Evolving Dynamics of Neck Muscle Activation Patterns in Dental Students: A Longitudinal Study.

Cervical pain has been linked to increased motor unit activity, potentially associated with the initiation and progression of chronic neck pain. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the time-course changes in cervical superficial muscle activation patterns among dental students with and without neck pain throughout their initial semester of clinical training. We used an online Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire for group allocation between neck pain (NP) (n = 21) and control group (CG) (n = 23). Surface electromyography (sEMG) of the sternocleidomastoid and upper bilateral trapezius was recorded before starting their clinical practice and after their first semester while performing a cranio-cervical flexion test (CCFT) in five increasing levels between 22 mmHg and 30 mmHg. After the first semester, both the CG (p < 0.001) and NP (p = 0.038) groups showed decreased sternocleidomastoid activation. The NP group exhibited a concomitant increase in upper trapezius coactivation (p < 0.001), whereas the muscle activation pattern in asymptomatic students remained unchanged (p = 0.980). During the first semester of clinical training, dental students exhibited decreased superficial flexor activity, but those with neck pain had increased co-contraction of the upper trapezius, likely to stabilize the painful segment. This altered activation pattern could be associated with further dysfunction and symptoms, potentially contributing to chronicity.

Cervical Sensorimotor Function Tests Using a VR Headset-An Evaluation of Concurrent Validity.

Sensorimotor disturbances such as disturbed cervical joint position sense (JPS) and reduced reaction time and velocity in fast cervical movements have been demonstrated in people with neck pain. While these sensorimotor functions have been assessed mainly in movement science laboratories, new sensor technology enables objective assessments in the clinic. The aim was to investigate concurrent validity of a VR-based JPS test and a new cervical reaction acuity (CRA) test. Twenty participants, thirteen asymptomatic and seven with neck pain, participated in this cross-sectional study. The JPS test, including outcome measures of absolute error (AE), constant error (CE), and variable error (VE), and the CRA test, including outcome measures of reaction time and maximum velocity, were performed using a VR headset and compared to a gold standard optical motion capture system. The mean bias (assessed with the Bland-Altman method) between VR and the gold standard system ranged from 0.0° to 2.4° for the JPS test variables. For the CRA test, reaction times demonstrated a mean bias of -19.9 milliseconds (ms), and maximum velocity a mean bias of -6.5 degrees per seconds (°/s). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between VR and gold standard were good to excellent (ICC 0.835-0.998) for the JPS test, and excellent (ICC 0.931-0.954) for reaction time and maximum velocity for the CRA test. The results show acceptable concurrent validity for the VR technology for assessment of JPS and CRA. A slightly larger bias was observed in JPS left rotation which should be considered in future research.

Relationships between stenosis severity, functional limitation, pain, and quality of life in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.

Background/aim: This study aimed to examine the relationships between severity of stenosis, pain, functional limitation, disability, and quality of life in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Materials and methods: Patients (45 female, 19 male) with radiculopathy due to spondylotic changes in the cervical spine were included in this study. Stenosis severity (thecal sac cross-sectional area (CSA)), numbness, neck and arm pain severity, functional limitation (Cervical Radiculopathy Impact Scale), disability, and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L General Quality of Life Scale) were evaluated. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT06001359. Results: According to CSA values, 28 (43.75%) patients had severe stenosis and 36 (56.25%) had moderate stenosis, and the average CSA was 81.65 ± 10.08 mm2. Positive correlations were found between both neck and arm pain and neck disability (r = 0.597, r = 0.359), and negative correlations were found for the General Quality of Life Scale index score and EQ-5D-3L visual analog scale (r = -0.787, r = -0.518). There were significant positive correlations between Cervical Radiculopathy Impact Scale subscales and severity of stenosis, neck and arm pain, numbness, and disability (p < 0.05 for all). A significant negative correlation was observed between Cervical Radiculopathy Impact Scale subscales and quality of life (p < 0.01). Stenosis severity was correlated with pain, neck disability, and quality of life (p < 0.01 for all). Conclusion: There are direct relationships between cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and neck and arm pain, numbness, disability, and quality of life. Additionally, an increase in the severity of cervical stenosis is associated with an increase in pain and disability.

