KT. The presence of T1D is a risk factor for IHM.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Femenino , Alta del Paciente , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Pandemias , Factores de Riesgo , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Hospitales
20.
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab ; 7(3): e473, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38597269

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous meta-analyses have shown mixed results regarding the association between eating disorders (EDs) and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Our paper aimed to analyse different EDs and disordered eating behaviours that may be practiced by patients with T1DM. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science was conducted on 17 January 2023, using the key terms "T1DM," "Eating Disorders" and "Bulimia." Only observational controlled studies were included. The Revman software (version 5.4) was used for the analysis. RESULTS: T1DM was associated with increased risk of ED compared with nondiabetic individuals (RR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.84-3.32, p-value < 0.00001), especially bulimia nervosa (RR = 2.80, 95% CI = 1.18-6.65, p-value = 0.02) and binge eating (RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.18-1.98, p-value = 0.001). Our analysis has shown that increased risk of ED among T1DM persisted regardless of the questionnaire used to diagnose ED; DM-validated questionnaires (RR = 2.80, 95% CI = 1.91-4.12, p-value < 0.00001) and generic questionnaires (RR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.27-3.23, p-value = 0.003). Prevalence of insulin omission/misuse was 10.3%; diabetic females demonstrated a significantly higher risk of insulin omission and insulin misuse than diabetic males. CONCLUSION: Our study establishes a significant and clear connection between EDs and T1DM, particularly bulimia and binge eating, with T1DM. Moreover, female diabetics are at higher risk of insulin misuse/omission. Early proactive screening is essential and tailored; comprehensive interventions combining diabetes and ED components are recommended for this population, with referral to a specialised psychiatrist.


Asunto(s)
Bulimia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Bulimia/complicaciones , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/complicaciones , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/epidemiología , Insulina , Insulina Regular Humana
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA