RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Acute pain episodes, also known as vaso-occlusive crises (VOC), are a major symptom of sickle cell disease (SCD) and lead to frequent hospitalizations. The diagnosis of VOC can be challenging, particularly in adults with SCD, 50% of whom have chronic pain. Several potential biomarkers have been proposed for identifying individuals with VOC, including elevation above the baseline of various vascular growth factors, cytokines, and other markers of inflammation. However, none have been validated to date. AREAS COVERED: We summarize prospective biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute pain in SCD, and how they may be involved in the pathophysiology of a VOC. Previous and current strategies for biomarker discovery, including the use of omics techniques, are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Implementing a multi-omics-based approach will facilitate the discovery of objective and validated biomarkers for acute pain.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Anemia de Células Falciformes , Biomarcadores , Anemia de Células Falciformes/complicaciones , Humanos , Dolor Agudo/etiología , Dolor Agudo/diagnósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of pregabalin combined with tramadol/paracetamol on acute pain in patients with CT-guided puncture localization of pulmonary nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled and single-center study, 120 patients were allocated randomly to four groups: the control group (Group P), the pregabalin-placebo group (Group BP), the tramadol/paracetamol-placebo group (Group AP), and the pregabalin-tramadol/paracetamol group (Group AB). The primary outcome was the NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) score. Other outcomes included systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), the incidence of moderate to severe pain, the analgesia recovery ratio, the incidence of adverse drug reactions and patients' satisfaction. RESULTS: No significant interaction was detected between the interventions (P = 0.752). The NRS score of the Taking pregabalin group and the Taking tramadol/paracetamol group were significantly lower than those of the Not-taking pregabalin group and the Not-taking tramadol/paracetamol group respectively (P < 0.05). There was significant difference in the NRS scores among the four groups (P < 0.001). The NRS score of Group AB was significantly lower than that of Group P (P < 0.001), Group BP (P < 0.001) and Group AP (P = 0.001). At the same time, the NRS scores of Group BP (P < 0.001) and Group AP (P < 0.001) were significantly lower than those of Group P, but there was no significant difference between Group BP and Group AP (P = 1.000). The SBP, DBP, HR, the incidence of moderate to severe pain and the analgesia recovery ratio of Group AB were significantly lower than those of Group P (P < 0.05), while the SpO2 and the number of people who were very satisfied were significantly higher than those of Group P (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse drug reactions among the four groups (P = 0.272). CONCLUSIONS: The combination or single use of pregabalin and tramadol/paracetamol can effectively relieve the acute pain after localization. Pregabalin combined with tramadol/paracetamol has the best analgesic effect and significantly reduces the hemodynamic fluctuations, with high safety and low incidence of adverse drug reactions, which has a certain clinical popularization and application value.
Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén , Dolor Agudo , Pregabalina , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Tramadol , Humanos , Tramadol/administración & dosificación , Tramadol/uso terapéutico , Tramadol/efectos adversos , Pregabalina/uso terapéutico , Pregabalina/administración & dosificación , Pregabalina/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Acetaminofén/administración & dosificación , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Acetaminofén/efectos adversos , Dolor Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Agudo/etiología , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Anciano , Quimioterapia Combinada , Adulto , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/efectos adversos , Punciones/efectos adversos , Punciones/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/diagnóstico por imagen , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/tratamiento farmacológico , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/patología , Dimensión del DolorRESUMEN
Anal pain can be acute (most commonly related to anal fissure, perianal abcess or fistula, perianal vein thrombosis) or chronic (functional or neuropathic) including levator ani syndrome, proctalgia fugax, pudendal nevralgia and coccygodynia. History and clinical examination are keys to diagnose acute causes. Diagnosis of chronic anal pain on the other hand is more challenging and based on thorough history and analysis of symptoms. The aim of this article is to discuss the main etiologies and treatments of acute and chronic anal pain, including an update on the management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease and postoperative pain management.
La douleur anale peut être de survenue aiguë (le plus fréquemment en lien avec une fissure anale, un abcès ou fistule anale, ou une thrombose des veines périanales) ou chronique (fonctionnelle ou neuropathique), comportant le syndrome du releveur de l'anus, la proctalgia fugax, la névralgie du pudendal et les coccygodynies. Le diagnostic d'une douleur anale aiguë est rapidement posé grâce à l'anamnèse et surtout l'examen clinique. Les causes chroniques sont en revanche plus difficiles à diagnostiquer et nécessitent un interrogatoire détaillé avec une analyse approfondie des symptômes. Le but de cet article est d'explorer le traitement des étiologies de douleur anale aiguë, de pouvoir reconnaître une grande part des douleurs anales chroniques, sans oublier une mise à jour sur la maladie hémorroïdaire avec la prévention et gestion des douleurs postopératoires.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Dolor Crónico , Humanos , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Dolor Agudo/terapia , Dolor Agudo/etiología , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Ano/terapia , Enfermedades del Ano/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Ano/etiología , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Canal AnalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines recommend nonpharmacologic and nonopioid therapies as first-line pain treatment for acute pain. However, little is known about their utilization generally and among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) for whom opioid and other pharmacologic therapies carry greater risk of harm. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between a pre-existing OUD diagnosis and treatment of acute low back pain (aLBP). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using 2016-2019 Medicare data. PARTICIPANTS: Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with a new episode of aLBP. MAIN MEASURES: The main independent variable was OUD diagnosis measured prior to the first LBP claim (i.e., index date). Using multivariable logistic regressions, we assessed the following outcomes measured within 30 days of the index date: (1) nonpharmacologic therapies (physical therapy and/or chiropractic care), and (2) prescription opioids. Among opioid recipients, we further assessed opioid dose and co-prescription of gabapentin. Analyses were conducted overall and stratified by receipt of physical therapy, chiropractic care, opioid fills, or gabapentin fills during the 6 months before the index date. KEY RESULTS: We identified 1,263,188 beneficiaries with aLBP, of whom 3.0% had OUD. Two-thirds (65.8%) did not receive pain treatments of interest at baseline. Overall, nonpharmacologic therapy receipt was less prevalent and opioid and nonopioid pharmacologic therapies were more common among beneficiaries with OUD than those without OUD. Beneficiaries with OUD had lower odds of receiving nonpharmacologic therapies (aOR = 0.62, 99%CI = 0.58-0.65) and higher odds of prescription opioid receipt (aOR = 2.24, 99%CI = 2.17-2.32). OUD also was significantly associated with increased odds of opioid doses ≥ 90 morphine milligram equivalents/day (aOR = 2.43, 99%CI = 2.30-2.56) and co-prescription of gabapentin (aOR = 1.15, 99%CI = 1.09-1.22). Similar associations were observed in stratified groups though magnitudes differed. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare beneficiaries with aLBP and OUD underutilized nonpharmacologic pain therapies and commonly received opioids at high doses and with gabapentin. Complementing the promulgation of practice guidelines with implementation science could improve the uptake of evidence-based nonpharmacologic therapies for aLBP.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Medicare , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Manejo del Dolor , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/epidemiología , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/terapia , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dolor Agudo/terapia , Dolor Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Gabapentina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) allows for the collection of participant-reported outcomes (PROs), including pain, in the normal environment at high resolution and with reduced recall bias. Ecological momentary assessment is an important component in studies of pain, providing detailed information about the frequency, intensity, and degree of interference of individuals' pain. However, there is no universally agreed on standard for summarizing pain measures from repeated PRO assessment using EMA into a single, clinically meaningful measure of pain. Here, we quantify the accuracy of summaries (eg, mean and median) of pain outcomes obtained from EMA and the effect of thresholding these summaries to obtain binary clinical end points of chronic pain status (yes/no). Data applications and simulations indicate that binarizing empirical estimators (eg, sample mean, random intercept linear mixed model) can perform well. However, linear mixed-effect modeling estimators that account for the nonlinear relationship between average and variability of pain scores perform better for quantifying the true average pain and reduce estimation error by up to 50%, with larger improvements for individuals with more variable pain scores. We also show that binarizing pain scores (eg, <3 and ≥3) can lead to a substantial loss of statistical power (40%-50%). Thus, when examining pain outcomes using EMA, the use of linear mixed models using the entire scale (0-10) is superior to splitting the outcomes into 2 groups (<3 and ≥3) providing greater statistical power and sensitivity.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Dolor Crónico , Evaluación Ecológica Momentánea , Modelos Estadísticos , Dimensión del Dolor , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Humanos , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Masculino , FemeninoRESUMEN
Adequate management of acute pain in the older population is crucial. However, it is inherently complex because of multiple physiological changes that significantly impact both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medications. Current guidelines promote paracetamol as the first-line analgesic for acute pain in older adults, whereas opioids are advised cautiously for moderate to severe acute pain. However, opioids come with a significant array of side effects, which can be more pronounced in older individuals. Ketamine administered via intranasal (IN) and nebulised inhalation in the emergency department for managing acute pain in older patients shows promising potential for improving pain management and reducing opioid reliance Kampan, Thong-on, Sri-on (2024, Age Ageing, 53, afad255). Nebulised ketamine appears superior in terms of adverse event incidence. However, the adoption of IN or nebulised ketamine in older adult acute pain management remains unclear because of the lack of definitive conclusions and clear guidelines. Nevertheless, these modalities can be valuable options for patients where opioid analgesics are contraindicated or when intravenous morphine titration is impractical or contraindicated. Here, we review these concepts, the latest evidence and propose avenues for research.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Ketamina , Dolor Musculoesquelético , Humanos , Anciano , Ketamina/efectos adversos , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Morfina/efectos adversos , Manejo del Dolor/efectos adversos , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Dolor Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Agudo/inducido químicamente , Dolor Musculoesquelético/inducido químicamente , Dolor Musculoesquelético/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Servicio de Urgencia en HospitalRESUMEN
The acute pain crisis (APC) is the commonest complication of sickle cell disease (SCD). Severe episodes may require treatment in hospital with strong opioid analgesic drugs, combined with additional supportive care measures. Guidelines for APC management have been produced over the past two decades gathering evidence from published studies, expert opinion, and patient perspective. Unfortunately, reports from multiple sources indicate that guidelines are often not followed, and that acute care in emergency departments and on acute medical wards is suboptimal. It is important to understand what leads to this breakdown in health care, and to identify evidence-based interventions which could be implemented to improve care. This review focuses on recently published articles as well as information about on-going clinical trials. Aspects of care which could potentially make a difference to patient experience include availability and accessibility of individual care plans agreed between patient and treating specialist, innovative means of delivering initial opioids to reduce time to first analgesia, and availability of a specialist unit away from the ED, where expert care can be delivered in a more compassionate environment. The current evidence of improved outcomes and health economic advantage with these interventions is inadequate, and this is hampering their implementation into health care systems.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Anemia de Células Falciformes , Humanos , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Dolor Agudo/etiología , Dolor Agudo/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Anemia de Células Falciformes/terapia , Anemia de Células Falciformes/tratamiento farmacológicoAsunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Realidad Virtual , Humanos , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Dolor Agudo/terapia , Manejo del DolorRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of using foam roller on pain intensity in individuals with chronic and acute musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: This systematic review was registered in the National Institute for Health Research's prospective online registry of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) under CRD42023456841. The databases Pubmed, Medline (via Ovid), Embase, BVS, and PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) were consulted to carry out this systematic review. Notably, the records of clinical trials characterized as eligible were manually searched. The search terms were: (foam rolling OR foam rolling vibration) AND (acute musculoskeletal pain) AND (chronic musculoskeletal pain). The search was performed until August 22, 2023. For the analysis of the methodological quality, the PEDro scale was used for each of the manuscripts included in the systematic review. Due to the heterogeneity in the studies included in this systematic review, performing a meta-analysis of the analyzed variables was impossible. RESULTS: Only six manuscripts were eligible for data analysis. The type of FR used was non-vibrational, being applied by a therapist in only one of the manuscripts. With an application time ranging from at least 45 s to 15 min, the non-vibrational FR was applied within a day up to six weeks. Using the PEDro scale, scores were assigned that varied between 4 and 8 points, with an average of 6 ± 1.29 points. Only two randomized clinical trials found a significant benefit in pain intensity of adding FR associated with a therapeutic exercise protocol in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome and chronic neck pain. CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review do not elucidate or reinforce the clinical use of FR in pain intensity in individuals with chronic and acute musculoskeletal pain.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Dolor Crónico , Dolor Musculoesquelético , Dimensión del Dolor , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Dolor Musculoesquelético/terapia , Dolor Musculoesquelético/diagnóstico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Agudo/terapia , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Vibración/uso terapéutico , Modalidades de FisioterapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Understanding the association of acute pain intensity and opioid consumption after cardiac surgery with chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) can facilitate implementation of personalized prevention measures to improve outcomes. The objectives were to (1) examine acute pain intensity and daily mg morphine equivalent dose (MME/day) trajectories after cardiac surgery, (2) identify factors associated with pain intensity and opioid consumption trajectories, and (3) assess whether pain intensity and opioid consumption trajectories are risk factors for CPSP. METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study design conducted between August 2012 and June 2020 with 1-year follow-up. A total of 1115 adults undergoing cardiac surgery were recruited from the preoperative clinic. Of the 959 participants included in the analyses, 573 completed the 1-year follow-up. Main outcomes were pain intensity scores and MME/day consumption over the first 6 postoperative days (PODs) analyzed using latent growth mixture modeling (GMM). Secondary outcome was 12-month CPSP status. RESULTS: Participants were mostly male (76%), with a mean age of 61 ± 13 years. Three distinct linear acute postoperative pain intensity trajectories were identified: "initially moderate pain intensity remaining moderate" (n = 62), "initially mild pain intensity remaining mild" (n = 221), and "initially moderate pain intensity decreasing to mild" (n = 251). Age, sex, emotional distress in response to bodily sensations, and sensitivity to pain traumatization were significantly associated with pain intensity trajectories. Three distinct opioid consumption trajectories were identified on the log MME/day: "initially high level of MME/day gradually decreasing" (n = 89), "initially low level of MME/day remaining low" (n = 108), and "initially moderate level of MME/day decreasing to low" (n = 329). Age and emotional distress in response to bodily sensations were associated with trajectory membership. Individuals in the "initially mild pain intensity remaining mild" trajectory were less likely than those in the "initially moderate pain intensity remaining moderate" trajectory to report CPSP (odds ratio [95% confidence interval, CI], 0.23 [0.06-0.88]). No significant associations were observed between opioid consumption trajectory membership and CPSP status (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.84 [0.28-2.54] and 0.95 [0.22-4.13]). CONCLUSIONS: Those with moderate pain intensity right after surgery are more likely to develop CPSP suggesting that those patients should be flagged early on in their postoperative recovery to attempt to alter their trajectory and prevent CPSP. Emotional distress in response to bodily sensations is the only consistent modifiable factor associated with both pain and opioid trajectories.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Analgésicos Opioides , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Dolor Crónico , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/psicología , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Masculino , Femenino , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Dolor Agudo/psicología , Anciano , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Effective acute pain control is mandatory after injury. Opioids continue to be a pillar acute pain management of strategies despite not being as effective as some nonnarcotic alternatives. An acute pain management strategy after trauma should be thoughtful, effective, and responsible. A thoughtful approach includes managing a patient's expectations for acute pain control and ensuring that interventions purposefully and rationally affect the domain of pain that is uncontrolled. An effective pain management strategy includes a multimodal approach using acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and regional anesthesia. A responsible acute pain management approach includes knowing the relative strengths of the opioids prescribed and standardized approach to opioid prescribing at discharge to minimize diversion. Acute pain management is quite understudied, and future considerations include a reliable objective measurement of pain and the evaluation of nonmedication acute pain interventions.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Manejo del Dolor , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Dolor Agudo/etiología , Dolor Agudo/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patient values and preferences (PVP) are among multiple sources of information panelists synthesize when developing clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Patient and public involvement (PPI) can be critical for learning PVP; however, the methodology for engaging patients in CPG development is lacking. Deliberative engagement is effective for obtaining public views on complex topics that require people to consider ethics, values, and competing perspectives. OBJECTIVE: Elicit comprehensive understanding of PVP concerning oral analgesics for managing acute dental pain consecutive to toothache and simple and surgical dental extractions, with consideration of associated outcomes, both desirable and undesirable. METHODS: Multistage engagement involving 2 electronic surveys and a 90-min online small group deliberative engagement. Adults who have experienced acute dental pain deliberated about 3 hypothetical scenarios stratified according to expected pain intensity, completed a postdeliberation survey, and validated a PVP statement developed by researchers based on review of qualitative data from deliberations and quantitative data from surveys. RESULTS: Participants affirmed the PVP statement reflected their small group deliberations and their individual views. Most indicated that pain relief is critical to deciding which pain relief medicine they would want regardless of expected pain level. Most also identify as critical concerns about substance abuse or misuse, although many believe it unlikely that they will experience these outcomes over the brief prescription timeframe for acute dental pain. Participants identified agency in decision-making, consultation including "better communication" of options, and treatment actions tailored to life circumstances as key values. CONCLUSIONS: Participants preferred nonprescription and nonopioid pain relief options. As expected pain levels increased, more participants expressed willingness to accept opioids, but more also mentioned rescue analgesia as a third outcome critical to decision-making. Online deliberative method provided opportunities for obtaining informed perspectives. Guideline developers and policymakers may find online deliberations useful for eliciting PVP related to health outcomes. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: Study results informed the US Food and Drug Administration-funded clinical practice guideline on the management of acute dental pain. Findings may be a resource for clinicians in decision-making conversations with patients regarding expectations for pain relief and positive and negative outcomes of differing pain relief medications. Further research should pursue applicability of online deliberative engagement as a method to elicit patient values and preferences.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Adulto , Humanos , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Dolor Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Manejo del Dolor , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , PacientesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is the largest healthcare network in the USA and has been a national leader in opioid safety for acute pain management. However, detailed information on the availability and characteristics of acute pain services within its facilities is lacking. We designed this project to assess the current state of acute pain services within the VHA. METHODS: A 50-question electronic survey developed by the VHA national acute pain medicine committee was emailed to anesthesiology service chiefs at 140 VHA surgical facilities within the USA. Data collected were analyzed by facility complexity level and service characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 140 VHA surgical facilities contacted, 84 (60%) completed the survey. Thirty-nine (46%) responding facilities had an acute pain service. The presence of an acute pain service was associated with higher facility complexity level designation. The most common staffing model was 2.0 full-time equivalents, which typically included at least one physician. Services performed most by formal acute pain programs included peripheral nerve catheters, inpatient consult services, and ward ketamine infusions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite widespread efforts to promote opioid safety and improve pain management, the availability of dedicated acute pain services within the VHA is not universal. Higher complexity programs are more likely to have acute pain services, which may reflect differential resource distribution, but the barriers to implementation have not yet been fully explored.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Salud de los Veteranos , Estados Unidos , Humanos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Clínicas de Dolor , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Dolor Agudo/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Post-operative pain is a common form of acute pain. Objective pain assessment in post-anesthesia care units after surgery is useful regardless of the patient's condition. AIMS: This study aimed to develop and evaluate an acute pain assessment tool for patients in post-anesthesia care units. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional observational study comprising two stages: scale development and psychometric evaluation. SETTINGS: â¯. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: â¯. METHODS: Scale items were developed based on a literature review and content validity by experts. The validity and interrater reliability of the pain scale were evaluated using data from 218 patients admitted to the post-anesthesia care unit at a university hospital. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to identify the sensitivity and specificity for determining the cutoff point for acute pain. RESULTS: We developed an objective acute pain scale, called the APA5, which ranges from 0-10 and comprises behavioral (facial and verbal expressions and body movement) and physiological (changes in heart rate and blood pressure) responses. The APA5 is valid and reliable for assessing acute pain in the recovery room. Sensitivity and specificity were acceptable when the cutoff was 2 out of 10 points. CONCLUSIONS: The APA5 is an easy and simple tool for measuring pain in patients in post-anesthesia care units who have difficulties with self-reporting.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Anestesia , Humanos , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Dimensión del Dolor , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Observacionales como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Thoracotomy is considered one of the most painful surgical procedures and can cause debilitating chronic post-surgical pain lasting months or years postoperatively. Aggressive management of acute pain resulting from thoracotomy may reduce the likelihood of developing chronic pain. This trial compares the two most commonly used modes of acute analgesia provision at the time of thoracotomy (thoracic epidural blockade (TEB) and paravertebral blockade (PVB)) in terms of their clinical and cost-effectiveness in preventing chronic post-thoracotomy pain. METHODS: TOPIC 2 is a multi-centre, open-label, parallel group, superiority, randomised controlled trial, with an internal pilot investigating the use of TEB and PVB in 1026 adult (≥ 18 years old) patients undergoing thoracotomy in up to 20 thoracic centres throughout the UK. Patients (N = 1026) will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either TEB or PVB. During the first year, the trial will include an integrated QuinteT (Qualitative Research Integrated into Trials) Recruitment Intervention (QRI) with the aim of optimising recruitment and informed consent. The primary outcome is the incidence of chronic post-surgical pain at 6 months post-randomisation defined as 'worst chest pain over the last week' equating to a visual analogue score greater than or equal to 40 mm indicating at least a moderate level of pain. Secondary outcomes include acute pain, complications of regional analgesia and surgery, health-related quality of life, mortality and a health economic analysis. DISCUSSION: Both TEB and PVB have been demonstrated to be effective in the prevention of acute pain following thoracotomy and nationally practice is divided. Identification of which mode of analgesia is both clinically and cost-effective in preventing chronic post-thoracotomy pain could ameliorate the debilitating effects of chronic pain, improving health-related quality of life, facilitating return to work and caring responsibilities and resulting in a cost saving to the NHS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03677856 [ClinicalTrials.gov] registered September 19, 2018. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03677856 . First patient recruited 8 January 2019.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Analgesia Epidural , Dolor Crónico , Bloqueo Nervioso , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Toracotomía/efectos adversos , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Dolor Crónico/prevención & control , Analgesia Epidural/efectos adversos , Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Dolor Agudo/etiología , Dolor Agudo/prevención & control , Calidad de Vida , Bloqueo Nervioso/efectos adversos , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como AsuntoRESUMEN
In the Emergency Department (ED), pain is one of the symptoms that are most frequently reported, making it one of the most significant issues for the emergency physician, but it is frequently under-treated. Intravenous (IV), oral (PO), and intramuscular (IM) delivery are the standard methods for administering acute pain relief. Firstly, we compared the safety and efficacy of IN analgesia to other conventional routes of analgesia to assess if IN analgesia may be an alternative for the management of acute pain in ED. Secondly, we analyzed the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) and rescue analgesia required. We performed a narrative review-based keywords in Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Controlled Trials Register, finding only twenty randomized Clinical trials eligible in the timeline 1992-2022. A total of 2098 patients were analyzed and compared to intravenous analgesia, showing no statistical difference in adverse effects. In addition, intranasal analgesia also has a rapid onset and quick absorption. Fentanyl and ketamine are two intranasal drugs that appear promising and may be taken simply and safely while providing effective pain relief. Intravenous is simple to administer, non-invasive, rapid onset, and quick absorption; it might be a viable choice in a variety of situations to reduce patient suffering or delays in pain management.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Analgesia , Humanos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Analgesia/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en HospitalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: More than half of all emergency department patients seek help for acute pain, which is usually of musculoskeletal origin. Acute pain is often inadequately treated even today, particularly in children and in older patients. In this study, we assess the potential role of regional anesthetic methods in improving the treatment of pain in the preclinical and clinical emergency setting. METHODS: Pain-related reasons for admission were identified and quantified from emergency admission data. A structured literature search was carried out for clinical studies on the treatment of pain in the emergency setting, and a before-and-after comparison of the pain relief achieved with established vs. newer regional anesthetic methods was performed. RESULTS: 43% of emergency patients presented with acute musculoskeletal pain. The literature search yielded 3732 hits for screening; data on entity-specific pain therapy spectra were extracted from 153 studies and presented for the main pain regions. The degree of pain relief obtained through regional anesthetic procedures, on a nominal rating scale from 0 to 10, was 4 to 7 points for acute back and chest wall pain, >6 for shoulder pain, 5 to 7 for hand and forearm injuries, and >4 for hip fractures. These results were as good as, or better than, those obtained by analgesia/sedation with strong opioids. CONCLUSION: Modern regional anesthetic techniques can improve acute pain management in the emergency department and, to some extent, in the pre-hospital setting as well. Pain relief with these techniques is quantifiably better than with strong opioids in some clinical situations; moreover, there is evidence of further advantages including process optimization and fewer complications. Data for comparative study remain scarce because of a lack of standardization.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Anestesia de Conducción , Niño , Humanos , Anciano , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Dolor Agudo/terapia , Anestesia de Conducción/métodos , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Analgésicos Opioides , HospitalesRESUMEN
This case describes a 36-year-old woman who presents with acute painful ulcers of the vulva four days after a covid-19 infection. Extensive additional examination ruled out sexually transmitted diseases and auto-immune diseases, leaving acute vulvar ulcers, triggered by a covid-19 infection, as likely diagnosis. The ulcers healed spontaneously without scarring.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , COVID-19 , Enfermedades de la Vulva , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Úlcera/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Vulva/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Vulva/etiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Vulva , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Dolor Agudo/etiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pain is an expected consequence of a surgery, but it is far from being well controlled. One major complication of acute pain is its risk of persistency beyond healing. This so-called chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) is defined as new or increased pain due to surgery that lasts for at least 3 months after surgery. CPSP is frequent, underlies a complex bio-psycho-social process and constitutes an important socioeconomic challenge with significant impact on patients' quality of life. Its importance has been recognized by its inclusion in the eleventh version of the ICD (International Classification of Diseases). RECENT FINDINGS: Evidence for most pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions preventing CPSP is inconsistent. Identification of associated patient-related factors, such as psychosocial aspects, comorbidities, surgical factors, pain trajectories, or biomarkers may allow stratification and selection of treatment options based on underlying individual mechanisms. Consequently, the identification of patients at risk and implementation of individually tailored, preventive, multimodal treatment to reduce the risk of transition from acute to chronic pain is facilitated. SUMMARY: This review will give an update on current knowledge on mechanism-based risk, prognostic and predictive factors for CPSP in adults, and preventive and therapeutic approaches, and how to use them for patient stratification in the future.