Efficacy of Shensong Yangxin capsule combined with dronedarone in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after ablation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether postoperative administration of Shensong Yangxin capsules (SSYX) and dronedarone for atrial fibrillation (AF) can reduce the recurrence of paroxysmal AF after radiofrequency ablation, thus providing a more optimal choice of antiarrhythmic medication during the blank period. METHODS: We included 120 patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent radiofrequency ablation at our hospital between July 2020 and July 2022. They underwent routine circumferential pulmonary vein ablation and, subsequently, left and right atrial pressure monitoring to assess sinoatrial node recovery time under burst 400/300 ms stimulation. Postoperatively, the patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (60 patients each). The control group was administered dronedarone orally for 3 months and the study group was treated with SSYX combined with dronedarone. This study aimed to compare differences in clinical efficacy of the treatment between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The left and right atrial pressures in both groups were higher than those in the preoperative period (P < .05), with no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (P > .05). Sinoatrial node recovery time under burst 400/300 ms stimulation showed no statistical difference between the 2 groups (P > .05). At 3 months and 1 year postoperatively, the AFEQT scale scores for both groups were lower than those before treatment (P < .05), with the study group scoring lower than the control group at 3 months (P < .05). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups at 1 year postoperatively (P > .05). At 3 months postoperatively, the sinus rhythm maintenance rate and heart rate were higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P < .05); however, these differences between the 2 groups were not statistically significant at 1 year postoperatively (P > .05). CONCLUSION SUBSECTIONS: The combination of SSYX and dronedarone could effectively reduce the early recurrence of paroxysmal AF after radiofrequency ablation, increase heart rate, and improve the quality of life.

Exploratory Evaluation of Rhythm Control by Dronedarone in Combination With Low-Dose Rivaroxaban, Warfarin, Antiplatelet, or None of the Antithrombotic Therapy in High-Risk Patients With Non-Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The emerging data supports rhythm control to prevent major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Limited data demonstrated rivaroxaban 10 mg combining dronedarone seemed feasible. This study aimed at investigating clinical events in a dronedarone-treated cohort. This exploratory, retrospective chart review was conducted in nonpermanent AF patients receiving dronedarone for ≥ 3 months between 2009/1 and 2016/2. In Taiwan, dronedarone's labeled indication was strict to age ≥ 70 or 65 to 70 years with either hypertension, diabetes, prior stroke, or left atrium >50 mm. We divided all into 4 groups using antithrombotic strategies to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and MACE endpoints. A total of 689 patients (mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 3.8 ± 1.4) were analyzed: rivaroxaban 10 mg (n = 93, 13.5%), warfarin (n = 89, 12.9%), antiplatelet (n = 331, 48.0%), and none (n = 176, 25.5%). During the follow-up period (mean 946 ± 493.8 days), the rivaroxaban group did not report any stroke or thromboembolism (ishcmeic stroke rate: antiplatelet [0.6%], none [1.1%]; hemorrahgic stroke rate: warfarin [2.2%]; thromboembolism rate: warfarin [2.2%]). There was no significant difference in safety, effectiveness, and MACE endpoints between groups. Also, >104 weeks of dronedarone use was the independent predictor for MACE after adjusting the strategy and other covariates (hazard ratio 0.14 [95% confidence interval 0.04-0.44], P = .001). Our findings warrant concomitant rivaroxaban 10 mg and dronedarone for further investigation. Regardless of antithrombotic strategies, a more extended persistence of dronedarone was associated with fewer MACE.

In vitro behavior of dronedarone hydrochloride loaded pellets using vacuum impregnation technique.

Pharmaceutical pellets are a versatile and adaptable drug carrier system with pharmacological and technological advantages specific to multiparticulate delivery systems. Depending on their porosity and formulation procedure, a controlled drug release pattern can be achieved using a variety of pellet production and drug loading techniques. In the present paper, we have developed microcrystalline cellulose based porous pellets by extrusion/spheronization process. Two types of dronedarone hydrochloride suspensions were prepared in order to load drug onto carrier pellets using vacuum impregnation method. Despite its extensive use in the biomedical field of research, this technique hasn't been applied yet as means of incorporating drugs into inert and porous pellets. In addition, drug release control was tested by spray coating the pellets with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose in a fluidized bed. Pellet morphology, porosity and dissolution behavior were determined and the results indicate that DNR particle size affects the drug incorporation mechanism and, therefore, drug release patterns obtained through in vitro tests. Additionally, it was proven that polymer-based film-coat significantly slows down the drug release from the pellets. In vitro studies of the coated pellets in biorelevant fluids have shown that DNR release profiles are directly related to the type of dissolution media used. Vacuum impregnation was found to be promising technique for incorporation of DNR onto the surface of the porous pellets and into their pores.

An exploratory analysis of effects of poyendarone, a deuterated analogue of dronedarone, on the canine model of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Poyendarone, a deuterated analogue of dronedarone, is expected to reduce the onset of cardiovascular adverse events of dronedarone, including congestive heart failure and excessive QT-interval prolongation. Since information is still lacking on the anti-atrial fibrillatory property of poyendarone, we assessed it along with effects on the inter-atrial conduction time (IACT) and atrial effective refractory period (AERP) using the canine paroxysmal atrial fibrillation model. Poyendarone hydrochloride (n = 4) and dronedarone hydrochloride (n = 4) in intravenous doses of 0.3 and 3 mg/kg/30 s were cumulatively administered. Poyendarone hardly altered sinoatrial rate, but dronedarone decreased it in a dose-related manner, whereas both drugs slightly but significantly reduced idioventricular rate. Poyendarone shortened duration of burst pacing-induced atrial fibrillation, whereas such abbreviation was not observed by dronedarone. Poyendarone and dronedarone similarly prolonged IACT in a frequency-dependent manner, indicating that their INa inhibitory actions may be similar. The high dose of poyendarone prolonged AERP in a reverse frequency-dependent manner, extent of which at basic pacing cycle lengths of 300 and 400 ms was comparable to that of dronedarone. However, the extent at a basic pacing cycle length of 200 ms was tended to be greater in poyendarone than in dronedarone, suggesting greater IKs inhibitory action of poyendarone. The deuteration of dronedarone attenuated the inhibition of sinus automaticity and prolonged the AERP with keeping the blood pressure and ventricular rate stable. Thus, poyendarone may have both more potent anti-atrial fibrillatory action and wider cardiovascular safety margin than dronedarone.

Evaluation of the Switch From Amiodarone to Dronedarone in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the ARTEMIS AF Studies.

BACKGROUND: Switching between antiarrhythmic drugs is timed to minimize arrhythmia recurrence and adverse reactions. Dronedarone and amiodarone have similar electrophysiological profiles; however, little is known about the optimal timing of switching, given the long half-life of amiodarone. METHODS: The ARTEMIS atrial fibrillation (AF) Loading and Long-term studies evaluated switching patients with paroxysmal/persistent AF from amiodarone to dronedarone. Patients were randomized based on the timing of the switch: immediate, after a 2-week, or after a 4-week washout of amiodarone. Patients who did not convert to sinus rhythm after amiodarone loading underwent electrical cardioversion. The primary objectives were, for the Loading study, to evaluate recurrence of AF ≤60 days; and for the Long-term study, to profile the pharmacokinetics of dronedarone and its metabolite according to different timings of dronedarone initiation. RESULTS: In ARTEMIS AF Loading, 176 were randomized (planned 768) after a 28 ± 2 days load of oral amiodarone. Atrial fibrillation recurrence trended less in the immediate switch versus 4-week washout group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65 [97.5% CI: 0.34-1.23]; P = .14) and in the 2-week washout versus the 4-week washout group (HR = 0.75 [97.5% CI: 0.41-1.37]; P = .32). In ARTEMIS AF Long-term, 108 patients were randomized (planned 105). Pharmacokinetic analyses (n = 97) showed no significant differences for dronedarone/SR35021 exposures in the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: The trial was terminated early due to poor recruitment and so our findings are limited by low numbers. However, immediate switching from amiodarone to dronedarone appeared to be well tolerated and safe.

How the Deuteration of Dronedarone Can Modify Its Cardiovascular Profile: In Vivo Characterization of Electropharmacological Effects of Poyendarone, a Deuterated Analogue of Dronedarone.

Since deuterium replacement has a potential to modulate pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and toxicity, we developed deuterated dronedarone; poyendarone, and assessed its cardiovascular effects. Poyendarone hydrochloride in doses of 0.3 and 3 mg/kg over 30 s was intravenously administered to the halothane-anesthetized dogs (n = 4), which provided peak plasma concentrations of 108 ± 10 and 1120 ± 285 ng/mL, respectively. The 0.3 mg/kg shortened the ventricular repolarization period. The 3 mg/kg transiently increased the heart rate at 5 min but decreased at 45 min, and elevated the total peripheral vascular resistance and left ventricular preload, whereas it reduced the mean blood pressure at 5 min, left ventricular contractility and cardiac output. The transient tachycardic action is considered to be induced by the hypotension-induced, reflex-mediated increase of sympathetic tone. The 3 mg/kg delayed both intra-atrial and intra-ventricular conductions, indicating Na+ channel inhibitory action. Moreover, the 3 mg/kg transiently shortened the ventricular repolarization period at 5 min. No significant change was detected in the late repolarization by poyendarone, indicating it might not hardly significantly alter rapidly activating delayed-rectifier K+ current (IKr). Poyendarone prolonged the atrial effective refractory period greater than the ventricular parameter. When compared with dronedarone, poyendarone showed similar pharmacokinetics of dronedarone, but reduced ß-adrenoceptor blocking activity as well as the cardio-suppressive effect. Poyendarone failed to inhibit IKr and showed higher atrial selectivity in prolonging the effective refractory period of atrium versus ventricle. Thus, the deuteration may be an effective way to improve the cardiovascular profile of dronedarone. Poyendarone is a promising anti-atrial fibrillatory drug candidate.

Dronedarone: the effect of diet-induced obesity on its metabolism and experimental hyperlipidemia on its metabolism and tissue distribution in the rat.

Dronedarone biodistribution in hyperlipidemia and dronedarone metabolism in hyperlipidemia or obesity were assessed. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were given either normal standard chow with water or various high-fat or high-carbohydrate diets for 14 weeks. There was also a nonobese hyperlipidemic group given poloxamer 407 intraperitoneally. Liver and intestinal microsomes were prepared and the metabolic conversion of dronedarone to desbutyldronedarone was followed. A biodistribution study of dronedarone given orally was conducted in hyperlipidemic and control normolipidemic rats. The metabolism of dronedarone to desbutyldronedarone in control rats was consistent with substrate inhibition. However in the treatment groups, the formation of desbutyldronedarone did not follow substrate inhibition; hyperlipidemia and high-calorie diets created remarkable changes in dronedarone metabolic profiles and reduction in formation velocities. Tissue concentrations of dronedarone were much higher than in plasma. Furthermore, in hyperlipidemia, plasma and lung dronedarone concentrations were significantly higher compared to normolipidemia.

Preparation of Filaments and the 3D Printing of Dronedarone HCl Tablets for Treating Cardiac Arrhythmias.