Effects of Integrating Jaw Opening and Closing Movements with Active Neck Exercises in the Management of Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background and Objectives: It has been seen that jaw opening is associated with neck extension and jaw closing is associated with neck flexion. This natural association between the jaw and neck can be used as a novel approach to treat chronic non-specific neck pain, although the effects of this concept have never been previously evaluated as a treatment strategy. This article intends to study the effects of integrating jaw opening and closing movements along with active neck exercises versus active neck exercises alone in the management of chronic non-specific neck pain. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 patients, aged 20 to 50, with chronic non-specific neck pain were included in a double-blind randomized controlled trial, conducted at the Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Karachi, Pakistan from 2018 to 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A patients were assigned jaw movements with active neck exercises, while Group B patients were assigned only active neck exercises. Both groups were assigned isometric strengthening exercises and self-resisted strengthening exercises for cervical spine muscles as a home plan. The study used various outcome measures, including the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), neck disability index (NDI), neck flexion endurance (NFE), neck extension endurance (NEE), the neck proprioception error (NPE): neck flexion proprioception error (NFPE), neck extension proprioception error (NEPE), neck right rotation proprioception error (NRRPE), and neck left rotation proprioception error (NLRPE), with measurements taken at week 1 and week 6, respectively; the mean differences between the groups were measured using a two-way repeated ANOVA. Results: The experimental group showed better improvements compared to the control group, NPRS (73%), NDI (57%), NFE (152%), NEE (83%), NFPE (58%), NEPE (65%), NRRPE (65%), and NLRPE (62%), with a significant difference (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Active neck extension and flexion movements combined with jaw opening and closing are more effective in reducing pain and disability, improving neck muscles endurance and normalizing neck proprioception in patients with chronic neck pain.

Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation therapy versus manual therapy in patients with neck pain: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation therapy with manual therapy in improving the range of motion, decreasing pain, and improving activity of daily living in patients with neck pain. DESIGN: Double-blinded, randomized, experimental study. PATIENTS: Women aged 45-65 with cervical pain due to osteoarthritis of the vertebral body and intervertebral disc. METHODS: A total of 93 randomly selected females were included in the study. They were randomly divided into 2 groups. One received proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation treatment and the other received manual therapy. To evaluate functional capabilities, the Oswestry Disability Index and range of motion measure were used. To evaluate changes in subjective experience of pain the Visual Analogue Scale was used. RESULTS: In terms of the activities of daily living, pain, and range of motion of flexion, extension, lateral flexion to the right and left, and rotation to the right and left improvement in group I compared with group II was statistically significant (p < 0.05) at 2 weeks and 3 months' follow-up. CONCLUSION: Treatment according to proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation is a better method in comparison with manual therapy regarding improvement of pain, range of motion, and daily functioning in patients with cervical pain.

Comparing the effects of neck stabilization exercises versus dynamic exercises among patients having nonspecific neck pain with forward head posture: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Nonspecific neck pain (NSNP) is a well-established global burden affecting. It is also a common problem in Pakistan. The burden of neck pain is also increasing day by day due to poor work ergonomics, and increased use of computers and mobiles after the pandemic. An individual's poor posture is often associated with forward head posture (FHP). Limited evidence is available about the effects of neck stabilization (NSE) and dynamic exercises (NDE) for nonspecific neck pain particularly in patients with FHP. This aimed to compare the effects of NSE versus NDE among patients having NSNP with FHP in reducing pain, disability, forward head posture and improving neck range of motion. METHODS: It is a single-blinded randomized clinical trial with 60 patients aged 18-40 years, with moderate intensity NSNP for > 3 weeks and < 6 months along with FHP with a moderate disability on neck disability index (NDI) randomly assigned to the treatment groups. Group 1 was doing NSE and group 2 was doing NDE. Transcutaneous Electical Nerve Stimulation, cold packs, and stretching exercises were given to both groups. A total of 9 sessions (3 sessions/ week) were given to participants. NDI questionnaire, Visual analogue scale (VAS), goniometry, and plumb line measurement tool were used as baseline and assessment at the end of 3rd week. The data was analyzed on SPSS version 21. Descriptive analysis was performed. Independent t-test was used for between group comparison and paired t-test used for within group comparison. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: After treatment within-group analysis of both NSE and NDE showed significant (p < 0.001) improvement in pain on VAS, all ROMs of the neck including flexion, extension, left and right lateral flexion and left rotation, plumb line and NDI score with very large effect size. However, between-group analysis showed non-significant differences (p > 0.05) for post-treatment mean VAS, neck ROM, NDI and plumb line measurement. CONCLUSION: Between NSE and NDE, no one is more beneficial than another. Both are equally effective in alleviating pain, increasing ROM, decreasing functional disability, and improving forward head posture in patients with NSNP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered trial at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05298631, 28/03/2022, prospectively registered.

