Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 5.813
Filtrar
1.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 186(15)2024 Apr 08.
Artículo en Danés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708699

RESUMEN

In the last decade, patients with chronic pain have expressed increasing interest in cannabis-derived products for adjuvant therapy when treatment is deemed refractory to conventional analgesics. At present, clinical evidence to support this treatment approach appears to be sparse. Not because clinical studies as such are lacking, but rather as a result of methodological bias in relation to study design, patient populations, and treatment protocols. In this review, research in cannabis medicine for relief of chronic pain is reviewed, mainly with reference to published meta-analytic studies.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Marihuana Medicinal , Humanos , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Marihuana Medicinal/uso terapéutico , Marihuana Medicinal/efectos adversos , Dronabinol/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico
2.
Trials ; 25(1): 330, 2024 May 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762720

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is the most common, disabling, and costly of all pain conditions. While evidence exists for the efficacy of both duloxetine and web-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) as monotherapy, there is a clear need to consider study of treatment components that may complement each other. In addition, given the reported association between patient's adherence and treatment outcomes, strategies are needed to enhance participant's motivation to adopt and maintain continued use of newly learned pain coping skills from CBT. METHODS: Two hundred eighty participants will be recruited from the primary care clinics of a large academic health care system in North Carolina. Participants with CMP will be randomized to one of three treatment arms: (1) combination treatment (duloxetine + web-based self-guided CBT) with phone-based motivational interviewing (MI), (2) combination treatment without phone-based MI, and (3) duloxetine monotherapy. Participants will be in the study for 24 weeks and will be assessed at baseline, week 13, and week 25. The primary outcome is the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-Global Pain Severity score, which combines BPI pain severity and BPI pain interference. Secondary measures include between-group comparisons in mean BPI pain severity and BPI pain interference scores. Data collection and outcome assessment will be blinded to treatment group assignment. DISCUSSION: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will determine if combination treatment with duloxetine and web-based CBT is superior to duloxetine monotherapy for the management of CMP. Furthermore, this RCT will determine the effectiveness of phone-based motivational interviewing in promoting the continued practice of pain coping skills, thereby enhancing treatment outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04395001 ClinicalTrials.gov. Registered on May 15, 2020.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina , Dolor Musculoesquelético , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Dolor Musculoesquelético/terapia , Dolor Musculoesquelético/psicología , Dolor Musculoesquelético/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Musculoesquelético/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Terapia Combinada , Dimensión del Dolor , Teléfono , Entrevista Motivacional , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Factores de Tiempo , Intervención basada en la Internet , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto
3.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 28(8): 3227-3240, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708481

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate pain control, functioning, and quality of life (QoL) recovery in patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP) or post-traumatic osteoarthritis (OA) pain in the ankle/foot area, treated with tapentadol prolonged release and unresponsive to other treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two observational retrospective studies were conducted using clinical practice datasets of patients with chronic pain in cLBP and OA foot/ankle at different time points (total follow-up=60-90 days). The studies assessed pain intensity by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scale (patients were classified as responder in case of ≥30% pain reduction), QoL by the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, patient satisfaction by the 7-point Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale; cLBP health status by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ); foot and ankle functional status by European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) score; and treatment-related AEs. RESULTS: For the cLBP setting, 37 patients were enrolled, of which 86.50% were classified as responders (n=32; CI: 75.5% ÷ 97.5%). For the foot/ankle OA pain setting, 21 patients were enrolled. Pain assessment at final follow-up was available only for 11 patients, of which 72.73% (n=8; CI: 39.0% ÷ 94.0%) were classified as responders. Statistically significant improvements were seen in the RMDQ, EQ-5D-5L, and PGIC scores in cLBP. Improvements in the EFAS, EQ-5D-5L, and PGIC scores were seen in OA as well. The incidence of treatment-related adverse reactions was low in both studies. CONCLUSIONS: In the study population, tapentadol prolonged release was effective and well tolerated in treating cLBP and post-traumatic foot/ankle OA chronic pain when used in a multimodal manner. The reduction in pain was accompanied by clinically relevant improvements in patients' functionality and QoL.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Calidad de Vida , Tapentadol , Humanos , Tapentadol/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Musculoesquelético/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Musculoesquelético/diagnóstico , Anciano , Osteoartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoartritis/complicaciones , Dimensión del Dolor , Adulto , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/tratamiento farmacológico , Recuperación de la Función , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Opioid Manag ; 20(2): 133-147, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700394

