Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 124
Filtrar
1.
World J Surg ; 48(3): 662-672, 2024 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38305774

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chest pain following a thoracotomy for esophageal cancer is frequently reported but poorly understood. This study aimed to (1) determine the prevalence of thoracotomy-related thoracic fractures on postoperative imaging and (2) compare complications, long-term pain, and quality of life in patients with versus without these fractures. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with esophageal cancer who underwent a thoracotomy between 2010 and 2020 with pre- and postoperative CTs (<1 and/or >6 months). Disease-free patients were invited for questionnaires on pain and quality of life. RESULTS: Of a total of 366 patients, thoracotomy-related rib fractures were seen in 144 (39%) and thoracic transverse process fractures in 4 (2%) patients. Patients with thoracic fractures more often developed complications (89% vs. 74%, p = 0.002), especially pneumonia (51% vs. 39%, p = 0.032). Questionnaires were completed by 77 after a median of 41 (P25 -P75 28-91) months. Long-term pain was frequently (63%) reported but was not associated with thoracic fractures (p = 0.637), and neither were quality of life scores. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic fractures are prevalent in patients following a thoracotomy for esophageal cancer. These thoracic fractures were associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, especially pneumonia, but an association with long-term pain or reduced quality of life was not confirmed.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Neumonía , Fracturas de las Costillas , Pared Torácica , Humanos , Toracotomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Fracturas de las Costillas/cirugía , Neumonía/etiología , Dolor en el Pecho/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicaciones
3.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 34(6): 1370-1376, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37232420

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been associated with variable incidence (0.88%-10%) of pericarditis manifested as chest pain, possibly more prevalent with the advent of high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation. This has led to the widespread use of colchicine in preventative protocols for postablation pericarditis. However, the efficacy of preventative colchicine has not been validated yet. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a routine postoperative colchicine regimen (0.6 mg twice a day for 14 days post-AF ablation) for prevention of postablation pericarditis in patients undergoing HPSD ablation. METHOD: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive single-operator HPSD AF ablation procedures at our institution from June 2019 to July 2022. A colchicine protocol was introduced in June 2021 for the prevention of postablation pericarditis. All ablations were performed with 50 watts. Patients were divided into colchicine and noncolchicine groups. We recorded incidence of postablation chest pain, emergency room (ER) visit for chest pain, pericardial effusion, pericardiocentesis, any ER visit, hospitalization, AF recurrence, and cardioversion for AF within the first 30 days following ablation. We also recorded colchicine-related side effects and medication compliance. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-four consecutive HPSD AF ablation patients were screened for the study. After implementing the prespecified exclusion criteria, a total of 205 patients were included in the final analysis, yielding 101 patients in the colchicine group and 104 patients in the noncolchicine group. Both groups were well-matched for demographic and procedural parameters. There was no significant difference in postablation chest pain (9.9% vs. 8.6%, p = .7), pericardial effusion (2.9% vs. 0.9%, p = .1), ER visits (11.9% vs. 12.5%, p = .2), 30-day hospitalization for AF recurrence (0.9% vs. 0.96%, p = .3), and 30-day need for cardioversion for AF (3.9% vs. 5.7%, p = .2). Fifteen (15) patients had severe colchicine-related diarrhea, out of which 12 discontinued it prematurely. There were no major procedural complications in either group. CONCLUSION: In this single-operator retrospective analysis, prophylactic colchicine was not associated with significant reduction in the incidence of postablation chest pain, pericarditis, 30 day hospitalization, ER visits, or AF recurrence or need of cardioversion within first 30 days after HPSD ablation for AF. However, its usage was associated with significant diarrhea. This study concludes no additional advantage of prophylactic use of colchicine after HPSD AF ablation.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Derrame Pericárdico , Pericarditis , Venas Pulmonares , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Colchicina/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Derrame Pericárdico/diagnóstico , Derrame Pericárdico/epidemiología , Derrame Pericárdico/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pericarditis/diagnóstico , Pericarditis/prevención & control , Pericarditis/epidemiología , Diarrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Diarrea/etiología , Diarrea/cirugía , Dolor en el Pecho/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Recurrencia , Venas Pulmonares/cirugía
4.
Surg Innov ; 30(6): 745-757, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36998190

