RESUMEN
Purpose: Levodopa has been investigated as a therapeutic solution for ocular disorders involving dysregulation of the dopaminergic system, especially in the context of myopia. However, given the critical role dopamine plays in normal vision, this phase I trial examined whether levodopa/carbidopa eye drops induce any regional changes in retinal structure and function. Methods: Twenty-nine healthy male subjects 18 to 30 years of age were randomly assigned to receive either a low (1.4/0.34 µmoles/day, n = 14) or high (2.7/0.68 µmoles/day, n = 15) dose of levodopa/carbidopa eye drops in 1 eye for 28 consecutive days. A placebo solution was applied to all fellow eyes. Measures included visual acuity, regional frequency doubling perimetry, regional multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) and optical coherence tomography (retinal thickness). Outcome measures were undertaken at baseline, end-of-treatment (4 weeks), and at a follow-up (4 months post-treatment). Results: For low dose treated eyes, regional analysis showed a small, statistically significant change in mfERG recordings (increase in ring 5 amplitude in low dose treated eyes, P < 0.05) and the retinal thickness map (localized retinal thinning in low dose treated eyes, P < 0.05). These changes were not clinically significant. No significant changes were observed in high dose treated eyes. Pharmacokinetic analysis (rabbits) demonstrated that levodopa was not detectable within blood and peaked within the eye at 15 to 30 minutes (and eliminated within 4 hours). Conclusions: No clinically significant effects of levodopa/carbidopa eye drops were found with regard to normal retinal structure and function following short-term use. Translational Relevance: This study further demonstrates the safety of topical levodopa, which may support its use in the treatment of ocular disorders in which the dopamine system is dysregulated.
Asunto(s)
Carbidopa , Electrorretinografía , Levodopa , Soluciones Oftálmicas , Retina , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Levodopa/administración & dosificación , Levodopa/farmacología , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Masculino , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Retina/efectos de los fármacos , Retina/diagnóstico por imagen , Retina/patología , Retina/metabolismo , Carbidopa/administración & dosificación , Carbidopa/farmacología , Carbidopa/efectos adversos , Agudeza Visual/efectos de los fármacos , Soluciones Oftálmicas/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Electrorretinografía/efectos de los fármacos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Método Doble Ciego , Pruebas del Campo Visual , Dopaminérgicos/administración & dosificación , Dopaminérgicos/farmacología , Dopaminérgicos/farmacocinética , Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
We report on a patient with ciltacabtagene autoleucel-induced movement and neurocognitive toxicity, which was refractory to immunosuppression but responsive to combination dopaminergic therapy (carbidopa/levodopa, ropinirole, amantadine). Response was seen upon both initial treatment and rechallenge after unintended withdrawal. This is the first report of a successful symptomatic treatment of this well-described neurotoxic syndrome.
Asunto(s)
Carbidopa , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Levodopa , Humanos , Carbidopa/administración & dosificación , Levodopa/administración & dosificación , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/inducido químicamente , Combinación de Medicamentos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Amantadina/administración & dosificación , Amantadina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dopaminérgicos/administración & dosificación , Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Quimioterapia Combinada , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Indoles/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Dopamina/administración & dosificación , Agonistas de Dopamina/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Antiparkinsonianos/administración & dosificación , Antiparkinsonianos/efectos adversos , Productos Biológicos/administración & dosificación , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/inmunologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cognitive dysfunction is a non-motor manifestation of Parkinson's disease (PD). We aimed to determine the frequency and patterns of cognitive dysfunction in treated patients with PD and their predictors. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study included 80 patients (male = 48; female = 32) and 30 healthy individuals. They underwent neuropsychiatric evaluations. Measurements included Beck's depression inventory - II (BDI-II), mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA). RESULTS: Patients had mean age of 55.56 ± 9.06 yrs, duration of PD of 4.86 ± 2.71 yrs and Hoehn and Yahr Scoring of 2.19 ± 0.89. They were on levodopa/carbidopa therapy and adjuvant therapy with benztropine mesylate, an anticholinergic drug, (n = 51) or amantadine sulfate, a dopaminergic drug, (n = 29). Sixteen (20%) had moderate depressive symptoms. Mild and moderate cognitive impairments were reported in 38.8% and 28.8% (by MMSE) and 46.3% and 31.3% (by MoCA). Patients had lower global cognitive scoring (p = 0.0001) and scorings of different cognitive functions (naming, attention, language, abstraction, memory and orientation) than controls. Patients treated with benztropine had lower cognition than with amantadine. Correlation analyses showed that lower cognition was only associated with chronic PD and its treatment (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive dysfunction is common with PD (77.5%) particularly with anticholinergic drugs. De-prescription of anticholinergics is recommended for patients with PD.
Asunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos , Antagonistas Colinérgicos , Disfunción Cognitiva , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Antiparkinsonianos/administración & dosificación , Antiparkinsonianos/farmacología , Antiparkinsonianos/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Egipto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Levodopa/administración & dosificación , Levodopa/farmacología , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Adulto , Amantadina/administración & dosificación , Amantadina/farmacología , Amantadina/efectos adversos , Carbidopa/administración & dosificación , Carbidopa/farmacología , Carbidopa/efectos adversos , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Combinación de Medicamentos , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/epidemiología , Benzotropina/farmacología , Benzotropina/administración & dosificación , Benzotropina/efectos adversos , Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Dopaminérgicos/administración & dosificación , Dopaminérgicos/farmacología , Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression following traumatic brain injury. METHODS: Secondary outcome data from a randomized controlled multisite trial of amantadine 100 mg twice daily were used to calculate number-needed-to-treat (NNT). Given prior findings of positive clinician-perceived effects and low incidence of adverse events, we hypothesized low number-needed-to-treat for benefit (NNTB; high benefit) and high number-needed-to-treat for harm (NNTH; low risk) based on the clinician ratings, supporting the use of amantadine in clinical practice. Specifically, NNTB values were calculated using number of individuals with improvement on the Clinician Global Impressions-Global Improvement scale (GI). NNTH values were computed using number of individuals with worsening on the GI and experiencing serious and any adverse events. RESULTS: Based on clinician ratings, on average for every six patients treated with amantadine rather than placebo, one extra patient would be expected to improve (NNTB = 6.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [3.3-76.8]). More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group, but the result was not statistically significant (NNTH = -92.4; 95% CI: [NNTB -32.9 to infinity to NNTH -19.2]). The amantadine and placebo groups did not differ on the numbers of adverse events experienced during the trial. CONCLUSION: Clinician ratings suggest modest benefit of amantadine 100 mg twice daily with low risk to appropriately selected patients with adequate renal clearance. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression.
Asunto(s)
Agresión , Amantadina , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Genio Irritable , Humanos , Amantadina/uso terapéutico , Amantadina/administración & dosificación , Amantadina/efectos adversos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/tratamiento farmacológico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Agresión/efectos de los fármacos , Genio Irritable/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Medición de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dopaminérgicos/administración & dosificación , Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Dopaminérgicos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Método Doble Ciego , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a DrogaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Sleep disorders are common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and significantly impact quality of life. Herein, we surveyed the incidence and severity of sleep disorders in Chinese PD patients and observed their relationship with dopaminergic drugs. METHODS: We collected the demographic and disease information of 232 PD patients. The incidence and severity of sleep disorders were surveyed with the Parkinson's disease sleep scale (PDSS) Chinese version. Data on dopaminergic drug intake were collected and converted to levodopa equivalent doses (LED). RESULTS: The average total score of PDSS in 232 patients was 119.3 ± 19.7. There was a significant difference in PDSS scores between groups classified by the Hoehn-Yahr (H&Y) stage, but not between the groups classified by the type of dopaminergic drugs. Stepwise regression analysis revealed that the LED of dopaminergic drugs taken before bedtime (p < 0.00), LED of dopaminergic drugs taken over a 24-h period (p < 0.00), and scores of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) (p = 0.01) were determinants of PDSS. CONCLUSION: Sleep disorders in PD patients may be multifactorial. High dosage of dopaminergic drugs taken prior to sleep, daily total high dosage of dopaminergic drugs, and depression exert negative effects on subjective sleep. The timing and dosage of dopaminergic drugs taken before bedtime should be considered in PD management.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/epidemiología , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/etiología , Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Sueño , LevodopaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Iron content is increased in the substantia nigra of persons with Parkinson's disease and may contribute to the pathophysiology of the disorder. Early research suggests that the iron chelator deferiprone can reduce nigrostriatal iron content in persons with Parkinson's disease, but its effects on disease progression are unclear. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, phase 2, randomized, double-blind trial involving participants with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease who had never received levodopa. Participants were assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive oral deferiprone at a dose of 15 mg per kilogram of body weight twice daily or matched placebo for 36 weeks. Dopaminergic therapy was withheld unless deemed necessary for symptom control. The primary outcome was the change in the total score on the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS; range, 0 to 260, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment) at 36 weeks. Secondary and exploratory clinical outcomes at up to 40 weeks included measures of motor and nonmotor disability. Brain iron content measured with the use of magnetic resonance imaging was also an exploratory outcome. RESULTS: A total of 372 participants were enrolled; 186 were assigned to receive deferiprone and 186 to receive placebo. Progression of symptoms led to the initiation of dopaminergic therapy in 22.0% of the participants in the deferiprone group and 2.7% of those in the placebo group. The mean MDS-UPDRS total score at baseline was 34.3 in the deferiprone group and 33.2 in the placebo group and increased (worsened) by 15.6 points and 6.3 points, respectively (difference, 9.3 points; 95% confidence interval, 6.3 to 12.2; P<0.001). Nigrostriatal iron content decreased more in the deferiprone group than in the placebo group. The main serious adverse events with deferiprone were agranulocytosis in 2 participants and neutropenia in 3 participants. CONCLUSIONS: In participants with early Parkinson's disease who had never received levodopa and in whom treatment with dopaminergic medications was not planned, deferiprone was associated with worse scores in measures of parkinsonism than those with placebo over a period of 36 weeks. (Funded by the European Union Horizon 2020 program; FAIRPARK-II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02655315.).
Asunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos , Deferiprona , Quelantes del Hierro , Hierro , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Sustancia Negra , Humanos , Deferiprona/administración & dosificación , Deferiprona/efectos adversos , Deferiprona/farmacología , Deferiprona/uso terapéutico , Hierro/análisis , Hierro/metabolismo , Levodopa/uso terapéutico , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/metabolismo , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Quelantes del Hierro/administración & dosificación , Quelantes del Hierro/efectos adversos , Quelantes del Hierro/farmacología , Quelantes del Hierro/uso terapéutico , Sustancia Negra/química , Sustancia Negra/diagnóstico por imagen , Sustancia Negra/efectos de los fármacos , Sustancia Negra/metabolismo , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Administración Oral , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Química Encefálica , Dopaminérgicos/administración & dosificación , Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Dopaminérgicos/farmacología , Dopaminérgicos/uso terapéutico , Antiparkinsonianos/administración & dosificación , Antiparkinsonianos/efectos adversos , Antiparkinsonianos/farmacología , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Parkinson's disease (PD) is commonly treated with dopaminergic medication, which enhances some, while impairing other cognitive functions. It can even contribute to impulse control disorder and addiction. We describe the history of research supporting the dopamine overdose hypothesis, which accounts for the large within-patient variability in dopaminergic medication effects across different tasks by referring to the spatially non-uniform pattern of dopamine depletion in dorsal versus ventral striatum. However, there is tremendous variability in dopaminergic medication effects not just within patients across distinct tasks, but also across different patients. In the second part of this chapter we review recent studies addressing the large individual variability in the negative side effects of dopaminergic medication on functions that implicate dopamine, such as value-based learning and choice. These studies begin to unravel the mechanisms of dopamine overdosing, thus revising the strict version of the overdose hypothesis. For example, the work shows that the canonical boosting of reward-versus punishment-based choice by medication is greater in patients with depression and a non-tremor phenotype, which both implicate, among other pathology, more rather than less severe dysregulation of the mesolimbic dopamine system. Future longitudinal cohort studies are needed to identify how to optimally combine different clinical, personality, cognitive, neural, genetic and molecular predictors of detrimental medication effects in order to account for as much of the relevant variability as possible. This will provide a useful tool for precision neurology, allowing individual and contextual tailoring of (the dose of) dopaminergic medication in order to maximize its cognitive benefits, yet minimize its side effects.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Disfunción Cognitiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Dopamina , Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , RecompensaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dopamine receptor agonist drugs, which are used, for example, to treat Parkinson's disease (PD), increase the risk for impulse control disorders (ICDs), potentially resulting in devastating psychosocial consequences. It is unknown whether other drugs with dopaminergic properties also increase the risk for ICDs. This study assesses the disproportionality of reporting ICDs between drugs with dopaminergic properties and selected non-dopaminergic drugs. METHODS: A case/non-case disproportionality analysis was performed, using data from VigiBase (1968-2020). Reports on ICDs as suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were cases (n=852), and those with ADRs other than ICDs were non-cases (n=281,720). Relative reporting frequencies were expressed as adjusted reporting odds ratios (aRORs). Within the dopamine receptor agonists, the relationship between reporting odds ratios and dopamine receptor occupancy was explored. RESULTS: A high disproportionality was found for reporting ICDs for all dopaminergic drugs (aROR 20.4 [95% CI 17.4-24.1]) compared to non-dopaminergic drugs. In pharmacotherapeutic subgroups, a high disproportionality was found for primary dopaminergic agents used in PD (aROR 52.1 [95% CI 44.1-61.5]), and to a lesser extent for ADHD psychostimulants and antidepressants (aROR 5.8 [95% 4.1-8.3] and aROR 3.9 [95% CI 2.9-5.6], respectively). There was no difference in reporting by consumers and healthcare professionals. The highest disproportionality was found for the dopamine receptor agonists pramipexole and ropinirole. CONCLUSIONS: A signal of disproportion in ICD occurrence was found among all investigated drugs with dopaminergic properties, highlighting the importance of counselling and monitoring for ICDs when prescribing dopaminergic drugs.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Disruptivos, del Control de Impulso y de la Conducta , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Trastornos Disruptivos, del Control de Impulso y de la Conducta/inducido químicamente , Trastornos Disruptivos, del Control de Impulso y de la Conducta/epidemiología , Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Dopamina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiología , Pramipexol/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Prolactinomas are the most frequent pituitary adenomas. Prolactinoma may occur in different clinical settings and always require an individually tailored approach. This is the reason why a panel of Italian neuroendocrine experts was charged with the task to provide indications for the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches that can be easily applied in different contexts. The document provides 15 recommendations for diagnosis and 54 recommendations for treatment, issued according to the GRADE system. The level of agreement among panel members was formally evaluated by RAND-UCLA methodology. In the last century, prolactinomas represented the paradigm of pituitary tumors for which the development of highly effective drugs obtained the best results, allowing to avoid neurosurgery in most cases. The impressive improvement of neurosurgical endoscopic techniques allows a far better definition of the tumoral tissue during surgery and the remission of endocrine symptoms in many patients with pituitary tumors. Consequently, this refinement of neurosurgery is changing the therapeutic strategy in prolactinomas, allowing the definitive cure of some patients with permanent discontinuation of medical therapy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hipofisarias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/terapia , Prolactinoma/diagnóstico , Prolactinoma/terapia , Niño , Consenso , Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Dopaminérgicos/uso terapéutico , Endocrinología , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperprolactinemia/etiología , Hiperprolactinemia/terapia , Italia , Masculino , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/etiología , Embarazo , Prolactinoma/etiología , RadioterapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Augmentation is a paradoxical reaction mainly to dopaminergic medication in patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS), but the exact pathomechanism remains unclear. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with augmentation in RLS patients. METHODS: RLS patients with and without current or previous augmentation were recruited. Demographic characteristics, history of smoking, questionnaires for depression, alexithymia, and impulsivity, and RLS severity were obtained. RESULTS: We included 122 patients, of whom half had a history of augmentation. Patients with augmentation had a longer disease duration (p = 0.001), had higher RLS severity scores (p = 0.013), had higher levodopa equivalent doses (p < 0.001), had higher scores for alexithymia (p = 0.028), had higher prevalence of impulse control disorders (p < 0.001), more often had a history of smoking (p = 0.039), were more often currently smoking (p = 0.015), and had more average pack-years (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Here, we describe several factors commonly associated with augmentation in RLS. These may help clinicians to screen and treat patients carefully to avoid the challenging side effect of augmentation.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Disruptivos, del Control de Impulso y de la Conducta , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas , Trastornos Disruptivos, del Control de Impulso y de la Conducta/complicaciones , Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas/tratamiento farmacológico , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To review the current evidence on the options available for initiating dopaminergic treatment of motor symptoms in early-stage Parkinson disease and provide recommendations to clinicians. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel developed practice recommendations, integrating findings from a systematic review and following an Institute of Medicine-compliant process to ensure transparency and patient engagement. Recommendations were supported by structured rationales, integrating evidence from the systematic review, related evidence, principles of care, and inferences from evidence. RESULTS: Initial treatment with levodopa provides superior motor benefit compared to treatment with dopamine agonists, whereas levodopa is more likely than dopamine agonists to cause dyskinesia. The comparison of different formulations of dopamine agonists yielded little evidence that any one formulation or method of administration is superior. Long-acting forms of levodopa and levodopa with entacapone do not appear to differ in efficacy from immediate-release levodopa for motor symptoms in early disease. There is a higher risk of impulse control disorders associated with the use of dopamine agonists than levodopa. Recommendations on initial therapy for motor symptoms are provided to assist the clinician and patient in choosing between treatment options and to guide counseling, prescribing, and monitoring of efficacy and safety.
Asunto(s)
Dopaminérgicos , Actividad Motora , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Dopaminérgicos/uso terapéutico , Agonistas de Dopamina/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos , Humanos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Levodopa/uso terapéutico , Actividad Motora/fisiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Levodopa-induced dyskinesia frequently complicates long-term Parkinson's disease. More in-depth knowledge regarding the role of genetic factors in dyskinesia development may be important to identify parkinsonian patients who are more prone to developing dyskinesia and clarify the molecular mechanisms underlying this condition. For this reason, we systematically reviewed studies investigating genetic factors involved in dyskinesia. METHODS: A systematic search of genetic factors in Parkinson's disease dyskinesia was performed using the MEDLINE (through PubMed up to June 2019) and EMBASE databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random effect model. RESULTS: The literature search retrieved 33 studies assessing genes and variants possibly associated with dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease. The studies were published between 1984 and 2019 and included a total of 27,092 subjects of different ethnicities. Overall, 37 genes were analyzed in the studies reviewed, of which 22 were possibly associated with dyskinesia. The studies reported a total of 158 variants, of which 94 were possibly related to dyskinesia. CONCLUSION: The studies reviewed demonstrated inconsistent results, possibly due to differences in screening methods and in the comparison of clinical data in a large variety of genetically- and ethnically-diverse populations. The meta-analysis failed to demonstrate any association between the rs6280 in the DRD3 gene, rs1799836 in the MAO-B, rs4680 in the COMT gene, rs34637584 in the LRRK2 gene and LID susceptibility. The role of genetic factors in LID susceptibility is still unclear and further studies are required.
Asunto(s)
Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/genética , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/genética , HumanosAsunto(s)
Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Distonía/inducido químicamente , Trastornos del Movimiento/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Movimiento/etiología , Espasmo/inducido químicamente , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dopaminérgicos/administración & dosificación , Distonía/diagnóstico por imagen , Electroencefalografía , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Espasmo/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Parkinson's Disease (PD) is symptomatically managed with L-DOPA but chronic use results in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID) characterized by abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs). In LID, dopamine D3 receptors (D3R) are upregulated on D1 receptor (D1R)-bearing medium spiny neurons where the can synergistically drive downstream signaling and motor behaviors. Despite evidence implying D1R-D3R cooperativity in LID, the dyskinesiogenic role of D3R has never been directly tested. To this end, we developed a specific cre-dependent microRNA (miRNA) to irreversibly prevent D3R upregulation in D1R striatal cells. D1-Cre rats received unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesions. Three weeks later, rats received an adeno-associated virus expressing either D3R miRNA or a scrambled (SCR) miRNA delivered into the striatum. After 4 weeks, rats received chronic L-DOPA (6 mg/kg) or vehicle. AIMs development and motor behaviors were assayed throughout treatment. At the conclusion of the experiment, efficacy and fidelity of the miRNA strategy was analyzed using in situ hybridization (ISH). ISH analyses demonstrated that D1R+/D3R+ cells were upregulated in LID and that the selective D3R miRNA reduced D1R+/D3R+ co-expression. Importantly, silencing of D3R also significantly attenuated LID development without impacting L-DOPA efficacy or other locomotion. These data highlight a dyskinesiogenic role of D3R within D1R cells in LID and highlight aberrant D1R-D3R interactions as targets of LID management.
Asunto(s)
Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/genética , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/prevención & control , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Neostriado/patología , Receptores de Dopamina D1/genética , Receptores de Dopamina D3/genética , Animales , Conducta Animal , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/psicología , Femenino , Terapia Genética , Hidroxidopaminas , Masculino , MicroARNs/genética , Neostriado/metabolismo , Desempeño Psicomotor , RatasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Long-term treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) with l-DOPA typically leads to development of l-DOPA induced dyskinesia (LID). Amantadine, an NMDA antagonist, attenuates LID, but with limited efficacy and considerable side-effects. NLX-112 (also known as befiradol or F13640), a highly selective and efficacious 5-HT1A receptor agonist, reduced LID when tested in rodent and marmoset models of PD. METHODS: The effects of NLX-112 (0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg PO) on established LID evoked by acute challenge with l-DOPA (27.5 ± 3.8 mg/kg PO) were assessed in MPTP-treated cynomolgus macaques. Amantadine (10 mg/kg PO) was tested as a positive control. Plasma exposure of NLX-112 (0.1 mg/kg PO) was determined. RESULTS: NLX-112 significantly and dose-dependently reduced median LID levels by up to 96% during the first hour post-administration (0.3 mg/kg). Moreover, NLX-112 reduced the duration of 'bad on-time' associated with disabling LID by up to 48% (0.3 mg/kg). In contrast, NLX-112 had negligible impact on the anti-parkinsonian benefit of l-DOPA. NLX-112 exposure peaked at ~50 ng/ml at 30 min post-administration but decreased to ~15 ng/ml at 2h. Amantadine reduced by 42% 'bad on-time' associated with l-DOPA, thereby validating the model. CONCLUSION: These data show that, in MPTP-lesioned cynomolgus macaques, NLX-112 exerts robust anti-dyskinetic effects, without reducing the anti-parkinsonian benefit of l-DOPA. These observations complement previous findings and suggest that selective and high efficacy activation of 5-HT1A receptors by NLX-112 may constitute a promising approach to combat LID in PD, providing an alternative for patients in whom amantadine is poorly tolerated or without useful effect.