The production of 3D-printed dosage forms requires the preparation of high-quality filaments containing an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). The objective of this research is to prepare filaments containing dronedarone hydrochloride, a drug used in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Filaments and 3D-printed tablets were subjected to characterization methods in order to prove and ensure the stability of the API and preservation of the drug content. Blends containing different proportions of dronedarone hydrochloride (DNR), polyethylene glycol (PEG), and polyvinyl alcohol filament (PVA) were prepared in two forms: as a powder mixture and as a solid dispersion. Thermogravimetric analysis was conducted, and the thermal properties of the components and polymer blends were tested using differential scanning calorimetry. Hot melt extrusion at 170 °C was used to prepare the filaments, and the fused deposition modeling technique was employed to print tablets. Drug release profiles were obtained by in vitro tests. The results indicate that the mixture containing 10 wt.% of polyethylene glycol prepared as a solid dispersion exhibits the most straightforward structure and shows only the slightest deviation from the target filament diameter. The compact structure of the tablet obtained from the filament provides a uniform in vitro drug release over a 24-h period. It also shows the smallest aberration from the expected DNR content in the tablet. The paper demonstrates that a blend containing 10 wt.% of PEG, 10 wt.% of DNR, and 80 wt.% of PVA filament is the most appropriate formula for extrusion and tablet printing.

Solid Lipid Nanoparticles of Dronedarone Hydrochloride for Oral Delivery: Optimization, In Vivo Pharmacokinetics and Uptake Studies.

BACKGROUND: Dronedarone HCl (DRD), owing to its poor aqueous solubility and extensive presystemic metabolism shows low oral bioavailability of about 4% without food, which increases to approximately 15% when administered with a high fat meal. OBJECTIVE: Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) were designed with glyceryl monstearate (GMS) in order to improve oral bioavailability of DRD. METHODS: Hot homogenization followed by probe sonication was used to prepare SLN dispersions. Box-Behnken design was used to optimize manufacturing conditions. SLN were characterized for particle size, zeta potential, entrapment efficiency, physical state and in vitro drug release. Pharmacokinetics and intestinal uptake study of dronedarone HCl loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (DRD-SLN) in the presence and absence of endocytic uptake inhibitor, chlorpromazine (CPZ) was performed with conscious male Wistar rats. RESULTS: Optimized formulation of SLN showed particle size of 233 ± 42 nm and entrapment efficiency of 87.4 ± 1.29%. Results of pharmacokinetic studies revealed enhancement of bioavailability of DRD by 2.68 folds from SLN as compared to DRD suspension. Significantly reduced bioavailability of DRD-SLNs in the presence of chlorpromazine, demonstrated the role of endocytosis in uptake of SLN formulation. CONCLUSION: These results indicated that dronedarone HCl loaded SLN could potentially be exploited as a delivery system for improving oral bioavailability by minimizing first pass metabolism.

Formulation of Dronedarone Hydrochloride-Loaded Proliposomes: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation Using Caco-2 and Rat Model.

The objective of the present study was to develop a proliposomal formulation to increase the oral bioavailability of dronedarone hydrochloride (dronedarone HCl) by enhancing solubility, dissolution, and/or intestinal absorption. Proliposomes were prepared by using solvent evaporation method. In this process, different ratios of drug, phospholipids, such as soy phosphatidylcholine (SPC), Phospholipon 90H, hydrogenated egg phosphatidylcholine (HEPC), and dimyristoyl phosphatidylglycerol (DMPG), and cholesterol were used. Physical characterization and in vitro dissolution studies were evaluated for the prepared formulations. In vitro transport across the membrane was carried out using Caco-2 cells. Among all the formulations, the amount of drug released in dissolution was higher with DPF8 formulation (drug:DMPG Na:cholesterol:::1:2:0.2) compared to the pure drug. Also, Caco-2 cell permeability studies resulted in 2.6-fold increase in apparent permeability. Optimized formulation was evaluated in vivo in male Sprague-Dawley rats. After single oral administration of optimized formulation (DPF8), a relative bioavailability of 148.36% was achieved compared to the pure drug. Improved oral bioavailability of dronedarone could be provided by an optimized proliposomal formulation with enhanced solubility, permeability, and oral absorption.

Dronedarone (a multichannel blocker) enhances the anticonvulsant potency of lamotrigine, but not that of lacosamide, pregabalin and topiramate in the tonic-clonic seizure model in mice.

Accumulating experimental evidence indicates that some recently licensed antiarrhythmic drugs, including dronedarone (a multichannel blocker) play a crucial role in initiation of seizures in both, in vivo and in vitro studies. Some of these antiarrhythmic drugs elevate the threshold for maximal electroconvulsions and enhance the anticonvulsant potency of classical antiepileptic drugs in preclinical studies. This study was aimed at determining the influence of dronedarone (an antiarrhythmic drug) on the anticonvulsant potency of four novel antiepileptic drugs (lacosamide, lamotrigine, pregabalin and topiramate) in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure model in mice. To exclude any potential pharmacokinetic contribution of dronedarone to the observed interactions, total brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs were measured. Dronedarone (50 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly enhanced the anticonvulsant potency of lamotrigine, by reducing its ED50 value from 7.67 mg/kg to 4.19 mg/kg (P < 0.05), in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure test in mice. On the contrary, dronedarone (50 mg/kg, i.p.) did not affect the anticonvulsant properties of lacosamide, pregabalin or topiramate in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure test in mice. Measurement of total brain concentrations of lamotrigine revealed that dronedarone did not significantly alter total brain concentrations of lamotrigine in experimental animals. Additionally, the combination of dronedarone with pregabalin significantly impaired motor coordination in animals subjected to the chimney test. In contrast, the combinations of other studied antiepileptic drugs with dronedarone had no negative influence on motor coordination in mice. It is advisable to combine dronedarone with lamotrigine to enhance the anticonvulsant potency of the latter drug. The combinations of dronedarone with lacosamide, pregabalin and topiramate resulted in neutral interactions in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure test in mice. However, a special caution is advised to patients receiving both, pregabalin and dronedarone due to some possible adverse effects that might occur with respect to motor coordination.

A new analytic tool developed to assess safe use recommendations.

PURPOSE: Develop a flexible analytic tool for the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Sentinel System to assess adherence to safe use recommendations with two capabilities: characterize adherence to patient monitoring recommendations for a drug, and characterize concomitant medication use before, during, and/or after drug therapy. METHODS: We applied the tool in the Sentinel Distributed Database to assess adherence to the labeled recommendation that patients treated with dronedarone undergo electrocardiogram (ECG) testing no less often than every 3 months. Measures of length of treatment, time to first ECG, number of ECGs, and time between ECGs were assessed. We also assessed concomitant use of contraception among female users of mycophenolate per label recommendations (concomitancy 4 weeks before through 6 weeks after discontinuation of mycophenolate). Unadjusted results were stratified by age, month-year, and sex. RESULTS: We identified 21 457 new episodes of dronedarone use of greater than or equal to 90 days (July 2009 to September 2015); 86% had greater than or equal to one ECG, and 22% met the recommendation of an ECG no less often than every 3 months. We identified 21 942 new episodes of mycophenolate use among females 12 to 55 years (January 2016 to September 2015); 16% had greater than or equal to 1 day of concomitant contraception dispensed, 12% had concomitant contraception use for greater than or equal to 50% of the 4 weeks before initiation through 6 weeks after mycophenolate; younger females had more concomitancy. These results may be underestimates as the analyses are limited to claims data. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a tool for use in databases formatted to the Sentinel Common Data Model that can assess adherence to safe use recommendations involving patient monitoring and concomitant drug use over time.