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is the most common standard technique worldwidely for Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Another type of fundoplication, laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF), intends to reduce incidence of postoperative complications. A systematic review and meta-analysis are required on short- and long-term outcomes based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between LNF and LTF. METHODS: We searched databases including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Knowledge for RCTs comparing LNF and LTF. Outcomes included postoperative reflux recurrence, postoperative heartburn, dysphagia and postoperative chest pain, inability to belch, gas bloating, satisfaction with intervention, postoperative esophagitis, postoperative DeMeester scores, operating time (min), in-hospital complications, postoperative use of proton pump inhibitors, reoperation rate, postoperative lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure (mmHg). We assessed data using risk ratios and weighted mean differences in meta-analyses. RESULTS: Eight eligible RCTs comparing LNF (n = 605) and LTF (n = 607) were identified. There were no significant differences between the LNF and LTF in terms of postoperative reflux recurrence, postoperative heartburn, postoperative chest pain, satisfaction with intervention, reoperation rate in short and long term, in-hospital complications, esophagitis in short term, and gas bloating, postoperative DeMeester scores, postoperative use of proton pump inhibitors, reoperation rate in long term. LTF had lower LOS pressure (mmHg), fewer postoperative dysphagia and inability to belch in short and long term and gas bloating in short term compared to LNF. CONCLUSION: LTF were equally effective at controlling reflux symptoms and improving the quality of life, but with lower rate of complications compared to LNF. We concluded that LTF surgical treatment was superior for over 16 years old patients with typical symptoms of GERD and without upper abdominal surgical history upon high-level evidence of evidence-based medicine.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Esofagitis , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Adolescente , Fundoplicación/efectos adversos , Fundoplicación/métodos , Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Trastornos de Deglución/complicaciones , Pirosis/etiología , Pirosis/cirugía , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Esofagitis/complicaciones , Esofagitis/cirugía , Dolor Postoperatorio , Dolor en el Pecho/complicaciones , Dolor en el Pecho/cirugía
5.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 27(2): 390-397, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36650419

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The ICARUS guidelines are a systematic review and Delphi process that provide recommendations in the treatment and management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Many of the recommendations were supported by randomized trials; some were not. This study assesses guidelines with limited evidence and weak endorsement. METHODS: Four ICARUS guidelines were chosen: the role of fundoplication for patients with BMI > 35, regurgitation, chest pain, and extra-esophageal symptoms. A multicenter database of patients undergoing fundoplication surgery for GERD between 2015 and 2020 was used. Outcomes assessed were anatomic failure and symptom recurrence. Multivariable regression was performed. RESULTS: Five institutions performed a fundoplication on 461 patients for GERD with a median of follow-up of 14.7 months (IQR 14.2). On multivariate analysis, patients with the chosen pre-operative comorbidities achieved comparable post-operative benefits. Patients with a BMI > 35 were not more likely to experience anatomic failure. Patients with pre-operative regurgitation had similar symptom recurrence rates to those without. Patients with non-cardiac chest pain had comparable rates of symptom recurrence to those without. Reporting a pre-operative chronic cough attributable to reflux was not associated with higher rates of post-operative symptom recurrence. DISCUSSION: Among the ICARUS guidelines and recommendations, a small proportion was lacking evidence at low risk for bias and endorsement. The results of this multicenter study evaluated outcomes of patients with various pre-operative conditions: BMI > 35, chest pain attributable to reflux, extra-esophageal symptoms attributable to reflux, and regurgitation. Our findings endorse patients with these characteristics as candidates for anti-reflux surgery.


Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Fundoplicación/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Dolor en el Pecho/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto
6.
Radiologie (Heidelb) ; 62(7): 563-569, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35768584

RESUMEN

DEFINITION: A hostile neck is defined by various anatomical conditions that describe a morphology of the proximal aneurysmal neck of infrarenal aortic aneurysms that is unfavorable for endovascular treatment (endovascular aortic repair, EVAR): proximal landing zone length ≤ 15 mm, angulation of the aortic neck > 60°, conical aortic neck, diameter of the aortic neck > 32 mm, and circumferential calcification/thrombus. EFFECTS ON OUTCOME: These morphological parameters are not only associated with a higher perioperative technical failure rate (primary type 1 endoleak) but also with poorer long-term results (secondary type 1 endoleak) and thus a higher reintervention rate in standard EVAR, so that standard EVAR should be reserved for a few exceptions in these cases. TREATMENT OPTIONS: Due to the rapid development of endovascular techniques in the last decade, we now have a variety of endovascular options for aneurysms with hostile necks, for both elective treatment and emergency care, in addition to conventional open surgery, which is still the standard method in many cases and is currently undergoing a renaissance: fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) as the method of first choice in the elective setting, EVAR with chimneys (ChEVAR), endosuture aneurysm repair (ESAR). An important option is the conservative approach, which can be a reasonable choice if the patient's preference is taken into account and a careful risk-benefit assessment is performed.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Dolor en el Pecho/cirugía , Endofuga/etiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 60(6): 841-846, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35307271