Asunto(s)
Amantadina/farmacología , Dopaminérgicos/farmacología , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Levodopa/farmacología , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/farmacología , Piridinas/farmacología , Agonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT1/farmacología , Amantadina/administración & dosificación , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/etiología , Femenino , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Macaca fascicularis , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/farmacocinética , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/farmacocinética , Agonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT1/administración & dosificación , Agonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT1/farmacocinéticaRESUMEN
Background: Multiple system atrophy (MSA) may develop levodopa-induced dyskinesia, which is dystonic and predominant in the orofacial region. We aimed to characterize the patterns of presynaptic dopaminergic degeneration in patients with MSA and dyskinesia using 123I-N-x-fluoropropyl-2b-carbo-methoxy-3b-(4-iodophenyl) nortropan single-photon emission computed tomography (123I-FP-CIT SPECT). Methods: A single center cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted using consecutive chart review of patients with probable MSA who underwent 123I-FP-CIT SPECT. The degeneration patterns were compared between the groups with and without dyskinesia via visual assessment of 123I-FP-CIT SPECT images. Results: Twenty-five patients with probable MSA who had undergone dopamine transporter imaging were identified (age [mean ± standard error], 62.5 ± 1.7 years; disease duration, 48.8 ± 7.0 months). Four of them presented dyskinesia and 21 of patients did not. Twenty-five patients with MSA were visually classified into five grades: one Grade 1 (normal), two Grade 2 (eagle wing), three Grade 3 (mixed), nine Grade 4 (egg shape), and ten Grade 5 (burst striatum). All patients with MSA and dyskinesia were classified into Grade 5. Visual grading significantly correlated with disease duration and levodopa responsiveness. Conclusions: Severe presynaptic dopaminergic dysfunction in 123I-FP-CIT SPECT images, higher doses of dopaminergic medication, and longer disease durations were associated with occurrence of levodopa-induced dyskinesia, even in MSA.
Asunto(s)
Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Proteínas de Transporte de Dopamina a través de la Membrana Plasmática/metabolismo , Neuronas Dopaminérgicas/metabolismo , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/diagnóstico por imagen , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Atrofia de Múltiples Sistemas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neostriado/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atrofia de Múltiples Sistemas/diagnóstico por imagen , Atrofia de Múltiples Sistemas/metabolismo , Neostriado/metabolismo , Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas/metabolismo , Terminales Presinápticos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único , TropanosRESUMEN
Background: The impact of slight-to-moderate levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) on the level of participation in active life in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) has never been objectively determined. Methods: Levels of LID, tremor and bradykinesia were measured during best-ON state in 121 patients diagnosed with PD and having peak-dose LID using inertial sensors positioned on each body limb. Rigidity and postural instability were assessed using clinical evaluations. Cognition and depression were assessed using the MMSE and the GDS-15. Participation in active life was assessed in patients and in 69 healthy controls using the Activity Card Sort (ACS), which measures levels of activity engagement and activities affected by the symptomatology. Outcome measures were compared between patients and controls using ANCOVA, controlling for age or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests. Spearman correlations and multivariate analyses were then performed between symptomatology and ACS scores. Results: Patients had significantly lower activity engagement than controls and had significantly affected activities. LID was neither associated with activity engagement nor affected activities. Higher levels of tremor, postural instability, cognitive decline and depression were associated with lower activity engagement and higher affected activities. Multivariate analyses revealed that only tremor, postural instability and depression accounted significantly in the variances of these variables. Discussion: Slight-to-moderate LID had little impact compared to other symptoms on the level of participation in active life, suggesting that other symptoms should remain the treatment priority to maintain the level of participation of patients in an active lifestyle.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Participación Social , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/etiología , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/fisiopatología , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/psicologíaRESUMEN