The deflection of fatigued neck.

The human neck is a unique mechanical structure, highly flexible but fatigue prone. The rising prevalence of neck pain and chronic injuries has been attributed to increasing exposure to fatigue loading in activities such as prolonged sedentary work and overuse of electronic devices. However, a causal relationship between fatigue and musculoskeletal mechanical changes remains elusive. This work aimed to establish this relationship through a unique experiment design, inspired by a cantilever beam mechanical model of the neck, and an orchestrated deployment of advanced motion-force measurement technologies including dynamic stereo-radiographic imaging. As a group of 24 subjects performed sustained-till-exhaustion neck exertions in varied positions-neutral, extended, and flexed, their cervical spine musculoskeletal responses were measured. Data verified the occurrence of fatigue and revealed fatigue-induced neck deflection which increased cervical lordosis or kyphosis by 4-5° to 11°, depending on the neck position. This finding and its interpretations render a renewed understanding of muscle fatigue from a more unified motor control perspective as well as profound implications on neck pain and injury prevention.

The Role of the Cervical Spine in Dizziness.

The neck can be implicated in dizziness via several, separate, discreet mechanisms. Proprioceptive cervicogenic dizziness (CGD) is the most common and reflects the cervical spine's important role, along with visual and vestibular input, for sensorimotor control. Impaired cervical proprioception can lead to symptoms such as dizziness, unsteadiness, visual disturbances, and altered sensorimotor control, and treatment directed toward cervical musculoskeletal and sensorimotor control is efficacious to improve this in individuals with cervical musculoskeletal disorders. Despite this, CGD is difficult to diagnose. Many people present with both neck pain and dizziness, and often the onset of both follows head and neck trauma, but neither necessarily implicate the neck as the cause of dizziness. Further, people often present with mixed forms of dizziness. Thus, rather than diagnosing CGD, it might be more important to consider the potential for the neck to have no (nil, co-morbid cervical condition) or some (minor, major, or compensatory) role in dizziness. Determining the precise role of the cervical spine role in dizziness requires a skilled interview and examination for cervical musculoskeletal and related sensorimotor impairments and relevant testing of other potential causes. A combination and cluster of test outcomes in addition to comparing responses to specific tests when the cervical afferents are stimulated and not stimulated will be important. Considering the role of the neck in dizziness will allow a balanced approach in assessment and management to allow timely, effective intervention to be provided to the large number of individuals presenting with neck pain and dizziness (Supplemental Digital Content, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A484 ).

Sex differences in cervical disc height and neck muscle activation during manipulation of external load from helmets.

Neck pain associated with helmet-wear is an occupational health problem often observed in helicopter pilots and aircrew. Whether aircrew helmet wearing is associated with physiological and biomechanical differences between sexes is currently unknown. This study investigated neuromuscular activation patterns during different helmet-wearing conditions. The helmet load was manipulated through a novel Helmet Balancing System (HBS) in healthy, non-pilot male and female participants (n = 10 each, age 19-45 years) in two phases. Phase A assessed the acute effects of helmet-wear on neck muscles activation during head movements. Phase B examined changes in muscle activity and cervical disc height after wearing a helmet for 45 min. In Phase A, muscle activity was similar between sexes in many movements, but it was higher in female participants when wearing a helmet than in males. The HBS reduced muscle activity in both sexes. In Phase B, female participants exhibited a greater level of muscular fatigue, and male participants' cervical disc height was significantly decreased [5.7 (1.4) vs. 4.4 (1.5) mm, P < 0.001] after continuous wearing. Both sexes showed no significant change in muscle fatigue and disc height [male: 5.0 (1.3) vs. 5.2 (1.4) mm, P = 0.604] after applying HBS. These findings demonstrate sex-specific physiological and biomechanical responses to wearing a helmet. They may indicate different postural and motor control strategies, associated with different neck pain aetiologies in male and female aircrew, the knowledge of which is important to reduce or prevent musculoskeletal injuries associated with helmet wearing.

