RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Oral forms of assessment remain a common part of competency-based assessment systems, yet their feasibility is being challenged. The focus on individual competence is problematic given the need to prepare health professionals for teamwork. The present study aimed to investigate how the assessment of collective competence compares to individual assessment, and to explore whether there is a need for individual assessment at all in community or population-based practice. METHODS: A behavioural-based interview assessment was developed and trialled and correlated to performance as a team on placement. Correlation between student performance on individual behavioural-based interview and teamwork artefacts was assessed using Spearman rho. Differences between performance on individual oral assessment and team performance on artefacts at the cohort level was determined using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Bland-Altman analysis was completed to analyse agreement between performance on the individual oral assessment and team performance at the student level. RESULTS: Students were final year nutrition and dietetics students from 2020, 2021 and 2022 years (total sample = 216) from one Australian university. There was a difference in performance between assessment types in each year and as a total cohort (p < 0.001) with students performing better in teamwork. There was no correlation between individual oral interview and team performance across all years. The results of the Bland-Altman analysis showed little agreement between the two assessment tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of teamwork performance as part of a program of assessment is essential. More valid and reliable tools are needed to assess collective competence.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Dietética , Humanos , Australia , Dietética/normas , Dietética/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Nutricionistas , AdultoRESUMEN
Malnutrition in older adults can decrease quality of life and increase risk of morbidities and mortality. Accurate and timely identification of malnutrition, as well as subsequent implementation of effective interventions, are essential to decrease poor outcomes associated with malnutrition in older adults. The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence Analysis Center conducted a systematic review of the literature to develop an evidence-based nutrition practice guideline for the prevention and treatment of malnutrition in older adults. The objective of this guideline was to provide evidence-based recommendations to identify, prevent, or treat protein-energy malnutrition in older adults (mean age ≥65 years) living in long-term care and community settings. This guideline provides 11 nutrition recommendations to inform shared decision making among dietitians, members of the health care team, family members or caregivers, and older adults living in long-term care or the community to prevent or treat malnutrition. Topics include dietitian effectiveness, nutrition assessment tools, oral nutrition supplements, food fortification, and home-delivered and congregate meals. Guideline implementation should include consideration of the importance of comprehensive individualized nutrition care for older adults. Future research is needed to address gaps that were identified related to the validity, reliability, and feasibility of nutrition assessment tools, as well as the effectiveness of dietitian interventions on outcomes of interest in older adults living in long-term care and the community.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Desnutrición , Evaluación Nutricional , Humanos , Anciano , Desnutrición/prevención & control , Desnutrición/terapia , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Terapia Nutricional/métodos , Terapia Nutricional/normas , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Vida Independiente , Masculino , Dietética/métodos , Dietética/normas , Estado Nutricional , Medicina Basada en la EvidenciaRESUMEN
AIM: To identify minimum reporting standards for assessing the processes and outcomes of Australian primary care dietetics practice. METHODS: A sequential, mixed-method, exploratory process with peer-nominated Australian 'thought leaders'. A literature review was undertaken to identify possible standards, followed by semi-structured qualitative interviews with thought leaders. Content analysis was used to identify a comprehensive group of items that could inform evidence-based reporting standards. Two rounds of a modified Delphi survey were conducted with the same thought leaders to seek consensus on the most relevant items. Individual items were analysed for content validity, and those with a rating of excellent item-content validity (index >0.78) were included as evidenced-based standards for primary care practice. RESULTS: Twenty-six thought leaders (response rate: 87%) from all mainland Australian states completed a qualitative interview and two rounds of modified-Delphi consensus surveys. Items were identified and categorised into three domains: business, clinical, and implementation. Content analysis identified 216 items published or used in practice by the thought leaders. After two rounds of consensus review, 97 items (45 business, 33 clinical, and 19 implementation) achieved excellent consensus ratings. Combining these items into a standardised tool, the scale-content validity index average was >0.90, which is considered excellent content validity. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified minimum reporting standards for evidence-based process and outcome assessments in primary care dietetics practice in Australia. Incorporating such standards into a standardised tool could enable benchmarking across the dietetics workforce and contribute to a broader understanding of the dietetic impact on public health.
Asunto(s)
Dietética , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Australia , Nutricionistas/normas , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Práctica Privada , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/normas , Técnica Delphi , Dietética/normas , Proyectos de Investigación/normasRESUMEN
This Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Position Paper reports current evidence on pediatric overweight and obesity prevention interventions and discusses implications for registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs). An overview of current systematic reviews provided evidence-based results from a range of nutrition interventions according to developmental age group (ages 2 to 5, 6 to 12, and 13 to 17 years). Twenty-one current systematic reviews of nutrition interventions demonstrated a beneficial effect of nutrition and physical activity interventions on body mass index measures and no adverse events were identified. RDNs impart nutrition expertise in a wide range of settings to provide comprehensive care for children and adolescents as their nutrition and developmental needs change over time. This Position Paper outlines the current roles of, and proposed directions for, RDNs engaged in pediatric overweight and obesity prevention. Prevention of pediatric overweight and obesity requires comprehensive strategies ranging from policy-level to individual-level interventions in settings that will have the most beneficial impact for children according to their developmental stage. This Position Paper advocates for increased availability of nutrition and food access programs and interventions to reduce risk of pediatric obesity and associated adverse health outcomes both now and for future generations.
Asunto(s)
Dietética/normas , Promoción de la Salud/normas , Obesidad Infantil/prevención & control , Prevención Primaria/normas , Academias e Institutos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Dietética/métodos , Femenino , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Política Nutricional , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Desarrollo de Programa , Revisiones Sistemáticas como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Quality improvement strategies have been widely applied in health care; however, little is known about their use in primary care dietetics. This review aims to describe and evaluate the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies that seek to improve patient outcomes by enhancing dietetic care compared to standard dietetic care. METHODS: The study employed a systematic review and meta-analysis design following PRISMA guidelines and included studies up to March 2021. Studies were included if they used a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design to evaluate the effect of a quality improvement strategy applied to care delivered by a dietitian on patient outcomes. A meta-analysis was conducted where there were sufficient studies with homogeneous populations and outcome measures. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs (n = 1604) met the inclusion criteria for review and five studies (n = 511) were eligible for meta-analysis for glycated haemoglobin in patients with type 2 diabetes. The most frequently reported quality improvement strategies addressed disease management programs (58%), patient education (67%), group care (42%) and patient self-management (42%). A positive intervention effect was reported in 50% of the included studies. A low grade of evidence supported a positive intervention effect for quality improvement intervention by a dietitian for glycated haemoglobin (pooled mean difference = -0.39% with 95% confidence interval = -0.70 to -0.08, p = 0.01) in n = 511 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions aimed at enhancing quality in primary care dietetic practice support improvements in patient outcomes. Further research on quality improvement interventions for patient outcomes is required to strengthen the evidence base in this important topic.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Dietética , Dietética/normas , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , AutomanejoRESUMEN
Management of food and nutrition systems (MFNS) encompasses the varied roles of registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) with administrative responsibilities for food and nutrition services within an organization. RDNs in MFNS are frequently employed in acute care, but also expand into a multitude of other settings in which management of nutrition and foodservice is required, for example, foodservice departments in assisted living and post-acute and long-term care; colleges and universities, kindergarten through grade 12 and pre-kindergarten schools and childcare; retail foodservice operations; correctional facilities; and companies that produce, distribute, and sell food products. RDNs in MFNS aim to create work environments that support high-quality customer-centered care and services, attract and retain talented staff, and foster an atmosphere of collaboration and innovation. The Management in Food and Nutrition Systems Dietetic Practice Group, with guidance from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Management Committee, has revised the Standards of Professional Performance (SOPP) for RDNs in MFNS for 3 levels of practice: competent, proficient, and expert. The SOPP describes 6 domains that focus on professional performance: Quality in Practice, Competence and Accountability, Provision of Services, Application of Research, Communication and Application of Knowledge, and Utilization and Management of Resources. Indicators outlined in the SOPP depict how these standards apply to practice. The standards and indicators for RDNs in MFNS are written with the leader in mind-to support an individual in a leadership role or who has leadership aspirations. The SOPP is intended to be used by RDNs for self-evaluation to assure competent professional practice.