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess opioid prescribing patterns of primary care providers (PCPs) participating in a virtual tele-mentoring program for patients with chronic pain as compared to nonparticipants. DESIGN: We utilized Missouri Medicaid claims from 2013 to 2021 to compare opioid prescription dosages and daily supply of opioids prescribed by PCPs. Participants and nonparticipants were matched using propensity score matching. SETTING: Missouri Medicaid data were received through partnership with the Center for Health Policy's MO HealthNet Data Project, the state's leading provider of Medicaid data. PARTICIPANTS: Missouri-based prescribers. INTERVENTION: Show-Me Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO), an evidence-based provider-to-provider telehealth intervention that connects PCPs with a team of specialists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We compared the rate of prescription opioid >50 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), mean MMEs/day, and mean number of daily supply to understand the impact of the ECHO model on providers' opioid prescribing. RESULTS: Patients treated by ECHO providers have 33 percent lower odds of being prescribed opioid dose >50 MME/day (p < 0.001) compared to non-ECHO providers. There is also a 14 percent reduction in the average opioid dose prescribed to patients of ECHO providers (p < 0.001). We observed a 3 percent (p < 0.001) reduction in average daily supply of opioids among patients of ECHO providers compared to the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: Pain Management ECHO supports PCPs with needed education and skills to provide specialty care in the management of pain conditions and safe prescribing of opioid medications.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Dolor Crónico , Medicaid , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Telemedicina , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Missouri , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estados Unidos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros
5.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 37(2): 290-294, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740467

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted how primary care patients with chronic pain received care. Our study sought to understand how long-term opioid therapy (LtOT) for chronic pain changed over the course of the pandemic overall and for different demographic subgroups. METHODS: We used data from electronic health records of 64 primary care clinics across Washington state and Idaho to identify patients who had a chronic pain diagnosis and were receiving long-term opioid therapy. We defined 10-month periods in 2019 to 2021 as prepandemic, early pandemic and late pandemic and used generalized estimating equations analysis to compare across these time periods and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: We found a proportional decrease in LtOT for chronic pain in the early months of the pandemic (OR = 0.94, P = .007) followed by an increase late pandemic (OR = 1.08, P = .002). Comparing late pandemic to prepandemic, identifying as Asian or Black, having fewer comorbidities, or living in an urban area were associated with higher likelihood of being prescribed LtOT. DISCUSSION: The use of LtOT for chronic pain in primary care has increased from before to after the COVID-19 pandemic with racial/ethnic and geographic disparities. Future research is needed to understand these disparities in LtOT and their effect on patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , COVID-19 , Dolor Crónico , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Masculino , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Washingtón/epidemiología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Idaho/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias
6.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 167, 2024 May 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755534

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Australia, motor vehicle crashes (MVC)-related health data are available from insurance claims and hospitals but not from primary care settings. This study aimed to identify the frequency of MVC-related consultations in Australian general practices, explore the pharmacological management of health conditions related to those crashes, and investigate general practitioners' (GPs) perceived barriers and enablers in managing these patients. METHODS: Mixed-methods study. The quantitative component explored annual MVC-related consultation rates over seven years, the frequency of chronic pain, depression, anxiety or sleep issues after MVC, and management with opioids, antidepressants, anxiolytics or sedatives in a sample of 1,438,864 patients aged 16 + years attending 402 Australian general practices (MedicineInsight). Subsequently, we used content analysis of 81 GPs' qualitative responses to an online survey that included some of our quantitative findings to explore their experiences and attitudes to managing patients after MVC. RESULTS: MVC-related consultation rates remained stable between 2012 and 2018 at around 9.0 per 10,000 consultations. In 2017/2018 compared to their peers, those experiencing a MVC had a higher frequency of chronic pain (48% vs. 26%), depression/anxiety (20% vs. 13%) and sleep issues (7% vs. 4%). In general, medications were prescribed more after MVC. Opioid prescribing was much higher among patients after MVC than their peers, whether they consulted for chronic pain (23.8% 95%CI 21.6;26.0 vs. 15.2%, 95%CI 14.5;15.8 in 2017/2018, respectively) or not (15.8%, 95%CI 13.9;17.6 vs. 6.7%, 95% CI 6.4;7.0 in 2017/2018). Qualitative analyses identified a lack of guidelines, local referral pathways and decision frameworks as critical barriers for GPs to manage patients after MVC. GPs also expressed interest in having better access to management tools for specific MVC-related consequences (e.g., whiplash/seatbelt injuries, acute/chronic pain management, mental health issues). CONCLUSION: Chronic pain, mental health issues and the prescription of opioids were more frequent among patients experiencing MVC. This reinforces the relevance of appropriate management to limit the physical and psychological impact of MVC. GPs identified a lack of available resources (e.g. education, checklists and management support tools) for managing MVC-related consequences, and the need for local referral pathways and specific guidelines to escalate treatments.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito , Dolor Crónico , Medicina General , Humanos , Australia/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Trauma Psicológico/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/epidemiología , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Médicos Generales/psicología , Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico
7.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(9)2024 Apr 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38731944

RESUMEN

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a prevalent complication of joint replacement surgery which has the potential to decrease patient satisfaction, increase financial burden, and lead to long-term disability. The identification of risk factors for CPSP following TKA and THA is challenging but essential for targeted preventative therapy. Recent meta-analyses and individual studies highlight associations between elevated state anxiety, depression scores, preoperative pain, diabetes, sleep disturbances, and various other factors with an increased risk of CPSP, with differences observed in prevalence between TKA and THA. While the etiology of CPSP is not fully understood, several factors such as chronic inflammation and preoperative central sensitization have been identified. Other potential mechanisms include genetic factors (e.g., catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and potassium inwardly rectifying channel subfamily J member 6 (KCNJ6) genes), lipid markers, and psychological risk factors (anxiety and depression). With regards to therapeutics and prevention, multimodal pharmacological analgesia, emphasizing nonopioid analgesics like acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), has gained prominence over epidural analgesia. Nerve blocks and local infiltrative anesthesia have shown mixed results in preventing CPSP. Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonist, exhibits antihyperalgesic properties, but its efficacy in reducing CPSP is inconclusive. Lidocaine, an amide-type local anesthetic, shows tentative positive effects on CPSP. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) have mixed results, while gabapentinoids, like gabapentin and pregabalin, present hopeful data but require further research, especially in the context of TKA and THA, to justify their use for CPSP prevention.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Dolor Postoperatorio , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/farmacología
8.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 15: 21501319241253547, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742616

RESUMEN

More than 50 million Americans suffer from chronic pain, costing our society an estimated 565 to 635 billion dollars annually. Its complexity and training deficits in healthcare providers result in many patients receiving ineffective care. Large health inequities also exist in access to effective pain care for vulnerable populations. The traumatic history of indigenous people and people of color in regards to the experience of pain care perpetuates a lack of trust in the healthcare system, causing many to hesitate to seek medical treatment for painful events and conditions. Other vulnerable populations include those with sickle cell disease or fibromyalgia, whose experience of pain has not been well-understood. There are both barriers to care and stigma for patients with pain, including those taking prescribed doses of long-term opioids, those with known substance use disorder, and those with mental health diagnoses. The suffering of patients with pain can be "invisible" to the clinician, and to one's community at large. Pain can affect all people; but those most vulnerable to not getting effective care may continue to suffer in silence because their voices are not heard. Since 1973, pain societies around the globe have worked tirelessly to bring clinicians together to advance pain and opioid education, research, and patient care. These improvements consist of pain education, integrative treatment, and the understanding that a therapeutic alliance is critical to effective pain management. Pain education for both pre and post-licensure health professionals has increased substantially over the last decade. In addition, integrative and interdisciplinary approaches for clinical pain management are now considered best practices in pain care for patients with moderate to severe pain in addition to the development of a strong therapeutic alliance.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Humanos , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos , Salud Pública , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Poblaciones Vulnerables
9.
Toxins (Basel) ; 16(5)2024 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787068

