Exploring the impact of arginine-supplemented immunonutrition on length of stay in the intensive care unit: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Arginine-supplemented enteral immunonutrition has been designed to optimize outcomes in critical care patients. Existing formulas may be isocaloric and isoproteic, yet differ in L-arginine content, energy distribution, and in source and amount of many other specialized ingredients. The individual contributions of each may be difficult to pinpoint; however, all cumulate in the body's response to illness and injury. The study objective was to compare health outcomes between different immunonutrition formulas. METHODS: Real-world data from October 2015 -February 2019 in the PINC AI™ Healthcare Database (formerly the Premier Healthcare Database) was reviewed for patients with an intensive care unit (ICU) stay and ≥3 days exclusive use of either higher L-arginine formula (HAF), or lower L-arginine formula (LAF). Multivariable generalized linear model regression was used to check associations between formulas and ICU length of stay. RESULTS: 3,284 patients (74.5% surgical) were included from 21 hospitals, with 2,525 receiving HAF and 759 LAF. Inpatient mortality (19.4%) and surgical site infections (6.2%) were similar across groups. Median hospital stay of 17 days (IQR: 16) did not differ by immunonutrition formula. Median ICU stay was shorter for patients receiving HAF compared to LAF (10 vs 12 days; P<0.001). After adjusting for demographics, visit, severity of illness, and other clinical characteristics, associated regression-adjusted ICU length of stay for patients in the HAF group was 11% shorter [0.89 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.94; P<0.001)] compared to patients in the LAF group. Estimated adjusted mean ICU length of stay was 9.4 days (95% CI: 8.9, 10.0 days) for the HAF group compared to 10.6 days (95% CI: 9.9, 11.3 days) for the LAF group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite formulas being isocaloric and isoproteic, HAF use was associated with significantly reduced ICU length of stay, compared to LAF. Higher arginine immunonutrition formula may play a role in improving health outcomes in primarily surgical critically ill patients.

Impact of Immunonutrition on Nutritional Status in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

This study aimed to investigate the additional effects of perioperative immunonutrition (IMN) compared with preoperative immunonutrition (IMN) on anthropometric, nutritional, and biochemical parameters, hospital stay and postoperative complications in patients with colorectal cancer. Oral supplementation enriched with arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, and dietary nucleotides was given to 25 patients before and after the operation (Group 2); 25 patients received the same formula before surgery and standard isocaloric nutrition following the operation (Group 1). Postoperative body weight, body mass index (BMI), and middle upper arm circumference (MUAC) of Group 1 decreased more than Group 2 during follow-up (p < 0.05). The biochemical parameters, C-reactive protein (CRP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were higher, and albumin was lower than the baseline in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p < 0.05). There was a negative correlation between CRP and Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS) 2002 scores, and prealbumin and NRS 2002 scores had a positive correlation (p = 0.007, r = 0.384; p = 0.012, r = 0.352). There was no difference in hospital stay and postoperative complications between the groups (p > 0.05). Perioperative immunonutrition, compared to preoperative immunonutrition, can be used as a positive and effective approach in improving some anthropometric measurements and biochemical parameters in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

Pre-Operative Immunonutrition Enhances Postoperative Outcomes and Elevates Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Counts in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: This study (CRD42023464989) aimed to explore the effects of pre-operation immunonutrition on safety and immune related factors in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Wanfang databases to collect all clinical randomized controlled trials of the application of pre-operation immunonutrition for patients with colorectal cancer, published until July 2023. The primary outcomes were safety and immune related factors. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies were finally included. Preoperative immunonutrition could reduce the postoperative infection rate (risk ratio (RR) = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36, 0.88; p = .01), and wound infection rate (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.70; p < .001) in patients with colorectal cancer. For length of stay (mean difference (MD) = -1.10, 95% CI: -2.70, 0.49; p = .17), it was similar between groups. Meanwhile, patients in the pre-operation immune nutrition group also had significantly increased infiltrative lymphocytes CD16+ (MD = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.06; p < .001), and CD56+ (MD = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.06; p < .001) cells in the tumor tissues, compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: Immunonutrition intervention has the potential to reduce postoperative infectious complications and improve tumor infiltrative lymphocytes in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing surgery.

