Paradoxical Embolic Stroke Following Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in a Hemodialysis Patient.

Paradoxical embolism is a medical condition characterized by the migration of an embolus from a venous source into the systemic circulation. This occurs through a specific cardiac abnormality known as a right-to-left shunt, ultimately resulting in the possibility of arterial embolism. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is the most common cause of intracardiac shunting. We reported a rare case of a 56-year-old man on hemodialysis with PFO and arteriovenous fistula dysfunction who suffered a paradoxical embolic ischemic stroke after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. This case emphasized the potential risk of paradoxical embolism in hemodialysis patients with vascular access problems. We aimed to highlight the importance of searching for PFO, as it may serve as a possible source of embolism in these patients.

Retinal arterial occlusion and patent foramen ovale: A case study-based review.

PURPOSE: To identify all reported cases of retinal artery occlusion (RAO) associated with patent foramen ovale (PFO) in the literature and present a similar case of CRAO from our clinic. METHODS: PubMed database was searched for studies reporting RAO in individuals with PFO. Relevant data were tabulated and reviewed. We estimated each case's Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score. RESULTS: 23 cases of CRAO (n=10; including ours), BRAO (n=10), and CILRAO (n=3) were reviewed. Most cases were under 50 years of age (78.3%). The reported predisposing factors were: hypertension (26.1%), migraine (17.3%), smoking (13.0%), recent immobilization (13.0%), strenuous exertion (8.7%), pregnancy (8.7%), and diabetes (4.3%). A high RoPE score (≥7; suggestive of paradoxical embolism via PFO) was estimated for 71.4% of patients. In most cases, the neurological and cardiovascular examinations, laboratory studies, and imaging were unremarkable, except for the PFO±atrial septal aneurysm (present in 21.7%). In only 28.6% of cases, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) (± saline contrast) could visualize the PFO; transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was necessary to detect the PFO in 71.4%. Approximately one-half of the patients underwent percutaneous closure of the PFO; no complications or subsequent acute ischemic events ensued. The visual prognosis was poorer for CRAO than for BRAO or CILRAO. CONCLUSION: Timely diagnosis, acute management, and ensuring urgent initiation of stroke workup in cases with RAO or transient monocular vision loss are crucial. Clues to a possible paradoxical embolism as the cause include the absence of known cardiovascular risk factors, young age, migraine, recent immobility, vigorous exercise, and pregnancy.

[Thromboembolic diseases from a cardiological point of view]. / Thromboembolische Erkrankungen aus kardiologischer Sicht.

Thromboembolic disease is associated with a high mortality. It can be divided into two groups: embolism from a venous and embolism from an arterial side. This article gives an overview on thromboembolic disease (with a focus on pulmonary embolism and ischemic stroke) from a cardiologist's perspective.The therapeutic options for acute pulmonary embolism range from anticoagulation to fibrinolysis to interventional recanalization and surgery. The deciding factor for choice of therapy is the risk of early death. Besides clinical parameters, laboratory markers like cardiac troponin and right ventricular function on echocardiography or CTPA (computed tomography pulmonary angiography) are used to determine the early mortality risk. In hemodynamically instable patients, immediate thrombolysis is required, whereas patients with intermediate and low risk can be treated with anticoagulation. Interventional recanalization is currently being studied in patients at risk for development of CTEPH (chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension) or an intermediate risk of early mortality.In ischemic stroke, early interdisciplinary workup involving a cardiologist is paramount. Post stroke screening should include monitoring for arrythmias (especially atrial fibrillation) and transthoracic echocardiography as well as sonography of extra- and intracranial arteries. If no embolic source can be detected (embolic stroke of undetermined source), transesophageal echo can be helpful to detect intracardiac shunts like patent foramen ovale (PFO) or intracardiac tumors. Post stroke care includes secondary prevention measures like risk factor modification and lipid lowering therapy as well as anticoagulation. In high risk for paradoxical embolization, interventional PFO closure can be performed. Interventional closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) can be discussed in patients with both high thromboembolic and bleeding risk.

Saddle Pulmonary Embolus and Simultaneous Common Carotid and Subclavian Artery Emboli.

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is present in 27-35% of the population. Right to left cardiac shunts predispose patients to arterial emboli in the presence of venous thromboembolisms. Paradoxical embolus should be suspected in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and arterial emboli. A 45-year-old man with hypercoagulability and history of DVT presented with a week-long history of chest pain, shortness of breath, and left arm numbness. Imaging showed a saddle pulmonary embolus (PE) and emboli involving the aortic arch, left common carotid, and left subclavian artery. The patient proceeded with an endovascular thrombectomy of the pulmonary artery, followed by open thrombectomy. Echocardiogram confirmed a right to left intra-cardiac shunt consistent with a PFO. Paradoxical emboli are rare manifestations of venous thromboemboli in patients with right to left intra-cardiac shunts. Patients should be evaluated for these to help prevent further manifestations.

Cardiogenic shock due to pulmonary thromboembolism: the role of surgical thrombectomy.

A 53-year-old male patient with history of repaired hernia, who is admitted for 5 days of progressive dyspnea with diagnosis of abdominal sepsis, a computed tomography angiography was made, revealing pulmonary embolism in bilateral main pulmonary artery, and cardiac thrombectomy was performed.

Paciente masculino de 53 años de edad con historial de reparación de hernia, quien fue ingresado por presentar 5 días de disnea progresiva con diagnóstico de sepsis abdominal, se le realizó una angiografía por tomografía computada, revelando embolismo bilateral arteria pulmonar principal, se realizó una trombectomía cardíaca.

Patent foramen ovale: diagnostic evaluation and the role of device closure.

Although seemingly benign, the presence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) may play an important role in the pathophysiology of disease, specifically a paradoxical embolism leading to cryptogenic stroke. The European Society of Cardiology recently published guidelines detailing how PFOs are associated with paradoxical embolism and how they are diagnosed and managed. This review guides physicians in the diagnostic and referral process to a multidisciplinary team involved in PFO closure. It reviews the clinical trials comparing device closure with medical therapy and highlights the current NHS England commissioning process on PFO management. Finally, we give an overview of other conditions where PFO device closure may need to be considered.

Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With Peripheral (Noncerebrovascular) Embolism.

OBJECTIVES: Scarce data exist on noncerebrovascular peripheral embolism (NCPE) patients undergoing transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure. The objectives of this study were to determine the clinical and procedural characteristics, and long-term outcomes of patients with NCPE undergoing transcatheter PFO closure. METHODS: This was a multicenter study including 1136 consecutive patients who underwent PFO closure after a thromboembolic event. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the type of event leading to PFO closure, ie, cerebrovascular event (CVE, n = 1099 [96.7%]) and NCPE (n = 37 [3.3%]). The median follow-up was 3 years (interquartile range, 1-8), with follow-up complete in 98%. RESULTS: Patients in the NCPE group exhibited higher rates of prior or concomitant pulmonary embolism (29.7% vs 3.4%; P<.001), and prior myocardial infarction (24.3% vs 1.8%; P<.001). Most NCPE events were located in the limbs (41%), followed by coronary (27%) and renal/splenic/mesenteric arteries (12%). PFO closure was successful in all patients, with a low complication rate (<1%) in both groups. NCPE patients were more frequently treated with anticoagulation following PFO closure (63% vs 13%; P<.001). There were no differences between NCPE and CVE groups in death (0 per 100 patient years vs 0.4 per 100 patient-years; P=.53) or cerebrovascular events (1.3 per 100 patient-years vs 0.4 per 100 patient-years; P=.15) at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NCPE events undergoing PFO closure exhibited differential baseline characteristics compared with patients with CVEs; limbs and coronary arteries were the most frequent NCPE location. PFO closure results and long-term outcomes were similar to their CVE counterparts, with a very low rate of recurrent thromboembolic events. Further studies are needed in this population.

Cardiac metastasis causes paradoxical malignant embolism.

BACKGROUND: Embolic events play an important role in clinical everyday practice. Malignant arterial embolism is a rare nevertheless often fatal entity for cardiac, cerebral or systemic ischemia, requiring immediate diagnosis and treatment. CASE: This is a case report of a 65 years-old female, suffering from pulmonal adenocarcinoma, who was hospitalized due to neurological deficits caused by an acute ischemic stroke, followed by anterior myocardial infarction within 3 days. Diagnostic work-up revealed metastasis of the pulmonal adenocarcinoma in the right atrium and a patent foramen ovale. Histopathological examination of the coronary embolus verified paradoxical arterial embolism of the pulmonal adenocarcinoma into a coronary vessel and consequently cerebral arteries. CONCLUSION: The present case underlines the need for (i), consideration of malignant embolism, (ii) histopathological examination of the embolus to determine its etiology, and (iii) interdisciplinary discussion of individual therapeutic and prevention strategies in cancer patients with cerebral, cardiac or systemic embolic events.

Large paradoxical embolus through a patent foramen ovale following arteriovenous graft thrombectomy.

An 86-year-old man with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis with an arteriovenous fistula in his left upper extremity presented to his hemodialysis session with thrombosis of his arteriovenous fistula. The patient underwent surgical thrombectomy. The patient later showed evidence of peripheral embolization and livedo reticularis. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiograms revealed a large thrombus (5 × 2 cm) in the right atrium prolapsing to the left atrium via a patent foramen ovale and another thrombus adherent to the apical wall of the right ventricle. The thrombus in the left atrium was intermittently crossing the mitral valve and entering the left ventricle.

Concomitant pulmonary embolism and upper limb ischaemia as a first presentation of a patent foramen ovale.

A 78-year-old female patient presented to the emergency department with syncope and dyspnoea. The left arm appeared to be cold and radial pulse was not palpable. A CT scan of the chest and left arm with intravenous contrast displayed bilateral central pulmonary embolisms in combination with a left subclavian artery embolism and an atrial septal aneurysm. Transthoracic echocardiography identified a patent foramen ovale with right-to-left shunting confirming the diagnosis of paradoxical embolism. The patient was treated with anticoagulants. In a patient presenting with a combination of a pulmonary embolism and a peripheral arterial embolism, the clinician should consider a right-to-left shunt with paradoxical embolism. In line with this, when diagnosing a peripheral arterial embolism, a central venous origin should be considered. Furthermore, when diagnosing a pulmonary embolism or other forms of venous thromboembolism, the clinician should be aware of signs of a peripheral arterial embolism.

Efficacy and safety of percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure in patients with a hypercoagulable disorder.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with cryptogenic stroke reduces the rate of recurrent events. Although presence of thrombophilia increases the risk for paradoxical emboli through a PFO, such patients were excluded from large randomized trials. OBJECTIVES: We compared the safety and efficacy of percutaneous PFO closure in patients with and without a hypercoagulable state. METHODS: Data from 800 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous PFO closure in our medical center were analyzed. All patients were independently evaluated by specialists in neurology, cardiology, hematology, and vascular medicine. A post-procedural treatment of at least 3 months of anticoagulation was utilized in patients with thrombophilia. Follow-up events included death, recurrent neurological events, and the need for reintervention for significant residual shunt. RESULTS: A hypercoagulable state was found in 239 patients (29.9%). At median follow-up of 41.9 months, there were no differences in the frequencies of stroke or transient ischemic attack between patients with or without thrombophilia (2.5% in non-hypercoagulable group vs. 3.4% in hypercoagulable group, log-rank test p = 0.35). There were no significant differences in baseline demographics, echocardiographic characteristics, procedural success, or complications between groups. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous PFO closure is a safe and effective therapeutic approach for patients with cryptogenic stroke and an underlying hypercoagulable state.

Bilateral Acute Renal Infarction Due to Paradoxical Embolism in a Patient with Eisenmenger Syndrome and a Ventricular Septal Defect.

A 52-year-old man who was diagnosed with Eisenmenger syndrome due to a muscular-type ventricular septal defect 30 years previously, visited our emergency room after experiencing six hours of severe left flank pain and vomiting. On laboratory examination, azotemia and microscopic haematuria were identified. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography also revealed pulmonary embolism (PE) and bilateral acute renal infarction. The flank pain resolved after heparin was administered for anti-coagulation and aspiration thrombectomy was performed. The patient was discharged on warfarin as anticoagulant therapy. In this case, a paradoxical embolism was considered to have been the cause of PE and bilateral acute renal infarction in a patient with Eisenmenger syndrome.

Oclusão arterial aguda consequente a embolia paradoxal - relato de caso e revisão de literatura / Acute arterial occlusion resulting from paradoxical embolism - case report and literature review

Resumo A embolia paradoxal é a transposição de um trombo originário da circulação sistêmica venosa para a arterial através de um defeito cardíaco, mais comumente o forame oval pérvio (FOP). A manifestação mais comum é o acidente cerebrovascular. A oclusão arterial aguda (OAA) é rara, requer alta suspeição diagnóstica e corresponde a menos de 2% de todos casos de embolia arterial. O tromboembolismo pulmonar (TEP) é a causa mais comum de elevação temporária do shunt direita-esquerda em pacientes com FOP e ocorre em pelo menos 60% dos casos de embolia paradoxal. Em 2019, um homem de 27 anos, sem fator para hipercoagulabilidade, deu entrada no Hospital Universitário do ABC, com quadro de OAA grau I Rutherford em membros inferiores secundária a tromboembolismo através de FOP prévio não diagnosticado, associado a trombose venosa profunda de membro inferior direito e TEP bilateral. O manejo incluiu anticoagulação plena e encaminhamento para cirurgia cardíaca.

Resumo A embolia paradoxal é a transposição de um trombo originário da circulação sistêmica venosa para a arterial através de um defeito cardíaco, mais comumente o forame oval pérvio (FOP). A manifestação mais comum é o acidente cerebrovascular. A oclusão arterial aguda (OAA) é rara, requer alta suspeição diagnóstica e corresponde a menos de 2% de todos casos de embolia arterial. O tromboembolismo pulmonar (TEP) é a causa mais comum de elevação temporária do shunt direita-esquerda em pacientes com FOP e ocorre em pelo menos 60% dos casos de embolia paradoxal. Em 2019, um homem de 27 anos, sem fator para hipercoagulabilidade, deu entrada no Hospital Universitário do ABC, com quadro de OAA grau I Rutherford em membros inferiores secundária a tromboembolismo através de FOP prévio não diagnosticado, associado a trombose venosa profunda de membro inferior direito e TEP bilateral. O manejo incluiu anticoagulação plena e encaminhamento para cirurgia cardíaca.

Multiple Intracardiac and Paradoxical Thrombi Caused by a Thrombus Entrapped in a Patent Foramen Ovale.

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) usually represents a benign incidental finding. Occasionally, a PFO can open widely, resulting in paradoxical embolism, with potentially devastating consequence. Floating intracardiac thrombi and thrombus straddling a PFO are 2 extremely rare conditions associated with a dismal prognosis and encountered almost exclusively in the setting of pulmonary embolism (PE). We report the unusual case of a 47-year-old man with an unremarkable medical history who presented with a bilateral PE and multiple paradoxical and intracardiac floating thrombi in the setting of a thrombus entrapped in a PFO.

Acute Ischemic Stroke as a Result of Paradoxical Embolus in a Patient with Renal Cell Carcinoma, Intravenous Tumor Thrombus Extension, and Patent Foramen Ovale.

INTRODUCTION: Patent foramen ovale is a common congenital cardiac abnormality. An association with acute ischemic stroke is well described. Extension of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) into the adjacent veins is common. Surgical resection is felt to be an effective approach to treatment, even in the setting of extensive venous involvement. CASE REPORT: A 55-year-old woman with recently diagnosed right renal mass and cavoatrial tumor thrombus was transferred to our facility for surgical resection. She subsequently underwent open radical right nephrectomy, regional lymph node dissection, inferior vena cava and right atrial tumor thrombectomy, and resection of the infrahepatic vena cava. An intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram confirmed the absence of tumor thrombus from the inferior vena cava and right atrium and also identified a patent foramen ovale (PFO). Upon weaning sedation, she was noted to be agitated and have left hemiplegia. Her National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 30 and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 6. The computerized tomography scan of head revealed extensive hypoattenuation right in the middle and left posterior cerebral artery territories. There was associated cerebral edema and 5-mm midline shift. In the setting of devastating neurological injury, her family elected to transition to comfort care and the patient died on the postoperative day 7. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first reported case of intraoperative paradoxical embolism in the setting of RCC with cavoatrial extension and PFO. The presence of PFO may be a risk factor for severe cerebrovascular complications in the surgical management of RCC with venous involvement.

Paradoxical embolism after surgery for breast cancer: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Paradoxical embolism (PDE) presented with concomitant pulmonary embolism (PE) and renal artery embolism (RAE) which occurred to breast cancer patient after breast-conserving therapy, has never been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old female with breast cancer exhibited unexplained hypoxemia, followed with vomiting, diarrhea, unilateral flank pain and abdominal pain after lumpectomy 12 h. The urgent multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) confirmed the diagnosis of PE and RAE. Confusingly, the patient had no history of intracardiac defect, cardiac valvular diseases, atrial fibrillation or other cardiovascular disease and the definite cause was still unclear. However, after 10 days of prompt anticoagulant therapy in ICU, she was discharged in good condition. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer patients after surgery suffering from unexplained hypoxemia, abdominal pain, vomiting and diarrhea should be highly suspicious of PE or RAE, even PDE. Any clinical presentation on these postoperative patients should be given much more attention to make accurate diagnosis and appropriate interventions.

Diagnostic Yield of Early Examination for Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke and a Right-to-left Shunt.

Objective The presence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in a cryptogenic stroke (CS) patient with a right-to-left shunt (RLS) may lead to the development of paradoxical embolism. The aim of the present was to investigate the prevalence of DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) in CS patients and the clinical features of CS in relation to DVT location and the presence of PE. Methods The medical records of 903 patients with cerebral infarction were retrospectively reviewed. For patients with a diagnosis of CS, contrast saline transcranial color-coded sonography was performed to identify an RLS. DVT and PE were assessed by duplex ultrasonography and/or contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Proximal DVT (P-DVT) was defined as DVT in the popliteal, femoral, or iliac veins, and distal DVT (D-DVT) was defined as DVT at other locations. The patients were divided into three groups: CS with P-DVT and/or PE (P-DVT/PE) group; CS with D-DVT (D-DVT) group; and CS without DVT (no DVT) group. Results Seventy-two (37%) of 194 patients with CS had an RLS. The median time to first DVT examination from stroke onset was three days. Twenty-nine percent of CS patients with an RLS had DVT. The P-DVT/PE group comprised 8.3% of the CS patients with an RLS and included a larger number of patients with multi-territory infarction than the D-DVT group. The D-DVT and P-DVT/PE groups tended to be female and older, while the P-DVT/PE group tended to have pre-stroke disability. Conclusion CS patients, especially those with multi-territory lesions, should be immediately examined for DVT and PE.