RESUMEN

Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multimodal cocktail intercostal injection for the relief of chest pain after costal cartilage harvest for rhinoplasty. Consecutive patients who underwent costal cartilage harvest during rhinoplasty were prospectively assigned as per patient preference to group A (injection containing ropivacaine, parecoxib sodium, epinephrine, and compound betamethasone), group B (intercostal nerve block (ICNB)), or group C (ICNB plus patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)). The outcomes were visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for chest pain after costal cartilage harvest, rescue analgesia, complications, and cost during the first two days. Of the 66 patients assessed, 63 (29 patients in group A, 13 in group B, and 21 in group C) were eligible and included. The VAS scores in group A were significantly lower than those in groups B and C (all p<0.001). Group A had a significantly lower rate of rescue analgesia due to a VAS score of more than 4 (3.45%, 1/29) compared with group B (46.15%, 6/13; p=0.001) and group C (28.57%, 6/21; p=0.012). Complications were observed only in group C (nausea/vomiting 28.57%; dizziness/headache 23.81%), which differed significantly from group A (p=0.002 and 0.006, respectively). The mean cost for group A (US $15 (0)) was significantly lower than it was for group C (US $113.1 (4.4), p<0.05), but higher than it was for group B (US $5.97 (0), p= -). Multimodal cocktail intercostal injection may be superior for chest pain relief after costal cartilage harvest for rhinoplasty compared with ICNB with or without PCA. Further study is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Cartílago Costal , Bloqueo Nervioso , Rinoplastia , Dolor en el Pecho/complicaciones , Dolor en el Pecho/cirugía , Cartílago Costal/cirugía , Humanos , Nervios Intercostales/cirugía , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos
10.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 48(3): 582-588, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34763951

RESUMEN

AIM: Compared to open esophagectomy (OE), both totally minimally invasive (TMIE) and laparoscopy-assisted hybrid minimally invasive (HMIE) reduce postoperative morbidity and improve short-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We aimed to compare lasting symptoms and long-term HRQoL in an international population-based setting between patients who underwent Ivor Lewis TMIE, HMIE or OE. METHODS: Patients who were relapse-free at least one year after TMIE, HMIE or OE for esophageal or junctional carcinoma between January 2010 and June 2016 were included. Patients completed the LASER questionnaire to assess lasting symptoms after esophagectomy and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25 questionnaires to assess HRQoL. Primary endpoint was chest pain and secondary endpoints were pain from chest scars or abdominal scars, abdominal pain, fatigue and physical functioning. Differences in lasting symptoms and HRQoL were assessed with multivariable logistic and ANCOVA regression, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 362 patients were included (TMIE n = 91, HMIE n = 85, OE n = 186). Median follow-up was 3.9 years (IQR 2.8-5.4). Chest pain was reported less after TMIE compared with HMIE (adjusted OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.84), but was comparable between TMIE and OE (adjusted OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.12-1.41) and between HMIE and OE (adjusted OR 1.85, 95% CI 0.71-4.81). All secondary endpoints were comparable between TMIE, HMIE and OE. The impact of symptoms on taking medication, return to work, and performance status were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Surgical technique seems to have little effect on lasting symptoms and long-term HRQoL after a median of four years after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Laparoscopía , Dolor en el Pecho/cirugía , Cicatriz/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 16(1): 134, 2021 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34001176

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stenosis at the opening and bifurcation of the anterior descending branch and circumflex branch around the end of the left main trunk is difficult to repair. Accurate positioning of a stent is the key problem. CASE PRESENTATIONS: Here we report the case of a 61-year-old man who suffered from paroxysmal chest pain for 1 year, without history of diabetes or hypertension. The coronary computed tomography showed mixed plaques in the proximal part of the anterior descending artery, with stenosis severe at 80-90%. The emergency coronary angiography showed occlusion of the anterior descending artery. During percutaneous coronary intervention, a drug-eluting stent was implanted into the anterior descending artery using the Szabo technique, supported by stent boost (StentBoost) imaging to pinpoint the location of the lesion. The patient's paroxysmal chest pain was relieved after the procedure. CONCLUSION: We used StentBoost to verify the accuracy of stent placement and the Szabo technique to rectify long-term coronary stenosis, which achieved satisfactory results. Combining the Szabo technique with StentBoost imaging was helpful to accurately evaluate the area and locate the stent when treating this ostial lesion of the anterior descending coronary artery.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Coronaria/fisiopatología , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Dolor en el Pecho/cirugía , Angiografía Coronaria , Reestenosis Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Pronóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Int J Surg Pathol ; 29(7): 764-769, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33749361

