The type rather than the daily dose or number of antipsychotics affects the incidence of hyperglycemic progression.

There have been concerns that antipsychotics increase the incidence of hyperglycemic progression. Many factors have been suggested to contribute to the risk of antipsychotic-induced hyperglycemic progression, including the type, daily dose, and number of antipsychotics; however, few studies have examined these relationships. This study aimed to examine the affect of antipsychotic treatment-associated factors on hyperglycemic progression, after adjustment for the affect of background factors suggested to be associated with hyperglycemic progression. This was a nationwide, multicenter, prospective cohort study examining the incidence of hyperglycemic progression during a 12 mo period following the initiation of newly prescribed antipsychotic medication. Demographic data, medication history, and blood test values were collected from 631 study participants with normal blood glucose levels at baseline for 12 mo. The primary endpoint (incidence of hyperglycemic progression) was defined as progression from normal to prediabetic or probable diabetic status, and was evaluated based on the Japanese monitoring guidance in patients with schizophrenia. To further examine the affect of antipsychotics on glucose metabolism over time, we examined changes in HbA1c levels 3, 6, and 12 mo after the initiation of treatment with each antipsychotic. We found that treatment with zotepine and clozapine was associated with a significantly high incidence of hyperglycemic progression. Furthermore, changes in HbA1c levels 6 mo after the initiation of zotepine treatment were significantly higher than those following blonanserin and haloperidol treatments. In contrast, there was no significant difference in the change in total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and BMI during the same period. Moreover, the "daily dose" and "number" of antipsychotics did not show an association with the incidence of hyperglycemic progression. However, in a post hoc analysis in which the antipsychotics were divided into two groups according to the strength of blockade of H1, M1, M3, and 5-HT2C receptors, the incidence of hyperglycemic progression was higher in the medium- and high-daily dose groups than in the low-daily dose group in the antipsychotic group with strong blockade of these receptors. Our study indicated that the type of antipsychotic had a greater affect on the incidence of hyperglycemic progression than the daily dose of antipsychotics or their number. Among these, zotepine was most likely to increase the incidence of hyperglycemic progression, suggesting the need for caution when these antipsychotics are prescribed.

Neuraminidase inhibitors and single dose baloxavir are effective and safe in uncomplicated influenza: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Scarce evidence verifying the clinical impact of baloxavir on influenza complications is found. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched through December 2020. Randomized-controlled trials (RCT) that enrolled patients with laboratory-confirmed influenza receiving neuraminidase inhibitors (NAI) or baloxavir comparing to placebo were assessed. PROSPERO Registration-number: CRD42021226854. RESULTS: Twenty-one RCTs (11,697 patients) were included. Antiviral administration significantly reduced time to clinical resolution (mean difference: -21.3 hours) and total influenza-related complications (OR:0.55, 95%CI: 0.42-0.73). Specifically, antivirals significantly decreased bronchitis (OR:0.54, 95%CI: 0.38-0.75), sinusitis (OR:0.51, 95%CI: 0.33-0.78), acute otitis media (OR:0.48, 95%CI: 0.30-0.77), and antibiotic prescription (OR:0.62; 95%CI: 0.48-0.80). A positive trend favored antivirals administration to reduce pneumonia (OR:0.47, 95%CI: 0.16-1.33), or hospitalization rates (OR:0.65; 95%CI: 0.34-1.24) compared to placebo, but did not reach statistical significance. Adverse events (AE) were reported in 11%, 8.9%, and 5.1% of NAIs, placebo and baloxavir recipients, respectively. Compared with NAIs, administration of baloxavir showed non-significantly reduced AEs (OR:0.74, 95%CI: 0.53-1.04). CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose baloxavir and NAIs were superior to placebo to reduce complications in uncomplicated influenza, with 40% significant reduction in antibiotic prescription. Safety and efficacy of single-dose baloxavir were non-inferior to NAIs.

A Case of an Increase in Prothrombin Time-International Normalized Ratio by Interaction Between Warfarin and Baloxavir Marboxil in a Patient on Implantable Ventricular Assist Device.