Goniometry and fleximetry measurements to assess cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic neck pain: a validity and reliability study.

PURPOSE: To assess the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of goniometry and fleximetry in measuring cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic neck pain. METHODS: A reliability study. Thirty individuals with chronic neck pain were selected. Cervical range of motion was measured by goniometry and fleximetry at two time points 7 days apart. To characterize the sample, we used the numerical pain rating scale, Pain-Related Catastrophizing Thoughts Scale, and Neck Disability Index. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated. Correlations between goniometry and fleximetry measurements were performed using Spearman's correlation coefficient (rho). RESULTS: For goniometry, we found excellent test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.986, SEM ≤ 1.89%, MDC ≤ 5.23%) and inter-rater reliability (ICC ≥ 0.947, SEM ≤ 3.91%, MDC ≤ 10.84%). Similarly, we found excellent test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.969, SEM ≤ 2.71%, MDC ≤ 7.52%) and inter-rater reliability (ICC ≥ 0.981, SEM ≤ 1.88%, MDC ≤ 5.20%) for fleximetry. Finally, we observed a strong correlation between the goniometry and the fleximetry for all cervical movements (rho ≥ 0.993). CONCLUSION: Goniometry and fleximetry measurements are reliable for assessing cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic neck pain.

The prevalence of cervical contribution in patients reporting shoulder pain. An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is the third most common musculoskeletal disorder yet diagnosis remains challenging. In some cases, shoulder symptoms can be partially attributed to a cervical origin. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of cervical contribution in patients presenting with shoulder pain. To determine symptom reproduction and symptom modification (i.e., pain intensity and pain location) after cervical spine screening (CSS) and compare these changes between patients with and without cervical contribution. DESIGN: Observational study. METHOD: Sixty patients were included. Cervical contribution was present if a ≥30.0% change in shoulder pain intensity on active movement was recorded after CSS. The CSS consisted of several tests and shoulder symptom modification or reproduction was noted. The presence of a centralization phenomenon was also noted and was considered to be present if the location of pain diminished from more distal areas after the CSS. RESULTS: A 50.0% prevalence of cervical contribution (CI95% 37,35-62,65) was found. Cervical contribution was more likely in those that demonstrated centralization of their pain after the CSS (p = 0.002) and those that had a history of previous neck pain (p = 0.007). Symptom reproduction occurred for 23 out of the 60 participants (38.3%), being present in 18 of those with cervical contribution (60.0%). After the CSS, a statistically significant decrease of shoulder pain intensity was found for those classified as having cervical contribution (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Cervical contribution is prevalent in 50% of patients presenting with shoulder pain; this was evidenced as shoulder symptom modification and, to a lesser extent, symptom reproduction following a CSS.

Comparison of Outcomes of Physical Therapy Exercises Combined with Either a Video-Based Smartphone Application System or a Written Exercise Program Handout in 34 Patients with Non-Specific Neck Pain.

BACKGROUND An exercise program was developed using risk factors for non-specific neck pain. This study aimed to compare the effects video-based versus image- and text-based remote home training performed using this exercise program in patients with non-specific neck pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS Among the 37 patients with non-specific neck pain recruited, 34 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. The participants were randomized into the experimental (n=17) and control (n=17) groups. The patients in the experimental group performed exercises using a video-based application system, whereas those in the control group performed exercises using an image- and text-based printout. In-home training was implemented for 6 weeks in both groups. The neck pain intensity, disability index, active range of motion (aROM), forward head posture (FHP), and compensatory neck flexion were measured before and after the intervention. The within-group and between-group differences were analyzed at the end of the interventions. RESULTS Improvements in pain intensity, cervical ROM, disability index, FHP, and compensatory neck flexion were observed after in-home training in the experimental group (P.05). Between-group comparison revealed that the experimental group exhibited greater improvement in pain intensity, cervical ROM, and FHP than the control group (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study suggest that the video-based home exercise program improved pain intensity, aROM, neck disability index, FHP, and compensatory neck flexion in patients with non-specific neck pain.

Efficacy and Safety of Shi Cervical Rotational Manipulation in Patients With Atlantoaxial Joint Subluxation: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The clinical diagnosis of atlantoaxial joint subluxation (AJS) in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is characterized by an unequal distance between the lateral mass of the atlas and the odontoid process on imaging, resulting in neck pain accompanied by symptoms such as dizziness, headache, and limited cervical mobility. In Shanghai, Shi cervical rotational manipulation (SCRM) is a commonly employed TCM manual therapy for treating this condition. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence-based medical information regarding the clinical efficacy and safety of this technique. OBJECTIVE: The principal aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SCRM in patients diagnosed with AJS. METHODS: This study is a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial that will be conducted at a single center and that has a follow-up period of 24 weeks. A total of 96 patients diagnosed with AJS will be recruited from outpatient and inpatient clinics at Shanghai Baoshan Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine. These patients will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group (SCRM) or the comparison group (basic cervical manipulation [BCM]). Treatment sessions consisting of SCRM or BCM will be administered twice a week for a duration of 4 weeks. Clinical monitoring indicators include the presence or absence of clinical symptoms as recorded on a symptom recording form, cervical imaging examination findings using cervical computed tomography, degree of neck pain measured by a visual analog scale (VAS), cervical range of motion assessed through cervical mobility measurement, degree of vertigo evaluated using the Vertigo Symptoms Scale-Chinese Version (VSS-C), and adverse events that may occur during the follow-up period. The time points for data collection and follow-up are baseline and postintervention (weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24). RESULTS: This paper presents an overview of the reasoning and structure of a prospective randomized controlled trial with the objective of investigating the clinical efficacy and safety of SCRM in patients with AJS by assessing improvements in clinical symptoms, neck pain severity, and vertigo severity and evaluating changes in cervical imaging findings. Recruitment was started in March 2023. By the end of May 2024, 76 patients were included in this project. The last follow-up data are predicted to be collected by the end of February 2025. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation will yield dependable evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of SCRM in patients with AJS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300068510; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=186883. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/57865.

The association between mobile phone usage duration, neck muscle endurance, and neck pain among university students.

The mobile phone is essential in daily life, especially during the pandemic. Prolonged use can cause postural issues, leading to common neck pain. This study aims to determine the correlation between mobile phone use duration, addiction, neck muscle endurance, and neck pain in university students. The study included 62 participants (30 female, 32 male) aged 18-35 years. Inclusion criteria required participants to have experienced neck pain at least twice in the past year and to have no other concomitant issues, as well as to volunteer for the study. Demographic information and daily mobile phone usage time were collected. Neck pain was assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale, smartphone addiction with the Smartphone Addiction Scale, and cervical muscle endurance was evaluated. Correlation analysis reveals a moderate relationship between neck pain severity (NPS) and cervical extensor muscle endurance (CEME), a strong relationship between NPS and cervical flexor muscle endurance (CFME), as well as a strong relationship among daily phone usage time (DPUT), CFME, and NPS, with a moderate relationship between DPUT and CEME. Participants were divided into two groups based on their DPUT, revealing that those who used their phone for four hours or more showed significantly higher levels of pain (p < 0.05) and reduced endurance in cervical flexor muscles. Our study found a strong correlation between neck pain, muscle endurance, and daily phone usage. Participants using their phones for more than four hours daily reported increased neck pain and decreased muscle endurance. We suggest integrating phone usage duration into neck pain assessments, promoting ergonomic practices, and offering detailed usage guidelines for users.

Neck muscle function improves after neck exercises in individuals with whiplash-associated disorders: a case-control ultrasound study with speckle-tracking analyses.