Effect of preoperative immunonutrition on postoperative short-term clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer cachexia: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although current guidelines(ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery and other guidelines) recommend preoperative immunonutrition for cachectic gastric cancer patients, the strength of the recommendation is weak, and the level of evidence is low. The benefits of preoperative immunonutrition still remain controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 112 patients with gastric cancer cachexia were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either preoperative enteral immunonutrition support (IN, n = 56) or standard enteral nutrition support (SEN, n = 56). The primary endpoint was the incidence of infectious complications, and the secondary endpoints included the nutritional indicators, inflammatory markers, immune parameters, postoperative recovery and complications and gastrointestinal intolerance reactions. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative infectious complications(P = 0.040) and overall complications (P = 0.049)was significantly lower in the IN group compared to the SEN group. In terms of laboratory inflammatory indexes, patients in the IN group demonstrated significantly lower levels of white blood cells (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin-6 (IL-6), as well as higher levels of lymphocytes (LYMPH) and immunoglobulin A (IgA), compared to patients in the SEN group, with statistically significant differences. In terms of clinical outcomes, the IN group had a shorter duration of antibiotic use (P = 0.048), shorter hospital stay (P = 0.018), and lower total hospital costs (P = 0.034) compared to the SEN group. The IN group also experienced significantly less weight loss after surgery (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Preoperative administration of immunonutrition formula has a positive impact on the incidence of infectious complications in patients with gastric cancer cachexia after surgery. It improves patients' inflammatory and immune status, shortens hospital stays, and reduces healthcare costs. Preoperative use of immunonutrition may contribute to the improvement of prognosis in this high-risk population.

Impact of Perioperative Immunonutrition on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

There is no consensus on the efficacy of perioperative immunonutrition in patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgery. We clarified the impact of perioperative immunonutrition on postoperative outcomes in patients with upper GI cancers. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science Core Selection, and Emcare from 1981-2022 using search terms related to immunonutrition and upper GI cancer. We included randomized controlled trials. Intervention was defined as immunonutritional therapy, including arginine, n-3 omega fatty acids, or glutamine during the perioperative period. The control was defined as standard nutritional therapy. The primary outcomes were infectious complications, defined as events with a Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ II that occurred within 30 days after surgery. After screening, 23 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and in the quantitative synthesis. The meta-analysis showed that immunonutrition reduced infectious complications (relative risk ratio: 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.92; certainty of evidence: Moderate) compared with standard nutritional therapy. In conclusion, nutritional intervention with perioperative immunonutrition in patients with upper GI cancers significantly reduced infectious complications. The effect of immunonutrition for upper GI cancers in reducing the risk of infectious complications was about 30%.

Edible insects as a source of biopeptides and their role in immunonutrition.

Many edible insect species are attracting the attention of the food industry and consumers in Western societies due to their high content and quality of protein, and consequently, the potential to be used as a more environmentally friendly dietary source could be beneficial for humans. On the other hand, prevention of inflammatory diseases using nutritional interventions is currently being proposed as a sustainable and cost-effective strategy to improve people's health. In this regard, finding bioactive compounds such as peptides with anti-inflammatory properties from sustainable sources (e.g., edible insects) is one area of particular interest, which might have a relevant role in immunonutrition. This review aims to summarize the recent literature on the discovery of immunomodulatory peptides through in vitro studies from edible insects, as well as to describe cell-based assays aiming to prove their bioactivity. On top of that, in vivo studies (i.e., animal and human), although scarce, have been mentioned in relation to the topic. In addition, the challenges and future perspectives related to edible-insect peptides and their role in immunonutrition are discussed. The amount of literature aiming to demonstrate the potential immunomodulatory activity of edible-insect peptides is scarce but promising. Different approaches have been employed, especially cell assays and animal studies employing insect meal as supplementation in the diet. Insects such as Tenebrio molitor or Gryllodes sigillatus are some of the most studied and have demonstrated to contain bioactive peptides. Further investigations, mostly with humans, are needed in order to clearly state that peptides from edible insects may contribute to the modulation of the immune system.

[Effectiveness of immunonutrition in the perioperative nutritional management of gastric cancer]. / Efectividad de la inmunonutrición en el manejo nutricional perioperatorio del cáncer gástrico.

Introduction: Objective: to assess the effectiveness of immunonutrition (IN) compared to standard nutritional formulas in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery. Material and methods: this is a real-life, observational retrospective cohort study. It included 134 patients, all of whom underwent gastrectomy at Montecelo Hospital between December 2019 and December 2022. Group A (N = 79 patients) received standard nutrition, and Group B (N = 55 patients) received formulas containing arginine, nucleotides, omega-3 fatty acids, and extra virgin olive oil. This protocol was carried out both pre and postoperatively for an average period of 10 days. The study evaluated hospital stay, the need for parenteral nutrition (PN), postoperative complications, as well as anthropometric and laboratory variables. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 16.1.® Results: in the IN group compared to the standard nutrition group, the hospital stay was reduced by 34 % (p < 0.001). The number of patients requiring PN decreased by 21.1 % (p = 0.022), and its duration also decreased by 33.2 % (p < 0.001). The risk of infectious complications was lower with IN, specifically 70.1 % less (p < 0.001). As for other postoperative complications, IN reduced the risk of intestinal obstruction by 84 % (p < 0.002), suture dehiscence by 90.9 % (p < 0.001), blood transfusion by 99.8 % (p < 0.001), pleural effusion by 90.9 % (p = 0.021), acute renal failure by 84.02 % (p = 0.047), and surgical re-intervention by 69.93 % (p < 0.011). In the IN group, there was less weight loss (p = 0.048) and a smaller decrease in postoperative albumin (p = 0.005) and cholesterol (p < 0.001). Conclusion: immunonutrition reduces postoperative complications, decreases hospital stay, and optimizes nutritional outcomes.

Introducción: Objetivo: valorar la efectividad de la inmunonutrición (IN) frente a las fórmulas nutricionales estándar en pacientes operados de cáncer gástrico. Material y métodos: se trata de un estudio de vida real, de tipo observacional, retrospectivo y de cohortes. Para este estudio se incluyeron 134 pacientes, todos ellos sometidos a gastrectomía en en el Hospital Montecelo, entre diciembre de 2019 y diciembre de 2022. El grupo A (N = 79 pacientes) recibió nutrición estándar y el grupo B (N = 55 pacientes) recibió fórmulas con arginina, nucleótidos, ácidos grasos omega-3 y aceite de oliva virgen extra. Este protocolo se ha realizado de forma pre y postoperatoria por un periodo medio de 10 días. Se evaluaron el tiempo de estancia hospitalaria, la necesidad de nutrición parenteral (NPT), las complicaciones postoperatorias y las variables antropométricas y analíticas. Los análisis estadísticos se realizaron con el programa Stata 16.1.® Resultados: en el grupo de IN respecto al grupo de nutrición estándar: la estancia hospitalaria se reduce un 34 % (p < 0,001). La cantidad de pacientes que precisan NPT se reduce un 21,1 % (p = 0,022) y su duración también se reduce un 33,2 % (p < 0,001). El riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas es menor con la IN, concretamente un 70,1 % menos (p < 0,001). En cuanto a las otras complicaciones postoperatorias, la IN disminuye el riesgo de oclusión intestinal en un 84 % (p < 0,002), la dehiscencia de suturas en un 90,9 % (p < 0,001), la transfusión sanguínea en un 99,8 % (p < 0,001), el derrame pleural en un 90,9 % (p = 0,021), la insuficiencia renal aguda en un 84,02 % (p = 0,047) y la reintervención quirúrgica en un 69,93 % (p < 0,011). En el grupo de IN se observa una menor pérdida ponderal (p = 0,048) y una menor disminución de la albúmina (p = 0,005) y el colesterol postoperatorios (p < 0,001). Conclusión: la inmunonutrición reduce las complicaciones postoperatorias, disminuye la estancia hospitalaria y optimiza los resultados nutricionales.

Comparison of enteral immunonutrition and enteral nutrition in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Enteral immunonutrition is a nutritional intervention that has been studied in postoperative patients with gastric cancer, but its effectiveness is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the effects of enteral immunonutrition and enteral nutrition on immune function in patients who undergo gastric cancer surgery. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge, and ClinicalTrials.gov from the inception of the review until 10 March 2023. Twelve studies were included for qualitative and quantitative analyses. RESULTS: We studied 1124 patients, including 565 patients in the enteral immunonutrition group and 559 in the enteral nutrition (controls) group. All included randomized, controlled trials were high quality. CD4+ levels, lymphocytes, transferrin concentrations, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome were not significantly different between the enteral immunonutrition and enteral nutrition groups. However, CD8+, immunoglobulins G and M, and proalbumin concentrations, CD4+/CD8+, and infectious complications were significantly higher in the enteral immunonutrition group than in the enteral nutrition group. A sensitivity analysis showed consistent results after excluding each study. Begg's test showed no publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral immunonutrition is an effective nutritional intervention that improves immune function in patients who have undergone gastric cancer surgery.

Preoperative Immunonutrition Significantly Reduced Surgical Site Infection After Urinary Diversion for Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Radical cystectomy and ileal conduit have a high incidence of surgical site infection. In this study, we evaluated the effects of preoperative immunonutrition on its incidence following these procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 86 patients who underwent radical cystectomy and ileal conduit at our hospital between 2014 October and 2021 July. They were sequentially divided into the Immunonutrition group (n = 43) and Control group (n = 43). Patients in the Immunonutrition group drank 4 packs of IMPACT (Nestle, Japan) per day for 5 days before surgery. IMPACT contains arginine and eicosapentaenoic acid. We compared levels of plasma arginine and eicosapentaenoic acid before and after surgery and the rate of surgical site infection between the groups. Factors related to surgical site infection were analyzed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in patient characteristics between the groups except for surgical operative method (P < .001) and transfusion (P = .009). Levels of plasma arginine and eicosapentaenoic acid were significantly increased the day before surgery in the immunonutrition group (P < .001). However, the levels of plasma arginine on the day after surgery did not vary significantly between the groups. The incidence of surgical site infection was significantly lower in the immunonutrition group (P = .014). Multivariate analyses showed a significant association of surgical site infection with immunonutrition (OR = 0.14, CI 0.03-0.72, P = .019) and with ASA classification (OR = 4.76, CI 1.23-18.40, P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative immunonutrition significantly reduced the incidence of surgical site infection following radical cystectomy and ileal conduit.

Mapping the landscape of immunonutrition and cancer research: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis on behalf of NutriOnc Research Group.

The ongoing global health challenge of cancer is driving the pursuit of innovative avenues for prevention, treatment, and enhanced outcomes. The convergence of nutrition and immune modulation, known as immunonutrition, is ready to act as a catalyst for transformative change in cancer research and therapy. Our study employs a bibliometric analysis to uncover the evolving trends within immunonutrition and cancer research across the past 25 years. Bibliometric data, including authors, journals, affiliations, and countries, were analyzed using the Bibliometrix R package. Clustering algorithms were applied to keywords to identify thematic areas and their evolution. A total of 489 documents were analyzed, showing an annual growth rate of 8.7%, with a collaboration index of 5.41, highlighting comprehensive multidisciplinary involvement within this landscape. Core authors demonstrated sustained productivity, while occasional authors indicated widespread interest. The Medical University of Warsaw led in institutional contributions. Country-wise, Italy, France, and the USA emerged as forerunners in fostering research productivity. Key journals like 'Clinical Nutrition' served as beacons, emphasizing the multidimensional nature of this topic. The analysis highlighted growing research output and several collaborations, indicating the importance of immunoenriched nutrition in cancer treatment. The interplay of core authors and diversified engagement harmoniously accentuates the cross-disciplinary nature of this burgeoning field. International collaboration facilitated knowledge exchange. Prominent documents shaped the field, emphasizing the significance of nutritional interventions. Thematic clusters revealed varied focuses, including pharmaconutrients, surgical approaches, inflammation, and specific cancers. The expanding research output suggests further development, particularly in exploring immunoenriched nutrition's impact on cancer types and patient populations. The multidisciplinary nature and international collaborations enhance the field's progress. Gaps in research underscore the need for original studies and personalized approaches. This study guides future research, informing evidence-based nutritional interventions and advancing cancer care practices.