BACKGROUND: Baloxavir marboxil (BM) is a novel drug with a cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitory action for influenza A or B; it is highly safe and requires just a single oral dose. Patients with severe heart failure use implantable ventricular assist device (iVAD) until transplantation, but they have an increased risk of thrombosis development. Their warfarin is administered based on point-of-care testing (POCT) with a strict control of prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR). CASE REPORT: Here, we report a case of a patient with iVAD whose PT-INR was significantly increased from the target range after BM administration. The patient was a 45-year-old man and transplanted with iVAD; warfarin treatment was started when his PT-INR target range was 3.0-3.5. At home, he frequently self-measured PT-INR by POCT and precisely controlled the warfarin dose. He had a fever, was diagnosed with influenza A and was administered BM 40 mg. Thereafter, his PT-INR continued to increase, reaching 4.8 on day 12 of BM administration, exceeding his target range; warfarin was skipped for 1 day. In this case, based on the history of BM administration and clinical course, the increase in PT-INR could be due to BM. Considering the interaction between warfarin and BM, we suspected a possibility of competition for protein-binding sites. Increased PT-INR in the patient was detected early by POCT and thus severe bleeding was avoided. CONCLUSION: Strict monitoring of PT-INR when using BM in patients taking warfarin is of clinical importance.

Clinical Outcomes and Plasma Concentrations of Baloxavir Marboxil and Favipiravir in COVID-19 Patients: An Exploratory Randomized, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective antiviral drugs for COVID-19 are still lacking. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and plasma concentrations of baloxavir acid and favipiravir in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Favipiravir and baloxavir acid were evaluated for their antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro before the trial initiation. We conducted an exploratory trial with 3 arms involving hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19. Patients were randomized assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio into baloxavir marboxil group, favipiravir group, and control group. The primary outcome was the percentage of subjects with viral negative by Day 14 and the time from randomization to clinical improvement. Virus load reduction, blood drug concentration and clinical presentation were also observed. The trial was registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR 2000029544). RESULTS: Baloxavir acid showed antiviral activity in vitro with the half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of 5.48 µM comparable to arbidol and lopinavir, but favipiravir didn't demonstrate significant antiviral activity up to 100 µM. Thirty patients were enrolled. The percentage of patients who turned viral negative after 14-day treatment was 70%, 77%, and 100% in the baloxavir marboxil, favipiravir, and control group respectively, with the medians of time from randomization to clinical improvement was 14, 14 and 15 days, respectively. One reason for the lack of virological effect and clinical benefits may be due to insufficient concentrations of these drugs relative to their antiviral activities. One of the limitations of this study is the time from symptom onset to randomization, especially in the baloxavir marboxil and control groups, which is higher than the favipiravir group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings could not prove a benefit of addition of either baloxavir marboxil or favipiravir under the trial dosages to the existing standard treatment.

Baloxavir Marboxil Single-dose Treatment in Influenza-infected Children: A Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy Trial (miniSTONE-2).

BACKGROUND: Baloxavir marboxil (baloxavir) is a novel, cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor that has previously demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of influenza in adults and adolescents. We assessed the safety and efficacy of baloxavir in otherwise healthy children with acute influenza. METHODS: MiniSTONE-2 (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03629184) was a double-blind, randomized, active controlled trial enrolling children 1-<12 years old with a clinical diagnosis of influenza. Children were randomized 2:1 to receive either a single dose of oral baloxavir or oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. The primary endpoint was incidence, severity and timing of adverse events (AEs); efficacy was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: In total, 173 children were randomized and dosed, 115 to the baloxavir group and 58 to the oseltamivir group. Characteristics of participants were similar between treatment groups. Overall, 122 AEs were reported in 84 (48.6%) children. Incidence of AEs was similar between baloxavir and oseltamivir groups (46.1% vs. 53.4%, respectively). The most common AEs were gastrointestinal (vomiting/diarrhea) in both groups [baloxavir: 12 children (10.4%); oseltamivir: 10 children (17.2%)]. No deaths, serious AEs or hospitalizations were reported. Median time (95% confidence interval) to alleviation of signs and symptoms of influenza was similar between groups: 138.1 (116.6-163.2) hours with baloxavir versus 150.0 (115.0-165.7) hours with oseltamivir. CONCLUSIONS: Oral baloxavir is well tolerated and effective at alleviating symptoms in otherwise healthy children with acute influenza. Baloxavir provides a new therapeutic option with a simple oral dosing regimen.