RESUMEN

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) injection can safely be done as an office-based procedure, but can be painful itself, especially when injecting pelvic floor muscles to treat chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Mindfulness interventions may reduce procedure-associated acute anxiety and pain. We applied mindfulness techniques to increase the tolerability of office-based pelvic floor BoNT injections in women with CPP. Women enrolled in a clinical trial of BoNT for endometriosis-associated CPP were offered a brief, guided mindfulness session before and/or after transvaginal injection. Anxiety, pain, and dysphoria were rated on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) before and after each mindfulness session. Eight women underwent mindfulness sessions. Five participants had a session before and two after the transvaginal injection. One participant had two sessions: one before and one after separate injections. All six women completing a session prior to injection had at least moderate anxiety, which lessened after the mindfulness session (median NRS change: -3.3/10). All three women reporting injection-associated pain experienced less intense pain following the post-injection session (median NRS change: -3/10). Three women experiencing dysphoria improved after the session (median NRS change: -3/10). A brief, guided mindfulness session may lessen acute pain, anxiety, and dysphoria associated with office-based transvaginal BoNT injection.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Atención Plena , Diafragma Pélvico , Dolor Pélvico , Humanos , Femenino , Dolor Pélvico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Pélvico/terapia , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Diafragma Pélvico/fisiopatología , Ansiedad/terapia , Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Toxinas Botulínicas/administración & dosificación , Endometriosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Endometriosis/psicología , Endometriosis/complicaciones
10.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy ; 19(1): 25, 2024 May 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702783

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is little study of lifetime trauma exposure among individuals engaged in medication treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD). A multisite study provided the opportunity to examine the prevalence of lifetime trauma and differences by gender, PTSD status, and chronic pain. METHODS: A cross-sectional study examined baseline data from participants (N = 303) enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of a mind-body intervention as an adjunct to MOUD. All participants were stabilized on MOUD. Measures included the Trauma Life Events Questionnaire (TLEQ), the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5). Analyses involved descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, and linear and logistic regression. RESULTS: Participants were self-identified as women (n = 157), men (n = 144), and non-binary (n = 2). Fifty-seven percent (n = 172) self-reported chronic pain, and 41% (n = 124) scored above the screening cut-off for PTSD. Women reported significantly more intimate partner violence (85%) vs 73%) and adult sexual assault (57% vs 13%), while men reported more physical assault (81% vs 61%) and witnessing trauma (66% vs 48%). Men and women experienced substantial childhood physical abuse, witnessed intimate partner violence as children, and reported an equivalent exposure to accidents as adults. The number of traumatic events predicted PTSD symptom severity and PTSD diagnostic status. Participants with chronic pain, compared to those without chronic pain, had significantly more traumatic events in childhood (85% vs 75%). CONCLUSION: The study found a high prevalence of lifetime trauma among people in MOUD. Results highlight the need for comprehensive assessment and mental health services to address trauma among those in MOUD treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04082637.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Humanos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Adulto , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Factores Sexuales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trauma Psicológico/epidemiología
11.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 252, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561733