Impact of Perioperative Immunonutrition on Postoperative Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Head and Neck or Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify whether perioperative immunonutrition is effective in adult patients with or without malnutrition undergoing elective surgery for head and neck (HAN) or gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. BACKGROUND: It is important to avoid postoperative complications in patients with cancer as they can compromise clinical outcomes. There is no consensus on the efficacy of perioperative immunonutrition in patients with or without malnutrition undergoing HAN or GI cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science Core Selection, and Emcare from 1981 to 2022 using search terms related to immunonutrition and HAN or GI cancer. We included randomized controlled trials. Intervention was defined as immunonutritional therapy including arginine, n-3 omega fatty acids, or glutamine during the perioperative period. The control was defined as standard nutritional therapy. The primary outcomes were total postoperative and infectious complications, defined as events with a Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ II that occurred within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: Of the 4825 patients from 48 included studies, 19 had upper GI cancer, 9 had lower, and 8 had mixed cancer, whereas 12 had HAN cancers. Immunonutrition reduced the total postoperative complications (relative risk ratio: 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66-0.93; certainty of evidence: high) and infectious complications (relative risk ratio: 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.82; certainty of evidence: high) compared with standard nutritional therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional intervention with perioperative immunonutrition in patients with HAN and GI cancers significantly reduced total postoperative complications and infectious complications.

[Immunonutrition and (its impact on) health. Micronutrients and debilitating factors]. / Inmunonutrición y (su impacto en la) salud. Micronutrientes y factores debilitantes.

Introduction: Introduction: the interaction between immunity and nutrition is complex and multifaceted. Micronutrients, including vitamins and minerals, are essential for immune function. In turn, immune function and lifestyle habits can affect nutritional needs and micronutrient utilization, creating an interdependence between nutrition and immunity that can be modulated by both external and internal factors. Objectives: to examine the relationship between micronutrient intake and immune function, and how debilitating factors such as aging, disease, and stress can impact this relationship. Methods: a review of scientific evidence and recommendations from major international scientific societies was conducted to identify the importance of micronutrients in immune function and how debilitating factors can alter their impact. Results: the effect of different micronutrients on immune function is described. Debilitating factors like aging, stress, and chronic diseases can compromise the immune system and make the body more susceptible to infections. However, adequate intake of micronutrients and healthy habits can help to strengthen immunity and mitigate the effects of these debilitating factors. Conclusion: immunonutrition is a critical component for maintaining a strong and healthy immune system. Sufficient intake of micronutrients and healthy lifestyle habits can help improve immunity, especially in the presence of debilitating factors.

Introducción: Introducción: la interacción entre la inmunidad y la nutrición es compleja y multifacética. Los micronutrientes, incluidos las vitaminas y los minerales, son esenciales para la función inmunológica. A su vez, la función inmunológica y los hábitos de vida pueden afectar las necesidades nutricionales y la utilización de micronutrientes, creando una interdependencia entre la nutrición y la inmunidad que puede ser modulada por factores externos e internos. Objetivos: examinar la relación entre la ingesta de micronutrientes y la función inmunológica y cómo factores debilitantes, como el envejecimiento, la enfermedad y el estrés, pueden afectar esta relación. Métodos: se realizó una revisión de la evidencia científica y de las recomendaciones de las principales sociedades científicas internacionales para identificar la importancia de los micronutrientes en la función inmunológica y cómo los factores debilitantes pueden alterar su impacto. Resultados: se describe el efecto de diferentes micronutrientes sobre la función inmunológica. Los factores debilitantes como el envejecimiento, el estrés y las enfermedades crónicas pueden comprometer el sistema inmunológico y hacer que el cuerpo sea más susceptible a las infecciones. Sin embargo, una ingesta adecuada de micronutrientes y unos hábitos saludables pueden ayudar a fortalecer la inmunidad y mitigar los efectos de estos factores debilitantes. Conclusión: la nutrición inmunológica es un componente crítico para mantener un sistema inmunológico fuerte y saludable. Una ingesta suficiente de micronutrientes y unos hábitos de vida saludables pueden ayudar a mejorar la inmunidad, especialmente en presencia de factores debilitantes.

Perioperative Enteral Immunonutrition Support for the Immune Function and Intestinal Mucosal Barrier in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: The impact of perioperative immunonutrition on patients undergoing radical gastrectomy remains undetermined. This study aimed to assess the influence of enteral immunonutrition support on postoperative immune function and intestinal mucosal barrier function following radical gastrectomy, contrasting findings with a control group to furnish evidence for perioperative enteral nutrition support. METHODS: In this prospective randomized trial, 65 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy between June 2022 and June 2023 were included. Participants were allocated to either the study group (receiving enteral immunonutrition) or the control group (not receiving enteral immunonutrition). We compared postoperative rehabilitation and complications between the groups, analyzed the intestinal mucosal barrier function markers on the 3rd and 7th postoperative days, and delved deeper into peripheral blood cell immunity, inflammation, and nutritional indicators. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 30 patients in the study group and 35 in the control group, with no significant differences in demographic attributes between the two groups. On the 3rd postoperative day, the diamine oxidase, D-lactic acid, and endotoxin levels in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (p = 0.029, p = 0.044, and p = 0.010, respectively). By the 7th postoperative day, these levels continued to be significantly diminished in the study group (p = 0.013, p = 0.033, and p = 0.004, respectively). The times to first flatus (p = 0.012) and first bowel movement (p = 0.012) were significantly shorter in the study group. Moreover, postoperative complications in the study group were fewer than in the control group (p = 0.039). On the 7th postoperative day, the study group had lower peripheral white blood cell (WBC) levels (p = 0.020) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios (NLR) (p = 0.031), but displayed elevated albumin levels (p = 0.006). One month post-surgery, the CD4+T and CD8+T counts were significantly greater in the study group (p = 0.003 and p = 0.012, respectively). Correlation analyses indicated that NLR and complications were associated with endotoxin levels. CONCLUSION: Administering perioperative enteral immunonutrition enhances postoperative immune and intestinal mucosal barrier functions in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy. This effect leads to diminished inflammatory responses, a decreased rate of postoperative complications, and accelerated patient recovery.

Immunonutrition: facilitating mucosal immune response in teleost intestine with amino acids through oxidant-antioxidant balance.

Comparative animal models generate fundamental scientific knowledge of immune responses. However, these studies typically are conducted in mammals because of their biochemical and physiological similarity to humans. Presently, there has been an interest in using teleost fish models to study intestinal immunology, particularly intestinal mucosa immune response. Instead of targeting the pathogen itself, a preferred approach for managing fish health is through nutrient supplementation, as it is noninvasive and less labor intensive than vaccine administrations while still modulating immune properties. Amino acids (AAs) regulate metabolic processes, oxidant-antioxidant balance, and physiological requirements to improve immune response. Thus, nutritionists can develop sustainable aquafeeds through AA supplementation to promote specific immune responses, including the intestinal mucosa immune system. We propose the use of dietary supplementation with functional AAs to improve immune response by discussing teleost fish immunology within the intestine and explore how oxidative burst is used as an immune defense mechanism. We evaluate immune components and immune responses in the intestine that use oxidant-antioxidant balance through potential selection of AAs and their metabolites to improve mucosal immune capacity and gut integrity. AAs are effective modulators of teleost gut immunity through oxidant-antioxidant balance. To incorporate nutrition as an immunoregulatory means in teleost, we must obtain more tools including genomic, proteomic, nutrition, immunology, and macrobiotic and metabonomic analyses, so that future studies can provide a more holistic understanding of the mucosal immune system in fish.

Phase Angle and Postoperative Complications in a Model of Immunonutrition in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of our own model of immunonutrition on phase angle and postoperative complications. Our goal was to establish modern prehabilitation procedures for patients operated on for pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic cancer who qualified for surgical treatment were divided into two groups. Group I (20 patients; 12 with pancreatic head cancer, 8 with pancreatic tail/body cancer) was given immunonutrition (Impact Oral 3× a day, 237 mL, for 5 days before surgery, and after surgery for an average of 3.5 days). Group II (20 patients; 12 with pancreatic head cancer, 8 with pancreatic tail/body cancer) did not receive immunonutrition. Body weight, body mass index and phase angle were assessed on admission to the hospital, after preoperative immunonutrition, on the third and eighth postoperative days. C-reactive protein and Interleukin-1 α were measured on admission to the hospital, after preoperative immunonutrition, on the eighth postoperative day. Postsurgical complications were assessed via Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: On admission to the hospital, the phase angle was 5.0° (4.70-5.85) in Group I and 5.1° (5.00-6.25) in Group II. After 5 days of using preoperative immunonutrition, it increased statistically significantly (p < 0.02) to 5.35°. In Group I, on the third day after surgery, it decreased statistically significantly (p < 0.001) to 4.65°, and then, increased to 4.85° on the eighth day. In Group II, statistically significant decreases in the phase angle were observed on the third (4.5°; p < 0.002) and eighth (4.55°; p < 0.008) days after surgery. A statistically significant increase in CRP (86.6 mg/dL; p < 0.02) and IL-1α (18.5 pg/mL; p < 0.03) levels was observed on the eighth day after surgery in this group. In Group I, a statistically significant negative correlation (R -0.501106; p < 0.002) of the phase angle after 5 days of preoperative immunonutrition with postoperative complications was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study used our own model of immunonutrition in patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancer. The applied model of perioperative IN improved the postoperative course of patients operated on due to pancreatic cancer. Fewer complications were observed in patients in the group receiving IN. Also, the PA value increased after the 5-day preoperative IN, and the use of perioperative IN improved the PA value on the eighth postoperative day compared to the group that did not receive IN. On this day, an increase in inflammatory parameters was also observed in the group that did not receive IN. In addition, PA correlated negatively with complications. The PA can be a useful tool to assess the effectiveness of the applied IN, and thus, to predict the occurrence of postoperative complications. Therefore, there is a further need for studies on larger groups of patients.

Synergistic Strategies for Gastrointestinal Cancer Care: Unveiling the Benefits of Immunonutrition and Microbiota Modulation.

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are a group of highly prevalent malignant tumors affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Globally, one in four cancer cases and one in three cancer deaths are estimated to be GI cancers. They can alter digestive and absorption functions, leading to severe malnutrition which may worsen the prognosis of the patients. Therefore, nutritional intervention and monitoring play a fundamental role in managing metabolic alterations and cancer symptoms, as well as minimizing side effects and increasing the effectiveness of chemotherapy. In this scenario, the use of immunonutrients that are able to modulate the immune system and the modification/regulation of the gut microbiota composition have gained attention as a possible strategy to improve the conditions of these patients. The complex interaction between nutrients and microbiota might contribute to maintaining the homeostasis of each individual's immune system; therefore, concurrent use of specific nutrients in combination with traditional cancer treatments may synergistically improve the overall care of GI cancer patients. This work aims to review and discuss the role of immunonutrition and microbiota modulation in improving nutritional status, postoperative recovery, and response to therapies in patients with GI cancer.