RESUMEN

Hamartomas are primary, benign neoplastic lesions that most commonly derive from a single variably differentiated cell lineage. Here, we report an unusual case of a cardiac hamartoma. A 62-year-old woman presented with chest pain and palpitations. Serial imaging revealed a large slowly growing and highly vascularized left ventricular mass, which required surgical resection. Microscopically, the lesion was composed of nodular fibrovascular proliferation with haphazardly embedded muscle bundles and peripheral calcifications. Immunohistochemical studies revealed prominent muscle-specific actin positive and smooth muscle actin positive muscle fiber bundles within a disorganized fibrovascular stroma. This characterization is most consistent with cardiac mesenchymal hamartoma. Relevant differential diagnoses for this lesion include hamartoma of mature cardiac myocytes (HMCMs) and intramuscular hemangioma. The prominent smooth muscle differentiation of muscle bundles was incompatible with defining features of HMCM. Absence of S100-positive nerve and mature adipose cells distinguished this lesion from the recently defined, heterogeneous cardiac mesenchymal hamartoma. Forty-seven cases of cardiac hamartoma reported from 1970 to 2020 were reviewed to provide histopathologic context.


Asunto(s)
Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Hamartoma/diagnóstico , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Ventrículos Cardíacos/patología , Dolor en el Pecho/cirugía , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Angiografía Coronaria , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Hamartoma/complicaciones , Hamartoma/patología , Hamartoma/cirugía , Cardiopatías/complicaciones , Cardiopatías/patología , Cardiopatías/cirugía , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ventrículos Cardíacos/cirugía , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad
14.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 20(3): 164-168, 2021 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33655998

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Slipping rib syndrome is pain created at the lower, anterior border of the rib cage when performing upper-extremity activities, coughing, laughing, or leaning over. Defects in the costal cartilage of ribs 8 to 10 result in increased movement of the ribs, impinging soft tissue and intercostal nerves. Advancements have been made in the diagnosis of slipping rib syndrome by dynamic ultrasound. Ultrasound can identify abnormalities in the rib and cartilage anatomy, as well as soft tissue swelling. Although the mainstays of treatment continue to be reassurance, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, intercostal nerve injections, osteopathic manipulative treatment, surgery for refractory pain, and botulinum toxin injections have been attempted, and there may be a role for prolotherapy in treatment. Surgical techniques are being examined secondary to recurrence of pain following resection. The hooking maneuver and surgery remain important for identification and treatment, respectively.


Asunto(s)
Costillas/diagnóstico por imagen , Costillas/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Dolor en el Pecho/cirugía , Dolor en el Pecho/terapia , Tratamiento Conservador , Humanos , Dolor Intratable/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor Intratable/etiología , Dolor Intratable/cirugía , Dolor Intratable/terapia , Recurrencia , Síndrome , Enfermedades Torácicas/etiología , Enfermedades Torácicas/terapia , Ultrasonografía
16.
BMJ Case Rep ; 13(9)2020 Sep 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32907864

RESUMEN

Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (TDR) is a rare yet life-threatening occurrence that remains a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. Delayed presentation with associated strangulation of the contents, although uncommon, requires emergent management. A 42-year-old woman presented with constant, severe left-sided shoulder and chest pain, as well as associated upper abdominal pain following a self-contained underwater breathing apparatus (SCUBA) dive. A chest radiograph (CXR) and CT showed a left-sided diaphragmatic hernia containing stomach. She subsequently underwent a laparoscopic repair of the diaphragmatic defect and recovered well postoperatively.


Asunto(s)
Diafragma/lesiones , Buceo/lesiones , Hernia Diafragmática Traumática/diagnóstico , Rotura/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Dolor Abdominal/cirugía , Adulto , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Dolor en el Pecho/cirugía , Diafragma/diagnóstico por imagen , Diafragma/cirugía , Femenino , Hernia Diafragmática Traumática/etiología , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Rotura/etiología , Rotura/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
17.
BMJ Case Rep ; 13(9)2020 Sep 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32907863