Effects of dronedarone on all-cause mortality and on cardiovascular events in patients treated for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of RCTs.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety profiles of the dronedarone were rather praised when the molecule was placed on the market (2009). However, there are today some safety concerns (in particular, risk of liver toxicity) that have led to limit the use of this drug to paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation, and to exclude it from therapy protocols for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The aim of the present study was to explore some efficacy and safety endpoints concerning dronedarone, by analyzing the evidence derived from quantitative evaluation (meta-analysis) of literature data. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We comprised in the meta-analysis exclusively randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported relevant clinical outcomes with dronedarone. In addition, eligible RCTs had to have randomized 100 patients at least in order to have adequate statistical power, and they had to have clearly reported the outcomes of interest. Primary efficacy outcomes were a) all-cause mortality,b) major acute cardiovascular events and c) worsening heart failure. Secondary outcomes of interest were ventricular tachyarrhythmias, stroke and systemic embolism. We performed a number of sensitivity analyses to better ascertain the sources of heterogeneity. We also performed a number of subgroup analyses. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: At the end of the selection process, the studies regarded suitable for meta-analysis were seven. Dronedarone use was not associated with any significant advantage as regards all-cause mortality(pooled odds ratio =1.31; 95% CI: 0.78 to 2.18; P= 0.31) and major cardiovascular events (pooled odds ratio=1.45; 95% CI: 0.7 to 3.01; P=0.28), as well as regarding the endpoint" worsening heart failure" (pooled odds ratio =1.32; 95% CI: 0.87 to 2.01; P= 0.20). Moreover, using subgroup analyses, in patients with permanent AF, dronedarone use was associated with increased all-cause mortality compared to placebo(P=0.03),as well as with higher risk of major acute cardiovascular events (P=0.04) and episodes of worsening heart failure(P=0.02). In addition, when data from ATHENA study were excluded, dronedarone use was associated with increased all-cause mortality (post exclusion pooled odds ratio=1.77; 95% CI: 1.15 to 2.72; P=0.0089), increased risk of major cardiovascular events (post exclusion pooled odds ratio=2.16; 95% CI: 1.34 to 3.47; P= 0.0014) and increased risk of worsening heart failure(post exclusion pooled odds ratio= 1.618; 95% CI: 1.14 to 2.3; P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In our meta-analysis, dronedarone did not provide any significant benefit with regard to all-cause mortality and major cardiovascular events, as well as regarding the risk of worsening heart failure. Sensitivity analyses then showed that the exclusion of a study, namely ATHENA study, caused a shift in the overall odds ratio, so as to convert the dronedarone use to the ominous role of predictor of higher mortality, worse cardiovascular morbidity and increased risk of worsening heart failure. Thus, dronedarone should be used with caution as second-line medication and exclusively for the secondary prevention of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation, in patients without signs or symptoms of cardiac decompensation, preferably for limited periods of time and under assiduous clinical and laboratory surveillance.

Dose proportionality and pharmacokinetics of dronedarone following intravenous and oral administration to rat.

The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic properties of dronedarone by using noncompartmental analysis and modeling approaches after intravenous and oral administration of dronedarone to rats. Twenty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups, and dronedarone was administered intravenously (1 mg/kg) and orally (5, 10 and 40 mg/kg) based on a parallel design. Blood samples were collected before and 0.083 (intravenous administration only), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 h after drug administration. The plasma concentration of dronedarone was determined by using LC-MS/MS. The oral bioavailability of dronedarone was evaluated as approximately 16% in rats, similar to that in humans. The assessment of dose proportionality by using the power model showed that AUCinf increased in a dose-proportional manner, whereas AUC24h and Cmax exhibited a lack of dose proportionality over the dose range between 5 and 40 mg/kg. The two-compartment model, with first-order absorption and elimination rate constants, was sufficient to explain the pharmacokinetics of dronedarone with biexponential decay. These findings will help to understand the pharmacology of dronedarone to develop the new formulation and therapeutics optimization linked to pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study.

Efficacy and safety of dronedarone in patients with amiodarone-induced hyperthyroidism: a clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine the safety and efficacy of dronedarone in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and amiodarone-induced hyperthyroidism. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the use of amiodarone and dronedarone in 124 patients with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who had no additional structural heart disease. All patients received amiodarone 200 mg qd. Out of 124 patients, 56 (45%) switched to dronedarone 400 mg bid due to amiodarone-induced hyperthyroidism and the remaining 68 patients (55%), with normal thyroid function, continued to receive amiodarone. The follow-up period was 12 months, and the patients were regularly monitored. RESULTS: The primary outcome after 6 months dronedarone and amiodarone group was 56 and 68, including 38 (68%) and 54 (79.4%) (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.17, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.68-2.02) patients with sinus rhythm (SR) and 18 (32.14%) and 14 (28.6%) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.64, confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.29-1.40) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The secondary outcome after 12 months showed significant difference in thyroid function in the dronedarone group. Out of 46 patients, 24 (56.18%) patients reduced hyperthyroidism compared to the amiodarone group; out of 68, 6 (8.9%) patients were observed to have hyperthyroidism. At 12 months, there were 24 (43%) and 22 (62%) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.75, confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.38-1.49) patients with SR, and 32 (57%) and 26 (38%) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.67, confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.36-1.25) patients with AF. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, dronedarone appears to be a good therapeutic option in the treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with amiodarone-induced hyperthyroidism. However, long-term studies are needed to estimate the efficacy and toxicity of both drugs.

The Antiarrhythmic Drug, Dronedarone, Demonstrates Cytotoxic Effects in Breast Cancer Independent of Thyroid Hormone Receptor Alpha 1 (THRα1) Antagonism.

Previous research has suggested that thyroid hormone receptor alpha 1 (THRα1), a hormone responsive splice variant, may play a role in breast cancer progression. Whether THRα1 can be exploited for anti-cancer therapy is unknown. The antiproliferative and antitumor effects of dronedarone, an FDA-approved anti-arrhythmic drug which has been shown to antagonize THRα1, was evaluated in breast cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo. The THRα1 splice variant and the entire receptor, THRα, were also independently targeted using siRNA to determine the effect of target knockdown in vitro. In our study, dronedarone demonstrates cytotoxic effects in vitro and in vivo in breast cancer cell lines at doses and concentrations that may be clinically relevant. However, knockdown of either THRα1 or THRα did not cause substantial anti-proliferative or cytotoxic effects in vitro, nor did it alter the sensitivity to dronedarone. Thus, we conclude that dronedarone's cytotoxic effect in breast cancer cell lines are independent of THRα or THRα1 antagonism. Further, the depletion of THRα or THRα1 does not affect cell viability or proliferation. Characterizing the mechanism of dronedarone's anti-tumor action may facilitate drug repurposing or the development of new anti-cancer agents.

Integration of "omics" techniques: Dronedarone affects cardiac remodeling in the infarction border zone.

Dronedarone improves microvascular flow during atrial fibrillation and reduces the infarct size in acute models of myocardial infarction. However, dronedarone might be harmful in patients with recent decompensated heart failure and increases mortality in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. A pathophysiological explanation for these discrepant data is lacking. This study investigated the effects of dronedarone on gene and protein expression in the infarcted area and border zone in pigs subjected to anterior ischemia/reperfusion myocardial infarction. The ischemia/reperfusion myocardial infarction was induced in 16 pigs. Eight pigs were treated with dronedarone for 28 days after myocardial infarction, the remaining pigs served as control. Microarray-based transcriptome profiling and 2D-DIGE-based proteome analysis were used to assess the effects of dronedarone on left ventricular gene expression in healthy (LV), infarcted (MI), and border zone tissue. Selected targets were validated by RT-qPCR or immunoblot analyses, with special emphasize given to the transcriptome/proteome overlap. Combined "omics" analysis was performed to identify most significant disease and function charts affected by dronedarone and to establish an integrated network. The levels of 879 (BZ) or 7 (MI) transcripts and 51 (LV) or 15 (BZ) proteins were significantly altered by dronedarone, pointing to a substantial efficacy of dronedarone in the border zone. Transcriptome and proteome data indicate that dronedarone influences post-infarction remodeling processes and identify matricellular proteins as major targets of dronedarone in this setting. This finding is fully supported by the disease and function charts as well as by the integrated network established by combined "omics". Dronedarone therapy alters myocardial gene expression after acute myocardial infarction with pronounced effects in the border zone. Dronedarone promotes infarct healing via regulation of periostin and might contribute to the limitation of its expansion as well as cardiac rupture. Thus, there are no experimental hints that dronedarone per se has direct harmful effects after MI in ventricular tissue. Impact statement Dronedarone reduced the infarct size in models of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Here, we show that dronedarone attenuates many of the substantial changes in gene expression that are provoked by acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in pigs. Dronedarone modifies the expression of gene panels related to post-infarction cardiac healing and remodeling processes and, most remarkably, this occurs predominantly in the infarction border-zone and much less so in the vital or infarcted myocardium. Combined "omics" identified matricellular proteins and ECM as major dronedarone-regulated targets and emphasizes their relevance for Disease Charts and Tox Function Charts associated with tissue remodeling and cellular movement. The results demonstrate dronedarone's capability of regulating cardiac repair and remodeling processes specifically in the infarction border zone and identify underlying mechanisms and pathways that might be employed in future therapeutic strategies to improve long-term cardiac tissue function and stability.