A whiplash injury can alter neck muscle function, which remains years after the injury and may explain why symptoms such as persistent pain and disability occur. There is currently limited knowledge about dynamic neck muscle function in chronic whiplash-associated disorders (WAD), and about the extent to which altered muscle function can improve after rehabilitation. Ultrasound can detect mechanical neck muscle function by measuring real-time deformation and deformation rate in the muscles. This method was used for five dorsal neck muscles in participants with chronic WAD versus matched controls in resistant neck rotation. We obtained real-time, non-invasive ultrasound measurements using speckle tracking, multivariate analyses, and mixed-design ANOVA analyses. The results showed altered deformation in the three deepest neck muscle layers, with less deformation area in the WAD group compared to controls in rotation to the most painful side at baseline. Participants in the WAD group performed three months of neck-specific exercises, resulting in improved deformation in the deep neck muscles in WAD and with a similar deformation pattern to controls, and the significant group differences ceased. We reveal new and important insights into the capability of ultrasound to diagnose altered neck muscle function and evaluate an exercise intervention.

Efficacy Comparison of Osteopathic Muscle Energy Techniques and Cervical Mobilization on Pain, Disability, and Proprioception in Cervical Spondylosis Patients.

BACKGROUND Cervical spondylosis (CS) is a degenerative disease of the cervical spine characterized by persistent neck pain. Cervical facet joint mobilization (CM) and the osteopathic muscle energy technique (MET) are effective manual procedures for the treatment of neck pain. In this study, we compared the efficacy of the MET and CM techniques on pain, disability, and proprioception in 76 patients with CS. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 96 participants with a diagnosis of CS were randomized into an electro-thermal therapy (ET) group (control group, n=32), ET+MET group (experiment I, n=32), and ET+CM group (experiment II, n=32). All patients received 3 treatment sessions per week for 4 consecutive weeks. Pain intensity, functional disability and cervical position sense were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale (CNFDS), and cervical range of motion (CROM) device. RESULTS The study was completed by 76 participants. VAS and CNFDS scores decreased significantly after treatment in all 3 groups (P<0.001); however, there was no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). Between-group analysis showed a significant difference in extension joint position error in favor of MET (P<0.001), while there was no significant difference between the groups in other movement directions (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS MET and CM have similar effects on improving pain and disability in individuals with CS and chronic neck pain. However, the results of this study show that MET combined with ET is a more effective method for improving cervical position sense.

Is cervical sagittal alignment associated with pain and disability in myofascial pain syndrome?: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the role of cervical sagittal alignment in the pathophysiology of cervical myofascial pain syndrome(MFPS) and its impact on pain levels and disability status among patients. METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study included participants aged 18-64 years experiencing neck pain for more than 3 months and diagnosed with MFPS. Cervical sagittal parameters (C0-2 cervical lordosis(CL) angle, C2-7 CL angle, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope, T1 slope minus CL mismatch(T1S-CL), and cervical tilt) were measured using Surgimap software by an expert physiatrist. Pain levels were assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale(NRS), and neck disability was evaluated using the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire(NBQ). RESULTS: Out of 200 initially assessed participants with cervical MFPS, 133 were included after excluding ineligible individuals. The mean age of the participants was 35.3±8.2 years. Participants categorized by pain severity (moderate vs. severe) showed no significant differences in cervical range of motion, C0-2 angle, cSVA, T1 slope and T1S-CL. However, significant differences were observed in C2-7 angle (p=0.008), cervical tilt (p=0.006), and NBQ scores (p<0.001) between the two pain severity groups. Grouping based on T1S-CL compliance showed no significant differences in pain and disability effects. Correlation analysis revealed weak negative correlations between pain levels and C2-7 Cobb angle (p=0.009, r=0.226) as well as cervical tilt (p=0.005, r=0.243). No correlations were found between cervical sagittal parameters and NBQ scores. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased C2-7 CL angle and cervical tilt angle are associated with increased pain levels; however, cervical sagittal alignment was not found to be associated with disability.

The effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on individuals with text neck syndrome: A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Text neck syndrome is an overuse condition that has become a global problem for all ages who use smartphones. Although therapeutic approaches are used to manage text neck syndrome, relatively little evidence exists on efficacy. This study aimed to investigate the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) techniques on individuals with text neck syndrome. METHODS: Thirty-eight participants with text neck syndrome were randomly allocated to either the experimental or control group. Both groups performed the program including cervical range of motion, strengthening, and posture correction exercises for 6 weeks, 3 days a week, once a day for 10 repetitions. In the experimental group were included in a PNF program 3 days a week for 6 weeks. In the program, contract-relax and replication techniques were used. Pain intensity, cervical range of motion, cervical muscles' endurance, posture, and disability were assessed. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and after 6 weeks. RESULTS: Pain intensity, neck muscle endurance tests, posture, and disability scores significantly improved in both groups (P < .05). The cervical range of motion values in all directions were significantly increased only in the experimental group (P < .05). The improvements in pain intensity, neck muscle endurance tests, posture, and disability scores were greater in the experimental group compared with the control group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: PNF could be used effectively to reduce neck pain and disability level and enhance cervical range of motion, cervical muscles' endurance, and posture in individuals with text neck syndrome.

Multimodal therapeutic intervention program associated with photobiomodulation therapy for individuals with chronic nonspecific neck pain: protocol for a clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a prevalent global musculoskeletal issue, significantly contributing to the loss of years of healthy life due to disability. Chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNNP) involves diverse symptoms impacting mobility and quality of life. While therapeutic exercises demonstrate efficacy, the role of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) remains uncertain. This study aims to assess the additional effects of PBMT within a multimodal therapeutic intervention for CNNP. METHODS: A randomized, two-arm, controlled, blind clinical trial follows CONSORT and SPIRIT guidelines. Participants diagnosed with CNNP will receive a stand-alone multimodal therapeutic intervention or the same program with additional PBMT. The primary outcomes will be assessed by the functional disability identified through applying the NDI (Neck Disability Index). Secondary outcomes will be pain intensity during rest and active neck movement, catastrophizing and kinesiophobia, functionality, and disability assessed at baseline, after 8 weeks, and at a 4-week follow-up. Both groups receive pain education before personalized interventions, including resistance exercises, neuromuscular activities, mobility, and body balance. The PBMT group undergoes low-level light therapy. Intention-to-treat analysis, using linear mixed models, employs data presented as mean, standard deviation, and differences with a 95% confidence interval. Non-normally distributed variables transform. Statistical significance is set at 5%. DISCUSSION: This study addresses a critical gap in understanding the combined effects of PBMT and therapeutic exercises for CNNP. The findings aim to guide clinicians, researchers, and CNNP sufferers through rigorous methodology and diverse outcome assessments, offering valuable insights into evidence-based practices for CNNP management. Data confidentiality is maintained throughout, ensuring participant privacy during statistical analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Effects of adding photobiomodulation to a specific therapeutic exercise program for the treatment of individuals with chronic nonspecific neck pain, registration number: NCT05400473, on 2022-05-27.

Neck Kinematics in Patients With Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain: An Observational Study to Explore the Integration of Multiple Influencing Factors Through a Bayesian Model-Based Approach.

The aim of this observational, cross-sectional study is to evaluate potential differences in kinematics, specifically range of motion (ROM) and velocity, during planar cervical movements between patients with non-traumatic chronic neck pain and disability and asymptomatic controls, while accounting for potential influencing variables of age, sex and fear of movement. The influence of pain intensity, neck disability, age, sex or fear of motion on kinematics was analyzed through robust multivariate Bayesian regression models fitted using the brms library in R. Forty-three patients with neck pain (aged 36.70 ± 13.75 years; 10 men and 33 women) and 42 asymptomatic participants (aged 32.74 ± 13.24 years; 25 men and 17 women) completed the study protocol. The presence of neck pain/disability was associated with lower ROM and peak velocity during all planar movements when considering the influence of age, sex or fear of motion, with standardized regression coefficients that had a small effect size (ranged from 0.11 to 0.28) and estimated differences of less than 2.21° in ROM and 25.61°/s in peak velocity. Although patients with chronic mechanical neck pain showed reduced ROM and peak velocity, the small effect sizes and the low estimated differences between groups question the relevance and clinical usefulness of kinematic analysis of planar movements in samples of patients similar to those included in our study. It is probable that there are differences between the groups, but it is insufficient to rely solely on kinematic variables for patient discrimination. This limitation likely arises from the substantial variability in patient kinematics.