RESUMEN

A 77-year-old man with a history of coronary artery bypass grafting and surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis 2 years prior presented with exertional chest pain and shortness of breath. The patient underwent a thorough initial evaluation including a transthoracic echocardiogram and coronary angiogram without significant findings. One month later the patient presented with worsened symptoms and a repeat echocardiogram showed an increased mean aortic valve gradient of 87 mm Hg. The patient had to undergo reoperation for a surgical aortic valve replacement and was found to have an aortic bioprosthetic valve thrombus. This case suggests a mismatch between the aortic prosthesis and the patient's aortic root size.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Bioprótesis/efectos adversos , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Falla de Prótesis , Trombosis/diagnóstico , Anciano , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Dolor en el Pecho/cirugía , Angiografía Coronaria , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Disnea/etiología , Disnea/cirugía , Ecocardiografía Doppler en Color , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Humanos , Masculino , Reoperación , Trombosis/complicaciones , Trombosis/cirugía , Factores de Tiempo
18.
Esophagus ; 17(4): 468-476, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32248355

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Noncardiac chest pain often coexists with dysphagia in patients diagnosed with achalasia. The current standard treatment for achalasia, laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication, has an insufficient effect on noncardiac chest pain. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of circumferential Heller myotomy on esophageal chest pain in patients with achalasia. METHODS: Twenty patients diagnosed with achalasia who complained of noncardiac chest pain were recruited and underwent circumferential Heller myotomy. Using an institutional achalasia database, we randomly selected 60 patients who underwent standard laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication, based on a 3-to-1 propensity score-matching analysis. We compared surgical outcomes between the circumferential Heller myotomy and the laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication groups. RESULTS: Patients undergoing circumferential Heller myotomy had a higher rate of postoperative noncardiac chest pain relief than the laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication group [95% (19/20) vs. 75% (45/60), p = 0.045]. No differences in dysphagia and vomiting were found between groups (p = 0.783 and p = 0.645, respectively). Patients in the circumferential Heller myotomy group had significantly better esophageal clearance. The prevalence of reflux endoscopic esophagitis was higher in the circumferential Heller myotomy group than in the control group [35.0% (7/20) vs. 10.0% (6/60), p = 0.015]. CONCLUSIONS: There is promising early evidence that circumferential Heller myotomy may be effective in the treatment of achalasia-related chest pain. Further research, including larger randomized studies with long-term follow-up, is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Acalasia del Esófago/complicaciones , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Miotomía de Heller/métodos , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Dolor en el Pecho/cirugía , Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Acalasia del Esófago/diagnóstico , Esofagitis Péptica/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fundoplicación/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Heart Surg Forum ; 23(1): E058-E060, 2020 02 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32118544

RESUMEN

In recent decades, new information has arisen regarding sternal healing and extended indications for using rigid plate fixation in patients during cardio-thoracic procedures. Three randomized controlled multicenter clinical trials recently demonstrated positive results after rigid plate fixation, including reduced sternal complications and decreased length of hospital stay. However, redo-sternotomy after sternal reconstruction utilizing rigid fixation has not been previously delineated in surgical literature. This case highlights the technical challenges of performing a median sternotomy for cardiac surgery after sternal reconstruction with bilateral longitudinal plating.


Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Puente de Arteria Coronaria Off-Pump/métodos , Enfermedad Coronaria/cirugía , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Reoperación , Esternotomía/métodos , Anciano , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Dolor en el Pecho/cirugía , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Dolor Intratable/etiología , Dolor Intratable/cirugía , Esternón/lesiones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Técnicas de Cierre de Heridas , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía
20.
Diagn Interv Radiol ; 26(1): 53-57, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31904571

RESUMEN

PURPOSE Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome is a common condition affecting up to 50% of post-thoracotomy patients. However, percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided intercostal nerve cryoablation may provide symptomatic benefit in chronic and/or refractory cases. METHODS A retrospective review of our institution's comprehensive case log from October 2017 to September 2018 for patients who underwent cryoablation was analyzed. Thirteen patients with post-thoracotomy pain syndrome, refractory to medical management, were treated with CT-guided intercostal nerve cryoablation. Most patients had treatment of the intercostal nerve at the level of their thoracotomy scar, two levels above and below. The safety and technical success of this technique and the clinical outcomes of the study population were then retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS Of the patients, 69% experienced significant improvement in their pain symptoms with a median pain improvement score of 3 points (range, -1 to 8 points) over a median follow-up of 11 months (range, 2-18.6 months). Complications included pneumothorax in 8% and pseudohernia in 23% of patients. CONCLUSION CT-guided intercostal nerve cryoablation may be an effective technique in the treatment of post-thoracotomy pain syndrome and requires further study.


Asunto(s)
Dolor en el Pecho/cirugía , Criocirugía/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/cirugía , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Toracotomía/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...