Safety and effectiveness of baloxavir marboxil for the treatment of influenza in Japanese clinical practice: A postmarketing surveillance of more than 3000 patients.

Baloxavir marboxil is an oral anti-influenza drug that inhibits the cap-dependent endonuclease of the virus polymerase acidic protein. In clinical trials, baloxavir reduced the time to alleviation of influenza symptoms and time to resolution of fever in adults, adolescents, and children. The purpose of this study is to collect data on the safety and effectiveness of baloxavir when used in clinical practice. This postmarketing surveillance (clinicaltrials.jp; JapicCTI-183882), conducted at 688 Japanese hospitals or clinics (March 2018 to March 2019), enrolled patients of any age with influenza A or B infection who received a single, weight-based dose of baloxavir. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were seen in 11.2% of 3094 patients during the 7-day observation period; the most common ADR was diarrhea (6.1%). ADRs were more common in children aged <12 years (14.1%) than in adults (10.0%). Almost all ADRs were non-serious (98.9%) and were recovered or recovering (96.7%). Median time to alleviation of symptoms (N = 2884) was 2.5 days (overall, influenza A, and influenza B groups). Median time to resolution of fever (N = 2946) was 1.5 days (overall, influenza A, and influenza B groups). Biphasic fever (increased temperature after previous fever resolution) was seen in 6.7% of patients overall and 28.6% of patients <6 years infected with influenza B, similar to rates published elsewhere with other influenza drugs and in untreated influenza. This postmarketing surveillance of >3000 patients suggests that baloxavir is well tolerated and effective regardless of patient age or influenza virus type.

Baloxavir Marboxil 2% Granules in Japanese Children With Influenza: An Open-label Phase 3 Study.

BACKGROUND: A granule formulation of baloxavir marboxil, a selective inhibitor of influenza cap-dependent endonuclease, was newly developed for children with difficulty swallowing tablets. METHODS: A multicenter open-label study was conducted during the 2017-2018 influenza season to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics and clinical/virologic outcomes of single, oral, weight-based doses of baloxavir granules in Japanese children infected with influenza virus. The primary clinical endpoint was the time to illness alleviation of influenza. RESULTS: All 33 enrolled children completed the study and received baloxavir (1 mg/kg for 12 children weighing <10 kg, 10 mg for 21 children weighing 10 to <20 kg). Detected viruses were influenza B (36.4%), A(H1N1)pdm09 (33.3%) and A(H3N2) (27.3%). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 54.5% of children. No deaths, serious AEs or AEs leading to discontinuation were reported. The mean (SD) plasma concentrations of baloxavir acid at 24 hours post-dose were 72.8 (24.0) and 51.3 (19.3) ng/mL in the 1-mg/kg and 10-mg dose groups, respectively. The median time to illness alleviation (95% confidence interval) was 45.3 (28.5-64.1) hours. A >4-log decrease in infectious viral titer occurred on day 2 and a temporary 2-log increase on day 4. Polymerase acidic protein/I38T/M-substituted viruses were detected in 5 children infected with influenza A, but none with influenza B. CONCLUSIONS: Baloxavir granules and the weight-based dose regimen were considered to be well tolerated in children, with rapid influenza virus reduction and associated symptom alleviation. Evidence of baloxavir activity against influenza B was observed, but further data are required for confirmation.

Early combination treatment with baloxavir and peramivir for hospitalized adults with influenza A in Yokohama, Japan.

Baloxavir marboxil is a new anti-influenza drug, but data on the clinical efficacy of a combination treatment of baloxavir and peramivir is scarce. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis comparing the mortality of a combination of baloxavir and peramivir (B & P, n = 10) and peramivir without baloxavir (P-mono, n = 132) in hospitalized adults with influenza A between 2011 and 2019 in Yokohama City, Japan. Sequencing analysis was conducted in the B & P group to check the I38 mutation in polymerase acidic protein which is associated with baloxavir resistance. The 30-day mortality rates were 0 (0%) in the B & P group and 6 (4.5%) in the P-mono group, respectively, which was not statistically significant. The I38 mutation was not detected before and after the combination treatment. A combination treatment of baloxavir and peramivir might be more effective than peramivir without baloxavir and prevent the emergence of baloxavir resistance in hospitalized adults with influenza A.

Enhanced Pharmacokinetic Activity of Zotepine via Nanostructured Lipid Carrier System in Wistar Rats for Oral Application.

BACKGROUND: Zotepine (ZT) is a substituted dibenzothiepine tricyclic molecule and second generation antipsychotic drug. It is available as the parenteral and oral solid dosage form, but, orally administered ZT has a poor oral bioavailability (10%) that might be due to either poor water solubility, high lipophilicity (Log P 4) and also first-pass hepatic metabolism. OBJECTIVE: The oral bioavailability of ZT was improved by loading into a nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) system. METHODS: Hot homogenization with probe sonication method was used for the preparation of ZT-NLCs formulations and characterized for an optimal system based on physicochemical characteristics and in vitro release. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) studies were used to confirm the crystalline nature and shape of the optimized ZT-NLC formulation. The physical stability of the optimized ZT-NLC formulation was evaluated at the refrigerator and room temperature over two months. Furthermore, in vivo pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of optimized ZT-NLC and ZT coarse suspension (ZT-CS) as control formulation, were conducted in male Wistar rats. RESULTS: The optimized formulation of ZT-NLC showed Z-avg, PDI, ZP of 145.8 ± 2.5 nm, 0.18 ± 0.05, -31.6 ± 1.8 mV, respectively. In vitro release studies indicated the sustained release of ZT. DSC and XRD studies revealed the conversion of ZT into an amorphous form. SEM studies showed the spherical shape of the ZT-NLC formulation. PK studies showed 1.8-folds improvement (p<0.05) in oral bioavailability when compared with ZTCS formulation. CONCLUSION: Overall, the results established that NLCs could be used as a new alternative delivery vehicle for the oral delivery of ZT.

Carryover effects of baloxavir acid in human nasopharyngeal/pharyngeal swabs on infectious titer testing of influenza virus.

Baloxavir marboxil (BXM) demonstrated a rapid and profound decline in infectious viral titer 1 day after BXM administration. Rapid reduction in virus titer is a characteristic of BXM. There may be a possibility that drug carryover effects have impacts on the observed antiviral effects due to the poor correlation that was observed between viral titer reduction and alleviation of influenza symptoms. Here, we report possible carryover effects of baloxavir acid (BXA), an active form of BXM, on infectious titer testing. Our findings indicate that there is little impact of BXA carryover on the infectious titer testing.

Baloxavir Marboxil Treatment of Nude Mice Infected With Influenza A Virus.

BACKGROUND: Immunocompromised patients infected with influenza virus require prolonged treatment with neuraminidase inhibitors, because these patients are not able to eradicate the virus from the respiratory tract, leading to the emergence of drug-resistant mutant viruses. METHODS: In this study, we examined the efficacy of baloxavir marboxil in nude mice that were immunologically deficient. RESULTS: Daily treatment with a suboptimal dose of baloxavir marboxil increased the survival time of the virus-infected nude mice but did not clear the virus from their respiratory organs, resulting in gradual body weight loss after termination of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the prolonged baloxavir marboxil treatment, few resistant mutants were detected.

Intranasal Zotepine Nanosuspension: intended for improved brain distribution in rats.

BACKGROUND: Zotepine (ZTP), an antipsychotic drug is well tolerated and particularly effective for treating negative symptoms of psychosis. But is limited by low oral bioavailability caused by substantial first pass metabolism and thereby less amount of drug reaches the brain due to blood brain barrier (BBB). OBJECTIVES: Since ZTP displays dose dependent side effects, purpose of the contemporary study is to develop zotepine loaded nanosuspension (ZTP-NS) for increased brain targeting in rats at lower doses. METHODS: ZTP-NS is prepared by two techniques viz., sonoprecipitation (SP) and combination technique (high pressure homogenization preceded by precipitation) by employing various stabilizers. Optimized ZTP-NS was characterized for particle size, solid state, morphology and solubility. In vitro drug release of ZTP and formulations was conducted using Franz diffusion cell. Stability study was performed at different temperature conditions. Pharmacokinetic study was performed in Wistar rats to determine the bioavailability and brain distribution of ZTP after intra-nasal (IN) and intravenous (IV) administration. Histopathology of brain was done after repeated administration of IN ZTP dispersion and NS up to 14 days. RESULTS: The optimized ZTP-NS formulated with Pluronic F-127 (0.3%w/v), Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose E15 (0.3%w/v) and soya lecithin (0.4%w/v) showed particle size of 519.26 ± 10.44 nm & 330.2 ± 12.90 nm and zeta potential of -21.7 ± 1.39 mV and - 18.26 ± 1.64 mV with sonoprecipitation and combination technique respectively. In vitro drug release was high (81.79 ± 3.23%) for ZTP-NS prepared by combination technique. Intranasal NS resulted in high brain concentrations of 8.6 fold (sonoprecipitation) and 10.79-fold hike in AUC0-24h in contrast to intravenous ZTP solution. Histopathology results reveal no significant changes in brain microscopic images. CONCLUSION: ZTP-NS was successfully developed, characterized and found that nanosuspension is a favorable approach for intranasal delivery of zotepine. Graphical abstract Graphical abstract representing zotepine drawbacks, nanosuspension preparation, characterization and pharmacokinetic study in rats.

Systematic development of design of experiments (DoE) optimised self-microemulsifying drug delivery system of Zotepine.

The aim of present investigation is to improve dissolution rate of poor soluble drug Zotepine by a self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS). Ternary phase diagram with oil (Oleic acid), surfactant (Tween 80) and co-surfactant (PEG 400) at apex were used to identify the efficient self-microemulsifying region. Box-Behnken design was implemented to study the influence of independent variables. Principal Component Analysis was used for scrutinising critical variables. The liquid SMEDDS were characterised for macroscopic evaluation, % Transmission, emulsification time and in vitro drug release studies. Optimised formulation OL1 was converted in to S-SMEDDS by using Aerosil® 200 as an adsorbent in the ratio of 3:1. The S-SMEDDS was characterised by SEM, DSC, globule size (152.1 nm), zeta-potential (-28.1 mV), % transmission study (98.75%), in vitro release (86.57%) at 30 min. The optimised solid SMEDDS formulation showed faster drug release properties as compared to conventional tablet of Zotepine.

An open-label, randomized, controlled trial of zotepine and risperidone for acutely ill, hospitalized, schizophrenic patients with symptoms of agitation.

Acutely ill, schizophrenic patients frequently require management of agitation. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of oral zotepine and risperidone in hospitalized, acutely ill schizophrenic patients with symptoms of agitation.This was a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, flexible dosing study. Thirty-nine patients with schizophrenia (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) who met the criteria of a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of greater than or equal to 60 points, PANSS-excitement component (EC) score of greater than or equal to 14 points, and at least 1 PANSS-EC score of greater than or equal to 4 were randomly assigned to either the zotepine or risperidone group. The primary outcome was a comparison of the change in the PANSS-EC total score from baseline to the end of the study between groups.There was no significant between-group difference in dropout rates (zotepine, 15.8% [3/19]; risperidone, 20.0% [4/20]). The mean (SD) daily dose of zotepine from baseline to study end point ranged from 127.6 (62.3) to 236.8 (74.2) mg/d; the corresponding values for risperidone ranged from 3.3 (1.6) to 4.8 (1.7) mg/d. There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics, PANSS total score, and PANSS-EC total score between the zotepine and risperidone groups at baseline. Both groups showed significant reductions in the PANSS-EC total scores (zotepine, -10.1 [4.7], P < 0.001; risperidone, -8.0 [5.3], P < 0.001) and PANSS total scores (zotepine, -34.7 [15.8], P < 0.001; risperidone, -28.6 [14.3], P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in PANSS-EC total score (P = 0.265) and PANSS total score (P = 0.125) changes from baseline to study end point between the 2 treatment groups. Serum uric acid and prolactin decreased more in the zotepine group than the risperidone group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.018, respectively).Zotepine seemed to be as effective as risperidone in treating hospitalized, acutely ill, schizophrenic patients with agitation, and had the advantages of lowering hyperuricemia and hyperprolactinemia. Double-blind, fixed dose studies with a larger sample size of acutely ill, schizophrenic patients with agitation are needed to confirm the study results.

Switching from clozapine to zotepine in patients with schizophrenia: a 12-week prospective, randomized, rater blind, and parallel study.

Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for patients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia, but many adverse effects are noted. Clinicians usually hesitate to switch from clozapine to other antipsychotics because of the risk of a re-emergence or worsening of the psychosis, although empirical studies are very limited. Zotepine, an atypical antipsychotic with a pharmacologic profile similar to clozapine, was found to be an effective treatment for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia in Japan. This 12-week study is the first prospective, randomized, and rater-blind study to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of switching from clozapine to zotepine. Fifty-nine patients with schizophrenia, who had taken clozapine for at least 6 months with a Clinical Global Impression-Severity score of at least 3, were randomly allocated to the zotepine and the clozapine groups. At the end of the study, 52 patients (88%) had completed the trial. The 7 withdrawal cases were all in the zotepine group. The final mean (SD) dose of zotepine and clozapine was 397.1 (75.7) versus 377.1 (62.5) mg/d, respectively. Patients in the zotepine group showed a significant increase in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale [mean (SD), 4.7 (8.7) vs -1.3 (6.3); P = 0.005], more general adverse effects as revealed by the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser Rating Scale [mean (SD), 1.74 (3.9) vs -0.2 (2.8); P = 0.039], more extrapyramidal adverse effects as demonstrated by the Simpson and Angus Scale [mean (SD), 1.29 (3.5) vs 0.17 (2.1); P = 0.022], an increased use of propranolol (37.1% vs 0%, P < 0.0001) and anticholinergics (25.7% vs 0%, P = 0.008), and an increased level of prolactin (29.6 vs -3.8 ng/ mL, P < 0.0005), compared with the clozapine group. The results suggested that switching from clozapine to zotepine treatment should be done with caution.

Optimizing the early prediction model for symptomatic remission with short-term treatment for schizophrenia.

Remission seems achievable for a portion of schizophrenic patients. This study aimed to identify the early predictors for remission and to establish an optimal prediction model. One hundred thirty-five acutely ill schizophrenic inpatients received 150-mg/d zotepine treatment for 4 weeks. Psychopathologic severity was assessed weekly using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Symptomatic remission was defined according to the consensus criteria proposed by Andreasen et al. Backward stepwise logistic regression model was used to obtain the early predictors. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the cutoff point of predictors. The study was conducted from June 2004 to April 2005. Twenty-one (21.0%) of 100 completers remitted after 4 weeks of treatment. The most influential predictors for ultimate remission were percentage of BPRS score reduction at week 2 and BPRS remission-items score at week 2. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score reduction at week 2 of 35% and BPRS remission-items score of 18 at week 2 seemed to be the optimal cutoff points. They provided a sensitivity of 62% and 84% and a specificity of 86% and 65%. Patients with less than a 35% BPRS score reduction and a BPRS remission-items score larger than 18 during the first 2 weeks of treatment were unlikely to reach a final remission. Whether the finding can be extrapolated to other validated assessment scales and other antipsychotics require further studies.