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic neck pain (CNP) is a common public health problem that affects daily living activities and quality of life. There is biomechanical interdependence between the neck and scapula. Studies have shown that shoulder blade function might be related to chronic neck pain. We therefore evaluated the effects of scapular targeted therapy on neck pain and function in patients with CNP. METHODS: Databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE (via Ovid), Ovid, Web of Science, and Scopus, were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials published in English investigating treatment of the scapula for CNP before July 16, 2023. RESULTS: A total of 313 participants were included from 8 RCTs. Compared with those in the control group, the intervention in the scapular treatment group exhibited greater improvement in pain intensity (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 2.55; 95% CI = 0.97 to 4.13; P = 0.002), with moderate evidence. Subgroup analysis for pain intensity revealed a significant difference between the sexes, with only the female population (SMD = 6.23, 95% CI = 4.80 to 7.65) showing better outcomes than those with both sexes (SMD = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.57 to 1.56) (p < 0.00001). However, moderate evidence demonstrated no improvement in neck disability after scapular treatment (SMD of 0.24[-0.14, 0.62] of Neck Disability Index or Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire). No effect of scapular treatment was shown on the pressure pain threshold (PPT). The cervical range of motion (CROM) and electromyographic activity of neck muscles could not be conclusively evaluated due to limited support in the articles, and further study was needed. However, the patient's head forward posture appeared to be corrected after scapular treatment. CONCLUSION: Scapular therapy was beneficial for relieving pain intensity in patients with CNP, especially in women. Head forward posture might also be corrected with scapular therapy. However, scapular therapy may have no effect on the PPT or neck disability. However, whether scapular therapy could improve CROM and cervical muscle activation in patients with CNPs had not been determined and needed further study.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Dolor de Cuello , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Dolor de Cuello/diagnóstico , Dolor de Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Cuello , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Escápula
12.
Am Fam Physician ; 109(3): 233-244, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38574213

RESUMEN

Chronic low back pain, defined as lumbar pain persisting for 12 weeks or more, occurs in about 13% of U.S. adults. Patients with chronic low back pain should have a history and physical examination to identify red flags that may indicate serious conditions that warrant immediate intervention or yellow flags (i.e., psychological, environmental, and social factors) that indicate risk of disability. The examination should include an evaluation for radicular symptoms. Routine imaging is not recommended but is indicated when red flags are present, there is a neuromuscular deficit, or if pain does not resolve with conservative therapy. Patients should avoid bed rest. Nonpharmacologic treatment is first-line management and may include therapies with varying evidence of support, such as counseling, exercise therapy, spinal manipulation, massage, heat, dry needling, acupuncture, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and physical therapy. Pharmacologic interventions are second-line treatment. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the initial medication of choice; duloxetine may also be beneficial. Evidence is inconclusive to recommend the use of benzodiazepines, muscle relaxants, antidepressants, corticosteroids, insomnia agents, anticonvulsants, cannabis, acetaminophen, or long-term opioids. Epidural corticosteroid injections are not recommended except for short-term symptom relief in patients with radicular pain. Most patients with chronic low back pain will not require surgery; evaluation for surgery may be considered in those with persistent functional disabilities and pain from progressive spinal stenosis, worsening spondylolisthesis, or herniated disk. Physicians should consider prevention of chronic low back pain when patients present with acute back pain. Screening tools are available to predict the progression from acute to chronic low back pain, and targeted treatment strategies are beneficial for preventing progression.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Manipulación Espinal , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/etiología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico
13.
Sci Transl Med ; 16(742): eadj0395, 2024 Apr 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598615

RESUMEN

Chronic primary pain conditions (CPPCs) affect over 100 million Americans, predominantly women. They remain ineffectively treated, in large part because of a lack of valid animal models with translational relevance. Here, we characterized a CPPC mouse model that integrated clinically relevant genetic (catechol-O-methyltransferase; COMT knockdown) and environmental (stress and injury) factors. Compared with wild-type mice, Comt+/- mice undergoing repeated swim stress and molar extraction surgery intervention exhibited pronounced multisite body pain and depressive-like behavior lasting >3 months. Comt+/- mice undergoing the intervention also exhibited enhanced activity of primary afferent nociceptors innervating hindpaw and low back sites and increased plasma concentrations of norepinephrine and pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-17A. The pain and depressive-like behavior were of greater magnitude and longer duration (≥12 months) in females versus males. Furthermore, increases in anxiety-like behavior and IL-6 were female-specific. The effect of COMT genotype × stress interactions on pain, IL-6, and IL-17A was validated in a cohort of 549 patients with CPPCs, demonstrating clinical relevance. Last, we assessed the predictive validity of the model for analgesic screening and found that it successfully predicted the lack of efficacy of minocycline and the CB2 agonist GW842166X, which were effective in spared nerve injury and complete Freund's adjuvant models, respectively, but failed in clinical trials. Yet, pain in the CPPC model was alleviated by the beta-3 adrenergic antagonist SR59230A. Thus, the CPPC mouse model reliably recapitulates clinically and biologically relevant features of CPPCs and may be implemented to test underlying mechanisms and find new therapeutics.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Ratas , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Ratones , Animales , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/genética , Catecol O-Metiltransferasa/genética , Interleucina-17 , Interleucina-6 , Ratas Sprague-Dawley
14.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(7)2024 Mar 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38612414