Asunto(s)
Dietética/normas , Nutricionistas/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Gestión de la Práctica Profesional/normas , Competencia Profesional/normas , Alcance de la Práctica , Academias e Institutos , Servicios Dietéticos/organización & administración , Servicios Dietéticos/normas , Servicios de Alimentación/organización & administración , Servicios de Alimentación/normas , Humanos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , SociedadesRESUMEN
Plant-based diets, defined here as including both vegan and lacto-ovo-vegetarian diets, are growing in popularity throughout the Western world for various reasons, including concerns for human health and the health of the planet. Plant-based diets are more environmentally sustainable than meat-based diets and have a reduced environmental impact, including producing lower levels of greenhouse gas emissions. Dietary guidelines are normally formulated to enhance the health of society, reduce the risk of chronic diseases, and prevent nutritional deficiencies. We reviewed the scientific data on plant-based diets to summarize their preventative and therapeutic role in cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, obesity, and osteoporosis. Consuming plant-based diets is safe and effective for all stages of the life cycle, from pregnancy and lactation, to childhood, to old age. Plant-based diets, which are high in fiber and polyphenolics, are also associated with a diverse gut microbiota, producing metabolites that have anti-inflammatory functions that may help manage disease processes. Concerns about the adequate intake of a number of nutrients, including vitamin B12, calcium, vitamin D, iron, zinc, and omega-3 fats, are discussed. The use of fortified foods and/or supplements as well as appropriate food choices are outlined for each nutrient. Finally, guidelines are suggested for health professionals working with clients consuming plant-based diets.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/prevención & control , Dieta Vegana/normas , Dieta Vegetariana/normas , Dietética/normas , Política Nutricional , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Nutrition support is a therapy that crosses all ages, diseases, and conditions as health care practitioners strive to meet the nutritional requirements of individuals who are unable to meet nutritional and/or hydration needs with oral intake alone. Registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs), as integral members of the nutrition support team provide needed information, such as identification of malnutrition risk, macro- and micronutrient requirements, and type of nutrition support therapy (eg, enteral or parenteral), including the route (eg, nasogastric vs nasojejunal or tunneled catheter vs port). The Dietitians in Nutrition Support Dietetic Practice Group, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, along with the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Management Committee, have updated the Standards of Practice (SOP) and Standards of Professional Performance (SOPP) for RDNs working in nutrition support. The SOP and SOPP for RDNs in Nutrition Support provide indicators that describe the following 3 levels of practice: competent, proficient, and expert. The SOP uses the Nutrition Care Process and clinical workflow elements for delivering patient/client care. The SOPP describes the 6 domains that focus on professional performance. Specific indicators outlined in the SOP and SOPP depict how these standards apply to practice. The SOP and SOPP are complementary resources for RDNs and are intended to be used as a self-evaluation tool for assuring competent practice in nutrition support and for determining potential education and training needs for advancement to a higher practice level in a variety of settings.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Dietética/normas , Apoyo Nutricional/normas , Nutricionistas/normas , Academias e Institutos , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Nutrition in sports and human performance incorporates knowledge of the intersection of human physiology and nutrition. Registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) practitioners in sports and human performance focus on nutrition care that is specific to the individual and their sport/occupational requirements. The Dietitians in Sports, Cardiovascular and Wellness Dietetic Practice Group, along with the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Management Committee, have updated the Standards of Practice (SOP) and Standards of Professional Performance (SOPP) for RDNs working in sports and human performance. The SOP and SOPP for RDNs in Sports and Human Performance Nutrition provide indicators that describe three levels of practice: competent, proficient, and expert. The SOP uses the Nutrition Care Process and clinical workflow elements for delivering care to athletic/professional populations. The SOPP describes the following six domains that focus on professional performance: Quality in Practice, Competence and Accountability, Provision of Services, Application of Research, Communication and Application of Knowledge, and Utilization and Management of Resources. Specific indicators outlined in the SOP and SOPP depict how these standards apply to practice. The SOP and SOPP are complementary resources for RDNs and are intended to be used as a self-evaluation tool for assuring competent practice in sports and human performance and for determining potential education and training needs for advancement to a higher practice level in a variety of settings.