Acetylcholine muscarinic receptors (mAChRs) contribute to both the facilitation and inhibition of levodopa-induced dyskinesia operated by striatal cholinergic interneurons, although the receptor subtypes involved remain elusive. Cholinergic afferents from the midbrain also innervate the substantia nigra reticulata, although the role of nigral mAChRs in levodopa-induced dyskinesia is unknown. Here, we investigate whether striatal and nigral M1 and/or M4 mAChRs modulate dyskinesia and the underlying striato-nigral GABAergic pathway activation in 6-hydroxydopamine hemilesioned rats. Reverse microdialysis allowed to deliver the mAChR antagonists telenzepine (M1 subtype preferring), PD-102807 and tropicamide (M4 subtype preferring), as well as the selective M4 mAChR positive allosteric modulator VU0152100 in striatum or substantia nigra, while levodopa was administered systemically. Dyskinetic movements were monitored along with nigral GABA (and glutamate) and striatal glutamate dialysate levels, taken as neurochemical correlates of striato-nigral pathway and cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop activation. We observed that intrastriatal telenzepine, PD-102807 and tropicamide alleviated dyskinesia and inhibited nigral GABA and striatal glutamate release. This was partially replicated by intrastriatal VU0152100. The M2 subtype preferring antagonist AFDX-116, used to elevate striatal acetylcholine levels, blocked the behavioral and neurochemical effects of PD-102807. Intranigral VU0152100 prevented levodopa-induced dyskinesia and its neurochemical correlates whereas PD-102807 was ineffective. These results suggest that striatal, likely postsynaptic, M1 mAChRs facilitate dyskinesia and striato-nigral pathway activation in vivo. Conversely, striatal M4 mAChRs can both facilitate and inhibit dyskinesia, possibly depending on their localization. Potentiation of striatal and nigral M4 mAChR transmission leads to powerful multilevel inhibition of striato-nigral pathway and attenuation of dyskinesia.
Asunto(s)
Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/metabolismo , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Neostriado/metabolismo , Receptor Muscarínico M1/metabolismo , Receptor Muscarínico M4/metabolismo , Sustancia Negra/metabolismo , Regulación Alostérica , Animales , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/etiología , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/fisiopatología , Ácido Glutámico/efectos de los fármacos , Ácido Glutámico/metabolismo , Microdiálisis , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/farmacología , Neostriado/efectos de los fármacos , Vías Nerviosas , Oxidopamina/toxicidad , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/etiología , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/metabolismo , Ratas , Receptor Muscarínico M1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptor Muscarínico M4/antagonistas & inhibidores , Sustancia Negra/efectos de los fármacos , Simpaticolíticos/toxicidad , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico/efectos de los fármacos , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The most common psychiatric complications due to dopaminergic treatment in Parkinson's disease are visual hallucinations and impulse control disorders. Their development depends on clinical and genetic factors. METHODS: We evaluated the simultaneous effect of 16 clinical and 34 genetic variables on the occurrence of visual hallucinations and impulse control disorders. Altogether, 214 Parkinson's disease patients were enrolled. Their demographic, clinical, and genotype data were obtained. Clinical and clinical-pharmacogenetic models were built by The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator penalized logistic regression. The predictive capacity was evaluated with the cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: The clinical-pharmacogenetic index for prediction of visual hallucinations encompassed age at diagnosis (OR = 0.99), rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (OR = 2.27), depression (OR = 1.0002), IL6 rs1800795 (OR = 0.99), GPX1 s1050450 (OR = 1.07), COMT rs165815 (OR = 0.69), MAOB rs1799836 (OR = 0.97), DRD3 rs6280 (OR = 1.32), and BIRC5 rs8073069 (OR = 0.94). The clinical-pharmacogenetic index for prediction of impulse control disorders encompassed age at diagnosis (OR = 0.95), depression (OR = 1.75), beta-blockers (OR = 0.99), coffee consumption (OR = 0.97), NOS1 rs2682826 (OR = 1.15), SLC6A3 rs393795 (OR = 1.27), SLC22A1 rs628031 (OR = 1.19), DRD2 rs1799732 (OR = 0.88), DRD3 rs6280 (OR = 0.88), and NRG1 rs3924999 (OR = 0.96). The cross-validated AUCs of clinical and clinical-pharmacogenetic models for visual hallucinations were 0.60 and 0.59, respectively. The AUCs of clinical and clinical-pharmacogenetic models for impulse control disorders were 0.72 and 0.71, respectively. The AUCs show that the addition of selected genetic variables to the analysis does not contribute to better prediction of visual hallucinations and impulse control disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Models could be improved by a larger cohort and by addition of other types of Parkinson's disease biomarkers to the analysis.