RESUMEN

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) frequently experience chronic pain due to the limited effectiveness and safety profiles of current analgesics. Understanding the molecular and synaptic mechanisms underlying abnormal neuronal activation along the pain signaling pathway is essential for developing new analgesics to address SLE-induced chronic pain. Recent studies, including those conducted by our team and others using the SLE animal model (MRL/lpr lupus-prone mice), have unveiled heightened excitability in nociceptive primary sensory neurons within the dorsal root ganglia and increased glutamatergic synaptic activity in spinal dorsal horn neurons, contributing to the development of chronic pain in mice with SLE. Nociceptive primary sensory neurons in lupus animals exhibit elevated resting membrane potentials, and reduced thresholds and rheobases of action potentials. These changes coincide with the elevated production of TNFα and IL-1ß, as well as increased ERK activity in the dorsal root ganglion, coupled with decreased AMPK activity in the same region. Dysregulated AMPK activity is linked to heightened excitability in nociceptive sensory neurons in lupus animals. Additionally, the increased glutamatergic synaptic activity in the spinal dorsal horn in lupus mice with chronic pain is characterized by enhanced presynaptic glutamate release and postsynaptic AMPA receptor activation, alongside the reduced activity of glial glutamate transporters. These alterations are caused by the elevated activities of IL-1ß, IL-18, CSF-1, and thrombin, and reduced AMPK activities in the dorsal horn. Furthermore, the pharmacological activation of spinal GPR109A receptors in microglia in lupus mice suppresses chronic pain by inhibiting p38 MAPK activity and the production of both IL-1ß and IL-18, as well as reducing glutamatergic synaptic activity in the spinal dorsal horn. These findings collectively unveil crucial signaling molecular and synaptic targets for modulating abnormal neuronal activation in both the periphery and spinal dorsal horn, offering insights into the development of analgesics for managing SLE-induced chronic pain.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos MRL lpr , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Interleucina-18 , Proteínas Quinasas Activadas por AMP , Ácido Glutámico , Interleucina-1beta , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos
15.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 248, 2024 Apr 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38637804

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Conservative management is recommended as the first therapeutic step in chronic low back pain (LBP), but there is no available evidence regarding the possible effect of patients' baseline characteristics on the therapeutic outcomes. A systematic review of the literature was performed to investigate this point. METHODS: In February 2024, all the level I studies investigating the role of pharmacological management for chronic LBP were accessed. Data concerning the patient demographic at baseline were collected: number of patients and related mean BMI and age, duration of the symptoms, duration of the follow-up, percentage of females, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The outcomes at the last follow-up were evaluated through NRS, RMQ, and ODI. A multiple linear model regression diagnostic through the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (r) was used. RESULTS: Data from 47 articles (9007 patients) were obtained. The analysis yielded the following significant associations: age at baseline and NRS at follow-up (r = - 0.22; P = 0.04), NRS at baseline with NRS (r = 0.26; P = 0.03) and RMQ (r = - 0.58; P = 0.02) at follow-up, RMQ at baseline and the same at follow-up (r = 0.69; P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Older age, higher BMI, presence of comorbidities, higher ODI and a long history of symptoms or surgical treatments do not reduce the efficacy of pharmacological management of chronic LBP. However, pharmacological therapy is not an effective option for patients with high baseline RMQ. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I systematic review of RCTs.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Humanos , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Tratamiento Conservador , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/tratamiento farmacológico , Dimensión del Dolor , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
16.
CNS Drugs ; 38(5): 375-385, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38597988