Asunto(s)
Rendimiento Atlético/normas , Competencia Clínica/normas , Dietética/normas , Terapia Nutricional/normas , Ciencias de la Nutrición y del Deporte/normas , Academias e Institutos , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Blogs are being used increasingly to disseminate nutrition information to consumers, including by registered dietitians (RDs). Guidelines in authoring blogs are important for dietetics professionals so that they effectively communicate evidence-based nutrition information in this format. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to obtain consensus from experts comprising RDs with active blog-writing experience on a set of guidelines for use by RDs when authoring a healthy eating or nutrition information blog. DESIGN: A modified e-Delphi technique with a consensus-based approach was used in this study undertaken between June and October 2019. The purpose-built, pilot-tested e-Delphi survey was informed by a literature review and included statements from 3 domains comprising blog readers and communication; purpose and healthy eating messages; and structure, voice, and tone. Expert participants were identified purposively and via snowballing. In each survey round, statements that achieved 80% consensus were accepted. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: A total of 19 experts consented to participate. Experts resided in the United States, Australia, and United Kingdom. Experts were mainly women aged between 30 and 49 years and working in private practice and/or research or teaching areas of nutrition and dietetics. RESULTS: Across 3 domains, a total of 33 statements were accepted, comprising a final set of guidelines named the P.O.S.T (purpose, community, structure, and tone) Guidelines for Nutrition Blogs. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus from a panel of dietetics experts resulted in the P.O.S.T Guidelines for Nutrition Blogs, which can support RDs in authoring healthy eating blogs. This will ensure that evidence-based nutrition messages provided to consumers are engaging and effective.
Asunto(s)
Blogging/normas , Información de Salud al Consumidor/normas , Dieta Saludable , Dietética/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adulto , Australia , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nutricionistas/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an important public health issue with increasing prevalence worldwide. Several clinical practice guidelines have been recently published regarding the nutritional management of CKD patients. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the quality of the published guidelines and provide recommendation for future updates. PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched for relevant guidelines and 11 clinical practice guidelines were finally included. Guidelines developed by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral nutrition (ASPEN), the Dietitians Association of Australia (DAA), the German Society for Nutritional Medicine (DGEM), the European Best Practice Guidelines (EBPG), the European Dialysis and Transplantation Nurses Association-European Renal Care Association (EDTNA-ERCA), the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), the Andalusian Group for Nutrition Reflection and Investigation (GARIN) group, the National Kidney foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI), the Italian Society of Nephrology-Association of Dieticians-Italian Association of Hemodialysis, Dialysis and Transplant (SIN-ANDID-ANED), and the Renal Association were assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool. Guidelines by KDOQI, ESPEN, and DAA were of moderate quality and the rest of them were low-quality guidelines. Our study demonstrates gaps related to the development of guidelines and therefore greater emphasis on methodological approaches is recommended. AGREE II tool can be useful to improve quality of guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Dietética/normas , Terapia Nutricional/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Research in clinical nutrition and dietetics consists of "carrying out intellectual and experimental activities in a systematic way with the purpose of increasing knowledge on this topic." The biomedical research carried out in clinical nutrition and dietetics units (UNCyDs) must be clinical-translational, which is understood as the fastest way to ensure that new scientific knowledge is transferred not only to clinical research but also to clinical practice. When UNCyDs conduct research, regardless of type and extent, they achieve higher quality standards in the health care they provide to their users. Clinical practice and scientific research are activities that constitute a continuous, indissoluble action. For this reason, both those responsible for health management and nutrition units and all their members have an obligation to promote research. In this article, a brief historical review of the birth of clinical nutrition as a scientific discipline is made, the legislation that supports biomedical research is briefly mentioned, the main keys to promote research in UNCyD are proposed, and finally orientation is offered on the main funding for biomedical research programs, and how to transfer and disseminate results.
INTRODUCCIÓN: Investigar en nutrición clínica y dietética consiste en "realizar actividades intelectuales y experimentales de modo sistemático con el propósito de aumentar los conocimientos de esta materia". La investigación biomédica que se realiza en las unidades de nutrición clínica y dietética (UNCyD) debe ser clínico-traslacional, entendida como la forma más rápida de conseguir que los nuevos conocimientos científicos se transfieran no solamente a la investigación clínica sino también a la práctica asistencial. Cuando las UNCyD realizan investigación, independientemente del tipo y la extensión, alcanzan mayores cotas de calidad en la atención sanitaria que prestan a sus usuarios. La práctica clínica y la investigación científica son actividades que constituyen una acción continuada e indisoluble. Por ello, tanto los responsables de las gerencias sanitarias como los de las unidades de nutrición y todos sus miembros tienen la obligación de fomentar la investigación. En el artículo se realiza un breve repaso histórico del nacimiento de la nutrición clínica como disciplina científica, se nombra someramente la legislación que sustenta la investigación biomédica, se proponen las principales claves para potenciar la investigación en las UNCyD y, por último, se orienta sobre las principales vías de financiación y sobre cómo realizar la transferencia y difusión de los resultados.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/normas , Dietética/normas , Servicio de Alimentación en Hospital/normas , Ciencias de la Nutrición/normas , Investigación Biomédica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , España , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/normasRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Eating disorders (EDs) are complex mental illnesses that require medical, psychological, and dietetic intervention to assist patients achieve recovery. OBJECTIVE: Available evidence was reviewed regarding dietetic intervention for adult outpatients with an ED and the quality of this evidence was assessed. DATA SOURCES: Systematic literature searches were conducted using 5 databases (MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO) for studies comparing adults with an ED receiving a dietetic intervention with those receiving a psychological intervention alone, those receiving a combined dietetic and psychological intervention, or a control group. DATA EXTRACTION: Literature searches returned 3078 results, with 10 articles reporting on 9 randomized controlled trials meeting the inclusion criteria. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. DATA ANALYSIS: GRADE assessments for studies involving individuals with anorexia nervosa indicated very low quality of evidence for outcomes including weight, ED psychopathology and ED behaviors , and no studies measured nutritional changes. For studies conducted with participants with bulimia nervosa or binge eating disorder, only 1 study included a group receiving combined evidence-based psychological and dietetic intervention. A combined intervention produced moderate-quality evidence for lower attrition, greater abstinence from ED behaviors, and more meals eaten per week in comparison with a stand-alone psychological or dietetic intervention. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently limited evidence to sufficiently assess the impact of incorporating dietetic interventions into outpatient treatment for adults with an ED; however, available evidence supports clinical practice guidelines that dietetic intervention should not be delivered as a stand-alone treatment. Additional methodologically sound studies in larger samples are required to fully inform dietetic treatment in EDs and incorporation of such interventions as part of a multidisciplinary treatment approach.
Asunto(s)
Dietética , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos , Adulto , Dietética/normas , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/terapia , HumanosRESUMEN
Improving and maintaining cardiometabolic health remains a major focus of health efforts for the pediatric population. Recent research contributes understanding of the systems-level nutrition factors influencing cardiometabolic health in pediatric individuals. This scoping review examines current evidence on interventions and exposures influencing pediatric cardiometabolic health to inform registered dietitian nutritionists working at each systems level, ranging from individual counseling to public policy. A literature search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Databases of Systematic Reviews, and other databases was conducted to identify evidence-based practice guidelines, systematic reviews, and position statements published in English from January 2017 until April 2020. Included studies addressed nutrition interventions or longitudinal exposures for participants 2 to 17 years of age who were healthy or had cardiometabolic risk factors. Studies were categorized according level of the social-ecological framework addressed. The databases and hand searches identified 2614 individual articles, and 169 articles were included in this scoping review, including 6 evidence-based practice guidelines, 141 systematic reviews, and 22 organization position statements. The highest density of systematic reviews focused on the effects of dietary intake (n = 58) and interventions with an individual child or family through counseling or education (n = 54). The least frequently examined levels of interventions or exposures were at the policy level (n = 12). Registered dietitian nutritionists can leverage this considerable body of recent systematic reviews to inform a systems-level, collaborative approach to prevention and treatment of pediatric cardiometabolic risk factors.
Asunto(s)
Dietética/métodos , Síndrome Metabólico/prevención & control , Terapia Nutricional/métodos , Obesidad Infantil/prevención & control , Pediatría/métodos , Adolescente , Factores de Riesgo Cardiometabólico , Niño , Consejo/métodos , Dietética/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Terapia Nutricional/normas , Pediatría/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Revisiones Sistemáticas como AsuntoRESUMEN
Recent evidence examining adults infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has indicated a significant impact of malnutrition on health outcomes. Individuals who have multiple comorbidities, are older adults, or who are malnourished, are at increased risk of being admitted to the intensive care unit and of mortality from COVID-19 infections. Therefore, nutrition care to identify and address malnutrition is critical in treating and preventing further adverse health outcomes from COVID-19 infection. This document provides guidance and practice considerations for registered dietitian nutritionists providing nutrition care for adults with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection in the hospital, outpatient, or home care settings. In addition, this document discusses and provides considerations for registered dietitian nutritionists working with individuals at risk of malnutrition secondary to food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Dietética/métodos , Desnutrición/terapia , Terapia Nutricional/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dietética/normas , Femenino , Inseguridad Alimentaria , Humanos , Masculino , Desnutrición/virología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Nutricional/normas , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The present study reports a case series where three adolescent patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) (two cases with typical AN and one case atypical AN) received nasogastric tube feeding under restraint in line with new dietetic clinical guidelines. METHODS: Three cases were chosen out of 61 admitted patients over the period of 1 year who were fed via a nasogastric tube under restraint in a specialist eating disorders unit for children and adolescents. These cases were chosen to highlight a range of clinical scenarios that clinicians may encounter. They also represent clinical scenarios where decisions to feed patients under restraint were rendered more complex by additional concerns. RESULTS: Despite the complexity of the cases, all patients tolerated the feeds well and were discharged home eating solid food. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to feed a patient against their will is never an easy one. Sadly, there have been some recent high-profile deaths of adult patients on medical wards where treatment opinion was not considered, and the patient received no or minimal nutrition when awaiting specialist treatment. Dietetic guidelines have been published to help inform clinicians for whom feeding under restraint may be out of the scope of their daily practice. This case series highlights clinical scenarios that illustrate the utility of the guidelines, which we hope will support clinicians when making, potentially lifesaving decisions in children and young people.
Asunto(s)
Anorexia Nerviosa/terapia , Dietética/normas , Nutrición Enteral/psicología , Intubación Gastrointestinal/psicología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adolescente , Salud del Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , MasculinoAsunto(s)
Auditoría Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Dietética/estadística & datos numéricos , Nutricionistas/estadística & datos numéricos , Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Comités Consultivos , Competencia Clínica/normas , Habilitación Profesional , Dietética/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Nutricionistas/normas , Práctica Profesional/normasRESUMEN
The 2020 update to KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Nutrition in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a result of the collaboration between the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy). The target population for this guideline is adults with stages 1 through 5 CKD who are not receiving dialysis, end-stage kidney disease including those on dialysis, and individuals with functional kidney transplant. The updated guideline includes 83 recommendations on important nutrition topics in CKD, including nutrition screening and assessment; medical nutrition therapy; dietary protein and energy intake; micronutrients; electrolytes; nutritional supplementation; and dietary patterns. Both Academy and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approaches were used to assess quality of evidence and rate the recommendation statements. Guideline recommendations were the result of a comprehensive systematic review, clinical expertise, and considerations for individualized care.