Safety of apixaban in combination with dronedarone in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: There have been concerns about bleeding risks for patients with atrial fibrillation treated with dronedarone in combination with new oral anticoagulants (NOACs). The aim of the study was to compare the bleeding risks with the apixaban + dronedarone and warfarin + dronedarone combinations. METHOD: Retrospective study of Swedish nationwide health registers. All patients with atrial fibrillation who used dronedarone in combination with apixaban or warfarin during 2013-2016 were identified. Two propensity matched cohorts of each 1681 patients were compared. The main endpoint included intracranial bleeding, bleedings with hospitalization and fatal bleedings. RESULTS: Bleedings thus defined occurred at rates of 1.31 and 2.14 per 100 years at risk with the apixaban and warfarin combinations respectively (p = 0.121). The hazard ratio with the apixaban combination was 0.66 (CI 0.35-1.23) compared to the warfarin combination. No significant differences were seen regarding secondary endpoints. CONCLUSION: Major bleedings were rare among patients with atrial fibrillation treated with dronedarone in combination with apixaban or warfarin. No significant differences in favour of either drug combination were found.

Assessing the Risk for Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients Treated With Dronedarone Compared With That in Other Antiarrhythmics.

PURPOSE: There are few data on the risk for peripheral neuropathy associated with dronedarone, a newer antiarrhythmic medicine. The objective of this study was to assess whether dronedarone is potentially associated with an increased risk for peripheral neuropathy compared with other antiarrhythmics, including amiodarone, sotalol, flecainide, and propafenone. METHODS: The MarketScan database was used for identifying patients who were at least 18 years of age, had atrial fibrillation or flutter, and had not been diagnosed with peripheral neuropathy in the 180-day period prior to or on the date of the first prescription of an antiarrhythmic between July 20, 2009, and December 31, 2011. Peripheral neuropathy that occurred during the treatment period for a study drug was ascertained using ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes. For each antiarrhythmic, the incidence rate of peripheral neuropathy was calculated. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for peripheral neuropathy for dronedarone compared with another antiarrhythmic was obtained, with control for age, sex, diabetes mellitus status, and the presence of other comorbidities. FINDINGS: The study population included 106,933 patients treated with dronedarone (n = 12,989), amiodarone (n = 45,173), sotalol (n = 22,036), flecainide (n = 14,244), or propafenone (n = 12,491). The incidence rates (per 1000 person-years) of peripheral neuropathy were 1.33 for dronedarone, 2.38 for amiodarone, 1.20 for sotalol, 1.08 for flecainide, and 1.97 for propafenone. The aHRs for peripheral neuropathy for dronedarone relative to other drugs ranged from 0.53 (95% CI, 0.21-1.34) compared with propafenone, to 0.94 (95% CI, 0.38-2.30) compared with sotalol. A new-user analysis showed similar results. IMPLICATIONS: The risks for peripheral neuropathy were not significantly different between dronedarone and other antiarrhythmics.