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Disordered autonomic nervous system regulation and supraspinal pain inhibition have been repeatedly described in chronic pain. We aimed to explore the effects of δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), an emerging treatment option, on autonomic nervous system and central pain modulation measures in patients with chronic pain. METHODS: Twelve male patients with chronic radicular neuropathic pain participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled, single-administration trial. Low/high frequency (LF/HF) heart rate variability (HRV) ratio and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) response were measured and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at baseline and after sublingual administration of either 0.2 mg/kg oral THC or placebo. RESULTS: THC significantly reduced the LF/HF ratio compared with placebo (interaction effect F(1,11) = 20.5; p < 0.005) and significantly improved CPM responses (interaction effect F(1,9) = 5.2; p = 0.048). The THC-induced reduction in LF/HF ratio correlated with increased functional connectivity between the rostral ventrolateral medulla and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [T(10) = 6.4, cluster p-FDR < 0.005]. CONCLUSIONS: THC shifts the autonomic balance towards increased parasympathetic tone and improves inhibitory pain mechanisms in chronic pain. The increase in vagal tone correlates with connectivity changes in higher-order regulatory brain regions, suggesting THC exerts top-down effects. These changes may reflect a normalizing effect of THC on multiple domains of supraspinal pain dysregulation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: NCT02560545.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Neuralgia , Humanos , Masculino , Dronabinol/farmacología , Dronabinol/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuralgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Encéfalo , Método Doble Ciego , Estudios Cruzados
17.
Int J Pharm Compd ; 28(2): 100-109, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38604146

RESUMEN

Pain syndromes are among the most widespread, costly, and debilitating of all neurological disorders. The number of patients living with chronic pain is expected to increase with the aging population and with the rise in obesity and diabetes across the nation. This type of pain is often insensitive to the traditional pain pharmacopeia or surgical intervention. Over the last 10 years the number of prescriptions that have been compounded by pharmacists has increased dramatically. There are a number of drugs in the area of pain management that have been formulated and compounded by pharmacists to treat conditions such as diabetic neuropathy, fibromyalgia, postherpetic neuralgia, joint pain, arthritis, and a variety of other conditions. A significant portion of these compounded analgesic preparations is made up of topical/transdermal dosage forms such as gels and creams. While the efficacy and doses of these drugs in systemic dosage forms have been widely established, little is known about the permeation and efficacy of these compounds from topical/transdermal gels. This review will provide an overview of chronic pain as a disease, the mechanisms of chronic pain, current treatment approaches to chronic pain, and a discussion of the drugs that are typically compounded into these topical formulations and studied in clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Neuralgia Posherpética , Neuralgia , Humanos , Anciano , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuralgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos , Neuralgia Posherpética/tratamiento farmacológico , Geles/uso terapéutico
18.
Ann Intern Med ; 177(4): 458-466, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588545

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As medical cannabis availability increases, up-to-date trends in medical cannabis licensure can inform clinical policy and care. OBJECTIVE: To describe current trends in medical cannabis licensure in the United States. DESIGN: Ecological study with repeated measures. SETTING: Publicly available state registry data from 2020 to 2022. PARTICIPANTS: People with medical cannabis licenses and clinicians authorizing cannabis licenses in the United States. MEASUREMENTS: Total patient volume and prevalence per 10 000 persons in the total population, symptoms or conditions qualifying patients for licensure (that is, patient-reported qualifying conditions), and number of authorizing clinicians. RESULTS: In 2022, of 39 jurisdictions allowing medical cannabis use, 34 reported patient numbers, 19 reported patient-reported qualifying conditions, and 29 reported authorizing clinician numbers. Enrolled patients increased 33.3% from 2020 (3 099 096) to 2022 (4 132 098), with a corresponding 23.0% increase in the population prevalence of patients (175.0 per 10 000 in 2020 to 215.2 per 10 000 in 2022). However, 13 of 15 jurisdictions with nonmedical adult-use laws had decreased enrollment from 2020 to 2022. The proportion of patient-reported qualifying conditions with substantial or conclusive evidence of therapeutic value decreased from 70.4% (2020) to 53.8% (2022). Chronic pain was the most common patient-reported qualifying condition in 2022 (48.4%), followed by anxiety (14.2%) and posttraumatic stress disorder (13.0%). In 2022, the United States had 29 500 authorizing clinicians (7.7 per 1000 patients), 53.5% of whom were physicians. The most common specialties reported were internal or family medicine (63.4%), physical medicine and rehabilitation (9.1%), and anesthesia or pain (7.9%). LIMITATION: Missing data (for example, from California), descriptive analysis, lack of information on individual use patterns, and changing evidence base. CONCLUSION: Enrollment in medical cannabis programs increased overall but generally decreased in jurisdictions with nonmedical adult-use laws. Use for conditions or symptoms without a strong evidence basis continues to increase. Given these trends, more research is needed to better understand the risks and benefits of medical cannabis. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.


Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Dolor Crónico , Marihuana Medicinal , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Marihuana Medicinal/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
19.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 257, 2024 Apr 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658933

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Endometriosis (EM) involves the peripheral nervous system and causes chronic pain. Sensory nerves innervating endometriotic lesions contribute to chronic pain and influence the growth phenotype by releasing neurotrophic factors and interacting with nearby immune cells. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a pain-signaling neurotransmitter, has a significant role. This study examines the effect of Dienogest (DNG), a hormone therapy used for managing EM -related pain, on serum CGRP levels in EM patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessed pain in diagnosed EM. INDIVIDUALS: Serum samples were obtained to measure CGRP concentration. Participants received a 2 mg/day oral dose of DNG for six months as prescribed treatment. Additional serum samples were collected after this period to measure CGRP levels. RESULTS: In the EM group, 6.7%, 33.3%, and 20% had ovarian EM, ovarian plus uterosacral, and ovarian plus bladder, respectively. The EM group showed higher CGRP serum levels than the control group (80.53 ± 16.13 vs. 58.55 ± 6.93, P < 0.0001). Still, after drug administration, CGRP serum levels significantly decreased compared to pre-treatment levels (69.66 ± 11.53 vs. 80.53 ± 16.13, P < 0.05). The EM group showed higher pain compared to the control group (7.93 ± 1.58 vs. 0.13 ± 0.35, P < 0.0001), but after drug administration, pain significantly decreased compared to pre-treatment levels (1.00 ± 2.00 vs. 7.93 ± 1.58, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DNG administration reduces pain and serum CGRP levels in EM patients, offering the potential for innovative treatments and tailored options. Understanding neurotransmitter roles and drug effects can aid in discovering more effective modulators for these pathways.


Asunto(s)
Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina , Endometriosis , Nandrolona , Nandrolona/análogos & derivados , Dolor Pélvico , Humanos , Femenino , Endometriosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Endometriosis/sangre , Nandrolona/uso terapéutico , Nandrolona/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina/sangre , Dolor Pélvico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Pélvico/etiología , Dolor Pélvico/sangre , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Adulto Joven
20.
J Neural Transm (Vienna) ; 131(5): 563-580, 2024 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38570361

RESUMEN

Over 50 million Americans endure chronic pain where many do not receive adequate treatment and self-medicate to manage their pain by taking substances like opioids and cannabis. Research has shown high comorbidity between chronic pain and substance use disorders (SUD) and these disorders share many common neurobiological underpinnings, including hypodopaminergic transmission. Drugs commonly used for self-medication such as opioids and cannabis relieve emotional, bothersome components of pain as well as negative emotional affect that perpetuates misuse and increases the risk of progressing towards drug abuse. However, the causal effect between chronic pain and the development of SUDs has not been clearly established. In this review, we discuss evidence that affirms the proposition that chronic pain is a risk factor for the development of opioid and cannabis use disorders by outlining the clinical evidence and detailing neurobiological mechanisms that link pain and drug misuse. Central to the link between chronic pain and opioid and cannabis misuse is hypodopaminergic transmission and the modulation of dopamine signaling in the mesolimbic pathway by opioids and cannabis. Moreover, we discuss the role of kappa opioid receptor activation and neuroinflammation in the context of dopamine transmission, their contribution to opioid and cannabis withdrawal, along with potential new treatments.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Dolor Crónico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/fisiopatología , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Animales , Abuso de Marihuana/complicaciones , Abuso de Marihuana/fisiopatología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA